Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 52 Number 3 Spring 2018 Spring 2018 Stinging the Stingray: The Need for Strong State-Level Anti- Surveillance Legislation Gregory Maleska Valparaiso University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Gregory Maleska, Stinging the Stingray: The Need for Strong State-Level Anti-Surveillance Legislation, 52 Val. U. L. Rev. (2018). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol52/iss3/6 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at
[email protected]. Maleska: Stinging the Stingray: The Need for Strong State-Level Anti-Surve STINGING THE STINGRAY: THE NEED FOR STRONG STATE-LEVEL ANTI-SURVEILLANCE LEGISLATION I. INTRODUCTION Daniel Rigmaiden, known to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as “the Hacker,” is the man who revealed the Stingray to the public.1 For Rigmaiden, it all started in the Los Padres National Forest in California.2 There, Rigmaiden, who had virtually no connections to the outside world, devised a tax-fraud scheme.3 Using only his laptop and AirCard, a device that is used to get Internet service for a laptop via cellphone tower, Rigmaiden successfully filed hundreds of fraudulent tax returns from deceased Californians.4 Rigmaiden’s only problem was accessing