DOCSLIB.ORG

AOS & CICS Newsletter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AOS & CICS Newsletter AOS & CICS Newsletter Spring/Summer 2010 Volume 4, Number 2 “During my time here, I’ve had a chance to Gnanadesikan interact with biological, physical and chemical oceanographers, atmospheric Moving On After 15 dynamicists and chemists, terrestrial Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (AOS) & ecologists and mechanical engineers. Years Princeton is an outstanding place to get a The Cooperative Institute for broad view of how our planet works.” Climate Science (CICS) “Anand is tireless in his dedication to discovery. He’s passionate about the Inside this issue: development of climate models and their Gnanadesikan Moving On.………….1 continuous evolution,” AOS Director Jorge Sarmiento said. “Not only is he a Oey’s Research Featured in dedicated scientist, he is an esteemed Interview………………………………….1 colleague and mentor to his students. He will be sorely missed.” Jerry D. Mahlman Lobby is Dedicated…………………………………2 Regarding continuing collaborations at GFDL and Princeton, Gnanadesikan said, SEAS-AOS-GFDL Workshop…………2 “I also anticipate continuing the GFDL Oceanographer & AOS Lecturer collaborations I’ve been fortunate enough Conference “Empowers” Women Anand Gnanadesikan to build here in the past fifteen years, and in Science…………………………………3 hope to be able to build new bridges to the paleoclimate and observational Rossi and Slater Honored……………3 After 15 years at Princeton, GFDL communities. I look forward to our Oceanographer and AOS Faculty Member continuing to learn about the planet GFDLEA Annual 5K Race…………….4 Anand Gnanadesikan has accepted a together!” tenured associate professor position at the Research in Action…………………….4 Earth and Planetary Sciences Department Outside of work, he is extensively involved at Johns Hopkins University. He will in outreach though programs such as AOS & CICS News……………………..5 Science Olympiad, the largest national begin his appointment in January, 2011. team science competition for secondary Gnanadesikan’s research interests focus on schools, and through working with understanding the mechanisms that drive museums to help bring up-to-date science Oey’s Research the large-scale physical circulation of the into exhibitions. ocean and the impact of changes in this Featured in Times circulation for climate, ocean chemistry, Gnanadesikan earned his undergraduate and ecosystems. Using general circulation degree in Physics from Princeton of Trenton models of the ocean and atmosphere and University and his Ph.D. in Oceanography examining how these simulate not only the from the Joint Program in Oceanography at MIT/Woods Hole Oceanographic Interview physical climate, but quantities such as radiocarbon, oxygen, and nutrients, has led Institution. ■ AOS Researcher Leo Oey was featured him to look at how human activities might June 14 in The Times of Trenton in an TigerTransit/Shuttle Services perturb the carbon cycle. Over the years, interview addressing the BP oil spill. he has been very involved in the Operating on development of new models at GFDL, Summer Schedule: The article discussed the overlap between including ocean-only models, coupled http://www.princeton.edu/transportatio Oey’s work in ocean modeling and the ocean atmosphere models, and models of n/ForrestalSummer10.pdf estimated distribution of oil from the spill. biogeochemical cycling. Using the Princeton Ocean Model (POM), co-developed by Oey, George Mellor, and The article in its entirety can be found at: Alan Blumberg in the early eighties, Oey http://www.nj.com/mercer/index.ssf/2010/ and his research team entered thousands of 06/gulf_view_not_a_pretty_picture.html ■ simulated particles at the coordinates of the spill site and had the computers crunch out the data of how those particles are likely to move and spread over time. Jerry D. Mahlman Lobby is Dedicated On Tuesday, May 4th, 2010 the newly renovated GFDL lobby was named the “Jerry D. Mahlman Lobby,” in honor of Jerry Mahlman, former director of GFDL and lecturer with rank of professor in the Jerry Mahlman, former director of GFDL and AOS Program. The dedication ceremony lecturer with rank of professor in the AOS was attended by Jerry’s and Janet’s Program daughter, Julie, and the many friends and colleagues who had the pleasure of From 2000-2009, Mahlman was a senior AOS Researcher Leo Oey working with Jerry throughout the years. research associate at the National Center “What we did was to release (simulated) for Atmospheric Research. In recent years, particles at the spill site and we track that he has been centrally involved in the in time for weeks, for months [sic],” Oey communication of climate change science told the Times. “And we throw in many to a wide variety of audiences, and assists particles and then we do some statistical in guiding the international policy analysis to average them and get a sense of deliberation process through the where those particles might go.” interpretation of climate science. "There's a big assumption, of course: We During the span of his illustrious career, assume that the oil will also follow the Mahlman published over 100 scientific particles' movements. They generally do, papers. Among his many awards, he but not exactly," Oey said in the article. received the U.S. Department of Commerce Gold Medal in 1986, the He cautioned that long range ocean modeling isn’t specifically equipped to Jerry and Janet Mahlman’s daughter, Julie, at American Geophysical Union First Annual th predict the movement of an oil spill, the May 4 lobby dedication Jule G. Charney Lecturer Award in 1993, because the models don’t calculate in the Mahlman’s NOAA career began on the day the Presidential Distinguished Rank Award properties specific to oil. Instead, the agency was created, October 3, 1970 in 1994, and the highest honor given by the modeling focuses on historical data of when he joined Joseph Smagorinsky and American Meteorological Society, the current locations and shifts, as well as wind Syukuro (Suki) Manabe in their pioneering Carl-Gustaf Rossby Research Medal, in patterns that affect ocean currents. efforts to develop atmospheric circulation 1994. models at GFDL. During his three decades In discussing the Loop Current, a high- at GFDL, Mahlman was a pioneer in Mahlman received his undergraduate speed stream that pulses north into the Gulf stratospheric dynamics and chemistry as degree from Chadron State College in 1962 of Mexico and travels in a clockwise well as numerical modeling. He added and earned his Ph.D. from Colorado State pattern toward Florida, Oey told the Times significantly to the understanding of how University in 1967. ■ that the POM estimates that, at most, 10 climate works and spent much of his career percent or so of the surface particles that modeling how Earth's atmosphere responds originate at the spill site could get caught to the steady buildup of greenhouse gases. SEAS-AOS-GFDL up in the main Loop Current and Gulf Stream. He added, however, that this Under Mahlman’s tenure as director, Workshop held on figure is a worst-case scenario. GFDL continued to recruit highly talented scientists and provide an intellectually Main Campus He also noted that despite the model’s stimulating environment for them, a sophistication, the forecasting done thus far tradition begun by Smagorinsky, the lab’s A Student-Postdoc workshop on Fluid via the POM has focused on what happens first director. “I am proud that we are able Dynamics & the Global Environment was at or near the surface; it doesn’t take into to attract, nurture and retain these young held at the Friend Center on Friday, May account the oil plume at depth. In response, scientists,” Mahlman said just prior to his 21st, with some 35 people in attendance. Oey and his team are beginning to examine retirement from GFDL in 2000. Today, The workshop, organized by the School of simulated particles at 800 meters below the some ten years later, this legacy of support Engineering and Applied Sciences surface. for younger scientists at GFDL remains Program, the Atmospheric and Oceanic one of the key elements to the lab's Sciences Program, and GFDL, focused on continued success. environmental fluid dynamics. Workshop Commenting on the workshop, Palter said, The professional development sessions sessions ran from 9 a.m. to approximately "The Fluid Dynamics & the Global covered issues such as: strategies for 3 p.m. and covered such topics as: Environment Student-Postdoc meeting funding, proposal writing, negotiations, “Weather and Climate Simulations,” gave AOS and GFDL postdocs and and balancing work and family. The “Turbulence, Instabilities, and students a unique opportunity to interact agenda also included time for one-on-one Fundamentals,” and “Flows and Fluxes in with students and postdocs in Princeton's interaction between junior and senior Complex Geometries.” "As GFDL and the engineering departments. It is unusual to scientists as well as unstructured time for AOS program move towards thinking be at a workshop in which research ranges informal networking. “The Patullo about smaller spatial scales and coupling from the sub-millimeter scale of surface- Conference was a great way to meet a large with biological systems, we are finding the tension driven flows through flexible number of the female students and engineering community moving up to the membranes to the global scale of climate postdocs working in physical scales which we care about,” AOS Faculty modeling." ■ oceanography today. We had a lot of Member and GFDL Oceanographer Anand intense discussions, but also some fun Gnanadesikan said. kayaking in the alligator-filled river. I wish this sort of opportunity to talk and Among the speakers were AOS and CICS Conference learn about all the aspects of a scientific Researchers Rym Msadek, Joseph Kidston, career had been around when I was a Mehmet Ilicak, and Jaime Palter. During “Empowers” postdoc 15 years ago,” Legg added. the “Weather and Climate Simulations” session, Msadek presented predictability Women in Science The Pattullo Conference was held May 23- results based on GFDL coupled model 26, 2010 in Charleston, South Carolina.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Roots of Ensemble Forecasting
    JULY 2005 L E W I S 1865 Roots of Ensemble Forecasting JOHN M. LEWIS National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma, and Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada (Manuscript received 19 August 2004, in final form 10 December 2004) ABSTRACT The generation of a probabilistic view of dynamical weather prediction is traced back to the early 1950s, to that point in time when deterministic short-range numerical weather prediction (NWP) achieved its earliest success. Eric Eady was the first meteorologist to voice concern over strict determinism—that is, a future determined by the initial state without account for uncertainties in that state. By the end of the decade, Philip Thompson and Edward Lorenz explored the predictability limits of deterministic forecasting and set the stage for an alternate view—a stochastic–dynamic view that was enunciated by Edward Epstein. The steps in both operational short-range NWP and extended-range forecasting that justified a coupling between probability and dynamical law are followed. A discussion of the bridge from theory to practice follows, and the study ends with a genealogy of ensemble forecasting as an outgrowth of traditions in the history of science. 1. Introduction assumption). And with guidance and institutional sup- port from John von Neumann at Princeton’s Institute Determinism was the basic tenet of physics from the for Advanced Study, Charney and his team of research- time of Newton (late 1600s) until the late 1800s. Simply ers used this principle to make two successful 24-h fore- stated, the future state of a system is completely deter- casts of the transient features of the large-scale flow mined by the present state of the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from the Coriolis Global Data Center in France (Ftp://Ftp.Ifremer.Fr)
    remote sensing Article Impact of Enhanced Wave-Induced Mixing on the Ocean Upper Mixed Layer during Typhoon Nepartak in a Regional Model of the Northwest Pacific Ocean Chengcheng Yu 1 , Yongzeng Yang 2,3,4, Xunqiang Yin 2,3,4,*, Meng Sun 2,3,4 and Yongfang Shi 2,3,4 1 Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316000, China; [email protected] 2 First Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266061, China; yangyz@fio.org.cn (Y.Y.); sunm@fio.org.cn (M.S.); shiyf@fio.org.cn (Y.S.) 3 Laboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical Modeling, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266071, China 4 Key Laboratory of Marine Science and Numerical Modeling (MASNUM), Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266061, China * Correspondence: yinxq@fio.org.cn Received: 30 July 2020; Accepted: 27 August 2020; Published: 30 August 2020 Abstract: To investigate the effect of wave-induced mixing on the upper ocean structure, especially under typhoon conditions, an ocean-wave coupled model is used in this study. Two physical processes, wave-induced turbulence mixing and wave transport flux residue, are introduced. We select tropical cyclone (TC) Nepartak in the Northwest Pacific ocean as a TC example. The results show that during the TC period, the wave-induced turbulence mixing effectively increases the cooling area and cooling amplitude of the sea surface temperature (SST). The wave transport flux residue plays a positive role in reproducing the distribution of the SST cooling area. From the intercomparisons among experiments, it is also found that the wave-induced turbulence mixing has an important effect on the formation of mixed layer depth (MLD).
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Circulation Models and Modeling
    2512-5 Fundamentals of Ocean Climate Modelling at Global and Regional Scales (Hyderabad - India) 5 - 14 August 2013 Ocean Circulation Models and Modeling GRIFFIES Stephen Princeton University U.S. Department of Commerce N.O.A.A., Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, 201 Forrestal Road, Forrestal Campus P.O. Box 308, 08542-6649 Princeton NJ U.S.A. 5.1: Ocean Circulation Models and Modeling Stephen.Griffi[email protected] NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton, USA [email protected] Laboratoire de Physique des Oceans,´ LPO Brest, France Draft from May 24, 2013 1 5.1.1. Scope of this chapter 2 We focus in this chapter on numerical models used to understand and predict large- 3 scale ocean circulation, such as the circulation comprising basin and global scales. It 4 is organized according to two themes, which we consider the “pillars” of numerical 5 oceanography. The first addresses physical and numerical topics forming a foundation 6 for ocean models. We focus here on the science of ocean models, in which we ask 7 questions about fundamental processes and develop the mathematical equations for 8 ocean thermo-hydrodynamics. We also touch upon various methods used to represent 9 the continuum ocean fluid with a discrete computer model, raising such topics as the 10 finite volume formulation of the ocean equations; the choice for vertical coordinate; 11 the complementary issues related to horizontal gridding; and the pervasive questions 12 of subgrid scale parameterizations. The second theme of this chapter concerns the 13 applications of ocean models, in particular how to design an experiment and how to 14 analyze results.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010)
    Complete bibliography of all items cited in A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010) Paul N. Edwards Caveat: this bibliography contains occasional typographical errors and incomplete citations. Abbate, Janet. Inventing the Internet. Inside Technology. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999. Abbe, Cleveland. “The Weather Map on the Polar Projection.” Monthly Weather Review 42, no. 1 (1914): 36-38. Abelson, P. H. “Scientific Communication.” Science 209, no. 4452 (1980): 60-62. Aber, John D. “Terrestrial Ecosystems.” In Climate System Modeling, edited by Kevin E. Trenberth, 173- 200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Ad Hoc Study Group on Carbon Dioxide and Climate. “Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment.” (1979): Air Force Data Control Unit. Machine Methods of Weather Statistics. New Orleans: Air Weather Service, 1948. Air Force Data Control Unit. Machine Methods of Weather Statistics. New Orleans: Air Weather Service, 1949. Alaka, MA, and RC Elvander. “Optimum Interpolation From Observations of Mixed Quality.” Monthly Weather Review 100, no. 8 (1972): 612-24. Edwards, A Vast Machine Bibliography 1 Alder, Ken. The Measure of All Things: The Seven-Year Odyssey and Hidden Error That Transformed the World. New York: Free Press, 2002. Allen, MR, and DJ Frame. “Call Off the Quest.” Science 318, no. 5850 (2007): 582. Alvarez, LW, W Alvarez, F Asaro, and HV Michel. “Extraterrestrial Cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinction.” Science 208, no. 4448 (1980): 1095-108. American Meteorological Society. 2000. Glossary of Meteorology. http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/ Anderson, E. C., and W. F. Libby. “World-Wide Distribution of Natural Radiocarbon.” Physical Review 81, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Harmful Algal Bloom Mapping System (Habmaps) and Bulletin
    Evaluation of the Harmful Algal Bloom Mapping System (HABMapS) and Bulletin Earth Science Applications Directorate Coastal Management Team John C. Stennis Space Center, Mississippi National Aeronautics and Space Administration John C. Stennis Space Center SSC, Mississippi 39529–6000 June 2004 Acknowledgments This work was directed by the NASA Earth Science Applications Directorate at the John C. Stennis Space Center, Mississippi. Participation in this work by Lockheed Martin Space Operations – Stennis Programs was supported under contract number NAS 13-650. Earth Science Applications Directorate Coastal Management Team John C. Stennis Space Center, Mississippi Leland Estep, Lockheed Martin Space Operations – Stennis Programs Gregory Terrie, Lockheed Martin Space Operations – Stennis Programs Eurico D'Sa, Lockheed Martin Space Operations – Stennis Programs Mary Pagnutti, Lockheed Martin Space Operations – Stennis Programs Callie Hall, NASA Earth Science Applications Directorate Vicki Zanoni, NASA Earth Science Applications Directorate The use of trademarks or names of manufacturers is for accurate reporting only and does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, of such products or manufacturers by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Earth Science Applications Directorate Coastal Management Team Table of Contents Executive Summary...................................................................................................................................... v 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (CCRUN) Phase II
    Supporting Regional Implementation of Integrated Climate Resilience Consortium for Climate Risk in the Urban Northeast (CCRUN) Phase II Research Highlights, September 1, 2015 – May 31, 2016 Boston New York City Philadelphia CCRUN’s Mission CCRUN conducts stakeholder-driven research that reduces climate- related vulnerability and advances opportunities for adaptation in the urban Northeast September 2015 – May 2016 | 1 The CCRUN Team Lead Investigators, Sectors, and Cross-Cutting Themes: Radley Horton (CU), Patrick Kinney (CU), Franco Montalto (Drexel), Richard Palmer (UMass), Philip Orton (Stevens), William Solecki (CUNY) Program Manager: Daniel Bader (CU) Investigators: Sandra Baptista (CU), Alan Blumberg (Stevens), Robert Chen (CU), Nickitas Georgas (Stevens), Vivien Gornitz (CU), Patrick Gurian (Drexel), Yochanan Kushnir (CU), Kytt MacManus (CU), Malgosia Madajewicz (CU) Research & Support Staff: Jim Carcone (CU), Annie Gerard (CU), Merlie Hansen (CU), Valentina Mara (CU), Reza Marsooli (Stevens), Dara Mendeloff (CU), Danielle Peters (CU), John Scialdone (CU), Justin Schulte (Stevens), Raquel Sousa (Drexel), David Strom (CU), Sri Vinay (CU), Ziwen Yu (Drexel) Graduate Students and Post-docs: Roham Bakhtyar (Stevens), Grace Cambareri (UMass), Ethan Coffel (CU), Leslie DeCristofaro (UMass), Erin Friedman (CUNY), Stephanie Miller (Drexel), Jennifer Nguyen (CU), Ashlinn Quinn (CU), Lauren Smalls-Mantey (Drexel), Kate Weinberger (CU), Sarah Whateley (UMass) Research Affiliates: Susana Adamo (CU), Mark Arend (CCNY), James Booth (CCNY), Arthur
    [Show full text]
  • Committee I.1: Environment 3
    18th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress (ISSC 2012) - W. Fricke, R. Bronsart (Eds.) c 2012 Schiffbautechnische Gesellschaft, Hamburg, ISBN 978-3-87700-131-f5,8g i Proceedings to be purchased at http://www.stg-online.org/publikationen.html i i i 18th INTERNATIONAL SHIP AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES CONGRESS 09-13 SEPTEMBER 2012 I S S C ROSTOCK, GERMANY 2 0 1 2 VOLUME 1 COMMITTEE I.1 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MANDATE Concern for descriptions of the ocean environment, especially with respect to wave, current and wind, in deep and shallow waters, and ice, as a basis for the determination of environmental loads for structural design. Attention shall be given to statistical description of these and other related phenomena relevant to the safe design and operation of ships and offshore structures. The committee is encouraged to cooperate with the corresponding ITTC committee. COMMITTEE MEMBERS Chairman: Elzbieta M. Bitner-Gregersen Subrata K. Bhattacharya Ioannis K. Chatjigeorgiou Ian Eames Kathrin Ellermann Kevin Ewans Greg Hermanski Michael C. Johnson Ning Ma Christophe Maisondieu Alexander Nilva Igor Rychlik Takuji Waseda KEYWORDS Environment, ocean, wind, wave, current, sea level, ice, deep water, shallow water, data source, modelling, climate change, data access, design condition, operational condition, uncertainty. 1 i i i i 18th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress (ISSC 2012) - W. Fricke, R. Bronsart (Eds.) c 2012 Schiffbautechnische Gesellschaft, Hamburg, ISBN 978-3-87700-131-f5,8g i Proceedings to be purchased at http://www.stg-online.org/publikationen.html i i i i i i i 18th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress (ISSC 2012) - W.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Circulation Studies and Modeling in Casco Bay Asa 2011-32
    REVIEW OF CIRCULATION STUDIES AND MODELING IN CASCO BAY ASA 2011-32 PREPARED FOR: Casco Bay Estuarine Partnership (CBEP) University of Southern Maine, Muskie School PO Box 9300 34 Bedford St 228B Wishcamper Center Portland, ME 04104-9300 PREPARED BY: Malcolm L. Spaulding Applied Science Associates 55 Village Square Drive South Kingstown, RI 02880 DATE SUBMITTED July 11, 2011 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Applied Science Associates (ASA) was contracted by the Casco Bay Estuary Partnership (CBEP) to prepare a report reviewing the state of knowledge of circulation in Casco Bay, discussing relevant hydrodynamic modeling approaches and supporting observation programs. A summary of the final report of this study (the present document) was presented at a two day, Casco Bay Circulation Modeling Workshop held on May 18-19, 2011 at the Eastland Park Hotel, Portland, Maine. At the conclusion of the workshop a brief consensus summary was prepared and provided in this report. The review identified four efforts focused on modeling the circulation of Casco Bay and the adjacent shelf waters. These included the following: Pearce et al (1996) application of the NOAA Model for Estuarine and Coastal Circulation Assessment (MECCA) model (Hess, 1998) (funded by CBEP); True and Manning’s (undated) application of the unstructured grid Finite Volume Coastal Ocean Model (FVCOM) model (Chen et al, 2003); McCay et al (2008) application of ASA’s Boundary Fitted Hydrodynamic Model (BFHYRDO), and Xue and Du(2010) application of the Princeton Ocean Model (POM) (Mellor, 2004). All models were applied in a three dimensional mode and featured higher resolution of the inner bay than of the adjacent shelf.
    [Show full text]
  • TR-2933 Street Scale Modeling of Storm Surge Inundation Along The
    TR-2933 Street Scale Modeling of Storm Surge Inundation along the New Jersey Hudson River Waterfront Alan Blumberg, Thomas Herrington, Larry Yin, and Nickitas Georgas Davidson Laboratory Technical Report TR-2933 Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, NJ October 2014 1 TR-2933 Executive Summary A new, high-resolution, hydrodynamic model that encompasses the urban coastal waters and coastal flood plain of New Jersey along the Hudson River waterfront opposite New York City has been developed and validated. 3.1m model grid resolution combined with high-resolution LiDAR elevation datasets permit a street by street focus to inundation modeling. The waterfront inundation model (NJWIM) is a sECOM model application, nested into a larger New York Bight sECOM model (NYHOPS), itself nested to an even larger Northwest Atlantic sECOM model (SNAP). Robust wetting and drying of land in the model physics provides for the dynamic prediction of flood elevations and velocities across land features during inundation events. NJWIM was forced by water levels from the NYHOPS hindcast of Hurricane Sandy. The hindcast utilized Sandy over ocean wind field and atmospheric pressure data, offshore wave and tidal boundary forcing, atmospheric heat fluxes, and interior streamflow data. Validation against 56 water marks and 16 edgemarks provided via the USGS and through an extensive crowd sourcing effort consisting of photographs, videos and personal stories shows that the model is capable of computing overland water elevations quite accurately. The correlation coefficient (R2) between the water mark observations and the model results is 0.92. The standard deviation of the residual error is 0.07 m. The simulated water levels at 78% of the data measurement locations have less than 20% error.
    [Show full text]
  • A Wetting and Drying Scheme for POM
    Ocean Modelling 9 (2005) 133–150 www.elsevier.com/locate/ocemod A wetting and drying scheme for POM Lie-Yauw Oey * Princeton University, AOS, Sayre Hall, Forrestal Campus, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Received 7 May 2004; received in revised form 10 May 2004; accepted 3 June 2004 Available online 2 July 2004 Abstract In shallow-water models, wetting and drying (WAD) are determined by the total water depth D ¼ 0 for ‘dry’ and >0 for ‘wet’. Checks are applied to decide the fate of each cell during model integration. It is shown that with bottom friction values commonly used in coastal models, the shallow-water system may be cast into a Burger’s type equation for D. For flows dominated by D (i.e. jrDjjrHj, where Hðx; yÞ defines topography) a non-linear diffusion equation results, with an effective diffusivity that varies like D2, so that ‘dry’ cells are regions where ‘diffusion’ is very small. In this case, the system admits D ¼ 0 as part of its continuous solution and no checks are necessary. For general topography, and/or in the case of strong momentum advection, ‘wave-breaking’ solution (i.e. hydraulic jumps and/or bores) can develop. A WAD scheme is proposed and applied to the Princeton Ocean Model (POM). The scheme defines ‘dry’ cells as regions with a thin film of fluid O (cm). The primitive equations are solved in the thin film as well as in other regular wet cells. The scheme requires only flux-blocking conditions across cells’ interfaces when wet cells become dry, while ‘dry’ cells are temporarily dormant and are dynamically activated through mass and momentum conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsunami Inundation Simulation at the Yaene Port, Hachijo Island Due to Hypothetical South Sea of Japan Tsunami 일본남해의 가상지진에 의한 야에네항의 지진해일 범람시뮬레이션
    한국해안․ 해양공학회 학술발표논문집 (2008) 2008년 9월 25일-9월 26일 제17권, pp. 88-91 Tsunami Inundation Simulation at the Yaene Port, Hachijo Island due to hypothetical South Sea of Japan Tsunami 일본남해의 가상지진에 의한 야에네항의 지진해일 범람시뮬레이션 Kyeong Ok Kim1, Tomoaki Komaguchi2, Takao Yamashita3 and Byung Ho Choi4 김경옥1, 駒口友章2, 山下隆男3, 최병호4 1. INTRODUCTION Earthquake. The return period is about 80 ~ 150 year, the theory of 200 year is exist also. The The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake was an expected earthqake is the maximum magnitude of undersea (subduction) earthquake that occurred on 8.7, and it will be one of the strongest earthqake. December 26, 2004, and damaged near the This research simulated the hypothetical tsunami epicenter of the west coast of Sumatra, Indonesia expected in the South Sea of Japan, and its focused and the opposite side of Indian Ocean. The moment inundation to the Yaene Port, Hachijo Island magniude is estimated Mw=9.3 and it is almost (Fig.3) using 2-D mode of Princeton Ocean Model same as the 1960s in Chile and Alaska. Such (Mellor, 2003). earthquake was not expected on the seismology. The tectonic setting from the west-north of Japan to Ryukyu trench is very similar with the tectonic setting of Sumatra to Andaman Islands. relatively slow subduction is proceeded and a major slip fault is developed on islands in this region. And the half area has a back-arc basin with expanding axis. These affinity is not the evidence to cause similar massive earthquake, and the gigantic earthquake could not occur by the characteristic of these area in the traditional point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • Disruptive Climate, Disruptive Technologies
    EBC and Sustainable Solutions Lab at UMass Boston Climate Adaptation Forum Disruptive Climate, Disruptive Technologies Friday, June 7, 2019 University of Massachusetts Club | Boston Save the Date! September 20, 2019 Climate Adaptation Forum: Public Health EBC & Sustainable Solutions Lab at UMass Boston – Quarterly Climate Adaptation Forum EBC Contact: Jackson Bailey, [email protected] | SSL Contact: Rebecca Herst, [email protected] www.climateadaptationforum.org AGENDA 8:00 a.m. Welcome • David Cash, Ph.D., Forum Organizer Dean, John W. McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies University of Massachusetts Boston 8:05 a.m. Forum Introduction & Overview • Kelly Knee, Forum Co-Chair Executive Director – Ocean Science, RPS Group 8:10 a.m. Lightning Round of Disruptive Technologies Biobot • Mariana Matus, Co-Founder & CEO, Biobot Emerald Tutu • Gabriel Cira, Architect, Very Flat • Nicholas Lutsko, Postdoctoral Associate, MIT Green Stream Technologies • Karen Lindquist, Chief Operating Officer, Green Stream Technologies ISeeChange • Julia Kumari Drapkin, CEO and Founder, ISeeChange Risk Map • Mayank Ojha, Research Associate, Urban Risk Lab, MIT Upstream Tech • Marshall Moutenot, Managing Director, Upstream Tech WAVE of Change • Valentina Sumini, Postdoctoral Associate, MIT MediaLab • Alpha Yacob, Ph.D. Candidate, MIT 9:00 a.m. Keynote Presentation: Building a Resilient Tomorrow: Will Tech Get Us There? • Alice Hill, Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University 9:30 a.m. Networking Break 10:00 a.m. Rhode Island’s Coastal Hazard Application Viewer • Teresa Crean, Coastal Research Associate Community Planning and Coastal Resilience University of Rhode Island Coastal Resources Center 10:05 a.m. Scenario Base Permitting and the Use of the Environmental Risk Index • Grover Fugate, Executive Director Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council 10:20 a.m.
    [Show full text]