University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship 2009 Historic Perspectives on Law & Science Robin Feldman UC Hastings College of the Law,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Robin Feldman, Historic Perspectives on Law & Science, 2009 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 1 (2009). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/faculty_scholarship/157 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Faculty Publications UC Hastings College of the Law Library Author: Robin Cooper Feldman Source: Stanford Technology Law Review Citation: 2009 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 1 (2009). Title: Historic Perspectives on Law & Science Originally published in STANFORD TECHNOLOGY LAW REVIEW. This article is reprinted with permission from STANFORD TECHNOLOGY LAW REVIEW and Stanford Law School. Robin Feldman: Historic Perspectives on Law & Science Stanford Technology Law Review Historic Perspectives on Law & Science ROBIN FELDMAN CITE AS: 2009 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 1 http://stlr.stanford.edu/pdf/feldman-historic-perspectives.pdf ¶1 Law has had a long and troubled relationship with science. The misuse of science within the legal realm, as well as our failed attempts to make law more scientific, are well documented.1 The cause of these problems, however, is less clear. ¶2 I would like to suggest that the unsatisfying relationship of law and science can be attributed, at least in part, to law‘s inadequate understanding of what constitutes science and law‘s inflated view of the potential benefits of science for law.