DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation Form of World Biosphere Reserve [January, 2013]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation Form of World Biosphere Reserve [January, 2013] Evaluation Form of World Biosphere reserve [January, 2013] Preface In accordance with the 28 C/2.4 resolution in the Law Framework of “Plan for Man and Biosphere” passed in the Twenty-eighth Conference of the UNESCO, Article 4 specifies the standards that should be abided by regions, designated as biosphere reserves. Besides, Article 9 stipulates that a ten-year evaluation is conducted every nine years which is based on the report prepared by authorities concerned and the result will be submitted to the Secretariat of countries concerned. Attachment 3 encloses texts related to Law Framework. This form helps countries prepare the state reports stipulated by Article 9, and updates data so that the Secretariat can obtain data related to biosphere reserves. This report must be helpful for the ICC of MAB to inspect biosphere reserves, and to see whether standards specified in the Article 9, especially the three functions are fulfilled. What must be noted is that how biosphere reserves fulfill all standards is required to be pointed out in the last part (standards and job schedule). Information from this ten-year evaluation will be used by the UNESCO for the following objectives: (a) Serves the inspection of biosphere reserves conducted by the ICC and departments related to the ICC of MAB: (b) Serves global information systems, especially networks and publications of Man and Biosphere by the UNESCO so as to facilitate the exchange between different people with a focus on biosphere reserves and exert a mutual impact. If any part of this report has a necessity to be confidential, please specify. This form is composed of the following three parts: y Part 1 is the abstract, focusing on pointing out that the major changes took place during the period of the report. y Part 2 gives a detailed narration which is related to properties of humankind, physics and biology, and systems. y Part 3 consists of two attachments (A), Attachment 1(A.1) being used to update the contents of biosphere reserves in the MAB network and Attachment 2 to provide the fax number and communication materials related to biosphere reserves (A.2.). Attachment 3 is the law framework of the network of World Biosphere reserve. Please provide a maximum of materials and supportive documents, especially: ¾ A clear map (refer to 2.3.1); ¾ Law texts in terms of regions Application forms should be filled in English, French or Spanish. Two pieces of them must be submitted to the Secretariat, and specific provisions are as follows: 1. The original or copy has an original signature, a certificate of approval, a regional map and supportive documents. Documents are submitted to the Secretariat via an official channel of the UNESCO such as the National Council of the UNESCO and its permanent delegates: 2. An evaluation form and an electronic version (a floppy disc and CD) of map. The electronic one can be directly sent to the Secretariat of Man and Biosphere: UNESCO Department of Ecology and Geo-science 1, rue Miollis F-75352 Paris Cedex 15, France (Paris, France) Telephone Number: + 33 (0) 1 45 68 40 67 Fax Number: + 33 (0) 1 45 68 58 04 E-mail: [email protected] www.unesco.org/mab 2 Contents Part 1: Contents Part 2: A Ten-year Evaluation Report 1. Biosphere reserve 5 2. Changes in the biosphere reserve over the past ten years: 6 3 . Ecosystem services: 13 4. Protection functions: 14 5. Development function: 19 6 . logistic function: 21 7. Biosphere reserve management and coordination: 26 8. Standards and Job Schedule: 32 9. Supportive documents 38 10 . Address 39 Attachments Attachment 1: Contents of the Man and Biosphere Network of the Biosphere reserve 30 Attachment 2: Materials of Publicity and Communication 35 Attachment 3: Law Framework of the World Network of the Biosphere Reserve 40 UNESCO- MAB Program – Ten years evaluation for the biosphere reserve——Jan.2013 3 Part 1 Abstract (a) Name of the biosphere reserve: Dalai Lake Biosphere reserve (b) Country: China (c) Time of passing: December 16, 2002 (d) Time of former evaluations: No (e) If your answer is yes, please show the viewpoints of the former evaluations from the MAB- ICC: None (f) What follow-ups were adopted; if they are not completed/ launched, please explain it. None (g) Improvements of the measures to fulfill the biosphere reserve’s objectives. None (h) Please brief on the schedule of this ten-year evaluation Summarize the ten-year work of Dalai Lake Biosphere reserve →fill and submit the “Evaluation Form of World Biosphere reserve” to the Department of Ecology and Geo- science of the UNESCO → accept an evaluation notice from the Secretariat of China Committee, World Biosphere, the UNESCO → commence preparing the ten-year evaluation conference of the World Biosphere reserve → decide on leaders of the National Council of Man and Biosphere of China and members of its panel to be invited to this evaluation activity (i) Areas and space configuration: Data of last Recommended changes report( nomination or If recommended evaluation form) （ ） Acreage of the core area of 75791hm2 None land Acreage of the Buffer Area of 38534hhm2 None land Acreage of the transitional 625675hm2 None area of land Acreage of the core area of None None ocean Acreage of the buffer area of None None ocean Acreage of the transitional None None area of ocean 1.Population in the biosphere reserve: Data of last Current data（please explain report(nomination or the date from census or other evaluation form) sources） Core area (permanent and 106/0 13 families…28 seasonal) UNESCO- MAB Program – Ten years evaluation for the biosphere reserve——Jan.2013 4 Buffer area（permanent and 236/57 133 families/…266 seasonal） Transitional area（permanent 11020/750 A total of 650 families， and seasonal） 1579/192 2. Ongoing or planned budgets (fund and main sources of the special fund), international, regional or national projects/plans. Budget and data of last Current budget report(nomination or evaluation form ) Source of fund: a total of 800,000 Source of fund: the central government, The yuan from the country, the Department of Forestry of Inner Mongolia autonomous region and the local Autonomous Region and Hulun Buir City. government; Their corresponding Annual budget proportions are 19%, 6%, and A total of Ten years （2003——2012） 75%. A total investment of 53,750,000 yuan includes the following parts: Fund for basic construction from the central government is 18,670,000 yuan, accounting for 34.74% of the total amount; Special fund for wetland protection from the central government is 6,000,000 yuan, taking up 11.16% of the total amount; Special subsidy fund from the central government is 1,400,000 yuan, occupying 2.60 % of the total amount; Special subsidy fund from the Department of Forestry of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region is 1,460,000 yuan, 2.71% of the total amount; Supporting fund for basic construction from the Reserve is 1,900,000 yuan, 3.54% of the total amount; Fund from the Hulun buir City is 24,320,000 yuan, 45.25% of the total amount。 Among them, 18,880,000 yuan goes to personnel fund, 3,660,000 to public fund and 1,830,000 yuan to special fund. Annual budget of 2012 Annual budget totals 11,090,000 yuan. Among them, fund for basic construction from the central government is 6,220,000 yuan, 56.09% of the total amount; Fund from the Hulun Buir City is 4,870,000 yuan, 43.91% of the total amount. Among them, 4,080,000 yuan goes to personnel fund, 570,000 yuan to public fund and 210,000 yuan to special fund. UNESCO- MAB Program – Ten years evaluation for the biosphere reserve——Jan.2013 5 3. International, regional, bilateral or multilateral cooperation framework. If applicable, please explain the contributions the biosphere reserve made to attaining objectives, and putting the development mechanisms of documents into use such as international and regional bilateral or multilateral treaties and conventions. a. On March 29, 1994, a treaty related to the establishment of a common nature reserve among China, Mongolia and Russia was signed among the Bureau of Environmental Protection of PRC, the Ministry of Nature and Environmental Protection and the Ministry of Nature Conservation and Natural Resources of Russian Federation; b. On December 26, 2005, a treaty aimed to establish sister reserve ties was signed between Dalai Lake World Biosphere reserve of Inner Mongolia and Xishuangbanna World Biosphere reserve of Yunnan; c. On April 5, 2006, a cooperation agreement aimed to make concerted efforts to establish a meteorological wetland monitoring station was signed between Hulun Buir Bureau of Meteorology and Dalai Lake State Nature Reserve Administration Bureau of Inner Mongolia; d. On October 1, 2007, a treaty was signed among ten wetland reserves such as Dalai Lake Nature Reserve of Inner Mongolia, Zhalong Nature Reserve of Helongjiang, Sanjiang Nature Reserve of Helongjiang, Shuangtai Hekou Nature Reserve of Liaoning, Yellow River Delta Nature Reserve, Dongtan Nature Reserve of Chongming, Boyang Lake Nature Reserve of Jiangxi, Southern Dongting Lake Nature Reserve of Hunan, Neilingding Futian Nature Reserve of Guangdong and Dongzhaigang Nature reserve of Hainan, forming” a sister reserve network of southern China migratory birds”; e. On May 28, 2008, an cooperation memo of the management of the park and the nature reserve of the department of entertainment was signed between the Department of Forestry of Inner Mongolia of PRC and Alberta Tourism of Canada; f. On September 25, 2010, a treaty was signed between Dalai Lake Nature Reserve of Inner Mongolia and Shengjin Lake of Anhui, aimed to establish sister reserve ties; g.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Current Vegetation Data from the Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve
    Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e71266 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e71266 Data Paper Current vegetation data from the Prioksko- Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve Mikhail Shovkun‡, Natalya Ivanova§§, Larisa Khanina , Michael S. Romanov§‡, Vasily Demidov ‡ Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve, Danki, Russia § Institute of Mathematical Problems of Biology RAS – branch of the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia Corresponding author: Mikhail Shovkun ([email protected]), Natalya Ivanova ([email protected]), Larisa Khanina ([email protected]), Vasily Demidov ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ivan Chadin Received: 08 Jul 2021 | Accepted: 17 Aug 2021 | Published: 25 Aug 2021 Citation: Shovkun M, Ivanova N, Khanina L, Romanov MS, Demidov V (2021) Current vegetation data from the Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e71266. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e71266 Abstract Background Here we present the sampling event dataset that contributes to the knowledge of current vegetation of the Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve (part of the UNESCO World Network of Biosphere Reserves), Moscow Region, Russia. The Reserve is situated on the terraces of the Oka River in the zone of mixed coniferous forests. New information The dataset provides 269 relevés (9174 associated occurrences) of renewed vegetation collected in 2019-2020. It is aimed at sampling vegetation data from the Reserve area with particular interest to sites with invasive species and sites with recent deadfall in the spruce stands caused by the bark beetle-typographer. The dataset contains representative information on plant communities in localities with assigned GPS coordinates, sampled using the standard relevé method with the Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Reserve of Orange County
    NATURE RESERVE OF ORANGE COUNTY NEWS RELEASE For Immediate Release June 13, 2016 Irvine, California-- Between June 18 to June 24 and July 5 to July 12, the Nature Communities Coalition (NCC), in collaboration with OC Parks, Irvine Ranch Conservancy, and The Nature Conservancy will conduct an aerial weed survey during daylight hours using a small, low-flying helicopter to document and map the distribution of over 30 weed species located within selected inland parks and open space areas. The resulting information will provide details about the abundance and distribution of invasive weeds and help land managers evaluate the effectiveness of current weed monitoring practices, identify emerging weed problems, and strategically plan future weed management actions. Notices describing the aerial weed survey will be posted at trailheads at participating parks and open space areas during the project period. The aerial weed survey will be focused on mapping the distribution of artichoke thistle and a minimum of 30 other established and emerging invasive weeds which degrade natural habitat values important to wildlife and the park visitor experience. The survey will cover nearly 32,000 acres and involve the following land areas (also see attached map): Aerial Survey Area Ownership Whiting Ranch Wilderness Park OC Parks Siphon Reservoir Irvine Ranch Water District City of Irvine Open Space Preserve North City of Irvine Irvine Ranch Open Space OC Parks Irvine Regional Park OC Parks Peters Canyon Regional Park OC Parks Santiago Oaks Regional Park OC Parks Coal Canyon Ecological Reserve California Department of Fish and Wildlife -OVER- The aerial survey will be conducted by an experienced team, Wildlands Conservation Science LLC, using a small helicopter (Schweizer-333) and a crew of three (an experienced pilot and two biologists conducting the survey).
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Road Park Local Nature Reserve
    Bay Road Park Local Nature Reserve www.derrycity.gov.uk/biodiversity Bay Road Park Local Nature Reserve is a 20 ha former landfill site, located on the banks of the River Foyle, which provides impressive scenery of the Foyle Bridge, Foyle catchment and the City. It can Bay Road Park supports a wide range of habitats to include woodland, grassland, salt be accessed from the Foyle marsh and mudflats. These habitats support a wide range of species, with significant Bridge or behind Da Vinci’s population of wading and wintering birds, including six of Northern Ireland’s priority Hotel, off the Culmore Road. species: redshank, herring gull, song thrush, mistle thrush, starling and bullfinch. Also, international over-wintering birds feast on the eel grass and insects on the mudflats. The woodlands and wildflower meadows provide a habitat for a range of priority species, including eight species of butterflies, for example, orange tip, tortoiseshell, peacock and painted ladies. Also, the willow trees provide a habitat for the lunar hornet moth, which mimics the behaviour of This riverside green space is managed by a wasp. The range of moths provide a Derry City Council for biodiversity and valuable source of food for the bats recreation, with a pedestrian and cycle that use the site for feeding. Two bat network. species have been recorded utilizing It was launched as Derry City Council’s first the site, Pipistrelle and Daubenton bats. Local Nature Reserve in June 2009, for its biodiversity, access, community involvement During your visit you may catch sight of a and educational value.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam: Van Long Nature Reserve
    Van Long Nature Reserve Vietnam Van Long – local fishers cast nets in the limestone fringed community wetland By Dao Nguyen May 2008 Executive summary Van Long Nature Reserve is situated in Gia Vien district along the Northeastern border of Ninh Binh Province. Van Long straddles seven communes (local Government administrative units) and is in the heartland of the populated centre of north-eastern Vietnam, 85km south of the capitol, Hanoi. All the 45,000 or so people who live in these seven communes in the buffer zone of Van Long are of the Kinh ethnic Vietnamese majority. Van Long itself covers some 3,000 hectares and comprises two major geographic features. Firstly, Van Long is a large wetland and freshwater system. Secondly, the canals, lakes and streams wend through an island-like landscape of karst limestone mountains that harbour the only viable population of the Delacour Langur - one of the world’s most critically endangered species of primate (with less than 200 individuals remaining, globally). Without the protection afforded Van Long by the local community, and now by the Government and local authorities, it is highly probable that the Delacour langur would be the first primate extinction of the 21st Century. The name Van Long dates back centuries, and the community has evidenced a robust capacity to harness the natural resources of Van Long through decades of intense conflict and change, without diminishing their resource base. The cultural significance of the wetland-karst landscape is a vital part of local folklore and sense of place. With the outside discovery of the population of Delacour’s Langur in 1993, external attention to Van Long began to increase.
    [Show full text]
  • Insert Proposal Title
    STATUS QUO TECHNICAL NOTE ENVIRONMENT South Eastern District Local Area Plan 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 This Technical Note represents part of the Phase Two Deliverable for the South Eastern District Local Area Plan. 1.1 DETAILS OF THE STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................... 1 Contract No. SCM 66 of 11/12 2 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS QUO ............................................................................................................... 1 Prepared for: 2.1 AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE ......................................................................................................................... 1 Msunduzi Municipality 2.2 GEOLOGY, SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 3 2.2.1 Topography ................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.2 Geology ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.3 Soils, Land Cover and Land Capability ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 BIODIVERSITY .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3A Land Use
    Section 3A Land Use 3A.1 Summary The following is a summary of the proposed project’s potential impacts to land use, any necessary mitigation measures, and the level of significance after mitigation. Significance Potential Impact Mitigation Measure(s) after mitigation SANTIAGO HILLS II PLANNED COMMUNITY Potential Impact 3A-1. No mitigation was included in 2000 SEIR 1278. Less than Division of Established No new mitigation is required. significant Community Potential Impact 3A-2. MM-LU-1 from 2000 SEIR 1278 has been implemented by the Less than Conflict with Applicable Land proposed project and would no longer be applicable. (For significant Use Plans MM-LU-2 from 2000 SEIR 1278, see Section 3I, Visual Resources.) 2000 SEIR 1278 mitigation measure that has been partially implemented by the proposed project but the remainder continues to be applicable: MM LU-3. Limit grading (implemented), prepare tree survey (implemented), and provide tree replacement and monitoring to reduce impacts to Irvine Regional Park. No new mitigation is required. Potential Impact 3A-3. No mitigation was included in 2000 SEIR 1278. Less than Conflict with Applicable HCP or No new mitigation is required. significant NCCP EAST ORANGE PLANNED COMMUNITY – AREA 1 Potential Impact 3A-1. No mitigation is required. Less than Division of Established significant Community Potential Impact 3A-2. No mitigation is required. Less than Conflict with Applicable Land significant Use Plans Potential Impact 3A-3. No mitigation is required. Less than Conflict with Applicable HCP or significant NCCP EAST ORANGE PLANNED COMMUNITY – AREAS 2 AND 3 AND REMAINING AREAS Potential Impact 3A-1.
    [Show full text]
  • E-367 Georgia
    E-367 GEORGIA PROTECTED AREAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Environmental Assessment, Environmental Management Plan 1. Introduction. The Government of Georgia (GoG) has requested that the International Public Disclosure Authorized Development Association (the Bank) provide support through the Global Environment Facility (GEF) for a Protected Areas Development Project. This Project will help the GoG to improve the conservation and sustainable use of Georgian biodiversity. 2. The project will: (i) establish three protected areas in eastern Georgia; (ii) facilitate the creation of a national network of protected areas; (iii) integrate biodiversity conservation into forestry, range management, and agriculture; (iv) strengthen institutions responsible for biodiversity conservation programs; (iv) improve public awareness of the values and importance of Georgian biodiversity; and (v) promote regional / international cooperation for conservation of biodiversity in the Caucasus region. 3. The Implementing Agency for the Project is the Georgia Department of Protected Areas. Financing for Project preparation commenced in March, 1999. Significant analysis and Public Disclosure Authorized proposals for Project financing were developed in partnership with the Department of Protected Areas administrations of three proposed project sites (Vashlovani, Lagodekhi and Tusheti); NGOs; the scientific community, international experts, and Georgian governmental institutions (Ministry of Environment). During project preparation, an environmental review identified the potential impacts of project activities and elaborated environmental review and management plan to be undertaken during project implementation. 4. The results of the environmental review and the recommended environmental management plan were the subject of public consultations held for each protected area site between June 12 and 14,2000. Comments were recorded in minutes (see Annex 5, Summary of Consultations; full minutes are available in Georgian from the Project Implementation Unit).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary on Marine and Coastal Protected Areas in NOWPAP Region
    Summary on Marine and Coastal Protected Areas in NOWPAP Region (NOWPAP DINRAC, March 2010) 1. Overview This summary is based on the Database on Coastal and Marine Nature Reserves in the Northwest Pacific Region (NowpapNatureReserve, http://dinrac.nowpap.org/NowpapNatureReserve.php) which is developed and maintained by NOWPAP DINRAC. The data was collected and provided by the National Focal Points of DINRAC started from 2006 and updated periodically. The WDPA (World database of protected areas, http://www.wdpa-marine.org), and the Ramsar Sites Database (http://ramsar.wetlands.org) were also taken as reference. The summary intends to give an overview and understanding on current situation of marine and coastal protected areas (MPAs) in NOWPAP region. The MPAs - marine and coastal protected areas comprise the nature reserves, national parks, wetland protected areas (Ramsar Sites) in NOWPAP Region. The sea area mainly covers the Yellow Sea and Eastern Area of NOWPAP region. Based on the existing data, there are total 87 MPAs in NOWPAP region covers an area of 4,090,046ha (Table 1 to Table 3). The earliest MPA was established in October 1916 and the latest was in August 2007 (Table 4). The smallest area is 10ha in Japan and largest area is 909,000ha in China (Table 5). Statistics tables and figures below are conducted on number, area, protected level, protected type and protected objectives (species) for MPAs in NOWPAP (Table 6 and Fig.1 to Fig.5). The list (List 1) and the location of the MPAs (Map 1) are listed individually. 2. Statistics Table 1. Number of MPAs in NOWPAP Region by Country Level Protected Type Country Total Wild Municipal/ Natural Nature Number National Provincial animal and County ecosystem heritage plant China 20 9 5 6 15 17 17 Japan 31 17 14 0 31 31 20 Korea 22 22 0 0 22 20 13 Russia 14 7 7 0 14 14 7 Region 87 55 26 6 82 82 57 1 Table 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Impendle Nature Reserve
    IMPENDLE NATURE RESERVE KwaZulu-Natal South Africa Protected Area Management Plan: Public Participation Report 2012 Prepared by Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife Protected Area Management Planning Unit TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS 2 1.1 The context of stakeholder consultation 2 1.2 Approach and objectives of the consultation process 2 1.3 Consultation process 4 2) KEY FINDINGS OF THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS 6 3) COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING REVIEW OF THE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN 7 REFERENCES APPENDIX A LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS WHO HAVE PARTICPATED IN OR BEEN INVITED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PREPARATION OF THE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR IMPENDLE NATURE RESERVE APPENDIX B MINUTES OF ADDITIONAL MEETINGS AND DISCUSSIONS HELD ON 4TH SEPTEMBER 2012 APPENDIX C SCANS OF THE ADVERTISEMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC MEETING AND PUBLIC REVIEW OF THE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX D BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT CIRCULATED PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP APPENDIX E COPIES OF STANDARD INVITATIONS SENT TO KNOWN STAKEHOLDERS FOR THE PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP APPENDIX F MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP IMPENDLE NATURE RESE RVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 1 1) STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS The Impendle Nature Reserve en route to the Southern Drakensberg is situated approximately 15 km south from the town of Impendle in KZN with the main R617 road to Underberg passing through the reserve. It falls within the Ingwe Local Municipality and the Sisonke District Municipality and Impendle Local Municipality abuts the reserve along its northern border. Despite these boundaries the reserve is closer to the Impendle Local Municipality and the access to the reserve falls within this municipal area.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Codes for Each Court of Each Level
    Table of Codes for Each Court of Each Level Corresponding Type Chinese Court Region Court Name Administrative Name Code Code Area Supreme People’s Court 最高人民法院 最高法 Higher People's Court of 北京市高级人民 Beijing 京 110000 1 Beijing Municipality 法院 Municipality No. 1 Intermediate People's 北京市第一中级 京 01 2 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Shijingshan Shijingshan District People’s 北京市石景山区 京 0107 110107 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Municipality Haidian District of Haidian District People’s 北京市海淀区人 京 0108 110108 Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Mentougou Mentougou District People’s 北京市门头沟区 京 0109 110109 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Municipality Changping Changping District People’s 北京市昌平区人 京 0114 110114 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Yanqing County People’s 延庆县人民法院 京 0229 110229 Yanqing County 1 Court No. 2 Intermediate People's 北京市第二中级 京 02 2 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Dongcheng Dongcheng District People’s 北京市东城区人 京 0101 110101 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Xicheng District Xicheng District People’s 北京市西城区人 京 0102 110102 of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Fengtai District of Fengtai District People’s 北京市丰台区人 京 0106 110106 Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality 1 Fangshan District Fangshan District People’s 北京市房山区人 京 0111 110111 of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Daxing District of Daxing District People’s 北京市大兴区人 京 0115
    [Show full text]
  • State Party Report on the State of Conservation of the Ancient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe
    COORDINATION OFFICE E.C.O. Institute of Ecology Lakeside B07 b, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria [email protected] State Party Report on the State of Conservation of the Ancient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe submitted by Austria on behalf of the States Parties Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Italy, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Ukraine Reference Number: 1133ter in response to World Heritage Committee Decisions 42 COM 7B.71 and 43 COM 7B.13 [for submission by 1st February 2020] 1 COORDINATION OFFICE E.C.O. Institute of Ecology Lakeside B07 b, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria [email protected] Table of contents Glossary ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Executive summary of the report .................................................................................................... 8 2 Response to the Decision of the World Heritage Committee ......................................................... 9 2.1 Decision on legal protection status of Slovak component parts and logging in buffer zone (42 COM 7B.71 – 4).................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Decision on provision of legal protection on Slovak component parts (42 COM 7B.71 – 5) 10 2.3 Decision on Slovak proposal for boundary modifications (42 COM 7B.71 – 6) .................... 12 2.4 Decision
    [Show full text]
  • Imbalance in Spatial Accessibility to Primary and Secondary Schools in China: Guidance for Education Sustainability
    sustainability Article Imbalance in Spatial Accessibility to Primary and Secondary Schools in China: Guidance for Education Sustainability Yuan Gao 1, Qingsong He 1,*, Yaolin Liu 1,2,3,*, Lingyu Zhang 1, Haofeng Wang 1 and Enxiang Cai 1 1 School of Resource and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, 129Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China; [email protected] (Y.G.);[email protected] (L.Z.); [email protected] (H.W.); [email protected] (E.C.) 2 Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, 129Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China 3 Collaborative Innovation Center for Geospatial Information Technology, Wuhan 430079, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (Q.H.); [email protected] (Y.L.) Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen Received: 16 September 2016; Accepted: 23 November 2016; Published: 28 November 2016 Abstract: Compulsory education is an important aspect of the societal development. Meanwhile, education equality safeguards the effectiveness of education systems and is an important part of social equality. This study analyzes the inequality of compulsory education from the perspective of imbalanced spatial distribution. Unlike previous studies that have measured the spatial distribution of education simply based on the spatial position of primary and secondary schools, we explore spatial accessibility based on the shortest travel distance from residents to schools, and then analyze the inequality of compulsory education through the distribution of spatial accessibility. We use 2873 Chinese counties as statistical units, and perform a statistical and graphical analysis of their spatial accessibility using the Theil index and spatial autocorrelation analyses. To analyze the differences in the spatial accessibility distribution on the national and regional levels, we use three partitioned modes: the terrain partitioned mode, the economic development partitioned mode, and the province-level partitioned mode.
    [Show full text]