Nuriaty, the Saint and the Sultan: Virtuous Subject and Subjective Virtuoso of the Post- Modern Colony Author(s): Michael Lambek Reviewed work(s): Source: Anthropology Today, Vol. 16, No. 2 (Apr., 2000), pp. 7-12 Published by: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2678234 . Accessed: 30/01/2012 09:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Anthropology Today. http://www.jstor.org Rouyer,Alwin R. 1994. least treated that caste leaders and local The between official ExplainingEconomie way by people (1955). opposition rigid knowledge Backwardnessand Weak who pressure the backward classes commissions to recog- and fluid practical knowledge that Scott dwells on, and in GoverningCapability nize their claims.9 Moreover, individuals or households that is also popular in constructivist writing on social and BiharState in India.South can cross class boundaries their social economic cultural stems from the same Asia,17 (2):63-89. (when group divisions, metaphys- Scott,James C. 1998.Seeing situation changes) and thus move in and out of eligible cat- ical pathos of bureaucracy.