DOCSLIB.ORG

Implementation of the National Broadband Plan: Issues, Opportunities and Challenges Jonathan S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Implementation of the National Broadband Plan: Issues, Opportunities and Challenges Jonathan S Implementation of the National Broadband Plan: Issues, Opportunities and Challenges Jonathan S. Marashlian Michael P. Donahue Speaker Bios • Jonathan Marashlian, partner at Helein & Marashlian, LLC, The CommLaw Group, assists clients with regulatory compliance and strategies, transactional, litigation & regulatory defense matters before the FCC and state regulatory agencies across the nation. He counsels clients in all aspects of state and federal regulatory matters, focusing on compliance with the Universal Service Fund and similar regulatory programs through his firm’s unique Compliance & Reporting Services. Jonathan earned his J.D. from the George Mason University School of Law. • Michael Donahue is a Senior Associate at Helein & Marashlian, The CommLaw Group. He has represented CLECs, ISPs, VoIP providers, DSL providers, and other domestic and international data and voice telecommunications providers and technology companies in all aspects of their businesses, including regulatory compliance, corporate and transactional matters, public policy advocacy and litigation. His recent experience as Senior Counsel for a Tier I broadband Internet provider with one of the largest IP transit networks in North America gives him an inside perspective on the issues facing broadband network and service providers. Michael earned his J.D., cum laude, from the Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law. Introduction: Purpose of this Series • Part 1 – Introduction, Background, Predictions (June 8, 2010) • Part 2 – Issues for Government – public safety, next generation E911, privacy/cybersecurity, etc. (Date TBD) • Part 3 – Competition Issues – Access to poles, conduits, and rights-of-way, USF contribution reform, etc. (Date TBD) Part 1: The National Broadband Plan: Issues, Proposals and Predictions Overview of the National Broadband Plan • Comprehensive plan aimed at improving broadband deployment • Aggressive regulatory reform • USF reform, intercarrier compensation reform • Opportunities for growth & investment Purpose of the Plan • What are the FCC’s goals? 1. Improved broadband deployment, access & adoption in un/under-served areas • Goal of 100 MBPs access to 100 million people by 2020 2. Promote world-leading mobile broadband infrastructure & innovation 3. Enhance broadband competition to promote innovation and benefits to consumers 4. Advance robust and secure public safety communications networks FCC Broadband Action Agenda & Implementation Timeline • Announces 60 proceedings & initiatives aimed at implementing the Plan • Plan released April 8, 2010 • At least 40 policy/rulemaking proceedings expected from Q2 – Q4 2010 – VoIP classification order possible in 2011, USF subsidy methodology possible • Begin implementing USF contribution changes and intercarrier compensation in 2011 Broadband Action Agenda & Implementation Timeline Cont’d • USF transition 2011-2016 • Complete intercarrier compensation transition 2012-2016 • Eliminate high-cost fund, complete transition to Connect America Fund & Mobility Fund, complete transition to $0.00 intercarrier compensation 2017-2020 • 100 Mbps to 100 million people in 2020 Specific Proposals: USF Overhaul, Background on the USF • Subsidy program created by Telecommunications Act of 1996 • Created to achieve “universal [telephone] service” • Not designed to support broadband deployment Why the USF Needs Reform • ILECs receive a disproportional amount of subsidy funds • Huge error rates in pay-outs • Exponential growth in contribution factor • Inability to close the digital divide USF Overhaul: The Big Picture • Shift support from voice services to broadband • To be achieved in three stages, with the goal of connecting 99% of Americans by 2020 • Two revenue-neutral funds to be created – Connect America Fund- to extend broadband to un/underserved areas – Mobility Fund- to promote 3G service USF Overhaul, Stage One Stage One (2010-2011) 1. Identify funding that can be shifted immediately to jumpstart broadband deployment 2. Create a framework for the Connect America and Mobility Funds 3. Establish a long-term vision for intercarrier compensation 4. Examine middle-mile costs and pricing Specific Proposals: USF Overhaul Cont’d; FCC Releases NOI/NPRM • On April 21, 2010, the FCC approved a NOI and NPRM proposing and seeking comment on ways to cut inefficiencies in the current USF system and transition to the Connect America Fund The Initial NOI • NOI seeks comment on use of economic model to tariff support areas where no private-sector business can provide broadband and voice services (eliminates the gap between cost of deploying broadband and the potential additional revenue generated from the broadband investment) The Initial NPRM – NPRM seeks comments on proposals to reduce legacy universal service spending and shift to support for broadband communications – Proposals include: 1. Capping the overall size of the high-cost program at 2010 levels 2. Reexamining current regulatory framework for smaller carriers 3. Phasing out support for multiple competitors in areas where the market cannot support even one provider – Comments due July 12 ; Reply comments due August 11 USF Overhaul, Stage Two • Begin disbursements from CAF and Mobility Fund • Reform contribution methodology – Numbers-based – Connections-based – Revenue-based USF Overhaul, Stage Three • Complete Transition of High-Cost Fund into CAF and Mobility Funds • End support for voice only networks • Finish intercarrier compensation reform Implementation Obstacles 1)FCC’s Authority to Regulate Broadband absent Congressional Action 2)Magnitude of the Plan 3)Technical Limitations 4)Funding Obstacles: Legal Authority to Regulate Broadband • Commission must have authority to regulate broadband generally, and to impose USF obligations on broadband service providers • To support USF, FCC requires contributions from broadband providers • Only “telecommunications” subject to USF • Must reclassify broadband as “telecommunications” Obstacles to Implementation – Authority to Regulate Broadband, Comcast v. FCC Comcast v. FCC DC Circuit found FCC did not have expressly delegated authority to regulate Comcast’s provision of Internet service and could not exercise its ancillary authority without tying the ancillary authority to an express statutory delegation of authority The Congressional statements of policy cited by the FCC are not statutory delegation of authority and, therefore, cannot support exercise of ancillary authority Commission faced with high hurdle on path to National Broadband Plan implementation The First Way – Stay the Course • Continue to treat broadband as an unregulated “information service” • Concede limited authority under Comcast • FCC must rely upon its ancillary authority to regulate broadband which will subject the Commission to jurisdictional challenges based upon the Comcast ruling • Continued treatment of broadband as an information service deprives the FCC of any real chance to implement its Plan (Unless the Commission can get USF contributions from broadband service providers, it can’t support broadband deployment because the Fund is dwindling) The Second Way – Heavy Regulation • Reclassify broadband Internet access as a telecommunications service subject to the full suite of provisions under Title II • Could regulate broadband like a traditional telecom service & assess USF fees on providers • Inconsistent with regulatory policy and new technologies The Second Way – Cont’d • Commission would have to find an alternate basis for regulating broadband • Would fall subject to jurisdictional challenges • Complete overhaul of existing regulatory regime • Not a realistic solution in light of the Comcast decision The Third Way • Would separately classify the transmission component of broadband Internet access services as “telecommunications,” when offered on a common carrier basis, subject to limited Title II regulation • The information component would be subject to a limited set of regulations pursuant to the FCC’s ancillary jurisdiction under Title I • Preserve common vs. private carrier distinction The Third Way Cont’d - Details (1) The Commission would recognize the transmission component of broadband Internet access services as a telecommunications service when provided on a common carrier basis (2) The Commission would apply only a handful of Title II provisions to the transmission component of broadband Internet access services, particularly Sections 201, 202, 208, 222, 254 and 255, requiring (a) USF contributions (254); (b) 201, 202 & 208- prevention of unreasonable denials of service & other unjust practices; (c) Section 222- protection of confidential subscriber information; and (d) 255- making equipment accessible to individuals with disabilities unless not reasonably achievable (3) The FCC would renounce the application of other “unnecessary” provisions of the Communications Act to broadband service providers; and (4) The Commission would erect “meaningful boundaries” to prevent regulatory overreaching The Third Way & Brand X NCTA v. Brand X – Supreme Court upheld an FCC order classifying cable modem Internet access service as an information service, exempt from Commission jurisdiction – Scalia dissent found Commission’s interpretation of the Communications Act to be unreasonable and unlawful – Third Way consistent with Scalia’s dissent in Brand X Implementation of the Third Way To implement the Third Way, the FCC must: (1) Adopt a notice of inquiry or notice of proposed rulemaking proposing to reverse its
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Affordability-Report-2020.Pdf
    A global coalition working to make broadband affordable for all AFFORDABILITY REPORT 2020 www.a4ai.org ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was written by and prepared under the direction of Teddy Woodhouse, with contributions from Ana María Rodríguez. It was edited by Lisa van Wyk. Additional comments and suggestions were provided by Carlos Iglesias, Sonia Jorge, Anju Mangal, and Eleanor Sarpong. The Affordability Drivers Index research and calculations were carried out by Siaka Lougue (African Institute for Mathematical Sciences) and Ana María Rodríguez, with support from Carlos Iglesias. A global team of 25 independent researchers assisted the Alliance in conducting the 72 comprehensive policy surveys that inform the report’s findings this year and provide the basis for the policy scores in the Affordability Drivers Index. We thank them for their contributions. The authors also wish to thank the interviewees from around the world and from various backgrounds who contributed their time and insights to help inform the analysis and recommendations of this report. Any errors remain the authors’ alone. Finally, we are grateful for the support of A4AI’s global sponsors — Sida and Google — and that of the Alliance’s entire membership. Suggested citation: Alliance for Affordable Internet (2020). The Affordability Report 2020. Web Foundation. This report is made available under a Creative Commons 4.0 International licence. For media or other inquiries: [email protected]. CONTENTS Welcome Letter from the Executive Director 4 Executive Summary
    [Show full text]
  • National Broadband Strategy 2018-2023
    The National Broadband Strategy 2018-2023 REPUBLIC OF KENYA NATIONAL BROADBAND STRATEGY 2018-2023 1 The National Broadband Strategy 2018-2023 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This strategy is a culmination of collaborative work that could not have been completed without the support of the government and the concerted efforts of the National Broadband Strategy (NBS) Steering Committee and stakeholders including Information and Communications Technology (ICT) infrastructure providers, service providers, the education sector, finance, complementary infrastructure sectors including Roads and Energy, special interest groups and the general public each of whom devoted their time, effort and expertise. It would not have been possible to develop the strategy without the invaluable input from the Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Information and Communication Technology (MoICT), Principal Secretaries in the Ministry, other Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs), senior officials, the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) and officials from other Government Ministries who took time to participate in extensive consultations that helped shape this Strategy. The Strategy echoes the country’s commitment to leverage on broadband as an enabler towards a globally competitive knowledge-based society and it is our hope that the same collaborative commitment and spirit that enriched the development of this Strategy will be carried forward for the successful implementation of the Strategy. 2 The National Broadband Strategy 2018-2023 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Broadband Plan Executive Summary
    A M E R I C A ’ S P LAN Ex ECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Broadband is the great infrastructure challenge of the early Broadband networks only create value to consumers and 21st century. businesses when they are used in conjunction with broadband- Like electricity a century ago, broadband is a foundation capable devices to deliver useful applications and content. To for economic growth, job creation, global competitiveness and fulfill Congress’s mandate, the plan seeks to ensure that the entire a better way of life. It is enabling entire new industries and broadband ecosystem—networks, devices, content and applica- unlocking vast new possibilities for existing ones. It is changing tions—is healthy. It makes recommendations to the FCC, the how we educate children, deliver health care, manage energy, Executive Branch, Congress and state and local governments. ensure public safety, engage government, and access, organize and disseminate knowledge. The Plan Fueled primarily by private sector investment and innova- Government can influence the broadband ecosystem in four ways: tion, the American broadband ecosystem has evolved rapidly. 1. Design policies to ensure robust competition and, as a The number of Americans who have broadband at home has result maximize consumer welfare, innovation and grown from eight million in 2000 to nearly 200 million last investment. year. Increasingly capable fixed and mobile networks allow 2. Ensure efficient allocation and management of assets Americans to access a growing number of valuable applications government controls or influences, such as spectrum, poles, through innovative devices. and rights-of-way, to encourage network upgrades and com- But broadband in America is not all it needs to be.
    [Show full text]
  • National Operational Broadband Plan
    NATIONAL OPERATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION SOCIETY AND ADMINISTRATION April 2019 1 DOCUMENT OBJECTIVE Republic of North Macedonia, being a candidate country for EU membership, is obliged to harmonise its national policies on electronic communications development with EU policies, in line with which an obligation was imposed to adopt a National Operational Broadband Plan (NOBP), which will be harmonised with the strategic objectives of the EU 2010 initiative on Digital Agenda for Europe1, as an umbrella strategy for information society development, and the EU 2016 strategy Towards a European Gigabit Society2 for 2025. Also, the development of the National Operational Broadband Plan took into consideration the EU recommendations and regulations on the development of the next generations of broadband networks, recommendations for using state aid in broadband development, EU 2018 strategy for enlargement with Western Balkan countries3, EU reports on the broadband market development, reports from international institutions on the electronic communications development in the region (World Bank etc.), reports and experiences of EU member states in using state aid for broadband development, etc. The National Operational Broadband Plan, succeeding the National Strategy for Development of the Next Generation of Broadband Internet, sets the national broadband4 targets that are to be achieved over the next period of time, and defines the measures and activities required for achieving those targets. DEVELOPMENT, REVISION OF THE NATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Broadband 2019 Broadband As a Foundation for Sustainable Development
    International The State of Broadband: Telecommunication Union Broadband as a Foundation Place des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland for Sustainable Development September 2019 ISBN 978-92-61-28971-3 9 7 8 9 2 6 1 2 8 9 7 1 3 Published in Switzerland broadbandcommission.org Geneva, 2019 THE STATE OF BROADBAND 2019 Broadband as a Foundation for Sustainable Development ITU/UNESCO Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development © International Telecommunication Union and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https:// creativecommons .org/ licenses/by -nc -sa/ 3 .0/ igo).). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that ITU or UNESCO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The unauthorized use of the ITU or UNESCO names or logos is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) or the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Neither ITU nor UNESCO are responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Broadband 2020: Tackling Digital Inequalities a Decade for Action
    The State of Broadband: Tackling digital inequalities A decade for action September 2020 The State of Broadband 2020: Tackling digital inequalities A decade for action September 2020 © International Telecommunication Union and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO license (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https:// creativecommons .org/ licenses/ by -nc -sa/ 3 .0/ igo). Under the terms of this license, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that ITU or UNESCO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The unauthorized use of the ITU or UNESCO names or logos is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons license. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) or the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Neither ITU nor UNESCO are responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the license shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization (http:// www .wipo .int/ amc/ en/ mediation/ rules). Suggested citation. State of Broadband Report 2020: Geneva: International Telecommunication Union and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadband Catalyzing Sustainable Development September 2016
    The State of Broadband: Broadband catalyzing sustainable development September 2016 THE STATE OF BROADBAND 2016: BROADBAND CATALYZING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT September 2016 This Report has been written collaboratively, drawing on insights and rich contributions from a range of Commissioners and their organizations. It has been compiled and edited by the chief editor and co-author, Phillippa Biggs of ITU, with Jie Huang, Simon de Nicola, Ahone Njume- Ebong of ITU as graphic designers. Youlia Lozanova, Anna Polomska and Nancy Sundberg provided regulatory analysis of National Broadband Plans. Anna Polomska and Arthur Reynolds provided additional research for Chapters 3 and 4. Blandine Bénézit and Cédric Wachholz are co-authors of Chapter 5. Antonio Garcia-Zaballos, Telecom Lead Specialist at IADB, and Natalija Gelvanovska, Senior ICT Policy Specialist at the World Bank, contributed to Chapter 6. Albert Sebgarshad provided secretarial support. Esperanza Magpantay provided statistical insight and data. Contributors are listed in order and under their contribution. We wish to thank the following people for their contributions, kind review and comments (listed in alphabetical order of institution, followed by alphabetical order of surname): • Sunil Bharti Mittal, Chairman, Bharti Airtel Limited (Bharti Airtel); • John Garrity, Connie Lasalle and Dr. Robert Pepper (Cisco); • Prof. Abdulaziz Salem Al Ruwais (Governor of CITC, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia); • Heather Johnson, Richard Möller, Kenneth Wallstedt and Elaine Weidman-Grunewald (Ericsson);
    [Show full text]
  • Broadband Service by Local Residents and Businesses by Adoption Reducing Barriers and Increasing Awareness of the Internet’S Value to Their Quality of Life
    Broadband in Michigan and Livingston County Status, Developments and the Future DAN MANNING COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY ADVISOR – SOUTHERN MICHIGAN CONNECT MICHIGAN Discussion topics I. Intro to Connect Michigan/Connected Nation II. Broadband status in Michigan III. Broadband status and work in Livingston County IV. Recent developments V. Q&A We value the information Connect Michigan offers to townships around the state, and looks forward to the continuation of Connect Michigan’s mission to facilitate the expansion of broadband access and use throughout the Great Lakes State. – Michigan Townships Association Who we are .Connected Nation, non-profit dedicated to expanding broadband access, adoption, and use. Core competencies include: . Network mapping, validation, and analysis . Residential and business adoption research . Local, state, and national policy analysis and capacity building . Community technology planning Community Mapping .Connect Michigan, subsidiary of Connected Nation Planning (Access) . Partnered with the Michigan Public Service Commission . Collaborate at all levels with a diverse group of stakeholders Research (Adoption & Use) . Broadband mapping, research, and community planning . Host the annual Michigan Broadband Conference in Lansing . Tasked with facilitating the expansion of broadband throughout Michigan We have found Connect Michigan to be an independent, reliable source of information and technical assistance in the realm of broadband issues. – Northern Lakes Economic Alliance Current state of broadband access in Michigan - definition FCC Definition History Household Availability 100% 2009 – 768Kbps/200Kbps 90% 2012 – 4Mbps/1Mbps 80% 99.1% 98.4% 2014 – 10Mbps/1Mbps 70% 96.8% 93.6% 92.7% 89.7% 88.7% 60% 86.7% 2015 – 25Mbps/3Mbps 50% National Broadband Plan 40% Goals: 30% 20% 2015 – 100m homes with 11.4% 50Mbps/20Mbps 10% 4.3% 0% 2020 – 100m homes with 768 Kbps 3 Mbps 10 Mbps 25 Mbps 50 Mbps 100Mbps/50Mbps October 2010 October 2014 There remains a strong grassroots constituency for broadband coverage across our southwest Michigan region.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for the Promotion of Broadband Services and Infrastructure: a Case Study on Mauritius
    MDG # broadband series millennium development goals 8 partnership REGULATORY & MARKET ENVIRONMENT International Telecommunication Union Place des Nations Strategies for the promotion of CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland broadband services and infrastructure: www.itu.int A CASE STUDY ON MAURITIUS BROADBAND SERIES Printed in Switzerland Geneva, 2012 08/2012 Strategies for the promotion of broadband services and infrastructure: a case study on Mauritius This report has been prepared for the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) by Sofie Maddens- Toscano. This study was funded by the ITU and the Broadband Commission for Digital Development. We would especially like to thank Dr K. Oolun, Executive Director, Information and Communications Technologies Authority for his invaluable support. It is part of a new series of ITU reports on broadband that are available online and free of charge at the Broadband Commission website: http://www.broadbandcommission.org/ and at the ITU Universe of Broadband portal: www.itu.int/broadband. Please consider the environment before printing this report. © ITU 2012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. Strategies for the promotion of broadband services and infrastructure: a case study on Mauritius Table of Contents Page Preface ........................................................................................................................................ iii Foreword ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Libraries in National Broadband Plan and Policies
    Working document developed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions and Electronic Information for Libraries within the IGF Dynamic Coalition on Public Access in Libraries The Role of Libraries in National Broadband Plan and Policies Abstract Public internet access in libraries is an important tool to help bring more people online. Including libraries in national broadband plans and policies is a way to support and enable their work towards digital inclusion – and more than 30 national broadband policies today already contain references to libraries. The aim of this project is to compare how national broadband plans currently engage and implicate libraries, highlight the different roles policymakers envision for libraries in providing broader internet access and the types of support libraries can receive. Different broadband plans and policies engage libraries to achieve a number of goals: support public internet access; deliver digital literacy and ICT training; promote e-learning and support formal educational institutions; and create local content by digitising heritage materials. Many plans contain measures to support libraries in fulfilling these tasks: connecting libraries to broadband infrastructure, equipping them with ICT hardware and software, or helping them bear internet subscription costs. A number of plans rely on private-public partnerships and Universal Service Funds to deliver this support; and various soft instruments can be employed to encourage digitisation efforts. Introduction Public
    [Show full text]
  • Broadband the Lifeline of Digital India
    Broadband The lifeline of Digital India November 2014 www.deloitte.com/in “A 10% increase in broadband penetration increases the per capita GDP by 1.38% in the developing countries.” World Bank 2 Contents Foreword 4 Message from Aegis School of Business 5 Broadband: The story so far 6 Broadband: The next basic utility 13 Challenges: The roadblocks on Broadband Highway 16 Broadband deployment: A long term view 18 Public Private Participation: The success mantra 20 Recommendations: The accelerators for Broadband Highways 22 About Deloitte 24 About Aegis School of Business 25 References 26 Broadband The lifeline of Digital India 3 Foreword The focus of the Government to build Digital India services. Wireless Internet connectivity is being built into through broadband highways connecting every an increasing number of consumer electronics. This leads household, village, panchayat, universities, and to enormous opportunities for smart homes, smart cars, government departments will go a long way in providing and even smart cities where everything is connected and solution to the never ending problems of rural India could be controlled remotely. Digitization of data is also and to create smarter villages. As part of the digital a strong enabler of broadband applications and services. agenda, the new Government wants to make every household and every individual digitally empowered. The However, for broadband to gain acceptance among emphasis in budget on e-Governance, computerization, the general populace, service providers and others e-Visas, FDI in e-Commerce, digital classrooms, etc. must deliver applications that bring tangible value to will need high speed broadband connectivity. Digital peoples’ lives.
    [Show full text]
  • National Broadband Plans”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No
    Please cite this paper as: OECD (2011-06-15), “National Broadband Plans”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 181, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kg9sr5fmqwd-en OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 181 National Broadband Plans OECD Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2010)9/FINAL Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 15-Jun-2011 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY COMMITTEE FOR INFORMATION, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2010)9/FINAL Working Party on Communication Infrastructures and Services Policy NATIONAL BROADBAND PLANS English - Or. English JT03303792 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2010)9/FINAL FOREWORD In December 2010 this report was presented to the Working Party on Communication Infrastructure and Services (CISP). It was recommended to be made public by the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy (ICCP) in March 2011. The report was prepared by Mr Ewan Sutherland. It is published on the responsibility of the Secretary General of the OECD. OECD ©2011 2 DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2010)9/FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................................. 2 NATIONAL BROADBAND
    [Show full text]