Monitoring Zu Den Folgen Von Lokalen Klimaveränderungen Auf Die Schutzgüter Der Eisfreien Gebiete Der Maxwell Bay (King George Island, Antarktis) Endbericht

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monitoring Zu Den Folgen Von Lokalen Klimaveränderungen Auf Die Schutzgüter Der Eisfreien Gebiete Der Maxwell Bay (King George Island, Antarktis) Endbericht TEXTE 25 /2017 Monitoring zu den Folgen von lokalen Klimaveränderungen auf die Schutzgüter der eisfreien Gebiete der Maxwell Bay (King George Island, Antarktis) Endbericht TEXTE 25/2017 Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit Forschungskennzahl 3712 87 100 UBA-FB 002366 Monitoring zu den Folgen von lokalen Klimaveränderungen auf die Schutzgüter der eisfreien Gebiete der Maxwell Bay (King George Island, Antarktis) von Christina Braun, Jan Esefeld, Dr. Hans-Ulrich Peter AG Polar- & Ornitho-Ökologie, Institut für Ökologie, Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes Impressum Herausgeber: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Durchführung der Studie: Institut für Ökologie, AG Polar- & Ornitho-Ökologie Friedrich Schiller-Universität Jena Dornburger Straße 159 07743 Jena Abschlussdatum: Dezember 2016 Redaktion: Fachgebiet II 2.8 Schutz der Arktis und Antarktis Fritz Hertel Publikationen als pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen ISSN 1862-4359 Dessau-Roßlau, März 2017 Das diesem Bericht zu Grunde liegende Vorhaben wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit unter der Forschungskennzahl 3712 87 100 gefördert. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt dieser Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autorinnen und Autoren. Kurzbeschreibung Die Fildes-Region (King George Island, South Shetland Islands), bestehend aus der Fildes Peninsula, der angrenzenden Ardley Island sowie allen größeren benachbarten Inseln, gehört zu den größten eisfreien Gebieten im Bereich der maritimen Antarktis und weist eine vergleichsweise hohe Biodiversität auf. Gleichzeitig repräsentiert diese Region mit sechs ansässigen Stationen, zahlreichen Feldhütten sowie einer Landebahn das logistische Zentrum im Bereich der Antarktischen Halbinsel, woraus häufig Interessenkonflikte zwischen den verschiedenen Nutzergruppen resultieren. Aufgrund der hohen Bedeutung langfristiger Monitoringprogramme, insbesondere in Gebieten rasanter klimatischer Veränderungen und mit einem hohen Gefährdungsrisiko für die Schutzgüter der Region, wurde die in den 1980er Jahren begonnene Bestandsaufnahme der lokalen Brutvogel- und Robbengemeinschaft in der Fildes-Region während der Sommermonate (Dezember bis Februar) der Saisons 2012/13 bis 2014/15 fortgesetzt. Daneben erfolgte eine Brutvogelerfassung in allen größeren eisfreien Bereichen der an die Fildes-Region angrenzenden Maxwell Bay. Diese umfassten die Gebiete Barton, Weaver und Potter Peninsula, am Green Point (alle King George Island) sowie für Stansbury Peninsula, Martin und Duthoit Point (alle Nelson Island). Für die Analyse von Langzeittrends der Vogel- sowie der Robbenbestände wurden zusätzlich zu eigenen Erfassungen umfangreiche Daten aus zahlreichen, bislang unveröffentlichten Expeditionsberichten deutscher Wissenschaftler aus den 1980er Jahren sowie sämtlicher verfügbarer Literatur herangezogen. Die Ergebnisse dieser beiden Monitoringschwerpunkte werden in dem vorliegenden Forschungsbericht präsentiert. Deutlich wird hierbei, dass die Mehrzahl der Seevogelarten hinsichtlich ihrer Brutpaarzahlen vornehmlich von natürlichen Umweltfaktoren abhängen, andere dagegen stärker auf anthropogene Einflüsse reagieren. Zusätzlich wurden anhand von Luft- und Satellitenaufnahmen teilweise erhebliche Gletscherrückzugsgebiete ausgewählter Bereiche der Maxwell Bay in Bezug auf die regionale klimatische Entwicklung dokumentiert. Abstract The Fildes Region (King George Island, South Shetland Islands), consisting of the Fildes Peninsula, the neighbouring Ardley Island and all larger, nearby islands, is one of the largest ice-free regions in maritime Antarctica and has a relatively high level of biodiversity. This area also represents the logistical centre of the Antarctic Peninsula with its six permanent stations, numerous field huts and an airstrip, which often leads to conflict of interests between the different user groups. Given the great importance of long-term monitoring programmes, especially in regions with natural resources at high risk and in areas of rapid climatic change, the survey of local breeding birds and seal communities started in the 1980s in the Fildes Region was continued in the summer months (December to February) of the 2012/13 to 2014/15 seasons. Besides, a monitoring of breeding birds in all large ice-free areas of Maxwell Bay, which borders the Fildes Region. These included the Barton, Weaver and Potter Peninsulas, Green Point (all on King George Island) and for the Stansbury Peninsula, Martin and Duthoit Points (all on Nelson Island). To analyse long-term trends in the bird and seal populations, extensive data from numerous, still unpublished expedition reports of German scientists from the 1980s and all available literature were added to recent observations. The results of both monitoring focus areas are presented in this research report. It could be shown, that regarding their breeding pair numbers most seabird species depend primarily on environmental factors, whereas others are more affected by anthropogenic impacts. 4 Additionally, considerable glacial retreat in selected regions of the Maxwell Bay with reference to the regional climate changes were documented on the basis of aerial and satellite images. 5 Inhaltsverzeichnis Abbildungsverzeichnis ............................................................................................................................ 8 Tabellenverzeichnis ...............................................................................................................................14 Abkürzungen .........................................................................................................................................18 Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................................................19 Summary ................................................................................................................................................27 1 Einleitung.......................................................................................................................................35 2 Monitoring der Brutvögel und Robben in der Fildes-Region ..................................................38 2.1 Methodik .................................................................................................................................38 2.2 Pinguine (Pygoscelis spec.) ...................................................................................................42 2.2.1 Ardley Island .....................................................................................................................43 2.2.2 Pinguinkolonien an der Westküste der Fildes Peninsula ............................................56 2.3 Südlicher Riesensturmvogel (Macronectes giganteus) ......................................................56 2.4 Kapsturmvogel (Daption capense) .......................................................................................65 2.5 Rußalbatros (Phoebetria palpebrata)...................................................................................68 2.6 Weißgesichtscheidenschnabel (Chionis alba) ....................................................................69 2.7 Skuas (Catharacta spec.) ........................................................................................................70 2.8 Dominikanermöwe (Larus dominicanus)............................................................................74 2.9 Antarktisseeschwalbe (Sterna vittata) ..................................................................................77 2.10 Potentielle Brutvögel , Durchzügler und Irrgäste .............................................................79 2.11 Robben ....................................................................................................................................82 2.11.1 Südlicher Seeelefant (Mirounga leonina) ......................................................................83 2.11.2 Weddellrobbe (Leptonychotes weddelli) .......................................................................87 2.11.3 Antarktischer Seebär (Arctocephalus gazella)...............................................................88 2.11.4 Robbenwurfplätze in der Fildes-Region.........................................................................91 2.12 Aktuelle Gefährdungen von Vögeln und Robben in der Fildes-Region .........................95 2.13 Schlussfolgerungen ................................................................................................................96 3 Brutvogelmonitoring in den eisfreien Gebieten der Maxwell Bay .........................................98 3.1 Einleitung ...............................................................................................................................98 3.2 Barton Peninsula ....................................................................................................................99 3.3 Weaver Peninsula ............................................................................................................... 106 3.4 Green Point.......................................................................................................................... 109 3.5 Potter Peninsula .................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Example of Potter Cove (King George Island, South Shetlands)
    Journal of Marine Systems, 4 (1993) 289-301 289 Elsevier Science Publishers B.Y., Amsterdam Seasonal variation of algal growth conditions in sheltered Antarctic bays: the example of Potter Cove (King George Island, South Shetlands) Heinz Kloser a, Gustavo Ferreyra b, Irene Schloss b,c, Guillermo Mercuri b, Frank Laturnus d, Antonio Curtosi b a Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Center for Estuarine and Coastal Ecology, Vierstraat 28,4401 EA Yerseke, The Netherlands, (Publication number 596) b Instituto Antartico Argentino, Cerrito 1248, 1010 Buenos Aires, Argentina C Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientfficas y Teenicas, Ri~'adavia 1917, 1013 Buenos Aires, Argentina d Alfred-Wegener-Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Columbusstrasse, 2850 Bremerhaven, Germany (Received October 10, 1992; revised and accepted May 11, 1993) ABSTRACf Wind, air temperature, surface irradiance, light penetration into the water, salinity and water temperature have been recorded from mid November to mid February in Potter Cove, King George Island. Results are compared with published data on requirements for growth of Antarctic macroalgae. The investigated season showed two distinct periods: Early summer lasted until end of December with comparatively cold temperatures, unstable water column and deep penetration of light; late summer started in early January and was characterized by reduced salinity due to meltwater discharge and high turbidity due to suspended sediments. Meltwater influence did not sufficiently change salinity to be responsible for the frequently noted paucity of macroalgal communities in sheltered bays. Shading by suspended sediments was equally considered to be of minor importance, as macroalgae have their optimal growth phase from September to December. During this period, light penetration and depth distribution of macro algae coincide perfectlY.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Peninsula
    Hucke-Gaete, R, Torres, D. & Vallejos, V. 1997c. Entanglement of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, by marine debris at Cape Shirreff and San Telmo Islets, Livingston Island, Antarctica: 1998-1997. Serie Científica Instituto Antártico Chileno 47: 123-135. Hucke-Gaete, R., Osman, L.P., Moreno, C.A. & Torres, D. 2004. Examining natural population growth from near extinction: the case of the Antarctic fur seal at the South Shetlands, Antarctica. Polar Biology 27 (5): 304–311 Huckstadt, L., Costa, D. P., McDonald, B. I., Tremblay, Y., Crocker, D. E., Goebel, M. E. & Fedak, M. E. 2006. Habitat Selection and Foraging Behavior of Southern Elephant Seals in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2006, abstract #OS33A-1684. INACH (Instituto Antártico Chileno) 2010. Chilean Antarctic Program of Scientific Research 2009-2010. Chilean Antarctic Institute Research Projects Department. Santiago, Chile. Kawaguchi, S., Nicol, S., Taki, K. & Naganobu, M. 2006. Fishing ground selection in the Antarctic krill fishery: Trends in patterns across years, seasons and nations. CCAMLR Science, 13: 117–141. Krause, D. J., Goebel, M. E., Marshall, G. J., & Abernathy, K. (2015). Novel foraging strategies observed in a growing leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) population at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Animal Biotelemetry, 3:24. Krause, D.J., Goebel, M.E., Marshall. G.J. & Abernathy, K. In Press. Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Mammal Science.Leppe, M., Fernandoy, F., Palma-Heldt, S. & Moisan, P 2004. Flora mesozoica en los depósitos morrénicos de cabo Shirreff, isla Livingston, Shetland del Sur, Península Antártica, in Actas del 10º Congreso Geológico Chileno.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Treaty
    The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Thirty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty November 2017 Cm 9542 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-0126-9 CCS1117441642 11/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majestyʼs Stationery Office MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE THIRTY-NINTH ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 The Measures1 adopted at the Thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e. all the Consultative Parties). The full text of the Final Report of the Meeting, including the Decisions and Resolutions adopted at that Meeting and colour copies of the maps found in this command paper, is available on the website of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat at www.ats.aq/documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 16791 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements. amended (‘‘ACA’’) (16 U.S.C. 2401, et ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Dated: April 12, 2019. seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Justice in Minority Environmental Protection to the Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Populations and Low-Income Antarctic Treaty (‘‘the Protocol’’). Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Annex V contains provisions for the 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is protection of specially designated areas Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows: specially managed areas and historic are established on the basis of a petition sites and monuments. Section 2405 of under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 180—[AMENDED] title 16 of the ACA directs the Director the tolerance exemption in this action, of the National Science Foundation to ■ do not require the issuance of a 1. The authority citation for part 180 issue such regulations as are necessary proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows: and appropriate to implement Annex V Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. to the Protocol. et seq.) do not apply. ■ 2. Add § 180.1365 to subpart D to read The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which This action directly regulates growers, as follows: includes the United States, periodically food processors, food handlers, and food adopt measures to establish, consolidate retailers, not States or tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Flnitflrcililcl
    flNiTflRCililCl A NEWS BULLETIN published quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC) svs-r^s* ■jffim Nine noses pointing home. A team of New Zealand huskies on the way back to Scott Base after a run on the sea ice of McMurdo Sound. Black Island is in the background. Pholo by Colin Monteath \f**lVOL Oy, KUNO. O OHegisierea Wellington, atNew kosi Zealand, uttice asHeadquarters, a magazine. n-.._.u—December, -*r\n*1981 SOUTH GEORGIA SOUTH SANDWICH Is- / SOUTH ORKNEY Is £ \ ^c-c--- /o Orcadas arg \ XJ FALKLAND Is /«Signy I.uk > SOUTH AMERICA / /A #Borga ) S y o w a j a p a n \ £\ ^> Molodezhnaya 4 S O U T H Q . f t / ' W E D D E L L \ f * * / ts\ xr\ussR & SHETLAND>.Ra / / lj/ n,. a nn\J c y DDRONNING d y ^ j MAUD LAND E N D E R B Y \ ) y ^ / Is J C^x. ' S/ E A /CCA« « • * C",.,/? O AT S LrriATCN d I / LAND TV^ ANTARCTIC \V DrushsnRY,a«feneral Be|!rano ARG y\\ Mawson MAC ROBERTSON LAND\ \ aust /PENINSULA'5^ *^Rcjnne J <S\ (see map below) VliAr^PSobral arg \ ^ \ V D a v i s a u s t . 3_ Siple _ South Pole • | U SA l V M I IAmundsen-Scott I U I I U i L ' l I QUEEN MARY LAND ^Mir"Y {ViELLSWORTHTTH \ -^ USA / j ,pt USSR. ND \ *, \ Vfrs'L LAND *; / °VoStOk USSR./ ft' /"^/ A\ /■■"j■ - D:':-V ^%. J ^ , MARIE BYRD\Jx^:/ce She/f-V^ WILKES LAND ,-TERRE , LAND \y ADELIE ,'J GEORGE VLrJ --Dumont d'Urville france Leningradskaya USSR ,- 'BALLENY Is ANTARCTIC PENIMSULA 1 Teniente Matienzo arg 2 Esperanza arg 3 Almirante Brown arg 4 Petrel arg 5 Deception arg 6 Vicecomodoro Marambio arg ' ANTARCTICA 7 Arturo Prat chile 8 Bernardo O'Higgins chile 9 P r e s i d e n t e F r e i c h i l e : O 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 K i l o m e t r e s 10 Stonington I.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 218/Monday, November 14, 2005
    69100 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 218 / Monday, November 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations HSM 47 Buildings on I˘le des Pe´trels, HSM 76 Ruins of base ‘‘Pedro Aguirre Dated: November 4, 2005. Terre Ade´lie Cerda’’, Pendulum Cove, Deception Gerald Zaffos, HSM 48 Cross on ˘Ile des Pe´trels, Terre Island Director, Contract Policy Division. Ade´lie HSM 77 Cape Denison, Federal Acquisition Circular HSM 49 Pillar at Bunger Hill, Queen Commonwealth Bay, George V Land Mary Land Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) HSM 50 Plaque at Fildes Peninsula, HSM 78 Memorial Plaque at India Point, Humboldt Mountains, 2005-06 Correction is issued under the King George Island, South Shetland authority of the Secretary of Defense, Islands Wohlthat Massif, central Dronning Maud Land the Administrator of General Services, HSM 51 Grave and cross at Admiralty and the Administrator for the National Bay, King George Island, South HSM 79 Lilie Marleen Hut, Mt. Aeronautics and Space Administration. Shetland Islands Dockery, Everett Range, Northern HSM 52 Monolith at Fildes Peninsula, Victoria Land Unless otherwise specified, all Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) King George Island, South Shetland HSM 80 Amundsen’s Tent Islands and other directive material contained HSM 53 Monolith and plaques on [FR Doc. 05–22545 Filed 11–10–05; 8:45 am] in FAC 2005-06 Correction are effective Elephant Island, South Shetland BILLING CODE 7555–01–M November 14, 2005. Islands Dated: November 4, 2005. HSM 54 Bust on Ross Island Domenic C. Cipicchio, HSM 55 Buildings and artifacts on DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Acting Director, Defense Procurement and Stonington Island, Marguerite Bay, Acquisition Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ross Sea Antarctica Ski Touring
    ROSS SEA ANTARCTICA SKI TOURING 2022 TRIP NOTES ROSS SEA ANTARCTICA SKI TOURING TRIP NOTES 2022 TRIP DETAILS Dates: February 10 to March 11 Duration: 30 days Departure: ex Invercargill, New Zealand Price: From US$23,000 per person + US$7,500 Ski Touring Add-On Experience a ski touring journey like no other! Photo: Mark Sedon Be the first to join Adventure Consultants and Heritage Expeditions on an exploratory ski touring expedition to Antarctica’s Ross Sea region. Blocked by impenetrable ice for most of the year, the Ross Sea region is rarely visited by tourists and never before have tour groups explored the vast ice and snow covered landscapes on skis! Our ship-based Ross Sea Antarctica Ski Touring Breaking up our journey south, we hop between the Expedition is an exploratory journey that takes you little known Subantarctic Islands taking in the Snares, through New Zealand’s Subantarctic Islands to the Ross Auckland, Macquarie and Campbell Islands. These islands Sea and onto the slopes of Mt Erebus. Enjoy remote, are all part of the amazing and dynamic Southern Ocean pristine ski mountaineering, visit historic sites and ecosystem of which Antarctica is at the very heart. scientific bases, learn about the wildlife and efforts to conserve the unique history and ecology of the world’s Our program once we arrive in the Ross Sea region last untouched wilderness. offers some flexibility to work around weather and sea ice floes. The density and direction of the pack ice Suitable for skiers and non-skiers alike, this expedition can impact on our ability to land the Zodiacs, however, will take you into the heart of Antarctica’s Ross Sea, one there are countless options across the region and our of the most fascinating areas on the frozen continent.
    [Show full text]
  • National Science Foundation § 670.29
    National Science Foundation § 670.29 the unique natural ecological system ASPA 115 Lagotellerie Island, Mar- in that area; and guerite Bay, Graham Land (c) Where a management plan exists, ASPA 116 New College Valley, information demonstrating the consist- Caughley Beach, Cape Bird, Ross Is- ency of the proposed actions with the land management plan. ASPA 117 Avian Island, Marguerite Bay, Antarctic Peninsula § 670.29 Designation of Antarctic Spe- ASPA 118 Summit of Mount Mel- cially Protected Areas, Specially bourne, Victoria Land Managed Areas and Historic Sites ASPA 119 Davis Valley and Forlidas and Monuments. Pond, Dufek Massif, Pensacola Moun- (a) The following areas have been tains designated by the Antarctic Treaty ASPA 120 Pointe-Geologie Parties for special protection and are Archipelego, Terre Adelie hereby designated as Antarctic Spe- ASPA 121 Cape Royds, Ross Island cially Protected Areas (ASPA). The ASPA 122 Arrival Heights, Hut Point Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Peninsula, Ross Island amended, prohibits, unless authorized ASPA 123 Barwick and Balham Val- by a permit, any person from entering leys, Southern Victoria Land or engaging in activities within an ASPA 124 Cape Crozier, Ross Island ASPA. Detailed maps and descriptions ASPA 125 Fildes Peninsula, King of the sites and complete management George Island (25 de Mayo) plans can be obtained from the Na- ASPA 126 Byers Peninsula, Living- tional Science Foundation, Office of ston Island, South Shetland Islands Polar Programs, National Science ASPA 127 Haswell Island Foundation, Room 755, 4201 Wilson ASPA 128 Western shore of Admiralty Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230. Bay, King George Island, South Shet- ASPA 101 Taylor Rookery, Mac.
    [Show full text]
  • A Method for Assessing the Eco-Environmental Vulnerability Of
    A METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE ECO-ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY OF FILDES PENINSULA, ANTARCTICA Xiaoping Pang [email protected] 1 School of Resource and Environmental Science Wuhan University Wuhan 430079, China 2.Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China; Shanshan Tong [email protected] School of Resource and Environmental Science Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China Peilan Liu [email protected] School of Resource and Environmental Science Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China Abstract Global change and sustainable development have become a hot topic in the world today. Recent studies concerning the impact of the global change on Antarctic and the interaction between global change and Antarctic environment have covered different scales and different disciplines in China. However, it is extremely difficult to implement comprehensive researches on the Antarctic environment change issues due to the peculiar conditions in this region. The methodology which combines the multi-scale information is a desirable and effective way for the study on the global change and Antarctic reactions. Focused on ice-free areas along Antarctic coast, this research analyzes the factors that contribute to eco-environmental vulnerability in ice-free areas, and brings forward a new technical framework for eco-environmental vulnerability quantitative assessment based on GIS. The assessment results can serve as a valuable basis for administration department to protect the Fildes Peninsula from artificial destruction. The body of this paper begins with a description of the characteristic of eco-environment vulnerability in Fildes Peninsula, which is a typical ice-free area located in the northeast Antarctic and exemplifies the whole evaluation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Proceedings
    2ICI AU9817362 "SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ISOTOPES' MILLENNIUM SYDNEY 12 - 16 OCTOBER 1997 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS PAPERS 61-113 HOSTED BY THE AUSTRALIAN NUCLEAR ASSOCIATION INC. 29-45 AU9817363 226Ra MEASUREMENT BY THERMAL IONISATION MASS SPECTROMETRY : USE OF 226Ra AND 14C FOR GROUNDWATER DATING L. DEVER(1) and C fflLLAIRE-MARCEL(2) (1) Laboratoire d'Hydrologie et de Geochimie Isotopique UNIVERSITE PARIS-SUD 91405 91405 ORSAY, FRANCE. (2) GEOTOP, UNIVERSITE DU QUEBEC A MONTREAL 1200 Saint Alexandra H3C3P8 MONTREAL, CANADA. SUMMARY The measurement of radium by TIMS allows analysis on small water samples (100 ml). After Ra /Ba separation by chromatography the radium is measnred by mass spectrometry with an uncertainty of 2 %. Radium with an half fife of 1620 years is a very interesting radichronometer in a time range (0-5000) for which the radiocarbon datation on total dissolved inorganic carbon is quite difficult. Three sources of Radium has been identified: the radium coming from the dissolution of carbonates, the radium issued from 230Th decay, 230Th which is insoluble and absorbed on the grain surface and the radium produced by recoil effect. In the unconfined aquifer with ages from 0 to 4000 the dissolution process is the major source. For older water in the confined part of the aquifer, the radium produced by the decay of the absorbed 23OTh cannot be neglected- The radium produced by recoil effect is very low. Through a geochemieal modeJ based on strontium concentration (which has the same chemical behaviour of radium) the three sources of radium are taken in account for an age calculation.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Antarctic Activities 2003-2004
    United States Antarctic Activities 2003-2004 This site fulfills the annual obligation of the United States of America as an Antarctic Treaty signatory to report its activities taking place in Antarctica. This portion details planned activities for July 2003 through June 2004. Modifications to these plans will be published elsewhere on this site upon conclusion of the 2003-2004 season. National Science Foundation Arlington, Virginia 22230 November 30, 2003 Information Exchange Under United States Antarctic Activities Articles III and VII(5) of the ANTARCTIC TREATY Introduction Organization and content of this site respond to articles III(1) and VII(5) of the Antarctic Treaty. Format is as prescribed in the Annex to Antarctic Treaty Recommendation VIII-6, as amended by Recommendation XIII-3. The National Science Foundation, an agency of the U.S. Government, manages and funds the United States Antarctic Program. This program comprises almost the totality of publicly supported U.S. antarctic activities—performed mainly by scientists (often in collaboration with scientists from other Antarctic Treaty nations) based at U.S. universities and other Federal agencies; operations performed by firms under contract to the Foundation; and military logistics by units of the Department of Defense. Activities such as tourism sponsored by private U.S. groups or individuals are included. In the past, some private U.S. groups have arranged their activities with groups in another Treaty nation; to the extent that these activities are known to NSF, they are included. Visits to U.S. Antarctic stations by non-governmental groups are described in Section XVI. This document is intended primarily for use as a Web-based file, but can be printed using the PDF option.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAVEL SERVICES @ Horchow.Com
    TRAVEL SERVICES For inquiries, bookings or for more information please contact us at: 1-800-933-4858 [email protected] or visit our website for more travel offerings at www.horchow.com/Travel HORCHOW 2012 EXPEDITIONS 1 extraordinary experiences It seems that every day we read of another new mega liner being recognised internationally through Green Globe EC3 accreditation, launched, each attempting to outdo the other with added theme and I am proud that we were named Best Responsible Cruise park attractions. I am pleased to say that our approach is the Operator at the internationally acclaimed 2010 Responsible Tourism opposite. For us instead of a theatre with wide screen movies we Awards which took place as part of World Travel Market in London. offer the real thing. 3D outdoor 360 degree panoramas to far horizons, with surround sound emanating from cascading waterfalls Rather than growth just for the sake of growth, expansion of our or the rhythmic beat of drums. Our rock climbing takes place up business is driven by the demand from guests, past and new, who real cliffs. Our version of an ‘adventure club’ includes exploration in enjoy our approach and seek stimulating adventures exploring Zodiacs up rivers, looking for crocodiles or exploring World War II paths less travelled. So, in 2012 we are proud to be offering sites, and our thousands of kilometres of Aquarium features some 74 voyages to 17 countries and 174 often-remote destinations, of the best expanses of coral and marine-life epicentres on this many exclusive to Orion. planet. With us your senses are stimulated by the warmth of sun on your neck, the hint of eucalyptus on the breeze, looking deep into If our spirit of adventure appeals to you, along with the comforts the eyes of an orangutan or sharing a smile with a shy child in a of fine dining and unobtrusive service, spacious accommodation remote village surrounded by dense jungle.
    [Show full text]