DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MAY 9, 2005 No. 59 House of Representatives The House met at noon and was PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1886. A letter from the Principal Deputy called to order by the Speaker pro tem- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Associate Administrator, Environmental pore (Mr. WOLF). Protection Agency, transmitting the Agen- Chair will lead the House in the Pledge cy’s final rule — Bacillus thuringiensis f of Allegiance. VIP3A Protein and the Genetic Material DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER The SPEAKER pro tempore led the Necessary for its Production; Temporary Ex- PRO TEMPORE Pledge of Allegiance as follows: emption From the Requirement of a Toler- I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the ance [OPP-2005-0083; FRL-7706-7] received The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- United States of America, and to the Repub- April 27, 2005, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. fore the House the following commu- lic for which it stands, one nation under God, 801(a)(1)(A); to the Committee on Agri- nication from the Speaker: indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. culture. 1887. A letter from the Principal Deputy WASHINGTON, DC, f May 9, 2005. Associate Administrator, Environmental I hereby appoint the Honorable FRANK R. APPOINTMENT AS MEMBERS TO Protection Agency, transmitting the Agen- WOLF to act as Speaker pro tempore on this THE HELPING TO ENHANCE THE cy’s final rule — Trifluralin; Pesticide Toler- day. LIVELIHOOD OF PEOPLE (HELP) ance [OPP-2004-0142; FRL-7710-9] received April 27, 2005, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. J. DENNIS HASTERT, AROUND THE GLOBE COMMIS- Speaker of the House of Representatives. 801(a)(1)(A); to the Committee on Agri- SION culture. f The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- 1888. A letter from the Principal Deputy PRAYER Associate Administrator, Environmental ant to section 637(d)(1) of the HELP Protection Agency, transmitting the Agen- The Reverend Dr. Barry C. Black, Commission Act (22 U.S.C. 2394b) and cy’s final rule — Approval and Promulgation Chaplain, United States Senate, offered the order of the House of January 4, of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; the following prayer: 2005, the Chair announces that on Fri- Low Emission Vehicle Program [R01-OAR- O God, who redeems our lives and day, May 6, 2005, the Speaker appointed 2004-ME-0004; A-1-FRL-7900-6] received April snatches us from the power of death, the following members on the part of 27, 2005, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); to the House to the Helping to Enhance the Committee on Energy and Commerce. help us to see that in spite of our best 1889. A letter from the Principal Deputy plans for today, Your purposes will pre- the Livelihood of People (HELP) Associate Administrator, Environmental vail. Teach us to submit to Your Around the Globe Commission: Protection Agency, transmitting the Agen- unstoppable providence, knowing that Mr. Robert H. Michel, Washington, cy’s final rule — Approval and Promulgation You desire to prosper us and give us D.C; of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Mary- success. Remind us that when we help Mrs. Jennifer Dunn, Virginia; land; Clarification of Visible Emissions Ex- those on life’s margins, we lend to You. Mr. William C. Lane, Virginia; ception Provisions [RME-OAR-2005-MD-0002; Mr. Nicholas Eberstadt, Virginia. FRL-7904-2] received April 27, 2005, pursuant Accompany the Members of the f to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); to the Committee on House of Representatives today in Energy and Commerce. their challenging work. Give them the ADJOURNMENT 1890. A letter from the Principal Deputy security of Your spirit as You protect The SPEAKER pro tempore. Without Associate Administrator, Environmental them from harm. Shine the warmth of objection, the House stands adjourned Protection Agency, transmitting the Agen- cy’s final rule — Approval and Promulgation Your presence upon them during their until 12:30 p.m. tomorrow for morning moments of uncertainty. Lord, answer of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Vir- hour debates. ginia; Revision Establishing the Western them from Your holy heaven and res- There was no objection. Virginia VOC and NOX Emissions Control cue them by Your great might. Accordingly (at 12 o’clock and 3 min- Area, and Providing the Enabling Authority We pray this in Your powerful name. utes p.m.), under its previous order, the for NOX RACT Determination in the Area Amen. House adjourned until tomorrow, Tues- [R03-OAR-2005-VA-0002; FRL-7904-9] received f day, May 10, 2005, at 12:30 p.m., for April 27, 2005, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. morning hour debates. 801(a)(1)(A); to the Committee on Energy and THE JOURNAL Commerce. f The SPEAKER pro tempore. The 1891. A letter from the Principal Deputy Chair has examined the Journal of the EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATIONS, Associate Administrator, Environmental ETC. Protection Agency, transmitting the Agen- last day’s proceedings and announces cy’s final rule — Approval and Promulgation to the House his approval thereof. Under clause 8 of rule XII, executive of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Vir- Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- communications were taken from the ginia; Minor Revisions to the Fugitive Dust nal stands approved. Speaker’s table and referred as follows: and Waiver Requirements [R03-OAR-2005-VA- b This symbol represents the time of day during the House proceedings, e.g., b 1407 is 2:07 p.m. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor. H3059 . VerDate Aug 04 2004 23:42 May 09, 2005 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A09MY7.000 H09PT1 H3060 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE May 9, 2005 0003; FRL-7905-9] received April 27, 2005, pur- 1901. A letter from the Presidential Ap- [The following action occurred on May 6, 2005] suant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); to the Com- pointments Officer, Department of State, H.R. 742. Referral to the Committee on the mittee on Energy and Commerce. transmitting a report pursuant to the Fed- Judiciary extended for a period ending not 1892. A letter from the Principal Deputy eral Vacancies Reform Act of 1998; to the later than May 20, 2005. Associate Administrator, Environmental Committee on Government Reform. Protection Agency, transmitting the Agen- 1902. A letter from the Presidential Ap- cy’s final rule — Approval and Promulgation pointments Officer, Department of State, f of Implementation Plans; Wallula, Wash- transmitting a report pursuant to the Fed- ington PM10 Nonattainment Area; Serious eral Vacancies Reform Act of 1998; to the PUBLIC BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS Area Plan for Attainment of the Annual and Committee on Government Reform. 24-Hour PM10 Standards [R10-OAR-2004-WA- 1903. A letter from the Presidential Ap- Under clause 2 of rule XII, 0001; FRL-7094-7] received April 27, 2005, pur- pointments Officer, Department of State, Mr. PICKERING introduced a bill (H.R. suant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); to the Com- transmitting a report pursuant to the Fed- 2206) to amend the Public Health Service Act mittee on Energy and Commerce. eral Vacancies Reform Act of 1998; to the to establish a competitive grant program to 1893. A letter from the Principal Deputy Committee on Government Reform. build capacity in veterinary medical edu- Associate Administrator, Environmental 1904. A letter from the General Counsel, Of- cation and expand the workforce of veteri- Protection Agency, transmitting the Agen- fice of Management and Budget, transmit- narians engaged in public health practice cy’s final rule — Approval and Promulgation ting a report pursuant to the Federal Vacan- and biomedical research; which was referred of Implementation Plan; Wisconsin [R05- cies Reform Act of 1998; to the Committee on to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. OAR-2004-WI-0001; FRL-7901-2] received April Government Reform. 27, 2005, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); to 1905. A letter from the Chief Justice, Su- the Committee on Energy and Commerce. preme Court of the United States, transmit- f 1894. A letter from the Principal Deputy ting amendments to the Federal Rules of Associate Administrator, Environmental Criminal Procedure that have been adopted ADDITIONAL SPONSORS TO PUBLIC by the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2072; (H. Protection Agency, transmitting the Agen- BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS cy’s final rule — Approval and Promulgation Doc. No. 109–22); to the Committee on the Ju- of Plan for the Control of Designated Pollut- diciary and ordered to be printed. Under clause 7 of rule XII, sponsors ants; Maine; Total Reduced Sulfur From Ex- 1906. A letter from the Chief Justice, Su- were added to public bills and resolu- isting Kraft Pulp Mills [R01-OAR-2004-ME- preme Court of the United States, transmit- tions as follows: 0002; A-1-FRL-7903-9] received April 27, 2005, ting amendments to the Federal Rules of pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); to the Com- Civil Procedure that have been adopted by H.R. 47: Mr. SODREL, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. mittee on Energy and Commerce. the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2072; (H. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, 1895. A letter from the Principal Deputy Doc. No. 109–23); to the Committee on the Ju- and Mr. MCINTYRE. Associate Administrator, Environmental diciary and ordered to be printed. H.R. 98: Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Third Branch Conference
    THIRD BRANCH CONFERENCE June 13, 2006 The Honorable Ted Stevens The Honorable William H. Frist, M.D. The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Rick Santorum The Honorable Jon Kyl The Honorable Kay Bailey Hutchison The Honorable Elizabeth Dole and copied to all Majority Senators. United States Senate U.S. Capitol Washington, DC Re: Stewarding the Third Branch Dear Senators: As the representatives of millions of Americans who support you in elections, we write to ask you to devote more effort on and off the Senate floor to confirming the President’s circuit court nominees. We write to remind you of your duty, but also because we are concerned that if the Majority that assured the confirmation votes of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito lose just one seat in the next election, the future of the Supreme Court and the federal appellate bench will again be imperiled by use of filibusters. We write because we fear that the Majority is ignoring the impact of the nominations debate on its ability to gain the support of those small margins of voters that the Majority needs to secure unobstructed confirmations. By contrast, and for example, you are planning to devote valuable Senate floor time to debating a flag-desecration constitutional amendment. While most of us would support such an amendment, we believe this is a misguided use of time. In a survey, 150 conservative opinion and grassroot organization leaders, all with nationally or state recognized names, were asked to rate the flag-burning amendment as a priority before November on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being high in importance and 1 being low.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 154 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 No. 152 Senate (Legislative day of Wednesday, September 17, 2008) The Senate met at 9:30 a.m., on the U.S. SENATE, Treasury and the Chairman of the Fed expiration of the recess, and was called PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, will be over in the House around 2 to order by the Honorable BENJAMIN L. Washington, DC, September 24, 2008. o’clock this afternoon. Democrats are To the Senate: CARDIN, a Senator from the State of holding a caucus at 4:30 p.m. to talk Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, Maryland. of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby about this issue. The Secretary is com- appoint the Honorable BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, ing to that caucus at 5 o’clock. PRAYER a Senator from the State of Maryland, to I hope we can make more progress. The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- perform the duties of the Chair. We have not only the Jewish holidays fered the following prayer: ROBERT C. BYRD, coming up next week, but a very im- Let us pray. President pro tempore. portant event is this Friday. I was told Gracious, loving God, let Your light, Mr. CARDIN thereupon assumed the and heard on the radio this morning Your wisdom, Your righteousness, and chair as Acting President pro tempore. that as much as 85 percent of the Your love fill our minds and hearts f American people will watch the debate this Friday.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE, Vol. 151, Pt. 8 May 24, 2005 and So out Into the Road the Three the Two Older Villains Did As They Had Mr
    May 24, 2005 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE, Vol. 151, Pt. 8 10929 Leahy Obama Snowe state, to calm the dangerous seas vice, but here it is. And by considering Lieberman Pryor Specter Lott Reid Stevens which, from time to time, threaten to that advice, it only stands to reason Lugar Roberts Sununu dash our Republic against rocky shoals that any President will be more as- Martinez Rockefeller Talent and jagged shores. sured that his nominees will enjoy a McCain Salazar Thomas The Senate proved it to be true again kinder reception in the Senate. McConnell Santorum Thune Mikulski Schumer Vitter yesterday, when 14 Members—from The agreement, which references the Murkowski Sessions Voinovich both sides of the aisle, Republicans and need for ‘‘advice and consent,’’ as con- Nelson (FL) Shelby Warner Democrats; 14 Members—of this re- tained in the Constitution, proves once Nelson (NE) Smith (OR) Wyden vered institution came together to again, as has been true for over 200 NAYS—18 avert the disaster referred to as the years, that our revered Constitution is Biden Dorgan Levin ‘‘nuclear option’’ or the ‘‘constitu- not simply a dry piece of parchment. It Boxer Feingold Lincoln tional option’’—these men and women is a living document. Cantwell Jeffords Murray of great courage. Yesterday’s agreement was a real-life Corzine Kennedy Reed illustration of how this historical docu- Dayton Kerry Sarbanes As William Gladstone said, in refer- Dodd Lautenberg Stabenow ring to the Senate of the United ment continues to be vital in our daily lives. It inspires, it teaches, and yester- NOT VOTING—1 States, the Senate is that remarkable body, the most remarkable day it helped the country and the Sen- Inouye of all the inventions of modern politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 150 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JULY 22, 2004 No. 103 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was APPOINTMENT OF ACTING vote on Richard Griffin and then David called to order by the Honorable SAXBY PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE McKeague. Therefore, Senators can ex- CHAMBLISS, a Senator from the State of The PRESIDING OFFICER. The pect the first votes of the day around Georgia. clerk will please read a communication 11 o’clock this morning. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Today’s to the Senate from the President pro Also we will turn to consideration of prayer will be offered by our guest tempore (Mr. STEVENS). the defense appropriations conference Chaplain, Pastor Gene Arey, New Har- The legislative clerk read the fol- report when it arrives from the House. vest Worship Center, Waynesboro, VA. lowing letter: We will be monitoring their action on that bill so that we can determine U.S. SENATE, PRAYER PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, when we may begin debate on that bill The guest Chaplain offered the fol- Washington, DC, July 22, 2004. this afternoon. lowing prayer: To the Senate: I don’t believe there is a need for a Let us pray. Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, great deal of debate on the defense of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby Father God, I come to You today on measure; however, we will confer with appoint the Honorable SAXBY CHAMBLISS, a the Democratic leadership on a time behalf of the Senators of the United Senator from the State of Georgia, to per- States of America and the people they agreement for this afternoon.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDERSTANDING the BLUE SLIP DEBATE 1 Hearings for Circuit Court Nominees Despite the Objections of Nees
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE BLUE SLIP The blue slip is an uncodified Senate tradition. As such, vari- ous chairs of the Senate Judiciary Committee have treated their influence differently. According to the Congressional Research Service: “From the 65th through the 84th Con- gresses, no chair of the Judiciary Committee allowed any negative blue slips to automatically veto a nomination.”2 The policy changed, though, when Sen. James Eastland (D-Miss.) became chair of the committee in 1956. During his tenure from 1956 to 1978, a nominee needed a positive blue slip from each of his or her home-state senators before advanc- ing through the committee.3 The policy changed again under Sen. Edward Kennedy’s (D-Mass.) tenure as chair from 1979 to 1981. Under Sen. Ken- nedy, an unreturned (or even negative) blue slip would not necessarily end a nomination. Chairman Sen. Strom Thur- mond (R-S.C.) followed a similarly lenient policy in practice from 1981 to 1987, as did Chairman Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) 4 R STREET SHORTS NO. 68 from 1987 to 1995. March 2019 In 2001, then-Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) returned to Sen. Eastland’s threshold, requiring two positive blue slips for a nominee to advance through the committee.5 But dur- ing Sen. Orrin Hatch’s second tenure as chair in 2001, and in UNDERSTANDING THE his third tenure from 2003 to 2005, he returned to the policy used previously by both he and Sen. Biden, not allowing the BLUE SLIP DEBATE lack of two positive blue slips to automatically veto a nomi- nation.6 And then from 2005 to 2007, Chairman Arlen Spec- Anthony Marcum ter (R-Pa.) followed Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Blue Slip in the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 1917-Present
    Order Code RL32013 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The History of the Blue Slip in the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 1917-Present Updated October 22, 2003 Mitchel A. Sollenberger Analyst in American National Government Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress The History of the Blue Slip in the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 1917-Present Summary The blue-slip process had its genesis in the Senate tradition of senatorial courtesy. Under this informal custom, the Senate would refuse to confirm a nomination unless the nominee had been approved by the home-state Senators of the President’s party. The Senate Committee on the Judiciary created the blue slip (so called because of its color) out of this practice in the early 1900s. Initially, the blue slip permitted Senators, regardless of party affiliation, to voice their opinion on a President’s nomination to a district court in their state or to a circuit court judgeship traditionally appointed from their home state. Over the years, the blue slip has evolved into a tool used by Senators to delay, and often times prevent, the confirmation of nominees they find objectionable. The following six periods highlight the major changes that various chairmen of the Judiciary Committee undertook in their blue-slip policy: ! From 1917 through 1955: The blue-slip policy allowed home-state Senators to state their objections but committee action to move forward on a nomination. If a Senator objected to his/her home-state nominee, the committee would report the nominee adversely to the Senate, where the contesting Senator would have the option of stating his/her objections to the nominee before the Senate would vote on confirmation.
    [Show full text]
  • Kavanaugh Part 2
    Dinh, Viet From: Dinh, Viet Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:52 PM To: Willett, Don; Koebele, Steve; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: Enron/Owen Options Heather and Matt: Thoughts? Feinstein told Hutcheson that she has a problem with Owen not returning Enron contributions, an(b) (5) -----Original Message----- From: Willett, Don Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:56 AM To: Koebele, Steve; Dinh, Viet Subject: RE: Enron/Owen Options (b) (5) -----Original Message----- From: Koebele, Steve Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 9:33 AM To: Dinh, Viet Cc: Willett, Don Subject: Enron/Owen Options Viet, for your discussions today, please consider the following options ... (b) (5) Suggestion: (b) (5) Options: 1 2(b) (5) 007104-002458 Document ID: 0.7.19343.7387 3 Viet, I again recommen 007104-002459 Document ID: 0.7.19343.7387 Dinh, Viet From: Dinh,Viet Sent: Wednesday,March20,200212:14PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: VRADraftViewsletter Attachments: VRAviewsletter--final.wpd 007104-002460 Document ID: 0.7.19343.7300 Koebele, Steve From: Koebele, Steve Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:39 PM To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Cc: McMahon, Lori; Goodling, Monica; Willett, Don; Dinh, Viet; O'Brien, Pat; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; (b)(6) Jennifer Oschal Email Dinh, Viet; Newstead, Jennifer; Keefer, WendyJ Subject: Owen Attachments Attachments: Biography-Owen.wpd; Campaign Fin-Enron 03-01-02.wpd All --Attached for your use are two documents related to Justice Owen: (1) a Biography that showcases her strong background;and (2) responsive talking points on the Enron case opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Advise & Consent
    The Los Angeles County Bar Association Appellate Courts Section Presents Advise & Consent: A Primer to the Federal Judicial Appointment Process Wednesday, October 28, 2020 Program - 12:00 - 1:30 PM Zoom Webinar CLE Credit: 1.5 Hours Credit (including Appellate Courts Specialization) Provider #36 The Los Angeles County Bar Association is a State Bar of California approved MCLE provider. The Los Angles County Bar Association certifies that this activity has been approved for MCLE credit by the State Bar of California. PANELIST BIOS Judge Kenneth Lee (Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) Kenneth Kiyul Lee is a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Senate confirmed him on May 15, 2019, making him the nation’s first Article III judge born in the Republic of Korea. Prior to his appointment, Judge Lee was a partner at the law firm of Jenner & Block in Los Angeles, where he handled a wide variety of complex litigation matters and had a robust pro bono practice. Judge Lee previously served as an Associate Counsel to President George W. Bush and as Special Counsel to Senator Arlen Specter, then-chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He started his legal career as an associate at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz in New York. Judge Lee is a 2000 magna cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School and a 1997 summa cum laude graduate of Cornell University. He clerked for Judge Emilio M. Garza of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from 2000 to 2001. Judge Leslie Southwick (Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals) Leslie Southwick was appointed to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE—Tuesday, May 24, 2005
    May 24, 2005 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE, Vol. 151, Pt. 8 10915 SENATE—Tuesday, May 24, 2005 The Senate met at 9:45 a.m. and was RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY what the Democratic leader or I asked called to order by the Honorable LISA LEADER for—it is important that we see how it MURKOWSKI, a Senator from the State The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- is going to be implemented, and the of Alaska. pore. The majority leader is recog- first step will be that vote today. nized. We do have a lot to do this week. I PRAYER want to keep things organized effi- f The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- ciently and well and use time wisely. fered the following prayer: SCHEDULE Mr. REID. Madam President, if I could direct another question to the Let us pray. Mr. FRIST. Madam President, this distinguished leader, it was my under- Eternal spirit, You have said that the morning we will continue debate in ex- standing of our conversation late last truth will set us free. We thank You ecutive session on the nomination of night that we were not going to move that Your freedom leads to harmony Priscilla Owen to be a U.S. Circuit forward on more judges this period but and not discord, to consensus and not judge for the Fifth Circuit, and today move forward to other matters. Do you conflict. Liberate us from deceptions at noon we will have a cloture vote now feel differently? and distortions that caricature reality with respect to the Owen nomination.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S8585
    July 22, 2004 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S8585 I hope the Commission’s report is a call. We do not want to be in the ‘‘what This President—regretfully, in many clarion call. Let’s get our act together. if’’ situation. God forbid there is an- instances—has not consulted the Sen- Again, this is not a partisan issue. This other terrorist attack and the next ate. The two Senators from Michigan— should not instigate fighting with one morning we say: What if? What if we they happen to be of a different party another. We should just do it. had done the job? What if the attack than the President but we know they I wish the White House in their budg- was by shoulder-held missiles? And we enjoy working with the other party— ets had allocated more money. When say: What if we had done the job. What were not consulted. I know it can be people in the Senate, both Democrat if the attack was from ships and ports? done. We have done it in my State of and Republican, said, We need to do We say: What if we had done the job on New York. We don’t have a single va- this, that, and the other, had the Presi- port security or on the rails? Or be- cancy in either the district courts or dent said, Yes, sir, right on—but we do cause someone got across our borders the Second Circuit because finally, not have that. We do not have leader- and shouldn’t have? We do not want to after I said I was not going to allow ship on homeland security.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S8516
    S8516 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE July 21, 2004 in absolute terms or relative to the domestic the date that is 10 years after the date on court and why we have had a problem market for that article, and under such con- which duties on the article are eliminated in getting this far with his nomination ditions as to cause serious damage, or actual pursuant to the Agreement. but why I hope our colleagues will be threat thereof, to a domestic industry pro- SEC. 327. COMPENSATION AUTHORITY. willing to vote to confirm him. ducing an article that is like, or directly For purposes of section 123 of the Trade competitive with, the imported article. As the Chair noted, he is a nominee Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2133), any import relief to the U.S. Circuit Court for the Sixth (2) SERIOUS DAMAGE.—In making a deter- provided by the President under this subtitle mination under paragraph (1), the Presi- shall be treated as action taken under chap- Circuit. He was nominated, and I ask dent— ter 1 of title II of such Act. my colleagues to think of this date for (A) shall examine the effect of increased SEC. 328. BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMA- a moment, on November 8, 2001. It is imports on the domestic industry, as re- TION. now 2004. He is a distinguished State flected in changes in such relevant economic The President may not release information court of appeals judge from the State factors as output, productivity, utilization of which is submitted in a proceeding under of Michigan with nearly a decade of ex- capacity, inventories, market share, exports, this subtitle and which the President con- wages, employment, domestic prices, profits, perience in that court.
    [Show full text]
  • The Majoritarian Filibuster
    BENJAMIN EIDELSON The Majoritarian Filibuster ABSTR ACT. The debate over the Senate filibuster revolves around its apparent conflict with the principle of majority rule. Because narrow Senate majorities often represent only a minority of Americans, however, many filibusters are not at odds with majority rule at all. By paying attention to such "majoritarian filibusters," this Note aims to disrupt the terms of the traditional debate and open up a new space for potential compromise. This Note reports the first empirical study of the majoritarian or countermajoritarian character of recent filibusters. These data reveal that, in half of the Congresses over the past two decades, successful filibustering minorities usually represented more people than the majorities they defeated. The choice whether to preserve the filibuster therefore cannot be reduced to a simple choice between majority rule and minority rights. After exploring the distribution of majoritarian and countermajoritarian filibusters along other dimensions of interest, this Note proposes that the majority-rule principle might be better served by simply reducing the sixty-vote cloture threshold- thereby shifting the balance toward majoritarian as opposed to countermajoritarian filibusters - than by abolishing the filibuster altogether. AUTHO R. Yale Law School, J.D. 2014; University of Oxford, D.Phil. 2o11; Yale College, B.A. 2008. Thanks to Sandy Levinson, Akhil Amar, Ben Grunwald, and the editors of The Yale Law Journalfor helpful conversations and advice. 980 NOTE CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 982 1. THE FILIBUSTER AND THE FILIBUSTER DEBATE 987 A. The Filibuster and the Cloture Rule 987 B. Internal and External Majoritarianism 990 II. QUANTIFYING THE FILIBUSTER'S EFFECT ON MAJORITY RULE 995 A.
    [Show full text]