DOCSLIB.ORG

PRINO (Peer Reviewed in Name Only) Journals: When Quality Control in Scientific Publications Fails

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PRINO (Peer Reviewed in Name Only) Journals: When Quality Control in Scientific Publications Fails Australasian Journal of Herpetology Australasian Journal of Herpetology 26:3-64. ISSN 1836-5698 3(Print) Published 25 May 2015. ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) PRINO (Peer reviewed in name only) journals: When quality control in scientific publications fails. Raymond T. Hoser Snakebusters, PO Box 599, Doncaster, Victoria, 3108, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: snakeman (at) snakeman.com.au Received 2 July 2014, Accepted 18 May 2015, Published 25 May 2015. ABSTRACT “Peer Reviewed” publications are regarded as both the minimum standard and “gold standard” for scientific research publications. By common definition peer-reviewed articles are those that have been evaluated by two or more researchers or subject specialists in the academic community prior to the journal accepting it for publication. While not explicitly stated in the definition, it is implied that this ensures a quality and standard of factual information and accuracy, not necessarily present in those publications not subjected to peer review. In the period 1998 to 2009, a group of renegade reptile enthusiasts known as the Wüster gang decided to engineer a global boycott of established zoological names by this author (Hoser) and other eminent scientists in order steal the results of this work to rename the same taxa. Their campaign, initially commenced on the internet via chat forums and later through social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter failed (Hoser 2012c, 2013b). Lacking success and with so-called “Hoser names” moving into widespread usage, in 2012, the same group decided to mount a campaign to try to get others to support their “cause”, via a series of publications in ostensibly “peer reviewed” journals. These publications, including (Kaiser 2012a, 2012b) circulated via the web was later published in an ostensibly “peer reviewed” publication Herpetological Review, in a paper widely known as Kaiser et al. (2013). That paper was thoroughly discredited by Hoser (2013b) and also rejected by Cogger (2013, 2014a), Dubois (2014), Eipper (2013), Mutton (2014a, 2014b), Shea (2013a-d), Thorpe (2013, 2014a, 2014b), Wellington (2013, 2014a), Wells (2013, 2014), and many others, so this history is not reviewed here. More recently in the period 2013 and 2014, associates of this same band of thieves have published a series of descriptions of species and genera that overwrite names published in accordance with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (“The Code”, “Zoological Rules” or “Zoological Code”) (Ride et al. 1999). This has been in various “peer reviewed” journals. This paper details the obvious defects in the relevant papers, within the context of documenting obvious ongoing failures of cases of alleged “peer review”. Also shown is how the term “peer review” and the affected publications have been hijacked by dishonest people working as pseudoscientists to put a veneer of respectability to their own less than honourable schemes. Relevant cases of reckless taxonomic vandalism, also defined herein, by so-called zoologists acting in deliberate violation of the Zoological Code are detailed. These publications have created an unscientific mess that other scientists are forced to spend time correcting. The term PRINO, an abbreviation of “peer review in name only” is formally coined to identify those journals where the peer review process is so debased or shambolic as to effectively be absent in terms of any real benefit. Keywords: PRINO; peer review; journal; Wüster; Schliep; O’Shea; Kaiser; Hansen; Baig; Bates; Thieves; Twombley; Creationist; science; Shea; Cogger; Wells, Wellington; herpetology; zoology; taxonomy; nomenclature; scolecophidians; Gerrhosauridae; Swilesaurus; Funkisaurus; cryptozoology; Adelynkimberlea; Macrochelys; Broghammerus; Malayopython; Laudakia; Leiopython; Bothrochilus; hoserae; bennetti; meridionalis; montanus; Candoiidae; Zootaxa; ICZN, DNA; Zoological Code ; rules; scientific fraud; theft. Hoser 2015 - Australasian Journal of Herpetology 26:3-64. Available online at www.herp.net Copyright- Kotabi Publishing - All rights reserved 4 Australasian Journal of Herpetology INTRODUCTION near unanimously against the renegades seeking to “Peer Reviewed” publications are regarded as both step outside the Zoological Code and rename the minimum standard and “gold standard” for properly named taxa. scientific research publications. By definition “Peer- It is also significant that the brief of the ICZN is also reviewed articles have been evaluated by several to enforce the rules of “The Code” and that is what researchers or subject specialists in the academic they have done to date. community prior to the journal accepting it for In every case, where attempts have been made to publication.” suppress one scientist’s works for the purposes of While not explicitly stated in the definition, it is renaming their taxa, the arguments have been the implied that this ensures a quality and standard of same. They have included the catch-all claim that factual information and accuracy, not necessarily the to be suppressed author is a “taxonomic vandal” present in un-peer-reviewed publications. or “unscientific”, easily shown to be a lie, because if This paper details the obvious defects in several that were the case, then the original scientist’s taxonomic papers, within the context of works could simply be placed into synonymy with documenting obvious failures of alleged “peer correct taxa as is done regularly in zoology and review”. within the Zoological Code. Also shown is how the term “peer review” has been If and when the alleged taxonomic vandal’s science hijacked by dishonest people working as is shown to be correct to the wider global audience pseudoscientists to put a veneer of respectability to to a degree that denial is pointless, the alleged their own less than honourable schemes. vandals are then accused of stealing the work from those who first identified the first author’s work as The term PRINO, an abbreviation of “peer review in taxonomic vandalism. name only” is formally coined to identify those journals where the peer review process is so It is a catch-22 situation engineered to ensure that debased and shambolic as to effectively be absent. the target scientist whose work is to be stolen, never gets credit for what they have done. As a preamble it is fitting that the cases that follow be put in a historical context. When the arguments are stripped bare, it invariably In the period 1998 to 2009, a group of renegade gets down to the fact that one group of people are reptile enthusiasts including people with convictions acting in an unprofessional manner and don’t want for animal cruelty and wildlife smuggling waged an to use the names or recognize the contribution to ongoing war against myself (Raymond Hoser). zoology by their adversaries or competitors. I am a herpetologist of global repute and author of A common but associated claim mounted is that the many hundreds of scientific papers published in original scientists have named “too many” taxa, both the peer reviewed and “popular” literature. The thereby depriving later workers of the right to name first peer reviewed paper was published by myself in species. 1980 in the Australian journal Herpetofauna (Hoser The claim is ridiculous in the extreme as it is in 1980) and my scientific publishing career spans the effect a call on scientists to stop working to allow period from that date to 2015. later “scientists” the ability to make discoveries. The group of renegades, known widely as “the Can you seriously imagine one scientist saying to Wüster gang”, although also marketing themselves another, “don’t publish your cure for cancer, as “truth haters” in order to gain some sort of because one day I might get around to doing it”? warped notoriety in the herpetological community, I should also add that no vertebrate taxonomists in decided to engineer a global boycott of established the 21st Century come anywhere near approaching zoological names in order to rename the same taxa the scale of mass-naming species and genera as themselves. compared to the major contributors from the 1800’s Other attempts to do this sort of thing have been and that there has never been a Zoological Code tried in zoological science many times over the past imposed limitation on the number of species or 200 years, but have always failed. The best known genera a person is allowed to name. recent examples were the attempts to suppress and In both the attempt to squash the names of Wells rename several hundred reptile species and genera, and Wellington in a petition to the ICZN in 1987 and formally named by Richard Wells and Ross in the Wüster gang’s campaign of 2012-2015, the Wellington in 1984 and 1985 (The president, same claim of the alleged “taxonomic vandal” Australian Society of herpetologists 1987, ICZN naming too many species has been raised as an 1991, 2001). argument in favour of suppression of the affected These attempts failed, as have all others, with the works. ICZN Commissioners ruling either unanimously, or Hoser 2015 - Australasian Journal of Herpetology 26:3-64. Available online at www.herp.net Copyright- Kotabi Publishing - All rights reserved Australasian Journal of Herpetology 5 This equally bizarre suggestion must be reconciled This is the use of the internet to mount the with the more reasonable suggestion that perhaps campaign. the targeted scientists have simply been more Wüster’s ability to use the internet in every “productive” than their adversaries may have hoped. conceivable way to create a false veneer of the truth This is the usual accolade afforded to persons who and market his lies has been well documented have named a large number of taxa. already (Hoser 2012a, Hoser, 2012c and Hoser Such productivity in terms of ability to name valid 2013b). zoological entities within the boundaries of the In terms of volume of posts attacking myself, made Zoological Code (Ride et al. 1999) has clearly irked both under his real name, aliases he has assumed the Wüster gang, members of which led the and via people he has recruited to his cause is campaign against Wells and Wellington in the astronomical.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 500 Natural Sciences and Mathematics
    500 500 Natural sciences and mathematics Natural sciences: sciences that deal with matter and energy, or with objects and processes observable in nature Class here interdisciplinary works on natural and applied sciences Class natural history in 508. Class scientific principles of a subject with the subject, plus notation 01 from Table 1, e.g., scientific principles of photography 770.1 For government policy on science, see 338.9; for applied sciences, see 600 See Manual at 231.7 vs. 213, 500, 576.8; also at 338.9 vs. 352.7, 500; also at 500 vs. 001 SUMMARY 500.2–.8 [Physical sciences, space sciences, groups of people] 501–509 Standard subdivisions and natural history 510 Mathematics 520 Astronomy and allied sciences 530 Physics 540 Chemistry and allied sciences 550 Earth sciences 560 Paleontology 570 Biology 580 Plants 590 Animals .2 Physical sciences For astronomy and allied sciences, see 520; for physics, see 530; for chemistry and allied sciences, see 540; for earth sciences, see 550 .5 Space sciences For astronomy, see 520; for earth sciences in other worlds, see 550. For space sciences aspects of a specific subject, see the subject, plus notation 091 from Table 1, e.g., chemical reactions in space 541.390919 See Manual at 520 vs. 500.5, 523.1, 530.1, 919.9 .8 Groups of people Add to base number 500.8 the numbers following —08 in notation 081–089 from Table 1, e.g., women in science 500.82 501 Philosophy and theory Class scientific method as a general research technique in 001.4; class scientific method applied in the natural sciences in 507.2 502 Miscellany 577 502 Dewey Decimal Classification 502 .8 Auxiliary techniques and procedures; apparatus, equipment, materials Including microscopy; microscopes; interdisciplinary works on microscopy Class stereology with compound microscopes, stereology with electron microscopes in 502; class interdisciplinary works on photomicrography in 778.3 For manufacture of microscopes, see 681.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative Revision of the Giant Pill-Millipede Genus Sphaeromimus
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 414: 67–107 (2014) New Sphaeromimus species from Madagascar 67 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.414.7730 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Integrative revision of the giant pill-millipede genus Sphaeromimus from Madagascar, with the description of seven new species (Diplopoda, Sphaerotheriida, Arthrosphaeridae) Thomas Wesener1,2,†, Daniel Minh-Tu Le1,3,‡, Stephanie F. Loria1,4,§ 1 Field Museum of Natural History, Zoology - Insects, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, 60605 Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. 2 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Center for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research (Section Myriapoda), Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany 3 School of the Art Institute of Chicago, 36 S. Wabash Avenue, 60603 Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. 4 American Museum of Natural History, Richard Glider Graduate School, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, U.S.A. † http://zoobank.org/86DEA7CD-988C-43EC-B9D6-C51000595B47 ‡ http://zoobank.org/AD76167C-3755-4803-AEB5-4CD9A7CB820A § http://zoobank.org/ED92B15A-10F9-47B8-A8FA-D7673007F8A5 Corresponding author: Thomas Wesener ([email protected]) Academic editor: D.V. Spiegel | Received 15 April 2014 | Accepted 8 May 2014 | Published 6 June 2014 http://zoobank.org/59FA2886-34C2-4AEF-9783-3347E5EBC702 Citation: Wesener T, Le DM-T, Loria SF (2014) Integrative revision of the giant pill-millipede genus Sphaeromimus from Madagascar, with the description of seven new species (Diplopoda, Sphaerotheriida, Arthrosphaeridae). ZooKeys 414: 67–107. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.414.7730 Abstract The Malagasy giant pill-millipede genusSphaeromimus de Saussure & Zehntner, 1902 is revised. Seven new species, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field
    Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field June 12, 2007 ABSTRACT This is compilation of a technical analysis of existing paleontological data and a limited, selective paleontological field survey of the geologic bedrock formations that will be impacted on Federal lands by construction associated with energy development in the Jonah Field, Sublette County, Wyoming. The field survey was done on approximately 20% of the field, primarily where good bedrock was exposed or where there were existing, debris piles from recent construction. Some potentially rich areas were inaccessible due to biological restrictions. Heavily vegetated areas were not examined. All locality data are compiled in the separate confidential appendix D. Uinta Paleontological Associates Inc. was contracted to do this work through EnCana Oil & Gas Inc. In addition BP and Ultra Resources are partners in this project as they also have holdings in the Jonah Field. For this project, we reviewed a variety of geologic maps for the area (approximately 47 sections); none of maps have a scale better than 1:100,000. The Wyoming 1:500,000 geology map (Love and Christiansen, 1985) reveals two Eocene geologic formations with four members mapped within or near the Jonah Field (Wasatch – Alkali Creek and Main Body; Green River – Laney and Wilkins Peak members). In addition, Winterfeld’s 1997 paleontology report for the proposed Jonah Field II Project was reviewed carefully. After considerable review of the literature and museum data, it became obvious that the portion of the mapped Alkali Creek Member in the Jonah Field is probably misinterpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Catches of the Pitcairn Island Group
    The Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Catches of the Pitcairn Island Group THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY AND FISHERIES CATCHES OF THE PITCAIRN ISLAND GROUP M.L.D. Palomares, D. Chaitanya, S. Harper, D. Zeller and D. Pauly A report prepared for the Global Ocean Legacy project of the Pew Environment Group by the Sea Around Us Project Fisheries Centre The University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Daniel Pauly RECONSTRUCTION OF TOTAL MARINE FISHERIES CATCHES FOR THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS (1950-2009) ...................................................................................... 3 Devraj Chaitanya, Sarah Harper and Dirk Zeller DOCUMENTING THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY OF THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS THROUGH FISHBASE AND SEALIFEBASE ..................................................................................... 10 Maria Lourdes D. Palomares, Patricia M. Sorongon, Marianne Pan, Jennifer C. Espedido, Lealde U. Pacres, Arlene Chon and Ace Amarga APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 1: FAO AND RECONSTRUCTED CATCH DATA ......................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 2: TOTAL RECONSTRUCTED CATCH BY MAJOR TAXA ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diplopoda, Sphaerotheriida, Arthrosphaeridae)
    European Journal of Taxonomy 758: 1–48 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.758.1423 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2021 · Wesener T. & Sagorny C. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:01BBC12C-E715-4393-A9F6-6EA85CB1289F Seven new giant pill-millipede species and numerous new records of the genus Zoosphaerium from Madagascar (Diplopoda, Sphaerotheriida, Arthrosphaeridae) Thomas WESENER 1,* & Christina SAGORNY 2 1,2 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK), Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Section Myriapoda, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany. 2 University of Bonn, Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, D-53121 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:86DEA7CD-988C-43EC-B9D6-C51000595B47 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:9C89C1B7-897A-426E-8FD4-C747DF004C85 Abstract. Seven new species of the giant pill-millipede genus Zoosphaerium Pocock, 1895 are described from Madagascar: Z. nigrum sp. nov., Z. silens sp. nov., Z. ambatovaky sp. nov., Z. beanka sp. nov., Z. voahangy sp. nov., Z. masoala sp. nov. and Z. spinopiligerum sp. nov. All species are described based on drawings and scanning electron microscopy, while genetic barcoding of the COI gene was successful for six of the seven new species. Additional COI barcode information is provided for the fi rst time for Z. album Wesener, 2009 and Z. libidinosum (de Saussure & Zehntner, 1897). Zoosphaerium nigrum sp. nov. and Z. silens sp. nov. belong to the Z. libidinosum species-group, Z.
    [Show full text]
  • First Recorded Introduction of the Milliped Order Stemmiulida (Eugnatha: Nematophora): Potential Establishment in Florida, USA
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 8-24-2012 First recorded introduction of the milliped order Stemmiulida (Eugnatha: Nematophora): Potential establishment in Florida, USA, and new records from Mexico; northward range extension into southern Tamaulipas Rowland M. Shelley North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, [email protected] G. B. Edwards Florida State Collection of Arthropods, [email protected] Arthur E. Bogan North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Shelley, Rowland M.; Edwards, G. B.; and Bogan, Arthur E., "First recorded introduction of the milliped order Stemmiulida (Eugnatha: Nematophora): Potential establishment in Florida, USA, and new records from Mexico; northward range extension into southern Tamaulipas" (2012). Insecta Mundi. 757. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/757 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0245 First recorded introduction of the milliped order Stemmiulida (Eugnatha: Nematophora): Potential establishment in Florida, USA, and new records from Mexico; northward range extension into southern Tamaulipas Rowland M. Shelley Research Laboratory North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences MSC #1626 Raleigh, NC 27699-1626 USA G. B. Edwards Florida State Collection of Arthropods Division of Plant Industry P. O.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of the Dwarf Boas and a Comparison of Bayesian and Bootstrap Measures of Phylogenetic Support
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25 (2002) 361–371 www.academicpress.com Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support Thomas P. Wilcox, Derrick J. Zwickl, Tracy A. Heath, and David M. Hillis* Section of Integrative Biology and Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA Received 4 February 2002; received in revised form 18 May 2002 Abstract Four New World genera of dwarf boas (Exiliboa, Trachyboa, Tropidophis, and Ungaliophis) have been placed by many syste- matists in a single group (traditionally called Tropidophiidae). However, the monophyly of this group has been questioned in several studies. Moreover, the overall relationships among basal snake lineages, including the placement of the dwarf boas, are poorly understood. We obtained mtDNAsequence data for 12S, 16S, and intervening tRNA–valgenes from 23 species of snakes repre- senting most major snake lineages, including all four genera of New World dwarf boas. We then examined the phylogenetic position of these species by estimating the phylogeny of the basal snakes. Our phylogenetic analysis suggests that New World dwarf boas are not monophyletic. Instead, we find Exiliboa and Ungaliophis to be most closely related to sand boas (Erycinae), boas (Boinae), and advanced snakes (Caenophidea), whereas Tropidophis and Trachyboa form an independent clade that separated relatively early in snake radiation. Our estimate of snake phylogeny differs significantly in other ways from some previous estimates of snake phy- logeny. For instance, pythons do not cluster with boas and sand boas, but instead show a strong relationship with Loxocemus and Xenopeltis.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Genus Pinnixa White, 1846
    DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION : Bruno David Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTRICE EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Laure Desutter-Grandcolas ASSISTANTS DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITORS : Anne Mabille ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Anne Mabille COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE / SCIENTIFIC BOARD : James Carpenter (AMNH, New York, États-Unis) Maria Marta Cigliano (Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentine) Henrik Enghoff (NHMD, Copenhague, Danemark) Rafael Marquez (CSIC, Madrid, Espagne) Peter Ng (University of Singapore) Norman I. Platnick (AMNH, New York, États-Unis) Jean-Yves Rasplus (INRA, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France) Jean-François Silvain (IRD, Gif-sur-Yvette, France) Wanda M. Weiner (Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracovie, Pologne) John Wenzel (The Ohio State University, Columbus, États-Unis) COUVERTURE / COVER : Morphological characters of the type species of some genera within subfamily Pinnixinae Števčić, 2005. Zoosystema est indexé dans / Zoosystema is indexed in: – Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch®) – ISI Alerting Services® – Current Contents® / Agriculture, Biology, and Environmental Sciences® – Scopus® Zoosystema est distribué en version électronique par / Zoosystema is distributed electronically by: – BioOne® (http://www.bioone.org) Les articles ainsi que les nouveautés nomenclaturales publiés dans Zoosystema sont référencés par / Articles and nomenclatural novelties published in Zoosystema are referenced by: – ZooBank® (http://zoobank.org) Zoosystema est une revue en flux continu publiée par les Publications scientifiques du Muséum, Paris / Zoosystema is a fast track journal published by the Museum Science Press, Paris Les Publications scientifiques du Muséum publient aussi / The Museum Science Press also publish: Adansonia, Geodiversitas, Anthropozoologica, European Journal of Taxonomy, Naturae, Cryptogamie sous-sections Algologie, Bryologie, Mycologie. Diffusion – Publications scientifiques Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle CP 41 – 57 rue Cuvier F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) Tél.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxon Filter, a Novel Mechanism Designed to Facilitate the Relationship Between Taxonomy and Nomenclature, Vis-À-Vis the Ut
    Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 70(4) December 2013 293 The Taxon Filter, a novel mechanism designed to facilitate the relationship between taxonomy and nomenclature, vis-à-vis the utility of the Code’s Article 81 (the Commission’s plenary power) Hinrich Kaiser Department of Biology, Victor Valley College, 18422 Bear Valley Road, Victorville, California 92395, U.S.A. & Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN, 1999; hereafter the Code) has one fundamental aim: ‘to promote stability and universality in the scientific names of animals and to ensure that the name of each taxon is unique and distinct. All its provisions and recommendations are subservient to those ends and none restricts the freedom of taxonomic thought or actions.’ (Preamble of the 4th edition of the Code; ICZN, 1999). To be clear: in its pursuit of this aim the Code is not an evidence-based scientific system, let alone a taxonomic method. It is, I would suggest, an accounting system akin to those used in finance, defined for this purpose as ‘a system of collection, storage, and processing of [taxonomic] data that is used by decision makers’ (Atabaki & Khanmohammad, 2013, p. 41). Such a system is by design based on general principles, receiving input from those engaged in taxo- nomic science. However, even if the science of taxonomy is distinct from the nonscientific realm of nomenclature, the two intersect every time information from the former is passed to the latter.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidying up the Taxonomy of the Extant Booidea, Including the Erection and Naming of Two New Families, the Description of Acrantophis Sloppi Sp
    Australasian Journal of Herpetology 3 Australasian Journal of Herpetology 16:3-8. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Published 29 April 2013. Tidying up the taxonomy of the extant Booidea, including the erection and naming of two new families, the description of Acrantophis sloppi sp. nov., a new species of Ground Boa from Madagascar and Candoia aspera iansimpsoni, subsp. nov., a new subspecies of Boa from Papua New Guinea. RAYMOND T. HOSER 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3134, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: [email protected] Received 2 Dec. 2012, Accepted 17 Jan. 2013, Published 29 April 2013. ABSTRACT In the wake of numerous recent studies cited within this paper, the phylogeny of extant true boas has been significantly clarified. The six main clades within Booidea warrant being placed into named and defined families according to the Zoological Code as done herein. Two are formally named for the first time. The same applies to the two obviously divergent subfamilies, meaning in effect the creation of four subfamilies, two of which are by definition, new, although these have pre-existing and available names. For completeness, two new tribes are also formally named according to the Zoological Code. Furthermore, the well-known but as yet unnamed species of Ground Boa from the southern half of Madagas- car, closely related to the species Acrantophis dumerili Jan, 1860, and with which it has long been confused, is formally described herein as a new species, namely Acrantophis sloppi. Of note, the genus Candoia Gray, 1842 is herein regarded as consisting at the very lowest level, three subgenera, for which there are already available names.
    [Show full text]
  • G Iant Snakes
    Copyrighted Material Some pages are omitted from this book preview. Giant Snakes Giant Giant Snakes A Natural History John C. Murphy & Tom Crutchfield Snakes, particularly venomous snakes and exceptionally large constricting snakes, have haunted the human brain for a millennium. They appear to be responsible for our excellent vision, as well as the John C. Murphy & Tom Crutchfield & Tom C. Murphy John anxiety we feel. Despite the dangers we faced in prehistory, snakes now hold clues to solving some of humankind’s most debilitating diseases. Pythons and boas are capable of eating prey that is equal to more than their body weight, and their adaptations for this are providing insight into diabetes. Fascination with snakes has also drawn many to keep them as pets, including the largest species. Their popularity in the pet trade has led to these large constrictors inhabiting southern Florida. This book explores what we know about the largest snakes, how they are kept in captivity, and how they have managed to traverse ocean barriers with our help. Copyrighted Material Some pages are omitted from this book preview. Copyrighted Material Some pages are omitted from this book preview. Giant Snakes A Natural History John C. Murphy & Tom Crutchfield Copyrighted Material Some pages are omitted from this book preview. Giant Snakes Copyright © 2019 by John C. Murphy & Tom Cructhfield All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America First Printing March 2019 ISBN 978-1-64516-232-2 Paperback ISBN 978-1-64516-233-9 Hardcover Published by: Book Services www.BookServices.us ii Copyrighted Material Some pages are omitted from this book preview.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Collared Snakes and Burrowing Asps (Aparallactinae
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2017-01-01 Systematics Of Collared Snakes And Burrowing Asps (aparallactinae And Atractaspidinae) (squamata: Lamprophiidae) Francisco Portillo University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Portillo, Francisco, "Systematics Of Collared Snakes And Burrowing Asps (aparallactinae And Atractaspidinae) (squamata: Lamprophiidae)" (2017). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 731. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/731 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SYSTEMATICS OF COLLARED SNAKES AND BURROWING ASPS (APARALLACTINAE AND ATRACTASPIDINAE) (SQUAMATA: LAMPROPHIIDAE) FRANCISCO PORTILLO, BS, MS Doctoral Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology APPROVED: Eli Greenbaum, Ph.D., Chair Carl Lieb, Ph.D. Michael Moody, Ph.D. Richard Langford, Ph.D. Charles H. Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Francisco Portillo 2017 SYSTEMATICS OF COLLARED SNAKES AND BURROWING ASPS (APARALLACTINAE AND ATRACTASPIDINAE) (SQUAMATA: LAMPROPHIIDAE) by FRANCISCO PORTILLO, BS, MS DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Biological Sciences THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO May 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to thank my family for their love and support throughout my life. I am very grateful to my lovely wife, who has been extremely supportive, motivational, and patient, as I have progressed through graduate school.
    [Show full text]