Hidden Worlds of Fundamental Particles David Curtin, and Raman Sundrum
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Hidden worlds of fundamental particles David Curtin, and Raman Sundrum Citation: Physics Today 70, 6, 46 (2017); View online: https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.3594 View Table of Contents: http://physicstoday.scitation.org/toc/pto/70/6 Published by the American Institute of Physics Articles you may be interested in In the digital age, physics students and professors prefer paper textbooks Physics Today 70, 30 (2017); 10.1063/PT.3.3657 Commentary: Surviving scientist burnout Physics Today 70, 10 (2017); 10.1063/PT.3.3675 Microscopy without lenses Physics Today 70, 50 (2017); 10.1063/PT.3.3693 As student labor movements grow, scientists turn activist Physics Today 70, 32 (2017); 10.1063/PT.3.3623 Kamifusen, the self-inflating Japanese paper balloon Physics Today 70, 78 (2017); 10.1063/PT.3.3437 A bridge between undergraduate and doctoral degrees Physics Today 70, 50 (2017); 10.1063/PT.3.3464 David Curtin is a postdoctoral research associate and Raman Sundrum is a professor in the department of physics, both at the University of Maryland in College Park. HIDDEN WORLDS of fundamental particles David Curtin and Raman Sundrum Spectacular bursts of particles that seem to appear out of nowhere may shed light on some of nature’s most profound mysteries. hy is there something rather than nothing? It’s a incredible cancellation among unrelated W parameters. There exist more attractive question so basic and so vast in scope that it seems solutions, including supersymmetry and beyond the realm of quantitative inquiry. And yet surprisingly, it is the Higgs boson as a composite particle, that also predict high-energy signatures a question that can be framed and at least partially answered in the of new physics at the Large Hadron Col- study of particle physics. lider (LHC). Second, stuff exists only because at The standard model (SM) is our current theory of matter some point in the early universe, there was one extra particle and its interactions. Written in the language of relativistic quan- of SM matter for every one billion matter–antimatter pairs. That tum field theory, it has stood up to several decades of tests at tiny excess is all that remains today, and it must have been cre- high-energy colliders. We know, however, that it cannot be the ated dynamically in the primordial plasma of the Big Bang. In complete description of the universe, in large part because in the SM, that process—baryogenesis—is too weak by many or- several important regards it fails to answer the something- ders of magnitude; evidently, additional particles and interac- versus-nothing question. tions must have been present. Theorists have suggested many Material existence is connected to three fundamental mys- possibilities, including additional Higgs bosons and modified teries. First, why can matter clump to form a rich array of struc- Higgs couplings that could be detected at the LHC. tures without collapsing into black holes? The requisite weak- Third, strong interlocking evidence from a multitude of as- ness of gravity arises because the particles that make up everyday trophysical and cosmological observations suggests that dark matter are incredibly light. In the SM, the mass of all funda- matter makes up about 80% of the matter in the universe. We mental particles must be less than the electroweak mass, whose have no definitive knowledge of what it is or how it connects value of a few hundred GeV/c2 follows from the physics of the to the SM. The most popular theories predict a tiny interaction Higgs boson. However, when the effects of gravity are taken of dark matter with ordinary matter. Such a coupling would into account, the SM electroweak scale receives quantum con- enable direct detection by nuclear recoils in sensitive detectors tributions on the order of the Planck mass, 1018 GeV/c2. That and indirect detection in cosmic-ray data that show evidence puzzling discrepancy of scale is called the hierarchy problem. of dark-matter annihilation into SM particles. In the SM, a particle’s lightness is recovered only thanks to an The hierarchy problem, the riddle of matter–antimatter 46 PHYSICS TODAY | JUNE 2017 (GHOST) RIDERS IN THE SKY by Christopher Arabadjis, 2009. HIDDEN WORLDS Hidden-sector production Energy asymmetry, and the nature of dark matter drive much of ex- perimental and theoretical particle physics. Many experimen- Mediator tal searches for answers to those mysteries are proceeding vig- orously, but so far with null results across the board. That doesn’t a mean nothing is to be discovered. On the contrary, the null re- sults may well point us toward the true nature of the universe. There could be hidden sectors—additional particles and Higgs forces—with only tiny couplings to the SM. Far from being in- b consequential, those new sectors can address all three big mys- teries. Their signatures are subtle and easily missed, but luck- ily, their hidden nature is also the key to their discovery. Invisible long-lived particles (LLPs) can be produced at collid- c ers and decay into energetic SM particles after traveling an ap- Standard Hidden model sector preciable distance. Can we catch those revealing flashes? A tale of two frontiers Hidden-sector slow decay Physicists built the LHC in part to access new physics at mass scales higher than those characteristic of the SM. However, new FIGURE 1. PORTALS TO HIDDEN SECTORS. The diagram represents physics may be concealed, not by virtue of high mass, but by the energies of possible hidden-sector states in relation to those of very small couplings to the SM. We use the term “hidden sec- the standard model. Colored arrows indicate possible transitions tors” to refer to such disconnected non-SM matter and forces, between states. At the Large Hadron Collider, hidden-sector states which can arise robustly within the framework of quantum can be created by means of the production and decay of heavy field theories. mediators (a), exotic decays of the Higgs boson (b), or small direct (c) Like the push for higher energy, the investigation of hidden couplings . Once produced, the states decay through the same portals. Hidden-sector states have long lifetimes because the direct sectors with tiny couplings to visible particles has important couplings are small or because energy must be borrowed, courtesy historical precedent. Neutrinos are almost massless, and nowa- of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, to excite the intermediate days they are understood to be related to charged leptons (elec- mediator or Higgs boson. trons, muons, and taus) through their shared weak interaction. Wolfgang Pauli postulated their existence in 1930 to restore conservation of momentum to beta decay, but their direct de- such a tiny keyhole, the decay can take a relatively long time. tection via scattering off nuclei wasn’t achieved until 1956, when That is what makes LLPs and their spectacular decays a hall- large neutrino fluxes from nuclear reactors became available. mark of hidden sectors. The discovery of the ghost-like neutrino sector was only the beginning, and those elusive particles still aren’t done confus- Solving mysteries ing us. For example, we know that neutrinos have masses and Searching for the flashes of LLP decays at the LHC and other oscillate from one type to another, which is not accounted for colliders will be a major enterprise. It will require dedicated in the SM. analyses and maybe new detectors, but it is well worth the ef- New hidden sectors can be connected to the SM by small fort. Here are just a few examples of how new sectors with hid- but nonzero couplings called portals. Figure 1 illustrates the den states address the three big mysteries. most important types. Portal couplings are small for several Let’s start with the hierarchy problem. As shown in figure 2, reasons. For example, symmetries can give rise to quantum me- known solutions cancel the top quark’s large quantum contri- chanical selection rules that force interactions between the SM bution to the Higgs (and thus electroweak) mass by introduc- and a hidden sector to proceed by means of a heavy and there- ing partners related to the top by a symmetry. In the case of fore hard-to-access mediator state. The mediator is not part of supersymmetry, the top partners take part in the SM’s strong the SM but interacts with both the SM and hidden sectors. interaction, so they should be produced in large numbers at It’s possible for some SM states—most importantly the pho- the LHC. ton and the Higgs boson—to function as a mediator. Although We haven’t found any sign of those partners yet, but another the structure of the theory makes the Higgs-portal and photon- solution, called neutral naturalness,3 relies on hidden valleys,4 portal couplings smaller than ordinary SM couplings, they are which are a family of theories that are essentially cousins of readily made much larger than the couplings of other types of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the theory of the SM’s strong portals. Furthermore, accelerators produce lots of Higgs bosons interactions. Hidden valleys give rise to low-energy bound and photons. In rough analogy to an oscillating neutrino, a states; in analogy to SM protons and pions, they are called hid- photon could transform into a hidden photon and interact with den hadrons. In theories of neutral naturalness, the top partner hidden states.1 The Higgs boson, with a mass of 125 GeV/c2, is does not interact via the SM strong force, but it does interact heavy enough to sometimes decay directly into the hidden sec- via those hidden cousins of QCD.