DOCSLIB.ORG

Criminal Law CONSENT in the CRIMINAL LAW a Consultation Paper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Criminal Law CONSENT IN THE CRIMINAL LAW A Consultation Paper LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER No 139 The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the I purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: , The Honourable Mr Justice Brooke, Chairman Professor Andrew Burrows Miss Diana Faber Mr Charles Harpum Mr Stephen Silber, QC The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WClN 2BQ. This Consultation Paper, completed for publication on 1 November 1995, is circulated for I comment and criticism only. It does not represent the final views of the Law Commission. The Law Commission would be grateful for comments on this Consultation Paper before 30 June 1996. All correspondence should be addressed to: Mr M Chapman Law Commission Conquest House 37-38 John Street Theobalds Road London WC 1N 2BQ Tel: 0171- 453 1288 Fax: 0171- 453 1297 It may be helpful for the Law Commission, either in discussion with others concerned or in any subsequent recommendations, to be able to refer to and attribute comments submitted in response to this Consultation Paper. Any request to treat all, or part, of a response in confidence will, of course, be respected, but if no such request is made the Law Commission will assume that the response is not intended to be confidential. The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 139 Criminal Law CONSENT IN THE CRIMINAL LAW A Consultation Paper HMSO 0 Crown copyright 1995 Applications for reproduction should be made to HMSO Copyright Unit, St. Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1PD ISBN 0 11 730224 4 Printed in the United Kingdom for HMSO Dd 301848 12/95 C15 59226 17-384-06 THE LAW COMM%§SION ONSENT INTHE C CONTENTS Paragraphs Page PART I: GENERAL OVERVIEW Introductory 1.1 - 1.9 1 The current proceedings before the Strasbourg Commission 1.10 4 The present law 1.11 - 1.13 4 Offences against the person 1.11 4 Sexual offences 1.12 - 1.13 5 Modem proposals for law reform 1.14 - 1.17 6 Offences against the person 1.14 - 1.16 6 Sexual offences 1.17 7 The doctrine of necessity 1.18 - 1.19 7 Secondary liability for consenting parties 1.20 - 1.23 8 Consent as a defence in the wider criminal law 1.24 - 1.27 10 The structure of this paper 1.28 - 1.30 11 PART PI: POLICIES FOR REF0 Introductory 2.1 - 2.2 13 Liberal responses 2.3 - 2.4 13 Paternalist and legal moralist responses 2.5 - 2.9 14 Pragmatic considerations about law enforcement 2.10 16 A recent indication of Parliamentary opinion 2.11 16 Recent case law 2.12 17 Our preferred approach 2.13 - 2.19 18 PART 111: THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Sado-masochism 3.1 - 3.11 21 Lawful correction 3.12 - 3.21 24 Religious and cultural practices 3.22 - 3.27 27 Suicide and euthanasia 3.28 - 3.32 29 I.. 111 Paragraphs Page PART IV: CONSENT TO INJURY OR THE RISK OF INJURY AND THE CRIMINAL LAW BILL Introductory 4.1 -4.2 32 Consent to injury 4.3 - 4.6 32 Consent to risk of injury 4.7 - 4.28 33 Reasonableness of risk to be assessed in the light of all the circumstances 4.9 - 4.14 34 Unreasonable risk and consent 4.15 35 Consent a complete defence? 4.16 - 4.17 36 Consent wholly immaterial? 4.18 - 4.20 36 Consent relevant to reasonableness of risk 4.21 - 4.28 37 The definition of seriously disabling injury 4.29 - 4.40 39 Consent and the legal burden of proof 4.41 - 4.45 44 Law reform proposals 4.46 - 4.53 46 Intentional causing of seriously disabling injury 4.47 46 Reckless causing of seriously disabling injury 4.48 46 Intentional causing of other injuries 4.49 47 Reckless causing of other injuries 4.50 47 Definition of seriously disabling injury 4.5 1 47 Meaning of consent 4.52 48 Burden of proof on the issue of consent 4.53 48 PART V: CAPACITY TO CONSENT Introductory 5.1 49 Capacity to consent 5.2 49 Capacity to consent: minors 5.3 - 5.1 1 50 Introductory 5.3 50 Offences against the person 5.4 - 5.7 50 Sexual offences 5.8 51 The responses on consultation 5.9 - 5.1 1 52 Mental incapacity 5.12 - 5.18 53 The present law 5.12 - 5.15 53 Legal competence 5.16 - 5.17 54 The responses on consultation 5.18 55 Law reform proposals 5.19 - 5.22 56 Persons without capacity 5.21 56 Definition of persons without capacity 5.21 56 Capacity and minors 5.21 57 Capacity and the mentally disabled 5.21 57 Capacity to understand in broad terms 5.21 57 iv Paragrap hs Page PART VI: FRAUD, MISTAKE, FQRCE, THREATS, ABUSE QF POWER AND OTHER P Introductory 6.1 - 6.4 59 The CLRC Review and the Draft Criminal Code 6.5 - 6.7 61 Consultation on the meaning of consent 6.8 - 6.10 62 Fraud and mistake 6.1 1 - 6.33 62 The requirement for information to be given 6.22 - 6.23 67 Self-induced mistake and non-disclosure 6.24 - 6.33 68 Force and threats of force 6.34 - 6.37 70 Other threats and intimidation 6.38 - 6.72 72 Whether the act threatened is lawful 6.50 75 Whether the consent is voluntary 6.51 - 6.58 75 Whether the threat is legitimate 6.59 - 6.64 78 Threats, offers and abuse of power 6.65 - 6.72 80 Other pressures 6.73 - 6.77 82 Law reform proposals 6.78 - 6.90 85 Types of deception that may nullify consent 6.79 85 Other types of fraudulent misrepresentation that may nullify consent 6.80 85 An offence of procuring consent by deception 6.81 85 A definition of “deception” 6.82 86 Inducing another person to perform an act on oneself by deception 6.83 86 The duty to communicate information 6.84 86 Self-induced mistake 6.85 86 Non-disclosure 6.86 87 Inducement by threats of non-consensual force 6.87 87 The effect of other threats on the validity of consent 6.88 87 An offence of procuring consent by threats 6.89 87 Special consideration for a particular class of threat 6.90 88 PART VII: THE DEFENDANT’§ MENS REA 7.1 - 7.35 89 PART VIII: MEDICAL AND SURGICAL TREATMENT Introductory 8.1 - 8.6 102 The approach adopted in other criminal codes 8.7 - 8.11 104 The relevant issues 8.12 - 8.24 105 The nature and scope of the defence of necessity 8.13 106 Who may lawfully administer medical treatment 8.14 - 8.15 106 That the treatment is performed with reasonable skill and care 8.16 107 That it is reasonable to administer the treatment 8.17 107 That the treatment is for a therapeutic purpose, for the purposes of medical research, or for another lawful purpose 8.18 107 V Paragraphs Page That if the person in question is capable, he or she has given consent 8.19 - 8.21 107 That if the person in question is not capable or is under 18 a lawful consent has otherwise been given 8.22 108 That the treatment is for the patient’s benefit 8.23 108 That the treatment, or research, involves a risk of harm that is not disproportionate to the expected benefits 8.24 108 The formulation of a medical exemption 8.25 - 8.48 109 Sterilisation 8.26 109 Abortion 8.27 109 Sexual reassignment operations 8.28 - 8.29 110 Cosmetic surgery 8.30 110 Organ transplants 8.31 - 8.37 111 Medical research 8.38 - 8.48 114 Law reform proposals 8.49 - 8.52 117 PART IX: CIRCUMCISION, TATTOOING, COSMETIC PIERCING, BRANDING AND SCARIFICATION Introductory 9.1 119 Circumcision 9.2 - 9.3 119 Male circumcision 9.2 119 Female circumcision 9.3 120 Tattooing 9.4 - 9.6 120 Piercing, branding and scarification 9.7 - 9.21 122 Decorative practices 9.7 - 9.12 122 Religious and cultural practices 9.13 - 9.19 124 Piercing etc: a general comment 9.20 - 9.21 126 Law reform proposals 9.22 - 9.29 i 27 PART X: THE INFLICTIQN OF INJURY BY CQNSENT FOk THE PURPOSE OF CAUSING PAIN The causing of pain for religious or spiritual purposes 10.1 - 10.15 130 The causing of pain to enhance sexual pleasure 10.16 - 10.41 133 The borderline between sex and violence 10.42 - 10.51 144 Law reform proposals 10.52 - 10.55 146 Injuries intentionally caused for sexual, religious or spiritual purposes 10.55 148 PART XI: LAWFUL CO CTPON 11.1 - 11.20 149 vi Paragraphs Page ES, MARTIAL ARTS Introductory 12.1 - 12.6 157 The intentional infliction of injury 12.7 - 12.8 159 The reckless infliction of injury 12.9 - 12.31 159 The test of “reasonableness” 12.15 - 12.16 161 The court’s power to determine whether the rules are reasonable 12.17 - 12.23 162 How our proposals would work in practice 12.24 - 12.31 163 Boxing 12.32 - 12.38 165 Martial arts 12.39 - 12.50 167 Amateur play and practice 12.51 170 Secondary liability 12.52 - 12.59 170 Presence at the scene 12.55 - 12.57 171 Failure to exercise control 12.58 - 12.59 172 School games and compulsory sports activities 12.60 - 12.63 173 Dangerous exhibitions 12.64 - 12.67 174 Law reform proposals 12.68 - 12.69 175 XI TS Introductory 13.1 - 13.5 177 Recognition machinery 13.6 - 13.18 178 Law reform proposals 13.19 - 13.20 182 OWSEPEAY Introductory 14.1 184 The law relating to offences against the person 14.2 - 14.3 184 The law relating to the preservation of public order 14.4 - 14.7 185 The responses on consultation 14.8 - 14.15 186 Law reform proposals 14.16 - 14.21 188 PART XV: OFFENCES CONCERNED WITH PUBLIC MORALITY AND PUBLIC DECENCY Introductory 15.1 191 Keeping a disorderly house 15.2 - 15.4 191 Brothel-keeping 15.5 1 192 Previous law reform proposals 15.6 - 15.8 193 Offences against public decency 15.9 - 15.11 194 Conclusions 15.12 195 PART XVI: SUMMARY OF PROVISIONAL WOPOSALS AND ISSUES FO NSUJLTATION 197 vii Paragraphs Page APPENDIX A: RELEVANT PROVISIONS IN THE PRESENT LAW, THE CRIMINAL LAW BILL, AND THE DRAFT CRIMINAL CODE Offences against the person 210 Relevant extracts from the 1993 Criminal Law Bill 210 Sexual offences 21 1 (i) Some relevant provisions of the present law 21 1 (ii) Some sample extracts from
Recommended publications
  • Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Commonwealth

    Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Commonwealth

    Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth: Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites © Human Rights Consortium, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN 978-1-912250-13-4 (2018 PDF edition) DOI 10.14296/518.9781912250134 Institute of Commonwealth Studies School of Advanced Study University of London Senate House Malet Street London WC1E 7HU Cover image: Activists at Pride in Entebbe, Uganda, August 2012. Photo © D. David Robinson 2013. Photo originally published in The Advocate (8 August 2012) with approval of Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG) and Freedom and Roam Uganda (FARUG). Approval renewed here from SMUG and FARUG, and PRIDE founder Kasha Jacqueline Nabagesera. Published with direct informed consent of the main pictured activist. Contents Abbreviations vii Contributors xi 1 Human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity in the Commonwealth: from history and law to developing activism and transnational dialogues 1 Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites 2
  • October 2012 Highlights Documentaries

    October 2012 Highlights Documentaries

    OCTOBER 2012 HIGHLIGHTS ** Denotes programs with artwork available on Investigation Discovery’s Press Website All Times ET // All airdates are subject to change INVESTIGATION DISCOVERY PRESS CONTACTS: Jordyn Linsk Charlotte Bigford Publicist Publicist 240-662-2421, [email protected] 240-662-3125, [email protected] DOCUMENTARIES ID FILMS: TELLING AMY’S STORY ** TV-PG (V) One-Hour Documentary Premieres Monday, October 8 at 7 PM ET By laying bare one woman's story and the many opportunities to alter its outcome, this October, Investigation Discovery commemorates Domestic Violence Awareness Month in the hope of educating, empowering, and even saving lives. On November 8, 2001, Amy Homan McGee was killed by her abusive husband of four years while her children waited outside in the car. Hosted by actress and advocate Mariska Hargitay, and told by Detective Deirdri Fishel, TELLING AMY’S STORY follows the timeline of the tragic domestic violence homicide that occurred in central Pennsylvania. The victim’s parents and co-workers, law enforcement officers, and court personnel share their perspectives on what happened to Amy in the weeks, months, and years leading up to her death. ID FILMS: WERNER HERZOG'S INTO THE ABYSS: A TALE OF LIFE, A TALE OF DEATH ** TV-14 Feature-Length Documentary Makes Its World TV Premiere on Tuesday, October 23 at 8 PM ET Werner Herzog’s INTO THE ABYSS debuted in September 2011 to rave reviews and festival buzz from Telluride to Toronto. Exploring the intricate details and emotional aftermath of a triple homicide in Conroe, Texas, Herzog sought to better understand the impact of life in prison and the shattering effects of the death penalty.
  • Same-Sex Marriage

    Same-Sex Marriage

    Relate policy position June 2014 Evidence suggests that hostile and unsupportive environments can lead to same-sex relationships being more likely to breakdown. Relate welcomes the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 as a positive step towards promoting equality and reducing institutional discrimination towards same-sex couples and their relationships. Relate aims to provide effective and inclusive services supporting same-sex couples at all stages of their relationships. www.relate.org.uk For decades Relate has offered services to same-sex and opposite-sex couples alike. We believe in supporting relationships of all types and promoting good quality, strong and stable relationships. We recognise the importance of equal legal recognition of relationships, and also note the negative impact that discrimination, including institutional discrimination, can have on same-sex couples’ well-being. As such we welcome the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 as a positive step towards promoting equality and reducing institutional discrimination directed towards same-sex couples and their relationships. 1. Relate believes in the importance of good quality, strong and stable relationships for both same-sex and opposite-sex couples alike. The evidence says that what matters most is the quality of relationships, not their legal form. 2. Relate believes that that same-sex couples should be able to have their relationships legally recognised if they choose to. This is important to combat stigma and promote a culture change where same-sex relationships are given equal value (to opposite sex relationships) and support is available for those in same sex relationships. 3. Relate aims to provide effective and inclusive services supporting relationships for every section of the community, including same-sex couples, at all stages of their relationships.
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of OHIO 2008 STATE of OHIO, Case No. 07

    IN the SUPREME COURT of OHIO 2008 STATE of OHIO, Case No. 07

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2008 STATE OF OHIO, Case No. 07-2424 Plaintiff-Appellee, On Appeal from the -vs- Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate District MARCUS DAVIS, Court of Appeals Defendant-Appellant Case No. 88895 MEMORANDUM OF AMICUS CURIAE FRANKLIN COUNTY PROSECUTOR RON O'BRIEN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE STATE OF OHIO'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION RON O'BRIEN 0017245 ROBERT L. TOBIK 0029286 Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney Cuyahoga County Public Defender STEVEN L. TAYLOR 0043876 PAUL A. KUZMINS 0074475 (Counsel of Record) (Counsel of Record) Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Assistant Public Defender SETH L. GILBERT 0072929 1200 West Third Street Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 100 Lakeside Place 373 South High Street, 13`h Floor Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Phone: 216/448-8388 Phone: 614/462-3555 Fax: 614/462-6103 Counsel for Defendant-Appellant E-mail: [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O'Brien WILLIAM D. MASON 0037540 Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney THORIN O. FREEMAN 0079999 (Counsel of Record) Assistant Prosecuting Attorney The Justice Center, 8th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Phone: 216/443-7800 Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellee State of Ohio MEMORANDUM OF AMICUS CURIAE FRANKLIN COUNTY PROSECUTOR RON O'BRIEN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE STATE OF OHIO'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION In State v. Colon, 118 Ohio St.3d 26, 2008-Ohio-1624 ("Colon P'), the defendant stood convicted on a robbery charge under R.C. 2911.02(A)(2), alleging that, in attempting or committing a theft offense or fleeing therefrom, defendant attempted, threatened, or actually inflicted physical harm on the victim.
  • CITY, UNIVERSITY of LONDON Section 28 and Black History Month

    CITY, UNIVERSITY of LONDON Section 28 and Black History Month

    CITY, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON Section 28 and Black History Month: public libraries after the new urban left Colette Townend January 2020 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MSc in Library Science Supervisor: Joseph Dunne-Howrie 1 Abstract The advent of Section 28 and Black History Month had very different initial impacts on British public library provision from 1987 onwards. Equal opportunities policies in new urban left local government of the earlier 1980s led to an increase of LGBT+ literature in libraries and schools, leading to the punitive Section 28 law, which would lead public libraries to self-censorship. The abolition of the GLC led to Black History Month (BHM) as a legacy of race and ethnic minority unit work. In library services today a historiography of Black and LGBT+ lives has been built through Black History Month and the corrective LGBT+ History Month (LGBTHM) respectively, with both being observed in modern day British local library services. Using desk research, surveys and in depth interviews with British public library workers about their experience of these phenomena of the 1980s, this dissertation investigates this history, recognises the work done by library workers and the results. Findings include the comparison of library services who stood up or fell to self-censorship under Section 28, as well as understanding BHM as a successful legacy of the new urban left’s LSPU and ultimately the value seen in BHM and LGBTHM by librarians today. 2 Contents: Abstract ..................................................................................................................................2
  • Legal Term for Cheating on Wife

    Legal Term for Cheating on Wife

    Legal Term For Cheating On Wife Is Vassili regular or crackpot after concupiscent Noe generate so awhile? Affordable Gordie untidies very round while Spike remains unbreeched and inspired. How peristomatic is Preston when hard-fisted and prepubescent Wit cackle some underbridge? The unsatisfied spouse cheated on discrimination is attorney for worry, wife on incurable insanity of up until they help When your spouse must be responsible for me at times, the terms favorable settlement. Cultural factors are legal questions are legal term. The intensity that in the outcome of the obligation. You from your letter, on legal term for cheating wife was the dependent spouse wins! We are legal action for legal cheating on wife. Child custody of legal term adultery is something to have terms you ask for you from voluntarily engages in this url into account. Focusing on your spouse cheats does not carry out. This is for spousal support. Imagine your reality, but a number of a petition seeking a person other. To legal term for my wife must show his. If you cheated with someone cheating wife cheats his legal term for adultery, is natural to you and think about outside in terms of. He finishes the similarities between a divorce case law may change their own home to a cheating on wife for legal term relationship to one of trust and pay in the original concept. If one does adultery laws that, it makes people cheat on your marital property. This cheating wife cheats his affection is termed in terms have. That one of. Our sleeves and harmony with your wife cheated with a relationship, emotional infidelity is.
  • The Boundaries of Vicarious Liability: an Economic Analysis of the Scope of Employment Rule and Related Legal Doctrines

    The Boundaries of Vicarious Liability: an Economic Analysis of the Scope of Employment Rule and Related Legal Doctrines

    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1987 The Boundaries of Vicarious Liability: An Economic Analysis of the Scope of Employment Rule and Related Legal Doctrines Alan O. Sykes Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Alan O. Sykes, "The Boundaries of Vicarious Liability: An Economic Analysis of the Scope of Employment Rule and Related Legal Doctrines," 101 Harvard Law Review 563 (1987). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOLUME 101 JANUARY 1988 NUMBER 3 HARVARD LAW REVIEW1 ARTICLES THE BOUNDARIES OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT RULE AND RELATED LEGAL DOCTRINES Alan 0. Sykes* 441TICARIOUS liability" may be defined as the imposition of lia- V bility upon one party for a wrong committed by another party.1 One of its most common forms is the imposition of liability on an employer for the wrong of an employee or agent. The imposition of vicarious liability usually depends in part upon the nature of the activity in which the wrong arises. For example, if an employee (or "servant") commits a tort within the ordinary course of business, the employer (or "master") normally incurs vicarious lia- bility under principles of respondeat superior. If the tort arises outside the "scope of employment," however, the employer does not incur liability, absent special circumstances.
  • Out of the Closet, Into the Lagom (?)

    Out of the Closet, Into the Lagom (?)

    Linköping University - Department of Culture and Society (IKOS) Master´s Thesis, 30 Credits – MA in Ethnic and Migration Studies (EMS) ISRN: LiU-IKOS/EMS--20/13--SE Out of the closet, into the lagom (?) Perceptions and Feelings of Inclusion, Exclusion, and Belonging among Queer Migrants in Sweden Froso Terzoglou Supervisor: Catrin Lundström ii CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................... V GLOSSARY........................................................................................................................... VI 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Aim and Research questions .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Delimitations and Limitations ........................................................................................................................ 2 2. CONTEXTUAL BACKGROUND AND CRITIQUES................................................. 4 2.1. Sweden and gender rights ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.2. The New (Labor) Migration Era ...................................................................................................................
  • July 25, 2019 NACDL OPPOSES AFFIRMATVE CONSENT

    July 25, 2019 NACDL OPPOSES AFFIRMATVE CONSENT

    July 25, 2019 NACDL OPPOSES AFFIRMATVE CONSENT RESOLUTION ABA RESOLUTION 114 NACDL opposes ABA Resolution 114. Resolution 114 urges legislatures to adopt affirmative consent requirements that re-define consent as: the assent of a person who is competent to give consent to engage in a specific act of sexual penetration, oral sex, or sexual contact, to provide that consent is expressed by words or action in the context of all the circumstances . The word “assent” generally refers to an express agreement. In addition the resolution dictates that consent must be “expressed by words or actions.” The resolution calls for a new definition of consent in sexual assault cases that would require expressed affirmative consent to every sexual act during the course of a sexual encounter. 1. Burden-Shifting in Violation of Due Process and Presumption of Innocence: NACDL opposes ABA Resolution 114 because it shifts the burden of proof by requiring an accused person to prove affirmative consent to each sexual act rather than requiring the prosecution to prove lack of consent. The resolution assumes guilt in the absence of any evidence regarding consent. This radical change in the law would violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and the Presumption of Innocence. It offends fundamental and well-established notions of justice. Specifically, Resolution 114 urges legislatures to re-define consent as “the assent of a person who is competent to give consent to engage in a specific act of sexual penetration, oral sex, or sexual contact, to provide that consent is expressed by words or action in the context of all the circumstances .
  • Insufficient Concern: a Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability

    Insufficient Concern: a Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability

    Insufficient Concern: A Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability Larry Alexandert INTRODUCTION Most criminal law theorists and the criminal codes on which they comment posit four distinct forms of criminal culpability: purpose, knowl- edge, recklessness, and negligence. Negligence as a form of criminal cul- pability is somewhat controversial,' but the other three are not. What controversy there is concerns how the lines between them should be drawn3 and whether there should be additional forms of criminal culpabil- ity besides these four.' My purpose in this Essay is to make the case for fewer, not more, forms of criminal culpability. Indeed, I shall try to demonstrate that pur- pose and knowledge can be reduced to recklessness because, like reckless- ness, they exhibit the basic moral vice of insufficient concern for the interests of others. I shall also argue that additional forms of criminal cul- pability are either unnecessary, because they too can be subsumed within recklessness as insufficient concern, or undesirable, because they punish a character trait or disposition rather than an occurrent mental state. Copyright © 2000 California Law Review, Inc. California Law Review, Incorporated (CLR) is a California nonprofit corporation. CLR and the authors are solely responsible for the content of their publications. f Warren Distinguished Professor of Law, University of San Diego. I wish to thank all the participants at the Symposium on The Morality of Criminal Law and its honoree, Sandy Kadish, for their comments and criticisms, particularly Leo Katz and Stephen Morse, who gave me comments prior to the event, and Joshua Dressler, whose formal Response was generous, thoughtful, incisive, and prompt.
  • Comptons of Soho

    Comptons of Soho

    Q-X clubs t bars t cabaret t life No 1093 18 February 2016 EST. 1986 18 Suitable only for persons of 18 years and over QX wishes the Grande Dame a Happy 30th! RYNBHB[JOFDPNtRYHBZMPOEPO QX_1093_Cover.indd 1 16/02/2016 18:43 Comptons of Soho 30 YEARS AT THE HEART OF GAY SOHO As we celebrate the Grand Dame of Soho’s 30th birthday as an offical gay venue, we have a chat with some of her nearest and dearest. They know her best and they, in addition to their hundreds of regulars, make her what she is. Happy Birthday old girl! Neil Hodgson, Landlord Comptons as a gay bar was evolving long before the 1980’s and there are reports of metropolitan police warnings about sodomy on the premises as early as the 1940’s. It was 1986 that bar was officially declared as gay. I’ve been fortunate enough to have been General Manager here for 17 of those 30 years. Together we have witnessed and survived a lot together, bombings, hate crimes, riots, the loss of some very special people and places over the years including an economic recession and the ongoing gentrification of Soho. Despite my keenness to dress up in uniforms I still only very much remain a caretaker of an institution that belongs to the people that support it also who have made it the solid institution it is today and still she continues to grow. Comptons to me is a real place and its people, it’s also my work and my home.
  • Alcohol: Why It's Not an Excuse

    Alcohol: Why It's Not an Excuse

    We End Violence Handout #1 Alcohol: Why it’s not an excuse “If we were both drunk, then how could I have raped her?” The answers: If you are drunk and choose to drive resulting in an accident that hurts someone, should you be held accountable? Hell, yes! When you get drunk, will you stick your penis in a pencil sharpener or in the window of a police car? Probably not. Why? Because you have made the decision ahead of time to never ever do that because it would hurt. So why can’t men learn to not place our penises in or on women who are not con - senting? If we as men make that decision before we drink, just like the decision to not maul our penis in a pencil sharpener… Then it won’t happen when we are drunk! Women do not report rapes or feel they have been raped after consensual “drunk” sex. They do report rape after their bodies have been violated. Being drunk does not cause men to rape. However, society does set men up to think they have certain rights to sex. Assumptions men make while sober carry over when they are drunk. Both sober and drunk men use invalid excuses such as a woman wearing revealing clothing or behaving flirtatiously as reasons for assault. BUT REGARDLESS of whether a person is drunk or sober, NONE of these ridiculous excuses make the act of rape acceptable. Men do not have a right to sex no matter how drunk they are or how drunk the woman is! It is men’s responsi - bility to understand this and be responsible for their actions.