Estimating Maintenance Costs for Royal Canadian Navy Ships a Parametric Cost Model

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Estimating Maintenance Costs for Royal Canadian Navy Ships a Parametric Cost Model Estimating Maintenance Costs for Royal Canadian Navy Ships A Parametric Cost Model Zakia Bouayed Christopher E. Penney Abderrahmane Sokri Tania Yazbeck DRDC – Centre for Operational Research and Analysis Defence Research and Development Canada Scientific Report DRDC-RDDC-2017-R147 October 2017 IMPORTANT INFORMATIVE STATEMENTS Disclaimer: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Department of National Defence) makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, of any kind whatsoever, and assumes no liability for the accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or usefulness of any information, product, process or material included in this document. Nothing in this document should be interpreted as an endorsement for the specific use of any tool, technique or process examined in it. Any reliance on, or use of, any information, product, process or material included in this document is at the sole risk of the person so using it or relying on it. Canada does not assume any liability in respect of any damages or losses arising out of or in connection with the use of, or reliance on, any information, product, process or material included in this document. This document was reviewed for Controlled Goods by Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) using the Schedule to the Defence Production Act. Endorsement statement: This publication has been peer-reviewed and published by the Editorial Office of Defence Research and Development Canada, an agency of the Department of National Defence of Canada. Inquiries can be sent to: [email protected]. Template in use: (2010) SR Advanced Template_EN (051115).dotm © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Department of National Defence), 2017 © Sa Majesté la Reine en droit du Canada (Ministère de la Défence nationale), 2017 Abstract This paper proposes a parametric costing model for Defence planners to conduct a first order estimate of the maintenance component of O&S costs for ships being considered for procurement. The model is built based on a parametric approach which incorporates relevant cost drivers as input parameters. The coefficients of these cost factors are estimated by fitting the model with a historical dataset of Royal Canadian Navy ships through regression analysis. Once the coefficient values are obtained, the cost model is used to produce out-of-sample fitted values to estimate maintenance costs for both currently active vessels and those being considered for acquisition. The regression analysis returns highly significant explanatory variables, with an R-squared statistic of 0.875. The single most important factor in explaining yearly maintenance costs is the ship’s class. Additionally, the effect of an additional sea day per year is to increase yearly maintenance costs by 0.38%. An Excel-based costing tool is also provided in this paper for potential use by personnel working within the Centre for Costing in Defence to produce rough order of magnitude maintenance cost estimates. Significance to Defence and Security This Scientific Report presents a regression-based parametric costing model to forecast the maintenance component of O&S costs for defence projects being considered for procurement. The outcome of this report supports the fourth Defence Priority – Ensuring Defence Resource Stewardship & Affordability. Estimating O&S costs while still in the early stages of a program is important for long-term budgeting and decision making and ensures that systems can be sustained over full program lifetimes, in addition to contributing to sound financial management of the Defence budget and stewardship of public resources. DRDC-RDDC-2017-R147 i Résumé Le présent document propose un modèle paramétrique d’estimation du coût à l’intention des planificateurs de la Défense afin d’obtenir une évaluation de premier ordre des coûts d’O & M dans le cadre du volet sur l’entretien des navires que l’on songe à acquérir. Le modèle a été élaboré selon une méthode paramétrique qui utilise des facteurs de coût pertinents comme paramètres d’entrée. On détermine les coefficients de ces facteurs de coût en ajustant le modèle en fonction d’un ensemble de données historiques sur les navires de la Marine royale canadienne au moyen d’une analyse de régression. Lorsqu’on connaît la valeur du coefficient, on utilise le modèle de coûts pour obtenir des valeurs ajustées hors échantillon afin de calculer les dépenses d’entretien, tant pour les navires en service que pour ceux que l’on songe à acquérir. L’analyse de régression donne des variables explicatives très importantes, notamment la valeur statistique R au carré de 0,875. Le plus important facteur permettant d’expliquer les frais annuels d’entretien est la classe du navire. En outre, chaque jour de mer supplémentaire par année fera augmenter les frais annuels d’entretien de 0,38%. Un outil d’estimation du coût en format Excel accompagne également le présent document afin que le personnel qui travaille au Centre d’établissement des coûts de la Défense puisse l’utiliser pour obtenir le montant approximatif des dépenses d’entretien. Importance pour la défense et la sécurité Le présent rapport scientifique propose un modèle paramétrique d’estimation du coût fondé sur une régression pour prévoir les dépenses d’O & M dans le cadre du volet sur l’entretien pour les projets de défense que l’on songe à acquérir. Le rapport vient appuyer la quatrième priorité de la Défense, soit assurer l’intendance des ressources et la viabilité financière de la Défense. L’estimation des dépenses d’O & M au tout début d’un programme est importante afin d’établir un budget et de prendre des décisions à long terme pour garantir que les systèmes pourront être maintenus tout au long de la durée de vie du programme et contribuer à une saine gestion financière du budget de la Défense ainsi qu’à l’intendance des ressources publiques. ii DRDC-RDDC-2017-R147 Table of Contents Abstract ................................. i Significance to Defence and Security ...................... i Résumé ................................ ii Importance pour la défense et la sécurité .................... ii Table of Contents ............................ iii List of Figures ............................. v List of Tables .............................. v Acknowledgements ........................... vi 1 Introduction ............................. 1 1.1 Background and Context ...................... 1 1.2 Literature Review ........................ 2 1.3 Aim ............................. 3 1.4 Scope ............................. 3 1.5 Report Structure ......................... 3 2 Model ............................... 4 2.1 Cost Elements .......................... 4 2.1.1 Operating Costs ...................... 4 2.1.2 Maintenance Costs ..................... 4 2.1.3 Sustaining Support Costs ................... 4 2.2 Parametric Approach ....................... 5 2.3 Random Effects Model ...................... 6 2.4 Dependent Variable ........................ 6 2.5 Identifying Cost Drivers ...................... 6 2.6 Developing Cost Estimating Relationships ............... 7 2.7 Model Limitations ........................ 8 3 Regression Results .......................... 9 3.1 Dataset ............................ 9 3.2 Parameter Estimates ....................... 9 3.3 Model Diagnostics ........................ 10 3.4 Discussion ........................... 11 4 Navy Maintenance Costing Tool ..................... 12 4.1 Obtaining an Estimate ....................... 12 4.2 Example ............................ 13 5 Conclusion ............................. 14 5.1 Recommendations ........................ 14 6 Attachment ............................. 16 References ............................... 17 DRDC-RDDC-2017-R147 iii Annex A Data ............................. 18 Annex B Interpreting the Regression Results .................. 22 Annex C Potential Applications ...................... 23 C.1 Aircraft and Land Vehicles ..................... 23 C.2 Facilities ............................ 23 C.3 Classification .......................... 23 List of Symbols/Abbreviations/Acronyms/Initialisms ............... 25 iv DRDC-RDDC-2017-R147 List of Figures Figure 1: Profile of annual program expenditures by major cost category across life cycles. ............................. 1 Figure 2: RCN Ship Maintenance Costing Tool, Halifax Class Ship with 100 Sea Days. 13 Figure 3: RCN Ship Maintenance Costing Tool, Kingston Class Ship with 220 Sea Days. .............................. 13 Figure C.1: Classification of defence equipment. ................. 24 List of Tables Table 1: Description of O&S cost categories. ................. 5 Table 2: Regression results. ........................ 9 Table 3: Selected regression diagnostics. ................... 10 Table A.1: RCN Dataset, 2011–2015 Fiscal Years. ................ 18 DRDC-RDDC-2017-R147 v Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of LCdr Guy Cadrin for making this study possible. His assistance in obtaining data and providing an understanding of Navy maintenance procedures contributed significantly to the successful execution of this study. vi DRDC-RDDC-2017-R147 1 Introduction 1.1 Background and Context The Centre for Costing in Defence (CCD) makes use of the concept of the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) to bring total cost visibility to a purchasing program. LCC can be thought of as a “cradle to grave” approach to managing a program throughout its useful life. This entails identifying all cost elements that pertain to the program
Recommended publications
  • Hmcs Ottawa Ncsm Ottawa
    A-AD-267-000/AF-002 HMCS OTTAWA NCSM OTTAWA BADGE INSIGNE Description Description Gules a bend wavy Argent charged with two cotises De gueules, une bande ondée d'argent barrée de deux wavy Azure over all a beaver Or the sinister forepaw cotices ondées d'azur, brochant le tout un castor d'or, resting on a log of silver birch proper. la patte en senestre reposant sur une bûche de bouleau argenté au naturel. Significance Signification The design is derived from the unofficial pre-war and Ces armoiries sont dérivées de l'insigne non officielles war-time badge of Ottawa, a beaver on a log of wood. portées par le Ottawa avant et pendant la guerre : un The white and blue wavy bend represents the Ottawa castor sur une bûche. La bande ondée blanche et bleue River after which the ship is named. The red field is représente la rivière des Outaouais d'ou origine le nom intended to refer to those Outaouais or Ottawans who du navire. Le champ rouge se rapporte aux travelled this river and from whom the name was Amérindiens (Peaux-rouges), les Outaouais ou Ottawas derived. qui, empruntant le cours d'eau pour la navigation, ont baptisé la rivière. MOTTO DEVISE EGOR BEOFOR (Ocean beaver) EGOR BEOFOR (Castor de l'océan) 2-73 A-AD-267-000/AF-002 COLOURS COULEURS Red and White Rouge et blanc Note Nota Normal heraldic colours, the principal colours in the badge, would be Les couleurs héraldiques normales, les principales couleurs de gold and red, but the official Colours of Canada, white and red, are l'insigne, devraient être l'or et le rouge; mais les couleurs officielles used instead because the capital of Canada lies on the Ottawa River.
    [Show full text]
  • CMS 330 Brochure
    Combat Management System 330 (CMS 330) CMS 330 was developed as a result of 30+ years’ experience and knowledge of Canadian and NATO naval operations. In 2008, Lockheed Martin Canada was selected to design this system as part of Canada’s HALIFAX Class Modernization project. CMS 330 provides the Royal Canadian Navy with the operational ability to carry out multi-mission operations while defending its ships in an ever-evolving, threat environment. The system was also designed as a modern, affordable solution for mid-life upgrades in the international market. A Trusted Solution for Demanding and Complex Surface Ship Missions Open Architecture and ITAR-Free A Fielded and Trusted Solution An affordable and flexible solution CMS 330 is not only proving itself on Canada’s HALIFAX Class with low life-cycle costs, CMS 330 is an Frigates, but it is also the backbone of the technical solution for open-architecture based system which the Royal New Zealand Navy’s ANZAC Frigate System Upgrade, adapts to a variety of subsystems, as well as the command and surveillance management system reducing risk and ensuring delivery for Canada’s new Arctic O-Shore Patrol Ships (AOPS). of unique customer requirements. Benefitting from an active production line, future customers An ITAR-free CMS design allows the will have a ready, continually maturing solution with access international customer to manage and to existing engineering designs and full requirements exploit its full range of capabilities and analysis. This keeps non-recurring engineering costs at an advantages without restriction. absolute minimum. Ease of Implementation, Integration and Maintainability CMS 330 is designed as a Service Oriented Architecture CMS 330 can be scaled for platforms with different system (SOA) based on the Data Distribution System (DDS) limits, operator consoles, and subsystems without major standard, making subsystem weapons and sensor rework to the entire system.
    [Show full text]
  • Poseidon Cutlass
    WWantant ttoo kknownow wwhathat yyourour BBasease Volume 62 Number 30 | July 31, 2017 Helping BC families become debt free CCommanderommander for more than 35 years. iiss uupp tto?o? WANT TO BECOME debt free? DDoo yyouou uusese newspaper.comnewwssppaaperr..com Talk to us today to see if a Consumer Proposal is right for you. FFacebook?acebook? TTwitter?witter? MARPAC NEWS CCFBFB EEsquimalt,squimalt, VVictoria,ictoria, BB.C..C Stop collection calls 778-403-4335 Follow Captain (N) Jason Boyd Stop a wage garnishment FREE CONSULTATION @LookoutNewspaperNavyNews @Lookout_news Deal with income tax debts smytheinsolvency.com on Twitter: @MayorCFBEsq And visit facebook.com/EsquimaltBase Smythe Insolvency Inc. Licensed Insolvency Trustees POSEIDON CUTLASS The crew of HMCS Winnipeg, currently on Poseidon Cutlass 17, lowers a rigid hulled inflatable boat containing Leading Seaman Anthony Berardi and Ordinary Seaman Mitchel Kathol as part of boat crew training. Photo by MCpl Carbe Orellana, MARPAC Imaging Services The goal is to Join in the 2017 Invictus We proudly serve the have a signed fl ag for each Games celebration! Canadian Forces Community competitor participating Write a message of As a military family we understand in the 2017 encouragement your cleaning needs during ongoing Invictus Games on the Supporter Flag service, deployment and relocation. www.mollymaid.ca taking place this September Monday July 31 to August 16 in Toronto. Naden Athletic Centre (250) 744-3427 [email protected] 2 • LOOKOUT July 31, 2017 Red Serge returns to HMCS Regina James Vassallo “The idea that a piece of my father will be Mess but that it had been lost while the ship Base Public Affairs immortalized with this ship for as long as she was in mid-life refit,” says LCdr Graham.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Engineering Journal 64 Since 1982 CANADA’S NAVAL TECHNICAL FORUM Spring 2009
    Maritime Engineering Journal 64 Since 1982 CANADA’S NAVAL TECHNICAL FORUM Spring 2009 The Nine Minute Writing Challenge (Part II) The Challenge Moves East CNTHA News Inside! Also in this Issue: • First Frigate Rollout of the MASIS “Deployed Solution” • Forum: The Requirement for Requirements • A Measure of Seaworthiness West Coast “whale” watching — Photo: Brian McCullough HMCS Orca (PCT-55) may look like a killer backyard building project in this October 2008 photo, but the patrol training vessel was simply in for repairs at the Point Hope Maritime Limited shipyard in Victoria’s Upper Harbour. Maritime Engineering (Established 1982) Edition No. 64 Journal SPRING 2009 DEPARTMENTS Commodore’s Corner Engineering Knowledge — Understanding the requirement is fundamental in the search for solutions by Commodore Richard Greenwood .............................................................. 2 Letters An Engineer’s Tale — Diving in the Engine Room by Commodore (Ret.) Ed Murray .................................................................. 3 Forum The Requirement for Requirements (or how to get what you want) Director General by LCdr (ret.) Gordon Forbes ........................................................................ 4 Maritime Equipment Program Management Commodore Richard W. Greenwood, OMM, CD FEATURES The East Coast’s “Short Answer” to the Nine Minute Writing Challenge Senior Editor We asked participants at the 2008 MARLANT Naval Technical Capt(N) Mike Wood DGMEPM Chief of Staff Seminar to write about their biggest technical challenge in the navy. You should read what they wrote. Project Director by 71 Worthy Contributors ............................................................................. 7 Maritime Engineering Journal Lt(N) Patrick Fortin Materiel Acquisition and Support Information System — First Frigate Rollout of the MASIS “Deployed Solution” Production Editor / Enquiries Brian McCullough by LCdr Simon Paré, CP02 Chris Tucker and Janelle Mansfield ..............
    [Show full text]
  • The National Fleet Plan
    THE NATIONAL FLEET PLAN DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS UNITED STATES COAST GUARD OFFICE OF THE COMMANDANT August 2015 This Page Left Intentionally Blank This Page Left Intentionally Blank This Page Left Intentionally Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1. Preamble…..……………………………………………………………………………… 9 2. Purpose……………………………………………………………………………………. 9 3. National Fleet Plan Overview…………...……………………………………………….. 9 4. Plan Progression and Oversight………………………………………………………… 10 5. National Fleet Plan……………………………………………………………………… 10 5.1. Current and Evolving Operations ……………………………………...….................. 10 5.2. Integrated Logistics………………………………………….……………………….. 12 5.3. Training……………………………………………………………..………………… 15 5.4. Maritime Security Cooperation…………………….…………………….…………… 21 5.5. Command, Control, Communications (C3) Systems…………………….…………… 22 5.6. Sensors………………………………………………………………………………... 25 5.7. Weapon Systems…………………………………………………….………………... 26 5.8. Engineering Systems…………………………………………………...……………... 28 5.9. Platforms………………………………………………………………….…………… 29 5.10. Intelligence and Information Integration………………………………….................. 34 6. Programmatic Collaboration…………………………………………………………… 36 7. Integrated Plan of Action and Milestones…………………………………..………….. 36 8. Navy-Coast Guard Memoranda of Understanding/Memoranda of Agreement………... 44 9. Legal Authorities…………………………………………………………….................. 48 Chartered Commonality Working Groups: Mission/Plan of Action and Milestones Appendix A. Permanent Joint Working Group…………………………………… 50
    [Show full text]
  • HMCS Algonquin Prior to Her Doing Her Single Missile Shot at Barking Sands Range Off Hawaii
    Issue 9/ Numéro 9 NESOP Newsletter / Bulletin de l’OP(DEM) June/Juin 2001 The NESOP Le BULLETIN OP NEWSLETTER is (DEN) est publié par published by and les OP DEN de la for the NESOPs And The Survey Says…… Marine canadienne of the Canadian et à leur intention. Navy. It’s Ok, so the title was Our good SME has provided a Son but : aider les purpose; to keep “borrowed” from a game column that will help to sort out militaires à connaître members current show. Given the scope of the burning questions for us all. l’actualité en ce qui with items that what’s happened with the One thing is certain. If we set concerne le milieu reflect the MOC over the past six out to identify our MOC des OP DEN, en NESOP months, it’s rather fitting. deficiencies, we succeeded. If complétant community, by Coinciding with the release of we set out to document those l’information qui supplementing issue eight in Nov 00, the deficiencies, so the same types provient des sources information Combat Ops questionnaire of problems can be averted in officielles, et offrir provided by une tribune où les formal sources was making it’s rounds from the future, we succeeded. If we sea to shining sea. You know. set out to ensure that our unités peuvent and acting as a mettre en commun forum for sharing That survey that wanted to difficulties were made known know what you think you did. to the “powers that be”, we les sujets dignes unit-level items d’intérêt.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 ' F ' FAFARD, Charles Omar, Signalman (V-4147)
    ' F ' FAFARD, Charles Omar, Signalman (V-4147) - Mention in Despatches - RCNVR / HMCS Columbia - Awarded as per Canada Gazette of 29 May 1943 and London Gazette of 5 October 1943. Home: Montreal, Quebec HMCS Columbia was a Town Class Destroyer (I49) (ex-USS Haraden) FAFARD. Charles Omar, V-4147, Sigmn, RCNVR, MID~[29.5.43] "This rating showed devotion to duty and was alert, cheerful and resourceful when performing duties in connection with the salvaging of S.S. Matthew Luckenbach. "For good services in connection with the salvage of S.S. Matthew Luckenbach while serving in HMCS Columbia (London Gazette)." * * * * * * 1 FAHRNI, Gordon Paton, Surgeon Lieutenant - Distinguished Service Cross (DSC) - RCNVR / HMS Fitzroy - Awarded as per London Gazette of 30 July 1942 (no Canada Gazette). Home: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Medical Graduate of the University of Manitoba in 1940. He earned his Fellowship (FRCS) in Surgery after the war and was a general surgeon at the Winnipeg General and the Winnipeg Children’s Hospitals. FAHRNI. Gordon Paton, 0-22780, Surg/LCdr(Temp) [7.10.39] RCNVR DSC~[30.7.42] Surg/LCdr [14.1.47] RCN(R) HMCS CHIPPAWA Winnipeg Naval Division, (25.5.48-?) Surg/Cdr [1.1.51] "For great bravery and devotion to duty. For great gallantry, daring and skill in the attack on the German Naval Base at St. Nazaire." HMS Fitzroy (J03 - Hunt Class Minesweeper) was sunk on 27 May 1942 by a mine 40 miles north-east of Great Yarmouth in position 52.39N, 2.46E. It was most likely sunk by a British mine! It had been commissioned on 01 July 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • HCM/FELEX Backgrounder • Behind-The-Scenes: Project Perspectives and Lessons Learned • Valuable Industry Insights New Sea Legs for Canada's Navy Frigates
    National Défense Defence nationale Maritime Engineering 82 Journal Since 1982 March 2017 Canada’s Naval Technical Forum SPECIAL EDITION Halifax-Class Modernization / Frigate Life Extension Project In this Issue: • HCM/FELEX Backgrounder • Behind-the-scenes: Project Perspectives and Lessons Learned • Valuable Industry Insights New Sea Legs for Canada's Navy Frigates HMCS Montréal (FFH-336) in mid-life refit at Irving Shipbuilding's Halifax Shipyard MARITIME ENGINEERING JOURNAL NO. 82 (MARCH 2017) SPECIAL EDITION – HCM/FELEX Maritime Engineering 82 (Established 1982) Journal March 2017 Commodore’s Corner Teamwork, Trust and Respect Redefined ................................................................................................ 2 Project Perspectives Director General A First for the Maritime Engineering Journal .................................................................................3 Maritime Equipment Program #Teamwork .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Management HCM/FELEX: An important Chapter in Canada's Naval Technical History .........................4 Commodore Simon Page, Technology and Teamwork – Keys to Sucess .................................................................................5 OMM, CD Backgrounder – HCM/FELEX .........................................................................................................6 HCM: A Successful Program .............................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Readiness of Canada's Naval Forces Report of the Standing
    The Readiness of Canada's Naval Forces Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence Stephen Fuhr Chair June 2017 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Navy
    1 | P a g e Royal Canadian Sea Cadet Corps Centurion Canadian Navy 2 | P a g e The Canadian Navy “The Sea Element of the Canadian Forces” The current resources of the Canadian Navy include: twelve Halifax class Canadian Patrol Frigates (CPFs) (multipurpose); three Iroquois class Destroyers (DDGs) (air defence and antisubmarine); two Protecteur class Auxiliary Oil Replenishers (AORs) (replenishment); twelve Kingston class Maritime Coastal Defence Vessels (MCDVs) (coastal surveillance and mine counter measures); four Victoria class submarines; aircraft – CH-124 Sea King helicopters and CP-140 Aurora long-range patrol planes (though they are operated by Air Force personnel, they act in support of naval operations); and miscellaneous auxiliary vessels (firefighting vessels, tugboats, diving tenders, etc.). The Canadian Navy also makes use of 24 Naval Reserve Divisions across Canada. The Halifax class Canadian Patrol Frigates include: Her Majesty’s Canadian Ship (HMCS) Halifax 330 HMCS Vancouver 331 HMCS Ville De Québec 332 HMCS Toronto 333 HMCS Regina 334 HMCS Calgary 335 HMCS Ottawa341 HMCS Montréal 336 HMCS Fredericton 337 HMCS Winnipeg 338 HMCS Charlottetown 339 HMCS St. John’s 340 HMCS Ottawa 341 The Iroquois class Destroyers include: HMCS Iroquois 280 HMCS Iroquios 280 HMCS Athabaskan 282 HMCS Algonquin 283 The Protecteur class includes: HMCS Preserver 510 HMCS Protecteur 509 HMCS Preserver 510 The Kingston class Coastal Defence Vessels include: HMCS Kingston 700 HMCS Glace Bay 701 HMCS Nanaimo 702 HMCS Edmonton 703 HMCS Shawinigan 704 HMCS Whitehorse 705 HMCS Brandon 710 HMCS Yellowknife 706 HMCS Goose Bay 707 HMCS Moncton 708 HMCS Saskatoon 709 HMCS Brandon 710 HMCS Summerside 711 3 | P a g e The Victoria class submarines include: HMCS Victoria 876 HMCS Windsor 877 HMCS Corner Brook 878 HMCS Chicoutimi 879 HMCS Victoria 876 Sea King Helicopter Aurora Visit the Canadian Navy Website at www.navy.gc.ca for the most up to date information on the fleet and its supporting aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lockheed-Martin Multi-Function Workstation
    PATRON H.R.H. THE PRINCE PHILIP DUKE OF EDINBURGH OTTAWA BRANCH THE NAVAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Box 505, Station B, Ottawa, ON K1P 5P6 “To make all levels of Government and the general public clearly aware of the vital need for, and value of adequate and effective Maritime security forces to protect and further the interests of Canada.” (Branch Constitution, Article III.) 45.02 “Trying the depth of the water and the quality of the bottom line.…” November 2009 The Lockheed-Martin Multi-Function Workstation See the cover story on the Halifax Class Modernization starting on page 5 Soundings November 2009 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ From the President By Bob Bush necessary to help share the load. In this edition… I am committed to the ongoing renewal of the NOAC, set in motion with P2. President’s Remarks the acceptance of the Fowler Report and being P.3 Editor’s Desk well-guided in its implementation with P.3 SLt Down Part 13 Richard Archer at the helm. P.5 Halifax Class This initiative is essential to the longevity of the NOAC. Modernization Dear Branch Members, Further, I can think of no P.8 SHINPADS better way to commence the As the new second 100 years of naval P.9 Entertainment News President, I have the service than to provide privilege to be involved in serving and retired officers P.10 CNAG an exciting time for the with a relevant and engaged NOAC. With the Navy’s social and professional P.11 NOAC Conference Centennial celebrations, association. In this light, I 2010 which kicked off in October value the relationship that this year and will extend we have built with the P.12 Branch Meeting into 2010, we of the naval Society of Naval Architects P.13 Naval Aviation RV community will have an and Marine Engineers excellent opportunity to (SNAME).
    [Show full text]
  • Mp-Hfm-275-22P
    Suicide and Violence Perpetration Risk Assessments in the Canadian Armed Forces Health Information System: A Population-Based Analysis Robert Hawes & François Thériault Directorate of Force Health Protection Department of National Defence, Ottawa, Canada NATO HFM-275 Riga, Latvia 05 April 2017 Suicide in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) • 3rd leading cause of death in active-duty personnel 1983 -2007 (17%) (Tien et al. 2010) • 23.5 deaths per 100,000 person-years (Rolland-Harris et al, 2016) • 4.3% of CAF service members seriously consider suicide (Mann et al, 2005; Rusu et al, 2016) • 9% of CAF personnel with suicidal ideation attempt suicide (Rusu et al, 2016) • 93% of CAF suicide deaths (83% civilian pop.) accessed health care in previous 12 months (Mann, 2005; Rolland-Harris et al, 2016) Alert CFHIS SQL Referral / Diagnostic / Review of Care Discharge Intake Treatment Diagnostic Assessment MH Referral Periodic Case Psychosocial Review * Functioning Discharge Summary * Intake Session Note * External Screening * Provider Psychiatrist Review Progress Note Family Counselling Communication Case Consult Couple and Individual Conference Note Family Session Communication Note CFHIS Mental Health Session Note Clinical Impression Classification (CIC) 7 Clinical Impression Classifications (CIC) Addictions / Compulsive Behaviours • Classification system to Administrative categorize the MH Childhood / Upbringing assessment or narrative Education Family Circumstance • Terms based on ICD-10 Housing / Economic health status (Z-codes) Legal / Disciplinary
    [Show full text]