DOCSLIB.ORG

9 Dunn Street, Richmond

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Port Phillip Planning Scheme Amendment C161port Heritage Overlay HO5 Subject Site: Nos. 5 and 9 Havelock Street St Kilda Expert Heritage Evidence Prepared for Meydan By Robyn Riddett Director Anthemion Consultancies POB18183 Collins Street East Melbourne 8003 Tel. +61 3 9495 6389 Email: [email protected] January, 2021 Nos. 5 and 9 Havelock Street, St Kilda 1.0 Introduction 1. I have been instructed by Rigby Cooke, on behalf of Meydan, to prepare expert heritage evidence which addresses the proposed change to the grading of No. 5 Havelock Street, St Kilda as a consequence of Amendment C161port and the existing grading of No. 9 Havelock Street, St Kilda. In response to the Amendment, Meydan submitted, inter alia, that both places should be removed from the Heritage Overlay i.e. HO5 the St Kilda Hill Precinct, St Kilda. In “Section 3 – Submissions raising objections and requesting changes – submissions all proposed to be included in C161port – Part 2” of Council’s Summary of Submissions and Recommended Responses (pp. 70 – 71) Council’s response to Meydan is viz.: Strategic importance of site Noted. Council officers have previously engaged in conversations with Meydan Group about the potential to redevelop the Cosmopolitan Hotel at this site within the existing planning controls and have provided without prejudice comments on noncompliant proposals. In line with previous advice provided to the Meydan Group, a review of the planning controls and potential contribution of this site to the St Kilda Activity Centre (noting the site is located at the edge of the Acland Street retail strip and is within the General Residential Zone) is outside the scope of this amendment and would be more appropriately explored as part of the development of the St Kilda Activity Centre structure plan. It is recommended that Meydan Group be consulted through the structure planning process to explore opportunities for this site. Regrading of 3 Havelock Street Agreed that 3 Havelock Street is a car park. Council officers recommend Amendment C161port be amended to include a further correction of the heritage grading of 3 Havelock Street from ‘Significant’ to ‘Non-contributory’. Removal of 5 and 9 Havelock Street from Heritage Overlay Amendment C161port has been prepared to make technical corrections and updates, including a series of heritage updates to controls in the Port Phillip Planning Scheme. The current grading of 5 Havelock Street as a ‘Contributory’ heritage place has been identified as an anomaly, having regard to an assessment of its intactness and integrity compared to other similar properties within the precinct as outlined in the Port Phillip Heritage Review Update, the strategic document underpinning this change. On that basis, a ‘Significant’ heritage place grading is considered appropriate and recommended to be applied through the amendment. 9 Havelock Street is not proposed to be affected by this amendment, and the changes requested by the submitter are considered to be outside the scope of this amendment. It is acknowledged that there is a degree of fragmentation along Havelock Street and officers consider that a review of the significance of these places and contribution to the precinct would be more appropriately considered as part of a strategic review of the Heritage Overlay 5 precinct. This is scheduled for a subsequent year under Council’s Heritage Program. Anthemion Consultancies 1 Nos. 5 and 9 Havelock Street Amendment C161port Panel Hearing St Kilda Recommended position / changes: Amendment C161port be amended to include a further correction to amend the heritage grading of 3 Havelock Street from ‘Significant’ to ‘NonContributory’ inside HO5. 2. Presently No. 5 Havelock Street is graded as Contributory and is proposed to be graded “Significant”. No. 9 Havelock Street is graded Contributory and no change is proposed at this time. 3. The City of Port Phillip commissioned a Port Phillip Heritage Review Update, prepared by David Helms Heritage Planning in February 2019, and which recommended the proposed changes. Figure 1 Location map. Source: Melways. 1.1 Reference Materials 4. Other than as referenced below, I have read: Planning Panels Victoria. Guide to Expert Evidence. Port Phillip Heritage Review. Volume 1. C161port – Part 1 Adoption version [of Version 32, July 2020] September, 2020. Amendment C181port. Exhibited documentation. Sands and McDougall. Directories. 1875 – 1898. 1.2 Constraints 5. Research has been undertaken at the State Library of Victoria but in circumstances where visits and visitors are limited due to the COVID 19 pandemic. This research was principally related to the Sands and McDougall. Directories. 6. Access to other sources such as maps was not possible by the date on which evidence is due to be served. Similarly the St Kilda Rate Books could not be accessed. They are not held at the St Kilda Library and the Port Phillip Heritage Centre is closed and as of 14 January there is no date proposed for re-opening. While St Kilda Rate Book information has Anthemion Consultancies 2 Nos. 5 and 9 Havelock Street Amendment C161port Panel Hearing St Kilda been put into the Ancestry Database, searches are by name not address and there is no information regarding rates and dates of entries which would shed light on the date of construction of buildings. While the Rate Books are at the Public Record Office access is severely limited in terms of timed sessions and number of persons allowed to be in the reading room. However, a session has been booked for 18 January. Appropriate repositories at the University of Melbourne remain closed. 7. Last but not least a significant Internet failure limited on-line research. 8. Research will continue at the above repositories and the results will be submitted by way of an addendum to my evidence. It is not expected that any results will change my opinions. 1.3 Site Inspection and Location 9. I have undertaken an inspection of the site from the street on two occasions. I have also undertake a drive-by survey of HO5 the St Kilda Hill Precinct. Figure 2 No. 5 Havelock Street, St Kilda. 1.2 Qualifications and Expertise 10. I am a director and principal of Anthemion Consultancies and am also an architectural historian, an interior designer and a heritage consultant. I was a graduate architect member of the Royal Australian Institute of Architects, was a Deputy Chair of the Institute’s (Victorian Chapter) Heritage Committee and a member of the AIA Awards Jury in the Conservation Section for the years 2000-01. I was at Lovell Chen, architects and heritage consultants for approximately 18 years and most of that time as an associate director. Within that practice and presently my responsibilities include the co-ordination and preparation of conservation management plans, heritage assessments, preparation of expert evidence, development of site interpretation and the restoration of historic interiors. 11. I am also a Past President of Australia ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites), and presently the Secretary and the Treasurer, of the ICOMOS International Anthemion Consultancies 3 Nos. 5 and 9 Havelock Street Amendment C161port Panel Hearing St Kilda Scientific Committee on Risk Preparedness (ICORP); past Secretary-General of the ICOMOS Scientific Council; inaugural convenor of Blue Shield Australia and past member of the Board, and past Board member of Blue Shield (The Hague) and current Board member and immediate past Secretary of AusHeritage. I completed my term as a member of the Local Government Specialist Committee which is a committee of the Victorian Heritage Council. In the past I was a long-standing councillor of the National Trust of Australia (Victoria). 12. I have been a heritage adviser in Monash and Bayside and am presently a member of the Yarra Heritage Panel. I have provided expert witness statements on similar matters on numerous occasions at Heritage Victoria, VCAT, the Building Appeals Board, Planning Panels Victoria and other similar forae on behalf of councils, objectors and developers. My Curriculum vitæ is appended. 1.3 Summary of Opinions 13. In my opinion the grading of No. 5 Havelock Street, St Kilda should not be changed from Contributory to Significant. There is no information in the Port Phillip Heritage Review Version 32 which would provide a basis for the place to be Significant and no information has been advanced in Amendment C161port. 14. There is nothing in the Port Phillip Heritage Review Version 32 Environmental History or the precinct citation which comments on the importance or otherwise of timber dwellings, or indeed even mentions them; there is no mention in the existing precinct citation of the flat area and the working classes, and therefore any attributed importance to them, as compared with the wealthy citizens on the hill; and no augmentations have been proposed in Amendment C161port. 15. Despite the methodological statement in the Port Phillip Heritage Review Update Final report that any review of the heritage grading of a place will “have regard to the definitions of Significant, Contributory and Non Contributory in the Port Phillip Local Heritage Policy, Clause 22.04”, in my opinion the definitions have not been applied appropriately. It is evident that the subject site accords with the definition of a Contributory heritage place and not a Significant heritage place. It appears that reliance has been placed on the integrity and intactness of the place rather than an appropriate assessment against the actual definition. 16. Council has acknowledged that a review of the significance of places and contribution to the precinct (St Kilda Hill) would be more appropriately considered as part of a strategic review of the Heritage Overlay 5 precinct and I agree that with this. Any consideration of any change of grading to No. 5 Havelock Street should be deferred until such work can be undertaken.
Recommended publications
  • PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Expert Heritage Evidence

    PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Expert Heritage Evidence

    PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C365 Heritage Overlay HO1205 Subject Site: “Chart House”, No. 372 - 378 Little Bourke Street Melbourne Expert Heritage Evidence Prepared for Berjaya Developments Pty Ltd By Robyn Riddett Director Anthemion Consultancies POB18183 Collins Street East Melbourne 8003 Tel. +61 3 9495 6389 Email: [email protected] December 2019 “Chart House” No. 372 - 378 Little Bourke Street, Melbourne 1.0 Introduction 1. I have been instructed by Best Hooper, on behalf of Berjaya Developments Pty Ltd, to prepare expert heritage evidence which addresses the heritage aspects of the proposal to grade the site as “Contibutory”, as a consequence of the Guildford and Hardware Laneways Heritage Study prepared by Lovell Chen in May 2017, as a consequence of Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C365. 2. The previous Property Schedule included in the Guildford & Hardware Laneways Precinct Citation graded the building as Contributory. In effect it graded the east wall abutting Niagara Lane but not the façade addressing Little Bourke Street which Lovell Chen had indicated was not of any significance. Subsequently the Amendment C271 Panel recommended that “Chart House” be included within HO1205 with a Non-contributory grading. When HO1205 came into effect on 12 August 2019, No. 372 – 378 Little Bourke Street was included within HO1205 but with a Contributory, rather than with a Non- contributory grading and on an interim basis as a consequence of Amendment C355melb. This change in grading appears to have been influenced by correspondence from Melbourne Heritage Action which put forward new information about “Chart House”. It is now proposed, as a consequence of Amendment C365melb, to include No.
  • Ordinary Meeting of Council 18 March 2020

    Ordinary Meeting of Council 18 March 2020

    ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL 18 MARCH 2020 14.6 AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MUSIC - LEASE PROPOSAL FOR SOUTH MELBOURNE TOWN HALL EXECUTIVE MEMBER: CHRIS CARROLL, GENERAL MANAGER, CUSTOMER AND CORPORATE SERVICES PREPARED BY: ANTHONY SAVENKOV, HEAD OF PROPERTY PROJECTS 1. PURPOSE 1.1 To outline an assessment of a proposal from the Australian National Academy of Music (ANAM) to lease the South Melbourne Town Hall, and to recommend a response to that proposal. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 The Town Hall is an extraordinarily significant building – a grand architectural presence that shapes the character of Emerald Hill, helps tell the story of the City’s history, and provides a focal point for community gatherings and events, including musical concerts. It is an irreplaceable asset. 2.2 Due to its limited functionality, the local government reforms of the 1990s, and the subsequent expansion and upgrading of the St Kilda Town Hall, the South Melbourne Town Hall serves a far more limited civic role than it once did – at least in the sense of a home for government and public services. 2.3 The most fundamental way to ensure its ongoing place in the community is for it to be used sustainably and to its potential. This is irrespective of who manages it. 2.4 Sustainable uses of the building are limited. For a tenant it has many positive features and attributes – such as its large total floorspace and architectural appeal. Countering this however, are its archaic and inefficient layout, high operating costs, poor natural light, limited views, no off-street parking, and its location outside the suburb’s central activity areas (of Clarendon Street, South Melbourne Market).
  • Robyn Riddett Director

    Robyn Riddett Director

    PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Greater Bendigo Amendment C234 Heritage Overlay HO 915 Subject site: 40 Harley Street Strathdale Nanga Gnulle Expert Heritage Report Prepared for Jing Ying Pty Ltd (Submitter 12) By Robyn Riddett Director Anthemion Consultancies POB18183 Collins Street East Melbourne 8003 Tel. +61 3 9495 6389 Email: [email protected] May 2018 Nanga Gnulle, 40 Harley Street, Strathdale 1.0 Introduction 1. I have been asked by Paul Bowe of Terraco on behalf of Jing Ying Pty Ltd (Submitter 12), the owner of the above property, to prepare a statement of expert evidence which addresses the heritage aspects relating to the proposed inclusion of part of the broader place in a Heritage Overlay. The inclusion of the Alistair Knox house in the Heritage Overlay is not opposed and therefore this evidence is in respect of the proposed heritage curtilage. 2. Amendment C234, proposes to include in the Schedule to the Heritage Overlay (HO915) the dwelling and a surrounding curtilage at 40 Harley Street, Strathdale. “Nanga Gnulle”, mud brick and reclaimed materials house. External paint controls are proposed and the place would be subject to an Incorporated Plan under Clause 43.01-2 i.e. Greater Bendigo Heritage Incorporated Plan – Permit Exemptions, August 2015. 3. The Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme Amendment C234 Explanatory Report states, inter alia, The main dwelling, constructed of mud brick and reclaimed materials is considered of heritage significance for its association with architect Alistair Knox, and use of recycled materials which provide a unique architectural style. The overlay is proposed to be applied to the dwelling and a 5 metre curtilage around it (approximately 650m2).
  • Community Infrastructure Plan Delivering on the Strategic Community Infrastructure Framework 2018

    Community Infrastructure Plan Delivering on the Strategic Community Infrastructure Framework 2018

    Community Infrastructure Plan Delivering on the Strategic Community Infrastructure Framework 2018 Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 1. Growth and change ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Context ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Housing growth ................................................................................................................................... 8 Business growth .................................................................................................................................. 9 Drivers of community needs ............................................................................................................... 9 Responding to needs......................................................................................................................... 10 2. Service catchments and neighbourhoods .................................................................................................... 11 3. Community needs .......................................................................................................................................
  • Yarra City Council

    Yarra City Council

    Draft Annual Budget 2021/22 Contents Page Message from the Mayor 3 Executive Summary 5 Budget Influences 9 Budget Reports 1. Link to the Council Plan 10 2. Services and service performance indicators 13 3. Financial statements 26 4. Notes to the financial statements 35 5. Financial Performance Indicators 54 Appendix A Schedule of fees and charges 56 Message from the Mayor G1 We are pleased to invite you to view our draft Budget for 2021/22. This document forms an integral part of Council’s overall strategic planning framework, setting out our priorities as we can build a fairer, more equal and climate-safe Yarra. We developed this year’s draft Budget following broad community consultation held between November 2020 and January 2021. During this time, we heard from more than 1300 people about their aspirations and priorities for the future. These insights are helping inform our 15-year Community Vision and the draft Budget 2021/22. Local Governments are complex organisations, and like all councils and all tiers of Government, Yarra’s financial position has been impacted significantly by the pandemic. Despite the challenging times we are in, I am incredibly proud to present a draft Budget that continues to address the current needs of our community, while also addressing what will be required in the future. As we recover from the health and economic challenges of COVID-19, Council is committed to investing in what makes our neighbourhoods such great places to live for everyone. This is a draft Budget that continues to build a solid foundation, ensuring Council has a strong and sustainable financial position in the years ahead.
  • Collingwood Town Hall Tours Sunday 13 July 2014

    Collingwood Town Hall Tours Sunday 13 July 2014

    Collingwood Historical Society Collingwood Town Hall Tours Sunday 13 July 2014 Figure 1: Rudd, Work in progress c1886, Yarra Libraries Collingwood Town Hall Tours Sunday 13 July 2014 Four tours were conducted at the Collingwood Town Hall Community Open Day on Sunday 13 July 2014 by Anne Holmes, Frances Ilyine and Karen Cummings of the Collingwood Historical Society for the City of Yarra. Stop 1: Introduction, Singleton Stained Glass & Significant People Introduction Let‟s think back to the 1880s: the phrase “Marvellous Melbourne” was coined to describe the city also known as the Metropolis of the Southern Hemisphere. The 1880s was a boom period with land speculation rife and the sounds of building to be heard everywhere. Collingwood might have been a working class and largely industrial suburb, but it was a significant contributor to Victoria‟s economy. It was one of the earliest municipalities, having been established in 1855, and by 1876 its annual income had reached a level high enough for it to merit proclamation as a city. So Collingwood too was participating in the boom, and it was fitting that the foundation stone of its lavish status symbol was laid right in the middle of the decade, in July 1885. This was not achieved without several years of argument about funding and location, and whether such a structure should be built at all. Council finally held a referendum to approve taking out a loan of £40,000, but only £12,000 of this loan would be needed for the town hall, despite its grandeur. This was because a significant portion would be paid for by the Victorian government who would operate a Post and Telegraph Office, and a police station and courthouse within the building.

  • City of Yarra Heritage Review Thematic History

    CITY OF YARRA HERITAGE REVIEW THEMATIC HISTORY VOLUME 1 Allom Lovell & Associates Conservation Architects 35 Little Bourke Street Melbourne 3000 July 1998 City ofYarra Heritage Review: Thematic History TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents i List of Figures iii Consultants vii Acknowledgements viii 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Present Location and Boundaries 1 1.2 Former Boundaries 1 1.3 Extent and Sources 1 1.4 Geology 5 1.5 Australian Heritage Commission: Historic Themes 5 2.0 The Suburban Extension of Melbourne 9 2.1 Settlement, Land Sales and Subdivision 9 2.2 A Street Layout Emerges 14 2.3 The Effect of the 1849-50 Melbourne Building Act 16 2.4 Clement Hodgkinson's 1853 Plan of Collingwood and East Melbourne 17 2.5 Clement Hodgkinson's 1857 (1855) Plan of Richmond 19 3.0 Mansions, Villas and Sustenance Housing: the Division between Rich and Poor 23 3.1 A Home to Call One's Own 23 3.2 Lodging People: Hotels and Boarding Houses 29 3.3 Slums and the Development of Public Housing 30 4.0 Developing Local Economies 35 4.1 Primary Industry 35 4.2 Secondary Industry 35 4.3 Retail: Warehouses and Large Scale Purveyors 46 4.4 Smaller Retailers: Strip Shopping 48 4.5 Financing the Suburbs 52 5.0 Local Council and Council Services 53 5.1 The Establishment of Municipal Boundaries 53 5.2 Civic Buildings 53 5.3 Local Policing and Defence 58 5.4 Crime and Punishment 59 5.5 Private and Public Transportation 60 5.6 Water and Sewerage 67 5.7 Gas and Electricity 71 5.8 Hospitals 73 5.9 Education 75 5.10 Libraries and Mechanics Institutes 81 Allom Lovell & Associates
  • Agenda of Council Meeting

    Agenda of Council Meeting

    Council Meeting Agenda – 30 March 2021 Agenda Council Meeting 7.00pm, Tuesday 30 March 2021 MS Teams Agenda Page 1 Council Meeting Agenda – 30 March 2021 Council Meetings Council Meetings are public forums where Councillors come together to meet as a Council and make decisions about important, strategic and other matters. The Mayor presides over all Council Meetings, and they are conducted in accordance with the City of Yarra Governance Rules 2020 and the Council Meetings Operations Policy. Council meetings are decision-making forums and only Councillors have a formal role. However, Council is committed to transparent governance and to ensuring that any person whose rights will be directly affected by a decision of Council is entitled to communicate their views and have their interests considered before the decision is made. There are two ways you can participate in the meeting. Public Question Time Yarra City Council welcomes questions from members of the community. Ideally, questions should be submitted to Council in writing by midday on the day of the meeting via the form available on our website. Submitting your question in advance helps us to provide a more comprehensive answer. Questions that have been submitted in advance will be answered first. Public question time is an opportunity to ask questions about issues for which you have not been able to gain a satisfactory response on a matter. As such, public question time is not: • a time to make statements or engage in debate with Councillors; • a forum to be used in relation to planning application matters which are required to be submitted and considered as part of the formal planning submission; • a forum for initially raising operational matters, which should be directed to the administration in the first instance.
  • 8 Chaucer Crescent, Canterbury

    8 Chaucer Crescent, Canterbury

    PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Boroondara Amendment C266 Heritage Overlay HO 700 Griffin Estate & Environs Precinct Subject site: 8 Chaucer Crescent Canterbury Expert Heritage Report Prepared for Max Findlay By Robyn Riddett Director Anthemion Consultancies POB18183 Collins Street East Melbourne 8003 Tel. +61 3 9495 6389 Email: [email protected] April 2018 8 Chaucer Crescent, Canterbury 1.0 Introduction 1. I have been asked by Max Findlay, the owner of the above property, to prepare a statement of expert evidence which addresses the heritage merits relating to the proposed grading of the above s as “Contributory” and its inclusion in a Heritage Overlay i.e. HO 700, Griffin Estate & Environs as a consequence of Amendment C266. Otherwise there is no objection to the application of the Heritage Overlay as proposed. 2. Amendment C264, gazetted on 8 February 2018, introduced interim Heritage Overlays to all affected properties in Canterbury, identified in the adopted Canterbury Heritage Gap Assessment and as recommended in Amendment C266. Amendment C264 has an expiry date of 30 November 2018. Amendment C266 seeks to introduce permanent Heritage Overlays as identified in the Canterbury Heritage Gap Study. 3. I understand that part of the proposed precinct i.e. Chaucer Crescent, was identified in the Draft Canterbury Heritage Gap Study and that a response to the preliminary consultation, Council recommended the “the merging of the Griffin Estate and Chaucer Crescent Precincts to create an expanded precinct known as the Griffin Estate & Environs Residential Precinct;” (Maddocks. Submission. P. 4.) 1.2 Reference Materials 4. I have read: Planning Panels Victoria. Guide to Expert Evidence.
  • Heritage Strategy 2019-2030 | City of Yarra 3

    Heritage Strategy 2019-2030 | City of Yarra 3

    Yarra City Council Heritage Strategy 2019 – 2030 Adopted by Council Tuesday 12 November, 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City of Yarra Councillors and Staff City of Yarra Heritage Advisory Committee City of Yarra Community Extent Heritage Pty. Ltd. Yarra City Council acknowledges the Wurundjeri Woi Wurrung people as the Traditional Owners and true sovereigns of the land now known as Yarra. We also acknowledge the significant contributions made by other Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to life in Yarra. We pay our respects to Elders from all nations and to their Elders past, present and future. Contents PART A – BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 Purpose ......................................................................................................................... 5 Scope ............................................................................................................................ 5 Process ......................................................................................................................... 6 Timeframe ..................................................................................................................... 6 Context ...................................................................................................................................... 7 The Historical
  • MELBOURNE: SETTLEMENT to GOLD 21,221 Words, 23 May 2012

    MELBOURNE: SETTLEMENT to GOLD 21,221 Words, 23 May 2012

    School of Design (TAFE) MELBOURNE: SETTLEMENT TO GOLD 21,221 words, 23 May 2012 Week 26 Terms Sod, wattle and daub, slab, adobe, cob, Pattern Book. Background Journey to Australia. Trauma of settlement in the wilderness. No building skills. Buildings first influenced by English rural vernacular. Historic development Settlement at Sorrento, 1803. Failed, due to a source of sufficent fresh water. Settlement at Corinella, Western Port Bay, 1826. Only some bricks survive. Melbourne was settled in 1835, illegally, by land-hungry pastoralists from Launceston. The District of Port Phillip, in the Colony of New South Wales was imposed on the settlers. Although not generally acknowledged as such, it was the only settlement in Australia unsanctioned by any government. Gold was discovered in 1851, at Warrandyte and Clunes: instant wealth. Gold towns Clunes. Building types: cottages, post office, banks, rail link (in 1862 to Ballarat and 1864 to Castlemaine), hotels, store, town hall, and schools particularly following the Education Act, 1873. Primitive buildings: material types Thatch, eg: haystacks and barns using reeds, near Hopetoun. 1 School of Design (TAFE) Sod, eg: at Parwan. This was the main material for early Melbourne, particularly for labourers houses. The was turf selected, mown, ploughed, and cut with a hatchet. Walls were 1,300 mm thick. Bark, eg: at the Seven Creeks Station, near Longford. Roofing and cladding. Poles frame and holding down. Axe cut, singed. Wood pegs fixing. They lasted 10-12 years. Two men could strip 40 - 60 trees/day. Wattle and Daub, eg: near Alberton, French Island and at Bacchus Marsh. More sophisticated, generally not in Melbourne.
  • Landmarks & Views Assessment

    Landmarks & Views Assessment

    LANDMARKS & VIEWS ASSESSMENT October 2019 CITY OF YARRA | REVIEW & DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF YARRA LANDMARKS POLICY Clock Tower of Dimmey’s, Swan Street 2 ETHOS URBAN CITY OF YARRA | REVIEW & DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF YARRA LANDMARKS POLICY 1 Clock Tower of Dimmey’s, Swan Street 140-160 Swan Street, Cremorne Description The Dimmey’s building is a double storey Romanesque style commercial building, constructed between 1907 and 1918. The main feature of the Dimmey’s building is the four level Clock Tower which is set centrally along the building’s street facade. At the top of the Tower is a dome, supported on decorative arches above the clock faces, that is surmounted by a large copper globe. The Clock Tower employs the federation free classical architectural style using contrasting materials with classical symmetrical detailing. A recent development involved the refurbishment and reinstatement of the building’s external heritage fabric and, inside this, the construction of two parking basements, supermarket and office spaces. This development also comprised of an elliptical, glass-clad 8 storey apartment tower, above the commercial floors. Setting The Dimmey’s building is located on the south side of Swan Street within the Activity Centre, which comprises an eclectic mix of predominantly Victorian or Edwardian era heritage buildings, as well as more recent buildings. Swan Street is a major metropolitan shopping strip, and a busy car and pedestrian thoroughfare with a tram line. Surrounding buildings are predominantly 2-3 storey commercial buildings. Topography is generally flat in this locality with a slight incline down towards the west.