GPUS 2020 Presidential Convention Delegate Totals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

GPUS 2020 Presidential Convention Delegate Totals State Green Party # Delegates Accredited or or under (§ 4-2.1) Caucus Caucus Apportionment Alabama Green Alabama 4 Yes Party Green Party of Alaska 4 Yes Alaska Arizona Arizona 6 Yes Green Party Arkansas Green Arkansas 4 Yes Party Green Party of California 43 Yes California Green Party of Colorado 7 Yes Colorado Green Party Connecticut 11 Yes of Connecticut Green Party of Delaware 4 Yes Delaware District of DC Statehood 4 Yes Columbia Green Party Green Party of Florida 9 Yes Florida Georgia Green Georgia 4 Yes Party Green Party of Hawaii 4 Yes Hawaii Idaho Idaho 4 Yes (inactive) Green Party Illinois Illinois 27 Yes Green Party Indiana Green 4 Indiana Party Yes Iowa Iowa 4 Yes Green Party Kansas Green Kansas 4 Yes Party Kentucky Green 4 Kentucky Party Yes Green 4 Louisiana Party Yes of Louisiana Maine Green Maine 12 Yes Independent Party Maryland Green Maryland 8 Yes Party 1 State Green Party # Delegates Accredited or or under (§ 4-2.1) Caucus Caucus Apportionment Green Rainbow 11 Massachusetts Party of Yes Massachusetts Green Party Michigan 15 Yes of Michigan Green Party Minnesota 6 Yes of Minnesota Green Party Mississippi 4 Yes of Mississippi Progressive Party Missouri 7 Yes of Missouri Montana Green Montana 4 Yes Party Nebraska Green Nebraska 4 Yes Party Green Party of Nevada 4 Yes Nevada New Hampshire no state party 4 No Green Party of New Jersey 5 Yes New Jersey Green Party of New Mexico 4 Yes New Mexico Green Party New York 21 Yes of New York State North Carolina North Carolina 4 Yes Green Party North Dakota no state party 4 No Green Party Ohio 7 Yes of Ohio Green Party Oklahoma 4 Yes of Oklahoma Pacific 7 Oregon Green Party Yes of Oregon Green Party of Pennsylvania 11 Yes Pennsylvania Green Party of Rhode Island 4 Yes Rhode Island South Carolina South Carolina 4 Yes Green Party South Dakota no state party 4 No Green Party Tennessee 4 Yes of Tennessee Green Party Texas 26 Yes of Texas 2 State Green Party # Delegates Accredited or or under (§ 4-2.1) Caucus Caucus Apportionment Green Party Utah 4 Yes of Utah Green Party Vermont 4 Yes (inactive) of Vermont Green Party Virginia 5 Yes of Virginia Green Party of Washington 5 Yes Washington State West Virginia West Virginia 5 Yes Mountain Party Wisconsin Green Wisconsin 4 Yes Party Wyoming Green Wyoming 4 Yes (inactive) Party Total states 374 Total states 362 eligible in 2020 Caucus Womens Caucus 4 Yes Lavender Caucus 4 Yes Caucus Caucus Black Caucus 4 Yes Caucus Youth Caucus 4 Yes Caucus Latinx Caucus 4 Yes Total caucuses 20 Guam 2 No Northern 2 No Mariana Islands Puerto Rico 2 No US Virgin 2 No Islands Total territories 8 Total territories 0 eligible in 2020 Total delegates 402 Total delegates 382 eligible in 2020 3.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Application for Accreditation of the Kentucky Green Party As a State Chapter
Application for Accreditation of the Kentucky Green Party as a State Chapter Dear Accreditation Committee (c/o Tamar Yager), Thank you for your help so far in our accreditation process. Here is our updated application to become a state chapter. Our approved bylaws are attached. Criteria for State Party Membership in the Green Party of the United States: 1. Acceptance of the four pillars of the international Green Party movement [ecological wisdom, social justice, grassroots democracy, non-violence] or the Ten Key Values as guiding principles. We accept these pillars and key values, as shown by our incorporation of them in Article 1 of our bylaws, which begins as follows: 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of the Kentucky Green Party (Party) is to transform Kentucky's political and economic systems in ways that move the Commonwealth closer to the realization of our ten key values, which are as follows: 1.1 Grassroots Democracy Every human being deserves a say in the decisions that affect his or her life..." 2. Organized and run in accordance with these values. So far, we have operated in a way that is consistent with the values. We believe that the rest of the provisions of the bylaws show we are committed to continuing to do so. 3. A statewide organization open to, and reflective of, a statewide membership. In the process of organizing to this point, we have been focusing most of our attention on contacting Kentuckians in all parts of the state who are in agreement with the key values expressed in the GP platform.
[Show full text]
American Governmentamerican American Government
American Government American Government Orange Grove Texts Plus seeks to redefine publishing in an electronic world. a joint venture of the University Press of Florida and The Orange Grove, Florida’s digital repository, this collaboration provides faculty, students, and researchers worldwide with the latest scholarship and course materials in a twenty- first-century format that is readily discoverable, easily customizable, and consistently affordable. www.theorangegrove.org Lenz and H Timothy O. Lenz O and Mirya Holman LM a n ISBN 978-1-61610-163-3 American Government University Press of Florida Florida A&M University, Tallahassee Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton Florida Gulf Coast University, Ft. Myers Florida International University, Miami Florida State University, Tallahassee New College of Florida, Sarasota University of Central Florida, Orlando University of Florida, Gainesville University of North Florida, Jacksonville University of South Florida, Tampa University of West Florida, Pensacola orange grove text plus American Government Timothy O. Lenz and Mirya Holman Florida Atlantic University Department of Political Science University Press of Florida Gainesville · Tallahassee · Tampa · Boca Raton Pensacola · Orlando · Miami · Jacksonville · Ft. Myers · Sarasota Copyright 2013 by the Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees on behalf of the Florida Atlantic University Department of Political Science This work is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. You are free to electronically copy, distribute, and transmit this work if you attribute authorship. However, all printing rights are reserved by the University Press of Florida (http:// www.upf.com).
[Show full text]
OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS
OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/08/2016 Source: State Elections Offices* SOURCE: State Elections Offices* STATE ELECTORAL ELECTORAL VOTES CAST FOR ELECTORAL VOTES CAST FOR VOTES JOSEPH R. BIDEN (D) DONALD J. TRUMP (R) AL 9 9 AK 3 3 AZ 11 11 AR 6 6 CA 55 55 CO 9 9 CT 7 7 DE 3 3 DC 3 3 FL 29 29 GA 16 16 HI 4 4 ID 4 4 IL 20 20 IN 11 11 IA 6 6 KS 6 6 KY 8 8 LA 8 8 ME 4 3 1 MD 10 10 MA 11 11 MI 16 16 MN 10 10 MS 6 6 MO 10 10 MT 3 3 NE 5 1 4 NV 6 6 NH 4 4 NJ 14 14 NM 5 5 NY 29 29 NC 15 15 ND 3 3 OH 18 18 OK 7 7 OR 7 7 PA 20 20 RI 4 4 SC 9 9 SD 3 3 TN 11 11 TX 38 38 UT 6 6 VT 3 3 VA 13 13 WA 12 12 WV 5 5 WI 10 10 WY 3 3 Total: 538 306 232 Total Electoral Votes Needed to Win = 270 - Page 1 of 12 - OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 SOURCE: State Elections Offices* STATE BIDEN BLANKENSHIP BODDIE CARROLL CHARLES AL 849,624 AK 153,778 1,127 AZ 1,672,143 13 AR 423,932 2,108 1,713 CA 11,110,250 2,605 559 CO 1,804,352 5,061 2,515 2,011 CT 1,080,831 219 11 DE 296,268 1 87 8 DC 317,323 FL 5,297,045 3,902 854 GA 2,473,633 61 8 701 65 HI 366,130 931 ID 287,021 1,886 163 IL 3,471,915 18 9,548 75 IN 1,242,416 895 IA 759,061 1,707 KS 570,323 KY 772,474 7 408 43 LA 856,034 860 1,125 2,497 ME 435,072 MD 1,985,023 4 795 30 MA 2,382,202 MI 2,804,040 7,235 963 MN 1,717,077 75 1,037 112 MS 539,398 1,279 1,161 MO 1,253,014 3,919 664 MT 244,786 23 NE 374,583 NV 703,486 3,138 NH 424,937
[Show full text]
ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: for the END IS a LIMIT
ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: FOR THE END IS A LIMIT: THE QUESTION CONCERNING THE ENVIRONMENT Ozguc Orhan, Doctor of Philosophy, 2007 Dissertation Directed By: Professor Charles E. Butterworth Department of Government and Politics Professor Ken Conca Department of Government and Politics This dissertation argues that Aristotle’s philosophy of praxis (i.e., ethics and politics) can contribute to our understanding of the contemporary question concerning the environment. Thinking seriously about the environment today calls for resisting the temptation to jump to conclusions about Aristotle’s irrelevance to the environment on historicist grounds of incommensurability or the fact that Aristotle did not write specifically on environmental issues as we know them. It is true that environmental problems are basically twentieth-century phenomena, but the larger normative discourses in which the terms “environmental” and “ecological” and their cognates are situated should be approached philosophically, namely, as cross-cultural and trans-historical phenomena that touch human experience at a deeper level. The philosophical perspective exploring the discursive meaning behind contemporary environmental praxis can reveal to us that certain aspects of Aristotle’s thought are relevant, or can be adapted, to the ends of environmentalists concerned with developmental problems. I argue that Aristotle’s views are already accepted and adopted in political theory and the praxis of the environment in many respects. In the first half of the dissertation, I
[Show full text]
2013 Committee Reports
Reports From Green Party Committees to the Green National Committee submitted at the 2013 Annual National Meeting Iowa City, Iowa GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES Finance Committee Annual Report to the GNC July, 2013 INTRODUCTION The primary mission of the Finance Committee is to monitor fiscal activities. It performs this duty in an advisory role to the Steering Committee, which has final authority on fiscal matters, except for those decisions reserved to the National Committee under the Fiscal Policy and the Bylaws of the GPUS. Current active members serving on the Finance Committee are Susan Chunco, CA; Bill Kreml, SC; Henry Bardel, NY; Frank Young, WV; and Jeff Turner, HI. Susan and Jeff serve as Co-Chairs of the committee. Jeff is the Treasurer of GPUS. BRIEF FINANCIAL HISTORY GPUS has experienced a steady decline in revenues every year since 2008. By the end of 2009 total debt to outside vendors, various earmarked funds, and generous Green creditors totaled nearly $93,000. Austerity measures were instituted in 2009 & 2010 to maintain operations. Some staff positions and the accountant contractor were eliminated. The office was moved for a reduction in rent and utilities. 2012 saw the first increase in revenue to reverse the decline experienced in prior years. By the end of the year that debt had been reduced to slightly over $30,000, mostly as a result of the cuts made in prior years, but also due to 2012 being a Presidential election year that produced slightly stronger fundraising than prior years. Significant expenditures were made for ballot access drives in 2012, but they were partially funded by loans from Greens; $5,875 of those loans remain unpaid, and are included in the total debt figure above.
[Show full text]
Pragmatism and the Politics of Rewilding Nature: the Case of Grizzly Bear Reintroduction in Idaho
University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2005 PRAGMATISM AND THE POLITICS OF REWILDING NATURE: THE CASE OF GRIZZLY BEAR REINTRODUCTION IN IDAHO John G. Hintz University of Kentucky Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hintz, John G., "PRAGMATISM AND THE POLITICS OF REWILDING NATURE: THE CASE OF GRIZZLY BEAR REINTRODUCTION IN IDAHO" (2005). University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. 357. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/357 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION John G. Hintz The Graduate School University of Kentucky College of Arts and Sciences 2005 PRAGMATISM AND THE POLITICS OF REWILDING NATURE: THE CASE OF GRIZZLY BEAR REINTRODUCTION IN IDAHO __________________________________ ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION ___________________________________ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky By John G. Hintz Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Susan M. Roberts, Associate Professor of Geography Lexington, Kentucky 2005 Copyright © John G. Hintz 2005 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION PRAGMATISM AND THE POLITICS OF REWILDING NATURE: THE CASE OF GRIZZLY BEAR REINTRODUCTION IN IDAHO In 1975, the US Fish and Wildlife Service listed the grizzly bear as a “threatened species” under the Endangered Species Act. Following the listing, a recovery plan was drafted in which the Bitterroot Ecosystem of central Idaho and extreme western Montana was one of six proposed grizzly bear recovery areas.
[Show full text]
Digital Resources for Teaching the Environment, Sustainability, and Ecology in World History
JOHN MAUNU Digital Resources for Teaching the Environment, Sustainability, and Ecology in World History ncient cave art showed that humans did not regard themselves as the center of the Anatural world. Lascaux cave art showed how animals and the environment were the center of human life. The Neolithic Revolution saw a change over time as to the relationship between humans and the environment. Early Vedic shamans wrote poems on the power of forests and nature; Taoists and the Buddha shared a deep respect for the environment and nature. However, with the Neolithic Revolution, humans began moving from the Lascaux perspective of humans in a secondary role in the environment to viewing nature and the environment as real estate, “territory,” and property to be dominated and exploited; since then most historians wrote about the environment from this human-centered perspective. However, by the mid twentieth century, there evolved among many environmentalists in the United States a model for understanding global environmental history in terms of the interaction between humankind and the environment, which was soon adopted by most world historians. The following digital resources reflect these shifts—these “changes over time”—in the historiography of the global environmental history. This database is divided into sec- tions: Environmental Racism/Justice, Ecofeminism; Queer Ecology; Far Right Environ- mentalism; Global Sustainability and Environment Resources; Teaching Sustainability and Environmental History, with a sub-heading, Teaching the Environment and Collapse of Civilization Resources; Eco-Fiction/Climate Fiction; Environment/Nature in Art and Architecture; Religion and Environment; Digital Resources arranged by global regions, such as the Artic, with sources arranged within regions chronologically using common world historian periodization; and, finally, Environment Journals/Websites.
[Show full text]
2008 OFFICIAL PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/04/08 DATE: January 22, 2009 SOURCE: State Elections Offices
2008 OFFICIAL PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/04/08 DATE: January 22, 2009 SOURCE: State Elections Offices STATE ALLEN AMONDSON BALDWIN BARR BOSS CALERO DUNCAN HARRIS JAY AL 4,310 4,991 AK 1,660 1,589 AZ 8 1,371 12,555 16 AR 4,023 4,776 CA 3,145 67,582 49 CO 348 85 6,233 10,897 154 598 CT 311 10 DE 626 1,109 58 DC FL 293 7,915 17,218 533 795 GA 8 1,314 28,812 20 HI 1,013 1,314 ID 4,747 3,658 IL 8,256 19,645 IN 1,024 29,257 IA 4,445 4,590 292 KS 2 4,148 6,706 KY 1 4,694 5,989 LA 275 2,581 735 ME 3 177 251 MD 3,760 9,842 1 MA 4,971 13,189 MI 14,685 23,716 MN 6,787 9,174 790 MS 2,551 2,529 MO 8,201 11,386 MT 1 143 1,355 NE 2,972 2,740 NV 3,194 4,263 NH 226 2,217 NJ 3,956 8,441 639 523 NM 1,597 2,428 NY 1 614 19,513 3,596 NC 25,722 ND 1,199 1,354 OH 2 12,550 19,888 3,902 OK OR 7,693 7,635 PA 1,092 19,912 RI 675 1,382 SC 6,827 7,283 SD 1,895 1,835 TN 8,191 8,547 1,011 TX 101 5,395 56,116 UT 2 12,012 6,966 1 VT 500 1,067 150 VA 7,474 11,067 WA 9,432 12,728 641 WV 2,465 WI 5,072 8,858 WY 1,192 1,594 Total: 477 653 199,314 523,686 639 5,127 3,902 2,424 2,422 Percentage: 0.00% 0.00% 0.15% 0.40% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% *Note: Italics indicate Write-In Votes.
[Show full text]
Summary Report Putnam Co, Wv Run Date:11/21/08
SUMMARY REPORT PUTNAM CO, WV RUN DATE:11/21/08 GENERAL ELECTION RUN TIME:10:38 AM NOVEMBER 4, 2008 VOTES PERCENT PRECINCTS COUNTED (OF 48) . 48 100.00 REGISTERED VOTERS ‐ TOTAL . 0 BALLOTS CAST ‐ TOTAL. 25,288 STRAIGHT PARTY TICKET ( Vote For Not More Than ) 1 REPUBLICAN PARTY (REP) . 2,546 49.93 DEMOCRATIC PARTY (DEM) . 2,484 48.72 MOUNTAIN PARTY (MTN). 69 1.35 PRESIDENT (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 JOHN McCAIN (REP). 15,162 60.92 BARACK OBAMA (DEM) . 9,334 37.51 CYNTHIA McKINNEY (MTN) . 55 .22 RALPH NADER (N/A). 171 .69 CHUCK BALDWIN (CON) . 56 .23 WRITE‐IN. 109 .44 U.S. SENATOR (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 JAY WOLFE (REP) . 10,236 41.56 JAY ROCKEFELLER (DEM) . 14,386 58.40 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 WRITE‐IN. 10 .04 U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2ND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO (REP). 15,605 62.85 ANNE BARTH (DEM) . 9,211 37.10 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 WRITE‐IN. 11 .04 GOVERNOR (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 RUSS WEEKS (REP) . 6,622 26.87 JOE MANCHIN, III (DEM) . 16,995 68.96 JESSE JOHNSON (MTN) . 1,005 4.08 WRITE‐IN. 24 .10 SECRETARY OF STATE (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 CHARLES MINIMAH (REP) . 8,762 36.65 NATALIE TENNANT (DEM) . 15,123 63.27 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 WRITE‐IN. 19 .08 AUDITOR (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 NO CANDIDATE FILED . 0 GLEN B. GAINER III (DEM) . 17,618 99.35 NO CANDIDATE FILED .
[Show full text]
The Creation of Enemies: Investigating Conservative Environmental Polarization, 1945-1981
The Creation of Enemies: Investigating Conservative Environmental Polarization, 1945-1981 by Adam Duane Orford A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Energy and Resources in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Daniel Kammen, Co-Chair Professor Katherine O’Neill, Co-Chair Professor Alastair Iles Professor Rebecca McLennan Spring 2021 © 2021 Adam Duane Orford all rights reserved Abstract The Creation of Enemies: Investigating Conservative Environmental Polarization, 1945-1981 by Adam Duane Orford Doctor of Philosophy in Energy and Resources University of California, Berkeley Professors Daniel Kammen and Katherine O’Neill, Co-Chairs This Dissertation examines the history of the conservative relationship with environmentalism in the United States between 1945 and 1981. In response to recent calls to bring the histories of U.S. political conservatism and environmentalism into conversation with each other, it investigates postwar environmental political history through the lens of partisan and ideological polarization and generates a research agenda for the field. It then contributes three new studies in conservative environmental politics: an analysis of the environmental rhetoric of a national business magazine; the legislative history of the first law to extend the power of the federal government to fight air pollution; and a history of the conservative response to Earth Day. It concludes that conservative opposition to environmentalism in the United States has been both ideological and situational. 1 Acknowledgements My most profound gratitude… To my parents, who always encouraged me to pursue my passions; To my wife, Dax, who knows what it takes to write a dissertation (I love you); And to all of the many people I have learned from at U.C.
[Show full text]
How to Transform Foreign Aid in Latin America Through Ecological Economics
Master thesis in Sustainable Development 2019/25 Examensarbete i Hållbar utveckling How to transform foreign aid in Latin America through ecological economics Mariana Fernández DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES INSTITUTIONEN FÖR GEOVETENSKAPER Master thesis in Sustainable Development 2019/25 Examensarbete i Hållbar utveckling How to transform foreign aid in Latin America through ecological economics Mariana Fernández Supervisor: Peter Söderbaum Subject Reviewer: Cecilia Mark-Herbert Copyright © Mariana Fernández and the Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University Published at Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University (www.geo.uu.se), Uppsala, 2019 Content 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………….….1 1.1 Research gap and rationale of the study………………..………………………….2 1.2 Research questions………………………………………………………………....3 2. Background………………………………………………………………………....5 2.1 Post-colonialism…………………………………………………………………....5 2.2 From “developmentalization” to Sustainable Development ………………............7 2.2.1 Sustainable Development Goals………………………………………..10 2.2.2 Sustainable Development in Latin America……………………………13 2.3 Foreign aid in Latin America……………………………………………………...17 2.3.1 Foreign aid through Neo-liberalism…………………………………….20 2.4 Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs)…………………………………………22 3. Theoretical Framework……...……………………………………………………24 3.1 Neoliberal Ideology and Neoclassical Economics……………………….………..24 3.2 From Neoclassical Environmental Economics to Ecological Economics…………25 3.2.1 Neoclassical Environmental Economics………………………………...25 3.2.2
[Show full text]
Preliminary Panels by Stream
Preliminary Program of Panels by Stream Critical Pedagogies Stream A Manifesto for the Agricultural Humanities Chair: Saskia Cornes • Saskia Cornes, Duke University, "Farming as Praxis in the Humanities" • Laura Sayre, Independent Scholar, "On the Resistance of Georgic: A Creative Exploration" • Leah Bayens, Sterling College, "The Liberal Arts Farmer" • Jeremy Oldfield, Yale Sustainable Farm Program, "Humanities Course Collaborations at the Yale Farm"" "Object Lessons: Teaching Ecocriticism via Visual Culture" Part 1 Chair: Maura Coughlin and Emily Gephart • Maura Coughlin, Bryant University, Elodie La Villette, The Bas Fort Blanc Path, Dieppe, (1885), oil on canvas • Jaimey Hamilton, University of Hawai'i, Dan Lin, Kathy Jetñil-Kijiner, Aka Niviâna, et. al, RISE: From One Island to Another, (2018) video poem • Aurélie Matheron, Fabrice Monteiro, The Prophecy (2014 – present), photographs • Michaela Rife, University of Michigan, Bounty (1940), tempera mural • Elizabeth Hutchinson, Barnard College/Columbia University, Thomas Moran, Gardiner Hot Springs, Yellowstone (1872), watercolor "Object Lessons: Teaching Ecocriticism via Visual Culture" Part 2 Chair: Maura Coughlin and Emily Gephart • Delia Byrnes, Allegheny College, Louie Palu, Arctic Passage (2019). • Daniel Finch-Race, University of Venice, Vincent van Gogh, Factories at Clichy (1887) • Gretchen Henderson, University of Texas, Robert Smithson, Spiral Jetty (1970) • Jen Garcia Peacock, Davidson College, Zeke Pena, The River (2018) • Emily Gephart, Tufts University, Winslow Homer,
[Show full text]