Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Coordinated Long-Term Operation of the Central Valley Project and the State Water P

OREGON

r i n i ty River

a c r a er m iv

e R n r

t e

o h

e F

ican River R er iv m e A r

r e N v E i V R A D s A u S a

a l tanis n S

Jo a q u in

R i v er

r ve Ri er n P K a c if ic O ce a n

r e v

i R

o Z I

d R

a A

l o $ C 020 40 80 Miles

O LEGEND MEXIC DWR Groundwater Basins & Subbasins

Figure 7.1 California Groundwater Basins and Subbasins Defined in DWR Bulletin 118 OREGON

r i n i ty River

a c r a r m e iv

e R n t r

e F

ican River R er iv m e A r

r Eastern e v i N San R E VA s D S Joaquin u A a isl a n Stan Jo a q u in R iv e r Chowchilla Madera Kings

Kaweah Tulare Lake Tule

r ve Kern County Ri r n Ke

P a c Cuyama if ic Valley O c e Las Posas a n Valley r e v

Oxnard i R Pleasant A

Valley O o Z I

d R

a A

l $ o

020 40 80 Miles C

LEGEND

O 1980 DWR Critically Overdrafted Groundwater Basins & Subbasins MEXIC Other DWR Groundwater Basins & Subbasins

Figure 7.2 Overdrafted Groundwater Basins Defined in DWR Bulletin 118 Pacific Ocean

Lower Klamath River Valley

K la m a th R iv er

r iv e R t h ma Kla

Hoopa Valley

Trin ity $ Riv er 03 6 12 Miles

LEGEND

Trinity River Region DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins

Other DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins

County Boundaries

Figure 7.3 North Coast Groundwater Basins Defined in DWR Bulletin 118 Enterprise

Millville Anderson

South Battle Creek Rosewood Bend Bowman Antelope Red Bluff Dye Creek

Los Molinos

Corning Vina

West Butte

a m

North Yuba East Butte R 1 iv e

r e

Colusa v i

Sutter R

e South Yuba

e F

Capay Valley North American

River Yolo n a c $ A meri South 05 10 20 Miles American Solano LEGEND

Redding Area DWR Groundwater Subbasins

Sacramento Valley Region DWR Groundwater Subbasins

Other DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins

County Boundaries

Figure 7.4 Sacramento Valley Groundwater Basin Defined in DWR Bulletin 118 er Riv an ic r Am e

S a c r a South American m

e n

t o

e r

Solano Cosumnes

Suisun-Fairfield Valley

Eastern San Joaquin

Tracy

S a n

J o

q u

i River n laus nis R Sta iv e r $ 02.5 5 10 Miles

LEGEND Delta Area DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins Other DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins County Boundaries

Figure 7.5 Groundwater Subbasins in the Delta Area Defined in DWR Bulletin 118 Cosumnes

Eastern San Joaquin

Tracy er Riv islaus Stan

Modesto

S a n Turlock J o aq u in R i ve

Merced

Delta-Mendota Chowchilla

Madera $ 0 5 10 20 Miles

LEGEND

San Joaquin Valley DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins

Other DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins

County Boundaries

Figure 7.6 San Joaquin Valley Region Groundwater Basin Defined in DWR Bulletin 118

DWR, 2012. http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/bulletin118/gwbasin_maps_descriptions.c Kings

Westside

Kaweah

Tulare Lake

Pleasant Valley Tule

Kern County $ 05 10 20 Miles

P a LEGENDc if ic O Tulare Lake Area DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins ce a Othern DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins

County Boundaries

Figure 7.7 Tulare Lake Area Groundwater Basin Defined in DWR Bulletin 118 Arroyo Del Pittsburg Plain Hambre Valley Clayton Valley

Ygnacio Valley

San Ramon Valley us River nisla East Bay Plain Sta

Livermore Valley Castro Valley S an J o Niles Cone a q u in R iv er Santa Clara

Llagas P a c i fic O Hollister Area c e a n Bolsa Area San Juan $ Bautista Area 05 10 20 Miles

LEGEND

San Francisco Bay Area DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins

Other DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins

County Boundaries

Figure 7.8 San Francisco Bay Area Groundwater Basins Defined in DWR Bulletin 118 Morro Valley

Chorro Valley

Los Osos Valley

San Luis Obispo Valley

Santa Maria River Valley

San Antonio Creek Valley

P a c if ic Santa Ynez River Valley O ce a n

Goleta Foothill Santa Barbara $ Montecito 05 10 20 Miles Carpinteria

LEGEND Central Coast Region DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins Other DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins County Boundaries

Figure 7.9 Central Coast Region Groundwater Basins defined in DWR Bulletin 118 Simi Valley

Acton Valley Fillmore Piru

Santa Paula Santa Clara River Valley East

Mound Raymond

Las Posas San Fernando Valley Valley

Oxnard San Gabriel Valley

Pleasant Valley

Arroyo Santa Central Rosa Valley P Tierre Rejada a c Conejo Valley if ic Hidden Valley O Malibu Valley c e a Thousand Oaks Area n Santa Monica Russell Valley Hollywood

West Coast $ Coastal Plain of Orange County 05 10 20 Miles

San Juan Valley LEGEND Coastal Southern California Area DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins Other DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins County Boundaries

Figure 7.10 Coastal Southern California Area Groundwater Basins Defined in DWR Bulletin 118 San Mateo Valley

San Onofre Valley

Santa Margarita Valley

Escondido Valley San Luis Rey Valley Pamo Valley

San Marcos Valley

Batiquitos Lagoon Valley Santa Maria Valley San San Elijo Valley Pasqual Valley Poway Valley

San Dieguito Valley

San Diego River Valley Mission Valley

El Cajon

Sweetwater Valley

Otay Valley $ Tijuana 03.5 7 14 Miles

LEGEND South Southern California Area DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins Other DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins County Boundaries

Figure 7.11 San Diego Area Groundwater Basins Defined in DWR Bulletin 118 Cajon

Cucamonga Rialto-Colton Bunker Hill Yucaipa San Timoteo San Gorgonio Pass

Chino Mission Creek

Desert Hot Springs

San Jacinto

P a c if ic Indio O ce a Temescal n Riverside-Arlington

Elsinore

$ Temecula Valley 05 10 20 Miles

LEGEND Southern California Region DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins Other DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins County Boundaries

Figure 7.12 Southern California Region Groundwater Basins Defined in DWR Bulletin 118 Salt Wells Valley

Searles Valley Indian Wells Valley

Pilot Knob Valley Grass Valley

Langford Well Lake Superior Valley Cuddeback Valley Cronise Valley

Fremont Valley Coyote Lake Valley

Harper Valley Caves Canyon Valley Lower Mojave Kane Wash Area River Valley Iron Ridge Area Middle Mojave River Valley Antelope Valley Bessemer Valley Upper Johnson Valley

Upper Mojave Deadman Lake River Valley Surprise Spring El Mirage Valley Lucerne Valley Twentynine Palms Valley Soggy Lake $ Means Valley 05 10 20 Miles Ames Valley Joshua Tree Copper Mountain Valley Lost Horse Valley Morongo Valley LEGEND Warren Valley Antelope and Mojave Valley DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins Other DWR Groundwater Basins and Subbasins County Boundaries

Figure 7.13 Antelope Valley and Mojave Valley Groundwater Basins Defined in DWR Bulletin 118 T LEGEND ri n ! (! ity ( CITY EUREKA River 1 CVHM WATER BALANCE SUBREGION (! REDDING 1

r 2 a m

t o (! R CHICO

e r

5 3

4 Feather River e 7 Am rican River

(! SACRAMENTO 6

8 9 r e v i s R au nis l (! SAN FRANCISCO Sta 11 (! MODESTO

S a n J 12 o a q u P in a R 13 c iv if er ic O c 10 e (! FRESNO a 16 n 17 14 15 18

!EUREKA

20 19 Kern River ! SACRAMENTO NEVADA P (! a BAKERSFIELD c if ic O 21 c e a n CVHM ACTIVE DOMAIN CALIFORNIA

! SAN DIEGO Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, USGS, VICINITY MAP $ 0 60 120 Miles NOAA Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA,USGS (2009) $ YOSEMITEZ:\MODELING\3WORKSPACE\TOOLKIT_DEVELOPMENT\CVHM\CVHM_2010\GIS\MAPFILES\APPENDIX_FIGURES\FIG_7.14_MODEL_WBS.MXD 5/28/2015

Figure 7.14 Groundwater Model Domain and Water Balance Subregions in the Central Valley LEGEND T r !( in CITY it !( EUREKA y R iver 1 CVHM WATER BALANCE SUBREGION (WBS) GROUNDWATER-LEVEL CHANGE !( REDDING DUE TO PROJECT (FEET) 1 -200 to -100 -100 to -50 -50 to -25

c -25 to -10

r a 2 m -10 to -2 e n -2 to 2 t o !( R CHICO 2 to 10

i v

e 10 to 25 r 5 25 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 200 3 NOTES: 4

Feather River RESULTS ARE FOR MODEL LAYER 6. 7 American Riv er MODEL RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 2 ARE THE SAME AS FOR THE NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE. !( 6 SACRAMENTO ALTERNATIVES ARE SIMULATED WITH PROJECTED CLIMATE CHANGE AT YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS. 8

r e iv R 9 s lau nis !( SAN FRANCISCO Sta 11 !( MODESTO 12 S a n J o a q u P in a R 13 c iv if 10 er ic O c FRESNO e !( 16 a n 14 17

15 18

!EUREKA

20 19 Kern River !SACRAMENTO NEVADA P !( a BAKERSFIELD c if ic 21 O c e a n

CVHM ACTIVE DOMAIN CALIFORNIA

! SAN DIEGO Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, USGS, VICINITY MAP $ 0 60 120 Miles NOAA Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA,USGS (2009) $ YOSEMITE\\YOSEMITE\PROJ\USBUREAUOFRECLAMATIO\427225\MODELING\3WORKSPACE\CVHM_GIS\FIGURES\MXD\UPDATES_20151019\FIG_7.15_ALT2_SBC_W.MXD 10/30/2015

Figure 7.15 Forecast Groundwater-Level Changes for Alternative 2 and No Action Alternative Compared to Second Basis of Comparison for Average July in a Future Wet Year LEGEND T r !( in CITY it !( EUREKA y R iver 1 CVHM WATER BALANCE SUBREGION (WBS) GROUNDWATER-LEVEL CHANGE !( REDDING DUE TO PROJECT (FEET) 1 -200 to -100 -100 to -50 -50 to -25

c -25 to -10

r a 2 m -10 to -2 e n -2 to 2 t o !( R CHICO 2 to 10

i v

e 10 to 25 r 5 25 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 200 3 NOTES: 4

r e iv R 9 s lau nis !( SAN FRANCISCO Sta 11 !( MODESTO 12 S a n J o a q u P in a R 13 c iv if 10 er ic O c FRESNO e !( 16 a n 14 17

15 18

!EUREKA

20 19 Kern River !SACRAMENTO NEVADA P !( a BAKERSFIELD c if ic 21 O c e a n

CVHM ACTIVE DOMAIN CALIFORNIA

Figure 7.16 Forecast Groundwater-Level Changes for Alternative 2 and No Action Alternative Compared to Second Basis of Comparison for Average July in a Future Above-Normal Year LEGEND T r !( in CITY it !( EUREKA y R iver 1 CVHM WATER BALANCE SUBREGION (WBS) GROUNDWATER-LEVEL CHANGE !( REDDING DUE TO PROJECT (FEET) 1 -200 to -100 -100 to -50 -50 to -25

c -25 to -10

r a 2 m -10 to -2 e n -2 to 2 t o !( R CHICO 2 to 10

i v

e 10 to 25 r 5 25 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 200 3 NOTES: 4

r e iv R 9 s lau nis !( SAN FRANCISCO Sta 11 !( MODESTO 12 S a n J o a q u P in a R 13 c iv if 10 er ic O c FRESNO e !( 16 a n 14 17

15 18

!EUREKA

20 19 Kern River !SACRAMENTO NEVADA P !( a BAKERSFIELD c if ic 21 O c e a n

CVHM ACTIVE DOMAIN CALIFORNIA

Figure 7.17 Forecast Groundwater-Level Changes for Alternative 2 and No Action Alternative Compared to Second Basis of Comparison for Average July in a Future Below-Normal Year LEGEND T r !( in CITY it !( EUREKA y R iver 1 CVHM WATER BALANCE SUBREGION (WBS) GROUNDWATER-LEVEL CHANGE !( REDDING DUE TO PROJECT (FEET) 1 -200 to -100 -100 to -50 -50 to -25

c -25 to -10

r a 2 m -10 to -2 e n -2 to 2 t o !( R CHICO 2 to 10

i v

e 10 to 25 r 5 25 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 200 3 NOTES: 4

r e iv R 9 s lau nis !( SAN FRANCISCO Sta 11 !( MODESTO 12 S a n J o a q u P in a R 13 c iv if 10 er ic O c FRESNO e !( 16 a n 14 17

15 18

!EUREKA

20 19 Kern River !SACRAMENTO NEVADA P !( a BAKERSFIELD c if ic 21 O c e a n

CVHM ACTIVE DOMAIN CALIFORNIA

Figure 7.18 Forecast Groundwater-Level Changes for Alternative 2 and No Action Alternative Compared to Second Basis of Comparison for Average July in a Future Dry Year NOAA USGS, Esri, Sources: Credits: Layer Service

Compared to Second Basis of Comparison for Average July in a Future Critically-Dry Year Critically-Dry Future a in July Average for Comparison of Basis Second to Compared Alternative Action No and 2 Alternative for Changes Groundwater-Level Forecast 7.19 Figure YOSEMITE \\YOSEMITE\PROJ\USBUREAUOFRECLAMATIO\427225\MODELING\3WORKSPACE\CVHM_GIS\FIGURES\MXD\UPDATES_20151019\FIG_7.19_ALT2_SBC_CD.MXD 10/30/2015 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA,USGS (2009) NOAA,USGS USGS, Esri, Sources: Credits: Layer Service VICINITY MAP VICINITY

CVHM ACTIVE ACTIVE CVHM

P !

c EUREKA

i P

c EUREKA

DOMAIN c

a c

f i c

! O

SACRAMENTO

T e

i v

r CALIFORNIA NEVADA ! SAN DIEGO SAN !( SAN FRANCISCO

r REDDING

e n

3 R i r v e $ 4 6 !( CHICO 5 Feather River 9 MODESTO !( 7 SACRAMENTO

a n

o S

a !(

q 12 t

u a i n n 10

i A

R s

i m

v lau

e e

r s r i

R c a 13 14

iv n

i v

e FRESNO

r 19 !( 518 15 0 16 17 CLIMATE CHANGE AT 2030 CONDITIONS. YEAR ALTERNATIVES ARE SIMULATED PROJECTED WITH SAME AS FORTHENO ACTION ALTERNATIVE. MODEL RESULTS ALTERNATIVE FOR 2 ARE THE RESULTS ARE FORMODELLAYER 6. NOTES: DUE TO PROJECT (FEET) PROJECT TO DUE CHANGE GROUNDWATER-LEVEL LEGEND 1 !( 20 CVHM WATER BALANCE SUBREGION (WBS) CVHM WATER SUBREGION BALANCE 100 to200 50 to100 25 to50 10 to25 2 to10 -2 to2 -10 to-2 -25 to-10 -50 to-25 -100 to-50 -200 to-100 CITY 21 !( BAKERSFIELD Kern River 60 2 Miles 120 $

This page left blank intentionally.

MAP LEGEND ! CITY H EXAMPLE LOCATION 1 CVHM WATER BALANCE SUBREGION (WBS)

CHART LEGEND REFERENCE LINE FOR ZERO CHANGE BETWEEN ALTERNATIVES HEAD-DIFFERENCE (FEET) FOR ALTERNATIVE 2 AND NAA VERSUS SBC NOTES:

ALTERNATIVES ARE SIMULATED WITH PROJECTED CLIMATE CHANGE AT YEAR 2030 FOR ALL CONDITIONS.

GRAPHS DISPLAYED ARE FOR MODEL LAYER 6.

MODEL RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 2 ARE THE SAME AS THOSE FOR THE NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE.

NAA = NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE.

SBC = SECOND BASIS OF COMPARISON.

EUREKA ! ! REDDING

Nevada !SACRAMENTO

! P MODESTO a c if ic NORTH CVHM O c ACTIVE DOMAIN e a P n a c if i c ! O BAKERSFIELD c e a n

PROJ\\YOSEMITEZ:\USBUREAUOFRECLAMATIO\427225\MODELING\3WORKSPACE\CVHM_GIS\FIGURES\MXD\FIG_7.20_ALT2_SBC_HGRAPH_N.MXD 5/20/2015 VICINITY MAP $ 0 40 80 Miles Service Layer Credits: USGS (2009) $

Figure 7.20 Forecast Groundwater-Level Change Hydrographs for Alternative 2 and No Action Alternative Compared to Second Basis of Comparison at Example Locations in the Sacramento Valley MAP LEGEND ! CITY H EXAMPLE LOCATION 1 CVHM WATER BALANCE SUBREGION (WBS)

CHART LEGEND REFERENCE LINE FOR ZERO CHANGE BETWEEN ALTERNATIVES HEAD-DIFFERENCE (FEET) FOR ALTERNATIVE 2 AND NAA VERSUS SBC NOTES:

ALTERNATIVES ARE SIMULATED WITH PROJECTED CLIMATE CHANGE AT YEAR 2030 FOR ALL CONDITIONS.

GRAPHS DISPLAYED ARE FOR MODEL LAYER 6.

MODEL RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 2 ARE THE SAME AS THOSE FOR THE NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE.

NAA = NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE.

SBC = SECOND BASIS OF COMPARISON.

! EUREKA !REDDING

Nevada

!SACRAMENTO

!MODESTO P a c SOUTH CVHM if ic ACTIVE DOMAIN O P c a e c a if n ic O ! c BAKERSFIELD e a n

VICINITY MAP $ 0 40 80 Miles Service Layer Credits: USGS (2009) $ PROJ\\YOSEMITE\\YOSEMITE\PROJ\USBUREAUOFRECLAMATIO\427225\MODELING\3WORKSPACE\CVHM_GIS\FIGURES\MXD\FIG_7.21_ALT2_SBC_HGRAPH_S.MXD 5/20/2015 !

Figure 7.21 Forecast Groundwater-Level Change Hydrographs for Alternative 2 and No Action Alternative Compared to Second Basis of Comparison at Example Locations in the San Joaquin Valley MAP LEGEND ! CITY 1 CVHM WATER BALANCE SUBREGION (WBS)

CHART LEGEND ALTERNATIVE 1 VERSUS SBC ALTERNATIVE 2 VERSUS SBC

WBS1 ALTERNATIVE 3 VERSUS SBC ALTERNATIVE 4 VERSUS SBC 40 30 ALTERNATIVE 5 VERSUS SBC 20 NOTES: 10 No Change between Alternatives 0 MODEL RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 1 AND 4 ARE (TAF) -10 THE SAME AS FOR THE SECOND BASIS OF -20 COMPARISON (SBC). -30 MODEL RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 2 ARE THE -40

Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average SAME AS THOSE FOR THE NO ACTION 1 2 3 4 5 ALTERNATIVE (NAA). Alternative WBS5 ALTERNATIVES ARE SIMULATED WITH CLIMATE 40 Tr CHANGE AT YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS. in it 30 y R EUREKA iver 20 GRAPHS PRESENT AVERAGE CHANGE IN JULY 10 PUMPING VOLUME FOR THE CVHM SIMULATION PERIOD (1961-2003). 0

REDDING (TAF) -10 TAF = THOUSAND ACRE-FEET. -20 WBS2WBS2 -30 -40

40 1 Change Pumping July Average 1 2 3 4 5

30 S Alternative

20 c r a 10 m 0 en

(TAF) 2 t -10 o WBS4 R -20 i v 40 e -30 r 30 CHICO -40 Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average 20 1 2 3 4 5 No Change between Alternatives Alternative 10 0 (TAF) -10 -20 WBS3 5 -30 40 -40 Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average 30 1 2 3 4 5 20 4 Alternative 10 0 3 (TAF) -10 7 WBS7 -20 American River 40 -30 30 -40 20 Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average 1 2 3 4 5 Alternative SACRAMENTO 10 0

(TAF) -10 6 -20 WBS6 -30 40 8 -40 r Change Pumping July Average 30 9 e 1 2 3 4 5 iv 20 R Alternative s 10 u la 0 is n

(TAF) -10 ta S -20 SAN FRANCISCO WBS8 -30 MODESTO -40 40

Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average 1 2 3 4 5 30 Alternative 20 10 WBS9 0

40 (TAF) -10 30 -20 20 Sa -30 No Change between Alternatives n J 10 o -40

a Change Pumping July Average 0 q 1 2 3 4 5 u

(TAF) i Alternative -10 n R i -20 v FRESNO e -30 r -40 Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average 1 2 3 4 5 Alternative EUREKA ! ! REDDING

Nevada !SACRAMENTO

!MODESTO

NORTH CVHM P ACTIVE DOMAIN a c P i a fi c c BAKERSFIELD if i O Kern River c ! c O BAKERSFIELD e c a e n a n

PROJ\\YOSEMITEZ:\USBUREAUOFRECLAMATIO\427225\MODELING\3WORKSPACE\CVHM_GIS\FIGURES\MXD\FIG_7.22_ALTERNATIVES_SBC_PUMPINGN.MXD 5/20/2015 VICINITY MAP $ 0 40 80 Miles $ Service Layer Credits: USGS (2009)

! Figure 7.22 Long-term Average Change in July Agricultural Groundwater Pumping for Alternatives Compared to the Second Basis of Comparison in the Sacramento Valley MAP LEGEND REDDING ! CITY 1 CVHM WATER BALANCE SUBREGION (WBS)

CHART LEGEND

S ALTERNATIVE 1 VERSUS SBC

c r ALTERNATIVE 2 VERSUS SBC a m WBS11 e ALTERNATIVE 3 VERSUS SBC n t o 40 ALTERNATIVE 4 VERSUS SBC R 30 i v ALTERNATIVE 5 VERSUS SBC e 20 r CHICO 10 NOTES: 0 (TAF) -10 MODEL RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 1 AND 4 ARE -20 THE SAME AS FOR THE SECOND BASIS OF -30 COMPARISON (SBC). -40 Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average MODEL RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 2 ARE THE 1 2 3 4 5 Alternative SAME AS THOSE FOR THE NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE (NAA).

WBS13 ALTERNATIVES ARE SIMULATED WITH CLIMATE WBS12 CHANGE AT YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS. 40 40 30 30 GRAPHS PRESENT AVERAGE CHANGE IN JULY 20 20 PUMPING VOLUME FOR THE CVHM SIMULATION PERIOD (1961-2003). 10 10 0 0 TAF = THOUSAND ACRE-FEET. -10 -10 (TAF) (TAF) -20 -20 -30 -30 -40 -40

1 2 3 4 5 Change Pumping July Average 1 2 3 4 5 Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average Alternative Alternative r e iv R s u WBS16 a l 40 is n 30 ta S SAN FRANCISCO 20 10 MODESTO No Change between Alternatives 0 (TAF) -10 WBS10 -20 40 -30

30 Change Pumping July Average -40 WBS17 1 2 3 4 5 20 40 Alternative 10 30 Sa 0 n 20

(TAF) J o -10 a 10 q u -20 i 0 n -30 R (TAF) -10 iv FRESNO e -20 Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average -40 r 1 2 3 4 5 -30 Alternative -40

Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average 1 2 3 4 5 Alternative

WBS14 40 WBS18 30 40 20 30 10 20 0 10 (TAF) -10 0 -20 -10 -30 (TAF) WBS15 -20 -40 -30 Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average 1 2 3 4 5 40 -40 Alternative 30 1 2 3 4 5 20 Change Pumping July Average Alternative BAKERSFIELD 10 Kern River 0 (TAF) -10 WBS20 -20 40 -30 30 -40

Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average 20 1 2 3 4 5 Alternative 10 0

(TAF) -10 -20 WBS19 -30 ! EUREKA ! -40 REDDING 40 Change Pumping July Average 1 2 3 4 5 30 Alternative 20 Nevada 10 0

!SACRAMENTO -10 WBS21 (TAF) -20 40 -30 30 !MODESTO -40 20 1 2 3 4 5 Average July Pumping Change Change Pumping July Average 10 SOUTH CVHM Alternative ACTIVE DOMAIN 0 (TAF) P P -10 a a c c -20 if i i fi c c -30 O ! O c BAKERSFIELD e c MITEZ:\USBUREAUOFRECLAMATIO\427225\MODELING\3WORKSPACE\CVHM_GIS\FIGURES\MXD\FIG_7.23_ALTERNATIVES_SBC_PUMPINGS.MXD 5/20/2015 -40 a e Change Pumping July Average n a n 1 2 3 4 5 Alternative

PROJ\\YOSE VICINITY MAP $ 0 40 80 Miles $ Service Layer Credits: USGS (2009) ! SAN DIEGO

Figure 7.23 Long-term Average Change in July Agricultural Groundwater Pumping for Alternatives Compared to the Second Basis of Comparison in the San Joaquin Valley LEGEND T r in !( CITY !( it EUREKA y Ri r ve 1 CVHM WATER BALANCE SUBREGION (WBS) GROUNDWATER-LEVEL CHANGE !( REDDING DUE TO PROJECT (FEET) 1 -200 to -100 -100 to -50 -50 to -25

c -25 to -10 r a 2 m -10 to -2 e n -2 to 2 t o !( R CHICO 2 to 10

i v

e 10 to 25 r 5 25 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 200 3 NOTES: 4

Feather River RESULTS ARE FOR MODEL LAYER 6. 7 American Riv er MODEL RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 1 AND 4 ARE THE SAME AS FOR THE SECOND BASIS OF COMPARISON. !( 6 SACRAMENTO ALTERNATIVES ARE SIMULATED WITH PROJECTED CLIMATE CHANGE AT YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS. 8

r e iv R 9 s lau nis !( SAN FRANCISCO Sta 11 !( MODESTO 12 S a n J o a q u P in a R 13 c iv if 10 er ic O c FRESNO e !( 16 a n 14 17

15 18

!EUREKA

20 19 Kern River !SACRAMENTO NEVADA P !( a BAKERSFIELD c if ic 21 O c e a n

CVHM ACTIVE DOMAIN CALIFORNIA

OSEMITE\PROJ\USBUREAUOFRECLAMATIO\427225\MODELING\3WORKSPACE\CVHM_GIS\FIGURES\MXD\UPDATES_20151019\FIG_7.24_ALT1ALT4_NAA_W.MXD 10/30/2015 ! SAN DIEGO Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, USGS, VICINITY MAP $ 0 60 120 Miles NOAA Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA,USGS (2009) $ YOSEMITE\\Y Figure 7.24 Forecast Groundwater-Level Changes for Alternative 1, Alternative 4, and Second Basis of Comparison Compared to No Action Alternative For Average July in a Future Wet Year LEGEND T r in !( CITY !( it EUREKA y Ri r ve 1 CVHM WATER BALANCE SUBREGION (WBS) GROUNDWATER-LEVEL CHANGE !( REDDING DUE TO PROJECT (FEET) 1 -200 to -100 -100 to -50 -50 to -25

c -25 to -10 r a 2 m -10 to -2 e n -2 to 2 t o !( R CHICO 2 to 10

i v

e 10 to 25 r 5 25 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 200 3 NOTES: 4

r e iv R 9 s lau nis !( SAN FRANCISCO Sta 11 !( MODESTO 12 S a n J o a q u P in a R 13 c iv if 10 er ic O c FRESNO e !( 16 a n 14 17

15 18

!EUREKA

20 19 Kern River !SACRAMENTO NEVADA P !( a BAKERSFIELD c if ic 21 O c e a n

CVHM ACTIVE DOMAIN CALIFORNIA

Figure 7.25 Forecast Groundwater-Level Changes for Alternative 1, Alternative 4, and Second Basis of Comparison Compared to No Action Alternative for Average July in a Future Above-Normal Year