Investigating Second Seminole War Sites in Florida: Identification Through Limited Testing Christine Bell University of South Florida

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigating Second Seminole War Sites in Florida: Identification Through Limited Testing Christine Bell University of South Florida University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 11-19-2004 Investigating Second Seminole War Sites in Florida: Identification Through Limited Testing Christine Bell University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Bell, Christine, "Investigating Second Seminole War Sites in Florida: Identification Through Limited Testing" (2004). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/952 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Investigating Second Seminole War Sites in Florida: Identification Through Limited Testing by Christine Bell A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Brent R. Weisman, Ph.D. Robert H. Tykot, Ph.D. E. Christian Wells, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 19, 2004 Keywords: Historical archaeology, artifact dating, military forts, correspondence analysis, homesteads © Copyright 2004, Christine Bell i Acknowledgements None of this work would be possible without the support of family, friends, and the wonderful volunteers who helped at our sites. Thank you to Debbie Roberson, Lori Collins, and my committee members Dr. Weisman, Dr. Wells, and Dr. Tykot. I couldn’t have made it through grad school without Toni, and Belle, and even Mel. A special thanks to Walter for inspiring me from the start. ii Table of Contents List of Tables ...................................................................................... iii List of Figures......................................................................................iv Abstract .............................................................................................. vi Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................ 1 Chapter 2. Historical Review .............................................................. .8 The Seminoles.......................................................................... 8 The Military Presence ............................................................. 11 Fort Dade..................................................................... 16 The Armed Occupation Act..................................................... 22 Chapter 3. Previous Archaeology ...................................................... 24 Historic Seminole Archaeology ............................................... 24 Artifact Summary for Seminole sites............................. 25 Second Seminole War Forts................................................... 26 Artifact Summary for Fort and Battlefield sites.............. 31 Second Seminole Era Homesteads ........................................ 31 Discussion .............................................................................. 32 Chapter 4. Research Designs and Methods...................................... 34 Fort Dade................................................................................ 34 Methods.................................................................................. 35 The Hope Homestead Site...................................................... 41 Chapter 5. Fort Dade Results and Discussion................................... 46 Ceramic Analysis .................................................................... 46 Tobacco Pipe Analysis............................................................ 48 Glass Analysis ........................................................................ 50 Nail Analysis ........................................................................... 53 Nail Distribution............................................................ 57 Miscellaneous Metal Artifacts ................................................. 59 i Gunflints.................................................................................. 60 Personal Items........................................................................ 61 Discussion .............................................................................. 64 Chapter 6. Hope Homestead Results and Discussion....................... 65 Ceramic Analysis .................................................................... 65 Glass Analysis ........................................................................ 65 Flat glass ..................................................................... 68 Nail and Metal Analysis........................................................... 69 Other Items............................................................................. 71 Discussion .............................................................................. 71 Chapter 7. Quantitative Analysis ...................................................... .72 Sample Selection.................................................................... 72 South’s Artifact Patterns ......................................................... 73 Discussion .............................................................................. 74 Correspondence Analysis ....................................................... 75 Discussion .............................................................................. 79 Cluster Analysis ..................................................................... .82 Discussion .............................................................................. 83 Summary ................................................................................ 83 Chapter 8. Conclusions and Recommendations ............................... 86 Hope Homestead.................................................................... 86 Fort Dade................................................................................ 88 References ........................................................................................ 92 Appendices.........................................................................................vii Appendix A: Fort Dade Artifacts..............................................viii Appendix B: Hope Homestead Artifacts..................................xvi ii List of Tables Table 1. Pennyweight nail classification ............................................ 56 Table 2. Moir formula for dating flat glass.......................................... 68 Table 3. Comparison with South’s Artifact Patterns........................... 74 Table 4. Percentage of artifacts by site ............................................. 75 Table 5. Brainerd-Robinson coefficients............................................ 80 iii List of Figures Figure 1. Study area........................................................................... .2 Figure 2. Second Seminole War military sites ................................... 12 Figure 3. Prince map of Fort Foster................................................... 18 Figure 4. Dragoons at the Withlacoochee ......................................... 19 Figure 5. Second Seminole War sites ............................................... 27 Figure 6. Fort Dade site map............................................................. 38 Figure 7. Burned wood and charcoal, Unit 2, Fort Dade.................... 40 Figure 8. Hope Homestead, mid-1800s............................................. 42 Figure 9. Hand-drawn profile map .................................................... .43 Figure 10. Photoprofile ...................................................................... 44 Figure 11. Simple photoprofile........................................................... 45 Figure 12. Ceramics from Fort Dade ................................................. 47 Figure 13. Pipe bowl pieces from Fort Dade...................................... 49 Figure 14. Pipe distribution by section, Fort Dade............................. 49 Figure 15. Pipe stem sections from Fort Dade .................................. 50 Figure 16. Bottle finished from Fort Dade.......................................... 52 Figure 17. The four categories of nail types ...................................... 54 Figure 18. Four inch spike from T4, Fort Dade.................................. 57 iv Figure 19. Assortment of nails and spikes from Fort Dade................ 58 Figure 20. Nail distribution by unit, Fort Dade ................................... 59 Figure 21. Metal artifacts from Fort Dade .......................................... 60 Figure 22. Musket gunflints from Fort Dade ...................................... 61 Figure 23. Pencil leads ...................................................................... 62 Figure 24. Carved bone fork handle, Unit 4, Fort Dade..................... 63 Figure 25. Two-tined fork dated 1760-1800....................................... 63 Figure 26. Hope Homestead ceramics .............................................. 66 Figure 27. Ink bottle from Hope Homestead...................................... 67 Figure 28. Skeleton key, fish hook, lamp wick wheel......................... 70 Figure 29. Doorknob, Trench A, Hope Homestead............................ 70 Figure 30. Correspondence Analysis................................................. 77 Figure 31. Cluster Analysis using Ward’s method
Recommended publications
  • The Seminole Indian Wars (1814-1858)
    THE SEMINOLE INDIAN WARS (1814-1858) Compiled by Brian Brindle Version 0.1 © 2013 Dadi&Piombo This supplement was designed to the cover three small American wars fought between 1814-1858 known today as the “Seminole Wars”. These Wars were primary gorilla style wars fought between the Seminole Indians and the U.S. army . The wars played out in a series of small battles and skirmishes as U.S. Army chased bands of Seminole worriers through the swamps IofN Florida. THE DARK In 1858 the U.S. declared the third war ended - though no peace treaty was ever signed. It is interesting to note that to this day the Seminole Tribe of Florida is the only native American tribe who have never signed a peace treaty with the U.S. Govern- ment. This Supplement allows for some really cool hit and run skirmishing in the dense The Seminole Wars and Vietnam are one vegetation and undergrowth of the Florida of the few confrontations that the U.S. swamps. It also allow s for small engage- Army have engaged in that they did not ments of small groups of very cunning definitively win. natives, adept in using the terrain to its best advantage fighting a larger, more HISTORICAL BACKGROUND clumsy, conventional army. In the early 18th century, bands of Muskogean-speaking Lower Creek In many ways Seminole War echoes the migrated to Florida from Georgia. They Vietnam War, both were guerrilla wars became known as the Seminole (liter- involving patrols out constantly, trying ally “separatists”). Floridian territory was to locate and eliminate an elusive enemy.
    [Show full text]
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • PETITION Ror,RECOGNITION of the FLORIDA TRIBE Or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS
    'l PETITION rOR,RECOGNITION OF THE FLORIDA TRIBE or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS TH;: FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS and the Administra­ tive Council, THE NORTHWEST FLORIDA CREEK INDIAN COUNCIL brings this, thew petition to the DEPARTMENT Or THE INTERIOR OF THE FEDERAL GOVERN- MENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and prays this honorable nation will honor their petition, which is a petition for recognition by this great nation that THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS is an Indian Tribe. In support of this plea for recognition THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS herewith avers: (1) THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS nor any of its members, is the subject of Congressional legislation which has expressly terminated or forbidden the Federal relationship sought. (2) The membership of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS is composed principally of persons who are not members of any other North American Indian tribe. (3) A list of all known current members of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS, based on the tribes acceptance of these members and the tribes own defined membership criteria is attached to this petition and made a part of it. SEE APPENDIX----- A The membership consists of individuals who are descendants of the CREEK NATION which existed in aboriginal times, using and occuping this present georgraphical location alone, and in conjunction with other people since that time. - l - MNF-PFD-V001-D0002 Page 1of4 (4) Attached herewith and made a part of this petition is the present governing Constitution of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEKS INDIANS.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort King National Historic Landmark Education Guide 1 Fig5
    Ai-'; ~,,111m11l111nO FORTKINO NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK Fig1 EDUCATION GUIDE This guide was made possible by the City of Ocala Florida and the Florida Department of State/Division of Historic Resources WELCOME TO Micanopy WE ARE EXCITED THAT YOU HAVE CHOSEN Fort King National Historic Fig2 Landmark as an education destination to shed light on the importance of this site and its place within the Seminole War. This Education Guide will give you some tools to further educate before and after your visit to the park. The guide gives an overview of the history associated with Fort King, provides comprehension questions, and delivers activities to Gen. Thomas Jesup incorporate into the classroom. We hope that this resource will further Fig3 enrich your educational experience. To make your experience more enjoyable we have included a list of items: • Check in with our Park Staff prior to your scheduled visit to confrm your arrival time and participation numbers. • The experience at Fort King includes outside activities. Please remember the following: » Prior to coming make staff aware of any mobility issues or special needs that your group may have. » Be prepared for the elements. Sunscreen, rain gear, insect repellent and water are recommended. » Wear appropriate footwear. Flip fops or open toed shoes are not recommended. » Please bring lunch or snacks if you would like to picnic at the park before or after your visit. • Be respectful of our park staff, volunteers, and other visitors by being on time. Abraham • Visitors will be exposed to different cultures and subject matter Fig4 that may be diffcult at times.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminole Wars Heritage Trail
    Central Gulf Coast Archaeological Society 41 YEARS OF PROMOTING FLORIDA’S RICH HERITAGE CGCAS IS A CHAPTER OF THE FLORIDA ANTHROPOLOGICAL SOCIETY Newsletter | OCTOBER 2019 | Thursday, October 17th, 7pm Adventures in Downtown Tampa Archaeology- The Lost Fort Brooke Cemetery and 100-Year-Old Love Letters to the Steamer Gopher Eric Prendergast, MA RPA, Senior Staff Archaeologist, Cardno Almost everywhere you dig in southern downtown Tampa, near the water front, there are some remains from the infamous military installation that gave rise to the town of Tampa in the early 1800s. It has long been known that Fort Brooke had two cemeteries, but only one of them was ever found and excavated in the 1980s. Recent excavations across downtown Tampa have focused on the hunt for the second lost cemetery, among many other components of the fort. While testing the model designed to locate the cemetery, a sealed jar was discovered, crammed full of letters written in 1916. The letters were mailed to someone aboard C. B. Moore’s steamer Gopher, while the ship completed it’s 1916 expedition on the Mississippi River. What were they doing buried in a parking lot in Tampa? Eric is a transplant from the northeast who has only lived in Tampa since 2012, when he came to graduate school at USF. Since then he has worked in CRM and has recently served as Principal Investigator for major excavations in Downtown Tampa and for the Zion Cemetery Project, Robles Park Village. The monthly CGCAS Archaeology Lecture series is sponsored by the Alliance for Weedon Island Archaeological Research and Education (AWIARE) and held at the Weedon Island Preserve Cultural and Natural History Center in St Petersburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Savage Foes, Noble Warriors, and Frail Remnants: Florida Seminoles in the White Imagination, 1865-1934
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository Savage Foes, Noble Warriors, and Frail Remnants: Florida Seminoles in the White Imagination, 1865-1934 Mikaëla M. Adams A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2009 Approved by: Dr. Theda Perdue Dr. Michael D. Green Dr. Kathleen DuVal Abstract Mikaëla M. Adams: Savage Foes, Noble Warriors, and Frail Remnants: Florida Seminoles in the White Imagination, 1865-1934 (Under the direction of Theda Perdue and Michael D. Green) Between the Civil War and the 1930s, white impressions of Seminoles changed as Anglo-Americans encountered new pressures of urbanization, modernization, and immigration. Their initial impression of the Indians as “savage foes” came as a legacy of three Seminole wars and white insecurity about their ability to dominate the wilds of Florida. Over time, more positive images of the Seminoles emerged as Americans dealt with national reunification and the arrival of new immigrants. In this context, the Seminoles appeared as “noble warriors” whose brave resistance served as a model for American patriotism. Yet, as railroad construction and Everglade drainage opened Florida to non-Indian settlement, Anglo-Americans began to view the Seminoles as “frail remnants” of a once-glorious past. Seeing the Indians as doomed to extinction, whites tried to protect them as an “endangered species” by securing reservation lands. Thus, Anglo-American representations of the Seminoles not only reflected their own cultural concerns but also influenced government policy in Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Florida Castillo De San Marcos National Monument Second Seminole War, 1835-1842 St
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Territorial Florida Castillo de San Marcos National Monument Second Seminole War, 1835-1842 St. Augustine, Florida ( Seminole Indians, c. 1870 Southern Migration The original native inhabitants of Florida had all but disappeared by 1700. European diseases and the losses from nearly constant colonial warfare had reduced the population to a mere handful. Bands from various tribes in the southeastern United States pressured by colonial expansion began moving into the unoccupied lands in Florida. These primarily Creek tribes were called Cimarrones by the Spanish “strays” or “wanderers.” This is the probable origin of the name Seminole. Runaway slaves or “Maroons” also began making their way into Florida where they were regularly granted freedom by the Spanish. Many joined the Indian villages and integrated into the tribes. Early Conflict During the American Revolution the British, who controlled Florida from 1763 to 1784, recruited the Seminoles to raid rebel frontier settlements in Georgia. Both sides engaged in a pattern of border raiding and incursion which continued sporadically even after Florida returned to Spanish control after the war. Despite the formal treaties ending the war the Seminoles remained enemies of the new United States. Growing America At the beginning of the 19th century the rapidly growing American population was pushing onto the frontiers in search of new land. Many eyes turned southward to the Spanish borderlands of Florida and Texas. Several attempts at “filibustering,” private or semi-official efforts to forcibly take territory, occurred along the frontiers. The Patriot War of 1812 was one such failed American effort aimed at taking East Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creek "Migration Legend"
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Dancing Breath: Ceremonial Performance Practice, Environment, and Personhood in a Muskogee Creek Community Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2qm3x2bd Author Koons, Ryan Abel Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Dancing Breath: Ceremonial Performance Practice, Environment, and Personhood in a Muskogee Creek Community A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Ethnomusicology by Ryan Abel Koons 2016 © Copyright by Ryan Abel Koons 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Dancing Breath: Ceremonial Performance Practice, Environment, and Personhood in a Muskogee Creek Community by Ryan Abel Koons Doctor of Philosophy in Ethnomusicology University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Tara Browner, Chair This dissertation presents an ethnography utilizing a multispecies perspective of the "busk" ritual cycle as performed by the southeastern Muskogee Creek American Indian community, Pvlvcekolv (Apalachicola). Humans construct humanity and personhood partially via interactions with other-than-human persons, such as animals, plants, and objects. I examine ritualized interactions between humans and others-than-human in a southeastern Indigenous "natureculture," exploring the intersections of ontology, personhood, and performance practice. Pvlvcekolv, an animistic Florida-based tribal town with a ceremonial Fire that pre-dates European Contact, maintains a centuries-old ritual tradition, the busk. Sometimes known as "Green Corn Ceremonialism," many Native communities share this tradition, including ii Cherokee, Chickasaw, Seminole, Yuchi, and other Creek peoples historically and in the present day. Performing the songs, dances, and ritual actions of the busk places participants into dialogue with other-than-human persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Are the Seminole People? by Willard Steele
    Who are the Seminole People? by Willard Steele The Seminole people are the descendents of the Creek people, and the Creek people are the descendents of the Lamar peoples. The ancestral lands of both the Lamar and Creek cultures encompassed parts of Alabama, Georgia, Florida, North and South Carolina, and Tennessee. The Lamar period lasted from about 1350 until 1700. The descendents of the Lamar peoples became the historic nations known as the Creeks and Cherokees. The Creek Nation was created through a gradual process of assimilation. This continued into historic times. Remnants of the Westo (Yuchi), Apalachee and Yemassee Tribes were absorbed by the tribe after their defeats by the English. The Creek were unlike any other tribe in that it can be said that, in the southeast, there were the Chickasaw, the Cherokee, the Choctaw- and everyone else was a Creek. The nation was a confederation of dozens of towns. The diversity of the Tribe is reflected in the fact that it's members spoke seven languages-- Muscogee, Hitchiti, Koasati, Alabama, Natchez, Yuchi and Shawnee. The first five are dialects of Muskogean. The early history of the Creek people in Florida is not well understood. While most people think of the Creeks as having come into Florida after 1700, this is not true. The Apalache were a Hitchiti speaking people that may have been related to the Creel Tamathli or Apalachicola. The Apalache, situated along the Apalachicola River, were in Florida at the time of Spanish contact. At the same time, another Hitchiti speaking Creek group, the Sawokli, were located at Choctawhatchee Bay, on the Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Peck Sink Storm Water Park Design Project Area in Hernando County, Florida
    CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF THE PECK SINK STORM WATER PARK DESIGN PROJECT AREA IN HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared for: Hernando County Board of County Commissioners 20 North Main Street Brooksville, Florida 34601 By: Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 Joan Deming - Project Manager Elizabeth A. Horvath and Lee Hutchinson - Project Archaeologists Justin Winkler and Nelson Rodriguez - Archaeologists In Association with: King Engineering Associates, Inc. 4921 Memorial Highway, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33634 September 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) conducted a cultural resource assessment survey (CRAS) of the approximately 111-acre Peck Sink Storm Water Park Design project area (hereinafter referred to as Peck Sink) in Hernando County, Florida in June and July 2009. The purpose of this survey was to locate and identify any cultural resources within the project area, and to assess their significance in terms of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). This survey was conducted for the Hernando County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), and complies with Hernando County’s Comprehensive Plan (effective February 2006). This report also complies with Chapters 267 and 373, Florida Statutes (FS), Florida’s Coastal Management Program, and implementing state regulations regarding possible impact to significant historical properties. This report conforms to the specifications set forth in Chapter 1A-46, Florida Administrative Code (FAC) (revised August 21, 2002) and the Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual (Florida Division of Historical Resources [FDHR] 2003). Background research and a review of the Florida Master Site File (FMSF) and NRHP indicated that no archaeological sites have been recorded previously within the Peck Sink property.
    [Show full text]
  • National American Indian and Alaska Native Heritage Month 2009
    National American Indian and Alaska Native Heritage Month 2009 Information, Lessons, Activities, and Resources Division of Social Sciences and Life Skills November 2009 P a g e | 1 The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida Dr. Solomon C. Stinson, Chair Dr. Marta Pérez, Vice Chair Mr. Agustin J. Barrera Mr. Renier Diaz de la Portilla Dr. Lawrence S. Feldman Ms. Perla Tabares Hantman Dr. Wilbert “Tee” Holloway Dr. Martin Karp Ms. Ana Rivas Logan Ms. Eboni Finley Student Advisor Alberto M. Carvalho Superintendent of Schools Ms. Milagros R. Fornell Associate Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction Dr. Maria P. de Armas Assistant Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction, K-12 Core Curriculum Mr. John R. Doyle Administrative Director Division of Social Sciences and Life Skills P a g e | 2 Table of Contents I. American Indian Heritage Month – A Brief History II. Readings/Resources for Teachers and Students Facts About American Indians Today American Indians by the Numbers – From Census 2000 Civil Rights and Native Americans Indian Removal – 1814-1858 Reservations American Indian vs. Native American Are You Teaching the True Thanksgiving Story? Historic Florida Indians American Indian Culture Groups Map Ideas for Teaching About Native Americans III. Lesson Plans for Teachers of Elementary Students American Indian Stereotypes (Grades 4-5) Florida’s Native Americans (Grades 4-5) Where Did Florida’s Native Americans Live? (Grades 4-5) IV. Lesson Plans for Teachers of Secondary Students American Indian Stereotypes (Grades 6-12) American Indians by the Numbers (Grades 6-12) American Indian Culture Groups (Grades 6-12) Trail of Tears (Grade 8) American Indian Reservation System (Grade 11) P a g e | 3 V.
    [Show full text]
  • YDPHC Physical Activity Guide 1.2019
    ──── Acton Alfred Arundel Berwick Biddeford Buxton Cornish Dayton Eliot Hollis Kennebunk Kennebunkport Kittery Lebanon Limerick Limington Lyman YORK COUNTY Newfield North Berwick PHYSICAL ACTIVITY Ogunquit Old Orchard Beach RESOURCE GUIDE Parsonsfield Saco Sanford Brought to you by: Shapleigh South Berwick Waterboro Wells York ──── The York District Public Health Council (YDPHC) is excited to present a Physical Activity Resource guide that includes all 29 communities of York County. This guide has been updated from the former York County Physical Activity Resource Guide from 2015. YDPHC is a representative, district-wide body formed in partnership with the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention (MeCDC) to engage in collaborative planning and decision-making for the delivery of the Ten Essential Public Health Services in the York Public Health District. The York Public Health District includes all communities in York County. Our mission is to promote, improve, sustain, and advocate for the delivery of the essential public health services in York County. We recognize that this guide does not represent ALL the activities available to residents of York County. We aim to highlight free and public resources available to all. Many other options are available for your wellness needs. We encourage you to let us know if there is something that we missed. Our hope is that this resource guide will be useful to you and encourage physical activity among all members of your family. Use this guide only as intended - as a guide. As with any physical activity, there may be risks associated. Work within your own limits. It is your responsibility to determine if a new activity is right for you and your family.
    [Show full text]