DOCSLIB.ORG

Cratering of a Particle Bed by a Subsonic Turbulent Jet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cratering of a Particle Bed by a Subsonic Turbulent Jet CRATERING OF A PARTICLE BED BY A SUBSONIC TURBULENT JET By CASEY Q. LaMARCHE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2013 1 © 2013 Casey Q. LaMarche 2 To Rocky, my Mom and Cori 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor and mentor Prof. Jennifer Curtis, through your patience and guidance I have learned some of my most important life lessons. I am indebted to you for all of the knowledge you have provided to me. I would also like to thank my mother for offering me unconditional love and support through all of my journeys. Cori, you are my rock, I have so much to thank you for that goes beyond the text that can be contained here. I would also like to thank one of my mentors, Dr. Phil Metzger, for sharing his expertise in this area and teaching me I that if anything ever goes wrong, “it was put there.” I would like to thank my father for all of his love and help. Thomas Lemee, our long discussions of fluid mechanics never stop exciting me. I would also like to thank Stephen Arce for being an all-around great friend and showing me how aspects of granular flow can be used in interesting ways in different fields like biology. Jess Clawson and Mrs. Dahl I appreciate all of your help. Braden Snook and Gabe Tong have taught me more then they probably know. I hope they continue letting me mentor them. I would also like to acknowledge PIRE-NSF and NASA STTR Phase I and II for funding the work that is contained in this dissertation. I am grateful to Prof. Ranga Narayanan and Bungo Shiotani for all of their work for the PIRE program. I would like to acknowledge my officemates for the rich experiences we have shared. Thank you to Prof. Dickinson for the work you have done for the graduate students, you have worked with us on so many occasions to bring the department together as a cohesive unit. To all of my friends – thank you for keeping me sane. I owe you all so much. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. 8 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... 9 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ 12 ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... 13 CHAPTERS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 15 Future Terrestrial Space Exploration ....................................................................... 15 Previous Example: Apollo 12 Landing on Lunar Surface (Metzger et al., 2008) ..... 16 Permeability of Lunar Simulant JSC-1A .................................................................. 17 Multiphase Flow Modeling ....................................................................................... 18 Effects of Particle Shape on Cratering ..................................................................... 19 Cohesion and Fine Particles .................................................................................... 21 Cratering Mechanisms ............................................................................................. 22 Scaling Asymptotic Crater Depth ............................................................................. 24 Lunar Soil Simulants ................................................................................................ 26 2 PERMEABILITY OF LUNAR SOIL SIMULANT JSC-1A .......................................... 28 Motivation ................................................................................................................ 28 Background and Theory .......................................................................................... 28 Experimental Hardware and Techniques ................................................................. 31 Results and Discussion ........................................................................................... 33 Summary ................................................................................................................. 39 3 MODELING CRATER GROWTH USING THE TWO-FLUID MODEL ..................... 46 Motivation ................................................................................................................ 46 Model Equations ...................................................................................................... 48 Governing Equations ......................................................................................... 48 Frictional Stress Model ...................................................................................... 50 Methods ................................................................................................................... 53 Experimental Setup of Metzger et al. (2009a) ................................................... 53 Simulation Setup ............................................................................................... 53 Model Sensitivity ............................................................................................... 55 Experimental Validation ..................................................................................... 56 Simulation Predictions ....................................................................................... 56 5 Results and Discussion ........................................................................................... 57 Sensitivity Results ............................................................................................. 57 Frictional Model Study ....................................................................................... 58 Parametric Study – Measured and Predicted Crater Growth ............................ 61 Long Time Simulation ........................................................................................ 62 Domain Sensitivity – Effect of Center Wall ........................................................ 64 Simulations of Turning the Jet Off ..................................................................... 66 Cratering Mechanics ......................................................................................... 67 Summary ................................................................................................................. 71 4 EFFECT OF PARTICLE PROPERTIES ON CRATER DYNAMICS ........................ 98 Motivation ................................................................................................................ 98 Background .............................................................................................................. 98 Materials and Methods .......................................................................................... 101 Results and Discussions ........................................................................................ 105 Cratering Large Glass Spheres ....................................................................... 105 Effect of Particle Size and Density on Crater Growth ...................................... 110 Effect of Particle Shape on Crater Growth ...................................................... 115 Scaling Asymptotic Crater Depth .................................................................... 123 Summary ............................................................................................................... 129 5 CRATERING UNDER LUNAR CONDITIONS ....................................................... 151 Motivation .............................................................................................................. 151 Background ............................................................................................................ 151 Experimental Methods ........................................................................................... 156 HOOSH Based Experiments ........................................................................... 156 Lunar Regolith Experiments ............................................................................ 158 JSC-1A Bulk Density Cratering Experiments .................................................. 160 Results and Discussion ......................................................................................... 161 HOOSH Variable Gravity Experiments ............................................................ 161 Cratering of JSC-1A: Effect of Bulk Density and Jet Velocity .......................... 163 Segregation of JSC-1A During Cratering ........................................................ 165 Cratering Rates of Sieved JSC-1A versus Glass Spheres .............................. 165 Crater growth for Lunar Soil Simulants Chenobi and JSC-1A ......................... 167 Crater Shape Variations .................................................................................. 169 Scaling the Asymptotic Crater Depth .............................................................. 170 Summary ............................................................................................................... 172 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LUNAR INTERACTIONS ABSTRACTS of PAPERS PRESENTED at the CONFERENCE on INTERACTIONS of the INTERPLANETARY PLASMA with the MODERN and ANCIENT MOON
    LUNAR INTERACTIONS ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE CONFERENCE ON INTERACTIONS OF THE INTERPLANETARY PLASMA with the MODERN AND ANCIENT MOON ORGANIZED BY THE I. N 3 LUNAR SCIENCE INSTITUTE m I 3 AND THE I- 2 SPACE PHYSICS DEPARTMENT RICE UNIVERSITY sponsored by the NATIONAL AERONAUTICS m m AND 0 .. I-( OIW mrl SPACE ADMINISTRATION ZX CV OH IOI H WclU AND THE uux- V&H 0 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION g,,,, wm. WWO@W u u ? ZZLOX€e HW5H vlOHU ffiMHrnfC 4 ffi H 2.~4~4a Edited by 3 dz ,.aV)ffiuJO ffiwcstn WPt.4" DAVID R. CRISWELL ,!a !a Pl r 4 W Pa4 %- rn ZW. and Or=4OcC+J fO Hi4 r WWF I rnU2.M ffiBZ* JOHN W. FREEMAN UUW4aJ I amor 0 alffiwffi E REPRODUCTION RESTRICTIONS OVERRIDDEN 2Z~OZ E 2 2 .: u Bmscientific ma Technical Information FaciLitX -eu $4 to) Copyright O 1974 by the Lunar Science Institute Conference held at George Williams College Lake Geneva Campus Williams Bay, Wisconsin 30 September - 4 October 1974 Compiled by and available from The Lunar Science Institute 3303 Nasa Road 1 Houston, Texas 77058 PREFACE The field of lunar science has essentially completed a period of exponential growth promoted by the national efforts of the 1960's to land on the moon. As normally happens in a diverse scientific community, the interpretations of specialized lunar data have reflected the precepts in the various specialized fields. Constant promotion of the broadest overviews between these diverse fields is appropriate to identify processes or phenomenon recog- nized in one avenue of investigation which may have great importance in explaining the data of other specialities.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Impact Crater Identification and Age Estimation with Chang’E
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20215-y OPEN Lunar impact crater identification and age estimation with Chang’E data by deep and transfer learning ✉ Chen Yang 1,2 , Haishi Zhao 3, Lorenzo Bruzzone4, Jon Atli Benediktsson 5, Yanchun Liang3, Bin Liu 2, ✉ ✉ Xingguo Zeng 2, Renchu Guan 3 , Chunlai Li 2 & Ziyuan Ouyang1,2 1234567890():,; Impact craters, which can be considered the lunar equivalent of fossils, are the most dominant lunar surface features and record the history of the Solar System. We address the problem of automatic crater detection and age estimation. From initially small numbers of recognized craters and dated craters, i.e., 7895 and 1411, respectively, we progressively identify new craters and estimate their ages with Chang’E data and stratigraphic information by transfer learning using deep neural networks. This results in the identification of 109,956 new craters, which is more than a dozen times greater than the initial number of recognized craters. The formation systems of 18,996 newly detected craters larger than 8 km are esti- mated. Here, a new lunar crater database for the mid- and low-latitude regions of the Moon is derived and distributed to the planetary community together with the related data analysis. 1 College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, 130061 Changchun, China. 2 Key Laboratory of Lunar and Deep Space Exploration, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China. 3 Key Laboratory of Symbol Computation and Knowledge Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, 130012 Changchun, China. 4 Department of Information Engineering and Computer ✉ Science, University of Trento, I-38122 Trento, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 28 May 2020 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Halukeerthi, Siriney O. and Shephard, Jacob J. and Talewar, Sukhpreet K. and Evans, John S. O. and Rosu-Finsen, Alexander and Salzmann, Christoph G. (2020) 'Amorphous mixtures of ice and C60 fullerene.', Journal of physical chemistry A., 124 (24). pp. 5015-5022. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.0c03439 Publisher's copyright statement: This document is the unedited Author's version of a Submitted Work that was subsequently accepted for publication in Journal of Physical Chemistry A, copyright c American Chemical Society after peer review. To access the nal edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.0c03439 Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF DURHAM A: Environmental, Combustion, and Atmospheric Chemistry; Aerosol Processes, Geochemistry, and Astrochemistry Amorphous Mixtures of Ice and C60 Fullerene Siriney O.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the January 25, 2010, Meeting of the Board of Regents
    MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 25, 2010, MEETING OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS ATTENDANCE This scheduled meeting of the Board of Regents was held on Monday, January 25, 2010, in the Regents’ Room of the Smithsonian Institution Castle. The meeting included morning, afternoon, and executive sessions. Board Chair Patricia Q. Stonesifer called the meeting to order at 8:31 a.m. Also present were: The Chief Justice 1 Sam Johnson 4 John W. McCarter Jr. Christopher J. Dodd Shirley Ann Jackson David M. Rubenstein France Córdova 2 Robert P. Kogod Roger W. Sant Phillip Frost 3 Doris Matsui Alan G. Spoon 1 Paul Neely, Smithsonian National Board Chair David Silfen, Regents’ Investment Committee Chair 2 Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Senators Thad Cochran and Patrick J. Leahy, and Representative Xavier Becerra were unable to attend the meeting. Also present were: G. Wayne Clough, Secretary John Yahner, Speechwriter to the Secretary Patricia L. Bartlett, Chief of Staff to the Jeffrey P. Minear, Counselor to the Chief Justice Secretary T.A. Hawks, Assistant to Senator Cochran Amy Chen, Chief Investment Officer Colin McGinnis, Assistant to Senator Dodd Virginia B. Clark, Director of External Affairs Kevin McDonald, Assistant to Senator Leahy Barbara Feininger, Senior Writer‐Editor for the Melody Gonzales, Assistant to Congressman Office of the Regents Becerra Grace L. Jaeger, Program Officer for the Office David Heil, Assistant to Congressman Johnson of the Regents Julie Eddy, Assistant to Congresswoman Matsui Richard Kurin, Under Secretary for History, Francisco Dallmeier, Head of the National Art, and Culture Zoological Park’s Center for Conservation John K.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Open-File Report 2005-1190, Table 1
    TABLE 1 GEOLOGIC FIELD-TRAINING OF NASA ASTRONAUTS BETWEEN JANUARY 1963 AND NOVEMBER 1972 The following is a year-by-year listing of the astronaut geologic field training trips planned and led by personnel from the U.S. Geological Survey’s Branches of Astrogeology and Surface Planetary Exploration, in collaboration with the Geology Group at the Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston, Texas at the request of NASA between January 1963 and November 1972. Regional geologic experts from the U.S. Geological Survey and other governmental organizations and universities s also played vital roles in these exercises. [The early training (between 1963 and 1967) involved a rather large contingent of astronauts from NASA groups 1, 2, and 3. For another listing of the astronaut geologic training trips and exercises, including all attending and the general purposed of the exercise, the reader is referred to the following website containing a contribution by William Phinney (Phinney, book submitted to NASA/JSC; also http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/ap-geotrips.pdf).] 1963 16-18 January 1963: Meteor Crater and San Francisco Volcanic Field near Flagstaff, Arizona (9 astronauts). Among the nine astronaut trainees in Flagstaff for that initial astronaut geologic training exercise was Neil Armstrong--who would become the first man to step foot on the Moon during the historic Apollo 11 mission in July 1969! The other astronauts present included Frank Borman (Apollo 8), Charles "Pete" Conrad (Apollo 12), James Lovell (Apollo 8 and the near-tragic Apollo 13), James McDivitt, Elliot See (killed later in a plane crash), Thomas Stafford (Apollo 10), Edward White (later killed in the tragic Apollo 1 fire at Cape Canaveral), and John Young (Apollo 16).
    [Show full text]
  • No. 40. the System of Lunar Craters, Quadrant Ii Alice P
    NO. 40. THE SYSTEM OF LUNAR CRATERS, QUADRANT II by D. W. G. ARTHUR, ALICE P. AGNIERAY, RUTH A. HORVATH ,tl l C.A. WOOD AND C. R. CHAPMAN \_9 (_ /_) March 14, 1964 ABSTRACT The designation, diameter, position, central-peak information, and state of completeness arc listed for each discernible crater in the second lunar quadrant with a diameter exceeding 3.5 km. The catalog contains more than 2,000 items and is illustrated by a map in 11 sections. his Communication is the second part of The However, since we also have suppressed many Greek System of Lunar Craters, which is a catalog in letters used by these authorities, there was need for four parts of all craters recognizable with reasonable some care in the incorporation of new letters to certainty on photographs and having diameters avoid confusion. Accordingly, the Greek letters greater than 3.5 kilometers. Thus it is a continua- added by us are always different from those that tion of Comm. LPL No. 30 of September 1963. The have been suppressed. Observers who wish may use format is the same except for some minor changes the omitted symbols of Blagg and Miiller without to improve clarity and legibility. The information in fear of ambiguity. the text of Comm. LPL No. 30 therefore applies to The photographic coverage of the second quad- this Communication also. rant is by no means uniform in quality, and certain Some of the minor changes mentioned above phases are not well represented. Thus for small cra- have been introduced because of the particular ters in certain longitudes there are no good determi- nature of the second lunar quadrant, most of which nations of the diameters, and our values are little is covered by the dark areas Mare Imbrium and better than rough estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Tazewell County Warren County Westmoreland~CO~Tt~~'~Dfla
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. Tazewell County Warren County Westmoreland~CO~tt~~'~dfla Bedford Bristol Buena Vista Charl~esville ~ake clnr(~ F:Org I Heights Covington Danville Emporia Fairfax Falls ~.~tur.~~l~).~ ~urg Galax Hampton HarrisonburgHopj~ll~l Lexingtor~ynchburgl~'~assa ~ anassas Martinsville Newport News Norfolk Norton PetersbutrgPoque~o~ .Portsmouth Radford Richmond Roano~l~~ Salem ~th Bostor~t~nto SuffoLk Virginia Beach Waynesboro Williamsburg Winchester ~a~:~ingham Ceuul~ Carroll County Charlotte County Cra~ Col~ty Roar~ County~cco~Lac= Albemarle County Alleghany County Amelia County#~rlb~ ~NJ~/Ly,~ll~iatt~ County Arlington CountyAugula County Bath i~nty BerJ~rd Cd~t B.I.... ~1 County Botetourt County Brunswick County Buchanal~C~ut~ ~~wrtty Caroline County Charles City C~nty Ch~erfield~bunty C~rrke Co~t CT~-~eperCounty Dickenson County Dinwiddie County~ ~~~ r-'luvanneCounty Frederick County C~ucester (~unty C~yson (j~nty Gre~=~ County Greensville County Halifax County Hanover County ~ .(D~I~ I~liry Cottnty Highland County Isle of *~.P-.o.~t~l~me~y C~ ~county King George County King William County~r .(~,t~ ~ (~'~ Loudoun County Louisa County M~ Mat~s Cot]1~l~~ qt... ~ Montgomery County New Kent County North~ur~d County N~y County Page County Pittsylvania CouniY--Powhatan]~.~unty Princ~eorg, oC'6-~ty Prince William County Rappahannock County Richmol~l 0~)1~1=I~Woo~ Gi0ochtandCounty Lunenburg County Mecklenburl~nty Nelson Count Northampton CountyOrange County Patrick CountyPdn¢~
    [Show full text]
  • DMAAC – February 1973
    LUNAR TOPOGRAPHIC ORTHOPHOTOMAP (LTO) AND LUNAR ORTHOPHOTMAP (LO) SERIES (Published by DMATC) Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Scale: 1:250,000 Projection: Transverse Mercator Sheet Size: 25.5”x 26.5” The Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Series are the first comprehensive and continuous mapping to be accomplished from Apollo Mission 15-17 mapping photographs. This series is also the first major effort to apply recent advances in orthophotography to lunar mapping. Presently developed maps of this series were designed to support initial lunar scientific investigations primarily employing results of Apollo Mission 15-17 data. Individual maps of this series cover 4 degrees of lunar latitude and 5 degrees of lunar longitude consisting of 1/16 of the area of a 1:1,000,000 scale Lunar Astronautical Chart (LAC) (Section 4.2.1). Their apha-numeric identification (example – LTO38B1) consists of the designator LTO for topographic orthophoto editions or LO for orthophoto editions followed by the LAC number in which they fall, followed by an A, B, C or D designator defining the pertinent LAC quadrant and a 1, 2, 3, or 4 designator defining the specific sub-quadrant actually covered. The following designation (250) identifies the sheets as being at 1:250,000 scale. The LTO editions display 100-meter contours, 50-meter supplemental contours and spot elevations in a red overprint to the base, which is lithographed in black and white. LO editions are identical except that all relief information is omitted and selenographic graticule is restricted to border ticks, presenting an umencumbered view of lunar features imaged by the photographic base.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Craters on Europa and Implications for Cratered Surfaces
    Vol 437|20 October 2005|doi:10.1038/nature04069 LETTERS Secondary craters on Europa and implications for cratered surfaces Edward B. Bierhaus1, Clark R. Chapman2 & William J. Merline2 For several decades, most planetary researchers have regarded the craters were typically not spatially random, but instead appeared in impact crater populations on solid-surfaced planets and smaller clumps and clusters16 even at distances far (several hundred kilo- bodies as predominantly reflecting the direct (‘primary’) impacts metres) from the nearest large primary crater. This clustered spatial of asteroids and comets1. Estimates of the relative and absolute distribution contrasts with primary impacts, which are spatially ages of geological units on these objects have been based on this random. The low spatial density and unusual non-random spatial assumption2. Here we present an analysis of the comparatively distribution of Europa’s small craters enabled us to achieve what has sparse crater population on Jupiter’s icy moon Europa and suggest been previously difficult, namely unambiguous identification and that this assumption is incorrect for small craters. We find that quantification of the contribution of distant secondary craters to the ‘secondaries’ (craters formed by material ejected from large total crater SFD. This, in turn, allows us to re-examine the overall primary impact craters) comprise about 95 per cent of the small crater age-dating methodology. We discuss the specifics of the craters (diameters less than 1 km) on Europa. We therefore con- Europa data first. clude that large primary impacts into a solid surface (for example, We measured more than 17,000 craters in 87 low-compression, ice or rock) produce far more secondaries than previously low-sun, high-resolution Europa images (scales ,60 m pixel21), believed, implying that the small crater populations on the which cover nine regions totalling 0.2% of Europa’s surface (a much Moon, Mars and other large bodies must be dominated by larger percentage of Europa has been imaged at lower resolutions), secondaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubex: a Compact X-Ray Telescope Enables Both X-Ray Fluorescence Imaging Spectroscopy and Pulsar Timing Based Navigation
    SSC18-V-05 CubeX: A compact X-Ray Telescope Enables both X-Ray Fluorescence Imaging Spectroscopy and Pulsar Timing Based Navigation Jan Stupl, Monica Ebert, David Mauro SGT / NASA Ames NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA; 650-604-4032 [email protected] JaeSub Hong Harvard University Cambridge, MA Suzanne Romaine, Almus Kenter, Janet Evans, Ralph Kraft Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Cambridge, MA Larry Nittler Carnegie Institution of Washington Washington, DC Ian Crawford Birkbeck College London, UK David Kring Lunar and Planetary Institute Houston, TX Noah Petro, Keith. Gendreau, Jason Mitchell, Luke Winternitz NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD Rebecca. Masterson, Gregory Prigozhin Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA Brittany Wickizer NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA Kellen Bonner, Ashley Clark, Arwen Dave, Andres Dono-Perez, Ali Kashani, Daniel Larrabee, Samuel Montez, Karolyn Ronzano, Tim Snyder MEI / NASA Ames Research Center Joel Mueting, Laura Plice Metis / NASA Ames Research Center NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA Yueh-Liang Shen, Duy Nguyen Booz Allen Hamilton / NASA Ames NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA Stupl 1 32nd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites ABSTRACT This paper describes the miniaturized X-ray telescope payload, CubeX, in the context of a lunar mission. The first part describes the payload in detail, the second part summarizes a small satellite mission concept that utilizes its compact form factor and performance. This instrument can be used for both X-ray fluorescence (XRF) imaging spectroscopy and X-ray pulsar timing-based navigation (XNAV). It combines high angular resolution (<1 arcminutes) Miniature Wolter-I X-ray optics (MiXO) with a common focal plane consisting of high spectral resolution (<150 eV at 1 keV) CMOS X-ray sensors and a high timing resolution (< 1 µsec) SDD X-ray sensor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Compact X-Ray Telescope Enables Both X-Ray Fluorescence Imaging Spectroscopy and Pulsar Timing Based Navigation
    CubeX: A compact X-Ray Telescope Enables both X-Ray Fluorescence Imaging Spectroscopy and Pulsar Timing Based Navigation Jan Stupl SGT / NASA Ames Research Center Jaesub Hong Harvard & the CubeX team 32nd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites – August 2018 1 2 Remote sensing XRF measurements provide insight into the geology of planetary bodies. 3 Can we navigate Deep Space autonomously? CubeX will also conduct semi-autonomous navigation by using precise time series from millisecond X-ray pulsars as “GPS” in our Galaxy. Competition Sensitive 4 X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS) Terrain Camera LGA Battery X-band Radio Miniature X-ray Reaction Wheels Optics (MiXO) 50 cm focal length Solar X-ray Monitor (SXM) Propulsion Solar Panel System (0.4 m2) Star Tracker Focal plane of CMOS & SDD Thruster • ~6U CubeSat X-ray Telescope: 5.8 kg with 8.6W (S/C: ~40U) X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS) and Solar X-ray Monitor (SXM) • XIS covers 0.4 – 7 keV with <150 eV FWHM @ 1 keV, 1 sq. deg FoV with < 1 arcmin Ang. Res.: 2 – 3 km resolution with 110 km foot print at 6000 km; < 1 µsec timing resolution for XNAV • SXM covers >130 deg FWZI with energy range of 1 – 8 keV 5 ~10 cm 34 NiCo shells Spider Fixture • Achieve <1 arcmin resolution (Al) over 1 sq. deg and 24 cm2 on- axis & 12 cm2 off-axis (@ 33 arcmin) effective area at 1 keV • 34 lightweight NiCo ENR shells (200 µm thick) in a butterfly design with 10 cm dia. x 8 cm length envelope (~1.5 kg) for 50 Cross-sectional view of 34 shells cm focal length Effective area (left) and angular resolution in HPD (right) as a function of off-axis for several discrete energies (color-coded) estimated by ray-tracing simulations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: an Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 266 012 SE 046 389 AUTHOR Paige, John C. TITLE The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: An Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO NPS-D-189 PUB DATE 85 NOTE 293p.; Photographs may not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC12 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Conservation (Environment); Employment Programs; *Environmental Education; *Federal Programs; Forestry; Natural Resources; Parks; *Physical Environment; *Resident Camp Programs; Soil Conservation IDENTIFIERS *Civilian Conservation Corps; Environmental Management; *National Park Service ABSTRACT The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) has been credited as one of Franklin D. Roosevelt's most successful effortsto conserve both the natural and human resources of the nation. This publication provides a review of the program and its impacton resource conservation, environmental management, and education. Chapters give accounts of: (1) the history of the CCC (tracing its origins, establishment, and termination); (2) the National Park Service role (explaining national and state parkprograms and co-operative planning elements); (3) National Park Servicecamps (describing programs and personnel training and education); (4) contributions of the CCC (identifying the major benefits ofthe program in the areas of resource conservation, park and recreational development, and natural and archaeological history finds); and (5) overall
    [Show full text]