DOCSLIB.ORG

To View Asset

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
To View Asset Managing Our Heritage a review of heritage place management in Victoria Heritage Council Victoria June 2003 ii Managing Our Heritage A Victoria Heritage Council project, Melbourne, June 2003 Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication Copyright Heritage Council Victoria ISBN 1 74106 614 X ii iii Preface This report is the result of sustained cooperative endeavour by all the members of the Committee. Special contributions were made by Jo Brownlee, who wrote the section on DSE; Ray Supple, who wrote the Section on Parks Victoria; and Stephen Hare, who wrote the Section on the National Trust. Ray Supple and Stephen Hare also contributed passages now contained in other sections. The format of the case studies was substantially the work of Jo Brownlee and Tim Hubbard. Ray Tonkin and Paul Roser wrote significant parts of the report. Jan Schapper wrote the section on universities and co-edited the whole report. During the course of writing this report, a restructure of government departments has occurred, and both Heritage Victoria and heritage-related sections of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment are now part of the Department of Sustainability and Environment. The editors would like to thank all who contributed to the report for their participation in this new approach to heritage place management in Victoria. John Dwyer Jan Schapper Co-editors iii iv Managing Our Heritage The Heritage Council’s Heritage Place Management Committee The function of the Heritage Place Management Committee is to inquire into heritage place management in Victoria. Committee members Mr John Dwyer QC, Heritage Council (Chair) Ms Jo Brownlee, Crown Land Management, Department of Natural Resources and Environment Mr Stephen Hare, Chief Executive Officer, National Trust of Australia (Victoria) Mr Timothy Hubbard, Heritage Council Ms Amanda Martin, Parks Victoria (to September 2002) Dr Jan Schapper, Heritage Council Mr Ray Supple, Parks Victoria (from September 2002) Mr Ray Tonkin, Executive Director Heritage Victoria Staff Mr Paul Roser, Heritage Victoria Inquiries about the Committee may be directed to: Place Management Committee, Heritage Council Level 22 80 Collins Street MELBOURNE VICTORIA 3000 Telephone: (03) 9655 6519 Facsimile: (03) 9655 9720 iv v Executive summary The genesis of this report was a media campaign conducted by the National Trust in 2001, which drew attention to the financial difficulties and other problems that the Trust was experiencing in managing its portfolio of heritage places on behalf of the community. It was considered that the matters highlighted by the National Trust should not be considered in isolation, and that it would be preferable to consider the state of heritage place management generally. On advice from the Heritage Council, the Minister for Planning established a Committee of the Heritage Council with representatives of relevant stakeholders to examine the State’s portfolio of heritage places open to the public and the management of them, to investigate the market for such places, and to advise as to options for the future. The Committee consisted of representatives of the Heritage Council and Heritage Victoria, Parks Victoria, the Department of Natural Resources and Environment (subsequently Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE), and the National Trust. The terms of reference adopted by the Committee are set out on page ix. The underlying premise of the investigation and the recommendations of the report is the vision for heritage in 2005 as stated in the Victorian Heritage Strategy: ‘Victoria’s diverse cultural heritage will be recognised as a key resource of the State, and will be managed in a sustainable way to maximise benefits for the whole community.’ Unless the state of affairs revealed by the report is addressed, the Government may not achieve its objective to manage in a sustainable way Victoria’s cultural heritage so as to maximise benefits for the whole community. Sustainable management requires a good understanding of what is to be managed so that resources may be appropriately marshalled and applied using a coordinated approach. The government needs to be well informed about the extent and condition of the heritage places in Victoria and what is required to conserve them. Government’s first role is leadership; to set an example in the sustainable management of its own heritage places and by its dealings with the heritage places in its property portfolio, and by adopting policies that actively discourage heritage places from falling into disuse. Government has a responsibility to adopt strategies which avoid redundancy and facilitate sustainable reuse of heritage places. The Committee has gathered a great deal of information about heritage places. A database of about 460 places was compiled. This was complemented by a Parks Victoria database containing 167 places selected from its Historic Places Inventory of 2500 places. DSE reported a portfolio of over 7000 known historic places on Crown Land. Faces with these numbers, the Committee was not able to give a complete account of the quantity and condition of heritage places in Victoria. The full extent of the portfolio was not able to be determined, but a representative sample comprised of the major part was obtained. Although there was material before the Committee to show that there was a backlog of essential maintenance of heritage places, with estimates that millions of v vi Managing Our Heritage dollars were required, the Committee did not attempt to assess the overall condition of heritage places in general or the particular needs of any place. For the government to be fully informed more work needs to be done. For the government to be able to monitor the degree to which sustainable management of heritage places is being achieved, the work of the Committee should be continued and extended. This is the Committee’s first recommendation. There is at present no body or organisation that is appropriately resourced to carry out this work. The Committee suggests that an effective way to ensure that the government is provided with the appropriate information and advice would be to establish a Committee of the Heritage Council to advise the government on the development of an overall plan for achieving sustainable management of heritage places in Victoria. The proposed Committee should be chartered to: • Continue the work of this review in monitoring the extent, conservation and performance of publicly presented heritage places. • Advise government on the current position from time to time as to the conservation and presentation of heritage places. • Develop a strategic direction for presentation and resourcing of publicly accessible heritage places. • Advise on proposals for government acquisition of heritage places. • Advise government on strategies to avoid redundancy and to facilitate re-use of heritage places. • Establish a coordinated management environment for heritage places presented to the public. • Investigate the experience of managing heritage places in England, the USA and elsewhere, and in particular the factors which have made heritage management in England sustainable. • Develop criteria for measuring the extent to which sustainable management of heritage places is being achieved. • Review progress in achieving sustainable management of heritage places. • Develop community awareness and education programs on the steps being taken to achieve sustainable management of Victoria’s heritage places, and run awards programs to encourage sustainable management and innovative presentation of heritage places The Committee should consist of persons appointed from nominees of departments, local government authorities, community organizations and owners of heritage places. It could be called the Heritage Places Advisory Committee. This report recommends that a Heritage Places Advisory Committee be established and provided with the resources required to carry out its functions. The findings of the Committee have implications for all managers of heritage places and, in particular, for government agencies such as DSE and Parks Victoria, and the National Trust. There may need to be some rationalisation of the portfolio, involving priority-setting within the public sector and the moving of some assets to the private sector, with appropriate protection such as covenanting. Heritage conservation does not depend on public ownership, and may even be impeded by it. All stakeholders agree that a coordinated and cooperative approach is required to address problems that apply to heritage places generally. There is a need for a body to carry out this function. This report recommends that this function be performed by the Heritage Places Advisory Committee. Key findings of the Committee relate to the funding required for the sustainable management of heritage places. The heritage place portfolio is a valuable asset for Victoria that benefits the economy of the State. Extra funding is needed at this critical time so as not to lose the resource before it is appropriately used and appreciated. In vi vii relation to government funding, there is no overall plan for the allocation of funding for the conservation and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Yarra Residential Heritage Policy Review
    City of Yarra Residential Heritage Policy Review REVISED REPORT 31 October 2019 Prepared for City of Yarra © Context 2018 [GML Heritage Victoria Pty Ltd, trading as Context. ABN 31 620 754 761] Project Team: Louise Honman Vicki McLean Claire Scott, Claire Scott Planning Revised by: Louise Honman Report Register This report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled City of Yarra Input to Residential Heritage Policy undertaken by Context in accordance with our internal quality management system. Project Issue Notes/description Issue Issued to No. No. Date 2220 1 Draft Stage 1report 9 February Amanda Haycox 2018 2220 2 Draft Stage 2 report 21 Amanda Haycox February 2018 2220 3 Draft final report 28 Amanda Haycox February 2018 2491 4 Revised report 31 October Amanda Haycox 2019 ii CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Scope 1 1.2 Method 1 Project brief 2 Limitations 2 1.3 Stage 1 report 3 Summary 3 How can ‘visibility’ be determined? 3 How does building typology affect ‘visibility’? 4 2.0 INPUT TO HERITAGE POLICY 5 2.1 Demolition 5 What is the issue? 5 Policy intention 5 Key content 6 2.2 Subdivision 7 What is the issue? 7 Policy intention 7 Key content 7 2.3 Alterations and additions 8 What is the issue? 8 Policy intention 9 Key content 14 2.4 New buildings 14 What is the issue? 14 Policy intention 15 Key content 15 REFERENCES 17 APPENDICES 18 iv RESIDENTIAL HERITAGE POLICY REVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report has been revised in October 2019 following key changes in Victorian Planning Schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • North West Area Mental Health Service Hume Moreland Community Mental Health Profile 2015
    No Health Without Mental Health (World Health Organisation 2008) North West Area Mental Health Service Hume Moreland Community Mental Health Profile 2015 Compiled by Doris Sant Population Health & Community Partnerships Coordinator North West Area Mental Health Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital [email protected] Tel: 8371 9806 1 ‘Many people who experience mental illness do not seek treatment or support which can jeopardise their health and wellbeing. People who live with mental illness are at a much greater risk of social and economic disadvantage, deprivation and poorer physical health, and have a lower life expectancy… they are also more likely to be unemployed, homeless, to have contact with the criminal justice system, and to miss out on treatment for physical health problems’ (Department of Health and Human Services (Victoria), 2015 Mental Health 10-year Plan) 2 NWAMHS Community Mental Health Profile 2016 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY __________________________________________________ 5 CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION_____________________________________________ 6 PURPOSE ____________________________________________________________________________ 6 POLICY CONTEXT ____________________________________________________________________ 6 SERVICE DESCRIPTION ______________________________________________________________ 7 WHY MENTAL HEALTH MATTERS _____________________________________________________ 8 KEY DEFINITIONS ____________________________________________________________________ 8 MENTAL HEALTH INDICATORS ______________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Domain Parklands Master Plan 2019-2039 a City That Cares for the Environment
    DOMAIN PARKLANDS MASTER PLAN 2019-2039 A CITY THAT CARES FOR THE ENVIRONMENT Environmental sustainability is the basis of all Future Melbourne goals. It requires current generations to choose how they meet their needs without compromising the ability of future generations to be able to do the same. Acknowledgement of Traditional Owners The City of Melbourne respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, the Boon Wurrung and Woiwurrung (Wurundjeri) people of the Kulin Nation and pays respect to their Elders, past and present. For the Kulin Nation, Melbourne has always been an important meeting place for events of social, educational, sporting and cultural significance. Today we are proud to say that Melbourne is a significant gathering place for all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. melbourne.vic.gov.au CONTENTS A City That Cares For Its Environment 2 4. Master Plan Themes 23 1. Overview 5 4.1 Nurture a diverse landscape and parkland ecology 23 1.1 Why do we need a master plan? 6 4.2 Acknowledge history and cultural heritage 24 1.2 Vision 7 4.3 Support exceptional visitor experience 28 1.3 Domain Parklands Master Plan Snapshot 8 4.4 Improve people movement and access 32 1.4 Preparation of the master plan 9 4.5 Management and partnerships to build resilience 39 1.5 Community and Stakeholder engagement 10 5. Domain Parklands Precincts Plans 41 2. Domain Parklands 11 5.1 Precinct 1 - Alexandra and Queen Victoria Gardens 42 2.1 The history of the site 11 5.2 Precinct 2 - Kings Domain 43 2.2 The Domain Parklands today 12 5.3 Precinct 3 - Yarra Frontage and Government House 44 2.3 Strategic context and influences 12 5.4 Precinct 4 - Visitor Precinct 45 2.4 Landscape Characters 14 5.5 Precinct 5 - Kings Domain South 46 2.5 Land management and status 15 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Moreland History Publications Books
    MORELAND HISTORY PUBLICATIONS Some with notes. This list is a work in progress and should not be considered comprehensive. Last updated: 17 December 2012. Most of the following publications can be consulted at Moreland Libraries http://www.moreland.vic.gov.au/moreland-libraries.html Contents: Books Theses Periodicals Newspapers Heritage studies BOOKS Arranged in order of publication, earliest first. Jubilee history of Brunswick : and illustrated handbook of Brunswick and Coburg F.G. Miles Contributor(s): R. A Vivian ; Publisher: Melbourne : Periodicals Publishing Company Date(s): 1907 Description: 119p. : ill., ports. ; 29cm (photocopy). Subjects: City of Moreland, Brunswick (Vic.), Coburg (Vic.) Location: Brunswick Library history room 994.51 JUB Location: Coburg Library history room 994.51 MEL An index concerning the history of Brunswick No author or date. ‘This is an index of persons and subject names concerning the history of Brunswick. The index is based on the “Jubilee history of Brunswick” 1907.’ Location: Brunswick Library history room 994 INDE (SEE ALSO Index of the Jubilee history of Brunswick 1907 prepared by Merle Ellen Stevens 1979) Reports on Coburg Council meetings in local newspapers Oct 1912 to December 1915 No publication date so entered under publication of newspaper. Location: Coburg Library history room 352.09451 REP The City of Coburg : the inception of a new city : 1850-1922. Description [43 leaves] : ill., maps ; 30 cm. Subjects Coburg (Vic.) --History. Location: Coburg Library history room 994.51 CIT Coburg centenary 1839-1939, official souvenir: celebrations August - October, 1939 Walter Mitchell Coburg, Vic : Coburg City Council, 1939. 24 p. : ill., portraits, pbk ; 25 cm.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet Your New Council Glass Half Full
    Greater Bendigo December 2020 Dine out!Glass half full Meet your new Council CONTENTS NEWS 4 'Tis the season to go swimming 5 Meet your new Council 8 A rewarding opportunity A new chapter begins 9 Working for Victoria, works for Greater Bendigo GB quiz! BUSINESS 10 Dine outdoors 12 To market, to market 13 Highlighting the benefits of hiring people with disability The success of your new home business is only a phone call away! COMMUNITY 14 Glass half full 16 Showcasing gratitude 17 Community spirit shines through COVID-19 projects 18 Surviving summer Is your summer emergency plan right to go? 19 Free green waste disposal Where to go as a last resort when bushfire Greater Bendigo 17 December 2020 threatens 16 Glass half full Dine out! 20 New plan to advance reconciliation Meet your new Council Video a love song to Bendigo 21 Libraries bringing people together A new dog park for Heathcote 22 Golden Square - what's not to love! 3 for free! 24 Bendigo and Maubisse - an enduring friendship since 2006 SERVICES 25 Seeing the bigger picture 26 Tips to reduce your waste this Christmas 27 What's in the works? 27 City to extend organics collections in 2021 ON THE COVER: Bendigo locals Jude and Rebecca Apokis enjoy outdoor dining at Ms Batterhams. PayStay parking now available throughout city Read more on page 10-11. centre 27 ACTIVE AND HEALTHY 29 Why you can't dig on Crown land Helping fitness groups and businesses to train 23 outdoors 30 Making healthy eating easy Local food systems LIFESTYLE 31 Greater Bendigo Great Bakery Trail 32 What I did Last Week 34 When one door closes, another opens 35 Merry Christmas COVID-19 DISCLAIMER GB Magazine was prepared by the City using all reasonable steps to ensure the safety of participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020
    Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020 Version: 1.1 Date approved: 22 December 2015 Reviewed: 15 January 2019 Responsible Department: Planning Related policies: Nil 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................. 3 2 Definitions ............................................................................................................. 3 3 Acronyms .............................................................................................................. 5 4 Scope .................................................................................................................... 5 5 Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 5 6 Gambling and EGMs in the City of Casey ........................................................... 6 7 City of Casey Position on Electronic Gaming Machines ................................... 7 7.1 Advocacy & Partnerships ....................................................................................... 7 7.2 Local Economy ....................................................................................................... 8 7.3 Consultation & Information Provision ...................................................................... 9 7.4 Community Wellbeing ............................................................................................ 9 7.5 Planning Assessment ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 7.5. Final Outcomes of 2020 General Valuation
    Council Meeting Agenda 24/08/2020 7.5 Final outcomes of 2020 General Valuation Abstract This report provides detailed information in relation to the 2020 general valuation of all rateable property and recommends a Council resolution to receive the 1 January 2020 General Valuation in accordance with section 7AF of the Valuation of Land Act 1960. The overall movement in property valuations is as follows: Site Value Capital Improved Net Annual Value Value 2019 Valuations $82,606,592,900 $112,931,834,000 $5,713,810,200 2020 Valuations $86,992,773,300 $116,769,664,000 $5,904,236,100 Change $4,386,180,400 $3,837,830,000 $190,425,800 % Difference 5.31% 3.40% 3.33% The level of value date is 1 January 2020 and the new valuation came into effect from 1 July 2020 and is being used for apportioning rates for the 2020/21 financial year. The general valuation impacts the distribution of rating liability across the municipality. It does not provide Council with any additional revenue. The distribution of rates is affected each general valuation by the movement in the various property classes. The important point from an equity consideration is that all properties must be valued at a common date (i.e. 1 January 2020), so that all are affected by the same market. Large shifts in an individual property’s rate liability only occurs when there are large movements either in the value of a property category (e.g. residential, office, shops, industrial) or the value of certain locations, which are outside the general movements in value across all categories or locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Influences of German Science and Scientists on Melbourne Observatory
    CSIRO Publishing The Royal Society of Victoria, 127, 43–58, 2015 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/rs 10.1071/RS15004 INFLUENCES OF GERMAN SCIENCE AND SCIENTISTS ON MELBOURNE OBSERVATORY Barry a.J. Clark Astronomical Society of Victoria Inc. PO Box 1059, GPO Melbourne 3001 Correspondence: Barry Clark, [email protected] ABSTRACT: The multidisciplinary approach of Alexander von Humboldt in scientific studies of the natural world in the first half of the nineteenth century gained early and lasting acclaim. Later, given the broad scientific interests of colonial Victoria’s first Government Astronomer Robert Ellery, one could expect to find some evidence of the Humboldtian approach in the operations of Williamstown Observatory and its successor, Melbourne Observatory. On examination, and without discounting the importance of other international scientific contributions, it appears that Melbourne Observatory was indeed substantially influenced from afar by Humboldt and other German scientists, and in person by Georg Neumayer in particular. Some of the ways in which these influences acted are obvious but others are less so. Like the other Australian state observatories, in its later years Melbourne Observatory had to concentrate its diminishing resources on positional astronomy and timekeeping. Along with Sydney Observatory, it has survived almost intact to become a heritage treasure, perpetuating appreciation of its formative influences. Keywords: Melbourne Observatory, 19th century, Neumayer, German science The pioneering holistic approach of Alexander von (Geoscience Australia 2015). In 1838 Carl Friedrich Gauss Humboldt in his scientific expeditions to study the natural helped put Humboldt’s call into practice by setting up world had a substantial, lasting and international influence the Göttinger Magnetische Verein (Göttingen Magnetic on a broad range of scientific fields.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of GREATER BENDIGO COVID-19 RELIEF and RECOVERY PLAN WORKING DRAFT V17.0 2 October 2020
    CITY OF GREATER BENDIGO COVID-19 RELIEF AND RECOVERY PLAN WORKING DRAFT V17.0 2 October 2020 VERSION CONTROL Version Date Description Author 1.0 6 April 2020 First Draft Frances Ford 2.0 13 April 2020 Second Draft Frances Ford 3.0 15 April 2020 Third Draft Vicky Mason 4.0 17 April 2020 Fourth Draft Steven Abbott 5.0 17 April 2020 Fifth Draft Working Group 6.0 30 April 2020 Sixth Draft Frances Ford 7.0 15 May 2020 Seventh Draft Frances Ford 8.0 29 May 2020 Eighth Draft Frances Ford 9.0 12 June 2020 Ninth Draft Frances Ford 10.0 26 June 2020 Tenth Draft Frances Ford 11.0 10 July 2020 Eleventh Draft Brigitte Aylett 12.0 24 July 2020 Twelfth Draft Frances Ford 13.0 7 August 2020 Thirteenth Draft Frances Ford 14.0 21 August 2020 Fourteenth Draft Frances Ford 15.0 4 September 2020 Fifteenth Draft Frances Ford 16.0 18 September 2020 Sixteenth Draft Frances Ford 17.0 2 October 2020 Seventeenth Draft Frances Ford DOCUMENT APPROVAL Name Title Date WORKING DRAFT V 17.0 2 October 2020 City of Greater Bendigo COVID-19 Relief and Recovery Plan 1 Table of Contents AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Precincts: History and Significance
    MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 1 The City of Melbourne 5 Background History 5 City of Melbourne Summary Statement of Significance 11 2. Carlton Heritage Precinct 13 Background History 13 Statement of Significance for Carlton Heritage Precinct 16 3. East Melbourne Heritage Precinct including Jolimont and the Parliamentary Precinct 19 Background History 19 0 Statement of Significance for East Melbourne Heritage Precinct including Jolimont and the Parliamentary Precinct 22 4. Kensington & Flour Milling Heritage Precinct 27 Background History 27 Statement of Significance for Kensington & Flour Milling Heritage Precinct 29 5. North & West Melbourne Heritage Precinct 31 Background History 31 Statement of Significance for North & West Melbourne Heritage Precinct 34 6. Parkville Heritage Precinct 37 Background History 37 Statement of Significance for Perky'Ile Heritage Precinct 40 7. South Yarra Heritage Precinct 43 Background History 43 Statement of Significance for South Yarra Heritage Precinct 46 8. Bank Place Heritage Precinct 50 Background History 50 Statement of Significance for Bank Place Heritage Precinct 52 9. Bourke Hill Heritage Precinct 54 Background History 54 Statement of Significance for Bourke Hill Heritage Precinct 56 10. Collins Street East Heritage Precinct59 Background History 59 Statement of Significance for Collins Street East Heritage Precinct 61 REFERENCE DOCUMENT - PAGE 2 OF 94 MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME 11. Flinders Lane Heritage Precinct 64 Background History 64 Statement of Significance for Flinders Lane Heritage Precinct 65 12. Flinders Street Heritage Precinct 68 Background History 68 Statement of Significance for Flinders Street Heritage Precinct 69 13. Guildford Lane Heritage Precinct 72 Background History 72 Statement of Significance for Guildford Lane Heritage Precinct 73 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Bendigo Events Planning Guide 2020-2022
    Bendigo Events Planning Guide 2020-2022 Your guide to planning a successful event in Greater Bendigo Contents About Greater Bendigo 3 Introducing Greater Bendigo 4 How we can help 7 Venues and accommodation 8 Attractions 21 Event support 22 Transport 25 Day trips from Bendigo 26 Map of central Bendigo 27 Acknowledgement of country The City of Greater Bendigo is on Dja Dja Wurrung and Taungurung Country. We acknowledge and extend our appreciation to the Dja Dja Wurrung and Taungurung People, the Traditional Owners of the land. We pay our respects to leaders and Elders past, present and emerging for they hold the memories, the traditions, the culture and the hopes of all Dja Dja Wurrung and Taungurung Peoples. We express our gratitude in the sharing of this land, our sorrow for the personal, spiritual and cultural costs of that sharing and our hope that we may walk forward together in harmony and in the spirit of healing. 2 Bendigo Events Planning Guide 2020-2022 About Greater Bendigo Greater Bendigo a thriving regional city, with an established reputation as a hub for arts and culture, various cultural and sporting events and beautiful gold rush heritage. Bendigo is one of Australia’s largest inland cities, supporting a local population of 118,000 and regional population of more than 240,000.1 Bendigo is a service hub for central Victoria, for health services, higher education, business and transport. Located just two hours from Melbourne by road or train, a 90-minute drive from Melbourne Airport, Bendigo’s own airport also offers direct flights to and from Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigo Shire Heritage Study Volume 1 Part 2 Strategy & Appendices
    Front door, Olive Hills TK photograph 2000 INDIGO SHIRE HERITAGE STUDY VOLUME 1 PART 2 STRATEGY & APPENDICES PREPARED FOR THE INDIGO SHIRE COUNCIL PETER FREEMAN PTY LTD CONSERVATION ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS • CANBERRA CONSULTANT TEAM FINAL AUGUST 2000 INDIGO SHIRE HERITAGE STUDY CONTENTS VOLUME 1 PART 2 STRATEGY & APPENDICES 8.0 A HERITAGE STRATEGY FOR THE SHIRE 8.1 Heritage Conservation Objectives 190 8.2 A Heritage Strategy 190 8.3 The Nature of the Heritage Resources of the Shire 191 8.4 Planning and Management Context 194 8.5 Clause 22 Heritage Policies 196 8.6 Financial Support for Heritage Objectives 197 8.7 Fostering Community Support for Heritage Conservation 198 8.8 A Community Strategy 199 8.9 Implementing the Heritage Strategy 200 APPENDIX A Indigo Shire Heritage Study Brief APPENDIX B Select Bibliography APPENDIX C Historical photographs in major public collections APPENDIX D Glossary of mining terminology APPENDIX E Statutory Controls APPENDIX F Indigo Planning Scheme - Clause 43.01 APPENDIX C Economic Evaluation of the Government Heritage Restoration Program [Extract from report] APPENDIX H Planning Strategy and Policy - Heritage APPENDIX I Recommendations for inclusion within the RNE, the Heritage Victoria Register and the Indigo Shire Planning Scheme APPENDIX J Schedule of items not to be included in the Indigo Shire Planning Scheme APPENDIX K Inventory index by locality/number APPENDIX L Inventory index by site type i SECTION 8.0 A HERITAGE STRATEGY FOR THE SHIRE 8.1 Heritage Conservation Objectives 190 8.2 A Heritage Strategy
    [Show full text]