DOCSLIB.ORG

Joe Higgin's Banking Inquiry Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joe Higgin's Banking Inquiry Report The Banking Inquiry Why Ireland Experienced a Systemic Banking Crisis Alternative Analysis and Conclusions to the Report of the Joint Oireachtas Committee of Inquiry into the Banking Crisis By Joe Higgins TD, Member of the Joint Committee1 January 27, 2016 Extreme Profiteering driven by corporate greed drove the property bubble and caused the crash; Bubble Governments of Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, Tánaiste Mary Harney, Finance Ministers McCreevy & Cowen served the interests of bankers/developers Not those of ordinary people; Enda Kenny, Fine Gael Leader, was a silent non Opposition Witness after witness at the Banking Inquiry, including bankers and developers themselves, attested to the kind of cut throat competition between them for profit that drove the reckless lending practices that inflated the property/banking bubble and led to the disastrous economic crash. Dermot Gleeson, the Chairman of AIB from 2003 to 2009 testified as to how his bank aped the methods of Anglo Irish Bank which was lending recklessly to developers and raking in major profits. He maintained that they had a problem of: Anglo being held up to us as an exemplar…Commentators in Ireland and abroad repeatedly said, “Anglo is the best bank. Why can’t you be more like Anglo?” It was determined by one international consultancy to be the best bank of its size in the world. It was the darling not just of the Irish but of European stock exchanges generally… Ethna Tinney, who was an independent Non-Executive Director of EBS 2000-2007, told the Inquiry: The belief that there were substantial profits to be made for the society from these developments led us to emulate our peers…There was a sort of feeding frenzy as the banks clambered over one another to get a piece of the action, especially as new foreign banks had entered the market as competitors…There was a sense that we were becoming a minnow as 1 With major technical assistance and research by Diana O’Dwyer 1 INBS expanded its lending and started to post profits that were up to five times the profits we were posting. Ms Tinney was highly critical of practices such as securitisation referring to herself having an image of it ‘as a shark eating its own entrails’ She further claimed that ‘The banks have absolutely no sense of guilt about what they have done. And if left unchecked, they are going to do it all over again.’ The extreme drive for profits was encapsulated in the figures given to the Inquiry whereby the six banks eventually covered by the Guarantee, increased lending exponentially from €120 billion in 2000 to almost €400 billion by 2007, raked in €25 billion in profits from 2002 to 2008 and paid those banks Chief Executives an astounding total of €71 million in salaries and bonuses. This was then adversely mirrored in the disastrous €65 billion these banks lost in the crash. The political leaders of the Fianna Fail/ Progressive Democrat Government 1997 -2007 relentlessly pushed the deregulation in financial services that resulted in this competitive race to the bottom in banking standards as major banks vied for profits. Taoiseach Bertie Ahern told an Irish Banking Federation lunch in March 2006; ‘the Government is very conscious of its role in assisting you to maintain a healthy bottom line . .there is a need to be more balanced and less negative about the essential services you provide.’ In March 2007, Mr Ahern was positively touting Ireland as a deregulated state for bankers when he told a breakfast meeting of the Financial Services Industry in New York, ‘Our commitment to supporting foreign direct investment is absolute. Ireland is very lightly regulated compared with most of our European colleagues.’ Brian Cowen who became Finance Minister in 2004, was as enthusiastic as his Leader. In a speech to the Institute of Bankers in Ireland annual dinner on 2 November 2006, he said: But, in my view it is the innovation coming from within the sector which is the most remarkable driver of change. Increasingly sophisticated derivative products seem to be arriving daily as a sector seeks to become ever more professional in the way it manages and hedges its risks and chases after that elusive higher yield. Billionaire Warren Buffet described the same derivative products as ‘time bombs’ and ‘weapons of mass destruction. Brian Cowen continued in what can only be described as an embarrassingly obsequious tone: Of course, not all of these brave new initiatives are successful. It’s a hard game, but there’s all to play for. Of course, that’s easy for me to say because you are players on the field and I’m just an ardent supporter on the sidelines. I will continue to wear your colours. Mr Cowen’s predecessor, Charlie McCreevy, who was Finance Minister from 1997 to 2004 agreed at the Inquiry that he was a ‘champion of the free capitalist markets’. He told the Financial Regulator in 2005 (now as EU Commissioner): Don’t try to protect everyone from every possible accident. .many of us in this room . were part of the ‘unregulated generation’ – the generation that has produced some of the best risk takers, problem solvers and inventors. 2 The biggest political party in opposition in the Dail during the bubble was Fine Gael. At his appearance at the Inquiry, Enda Kenny, Fine Gael Leader from 2002, wasn’t in a position to point to a single instance where he had demanded restrictions or regulation on the profiteering that was rampant in the property market. Dismal failure of Central Bank/Financial Regulator rooted in deregulation mindset of Fianna Fail/PD Government; Regulator must take full measure of responsibility but political establishment must not be allowed to scapegoat: I have no doubt that the Report of the Joint Committee which finds that the Regulator took no enforcement action against any banks for excessive lending between 2000 and 2008 will be seized on opportunistically by the political establishment – especially Fianna Fail and the Progressive Democrats – to make the Regulator the scapegoat for the bubble and crash. In fact the evidence available to the Committee demonstrated that the most senior politicians of the day championed rampant deregulation in the financial services sector to enable the banks to make massive profits. In 2003, the Fianna Fail/PD Government, gave the Financial Regulator a legal responsibility for the expansion of the financial services sector while at the same time being supposed to regulate it. This gave rise to the spectacle of the Regulator organising international ‘roadshows’ to tout for international banks coming to Ireland at the same time as it was supposed to control their profit seeking activities. In fact assisting the banks to make super profits was a constant concern of these politicians. It shouldn’t come as a surprise then that the Financial Regulator was promulgating the same message as the Government to which it was responsible when it said in 2005; ‘We as Regulator, will not introduce or impose unnecessary regulatory burdens that will affect the continued competitiveness of our financial industry and will minimise the impact of such burdens coming from Europe.’ Again in its 2006 Annual Report the Regulator showed it was merely carrying out the wishes of the political leadership when it stated, we design and operate a regulatory regime conducive to an internationally competitive financial services industry . that is profitable and growing in both the domestic sector and the international sector based in Ireland. We provide world class service to financial institutions in all our dealing with them. In not regulating, the Regulators were taking their lead from the political leadership of the State. On top of that, and really because of it, the numbers of staff assigned to track the major banks was derisory. Mary Burke, who was Head of Supervision at the Financial Regulator gave evidence to the Inquiry that only three FR staff members had responsibility for Bank of Ireland and Anglo combined while only two were tracking Allied Irish Banks and IL&P. 3 Government supposed to put interest of ordinary citizens first but FF/PD Government betrayed that trust to serve interest of bankers/speculators At Election time the major political parties pledge to represent the interests of the majority in the State, the ordinary men women and children who make up society. During the property bubble the FF/PD Government utterly perverted that pledge. The workings of the capitalist market allow cabals in the financial markets and in the property industry to gamble for super profits if conditions allow. It is considered a right to engage in flagrant speculation in building land even if this enriches the speculator at enormous cost to society. This was central to the rocketing of house prices in the bubble which evidence to the Inquiry showed increased stunningly by the equivalent of the average industrial wage EACH year for the ten years from 1996 to 2006. The championing of deregulation in the financial markets by such as Bertie Ahern and Brian Cowen and which gave financiers free reign to profit at the expense of society was enshrined in legislation. The laws that legitimised speculation and profiteering and the personal and corporate greed involved, were fashioned in Dáil Éireann under successive governments and voted for by the majority of Dáil deputies and Senators because they were believers and advocates for the capitalist ethos that underpins the economic system in which those markets play a pivotal role. When questioned about the nature of their relationship with property developers as illustrated by their annual outing to the Galway Races and the Fianna Fail hospitality tent, the former Fianna Fail Leaders strongly denied that they were in any way influenced by the demands of property developers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Wars in Ireland
    new masses: ireland and armenia In this number, nlr’s ‘New Masses, New Media’ series examines the character of the recent protests in Armenia and Ireland, both sparked by price hikes for basic goods: electricity in one case, water in the other. Comparable in population—4.5m and 3m, respectively—Ireland as a whole is three times the size of Armenia. Historically, both have been shaped by their location between two imperial powers: Britain and America, Turkey and Russia. If there is an eerie parallel in the numbers estimated to have perished in the Irish Famine and the Armenian Genocide—between 800,000 and a million—the deliberately exterminationist policies of the Young Turks are of a different order of political and moral malignity to the laissez-faire arrogance of English colonialism. A mark of these dark pasts, in both cases the diaspora significantly outweighs the domestic population. In recent times, both countries have figured on the margin of larger economic unions, the eu and cis; as a result, their trajectories in the 1990s were diametrically opposed. Armenia had been a high-end industrial hub within the Soviet Union, specializing in machine goods and electronic products. Already hit by the 1988 earthquake, its economy suffered one of the sharpest contractions of the former ussr as industrial disruption was exacerbated by war and blockade. From $2.25bn in 1990, Armenian gdp dropped to $1.2bn in 1993; it did not recover to its Soviet-era level until 2002. By that time, the population had fallen by 15 per cent, from 3.54m in 1990 to barely 3m; by 2013 it was down to 2.97m.
    [Show full text]
  • Joe Higgins Katie Taylor John Herlihy Ronan O'gara Joe Duffy
    22 W H O ’S W H O I N S PI R I N G H O P E I N A N AT IO N I N T U R M OI L Sunday Independent 28 November 2010 ‘Carpe JOE HIGGINS JOHN HERLIHY diem’ Incorruptible Trotskyist with a sense of humour Google chief is far OE Higgins too busy to be seen always has a dining with the - Jill Jtwinkle in his social partners eye. He will be puzzled to see his Bell name favoured on OHN Herlihy this list. If he were would turn green at naming sworn Jhis appearance on opponents of his the same roll of honour ideology, mine might as Joe Higgins. Herlihy not be far from the is an unlikely poster top. But Joe has a boy for entrepreneurial gritty, incorruptible Irish business. He approach to politics followed a conventional ‘You've unmatched by any TD road to head up one of in the last 30 years. the most dynamic His consistency is companies in Ireland. always unique, verging on After a BComm in nobility. UCD he became a After promising to chartered accountant another donate half his TD's with the stuffed shirts salary to his Socialist at KPMG. After that, Party and its ideals, John relocated to the chance’ following his election in 1997, he did exactly that, confounding the US, taking the road of political cynics. His interventions in the Dail during his 10-year term technology, working in there were unbending in his Trotskyist approach, but peppered with a Oracle, PeopleSoft and Adobe systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Political Review, December 2008
    Historians? Irish Times Censors Never Mind Lisbon. Brendan Clifford SIPTU on Budget What About London? Manus O'Riordan Labour Comment page 14 page 5 back page IRISH POLITICAL REVIEW ecember 2008 Vol.23, No.12 ISSN 0790-7672 and Northern Star incorporating Workers' Weekly Vol.22 No.12 ISSN 954-5891 War And Remembrance Budget 2009: Nationalist Ireland has this year celebrated the 90th anniversary of its victory in the End of an Era? Great War. All the stops were pulled out to glorify it and make us forget what it was. A fashionable theory about nations, advocated by Professor Comerford of Maynooth amongst many, is that they are "invented" by forgetfulness of their actual past and This was the first budget in more than mythical remembrance of a past that never was. Whatever about nations, that is certainly 20 years that was prepared in the context of recession and rapidly deteriorating .the way that the Great War is having greatness restored to it. At the end of the Great war the nationalist Irish responded to their experience of it by public finances. GNP will contract by 1% voting to have done with the Empire that launched it. In the mostly keenly contested next year. The budget itself and the manner election held in Ireland for a generation, in December 1918, the electorate brushed aside in which the political reaction was dealt the one party system established by John Redmond's movement by Tammany Hall with indicate that the Government is in a methods, and returned the Sinn Fein party.
    [Show full text]
  • OPW Awards in 2004 72
    Tuarascáil Bhliantúil Tuarascáil 2004 OPW Tuarascáil Bhliantúil 2004 2004 Report Annual OPW 2004 Annual Report Contents Foreword from Minister of State 2 Foreword from Chairman 3 Strategic Review 2004 6 Customer Charter 14 Operations Review 2004 18 Property Management Services 19 Facilities Management 24 Project Management Services 29 Architectural Services 38 Engineering Services 42 Government Supplies Agency 48 Heritage Services 52 Corporate Services 58 IT Unit 59 Training Unit 61 Accounts Branch 61 Management Accounting Service 62 Internal Audit 62 Art Management Group 62 Financial Review 2004 64 Funding of Programmes 67 Architectural Services 68 Barretstown Castle Trust 69 OPW Awards in 2004 72 Events in the Atrium 2004 74 Staff and Senior Personnel 76 OPW Offices throughout the country 79 High Cross, Durrow Abbey Main Guard Clonmel Rock of Cashel Foreword from Minister of State 2004 was another busy and successful year for the Office of Public Works. The year began with Ireland again holding the Presidency of the EU from January to June. This represented an enormous undertaking for the OPW given the amount of State visits, meetings and conferences involved. I am happy to say that OPW performed with distinction throughout this period and particular credit must go to our Facilities Management staff for rising to the challenges. The decentralisation process announced by Minister Charlie McCreevy in 2003 is well underway with the selection of sites ongoing. Agreement was reached on the purchase of many properties throughout 2004 and Property Management Services continue to make substantial progress in delivering this programme within the agreed timeframe. Project Management Services also became involved in rolling out the programme in 2004 as the construction of new offices began to become a reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008
    Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 Markus Schmidgen democracy international is a network promoting direct democracy. Our basic goal is the establishment of direct democracy (initiative and referendum) as a complement to representative democracy within the European Union and in the nation states. We also work on the general democratisation of the European Union, democratic reform and more direct and participatory democracy worldwide. http://www.democracy-international.org Written by Markus Schmidgen Layout: Ronald Pabst Proof-reading (contents):, Gayle Kinkead, Ronald Pabst, Thomas Rupp Proof-reading (language): Sheena A. Finley, Warren P. Mayr Advice: Dr. Klaus Hofmann, Bruno Kaufmann, Frank Rehmet Please refer all questions to: [email protected] Published by democracy international V 0.9 (4.9.2008) Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 I Introduction This report examines the process of the Irish CONTENT referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon. The referendum was held on June 12, 2008 and was the only referendum on this treaty. The evaluation is I INTRODUCTION .......................................... 3 based on the criteria set by the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe (IRIE). These criteria are internationally recognized as standards to II SETTING...................................................... 4 measure how free and fair a referendum process is conducted. This enables the reader to compare the II.1 Background ................................................... 4 Irish Lisbon referendum to other referendums and to identify the points that could be improved as well II.2 Actors ............................................................. 4 as those that are an example to other nations. II.3 Evaluation...................................................... 7 We at Democracy International and our European partners have already published a series of reports on the EU constitutional referenda of 2005: Juan III CONCLUSION.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Andy Higgins, BA
    Andy Higgins, B.A. (Hons), M.A. (Hons) Music, Politics and Liquid Modernity How Rock-Stars became politicians and why Politicians became Rock-Stars Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. in Politics and International Relations The Department of Politics, Philosophy and Religion University of Lancaster September 2010 Declaration I certify that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in substantially the same form for the award of a higher degree elsewhere 1 ProQuest Number: 11003507 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11003507 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Abstract As popular music eclipsed Hollywood as the most powerful mode of seduction of Western youth, rock-stars erupted through the counter-culture as potent political figures. Following its sensational arrival, the politics of popular musical culture has however moved from the shared experience of protest movements and picket lines and to an individualised and celebrified consumerist experience. As a consequence what emerged, as a controversial and subversive phenomenon, has been de-fanged and transformed into a mechanism of establishment support.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT of the Joint Committee of Inquiry Into the Banking Crisis Houses of the Oireachtas (Inquiries, Privileges and Procedures) Act, 2013
    TUARASCÁIL ón gComhchoiste Fiosrúcháin i dtaobh na Géarchéime Baincéireachta An tAcht um Thithe an Oireachtais (Fiosrúcháin, Pribhléidí agus Nósanna Imeachta), 2013 REPORT of the Joint Committee of Inquiry into the Banking Crisis Houses of the Oireachtas (Inquiries, Privileges and Procedures) Act, 2013 Volume 1: Report Volume 2: Inquiry Framework Volume 3: Evidence January 2016 Finalised by the Joint Committee of Inquiry into the Banking Crisis on the 26 January 2016 and sent by the Chairman, on behalf of the Joint Committee, to the Clerks of both Houses of the Oireachtas, for circulation to the members of Dáil Éireann and Seanad Éireann in accordance with Standing Orders 107G and 103L of Dáil Éireann and Seanad Éireann respectively, to enable the tabling of motions in both Houses to order the publication of this Report pursuant to section 40(1) (a) of the Houses of the Oireachtas (Inquiries, Privileges and Procedures) Act, 2013. Table of Contents Introduction by the Chairman of the Joint Committee of Inquiry into the Banking Crisis 3 Findings and Recommendations 7 1. The Banks 19 2. The Role of External Auditors 69 3. The Property Sector 85 4. State Institutions 99 5. Government Policy and the Oireachtas 161 6. Preparation for the Crisis: July 2007 – 29 September 2008 197 7. The Guarantee 243 8. Post-Guarantee Developments 279 9. Establishment, Operation and Effectiveness of NAMA 311 10. Ireland and the Troika Programme 329 11. Burden Sharing 357 Appendix List 1. Inquiry Framework Overview 375 2. Members of the Joint Committee 377 3. Orders of Reference of the Joint Committee 379 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for a Left Praxis in Northern Ireland
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Spring 2011 Sandino Socialists, Flagwaving Comrades, Red Rabblerousers: The trS uggle for a Left rP axis in Northern Ireland Benny Witkovsky SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Witkovsky, Benny, "Sandino Socialists, Flagwaving Comrades, Red Rabblerousers: The trS uggle for a Left rP axis in Northern Ireland" (2011). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 1095. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/1095 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Witkovsky 1 SANDINO SOCIALISTS, FLAG­WAVING COMRADES, RED RABBLE­ROUSERS: THE STRUGGLE FOR A LEFT PRAXIS IN NORTHERN IRELAND By Benny Witkovsky SIT: Transformation of Social and Political Conflict Academic Director: Aeveen Kerrisk Project Advisor: Bill Rolston, University of Ulster School of Sociology and Applied Social Studies, Transitional Justice Institute Spring 2011 Witkovsky 2 ABSTRACT This paper is the outcome of three weeks of research on Left politics in Northern Ireland. Taking the 2011 Assembly Elections as my focal point, I conducted a number of interviews with candidates and supporters, attended meetings and rallies, and participated in neighborhood canvasses.
    [Show full text]
  • JCER Special Commentary Series
    472 JCER JCER Special Commentary Series The 2009 Irish Referendum on the Lisbon Treaty Ben Tonra University College Dublin The Context and Issues The result of the 2008 Irish referendum on the Lisbon Treaty came as a considerable shock to the Irish body politic. The Irish electorate had, yet again, broken with the established political consensus on Europe. The vote on 13 June 2008 was based on a strong turnout (at over 53 percent) and a comparatively decisive result (53. 4 percent ‘no’ as against 46.6 percent ‘yes’). However, as the only EU member state ratifying the treaty by way of referendum, the electorate’s decision placed the Government in an immediate quandary. In the first instance, it was abundantly clear that there was no willingness among Ireland’s EU partners either to reopen negotiations or to abandon the treaty altogether. The issues to be addressed, the proposed solutions and the balance of interests and arguments among the member states was the same as it had been when the Lisbon Treaty was signed on 13 December 2007. Second, the ratification process was already well advanced with over a dozen member states already having ratified the treaty. Finally, it was not clear precisely on what the Irish electorate’s verdict had been based. The Government’s reaction to the defeat first centred on identifying the issues which had led to the ‘no’ vote. As part of this analysis, the Government commissioned Milward Brown IMS to conduct a detailed quantitative and qualitative survey with preliminary results published in September (Millward Brown IMS 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Persistent Occupation Careful
    Volume 20 / Issue 5 ucd.ie/tribune 14th November 2006 Careful Persistent Now Occupation Graham Linehan Interview Page 12 Will Tibet ever be free? Feature: Page 14 THIS WEEK Second years up the creek WITH ● Second Year exams to count for fifty percent of degrees MUSIC FILM ● Students' Union in talks with College HEALTH College authorities have informed FASHION second year students that exams Mark Canavan Oh what a night... CULTURE this year will count for fifty percent Bachelor of Arts, Bachelor of So- of their degrees. cial Science, Bachelor of Computer ARTS The decision and late notification Science and Bachelor of Music pro- of the decision has sparked outrage grammes. among students. Doyle stated, “Its not the educa- The College Tribune can reveal tional argument that I have a problem that Students’ Union Education Of- with here, but the late notification ficer Brian Doyle is currently in talks given to students is totally unaccept- with the college, in the hope that the able.” college will back down on the pro- He continued, “A lot of students posals and allow students the choice presumed that their degree would be to discount this current semester if weighted on their final year results.” they so wish. He added, “The presence of dual Doyle has expressed his grievances systems of old and new in these fac- over what he perceives as inexcusa- ulties makes students confused. Sec- bly late notification that second year ond years who talked to third years students have been given regarding could have easily taken for granted how the Grade Point Average (GPA) that the situation for their degree of their degree will be calculated.
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    Vol. 703 Tuesday, No. 4 2 March 2010 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Tuesday, 2 March 2010. Ceisteanna—Questions Taoiseach ………………………………… 673 Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources Priority Questions …………………………… 685 Other Questions …………………………… 695 Adjournment Debate Matters …………………………… 700 Leaders’ Questions ……………………………… 700 Death of Former Member: Expressions of Sympathy ………………… 707 Requests to move Adjournment of Dáil under Standing Order 32 ……………… 712 Order of Business ……………………………… 712 Planning and Development (Amendment) Bill 2009 [Seanad] Second Stage (resumed) ……… 718 Private Members’ Business Civil Liability (Good Samaritans and Volunteers) Bill 2009: Second Stage ………… 736 Adjournment Debate Industrial Disputes …………………………… 756 Water and Sewerage Schemes ………………………… 758 Flood Relief ……………………………… 760 Schools Building Projects …………………………… 762 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 765 DÁIL ÉIREANN ———— Dé Máirt, 2 Márta 2010. Tuesday, 2 March 2010. ———— Chuaigh an Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 2.30 p.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Ceisteanna — Questions. ———— Appointments to State Boards. 1. Deputy Enda Kenny asked the Taoiseach the appointments made by him since June 2002 to State boards or other agencies within his aegis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48401/09] 2. Deputy Enda Kenny asked the Taoiseach the names, occupations and dates of appoint- ment of those appointed to the boards of State agencies and bodies under the aegis of his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48406/09] 3. Deputy Eamon Gilmore asked the Taoiseach the appointments made by him to boards or agencies operating under the aegis of his Department since June 2002 to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
    [Show full text]
  • How Ireland Voted 2007 This Page Intentionally Left Blank How Ireland Voted 2007: the Full Story of Ireland’S General Election
    How Ireland Voted 2007 This page intentionally left blank How Ireland Voted 2007: The Full Story of Ireland’s General Election Edited by Michael Gallagher Michael Marsh palgrave macmillan Editorial Matter and Selection © Michael Gallagher and Michael Marsh 2008 Chapters 1–13 and Appendices © Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2008 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2008 978-0-230-50038-9 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their right to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2008 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St Martin’s Press LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN 978-0-230-20198-9 paperback ISBN 978-0-230-20198-9 ISBN 978-0-230-59799-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780230597990 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources.
    [Show full text]