Transportation Policymaking in Beijing and Shanghai: Contributors, Obstacles and Process
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Transportation Policymaking in Beijing and Shanghai: Contributors, Obstacles and Process Jungwoo Chun Department of Urban Studies & Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Rm 9-569, Cambridge, MA 02139 Tel: 617-319-8324; Email: [email protected] Joanna Moody Interdepartmental Program in Transportation Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Rm 1-151, Cambridge, MA 02139 Tel: 434-409-5679; Email: [email protected] Jinhua Zhao (corresponding author) Edward H. and Joyce Linde Associate Professor of City and Transportation Planning Department of Urban Studies & Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Rm 9-523, Cambridge, MA 02139 Tel: 617-324-7594; Email: [email protected] Word count (excluding references and abstract): 7,417 ACKNOWLEDMENTS The authors would like to thank all of the subjects of our interviews for their time and detailed commentary. We also acknowledge our colleagues in the MIT JTL Urban Mobility Lab who have contributed their critical commentary and support to this work, particularly Shenhao Wang and Xuenan Ni. This work was supported through the MIT Energy Initiative's Mobility of the Future study. HIGHLIGHTS • Identifies policy learning, data informatization and public opinion as contributors • Identifies public complaint, unilateral and fragmented decision-making as obstacles • Suggests indirect public participation is both a contributor and obstacle • Proposes processual model for transportation policymaking in Chinese megacities • Discusses lack of adaptiveness and potential for city-level policy experimentation 1 Transportation Policymaking in Beijing and Shanghai: Contributors, Obstacles and Process ABSTRACT 5 With continued motorization and urbanization in Chinese cities, there is a growing demand for innovative transportation policies at the city level to address the challenges of congestion, local air pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. Using Beijing and Shanghai as case studies, this paper draws on 32 in-depth semi-structured interviews with municipal government officials, academics, and transportation professionals to explore the city-level transportation policymaking process in 10 China. Across the two cities, we identify three common contributors – policy learning, data informatization, and public opinion – and four obstacles – public complaint, unilateral decision- making, inadequate coordination among relevant departments, and lack of adaptiveness in policy implementation practice – to adopting timely and appropriate transportation policies. We then introduce a processual model that connects the contributors and obstacles identified within the 15 flow of transportation policy among key actors in city-level government. This process shows how transportation policymaking in Chinese megacities is often reactive to public outcry over a transportation problem. This problem is investigated by a technical government research center that reports to the municipal transport committee. This committee then assesses public opinion and submits a policy recommendation to city government leadership, who make the final policy 20 decision. Based on both case studies, we discuss potential recommendations for how to better enable transportation policymaking at the city level in China through more formalized processes of policy experimentation and public participation. We conclude with a discussion of limitations and areas of future research. 25 Keywords: China municipal transportation policy, Beijing, Shanghai, policymaking process, public opinion 2 1. INTRODUCTION Chinese cities have been subject to accelerated urbanization and motorization over the past two decades, leading to issues such as congestion and air pollution (Gakenheimer, 1999). Nationwide, the growth rate of privately owned vehicles approached 30 percent in 2010 and a third of the 5 world’s 50 most congested cities were in China (Alam and Ahmed, 2013). According to the Ministry of Environmental Protection, only three cities in remote areas, among China's seventy- four major cities, met national standard for "fine air quality" in 2013 (Saikawa, 2014). This trend poses challenges to city governments to develop policies to address urbanization and 10 motorization. Although the Chinese national government sets a broad, national policy framework, city governments have autonomy to formulate and implement new urban transportation policy (Wan, Wang, and Sperling, 2013; Liang, 2014). In response, governments of major Chinese cities are actively seeking ways to implement new policy reforms and adopt updated strategic plans. However, within the transportation domain there is little scholarship around the underlying factors 15 that affect policy decision at the city level. This study characterizes the transportation decision-making processes in city governments in Beijing and Shanghai, China. Studying the internal operations of the Chinese government at any level and related to most policy areas is typically a challenge for international researchers. Yet 20 with in-depth interviews and iterative qualitative data analysis, this study identifies existing contributors and obstacles to transportation policy implementation and investigates the transportation policy decision-making process. In the transportation context, we corroborate and add to existing literature on city-level policymaking by identifying three key contributors in the transportation context – policy learning from other cities, transportation informatization, and 25 public opinion. We further identify four prominent obstacles to transportation policy decisions in Beijing and Shanghai – public complaint, unilateral decision-making structure, lack of cross- departmental communication and coordination, and lack of adaptiveness in policy implementation. We then illustrate how these factors connect to policy decision outcomes by mapping them to a processual model of how policy flows from one actor to another in the city 30 governments in Beijing and Shanghai. In each section examining contributors, obstacles, and process, we connect our findings for the transportation domain and the Chinese context to relevant literature in city-level policymaking. We then discuss how transportation policymaking in Beijing and Shanghai may benefit from more formalized processes of public participation and policy experimentation. We conclude with acknowledgment of the limitations of this study and a case for 35 further research into transportation decision-making at the city level in China. 1.1 Case Selection We conduct this study in two Chinese megacities: Beijing and Shanghai. These cities were chosen for several reasons. First, despite the differences in the political, institutional, and cultural 40 conditions, the physical and economic characteristics of these two megacities are representative of conditions in many rapidly developing cities in the Global South. China’s urban areas, which have grown by 350 million people over the past 30 years, have high population densities, rapidly rising incomes, and increasing rates of motorization (Woetzel et al., 2009). With these trends come congestion and pollution, which challenge other developing cities in South Asia and Latin 45 America. Second, China has a relatively strong government sector relative to its civil society and private sector and relative to some other less developed countries, which allows for a study of policymaking and implementation. 3 Large Chinese cities like Shanghai and Beijing face urban transportation challenges including congestion, air pollution, energy shortages, and global climate change (Wang, 2010). To combat these issues, major Chinese cities are trying to adopt new urban transportation management strategies (Peng, 2005). While most policymaking power is vested in the national government in 5 China, cities enjoy autonomy and discretion in policy implementation when addressing challenges of traffic congestion and local air pollution. Yang (2013) describes this model as “fragmented authoritarianism,” in which local Chinese authorities can make judgments about how to proceed with policy reforms. The evolution of Chinese bureaucracy attests to the fact that “local leaders have a great leverage on determining local priorities” (So and Kao, 2014). Given this level of local 10 autonomy in policy planning and implementation and trends of urbanization, it makes sense to focus on cities as cases of Chinese urban transportation policy decisions rather than the national government (Wan, Wang, and Sperling, 2013). Among Chinese cities and as provincial-level municipalities, Beijing and Shanghai have recently 15 demonstrated innovative policy implementation, experimenting with transportation policies including license plate lotteries and auctions aimed at restricting vehicle ownership. Moreover, they are also considered the pacesetters or engines for economic and socio-political development in China (Li, 2007). In addition to enjoying similar levels of policy innovation, both cities are comparable in size, economic and socio-demographic characteristics. Given their similarities, they 20 are strong cases for comparative analysis. At the same time, the selection of these two cities as case studies provides a unique opportunity to identify differences between the two cities and any factors that drive these differences. For example, due to a higher level of conservatism in Beijing, the role of public opinion may be less 25 prominent than in the case of Shanghai, which possesses