Addison and the Birth of Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics Author(S): William H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Addison and the Birth of Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics Author(S): William H Addison and the Birth of Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics Author(s): William H. Youngren Source: Modern Philology, Vol. 79, No. 3 (Feb., 1982), pp. 267-283 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/437151 Accessed: 17-09-2016 22:53 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/437151?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Modern Philology This content downloaded from 154.59.124.102 on Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:53:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Addison and the Birth of Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics William H. Youngren In an essay of several years ago' I tried to show that there is more continuity than has usually been thought between the criticism of poetry written in England during the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries and that written in the latter half of the seventeenth century. This continuity, I argued, was established by the central assumption, shared by earlier and later critics, that poetry's main job was to function as a moral teacher and that the best way it could do this was by furnishing sharp, sensuously vivid examples (or images or pictures). Such exam- ples, it was thought, could influence our conduct more directly and efficiently than either the bare precepts of the moral philosopher or the examples provided by the historian, which, unlike the poet's imagined or feigned examples, are tied to the messy (because fallen) world of fact and can thus not manifest their full moral implications as clearly as can the poet's examples. Nineteenth-century histories of English literature, as perpetuated in the course offerings of university English departments, have taught us to think of the earlier of these two periods (the "Renaissance") as radically separate in virtually all ways from the later (the "Restoration"); moreover, they have taught us to lump the later one together with the eighteenth century. There is, of course, much to be said in favor of this traditional grouping. But anyone who comes to eighteenth-century criticism and aesthetics aware of the tedious frequency with which the terms "precept" and "example" (or "image") occur in Restoration as well as in Renaissance criticism, and of the enormous importance, to Restoration as well as to Renaissance critics, of the point that they were used to make, is astonished that in the eighteenth century the terms, and the explanation of poetry's superiority as a moral teacher that they were used to provide, have quite suddenly vanished. It is true that throughout the eighteenth century (and even after) the terms still tended to crop up in informal talk about literature and morals. Pope, in a famous letter that he published in 1737 and claimed (perhaps fraudulently) to have written to Arbuthnot three years earlier, remarks that "the best Precepts, as well as the best Laws, would prove of small use, if there were no Examples to inforce them." Pope then continues: "General propositions are obscure, misty, and uncertain, compar'd with plain, full, and home examples: Precepts only apply to our Reason, which in most men is but weak: Examples are pictures, and strike the Senses, nay raise the Passions, and call in those (the strongest and most general of all motives) to the aid of reformation."'2 But all the other uses of the terms that I can recall encountering after about 1700 are more casual not only than their Restoration uses but also than the use Pope is making of them here. In Miscellaneous Reflections, Shaftesbury says of "poets even of the wanton sort": "Their example is the best of precepts, since they conceal nothing, are sincere, and speak their passion out aloud."'3 Fielding opens the first chapter of Joseph Andrews by remarking: "It is a 1/Youngren, "Generality, Science and Poetic Language in the Restoration," ELH 35 (1968): 158-87. 2/Alexander Pope, The Correspondence of Alexander Pope, ed. George Sherburn, 5 vols. (Oxford, 1956), 3:419. 3/Anthony Ashley Cooper, third earl of Shaftesbury, Characteristics, ed. John M. Robertson, 2 vols. (London, 1900), 2:347. o 1982 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 0026-8232/82/7903-0003$01.00 267 This content downloaded from 154.59.124.102 on Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:53:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 268 Modern Philology (February 1982) trite but true observation, that examples work more forcibly on the mind than precepts." Shortly after the beginning of the first chapter of The Decline and Fall, Gibbon speaks of the accession of Britain as the "single instance" in which "the successors of Caesar and Augustus were persuaded to follow the example of the former, rather than the precept of the latter."4 In the discussion of sentiments in the Elements of Criticism, Lord Kames promises "to place this matter in the clearest light, by adding example to precept."s In chapter 30 of Rasselas, Imlac, proposing the visit to the Pyramids, observes: "Example is always more effica- cious than precept. A soldier is formed in war, and a painter must copy pictures. In this, contemplative life has the advantage: great actions are seldom seen, but the labours of art are always at hand for those who desire to know what art has been able to perform." Finally, Reynolds seems to have the old pairing of terms in mind at a couple of points in the Discourses. In "Discourse II" he tells the students of the Royal Academy that by competing with one another and compar- ing their pictures they will come to know their deficiencies "more sensibly than by precepts, or any other means of instruction. The true principles of painting will mingle with your thoughts. Ideas thus fixed by sensible objects, will be certain and definitive; and sinking deep into the mind, will not only be more just, but more lasting than those presented to you by precepts only; which will always be fleet- ing, variable, and undetermined." And in "Discourse VIII," he says that the proper proportions for disposing masses in a picture "cannot be so well learnt by precept as by observation on pictures.''6 Clearly, I have not searched hard for these examples, and no doubt many more could easily be gathered from less obvious authors and books. But they would only enforce the point that one does not encounter the paired terms, used in the old general way, in the most serious critical and aesthetic writers of the century: Shaftesbury, Addison, Hutcheson, Hume, the Wartons, Gerard, Burke, Kames, Johnson, Reynolds, Reid, Alison, Knight, Stewart, Jeffrey--end the list where you will. Suddenly and quite dramatically, the assertion that the terms, used in the old way, were meant to advance-perhaps the central assertion of Restoration criticism of poetry--ceased to be important. Therefore both it and the terms themselves passed into the realm of cliche-"trite but true," as Fielding so aptly put it. Not very surprisingly, Addison seems to be the key figure in this change of critical terminology. At least since Basil Worsfold's The Principles of Criticism (1897), Addison has been called the founder of British (and even of modern) aesthetics so often that we should expect him to have had a hand in most of the important critical developments that took place during his lifetime. Yet his role in this particular one has, so far as I know, never been explored. The paired terms "precept" and "example" occur only a very few times in his contributions to The Spectator and not at all in his contributions to other periodicals. On the rare occasions when the terms do appear in The Spectator, they are never used in the old general way, to prove poetry's superiority as a moral teacher, but only in- cidentally and casually, as they were by the writers I have cited above-with the 4/Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, ed. J. B. Bury, 7 vols. (London, 1896- 1900), 1:3. 5/Henry Home, Lord Kames, Elements of Criticism, 3 vols. (London, 1762), 2:156. 6/Sir Joshua Reynolds, Discourses on Art, ed. Robert R. Wark (San Marino, Calif., 1959), pp. 31, 158. This content downloaded from 154.59.124.102 on Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:53:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Youngren/Addison and Aesthetics 269 possible exception of Pope, who was, however, writing only a letter. In Spectator Number 213, Addison remarks: "When I employ my self upon a Paper of Moral- ity, I generally consider how I may recommend the particular Vertue, which I treat of, by the Precepts or Examples of the ancient Heathens." And in Number 70 he uses the two terms in close proximity to each other but not really paired and almost as if by reflex, as if to use one automatically brought the other to mind and pen.
Recommended publications
  • Delightful Visibility and Its Limits. Joseph Addison on “The
    Delightful Visibility and its Limits. Joseph Addison on “The Pleasures of the Imagination” It is undoubtedly his close connection to Cartesianism1 which leads the French philosopher Nicolas Malebranche at the end of the 17th century to pay little attention to the relevance of the imagination for the realm of the visible. His programme of rationalism with its ambition to marginalize the human faculty of creating images by assigning it to a worthless sense perception renders it almost impossible to recognize the constitutive function of this faculty for visuality in general. A few decades later, however, things change with the emergence of empiricism and the publication of John Locke’s Essay concerning Human Understanding, especially with regard to the differentiation between primary and secondary qualities.2 According to this distinction, qualities like colours, sounds and tastes are not part of the material object itself but constructed in the process of perception. In contrast to primary qualities like extension and figure, which belong directly to the material object, secondary qualities like colours, sounds and tastes emerge from the imagination, proving it to be an important part of perception in general. Concerning these particular notions, it was Locke who gave Joseph Addison the cue for his Essay on the Pleasures of the Imagination.3 As unmistakably announced in the title of his essay, Addison undertakes nothing less than a counter-programme to Malebranche’s devaluation of the imagination, turning towards the delights affiliated with this faculty and at the same time attempting to establish a theoretical approach. Unlike other discourses on the imagination4, he does not attempt to defend or justify a ‚lesser’ human faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • PAPER VI UNIT I Non-Fictional Prose—General
    PAPER VI UNIT I Non-fictional Prose—General Introduction, Joseph Addison’s The Spectator Papers: The Uses of the Spectator, The Spectator’s Account of Himself, Of the Spectator 1.1. Introduction: Eighteenth Century English Prose The eighteenth century was a great period for English prose, though not for English poetry. Matthew Arnold called it an "age of prose and reason," implying thereby that no good poetry was written in this century, and that, prose dominated the literary realm. Much of the poetry of the age is prosaic, if not altogether prose-rhymed prose. Verse was used by many poets of the age for purposes which could be realized, or realized better, through prose. Our view is that the eighteenth century was not altogether barren of real poetry. Even then, it is better known for the galaxy of brilliant prose writers that it threw up. In this century there was a remarkable proliferation of practical interests which could best be expressed in a new kind of prose-pliant and of a work a day kind capable of rising to every occasion. This prose was simple and modern, having nothing of the baroque or Ciceronian colour of the prose of the seventeenth-century writers like Milton and Sir Thomas Browne. Practicality and reason ruled supreme in prose and determined its style. It is really strange that in this period the language of prose was becoming simpler and more easily comprehensible, but, on the other hand, the language of poetry was being conventionalized into that artificial "poetic diction" which at the end of the century was so severely condemned by Wordsworth as "gaudy and inane phraseology." 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Masculinization of Tragedy in Joseph Addison's Cato and George Lillo's
    Litera: Dil, Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies Litera 2018; 28(2): 233-252 DOI: 10.26650/LITERA2018-0006 Research Article Masculinization of Tragedy in Joseph Addison’s Cato and George Lillo’s The London Merchant Joseph Addison’un Cato ve George Lillo’nun Londralı Tüccar Eserlerinde Tragedyanın Maskülenleşmesi Sinan GÜL1 ABSTRACT During the 18th century, the development of gender and sexuality in the modern Western world was under tremendous impact of visual and literary culture. Considering this, by examining Addison’s Cato. A Tragedy. By Mr. Addison. Without the Love Scenes (1764) (Latin version) and Lillo’s The London Merchant (1731), this article analyzes the masculine features of the characters of 18th-century tragedies in England and investigates the reasons behind the dismissal and belittlement of love scenes and feminine qualities in those tragedies. In comedies, women and their qualities were openly ridiculed, while in tragedies, masculine values and patriarchal rules were overtly protected. Depicting societal norms and ideals, Cato and The London Merchant portray the evolving notions of masculinity. Despite increasing female influence in political and social culture, love, often associated with feminine qualities, was belittled in domestic and public domains. In doing so, playwrights either entirely ignored the idea of using female characters in their plays, thus creating contextual errors of portraying husbands without wives or sons without mothers, or depicted women as the sources of passion that could potentially destroy society, men in particular. Therefore, the concept of love was neglected, undervalued, or dismissed, with playwrights rather offering patriotic or capitalist virtues to substitute the idea of love so that their plays would be deemed as appropriate for public appreciation.
    [Show full text]
  • Macaulay's Essays on Milton and Addison... Online
    lzh5D (Read download) Macaulay's Essays On Milton And Addison... Online [lzh5D.ebook] Macaulay's Essays On Milton And Addison... Pdf Free From Ingramcontent DOC | *audiobook | ebooks | Download PDF | ePub Download Now Free Download Here Download eBook Ingramcontent 2012-04-01Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.69 x .58 x 7.44l, 1.10 #File Name: 1279308583278 pagesMacaulay s Essays on Milton and Addison | File size: 15.Mb From Ingramcontent : Macaulay's Essays On Milton And Addison... before purchasing it in order to gage whether or not it would be worth my time, and all praised Macaulay's Essays On Milton And Addison...: 2 of 2 people found the following review helpful. Literary prodigyBy Mary E. SibleyMacaulay's father was a philanthropist. He read from age three. He took pleasure in conversation. His first literary success was an essay on Milton, 1825. He was appointed a member of the Supreme Council of India.Joseph Addison resided at Magdalen College, Oxford for ten years. He was elected a fellow. His serious attention was concentrated on Latin Poetry. His classical knowledge was confined within narrow limits. Addison imitated Virgil with skill. He was probably introduced by Dryden to Congreve.In 1700 Addison was in France and subsequently in Genoa. Addison was not mean, he was not cowardly. He wrote with a delicate and humane sense of humor. He was in Parliament for nine years. His influence was the result of his literary talents. Addison did not speak in the chamber.Steele had known Addison from childhood. The best writing in THE TATLER was the handiwork of Addison.
    [Show full text]
  • Poetry As Correspondence in Early Modern England
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Unfolding Verse: Poetry As Correspondence In Early Modern England Dianne Marie Mitchell University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Recommended Citation Mitchell, Dianne Marie, "Unfolding Verse: Poetry As Correspondence In Early Modern England" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2477. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2477 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2477 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Unfolding Verse: Poetry As Correspondence In Early Modern England Abstract This project recovers a forgotten history of Renaissance poetry as mail. At a time when trends in English print publication and manuscript dissemination were making lyric verse more accessible to a reading public than ever before, writers and correspondents created poetic objects designed to reach individual postal recipients. Drawing on extensive archival research, “Unfolding Verse” examines versions of popular poems by John Donne, Ben Jonson, Mary Wroth, and others which look little like “literature.” Rather, these verses bear salutations, addresses, folds, wax seals, and other signs of transmission through the informal postal networks of early modern England. Neither verse letters nor “epistles,” the textual artifacts I call “letter-poems” proclaim their participation in a widespread social
    [Show full text]
  • Cato: a Tragedy, in Five Acts
    The Project Gutenberg eBook, Cato, by Joseph Addison, et al This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Cato A Tragedy, in Five Acts Author: Joseph Addison Release Date: March 10, 2010 [eBook #31592] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CATO*** E-text prepared by Delphine Lettau and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Canada Team (http://www.pgdpcanada.net) C AT O ; A Tragedy, IN FIVE ACTS, BY JOSEPH ADDISON, ESQ. AS PERFORMED AT THE THEATRE ROYAL, COVENT GARDEN. PRINTED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE MANAGERS FROM THE PROMPT BOOK. WITH REMARKS BY MRS. INCHBALD. PARIS, PRINTED FOR BAUDRY, ENGLISH, ITALIAN, SPANISH, PORTUGUESE AND GERMAN LIBRARY, RUE DU COQ-SAINT-HONORÉ. 1823. REMARKS. The author of this tragedy, to whose vigorous mind the English are indebted for their choicest moral works, came into the world with a frame so weak, that he was christened immediately on his birth, in consequence of the symptoms he gave of a speedy dissolution. The hand which reared him did a more than ordinary service to the age in which he lived, and to succeeding generations. Addison's pious writings, untainted by the rigour of superstition, have softened the harsh spirit of ancient religion, whilst they have confirmed all its principles. He was the son of the Reverend Launcelot Addison, Rector of Milston, in the county of Wilts, at which place he was born, on the 6th of May, 1672.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Kahn, Introduction to Montesquieu's Persian Letters
    Andrew Kahn, introduction to Montesquieu’s Persian Letters (1721] (Oxford Classics 2008), pp.xxii-ii. The following extract from Andrew Kahn’s Introduction the Persian Letters (1721) by Baron de Montesquieu shows how the idea of reporting on the nature of European society from the standpoint of remote foreigners such as Indians or Asiatics had caught hold of the imaginations of literary men in England and France in that period. His version of events reveals that Swift himself has the idea of writing “Indian Letters” and was beaten to it by his contemporary, the English man of letters and journalist Joseph Addison. Although Gulliver’s Travels is modelled on a genre of exotic travel-book including Marco Polo’s Travels (1323) and The Travels of Sir John Mandeville (1499), the trick of ‘defamiliarisation’ applied to European society in account of it given to the denizens used by Swift in Gulliver’s Travels (1726)—a reversal of the method—is very much of the same order as Montesqueiu’s letters and Addison’s “Indian Letter” before it, both of which he was most likely to have known when he put pen to paper to write the Travels in 1723. We can only guess at the precise impulse that led Montesquieu to conceive his oriental fiction. Montaigne’s reputation had lapsed during the height of French classicism, and he ceased to be reprinted for about fifty years from the 1670s; but, as we know from his notebooks, Montesquieu read and esteemed him and would certainly have known Montaigne’s great essay On Cannibals of 1580.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Enlightenment HI 215/PO 393
    The European Enlightenment HI 215/PO 393 Fall Term 2014 Professor James Schmidt Tuesday & Thursday 2:00-3:30 - 2:00, Shaw 201 745 Comm. Ave., Room 618A Office Hours: Tues 11:30AM-1:00PM & 617-358-1781 ([email protected]) Thurs. 3:45PM – 5 PM During the eighteenth century, Europe became modern. As a result of a transnational movement known as the Enlightenment many of the ideas, practices, and attitudes that have come to define what it means to be “modern” first began to take root in Europe and on the eastern coast of North America. This course explores how this change came about by tracing the transformation of European culture and society between the last decades of the seventeenth century and the end of the eighteenth century. Readings will be quite diverse in their concerns, their style, and their approach. Texts assigned include political tracts, philosophical essays, theological treatises, as well as a few examples from the “literary underground” of the eighteenth century. They will draw rather heavily on a few major figures — Voltaire, Diderot, Condorcet, Lessing, and the Scottish moralists — but will also pay attention to important eighteenth-century figures who are sometimes overlooked in introductory surveys (e.g., Moses Mendelssohn, Richard Price, and Joseph Priestley). Requirements and Grading Policy: There will be a mid-term exam during class on October 21 and a final exam on Tuesday, December 16 from 3:00-5:00 PM. Both will consist of a combination of short answers and somewhat more extended responses. You can expect questions that call upon you to discuss central concepts, institutions, and individuals covered in the readings or lectures.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Addison and Richard Steele. Selections from the Spectator Papers
    RESTORATION AND 18TH-CENTURY BRITISH LITERATURE GRADUATE COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION READING LIST SELECTED BY THE GRADUATE FACULTY THE DEGREE CANDIDATE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING READ ALL OF THE FOLLOWING WORKS: PROSE: Joseph Addison and Richard Steele. Selections from The Spectator Papers Aphra Behn. Oroonoko James Boswell. Selections from The Life of Johnson Edmund Burke. Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful Daniel Defoe. Robinson Crusoe or Moll Flanders Olaudah Equiano. The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano Henry Fielding. Shamela, Joseph Andrews David Hume. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding: Section X, Parts I-II (“Of Miracles”) Samuel Johnson. Rasselas, Selections from The Rambler John Locke. An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding: Book II, Chapter I (“Of Ideas in general, and their Original”); Book IV, Chapter XIX (“Of Enthusiasm”) Samuel Pepys. Selections from The Diary Ann Radcliffe. The Mysteries of Udolpho Samuel Richardson. Pamela Laurence Sterne. Tristram Shandy Jonathan Swift . “A Modest Proposal,” Gulliver’s Travels Horace Walpole. The Castle of Otranto Mary Wollstonecraft. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: Chapter 2; Chapter 9; Chapter 13, Section 6 Restoration/18th-Century British Literature 1 Rev. 1 August 2014 VERSE: Aphra Behn. “The Disappointment” Samuel Butler. Hudibras: Book I, Canto I John Dryden. “MacFlecknoe,” Absalom and Achitophel Oliver Goldsmith. “The Deserted Village” Thomas Gray. “Elegy Written in a Country Church-Yard” Samuel Johnson. “The Vanity of Human Wishes,”“London” Bernard Mandeville. “The Grumbling Hive; or, Knaves Turned Honest” (from The Fable of the Bees: Or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits) Alexander Pope. “An Essay on Criticism”; “The Rape of the Lock”; An Essay on Man: “Epistle I”; The Dunciad: “Book the First” Jonathan Swift , “A Description of the Morning,”“A Description of a City Shower,”“Cassinus and Peter,”“Verses on the Death of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope and Slavery
    Proceedings of the British Academy, 91,27753 Pope and Slavery HOWARD ERSKINE-HILL I am certainly desirous to run from my Country, if you’ll run from yours, and study Popery and Slavery abroad a while, to reconcile ourselves to the Church & State we may find at home on our return. (Pope to the Earl of Marchmont, 22 June 1740 Correspondence, IV. 250) 1 IN 1790 THE POET Alexander Radishchev, called ‘The First Russian Radical’, printed his Journey from St. Petersburg to Moscow, criticising the condition of the serfs under Catherine the Great, and dedicating it without permission to his friend, the poet A. M. Kutuzov. Kutuzov, alarmed with reason at this dedication, recounts how on an earlier occasion he had remonstrated with Radishchev, quoting to him in English Pope’s translation of Homer’s lfiad,Bk. I, the lines of Calchas to Achilles on the perils of telling unwelcome truths to kings: For I must speak what Wisdom would conceal, And Truths invidious [to] the Great reveal. Bold is the task! when Subjects grown too wise Instruct a Monarch where his Error lies; For tho’ we deem the short-liv’d fury past Be sure, the Mighty will revenge at last. (I. 101-6)’ 0 The British Academy 1998. ‘In my reference to Radishchev I am indebted to Professor Monica Partridge and to Professor A. G. Cross. The lines quoted from Pope’s Iliad translation by A. M. Kutuzov are I. 101-6; T. E. VIII. 92. The allusion is briefly discussed in David Marshal Lang, The First Russian Radical 1749-1802 (London, 1959), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Desire, Villainy, and Capital in Eighteenth-Century Fiction
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO IMAGINARY WANTS: DESIRE, VILLAINY, AND CAPITAL IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE BY SAMUEL TOMAN ROWE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2017 Table of contents List of figures iii Acknowledgements iv Introduction 1 1. Consumptive production 6 2. The persecutory plot 21 3. Tragedy and the other Enlightenment 36 I. Moll’s bundles: desire, tragi-comedy, and criminality in Defoe 42 1. The picaresque, the providential, the tragi-comic 44 2. Fortune, mastery, and the picaresque 54 3. The projector’s fortune, the tradesman’s bait 65 4. Bundles and baits 72 II. “Strange Diligence”: Lovelace and the rake ethic 90 1. The persecutory plot in Richardson 93 2. Strange diligence 99 3. Hedonism without heart 107 4. Smith’s shop 117 5. “Visionary gratification” and tragedy 126 III. Beckford’s insatiable caliph: oriental despotism and consumer society 129 1. The Asiatic mode of consumption 136 2. Luxuriance, privation, and the market 143 3. Beyond the palace of the senses 149 4. Enameling the sensorium 159 5. Damnation, the gaze, and sociality 164 IV. Matthew Lewis and the gothic face 174 1. The persecutory plot in romantic fiction 179 2. Gothic faciality 187 3. Lewis: capital accumulation and the flaming eye 203 Bibliography 217 ii List of figures 1. Sketch of Vathek’s tower attributed to William Beckford, c. 1843-4. Page 151. 2. Bookplate from William Lane’s circulating library. Page 202.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan the SATIRES of EDWARD YOUNG
    THE SATIRES OF EDWARD YOUNG Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Crowell, Richard Bruce, 1930- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 20:59:59 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/284864 This dissertation has been — microfilmed exactly as received 67-12,195 CROWELL, Richard Bruce, 1930- THE SATIRES OF EDWARD YOUNG. University of Arizona, Ph.D„ 1967 Language and Literature, general University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE SATIRES OF EDWARD YOUNG by Richard Bruce Crowell A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 7 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Richard Bruce Crowell entitled The Satires of Edward Young be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Direclor Date After inspection of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* C- -X , (*y 4Cf *This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination.
    [Show full text]