DOCSLIB.ORG

Humanitarian Action Plan for the Conflict-Affected Provinces of Mindanao 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Humanitarian Action Plan for the Conflict-Affected Provinces of Mindanao 2011 Humanitarian Action Plan for the Conflict-Affected Provinces of Mindanao 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND AND SCOPE .......................................................................................................................... 1 TABLE I: SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS (GROUPED BY CLUSTER) .......................................................................... 3 TABLE II: SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS (GROUPED BY APPEALING ORGANIZATION)................................................. 3 2. CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. NEEDS ANALYSIS.......................................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 HUMANITARIAN CASELOAD .......................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 HUMANITARIAN AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS ........................................................................................... 17 3.3 HUMANITARIAN NEEDS OF IDPS AND RETURNEES ......................................................................................... 21 4. SCENARIOS.................................................................................................................................................... 23 5. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................ 25 6. HUMANITARIAN AGENCIES AND COORDINATION................................................................................... 28 6.1 COORDINATION .......................................................................................................................................... 28 6.2 HUMANITARIAN AGENCIES ........................................................................................................................... 31 7. CLUSTER RESPONSE PLANS...................................................................................................................... 33 7.1 CCCM...................................................................................................................................................... 33 7.2 EARLY RECOVERY...................................................................................................................................... 42 7.3 EDUCATION................................................................................................................................................ 47 7.4 FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE............................................................................................................ 54 7.5 HEALTH ..................................................................................................................................................... 59 7.6 NUTRITION................................................................................................................................................. 64 7.7 PROTECTION.............................................................................................................................................. 70 7.8 WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE ............................................................................................................. 85 ANNEXES ................................................................................................................................................................. 89 ANNEX A. LIST OF ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED................................................................................... 89 ANNEX B. LIST OF RESPONSE PLAN PROJECTS (GROUPED BY LOCATION AND CLUSTER)....................... 90 ANNEX C. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................... 106 Full project details can be viewed, downloaded and printed from http://fts.unocha.org. i ii Mindanao Humanitarian Action Plan 2011 1. Background and Scope The Humanitarian Action Plan for Conflict-Affected Provinces of Mindanao (HAP) covers humanitarian activities in six provinces of the southern Philippine island of Mindanao: Maguindanao, Lanao del Sur, Lanao del Norte, Sultan Kudarat, North Cotabato and South Cotabato.1 The provinces of Maguindanao and Lanao del Sur fall within the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM). The provinces of North Cotabato, South Cotabato and Sultan Kudarat fall within Region XII. The province of Lanao del Norte is within Region X. The ‘island provinces’ of Basilan and Sulu, although affected by conflict and with outstanding humanitarian needs, are not covered by the HAP at this time owing to a lack of information and access. It is intended, however, that these provinces be covered by the HAP in due course. The HAP covers a twelve-month period, from January 2011 until the end of December 2011. The total value of the projects in the HAP is US$ 34,527,526.2 The HAP was developed shortly after passage of the Republic Act No. 10121 (the “Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act” / DRRMA), which strengthens the Philippine disaster risk reduction and management system. The process of developing the HAP and the cluster plans therein fully recognises the provisions of this law. The HAP was developed through an intensive consultation process at the Mindanao level, which commenced with a one-day workshop in Cotabato City on 2 August 2010. The HAP workshop, which established the basic scope, framework and approach for the HAP, benefitted from the active participation of ARMM and Region XII Government representatives, all members of the international humanitarian community active in Mindanao and key local non-government organizations (NGOs). The main component of the HAP was developed through the clusters, with each cluster chaired by the respective government line ministry, and subsequently endorsed by both the Mindanao Humanitarian Team (MHT) in Cotabato City and the Humanitarian Country Team (HCT) in Manila before being shared with the regional governments for their final comments.3 A list of government departments, international organisations, UN agencies and international and national NGOs which participated in the HAP process is included in Annex A. From humanitarian response to early recovery With the initial conflict-related displacement having taken place more than two years ago, and the ceasefire of July 2009 continuing to hold4, the vast majority of the caseload of internally displaced people (IDPs) targeted in this HAP have returned to their places of origin. Accordingly, the emphasis of programming by humanitarian actors (as well as governments) is increasingly on early recovery interventions, both as projects in their own right and as a fundamentally important cross-cutting theme in ongoing humanitarian programmes. In terms of the generally recognised model of transition from humanitarian relief through early recovery to development (as illustrated in the diagram below), the target caseload is considered to be in the early recovery phase, requiring decreasing humanitarian intervention specifically related to needs generated by conflict/displacement and increasing humanitarian support through early recovery initiatives. This critical shift in focus has been reflected throughout the HAP, with early recovery mainstreamed into each of the cluster response plans (rather than overburdening the “Early Recovery Cluster Response Plan”). The HAP recognises the fundamental importance of ensuring that returns are sustainable and that failure to adequately support early recovery would risk prolonging the crisis. It is important to note in this context that in the United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) for 2012-2018, which is being developed in close consultation with the Government and key stakeholders, Mindanao – in particular the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao – has been identified as the region least likely to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and, accordingly, as a priority geographic focus of the UNDAF (meaning that the HAP is in line with longer-term UN and government development objectives). Moreover, it is important to note the pattern of the past few decades, which has been that of peace negotiations punctuated by widespread fighting that results in relatively few deaths but displaces hundreds of thousands – i.e. cycles of displacement/return/displacement. 1 About 33% of the total budget is earmarked for projects in Maguindanao (see also the pie charts in Annex B). 2 All dollar signs in this document denote United States dollars. 3 These consultations took place from 30 November to 3 December 2010 in General Santos City (OCD Region XII), Koronadal (DSWD Region XII), Cagayan de Oro (OCD and DSWD Region X) and Cotabato City (ARMM Government). 4 The International Monitoring Team has recorded only three armed skirmishes between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) from January to October 2010, a significant drop from 110 for the same period in 2009 (a total of 116 armed skirmishes were recorded from January to December 2009, and 222 from March to December 2008). 1 Mindanao Humanitarian Action Plan 2011 Source: Cluster Working Group on Early Recovery (2008), Guidance note on Early Recovery The diagram illustrates the transition from the relief to early recovery and development phases and the main mechanisms the international community
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quarterly Report
    MARAWI RESPONSE PROJECT (MRP) Quarterly Report FY 2020 1st Quarter – October 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 Submission Date: January 31, 2020 Cooperative Agreement Number: 72049218CA00007 Activity Start Date and End Date: August 29, 2018 – August 28, 2021 Submitted by: Plan International USA, Inc. This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development Philippine Mission (USAID/Philippines). 1 PROJECT PROFILE Program: USAID/PHILIPPINES MARAWI RESPONSE PROJECT (MRP) Activity Start Date and End August 29, 2018 – August 28, 2021 Date: Name of Prime Plan USA International Inc. Implementing Partner: Cooperative Agreement 72049218CA00007 Number: Names of Subcontractors/ Ecosystems Work for Essential Benefits (ECOWEB) and Sub-awardees: Maranao People Development Center, Inc. (MARADECA) Major Counterpart Organizations Geographic Coverage Lanao del Sur, Marawi City, Lanao del Norte and Iligan City (cities and or countries) Reporting Period: October 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 2 CONTENTS PROJECT PROFILE .......................................................................................................... 2 CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... 3 ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 4 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 5 2. PROJECT OVERVIEW .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Marawi Lessons from Detained Extremists in the Philippines
    POST-MARAWI LESSONS FROM DETAINED EXTREMISTS IN THE PHILIPPINES 27 NOVEMBER 2017 IPAC Report No. 41 CONTENTS I. Introduction ...............................................................................................1 II. The Davao Suspects ....................................................................................2 III. Radicalisation and Recruitment ...............................................................2 A. Fakhrudin Dilangalen’s Recruits ........................................................3 B. T.J. Macabalang’s Recruits..................................................................3 C. What to Watch For Now.....................................................................4 IV. Membership and Training ..... .................................................................5 A. AKP Training in Butril, Palimbang, Sultan Kudarat province .....6 B. Training shifts to Butig, Lanao del Sur, December 2015 ................7 V. Financing .....................................................................................................8 VI. The Dire State of the Criminal Justice System ........................................9 VII. Conclusions ...............................................................................................10 Post-Marawi Lessons from Detained Extremists in the Philippines ©2017 IPAC 1 I. INTRODUCTION Information from the suspects in the September 2016 Davao bombing sheds important light on the radicalization and recruitment processes that led a pro-ISIS coalition to take over the
    [Show full text]
  • Idps Begin Return to Marawi
    Humanitarian Bulletin Philippines Issue 11 | December 2017 - January 2018 In this issue IDPs return to Marawi P.1 HIGHLIGHTS NGOs displaced by Marawi conflict reopen P.3 • Thousands of IDPs are gradually returning to some Gender in humanitarian action training P.5 areas of Marawi City and surrounding municipalities. Credit: IOM/E. Lumanta Humanitarian needs of the affected population remain and will continue well into the Hope for lasting peace and safety: IDPs begin new year. return to Marawi • Non-governmental organizations who were The gunfire has fallen silent in Marawi City since the military declared the end of the displaced by the Marawi conflict in October. The hope of returning home has rekindled for over 350,000 internally conflict reopen their field displaced persons who sought refuge with host families and in evacuation centres offices and continue for the last five months. Thousands of people returning to their barangays are finding operations. out what is left of their properties and homes. The Government of the Philippines has started the phased return of Marawi City residents whose homes had minimum to • Marawi humanitarian actors participate in a Gender in medium damage. As of 10 December, the Government has facilitated the return of over Humanitarian Action training 26,000 families following clearing operations by the military for unexploded ordnance in Iligan City. and debris. The UN migration agency, IOM is assisting authorities with facilitating the safe and dignified return of the displaced to their places of origin. People from about one third of barangays affected by heavy fighting and destructions during the conflict may not be able to return soon.
    [Show full text]
  • Doj Reso Maute Doctor
    --I' ·,- Republika ng Pilipinas KAGAWARAN NG KATARUNGAN Department of Justice Manila GABRIEL TOMATAO PERMITIS, Complainant, • versus- NPS RXIV-04-INV-16H-00179 For: Kidnapping OMINTA ROMATO MAUTE, et al., Respondents. x---------------------------------------------- ALFREDO SARSALEJO CANO-OS, Complainant, • versus- NPS RXIV-04-INV-16H-00180 For: Kidnapping ABDULAH ROMATO MAUTE, et al., Respondents. x------------------------------ ---- ------------ ESPERANZA PERMITIS JANUBAS, Complainant. - versus- NPS RXIV-04-INV-16H-00181 For: Murder (2 counts) ABDULAH ROMATO MAUTE, et al., Respondents. x---------------------------------------------- ADONIS ANTIPISTO MENDEZ, Complainant, - versus- NPS RXIV-04-INV-16H-00182 For: Kidnapping 1 Scanned by CamScanner ' I ... ABDULAH ROMATO MAUTE, et al., Respondents. x---------------------------------------------- JULITO PERMITIS JANUBAS, Complainant, - vensus- NPS RXIV-04-INV-16H-00183 For: Kidnapping ABDULAH ROMA TO MAUTE, et al., Respondents. x---------------------------------------------- JOINT RESOLUTION This resolves jointly the supplemental complaints filed by Tomatao Pennitis, Alfredo Sarsalejo Cano-os, Esperanza ""'"'"rmn• Janubas, Adonis Antipisto Mendez and Julito Permitis 00 against the second (2 ) set of respondents, namely, Abu Akmad, Mimbantas @ Zakaria, Alihasan Panolong @ Abu Amar, F Dilangalin @ Abu Said, Osoph Hadji Nasif, Hafts Maute, An~an Alawiya Dimapi, Abang Samsoden Ragaolan, Abdul Malik, Khalil @ Omar Khalil@ Umair Pacora Khalil, Jamil B. Amir, Hata Lantud, Abu Apghan, Eyemen Alonto,
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines: Marawi Armed-Conflict 3W (As of 18 April 2018)
    Philippines: Marawi Armed-Conflict 3W (as of 18 April 2018) CITY OF Misamis Number of Activities by Status, Cluster & Number of Agencies EL SALVADOR Oriental 138 7,082 ALUBIJID Agencies Activities INITAO Number of CAGAYAN DE CLUSTER Ongoing Planned Completed OPOL ORO CITY (Capital) organizations NAAWAN Number of activities by Municipality/City 1-10 11-50 51-100 101-500 501-1,256 P Cash 12 27 69 10 CCCM 0 0 ILIGAN CITY 571 3 Misamis LINAMON Occidental BACOLOD Coord. 1 0 14 3 KAUSWAGAN TAGOLOAN MATUNGAO MAIGO BALOI POONA KOLAMBUGAN PANTAR TAGOLOAN II Bukidnon PIAGAPO Educ. 32 32 236 11 KAPAI Lanao del Norte PANTAO SAGUIARAN TANGCAL RAGAT MUNAI MARAWI MAGSAYSAY DITSAAN- CITY BUBONG PIAGAPO RAMAIN TUBOD FSAL 23 27 571 53 MARANTAO LALA BUADIPOSO- BAROY BUNTONG MADALUM BALINDONG SALVADOR MULONDO MAGUING TUGAYA TARAKA Health 79 20 537 KAPATAGAN 30 MADAMBA BACOLOD- Lanao TAMPARAN KALAWI SAPAD Lake POONA BAYABAO GANASSI PUALAS BINIDAYAN LUMBACA- Logistics 0 0 3 1 NUNUNGAN MASIU LUMBA-BAYABAO SULTAN NAGA DIMAPORO BAYANG UNAYAN PAGAYAWAN LUMBAYANAGUE BUMBARAN TUBARAN Multi- CALANOGAS LUMBATAN cluster 7 1 146 32 SULTAN PICONG (SULTAN GUMANDER) BUTIG DUMALONDONG WAO MAROGONG Non-Food Items 1 0 221 MALABANG 36 BALABAGAN Nutrition 82 209 519 15 KAPATAGAN Protection 61 37 1,538 37 Maguindanao Shelter 4 4 99 North Cotabato 7 WASH 177 45 1,510 32 COTABATO CITY TOTAL 640 402 6,034 The boundaries, names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations Creation date: 18 April 2018 Sources: PSA
    [Show full text]
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses
    Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses www.rsis.edu.sg ISSN 2382-6444 | Volume 10, Issue 9 | September 2018 A JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND TERRORISM RESEARCH (CTR) The Lamitan Bombing and Terrorist Threat in the Philippines Rommel C. Banlaoi Crime-Terror Nexus in Southeast Asia Bilveer Singh India and the Crime-Terrorism Nexus Ramesh Balakrishnan Crime -Terror Nexus in Pakistan Farhan Zahid Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses Volume 9, Issue 4 | April 2017 1 Building a Global Network for Security Editorial Note Terrorist Threat in the Philippines and the Crime-Terror Nexus In light of the recent Lamitan bombing in the detailing the Siege of Marawi. The Lamitan Southern Philippines in July 2018, this issue bombing symbolises the continued ideological highlights the changing terrorist threat in the and physical threat of IS to the Philippines, Philippines. This issue then focuses, on the despite the group’s physical defeat in Marawi crime-terror nexus as a key factor facilitating in 2017. The author contends that the counter- and promoting financial sources for terrorist terrorism bodies can defeat IS only through groups, while observing case studies in accepting the group’s presence and hold in the Southeast Asia (Philippines) and South Asia southern region of the country. (India and Pakistan). The symbiotic Wrelationship and cooperation between terrorist Bilveer Singh broadly observes the nature groups and criminal organisations is critical to of the crime-terror nexus in Southeast Asia, the existence and functioning of the former, and analyses the Abu Sayyaf Group’s (ASG) despite different ideological goals and sources of finance in the Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • Osro/Phi/803/Cfs
    Project Highlights PHILIPPINES Marawi recovery project: Support for enhancing agriculture-based livelihoods of internally displaced farmers affected by the Marawi conflict Project code: OSRO/PHI/803/CFS Resource Partner: Community and Family Services International Contribution: USD 715 941 Implementation: 01/05/2018–30/09/2019 Target areas: Piagapo, Marantao and Ditsaan-Ramain municipalities, Lanao Del Sur Province Xiangjun Yao, FAO Representative ad interim, the Philippines. [email protected] Contact Dominique Burgeon, Director, Emergency and Resilience Division. [email protected] Objective: To provide livelihood support and training to internally displaced people and other affected populations from the Marawi Siege, especially the most vulnerable and those with special needs, to foster their sustainable economic recovery. Key partners: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Agrarian Reform, Provincial Agriculture Office- Lanao del Sur; Task Force Bangon Marawi; Local Government Units of Piagapo, Marantao and Ditsaan-Ramain; Philippine Fiber Industry Development Authority; Department of Trade and Industry Region 10. Beneficiaries reached: 2 500 households (16 250 people). Activities Distributed 232 800 abaca suckers, 3 244 500 sakurab (white scallion) bulblets, implemented: 103 800 sweet potato cuttings, 11 724 bags of organic fertilizer (50 kg/bag), 37 350 grams hot chili seeds, 3 448 plastic vegetable crates, 2 327 bags of complete fertilizer (50 kg/bag), 1 724 garden rakes and 1 552 tuxying knives to 2 500 households. Trained 719 people (52 percent women) on a variety of production and processing techniques to add value to their agricultural enterprises, and supported 105 farmers and extension workers with on-site technical advice on agricultural production.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Socio Economic Profile of the Study Area
    CHAPTER 3 SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE STUDY AREA 3.1 SOCIAL CONDITIONS 3.1.1 Demographic Trend 1) Population Trends by Region Philippine population has been continuously increasing from 48.1million in 1980, 76.3 million in 2000 to 88.5million in 2007 with 2.15% of annual growth rate (2000-2007). Population of both Mindanao and ARMM also showed higher increases than national trend since 2000, from 18.1 in 2000 to 21.6 million in 2007 (AAGR: 2.52%), and 2.9 in 2000 to 4.1million in 2007 (AAGR: 5.27%), respectively. Population share of Mindanao to Philippines and of ARMM to Mindanao significantly increased from 23.8% to 24.4% and 15.9% to 24.4%, respectively. 100,000,000 90,000,000 Philippines Mindanao 80,000,000 ARMM 70,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 0 1980 1990 1995 2000 2007 Year Source: NSO, 2008 FIGURE 3.1.1-1 POPULATION TRENDS OF PHILIPPINES, MINDANAO AND ARMM Population trends of Mindanao by region are illustrated in Figure 3.1.1-2 and the growth in ARMM is significantly high in comparison with other regions since 1995, especially from 2000 to 2007. 3 - 1 4,500,000 IX 4,000,000 X XI 3,500,000 XII XIII ARMM 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 1980 1990 1995 2000 2007 year Source NSO, 2008 FIGURE 3.1.1-2 POPULATION TRENDS BY REGION IN MINDANAO As a result, the population composition within Mindanao indicates some different features from previous decade that ARMM occupies a certain amount of share (20%), almost same as Region XI in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Rice Suitability Map Province of Lanao Del
    123°50' 124°0' 124°10' 124°20' 124°30' 124°40' 124°50' 8°20' 8°20' Province of Misamis Oriental R E P U B L I C O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S D E P A R T M E N T O F A G R I C U LT U R E BUREAU OF SOIL S AND WATER M ANAGEMENT I l i g a n B a y Elliptical Road Cor. Visayas Ave., Diliman, Quezon City RICE SUITABILITY MAP ( Key Rice Areas ) PROVINCE OF LANAO DEL SUR ° SCALE 1:135,000 8°10' 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8°10' Province of Lanao del Norte Kilometers Projection : Transverse Mercator Datum : Luzon 1911 LEGEND DISCLAIMER : All political boundaries are not authoritative SUITABILITY LIMITING FACTORS AREA DESCRIPTION RATING Moderate Marginal Severe ha % S1 Highly Suitable - - - 544 2.14 S2d d - - 3,710 14.60 S2d S2df S2df d,f - - 10,445 41.10 S2df S2dxf Kapai S2d S2dx d,x - - 897 3.53 S2df S2d S2dxf Moderately Suitable d,x,f - - 1,905 7.50 S2f f - - 1,058 4.16 S2d S2x x - - 1,072 4.22 S2df S2xf x,f - - 3,837 15.10 Saguiaran S3x d x - 467 1.84 Marginally Suitable S2df S3x d,f x - 1,478 5.81 TOTAL. 25,414 100.00 Province of Bukidnon S2df MARAWI S2dx 8°0' Note: Piagapo Highly Suitable (S1) - with none to slight limitations for any given use.
    [Show full text]
  • Marawi Rebuilding from Ashes to a City of Faith, Hope and Peace
    MARAWI REBUILDING FROM ASHES TO A CITY OF FAITH, HOPE AND PEACE MARAWI REBUILDING FROM ASHES TO A CITY OF FAITH, HOPE AND PEACE 1 Marawi: Rebuilding from Ashes to a City of Faith, Hope, and Peace Listening Methodology Development: Soth Plai Ngarm Listening Project Implementation (Training, Processing) Team: Betchak Padilla Mary Schletzbaum Writer/Editor: Tengku Shahpur Cover photo & Inside Photos: Acram Latiph, Field researchers (Listeners) Lay-out: Boonruang Song-Ngam Copy Editor: Lakshmi Jacota Publisher: Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies Funding: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) ISBN: 2 Acknowledgements The Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies (CPCS) is grateful to Dansalan College, Mindanao State University and Institute Bangsamoro Studies who have provided invaluable assistance throughout the project. We could not have done this without you. We are especially grateful to all the individuals who volunteered to be listeners. We appreciate the time, energy, enthusiasm and empathy that you demonstrated throughout the process, and your willingness to travel to remote areas. We are especially grateful for the courage you displayed by revisiting the areas where the siege took place and speaking to survivors. Thank you. We would also like to express our heartfelt gratitude to the survivors of the siege who were willing to share their experiences, knowledge and hopes for the future. Thank you for your candor, bravery, and strength and for entrusting us with your voices. Lastly, we would like to thank the Department of Foreign
    [Show full text]
  • Counter-Insurgency Vs. Counter-Terrorism in Mindanao
    THE PHILIPPINES: COUNTER-INSURGENCY VS. COUNTER-TERRORISM IN MINDANAO Asia Report N°152 – 14 May 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. ISLANDS, FACTIONS AND ALLIANCES ................................................................ 3 III. AHJAG: A MECHANISM THAT WORKED .......................................................... 10 IV. BALIKATAN AND OPLAN ULTIMATUM............................................................. 12 A. EARLY SUCCESSES..............................................................................................................12 B. BREAKDOWN ......................................................................................................................14 C. THE APRIL WAR .................................................................................................................15 V. COLLUSION AND COOPERATION ....................................................................... 16 A. THE AL-BARKA INCIDENT: JUNE 2007................................................................................17 B. THE IPIL INCIDENT: FEBRUARY 2008 ..................................................................................18 C. THE MANY DEATHS OF DULMATIN......................................................................................18 D. THE GEOGRAPHICAL REACH OF TERRORISM IN MINDANAO ................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Solicitation Document
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) MEDIA PRODUCTION FIRM FOR THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE EMPOWER PH AND EMPOWER BARMM INITIATIVES DATE: April 20, 2021 REFERENCE: RFQ-040-PHL-2021 Dear Sir / Madam: We kindly request you to submit your Proposal for the Services of a Media Production Firm for the Documentation of UNDP’s project – EMPOWER PH and EMPOWER BARMM Initiatives. Please be guided by the form attached hereto as Annex 2, in preparing your Proposal. Proposals may be submitted on or before Thursday, April 29, 2021, COB Manila Philippines, via email to the address below: UNDP Philippines Procurement Unit Email: [email protected] Your Proposal must be expressed in the English, and valid for a minimum period of 90 days. In the course of preparing your Proposal, it shall remain your responsibility to ensure that it reaches the address above on or before the deadline. Proposals that are received by UNDP after the deadline indicated above, for whatever reason, shall not be considered for evaluation. If you are submitting your Proposal by email, kindly ensure that they are signed and in the .pdf format, and free from any virus or corrupted files. Services proposed shall be reviewed and evaluated based on completeness and compliance of the Proposal and responsiveness with the requirements of the RFP and all other annexes providing details of UNDP requirements. The Proposal that complies with all of the requirements, meets all the evaluation criteria and offers the best value for money shall be selected and awarded the contract. Any offer that does not meet the requirements shall be rejected.
    [Show full text]