DOCSLIB.ORG

Crossrail 2 Factsheet: Angel Station Crossrail 2 Factsheet: Victoria Station

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crossrail 2 Factsheet: Angel Station Crossrail 2 Factsheet: Victoria Station Crossrail 2 factsheet: Angel station Crossrail 2 factsheet: Victoria station Crossrail 2 is a proposed new railway line serving London and the South East, linking Surrey to Hertfordshire via Central London destinations. A new Crossrail 2 station is proposed at Angel. The earliest the scheme could be open by is 2030. Why do we need Crossrail 2? Angel is a thriving local centre and is currently served only • Provide step-free access from street level to the by the Northern line - one of London’s busiest Tube lines. Crossrail 2 platforms With congestion on the transport network set to increase in future, we need Crossrail 2 to ensure that people can • Add station capacity allowing up to 11,000 more continue to get to and from Angel easily. passengers to use the station in the peak hours • Provide local people with access to more jobs within What are the benefits of Crossrail 2? a 45 minute commute Crossrail 2 would add capacity to existing rail services and support economic regeneration by providing the • Support local businesses and economic growth by infrastructure needed to build new homes and create enabling more people to get to Angel within a 45 minute more jobs across London and beyond. journey. This would significantly increase the workforce available to local businesses, boosting their chances of A Crossrail 2 station at Angel would: finding and retaining a valued workforce • Improve your journey with up to 30 Crossrail 2 trains per • Reduce the time taken to travel to Angel, for example hour to destinations in London, Hertfordshire and Surrey a journey to Clapham Junction would be reduced by approximately 15 minutes • Reduce crowding on the busiest part of the Northern line during peak periods by approximately 10 per cent • Connect with existing London Underground services 10% Trains per hour Reduction in crowding through the tunnelled section on existing services All figures are based on current working assumptions and are subject to change. S6 D O V E S Y A R Adventure Games D Court ROW Playground 17 19 8 1 War Memorial COLEBROOKE 59 Hilton 60 CLOUDESLEY STREET 7 35 BARFORD STREET 105 Islington CRUDEN STREET 1 1 1 Church ELYSTAN 26 7 59 68 WALK Islington 1 on the 1 2 95 32 Corner 36 30 30 Green Key 7 34 CAMDEN 84 COPENHAGEN STREET 1 The proposal Statue WALK Proposed29 worksites 6 62 Business 16 39 40 25 S CHARLOTTE TERRACE 7 Design Centre T. 21 A new Crossrail 2 station at Angel would be underground Please refer to G6: A Typical Crossrail 2 Station to find out 69 P CLOUDESLEY PLACE E 23 56 T Crossrail 2 underground13 tunnels E 23 53 R and could include: more about the proposed design features of our below 21 52 ’ S S T R O A D R ground stations. Crossrail 2 platforms E 34 E R S E 1 B E R N T Vittoria CLOUDESLEY ROAD • 2x250 metre long platforms. Station platform tunnels 66 24 2 49 341 17 LIVERPOOL ROAD Housing Primary School 16 6 7 9 T Key local buildings BATCHELOR STREET 29 around 30 metres below ground level to the top of 14 Aid Centre 12 HALF 27 18 tunnel Minimising our impact MOON E 7 2 43 BROMFIELD STREET 10 CHARLTON PLACE CRESCENT14 Crossrail 2 station entrances 22 2 E 348 60 25 15 COURT 7 Premier Inn Japanese SHALFORD Drawing on Crossrail 1’s experience of building stations, CAMDEN 57 PASSAGE • An increase in capacity within the existing Northern line DENMARK GROVE R Gallery 11 27 the proposed Crossrail 2 station at Angel is estimated to Existing station entrancesDIGNUM STREET 10 11 353 T 50 ticket hall to accommodate a Crossrail 2 ticket hall on RITCHIE STREET 36 33 DEVONIA ROAD take five to eight years to complete. Activity on site would 2 PARKFIELD STREET T S E 49 Islington High Street Station shaft 6 E 18 Camden 34 29 fluctuate during this period. 16 R COLEBROOKE ROW MAYGOOD STREET GATEWAY T 20 ARCADE S D E W E Y R O A D 2 TOLPUDDLE STREET H Passage Northern line R G • An enlarged station entrance and a new second I H GRANTBRIDGE STREET Proposals for the scheme are still at the early stages of 14 E St. John entrance onto Torrens Street Victoria line N 49 1 BARNSBURY ROAD O E T 359 Evangelist design. Feedback from this and future consultations, T R E 93 T Church of E S P G 31 L Catholic 41 U D D Sainsbury’s N P I St. John 1 together with further design and engineering work, will L L T T O 1 40 2 • An underground connection between Crossrail 2 and P S Primary GERRARD ROAD E WYNFORD ROAD I E ECKFORD STREET the Evangelist refine the proposals ahead of seeking permission to build School 34 R 84 T Northern line services 72 U 1 33 S Waitrose the new railway. Y CHAPEL 28 21 Chapel PLACE R C O N D U I T S T 13 1 U WHITE D B STREETGRANT U 34 • A facility for reversing Crossrail 2 trains N N Market C A 27 All our contractors would have to adhere to a Code of N A 32 S 23 T D R 19 25 46 E E Construction Practice which would be developed with T DUNCAN TERRACE N O E L R O A D To construct Crossrail 2 we would require two main PENTON STREET 1 6 local authorities. This would set out requirements for 58 St. Silas 1 Islington Canal 55 worksites and two additional sites. 76 1 32 7 77 B CHAPEL MARKET35 Marks & considerate construction practices that use the latest Pentonville A A Tunnel R Spencer techniques to reduce noise and disruption both for 13 O Royal Bank N B Site A – The site of the Royal Bank of Scotland building BRADLEY FROG LANE RISINGHILL STREET CLOSE S 22 Federation of Scotland BRIDGE surface and underground works. T would be used for station tunnelling works and construction R 19 Embassy of Elizabeth E of Irish Duncan Terrace E 44 the State of 40 of the station entrance, station box and station shaft. T Garrett Societies95 101 VINCENT TERRACE 27 Gardens 1 As part of our Environmental Statement, a full evaluation 73 19 Anderson 72 Eritrea WHITE LION STREET 16 of the potential impacts of construction and operation of 17 139 College 9 23 Diespeker 32 Site B – Includes Iceland and other properties to the 25 1 29 PENTON GROVE Wharf the scheme would be documented along with proposed Claremont 13 1 north of White Lion Street. This site would be used for WHITE LION STREET 18 BARON STREET methods to minimise impacts where required. These Project Angel 2 Angel 1 36 30 53 7 construction of the station shaft. Impacts on Chapel Claremont 6 market would be avoided. proposals would then form commitments as part of the White Lion United Reformed application for planning consent. DONEGAL STREET D Youth Project Church DUNCAN TERRACE ISLINGTON COLEBROOKE ROW HIGH STREET Co-Operative QUICK STREET ANGEL Site C – At the southern part of Torrens Street, the MEWS 15 Pentonville DoubleTree Crafts Council Bank 16 ELIA STREET CYNTHIA STREET 1 1 16 location of the old entrance to Angel station would 25 by Hilton 26 ROCLIFFE STREET TORRENS STREET 17 10 C SUDELEY STREET 14 be used as access to support the construction of the 54 2 23 3 HERMES ANGEL underground connection between Crossrail 2 and the STREET 391 E L I A M E W S 32 1 24 A D 428 1 Northern line. L E R O 353 I L 75 V CLAREMONT SQUARE 389 128 44 120 O N Site D – The Public Carriage Office site, which is owned E N T C I T Y R O A D 1 P Old Red 1 BOREAS WALK E 17 C 16 by Transport for London, could be used for construction CLAREMONT SQUARE 398 29 L A Lion Theatre 1 P © Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100035971/043 L S O N N E REMINGTON STREET of a facility for reversing Crossrail 2 trains at Angel. This is © Copyright Transport for London 2015 333 26 subject to further investigation. 2 Claremont 5 O Square A K S LE 319 Y 33 364 NELSON TERRACE C 394 T OWEN STREET Goswell R 401 MYLNE STREET E Proposed Crossrail 2 stations CLAREMONT CL Owens 338 S 31 2 . 6 39 Fields GOSWELLRoad ROAD 1 B E V I N WAY CLAREMONT SQUARE 390 SIDNEY GROVE 315 J 326 17 18 30 17 57 399 O 83 1 City & Islington 31 1 MYDDELTON SQUARE 4 H College 1 1 to 118 4 18 ROW 15 CHADWELL STREET 12 CRUICKSHANK STREET Grace N FREDERICK’S Baptist WAKLEY STREET Church S T R E E T Crossrail 2 route (autumn 2015) Key Broxbourne HERTFORDSHIRE Cheshunt Stations London Underground Waltham Cross London Overground Enfield Lock Crossrail 1 National Rail To find out more Contact us Brimsdown Visit www.crossrail2.co.uk where you can viewENFIEL and D • Email: [email protected] Highspeed 1 download a range of factsheets, maps and other • Helpline: 0343 222 0055* Highspeed 2 information about the scheme. Ponders End Tramlink Come along to one of our drop-in events where you • Post: Freepost Crossrail 2 Consultations will have an opportunity to view our proposals and • Website: Tunnel portal speak to members of the Crossrail 2 team.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rail Accident Report
    Rail Accident Report Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Report 03/2014 February 2014 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Contents Summary 5 Introduction 6 Preface 6 Key definitions 6 The incident 7 Summary of the incident 7 Context 7 Events preceding the incident 9 Events following the incident 11 Consequences of the incident 11 The investigation 12 Sources of evidence 12 Key facts and analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Hampton Court to Berrylands / Oct 2015
    Crossrail 2 factsheet: Services between Berrylands and Hampton Court New Crossrail 2 services are proposed to serve all stations between Berrylands and Hampton Court, with 4 trains per hour in each direction operating directly to, and across central London. What is Crossrail 2? Crossrail 2 in this area Crossrail 2 is a proposed new railway serving London and the wider South East that could be open by 2030. It would connect the existing National Rail networks in Surrey and Hertfordshire with trains running through a new tunnel from Wimbledon to Tottenham Hale and New Southgate. Crossrail 2 will connect directly with National Rail, London Underground, London Overground, Crossrail 1, High Speed 1 international and domestic and High Speed 2 services, meaning passengers will be one change away from over 800 destinations nationwide. Why do we need Crossrail 2? The South West Main Line is one of the busiest and most congested routes in the country. It already faces capacity constraints and demand for National Rail services into Waterloo is forecast to increase by at least 40% by 2043. This means the severe crowding on the network will nearly double, and would likely lead to passengers being unable to board trains at some stations. Crossrail 2 provides a solution. It would free up space on the railway helping to reduce congestion, and would enable us to run more local services to central London that bypass the most congested stations. Transport improvements already underway will help offset the pressure in the short term. But we need Crossrail 2 to cope with longer term growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Silvertown Crossrail Station
    Challenges Lessons Learned Policy. Ensuring that the message, delivery of the The project is still at an early stage and stakeholder station post Crossrail and demonstrating that the support and momentum will be the key. The impacts on the operational railway line, is clear stakeholder support will come in the form of to ensure that the support of the policy makers placing the station in the upcoming policy docu- and provide the project with a strong supporting ments, the Mayor’s Transport Strategy, London position. Plan and London Borough of Newham’s local plans Silvertown crossrail and polies update. To ensure that the station can Design. Incorporating the station into the local be supported in policy the momentum of dialogue area and demonstrating how it enables it to thrive and supporting technical work is essential. station and create an interchange for passengers to ensure the local residential and business can see the To become a Major East London transport hub London City Airport needs to create an interchange for benefits the station could bring. international, national and local travel for people in London and the South-East. The Silvertown Crossrail station supports the airport travellers through the creation of new Mayor’s vision for strategic growth by maximising visitor destinations, providing retail and leisure the regeneration potential of the Royal Docks Area opportunities, particularly at Royal Victoria and as well as providing faster links to key London at Silvertown Quays. The introduction of a station employment areas, and unlocking more land for close to the airport would achieve similar results homes and businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering High Speed 2 Major Project Report
    DELIVERING HIGH SPEED 2 MAJOR PROJECT REPORT New rail reality Developing a £33bn rail network to transform Uk’s north-soUth 03|2012 CONNECTIONS Special report | High Speed 2 03 | 2012 Foreword 04 infrastructure specialists who supply the rail Introduction industry. Many of them are already helping HS2 Ltd chief executive Alison Munro us deliver Crossrail, Thameslink, electrifica- updates on the project’s progress tion, and upgrades to major stations like Reading and Birmingham. But even the 08 largest of these schemes will be dwarfed in Technical challenge size by HS2. So the challenge is for British Why the current London to West firms to develop the expertise to compete Midlands route is the best for key high speed contracts, and help deliver Britain’s Victorian engineering HS2 on time and on budget. 12 pioneers built a railway that was the The government’s National Infrastructure Euston envy of the world. Such was their Plan makes clear the importance of a predict- vision and singular focus that able and transparent pipeline of infrastruc- Expanding the station presents a ❝ following the opening of the first intercity line regeneration opportunity ture projects that will help the private sector between Manchester and Liverpool in 1830, it invest and plan for the future. HS2 will form 14 took just a little over two decades to construct a a key element of that long-term pipeline, Euston masterplan national rail network which linked all our major providing certainty about future contracting cities, and transformed our economy. Designs for Euston station opportunities following the Yet the modern reality is that since the terminus are vital to the project completion of Crossrail in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity on North-South Main Lines
    Capacity on North-South Main Lines Technical Report Report October 2013 Prepared for: Prepared by: Department for Transport Steer Davies Gleave Click here to enter text. 28-32 Upper Ground London SE1 9PD +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Technical Report CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... I 1 CREATING THE TIMETABLES THAT DETERMINE CAPACITY PROVISION IS A COMPLEX ISSUE .................................................................................................. 1 2 EUROPEAN COMPARISONS ........................................................................ 5 3 HOW CAPACITY CAN BE MEASURED ............................................................ 7 4 TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES ..................................................................... 9 5 CAPACITY AND THE NORTH-SOUTH ROUTES ................................................ 11 West Coast Main Line .............................................................................. 11 Midland Main Line .................................................................................. 13 East Coast Main Line ............................................................................... 14 Route section categorisation: green/orange/red ............................................ 15 FIGURES Figure 5.1 Assessed post-2019 Capacity Pressures on North-South Main Lines 19 Contents Technical Report Summary 1. This note assesses the capacity of the North-South Rail Lines in the UK from the perspective
    [Show full text]
  • Hsuk London Terminal Strategy
    HSUK LONDON TERMINAL STRATEGY In the development of high speed rail systems, the issue of terminal location and onward distribution of passengers assumes almost as much importance as the more obvious question of route. The new lines are designed to carry large volumes of passengers on trains operating at high frequencies, and these factors combine to create major flows arriving at city terminals which must then be efficiently dispersed onto the local public transport networks. This demands full integration of high speed and local systems, with optimised transfer at dedicated and fit-for- purpose terminals. These issues apply at all UK cities where high speed lines are planned, but are most acute in London, where passenger flows are greatest, and congestion in the existing public transport system is most critical. The following diagrams review existing central London connectivity issues, and compare and contrast the London terminal solutions proposed for HS2, and for the alternative High Speed UK proposals. For precise details of the core High Speed UK proposals (as included in the cost estimates), see the ‘200k’ series of plans. LTS1 : LONDON MAIN LINE NETWORK CIRCA 1963 LTS2 : EXISTING CENTRAL LONDON RAIL NETWORK INCLUDING CROSSRAIL SCHEME These diagrams show the rail network of central London, dominated by the classic terminus stations of the Victorian era. These are mostly reliant for onward connectivity upon the Tube network, which tended to form ‘nodes’ around the busier/more important termini. However, the change from main line to Tube is inherently inefficient, with passengers forced to detrain en masse, and with massive congestion occurring especially at rush hours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Midland Main Line and the Influence of HS2 a Short Report for North West Leicestershire District Council
    The Midland Main Line and the influence of HS2 A short report for North West Leicestershire District Council 1. Introduction Concerns have been raised recently about the relationship between the Midland Main Line (MML) and HS2, and whether the high-speed line is likely to have adverse effects on the existing network. At first sight, these concerns do not appear unreasonable in the context of recent Network Rail/Department for Transport decisions: There will be no electrification north of Kettering as this work has been halted in this and other locations. This raises a question about the viability of the Classic Connection with HS2 at Toton The new East Midlands contract will be 7+2, reducing the incentive for a new train operator to invest in new rolling stock; HSTs are scheduled to come out of service by 2019; possible replacements will not be able to attain the same speeds and this could adversely affect journey times. These points together make depressing reading, and it is understandable why there is a feeling that the MML is being sacrificed in favour of HS2 to make it a more attractive prospect for this part of England. The relationship between the MML and HS2 is an important one in the District, and currently it is finely balanced. The Council has been broadly supportive of the scheme because of the economic benefits that will follow on from the construction and operation of HS2, but there is a danger that this could change, particularly if continued opposition from residents and businesses alters the view of the elected members.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Into the Department for Transport's Decision to Cancel Three
    A picture of the National Audit Office logo Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Department for Transport Investigation into the Department for Transport’s decision to cancel three rail electrification projects HC 835 SESSION 2017–2019 29 MARCH 2018 4 What this investigation is about Investigation into the Department for Transport’s decision to cancel three rail electrification projects What this investigation is about 1 In July 2017 the Secretary of State for Transport announced the cancellation of three electrification projects serving different parts of the UK: the Midland Main Line north of Kettering (to Nottingham and Sheffield); the Great Western Main Line between Cardiff and Swansea; and the Lakes Line between Oxenholme and Windermere. Electrification of the Midland Main Line to Sheffield was a 2015 Conservative party manifesto commitment. The 2015 manifesto also stated that work was underway to electrify the railway in South Wales. These three projects are part of wider electrification projects for which works are either ongoing or already complete for large sections of these lines (Figure 1). 2 This investigation sets out the decision-making process, leading to the July 2017 announcement. It covers: • the original case for electrification; • why the Department for Transport (the Department) chose to cancel projects; • how it selected which projects to cancel; and • the Department’s assessment on the impact that cancelling the projects would have on promised benefits. 3 This investigation focuses on the three electrification projects the Secretary of State announced as cancelled in July 2017. Our investigation does not seek to evaluate the value for money of the projects or the decision to cancel.
    [Show full text]
  • Step Free Tube Guide
    How to plan a Tube 123456789 Chalfont & High Barnet Cockfosters Epping Step-free sample journey: A Watford C and DLR journey How to use this map Chesham Latimer Theydon Bois Sudbury Town to Borough B Totteridge & Whetstone Oakwood A Step-free eastbound only B 1 Check your starting and destination This map only shows stations where you can Debden A B Step-free eastbound only stations, plus any connections using the get between the platform and street step-free We have chosen a complex journey which Croxley Southgate B A A Woodside Park Loughton symbols shown in ‘How to use this map’. or change between lines step-free. We have includes all the symbols to show their Amersham Chorleywood Step-free C Then refer to the index overleaf for shown in a lighter shade all other Tube stations. meaning. southbound only B Stanmore Edgware Mill Hill East Arnos Grove Buckhurst Hill A Rickmansworth Moor Park B West Finchley A Stations where you can get between the Sudbury Town Step-free southbound only Roding additional details of access and Find on the map and check Harrow & platform and street step-free are marked with a Northwood A Burnt Oak Bounds Green Valley Chigwell connections at each station. You may the How to use this map section and West Ruislip Wealdstone Canons Park also wish to refer to the Sample journey coloured symbol and a letter. The colour and Index. As the Index shows you will have to Step-free Northwood Hills eastbound only Colindale A Finchley Central Wood Green box in the third column letter show the size of the step and gap Hillingdon Ruislip get on to the Piccadilly line eastbound Pinner A Grange Hill between the platform and the train, as follows: Ruislip Queensbury Woodford B B 2 Check that you can manage the step and platform (trains towards Acton Town) via A A A Manor A Kenton Hendon Central East Finchley Turnpike Lane Step North Harrow Hainault gap from the platform to the train, which Step Station Approach ( B step 153mm/gap Eastcote Seven Blackhorse can be up to 323mm (12.7 inches) for the The step between the platform to the train 107mm).
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed 2: Spring 2020 Update
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts High Speed 2: Spring 2020 update Third Report of Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 6 May 2020 HC 84 Published on 17 May 2020 by authority of the House of Commons The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No. 148). Current membership Meg Hillier MP (Labour (Co-op), Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Chair) Mr Gareth Bacon MP (Conservative, Orpington) Kemi Badenoch MP (Conservative, Saffron Walden) Olivia Blake MP (Labour, Sheffield, Hallam) Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP (Conservative, The Cotswolds) Dame Cheryl Gillan MP (Conservative, Chesham and Amersham) Peter Grant MP (Scottish National Party, Glenrothes) Mr Richard Holden MP (Conservative, North West Durham) Sir Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) Craig Mackinlay MP (Conservative, Thanet) Shabana Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham, Ladywood) Gagan Mohindra MP (Conservative, South West Hertfordshire) Sarah Olney MP (Liberal Democrat, Richmond Park) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Nick Smith MP (Labour, Blaenau Gwent) James Wild MP (Conservative, North West Norfolk) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • London Underground - 150 Years and Beyond
    A London Councils Member briefing January 2014 London Underground - 150 Years and Beyond 2013 saw celebrations of 150 years of an underground railway in London. The underground has changed and shaped the way people live in the capital and this anniversary has provided Transport for London with the opportunity to set out a vision for its future. Overview This briefing summarises Transport for London’s (TfL) vision for the future of the underground (Tube). Gareth Powell, Director of Strategy at London Underground, gave a presentation to the meeting of the Transport and Environment Committee on 12 December 2013. He stated London Underground’s priorities for the future are: • Keeping London Moving- Reliability and safely • Keeping London Growing - Capacity from the current network and from growing the network • Making Life in London Better - Customer service where every journey matters The vision also includes five commitments to Londoners: 1. Introduce a new 24-hour Tube service at weekends 2. Further improve the reliability and capacity of services 3. All Tube stations are controlled and staffed while services operating 4. Make journeys easier for customers – supported by technology 5. Deliver improvements with the best possible value for money Analysis For 150 years the Tube has been constantly evolving to meet the needs of Londoners. Today, the Tube travels 43 million miles and carries over one billion passengers a year. There have been many key milestones since it first opened in 1863, 10 are highlighted below: 1890 First deep level electric Tube railway in the world and access to platforms by hydaulic lift 1905-38 The Tube reshapes suburban London, including the development of ‘Metroland’ 1968-69 First computer-controlled underground railway in the world, with automatic trains and ticket gates 1977 First airport link for the Tube, with Picadilly line extension to Heathrow Central (terminals 1,2 and 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Matter M76 Further Suggested Changes to Be Made to Policy T3 Transport Capacity, Connectivity and Safeguarding and Policy T9 Fu
    Matter M76 Further suggested changes to be made to Policy T3 Transport capacity, connectivity and safeguarding and Policy T9 Funding transport infrastructure through planning • Bold blue – new text • Blue strikethrough – deleted original plan text • Purple strikethrough – deleted minor suggested change text • Bold purple- reinstated original text • Red bold – Minor Suggested change • Red strike through – minor suggested change Change ref no Policy/para Further suggested change /table/map M76.1 Policy T3, table 10.1 Transformation of Oxford Street low 2017- 2022 M76.2 Policy T3, table 10.1 ULEZ in central and inner London medium 2017- 2021 0 ULEZ in inner London low 2020- 2030 ULEZ strengthening London-wide low 2020- for buses, coaches and HGVs 2030 M76.3 Policy T3, table 10.1 Walk and cycle bridge between low 2020- Nine Elms and Pimlico river 2030 crossing: Nine Elms Pimlico Bridge M76.4 Policy T3, table 10.1 Bus network: wheelchair accessible low 2017- bus stops 2020 2041 M76.5 Policy T3, table 10.1 Bus transit pilots in Opportunity low 2020- Areas 2041 M76.6 Policy T3, table 10.1 Coach hub(s) upgrade and/or medium 2020- reprovision 2023 30 30 M76.7 Policy T3, table 10.1 Elizabeth line high 2017- 2021 0 M76.8 Policy T3, table 10.1 Elizabeth line extension / rail medium 2020- enhancements east of Abbey Wood / high 2041 M76.9 Policy T3, table 10.1 Heathrow Airport Southern Rail medium 2020 Access (required for if airport high - expansion proceeds) 2041 Heathrow Airport Western Rail medium 2020 Access (required for if airport high - expansion
    [Show full text]