SL04 Funding Year 1999 Disbursments to Service Providers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SL04 Funding Year 1999 Disbursments to Service Providers Universal Service Administrative Company Appendix SL04 Schools and Libraries 4Q2013 Funding Year 1999 Disbursements - 2Q2013 Page 1 of 64 SPIN # Provider Type Service Provider Total Form 474 SPIF Total Form 472 BEAR Total Payments 143000003 CAP Global Crossing Local Services, Inc. 0.00 65.65 65.65 143000012 CAP Time Warner Communications of Charlotte L.P. 0.00 38,114.12 38,114.12 143000013 CAP Cox Virginia Telcom, Inc. 620,499.19 0.00 620,499.19 143000013 CAP Cox Virginia Telcom, Inc. dba Cox Business Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 143000014 CAP Cox California Telcom, Inc. 0.00 561.60 561.60 143000026 CAP Time Warner Telecom of Texas, LP 0.00 220,320.00 220,320.00 143000029 CAP Time Warner AxS of New York City L.P. 0.00 95,296.32 95,296.32 143000042 CAP KMC Telecom Inc. 0.00 42,706.88 42,706.88 143000059 CAP Time Warner AXS of California LP 0.00 10,281.93 10,281.93 143000061 CAP Time Warner Telecom of Indiana, L.P. 0.00 60,753.18 60,753.18 143000067 CAP AT&T dba Teleport Communications Group, Inc. 320,400.00 1,075,183.51 1,395,583.51 143000067 CAP Teleport Communications Group, Inc. 0.00 969.90 969.90 143000069 CAP R & B Network, Inc. 0.00 34,608.00 34,608.00 143000070 CAP Pac-West Telecomm., Inc. 0.00 148.00 148.00 143000071 CAP ICG Telecom Group, Inc. 25,571.38 8,397.90 33,969.28 143000072 CAP Cablevision Lightpath, Inc. 328,517.76 582,015.22 910,532.98 143000072 CAP Cablevision Lightpath 0.00 46,798.80 46,798.80 143000074 CAP McLeod USA Telecommunications Services, Inc. 599,532.05 223,586.70 823,118.75 143000079 CAP Time Warner Communications of Mid South, L.P. 0.00 1,968.00 1,968.00 143000083 CAP Peco Hyperion Telecommunications 0.00 8,325.04 8,325.04 143000086 CAP Adelphia Business Solutions of VT,Inc fkaHyperion Telecom-VT 0.00 7,115.09 7,115.09 143000086 CAP Hyperion Telecommunications of Vermont 0.00 1,932.31 1,932.31 143000093 CAP Nextlink Washington, Inc. 60,522.47 29,922.70 90,445.17 143000093 CAP XO Washington, Inc. 1,328.46 0.00 1,328.46 143000095 CAP XO Pennsylvania, LP 0.00 0.00 0.00 143000095 CAP Nextlink Pennsylvania, LP 35,513.24 15,452.37 50,965.61 143000106 CAP GST Telecom Washington, Inc. 0.00 49,910.87 49,910.87 143000110 CAP GST Telecom California, Inc. 0.00 124,939.28 124,939.28 143000111 CAP Nextlink Tennessee, Inc. 0.00 7,181.22 7,181.22 143000111 CAP XO Tennessee, Inc. 0.00 133,351.41 133,351.41 143000114 CAP XO Ohio, Inc. 0.00 1,787.80 1,787.80 143000114 CAP Nextlink Ohio, Inc. 25,596.95 19,610.65 45,207.60 143000125 CAP Time Warner Communications of Milwaukee, L.P. 0.00 1,705.44 1,705.44 143000131 CAP Electric Lightwave, Inc. 0.00 51,161.20 51,161.20 143000132 CAP Qwest Interprise America, Inc. fka US West Interprise Americ 0.00 136,383.51 136,383.51 143000132 CAP U S West Interprise America, Inc. 191,919.77 2,415,389.63 2,607,309.40 143000132 CAP Interprise (97.38) 221,144.44 221,047.06 143000132 CAP Interprise America, Inc. 1,180.04 188,605.18 189,785.22 143000297 CAP Connecticut Telephone & Communication Systems 0.00 2,484.00 2,484.00 143001100 CAP North American Communications, Inc. 0.00 84,182.77 84,182.77 143001102 CAP TCA Communications 138,847.00 30,787.50 169,634.50 143001107 CAP Minnesota Independent Interexchange Corp. 337,426.08 2,880,087.71 3,217,513.79 143001107 CAP Onvoy, Inc. 0.00 901,507.20 901,507.20 143001133 CAP LDD, Inc. 15,039.33 35,193.85 50,233.18 143001133 CAP Big River Telephone Company LLC 0.00 599.97 599.97 143001144 CAP CapRock Commuications Corporation 0.00 5,917.27 5,917.27 143001153 CAP Access Communications Inc.-Access Communications 0.00 26,441.82 26,441.82 143001153 CAP McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. 0.00 2,376.00 2,376.00 143001158 CAP USLink, Inc. 487,162.23 11,357.34 498,519.57 143001167 CAP United Communications Inc. d.b.a. UNICOM 69,679.66 4,609.55 74,289.21 143001173 CAP NTS Communications, Inc. 178,812.13 66,360.89 245,173.02 143001175 CAP Norlight Telecommunications, Inc. 0.00 13,382.54 13,382.54 143001179 CAP Midcontinent Communications, Inc. 21,097.80 161,291.02 182,388.82 143001182 CAP Wright Businesses, Inc. 0.00 1,412.38 1,412.38 143001182 CAP Community Telephone Corporation 0.00 66,731.04 66,731.04 143001194 CAP ITC (DBA NEXTLINK Affinity) 0.00 7,526.10 7,526.10 143001196 CAP Delta Comm., Inc. 0.00 4,339.58 4,339.58 143001196 CAP ITC DeltaCom Communications, Inc. 0.00 33,925.52 33,925.52 143001208 CAP Business Telecom, Inc. 35,659.09 12,347.80 48,006.89 143001236 CAP First Communications, LLC 0.00 4,192.56 4,192.56 143001261 CAP W. T. Services, Incorporated 17,712.00 0.00 17,712.00 143001892 CAP Metamora Tel. Co. 0.00 8,586.82 8,586.82 143001998 CAP Montezuma Mutual Tel. Co. 1,232.91 880.65 2,113.56 143002453 CAP Santa Rosa Telephone Cooperative, Inc. 0.00 10,780.34 10,780.34 143002897 CAP Cox Florida Telcom, L.P. 0.00 72,683.19 72,683.19 143002998 CAP Minnesota Independent Equal Access Corporation 0.00 0.00 0.00 143003000 CAP Westel, Inc. 0.00 34,000.49 34,000.49 143003353 CAP TeleBeam, Incorporated 0.00 11,701.79 11,701.79 143003814 CAP CFW Network, Inc. 0.00 5,587.26 5,587.26 143003845 CAP Minnesota Power Telecom, Inc. 0.00 2,417.08 2,417.08 143003874 CAP Frontier Telemanagement, Inc. 0.00 1,740.64 1,740.64 143003877 CAP Cooperative Communications, Inc. 0.00 9,768.00 9,768.00 143003900 CAP Conestoga Communications, Inc. 0.00 11,700.29 11,700.29 143003926 CAP Telecon Communication Corp. 38,361.80 34,352.01 72,713.81 143003933 CAP SouthEast Telephone Inc. 0.00 27,856.13 27,856.13 143004000 CAP Partner Communications Group, LLC 34,781.52 763.20 35,544.72 143004049 CAP TEL-Save, Inc. 0.00 813.83 813.83 143004049 CAP Talk.com Holding Corp. 0.00 15,210.29 15,210.29 143004093 CAP Popp Telcom Incorporated 12,598.28 7,537.20 20,135.48 143004191 CAP CTC Communications Corp. 282,500.78 253,171.20 535,671.98 143004256 CAP Matrix Telecom, Inc. 0.00 8,494.58 8,494.58 143004268 CAP RCN Telecom Services of New York, Inc. 4,561.75 45,790.49 50,352.24 143004277 CAP A.R.C. Networks, Inc. 481,748.11 180,863.79 662,611.90 143004340 CAP Dell Marketing LP 7,823,304.37 3,096,880.79 10,920,185.16 143004425 CAP LIG Holdings dba EarthStation Internet 24,960.00 7,284.00 32,244.00 143004441 CAP PenTeleData Limited Partnership I. 212,514.72 223,381.13 435,895.85 143004452 CAP Mid-Hudson Communications Inc. 1,815.48 24,337.55 26,153.03 143004466 CAP McLeodUSA 185,582.10 9,242.60 194,824.70 143004480 CAP Consolidated Communications Network, Inc. 20.89 91.89 112.78 143004508 CAP F&S Fiber Systems LLC 66,298.75 6,975.00 73,273.75 143004514 CAP AppliedTheory Communications, Inc. 353,551.58 638,402.73 991,954.31 143004559 CAP Service Electric Cable T.V., Inc. 60,320.00 25,278.00 85,598.00 USAC - Schools and Libraries Support Mechanism August 02, 2013 Universal Service Administrative Company Appendix SL04 Schools and Libraries 4Q2013 Funding Year 1999 Disbursements - 2Q2013 Page 2 of 64 143004672 CAP Alltel Communications Products, Inc. 16,510.74 0.00 16,510.74 143004672 CAP Alltel Supply, Inc. 893,988.48 603,537.09 1,497,525.57 143004710 CAP Aliant Midwest, Inc. dba ALLTEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 143004829 CAP Interpath Communications, Inc. 3,160,199.35 155,551.00 3,315,750.35 143004833 CAP Avista Fiber, Inc 0.00 434,462.50 434,462.50 143004959 CAP Digital Communications of Iowa 0.00 8,210.04 8,210.04 143004959 CAP McLeodUSA Integrated Business Systems 0.00 73,386.20 73,386.20 143005095 CAP WNM Communications Corporation, Inc. 85,312.12 28,723.31 114,035.43 143005109 CAP Sancom, Inc. 0.00 1,355.00 1,355.00 143005118 CAP BestWeb Corporation 0.00 92,196.51 92,196.51 143005134 CAP Dakota Telecom, Inc. 6,266.98 0.00 6,266.98 143005202 CAP LDMI Long Distance, Inc. 0.00 197,327.89 197,327.89 143005290 CAP Buckeye Telesystem, Inc. 0.00 400,722.58 400,722.58 143005305 CAP InfoTel Communications LLC 0.00 59,577.67 59,577.67 143005366 CAP MountaiNet, Inc. 4,848.79 14,854.62 19,703.41 143005375 CAP Ameritech Advanced Data Services, Inc. 15,640,147.59 13,274,565.15 28,914,712.74 143005414 CAP CTC Communications, Inc.
Recommended publications
  • OFC/NFOEC 2011 Program Archive
    OFC/NFOEC 2011 Archive Technical Conference: March 6-10, 2011 Exposition: March 8-10, 2011 Los Angeles Convention Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA At OFC/NFOEC 2011, the optical communications industry was buzzing with the sounds of a larger exhibit hall, expanded programming, product innovations, cutting-edge research presentations, and increased attendance March 6 - 10 in Los Angeles. The exhibit hall grew by 20 percent over last year, featuring new programming for service providers and data center operators, and more exhibitors filling a larger space, alongside its core show floor programs and activities. The more than 500 companies in the exhibition hall showcased innovations in areas such as 100G, tunable XFPs, metro networking, Photonic Integrated Circuits, and more. On hand to demonstrate where the industry is headed were network and test equipment vendors, sub-system and component manufacturers, as well as software, fiber cable and specialty fiber manufacturers. Service providers and enterprises were there to get the latest information on building or upgrading networks or datacenters. OFC/NFOEC also featured expanded program offerings in the areas of high-speed data communications, optical internetworking, wireless backhaul and supercomputing for its 2011 conference and exhibition. This new content and more was featured in standing-room only programs such as the Optical Business Forum, Ethernet Alliance Program, Optical Internetworking Forum Program, Green Touch Panel Session, a special symposium on Meeting the Computercom Challenge and more. Flagship programs Market Watch and the Service Provider Summit also featured topics on data centers, wireless, 100G, and optical networking. Hundreds of educational workshops, short courses, tutorial sessions and invited talks at OFC/NFOEC covered hot topics such as datacom, FTTx/in-home, wireless backhaul, next generation data transfer technology, 100G, coherent, and photonic integration.
    [Show full text]
  • 8000 Plus Magazine Issue 17
    THE BEST SELLIINIG IVI A<3 AZI INI E EOF=t THE AMSTRAD PCW Ten copies ofMin^g/jf^^ Office Professional to be ISSUE 17 • FEBRUARY 1988* £1.50 Could AMS's new desktop publishing package be the best yet? f PLUS: Complete buyer's guide to word processing, accounts, utilities and DTP software jgl- ) MASTERFILE 8000 FOR ALL AMSTRAD PCW COMPUTERS MASTERFILE 8000, the subject of so many Any file can make RELATIONAL references to up enquiries, is now available. to EIGHT read-only keyed files, the linkage being effected purely by the use of matching file and MASTERFILE 8000 is a totally new database data names. product. While drawing on the best features of the CPC versions, it has been designed specifically for You can import/merge ASCII files (e.g. from the PCW range. The resulting combination of MASTERFILE III), or export any data (e.g. to a control and power is a delight to use. word-processor), and merge files. For keyed files this is a true merge, not just an append operation. Other products offer a choice between fast but By virtue of export and re-import you can make a limited-capacity RAM files, and large-capacity but copy of a file in another key sequence. New data cumbersome fixed-length, direct-access disc files. fields can be added at any time. MASTERFILE 8000 and the PCW RAM disc combine to offer high capacity with fast access to File searches combine flexibility with speed. variable-length data. File capacity is limited only (MASTERFILE 8000 usually waits for you, not by the size of your RAM disc.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading International Markets
    Leading International Markets Change (1834-1937) was the pioneer of radio phone exchanges, but this was more that strategic decisions would provide created a wholly owned £1.86 billion INTRODUCTION and a Nobel Prize winner in 1909. It technology-led rather than reflecting a clear direction for GEC’s communi- telecommunications equipment company. The modern business environment was in the same year that he founded changing consumer requirements. cation business. Acquisitions were subsequently made contains many different influences that Marconi SpA, an innovator in civil, to add products from US companies, as In recent years, fewer industries have been faced with The strength of GPT depended on sales make decision-making more complex mobile radio and military telecommu- Acquisition is one way of responding well as US market share. For example, more challenges than the telecom equipment industry. of System X narrowband digital than ever, such as technological nications in Italy and over 60 countries to transformational change and the the Reltec Corporation was acquired in exchanges, primarily to BT. At the Though the industry has been around for more than one change, competitive rivalry and for many years. GPT (GEC Plessey opportunities it creates. This is more 1999 to access new technology and time, sales were effective and provided hundred years, it has changed more in the past few years global communications. The ability Telecoms) had more than 90 years responsive than internal development enable Marconi to expand into cheap connections for voice telecom- to make sense of these influences is experience in the field of telecoms as as it allows organisations to improve the US market.
    [Show full text]
  • Loudspeaker System New Distortion Criterion Liquid Crystals
    Loudspeaker system New distortion criterion Liquid crystals Australia SA1.25 Canada $1.75 Denmark Kr. 11.00 Germany Dm. 4.50 Greece Dr. 47.00 Holland MI. 450 Italy 1100 New Zealand SNZ1.50 Norway Kr.11.00 incl. moms Singapore M 53.25 Spain Ptas. 80 00 LI S A S1 65 www.americanradiohistory.com the difference is that it measures amplitude measure hum, distortion, modulation depth and all against frequency (instead of time). This comparatively sorts of things to an accuracy impossible on a 'scope - small change has led to our instrument being called a even on signals which 'scopes show as being 'pure'. "Spectrum Analyser" which, in turn, has caused oscilloscope users to believe it's for a completely different Our special digital store and television display job, "they are complicated things used only by boffins system gives you a steady 'infinite persistance' picture on and people concerned with light waves or something ". which you may also compare your ideal waveform with your actual live image. The graticule But - excuse us - that's is electronically generated - so no where they're wrong. Our TF 2370 parallax errors - and you can move AMPLITUDE FREQUENCY is easier to use than many it up and down, or sideways, or oscilloscopes, it has a frequency expand it, all at the twist of a knob range from 30 Hz to 110 MHz and or two. gives much, much more information about waveforms of nearly all types Whether you are involved in than does a 'scope. And it has a design, production, calibration, built -in digital frequency meter and maintenance or indeed virtually any sweep (tracking) generator of its application where oscilloscopes are own so you can check amplifiers used, you will find that the TF 2370 and filters too.
    [Show full text]
  • The AGN Ionization Cones of NGC 5728: I-Excitation and Nuclear Structure
    Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 Draft version October 9, 2018 The AGN Ionization Cones of NGC 5728 : I - Excitation and Nuclear Structure Mark Durre´1 and Jeremy Mould1 1Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology, P.O. Box 218, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia ABSTRACT We explore the gas morphology and excitation mechanisms of the ionization cones of the Type II Seyfert galaxy NGC 5728. Near-IR and optical data from the SINFONI and MUSE IFUs on the VLT are combined with HST optical images, Chandra X-ray data and VLA radio observations. The complex nuclear structure has a star-forming (SF) ring with a diameter of 2 kpc. A radio jet impacts on the ISM at about 200 pc from the nucleus, with the SN remnants in the SF ring also present. Emission-line ratios of [Fe II] and H II show heavy extinction towards the nucleus, moderate extinction in the SF ring and reduced extinction in the ionization cones. The AGN is hidden by a dust bar with up to 19 magnitudes of visual extinction; the dust temperature at the nuclear position is ∼ 870 K. An X-ray jet is aligned with the ionization cones, and associated with high-excitation emission lines of [Si VI] in a coronal-line region extending 300 pc from the nucleus. Molecular hydrogen is spatially independent of the cones, concentrated in a disk equatorial to the star-forming ring, but also showing entrainment along the sides of the bicone. Gas masses for warm and cold H2,H I and H II are estimated, and the excitation mechanisms for ionized and molecular gas are elucidated, from both optical (which shows a clean SF-AGN mixing sequence) and infrared diagnostics (which show more complicated, multi-component excitation regimes).
    [Show full text]
  • SYNDICATION Partner with Future OUR PURPOSE
    SYNDICATION Partner With Future OUR PURPOSE We change people’s lives through “sharing our knowledge and expertise with others, making it easy and fun for them to do what they want ” CONTENTS ● The Future Advantage ● Syndication ● Our Portfolio ● Company History THE FUTURE ADVANTAGE Syndication Our award-winning specialist content can be used to further enrich the experience of your audience. Whilst at the same time saving money on editorial costs. We have 4 million+ images and 670,000 articles available for reuse. And with the support of our dedicated in-house licensing team, this content can be seamlessly adapted into a range of formats such as newspapers, magazines, websites and apps. The Core Benefits: ● Internationally transferable content for a global audience ● Saving costs on editorial budget so improving profit margin ● Immediate, automated and hassle-free access to content via our dedicated content delivery system – FELIX – or custom XML feeds ● Friendly, dynamic and forward-thinking licensing team available to discuss editorial requirements #1 ● Rich and diverse range of material to choose from ● Access to exclusive content written by in-house expert editorial teams Monthly Bookazines Global monthly Social Media magazines users Fans 78 2000+ 148m 52m Source: Google Search 2018 SYNDICATION ACCESS the entire Future portfolio of market leading brands within one agreement. Our in context licence gives you the ability to publish any number of features, reviews or interviews to boost the coverage and quality of your publications. News Features Interviews License the latest news from all our Our brands speak to the moovers and area’s of interest from a single shakers within every subject we write column to a Double Page spread.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of GEC/Marconi
    The Effect of Corporate Restructuring on the Shareholders’ Value: The Case of GEC/Marconi Magdy Abdel-Kader1* and Vagia Mentzeniot2 1 Brunel Business School. Brunel University. Uxbridge. Middlesex UB8 3PH. UK * Corresponding author: Tel: +44 (0)1895 266739. Fax: +44 (0)1895 269775. Email: [email protected] 2 Finance Division, Piraeus Bank Group, Headquarters, Stadiou & Amerikis 4, Athens, 10557, Greece Abstract GEC/Marconi’s transformation from a diversified conglomerate to a focused telecommunications and information technology company was an eventful and rambling transmission that resulted in the deterioration of shareholders’ value. It represents one of the most dramatic falls from grace in British corporate history and one of the greatest corporate governance fiascos of all time. The study investigates the wealth effects of Marconi’s sell-offs and acquisitions on its shareholders’ value by calculating the abnormal returns on the announcement days of all the disposals/acquisition during 1996-2002. The results support the view that shareholders’ value increases when a company proceeds to corporate sell-offs to pursue a focus strategy. However, the authors conjecture that GEC/Marconi has destroyed shareholders’ value through these disposals/acquisitions because of several mistakes, such as being prone to heavy debt. © 2007 World Research Organization. All rights reserved Keywords: Marconi, GEC, Restructuring, Disposals, Acquisitions, Divestiture Citation: Abdel-Kader, M. & Metzeniot, V. (2007). The effect of corporate restructuring on the stakeholder’s value: the case of GEC/Marconi. World Journal of Business Management. 1(1) 28-46 Introduction acquired firms rather than acquiring firms. A study by Berger and Ofek (1995) showed that diversification Diversification in the 1950’s and 1960’s gave rise to destroys value.
    [Show full text]
  • ABC Consumer Magazine Concurrent Release - Dec 2007 This Page Is Intentionally Blank Section 1
    December 2007 Industry agreed measurement CONSUMER MAGAZINES CONCURRENT RELEASE This page is intentionally blank Contents Section Contents Page No 01 ABC Top 100 Actively Purchased Magazines (UK/RoI) 05 02 ABC Top 100 Magazines - Total Average Net Circulation/Distribution 09 03 ABC Top 100 Magazines - Total Average Net Circulation/Distribution (UK/RoI) 13 04 ABC Top 100 Magazines - Circulation/Distribution Increases/Decreases (UK/RoI) 17 05 ABC Top 100 Magazines - Actively Purchased Increases/Decreases (UK/RoI) 21 06 ABC Top 100 Magazines - Newstrade and Single Copy Sales (UK/RoI) 25 07 ABC Top 100 Magazines - Single Copy Subscription Sales (UK/RoI) 29 08 ABC Market Sectors - Total Average Net Circulation/Distribution 33 09 ABC Market Sectors - Percentage Change 37 10 ABC Trend Data - Total Average Net Circulation/Distribution by title within Market Sector 41 11 ABC Market Sector Circulation/Distribution Analysis 61 12 ABC Publishers and their Publications 93 13 ABC Alphabetical Title Listing 115 14 ABC Group Certificates Ranked by Total Average Net Circulation/Distribution 131 15 ABC Group Certificates and their Components 133 16 ABC Debut Titles 139 17 ABC Issue Variance Report 143 Notes Magazines Included in this Report Inclusion in this report is optional and includes those magazines which have submitted their circulation/distribution figures by the deadline. Circulation/Distribution In this report no distinction is made between Circulation and Distribution in tables which include a Total Average Net figure. Where the Monitored Free Distribution element of a title’s claimed certified copies is more than 80% of the Total Average Net, a Certificate of Distribution has been issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Afraid of 3D Printing?
    THIS VERSION MAY CONTAIN INACCURATE OR INCOMPLETE PAGE NUMBERS. PLEASE CONSULT THE PRINT OR ONLINE DATABASE VERSIONS FOR THE PROPER CITATION INFORMATION. ARTICLE WHO'S AFRAID OF 3D PRINTING? BEN DEPOORTER* & BREGT RAUS† ABSTRACT Heralded for ushering in a new era of personalized manufacturing, there is a growing fear that consumer 3D printing is the next frontier of massive intellec- tual property infringements. Described as the Napster of patents, illegal 3D printing is foretold to disrupt manufacturing in the same manner as digital piracy unsettled the music industry. This Article shows that the negative forecast of rampant 3D printing piracy is overstated. We explain how the purported analogies between P2P file sharing and consumer 3D printing overlook essential differences between piracy of me- dia content and physical property. We caution against aggressive enforcement against unauthorized consumer 3D printing that would impede innovation and the development of 3D printing technologies. *Max Radin Distinguished Professor - University of California, Hastings Law School; Visit- ing Professor, U.C. Berkeley Law (PLLM); Affiliate Scholar, Stanford Law School. Center for Internet & Society, and EMLE Coordinator, Ugent. †LL.M. Candidate, University of Chicago Law School (BAEF & Fulbright Fellow), 2019; Master of Laws, Ghent University Belgium, 2015. 60 2. DEPOORTER & RAUS.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 4/1/19 10:38 AM 2019] WHO'S AFRAID OF 3D PRINTING? 61 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Blake Library, John F
    M artin C ounty L ibrary S ystem LIBRARY EVENTS library.martin.fl.us STAY INFORMED, INSPIRED, AND CONNECTED MARCH 2017 CHAUTAUQUA SOUTH: CELEBRATING THE HARVEST OF THE MIND, BODY, AND SPIRIT Continuing through April, the Martin County Library System’s four-month arts and education series called Chautauqua South is an eclectic array of artists, authors, storytellers, dramatists, historians, educators and entertainers. Funding for Chautauqua South is provided by the Friends of the Martin County Library System, Inc. Find the Chautauqua icon in our monthly newsletters, or go to our event calendar to view the entire Chautauqua South calendar: http://martin.evanced.info/signup, or call 772.221.1403. PIONEERS, DREAMERS, AND DOERS SERIES: THE WOMEN WHO SHAPED, AND CONTINUED TO MAKE, MARTIN COUNTY HISTORY DON’T MISS IT! Blake Library, John F. and Rita M. Armstrong Wing Thursdays | 6–7pm March 2–Women in Politics March 9–Women in Medicine March 23–Black Women’s Significance in Martin County History March 30–Today’s Women This four-part series looks at March 4, 2017 women throughout Martin County history right up to the 9am–2pm present. Part I of this program Jensen Beach High School was presented last year in March. It focused on the featuring: pioneering women in Martin James Hamblin, If Our Bodies Could Talk: County’s history. This year, Conversational Anatomy Part II will highlight some Dr. Steven Masley, Smart Fat significant “firsts or near firsts” Rumaan Alam, Rich and Pretty for women both historically and in our current Martin County world. Jade Chang, The Wangs vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Case No IV/M.1226 - GEC / GPTH
    EN Case No IV/M.1226 - GEC / GPTH Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/07/1998 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 398M1226 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 27.07.1998 PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION To the notifying party Dear Sirs, Subject: Case No IV/M.1226-GEC/GPTH Notification of 25.06.1998 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No4064/89. 1. On 25.06.1998 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 1 by which the General Electric Company (“GEC”) acquire, within the meaning of Article 3 (1) (b) of Council Regulation 4064/89, control of the whole of GPT Holdings Limited (“GPTH”). 2. After examination of the notification the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 and does not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market or with the functioning of the EEA agreement. 1 OJ L 395, 30.12.1989 p. 1; corrected version OJ L 257 of 21.9.1990, p. 13, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1310/97, OJ L 180, 9.7.1997, p. 1, corrigendum in OJ L 40, 13.2.1998, p. 17. Rue de la Loi 200, B-1049 Bruxelles/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium Telephone: exchange 299.11.11 Telex: COMEU B 21877.
    [Show full text]
  • 3GPP/OP#9 Meeting Ottawa, Canada 2 May 2003 3GPP/OP#9(03)
    3GPP/OP#9 Meeting 3GPP/OP#9(03)08 Ottawa, Canada 4 April 2003 page 1 of 13 2 May 2003 Source: FFG Chairman Title: Year 2003 Budget and Partner Contributions Agenda item: 6.3 Document for: Decision X Discussion Information 1 Year 2003 Budget 1.1 Support Budget The 2003 MCC support budget was discussed and agreed in principle during OP#8 in St Paul de Vence (see report of OP#8 given in OP#8(02)09). The basis for the 2003 was recorded as below: Budget Line 2003 proposed allocation at OP#8 (kEUR) MCC Staff 1000 Additional support staff 150 MCC Contractors 1963 Travel and subsistence 700 Overheads 1784 Contingency 200 Sub Total 5 797 However, it was agreed to reduce the budget given above by a further 250 kEUR. The precise budget lines where further reductions should be made was left for the discretion of the MCC in consultation with FFG, but the aim was to retain the same service level within 3GPP wherever possible. The precise budget line allocations were derived as given in the following tables by FFG and should now be approved by this OP meeting. page 2 of 13 Budget Line 2003 proposed allocation at FFG#10(kEUR) MCC Staff 970 Additional support staff 150 MCC Contractors 1832 Travel and subsistence 680 Overheads 1706 Contingency 200 Sub Total 5 538 The revised support budget proposal given above is derived at Annex A: 1.2 Specific tasks budget The Partners agreed to the following allocation for the continuation of Task 160 (TTCN).
    [Show full text]