Anthropology 1101: Being Human

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anthropology 1101: Being Human Anthropology Table of Contents Chapter 1: What Is Anthropology? Chapter 2: Are Humans Unique? Chapter 3: Pursuit of Food Chapter 4: Ritual and Religion Chapter 5: Marriage Chapter 6: Language Chapter 7: Primates Chapter 8: Human Variation Chapter 9: How Did We Get Here? Chapter 10: Portals to the Past Chapter 1: What Is Anthropology? Happy people in PNG by eGuide Travel is licensed under CC BY 2.0 nthropology studies what it means to be human. In fact, the term A “anthropology” literally means the study of humans (anthropos is Greek for humanity). We are often fascinated with other people and even fascinated with ourselves, and why shouldn’t we be? After all, within each human skull lies the human brain, which neuroscientist Christof Koch calls the most complex object in the known universe (Flatow 2013). With our brain we can strive to know the world around us, or as astronomer Carl Sagan put it, “We are a way for the Cosmos to know itself.” The field of anthropology trains the lens not on the outward universe but on ourselves. In doing do, anthropologists endeavor to suspend judgment, cultural assumptions, and beliefs about what is normal, and to view ourselves with fresh eyes. Anthropology is not just about one aspect of humanity, such as our economic systems, political organization, religion, or biology. Rather, anthropology is about all of these topics and how they intersect with each other. In fact, anthropology is a broad discipline that covers all of human history, all the peoples of the world today, all the languages, all the technology, and the biology of humans. Anthropology even extends its reach to other primates like apes and monkeys in an effort to understand how we are similar and different to those species. By keeping the perspective broad, anthropology addresses some of the Anthropology strives to see ourselves from a biggest questions of our day: Who are fresh perspective. Photo: Sue Ruth we? How did we get here? Where might we be headed? How does one discipline even begin to address all these varied topics? To make things more manageable, anthropology is divided into four subfields namely, cultural anthropology, linguistic anthropology, biological anthropology, and archaeology. Cultural anthropology is interested in human culture and the diversity of human social life. Linguistic anthropology explores human languages and how language connects with human culture. Biological anthropology studies human biology, especially physical variation in humans, fossil ancestors, genetics, and how biology intersects with human culture. Archaeology investigates the human past through material remains. There is also a fifth subfield that crosscuts the other four subfields, called applied anthropology. This subfield uses anthropological techniques and concepts to help solve modern-day problems. Dog Sledding in Uummannaq, Greenland” is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Anthropology is considered a holistic discipline because it is interested in all aspects of humanity and takes a multitude of approaches toward understanding the human condition. Humans adapt both biologically and culturally to physical and social environments. Adaptation refers to how organisms cope with their environment. Himalayan sherpas of Nepal climb Mount Everest far more easily than a New Yorker in part because they are biologically adapted to high altitudes by making more energy for the same amount of oxygen (Senthilingam 2016). The Bajau “sea nomads” of Southeast Asia, may have a genetic adpatation to breath- hold diving. We also learn to adapt to our environments culturally. To live in extreme arctic conditions, we do not need a biological adaptation like thick pelt of fur; we simply learn to sew a coat, build a shelter, and make fire. Because of the flexibility of culture, more than any other organism, we are able to occupy all environments of the planet from deserts to polar regions to the oceans and we beyond the Earth itself. What’s more, culture and biology are not separate and distinct systems, rather they are “utterly intertwined” (Sapolsky 2017). The cultural practice of drinking animal milk, for example, led some populations to be biologically able to continue to digest milk into adulthood. Likewise, the cultural practices of climbing mountains and deep sea diving has led to biological changes in sherpa and sea nomad peoples. The holistic approach makes anthropology somewhat different than other social sciences. What is Water? The late writer and Pulitzer Prize finalist David Foster Wallace recounted in his “What is water?” commencement address (Sullivan 2013): “There are these two young fish swimming along and they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says, ‘Morning boys, how’s the water?’ The two young fish swim on for a bit, and then eventually one of them looks over at the other and goes, ‘What the hell is water?’” What’s true for fish in water is also true for human culture. Culture is so pervasive, we don’t even recognize that we are “swimming” in it all the time. Take a look around you. How many things do you see that weren’t made, modified, or influenced by humans? We can become so accustomed to our own culture, that when we see a different way of doing something, even something simple like counting or snapping, we can be taken by surprise because it never occurred to us that there was a different way to go about these everyday actions. Finger Snapping https://www.youtube.com/embed/-ygu57NhhQ0?rel=0 Finger Snapping Lupita Nyong’o Teaches How to Do an African Finger Snap Two important concepts in anthropology are cultural relativism and ethnocentrism. Cultural relativism means trying to suspend moral judgment in order to understand why people have certain practices and beliefs. Anthropologists don’t condone practices simply because they exist, but rather seek to understand the underlying causes. After all, few people would give the thumbs up to human sacrifice or torture simply because they are part of someone’s culture or associated with someone’s heritage. Cultural relativism not only provides a starting point for understanding other cultures, but also allows a window into our own cultural biases. As anthropologist Michael F. Brown (2014:6) writes in his book Upriver on Amazonian cultures, “We become aware of the arbitrariness of deep-seated practices and beliefs only when forced to confront other societies whose customs differ from our own.” Sometimes we need to look outside our own culture, the water in which we swim, in order to see it more clearly. Huri Duna Dancers [PNG] WOMAD 11” by Peter Tea is licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0 The flip side of cultural relativism is ethnocentrism, which means using your own culture to pass judgment on another. Ethnocentrism is the idea that your own beliefs, values, and behaviors are the correct ones. You have probably heard the word “egocentric” used to refer to someone who considers a situation only from their own personal viewpoint. Ethnocentrism is similar, but from the perspective of an entire culture. Anthropology reveals that there are many ways of being human. Insights into the many varieties of being human can reset how central and important we think we are. Sometimes this way of thinking can be threatening, but it can also be intriguing, thought-provoking, and even inspiring. The WEIRD Problem Anthropology is comparative, studying a broad range of human groups, from hunter-gatherers to corporate culture. This comparative approach is important because if we only consider Western cultures, we would have a very skewed view of who humans are. The term “Western” refers to beliefs and values that have an origin in the European Renaissance and Age of Enlightenment. A well-known problem in psychology is that much research in that discipline has been based on people living in Westernized nations. This is largely because they are the most convenient subjects to study. In fact, American undergraduate students are common psychology research subjects—not a very representative cross-section of the world’s mental life. Psychologists recognize this problem and have labeled these subjects WEIRD—Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (Henrich et al. 2010). The acronym WEIRD is apt because most cultures have decidedly different beliefs and values than American college students as well as different life experiences. Anthropology casts its net beyond Western societies to try to circumvent the WEIRD problem and understand the human condition as a whole. “WEIRD” CNM students. College students are typical subjects of psychology research. Photo: Sue Ruth Quantitative vs. Qualitative Anthropology is usually classified as a social science because it seeks explanations about human societies through careful observation and systematic analysis. Social scientists often look for general explanations and use quantitative methods, which means that some kind of measuring is involved. Anthropology also has elements of the humanities, in that it is interested in the diversity of human societies. This approach tends to be more qualitative, which involves explaining or describing a particular society or practice. Imagine an anthropologist is interested in recycling on campus. They might document how people feel about recycling, which would be a more qualitative approach. Another anthropologist studying recycling might take a quantitative approach by recording the items in the bin. The two approaches would provide different, but equally useful insights into recycling behavior, and both are valuable in anthropology. CNM Recycles! We have single-stream recycling, meaning all recyclables can go in the same bin. Click here to see what can go in the blue bins and rectangular bins Cultural Anthropology Cultural anthropology, or sociocultural anthropology, is the study of human culture. In everyday conversations we might say someone who has excellent taste in art, music, literature is “cultured.” This, however, is not the definition of culture that anthropologists use.
Recommended publications
  • The Cognitive Animal Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition
    This PDF includes a chapter from the following book: The Cognitive Animal Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology License Terms: Made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ OA Funding Provided By: The open access edition of this book was made possible by generous funding from Arcadia—a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin. The title-level DOI for this work is: doi:10.7551/mitpress/1885.001.0001 Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/edited-volume/chapter-pdf/677498/9780262268028_c002400.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 Chimpanzee Ai and Her Son Ayumu: An Episode of Education by Master- 25 Apprenticeship Tetsuro Matsuzawa I have been studying chimpanzee (Pan troglo- use has never before been found in nonhuman dytes) intelligence both in the laboratory and animals. Humans show strong hand preference in the wild (Matsuzawa 2001). Chimpanzees in on the individual level, and there is also a strong the wild use and manufacture a wide variety of right bias at the population level. The chimpan- tools, such as twigs to fish for termites or a pair zees of Bossou show a slight bias toward the of stones to crack open hard-shelled nuts. Re- right for hammering at the population level, with cent studies comparing di¤erent communities of about 67 percent of group members being right- chimpanzees have shown that each community handers. However, there is perfect correspon- develops its own unique set of cultural traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The KING Was Here!
    THOSE GUYS ARE GOOD.....SIERRA MADRE COLTS TAKE SUPER REGION! ..Page 10 SATURDAY, JULY 27, 2013 Inside this week: VOLUME 7 NO. 30 SIERRA MADRE COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM (CERT) RECEIVES A GIFT Calendar Page 2 Sierra Madre News Page 3 Local government prepares for everyday emergencies. However, during a disaster, the number and scope of incidents can overwhelm conventional emergency services. The Sierra PASADENA/ALTADENA Madre Community Emergency Response SGV Journalist Janette Pg. 4 Team (CERT) helps in those situations in Williams Dies three main ways. First, there is an education program in which the public is made aware AROUND SGV Pg. 5 of how to prepare for emergencies and be FIRST ANNUAL HOMICIDE self-sufficient. Secondly, CERT conducts a SUMMIT FEMA recognized all-risks and all-hazards training program designed to help a person protect themselves, their family and ARCADIA NEWS Pg. 6 their neighbors in an emergency situation. Assemblyman Ed Chau To Speak And lastly, Sierra Madre CERT, under the sponsorship and direction of the Sierra Madre Fire Department, directly supports MONROVIA/DUARTE the first responders when they are in need of further assistance. WWI Medals Pg. 7 To help accomplish this mission, Gary Hood Returned To Family has generously donated a support trailer to the Sierra Madre CERT. Perhaps you saw it at EDUCATION & YOUTH the Fourth of July parade. The trailer will be Local Students In The Pg. 8 furnished with an assortment of equipment, Spotlight emergency supplies and also serve as an operational facility. FOOD & DRINK Pg.9 To further educate the community the Sierra Madre CERT conducts monthly meetings is which there is a CERT training session.
    [Show full text]
  • Throughout the World, Human Skin Color Has Evolved to Be Dark
    AFEATURE ARTICLE FROM... OCTOBER 2002 Throughout the world, human skin color has evolved to be dark enough to prevent sunlight from destroy'ng the nutrient folate but light e ough to foster the production of vitamin By Nina G. Jablonski and George Chaplin Among primates, only humans have a mostly naked skin that comes in different colors. Geogra­ phers and anthropologists have long recognized that the distribution of skin colors among indigenous popula­ tions is not random: darker peoples tend to be found nearer the equator, lighter ones closer to the poles. For years, the prevailing theory has been that darker skins evolved to protect against skin cancer. But a series of dis­ coveries has led us to construct a new framework for understanding the evolutionary basis of variations in hu­ man skin color. Recent epidemiological and physiological evidence suggests to us that the worldwide pattern ofhuman skin color is the product of natural selection acting to regulate the effects ofthe sun's ultraviolet (UV) radiation on key nutrients crucial to reproductive success. From Hirsute to Hairless THE EVOLUTION OF SKIN PIGMENTAnON is linked with that ofhairlessness, and to comprehend both these stories, we need to page back in human history. Human beings have been evolving as an independent lineage of apes since at least seven million years ago, when our immediate ancestors diverged from those of our closest relatives, chim­ panzees. Because chimpanzees have changed less over time than humans have, they can provide an idea of what human anatomy and physiology must have been like. Chimpanzees' skin is light in color and is covered by hair over most of their bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthro Notes : National Museum of Natural History Bulletin for Teachers
    AnthroNotes Volume 32 No. 1 Spring 2011 WHY HUMAN SKIN COMES IN COLORS by Nina G. JabIonski look at a of predicted skin pigmentation, pigmentation provides one of the best examples map human we Skin find that all people are varying shades of brown. The in- of evolution by natural selection acting on the human tensity of their brownness and their ability to tan is related body. The fact that skin color has been so responsive to the UVR in the place where their ancestors came from. to evolutionary forces is fascinating, and one that is impor- societies tant for modern human to understand. Similar In the last 1 0,000 years, we have gotten better and skin colors — both dark and light — have evolved indepen- better at protecting ourselves against the extremes of UVR dently multiple times in human history. When we think of by cultural means. Sewn clothing and constructed shelters how races have been defined in the past using skin color, now protect us from strong sunlight and augment the pro- we can immediately see the problem. When the same skin tection afforded by natural melanin pigmentation. In far color has evolved many times independently in different northern environments, diets composed of vitamin D-rich places, its value as a unique maker of identity is eliminated foods like oily fish and marine mammals supplement the and the race so defined is rendered nonsensical. We are all vitamin D we can make in our skin under low UVR con- "hue-mans"! ditions. The major problem we face today is that we are able to travel so far so fast.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics of Hair and Skin Color
    11 Sep 2003 14:51 AR AR201-GE37-04.tex AR201-GE37-04.sgm LaTeX2e(2002/01/18) P1: GCE 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143233 Annu. Rev. Genet. 2003. 37:67–90 doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143233 Copyright c 2003 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved First published online as a Review in Advance on June 17, 2003 GENETICS OF HAIR AND SKIN COLOR Jonathan L. Rees Systems Group, Dermatology, University of Edinburgh, Lauriston Buildings, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh, EH3 9YW, United Kingdom; email: [email protected] Key Words melanin, melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R), eumelanin, pheomelanin, red hair ■ Abstract Differences in skin and hair color are principally genetically deter- mined and are due to variation in the amount, type, and packaging of melanin polymers produced by melanocytes secreted into keratinocytes. Pigmentary phenotype is genet- ically complex and at a physiological level complicated. Genes determining a number of rare Mendelian disorders of pigmentation such as albinism have been identified, but only one gene, the melanocortin 1 receptor (MCR1), has so far been identified to explain variation in the normal population such as that leading to red hair, freckling, and sun-sensitivity. Genotype-phenotype relations of the MC1R are reviewed, as well as methods to improve the phenotypic assessment of human pigmentary status. It is argued that given advances in model systems, increases in technical facility, and the lower cost of genotype assessment, the lack of standardized phenotype assessment is now a major limit on advance. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 68 BIOLOGY OF HUMAN PIGMENTATION ................................ 69 by San Jose State University on 10/05/10.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia
    World Heritage papers41 HEADWORLD HERITAGES 4 Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia VOLUME I In support of UNESCO’s 70th Anniversary Celebrations United Nations [ Cultural Organization Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia Nuria Sanz, Editor General Coordinator of HEADS Programme on Human Evolution HEADS 4 VOLUME I Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and the UNESCO Office in Mexico, Presidente Masaryk 526, Polanco, Miguel Hidalgo, 11550 Ciudad de Mexico, D.F., Mexico. © UNESCO 2015 ISBN 978-92-3-100107-9 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Cover Photos: Top: Hohle Fels excavation. © Harry Vetter bottom (from left to right): Petroglyphs from Sikachi-Alyan rock art site.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Diversity: the Science You Need to Know to Explain Why Race
    SGOXXX10.1177/2158244015611712SAGE OpenMcChesney 611712research-article2015 Article SAGE Open October-December 2015: 1 –13 Teaching Diversity: The Science You © The Author(s) 2015 DOI: 10.1177/2158244015611712 Need to Know to Explain Why Race Is sgo.sagepub.com Not Biological Kay Young McChesney1 Abstract This article is targeted to faculty teaching race and ethnicity, racism, diversity, and multicultural courses. Many students equate race with skin color. The premise of this article is that to teach students about the social construction of race, teachers must first know enough science to teach students that race is not biological. This article examines the biology of race by showing how advances in DNA sequencing led to genetics research that supports arguments that race is not biological. DNA comparisons show that all human populations living today are one species that came from Africa. The article explains the migration of humans out of Africa about 60,000 years ago and how they populated Australia, then Asia, Europe, and the Americas. The article shows how recent research maps the timing of the migration and admixture of specific population groups into Europe and India. The article shows how a mutation in one nucleotide can result in a trait like blue eyes, or Hemoglobin S (which confers resistance to malaria), which can be subject to evolution through natural selection. DNA comparisons show how natural selection shaped the genetics of human skin color to adapt to less UV light in the northern latitudes of Europe and Asia. The article shows that there is no relation between skin color or other “racial” characteristics and complex traits like intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetics of Human Skin and Hair Pigmentation
    GG20CH03_Pavan ARjats.cls July 31, 2019 17:4 Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics The Genetics of Human Skin and Hair Pigmentation William J. Pavan1 and Richard A. Sturm2 1Genetic Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA; email: [email protected] 2Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4102, Australia; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2019. 20:41–72 Keywords First published as a Review in Advance on melanocyte, melanogenesis, melanin pigmentation, skin color, hair color, May 17, 2019 genome-wide association study, GWAS The Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics is online at genom.annualreviews.org Abstract https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-083118- Human skin and hair color are visible traits that can vary dramatically Access provided by University of Washington on 09/02/19. For personal use only. 015230 within and across ethnic populations. The genetic makeup of these traits— Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2019.20:41-72. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org Copyright © 2019 by Annual Reviews. including polymorphisms in the enzymes and signaling proteins involved in All rights reserved melanogenesis, and the vital role of ion transport mechanisms operating dur- ing the maturation and distribution of the melanosome—has provided new insights into the regulation of pigmentation. A large number of novel loci involved in the process have been recently discovered through four large- scale genome-wide association studies in Europeans, two large genetic stud- ies of skin color in Africans, one study in Latin Americans, and functional testing in animal models.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Determinants of Skin Color, Aging, and Cancer Genetische Determinanten Van Huidskleur, Huidveroudering En Huidkanker
    Genetic Determinants of Skin Color, Aging, and Cancer Genetische determinanten van huidskleur, huidveroudering en huidkanker Leonie Cornelieke Jacobs Layout and printing: Optima Grafische Communicatie, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Cover design: Annette van Driel - Kluit © Leonie Jacobs, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of the author or, when appropriate, of the publishers of the publications. ISBN: 978-94-6169-708-0 Genetic Determinants of Skin Color, Aging, and Cancer Genetische determinanten van huidskleur, huidveroudering en huidkanker Proefschrift Ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam op gezag van rector magnificus Prof. dr. H.A.P. Pols en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties. De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op vrijdag 11 september 2015 om 11:30 uur door Leonie Cornelieke Jacobs geboren te Rotterdam PROMOTIECOMMISSIE Promotoren: Prof. dr. T.E.C. Nijsten Prof. dr. M. Kayser Overige leden: Prof. dr. H.A.M. Neumann Prof. dr. A.G. Uitterlinden Prof. dr. C.M. van Duijn Copromotor: dr. F. Liu COntents Chapter 1 General introduction 7 PART I SKIn COLOR Chapter 2 Perceived skin colour seems a swift, valid and reliable measurement. 29 Br J Dermatol. 2015 May 4; [Epub ahead of print]. Chapter 3 Comprehensive candidate gene study highlights UGT1A and BNC2 37 as new genes determining continuous skin color variation in Europeans. Hum Genet. 2013 Feb; 132(2): 147-58. Chapter 4 Genetics of skin color variation in Europeans: genome-wide association 59 studies with functional follow-up.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaking of Culture
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Textbooks Open Texts 2017 Speaking of Culture Nolan Weil Utah State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/oer_textbooks Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Weil, Nolan, "Speaking of Culture" (2017). Textbooks. 4. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/oer_textbooks/4 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Texts at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Textbooks by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Speaking of Culture Nolan Weil bution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. Speaking of Culture by Nolan Weil is Speaking of Culture by Nolan Weil is licensed under a Creative Commons Attri- licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 Contents A Note to Students 7 Introduction 1 Chapter 1: What is Culture? 7 History of the word 8 A flourishing enterprise 10 Seven contemporary themes in the treatment of culture 11 Final reflection 12 Application 14 Chapter 2: The Human Family 19 Origins and Diversity of Humanity 20 Where did we all come from? 23 The Multiregional Origin Hypothesis 23 The Recent African Origin Hypothesis 24 But why do we all look so different on the surface? 27 Race is not a biologically meaningful concept 31 Final Reflection 36 Application 36 Chapter 3: Origins of Culture 39 Culture as a product of human activity 40 Paleolithic material culture 41 Stone tools 43 Carved Figurines 47
    [Show full text]
  • Human Skin Color: Evidence for Selection Activity Educator Materials
    Human Skin Color: Evidence for Selection Activity Educator Materials OVERVIEW This activity supports the viewing of the short film The Biology of Skin Color. Students watch the film in segments and use real data to propose hypotheses, make predictions, and justify claims with evidence. KEY CONCEPTS • Within a population, heritable traits that provide a survival and reproductive advantage in a particular environment are more likely than other traits to be passed on to the next generation and thus tend to become more common over time. These traits are known as adaptations. • Human populations living in different parts of the world have different sets of evolutionary adaptations. These include wide-ranging variations in the way people look, especially with respect to skin color. • Evidence from different disciplines can inform what makes a human trait beneficial or harmful in a particular environment. • Evolution involves tradeoffs; a change in a gene that results in an adaptation to one aspect of the environment may be linked to a disadvantage with respect to another aspect of that same environment. STUDENT LEARNING TARGETS • Make predictions and propose hypotheses based on available information; and • Use real data presented in scientific figures and information from the film to make evidence-based claims. CURRICULUM CONNECTIONS Standards Curriculum Connection NGSS (2013) HS-LS1-1, HS-LS4-1, HS-LS4-2, HS-LS4-4 AP Bio (2015) 1.A.1, 1.A.2, 1.A.4, 1.C.3, 3.C.1, 4.C.2, SP1, SP5, SP6 IB Bio (2016) 5.1, 5.2, D.1 AP Env Sci (2013) II.C, III.B.1 IB Env Systems and Societies (2017) 8.1 Common Core (2010) ELA.RST.9-12.4, WHST.9-12.9 Vision and Change (2009) CC1, CC2 KEY TERMS evolution, folate, human evolution, melanin, natural selection, skin, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, vitamin D TIME REQUIREMENTS • Two 50-minute class periods or one 90-min block period.
    [Show full text]
  • Chimpanzeest Flexible Targeted Helping Based on an Understanding
    Chimpanzees’ flexible targeted helping based on an understanding of conspecifics’ goals Shinya Yamamotoa,1, Tatyana Humleb, and Masayuki Tanakac aPrimate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi 4848506, Japan; bSchool of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NR, United Kingdom; and cWildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 6068203, Japan Edited by Frans B. M. de Waal, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, and approved January 5, 2012 (received for review June 1, 2011) Humans extensively help others altruistically, which plays an nonhuman animals are lacking. If and how the animals un- important role in maintaining cooperative societies. Although derstand the others’ goals and help others effectively are core some nonhuman animals are also capable of helping others questions that have to be examined if we are ever to deepen our altruistically, humans are considered unique in our voluntary understanding of the evolution of cooperation. helping and our variety of helping behaviors. Many still believe Among those animal species known to demonstrate targeted that this is because only humans can understand others’ goals due helping, chimpanzees, one of our closest living relatives, help to our unique “theory of mind” abilities, especially shared inten- others upon request, but seldom voluntarily in contexts requiring tionality. However, we know little of the cognitive mechanisms assistance provisioning (12, 13). This concurs with observations underlying helping in nonhuman animals, especially if and how of food sharing among chimpanzees in the wild (16, 17). In- they understand others’ goals. The present study provides the terestingly, in our previous experiments (12), observation of a empirical evidence for flexible targeted helping depending on conspecific in trouble did not elicit chimpanzees’ helping be- conspecifics’ needs in chimpanzees.
    [Show full text]