United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM 1:19-10051 Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11

#1.00 Hendrix creditors' motion for order appointing chapter 11 trustee pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 1104(a) or converting debtor's case to chapter 7 pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 1112

Docket 9

Tentative Ruling: For the reasons discussed below, the Court will order the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee.

I. BACKGROUND

On January 9, 2019, Rockin Artwork, LLC ("Rockin") filed a voluntary chapter 11 petition, initiating case 1:19-bk-10051-VK. That day, Properties, LLC ("PH Properties," and together with Rockin, "Entity Debtors") also filed a voluntary chapter 11 petition, initiating case 1:19-bk-10052-VK. On January 11, 2019, Andrew Marc Pitsicalis (together with Entity Debtors, "Debtors") filed a voluntary chapter 11 petition, initiating case 1:19-bk-10062-VK. On January 18, 2019, the Court entered an order approving of joint administration of Entity Debtors’ cases [1:19-bk-10051-VK, doc. 18].

According to Mr. Pitsicalis, Mr. Pitsicalis and Leon Hendrix ("Leon") own Entity Debtors [Declaration of Andrew Pitsicalis ("Pitsicalis Decl."), ¶ 6]. Mr. Pitsicalis is the managing member, chief executive officer and sole employee of Entity Debtors, and Leon is a member of the board of directors. Id. Entity Debtors allegedly hold licensing, ownership and other rights to certain intellectual property rights related to deceased rock artist and his brother, Leon. Id.

A. The Washington Action and California Action

In March 2009, Experience Hendrix, LLC and Authentic Hendrix, LLC (together, "Movants") filed suit against Mr. Pitsicalis, among others, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington for federal trademark infringement,

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 1 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM CONT... Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11 false designation of origin/federal unfair competition, violation of the Washington consumer protection act, contributory infringement and unjust enrichment (the "Washington Action") [Declaration of Jason Strabo "Strabo Decl.," Exh. 1; Pitsicalis Decl., ¶ 14].

On July 24, 2015, Mr. Pitsicalis and Movants entered into a settlement agreement and stipulated judgment (the "Agreement"). Strabo Decl., Exh. 1. Under the Agreement, Mr. Pitsicalis agreed to pay Movants $500,000.00 in installments. Id. Mr. Pitsicalis defaulted on required installment payments under the Agreement, which lead to default being entered in the Washington Action on August 24, 2017, in the amount of $482,500.00 (the "Judgment"). Id.

On September 28, 2017, Movants registered the Judgment with the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the "California Action"). Id. On March 19, 2018, Movants filed an application for a charging order for the membership interest of Mr. Pitsicalis in Entity Debtors and the appointment of a receiver. Id. On April 23, 2018, the district court entered an order granting that application and appointed a receiver (the "Charging Order"). Id. In the Charging Order, the district court noted, in relevant part:

[Movants] have submitted evidence to the Court showing that Judgment Debtors [FN1] have used Rockin Artwork and Purple Haze Properties (in conjunction with other corporate entities) to make financial transactions on the Judgment Debtor’s [sic] behalf. For example, in November 2016, while defaulting on his settlement payments, Pitsicalis transferred title to a house that he owned in Las Vegas (the "Las Vegas Home") to Rockin Artwork for $1. Pitsicalis, as the controlling member of Rockin Artwork, then took out a loan on the Las Vegas Home and used that money as a down payment to purchase a $2.8 million home in Lake Sherwood, California (the "Lake Sherwood Home"). The Lake Sherwood Home is being used by Pitsicalis and his family. . . .

Pitsicalis also stopped using his personal checking account after he depleted it of funds. Instead of using his personal funds, Pitsicalis uses Purple Haze Properties and Rockin Artwork to pay for the Lake Sherwood Home’s

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 2 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM CONT... Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11 mortgage and many of Pitsicalis’s living expenses. [Pitsicalis] has also made numerous transfers between these entities and with other companies that he controls. . . .

Furthermore, Pitsicalis has failed to file tax returns for himself and his companies, obscuring the existence of records that would reflect his income and the assets under his control ("I have not filed federal, state, or local taxes for any of my companies or for me personally for the past five years."). . . . Pitsicalis used various corporate entities to pay for multi-million dollar properties and continues to use these entities for other personal expenses. Pitsicalis has also failed to pay taxes for himself or the companies he controls, failed to maintain corporate records, and has failed to notify the Court of newly-created corporate entities. The record also shows that Pitsicalis frequently transfers money back and forth between his various companies, and continues to form new entities. This record indicates that there is a probability of fraudulent conduct, a danger that Pitsicalis’s assets are in imminent danger of being concealed, and that the legal remedies attempted thus far have been inadequate. . . .

Given this record,…the Court finds that appointment of a receiver is appropriate.

Charging Order, pp. 1-11.

In the California Action, the district court appointed a receiver. "The receiver was to (1) have full access to the business records of the Charged Entities [FN2]; (2) review and approval all expenditures by the Charged Entities; (3) make any necessary inquiries to ensure Movants are paid; and (4) demand, collect, receive and distribute to Movants all distributions by the Charged Entities that would otherwise be paid to Mr. Pitsicalis." Strabo Decl., Exh. 2 (emphasis in original).

In the California Action, on January 3, 2019, the district court entered an order holding Mr. Pitsicalis in civil contempt for violating the Charging Order (the

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 3 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM CONT... Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11 "Contempt Order"). Strabo Decl., Exh. 3. The court found that Mr. Pitsicalis violated the Charging Order by: "(1) failing to secure approval from the appointed Receiver … for all expenditures by charged entities [Purple Haze Properties, LLC] and [Rockin Artwork, LLC] as required by the [Charging Order]; failing to provide to [Movants] distributions to which [Movants] were entitled; and failing to deliver to the Receiver all books, records, and other reports to which the Receiver is entitled under the terms of the Charging Order." Id. Pursuant to the Contempt Order, in addition to being held in civil contempt, Mr. Pitsicalis was to, among other things, transfer financial control over Entity Debtors to the apppointed receiver, deliver to Movants all funds disbursed from or expended by either Entity Debtor that were not approved, either expressly or retroactively, by the receiver and to pay Movants’ reasonable fees and costs. Id.

Six days after the Contempt Order was entered, Entity Debtors filed their bankruptcy petitions; eight days after the Contempt Order was entered, Mr. Pitsicalis filed his bankruptcy petition.

B. The New York Action

In March 2017, Movants filed suit against Debtors, among others, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "New York Action"). Pitsicalis Decl., ¶ 15. Movants alleged that Debtors were improperly exploiting the intellectual property rights of Jimi Hendrix.

During the pendency of the New York Action, Movants brought a motion to sanction Debtors, among others, for spoliation of evidence and discovery abuses (the "Motion for Sanctions"). Strabo Decl., Exh. 9. On October 26, 2018, the court held an evidentiary hearing on the Motion for Sanctions. Id. Mr. Pitisicals testified at that hearing. Id. On November 27, 2018, the court entered an opinion and order granting the Motion for Sanctions. Id. The court granted Movants’ request for an adverse inference instruction at trial and directed Debtors, among others, to pay $77,633.87 for fees and costs incurred by Movants in bringing the Motion for Sanctions. Id.

The court in the New York Action found that Debtors repeatedly and intentionally breached their duty to assure the preservation and production of records by: (1) the use of cleaning software on covered computing devices, including on Mr. Pitsicalis’ computer; (2) the failure to disclose the existence of a seventh computing device in

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 4 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM CONT... Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11 Pitsicalis’ office containing potentially relevant documents that was supposedly taken to Florida before it could be reviewed; and (3) the deletion of more than 500 relevant test messages, including nine that explicitly used the term "Jimi."

In the New York Action, on December 12, 2018, the court issued an order setting an evidentiary hearing for the week of January 7, 2019; Mr. Pitsicalis was to testify at that hearing. Strabo Decl., Exh. 10. During the New York Action, Mr. Pitsicalis and Entity Debtors maintained and used two email accounts. Id. During the New York Action, the contents of these accounts, predating February 2018, were permanently deleted. Id. The evidentiary hearing was to determine, among other things, whether the deletion of the contents of these accounts was an intentional act of spoliation, meriting further sanctions. Id. Debtors filed their chapter 11 petitions during the week that the evidentiary hearing was to occur.

C. Mr. Pitsicalis’ Schedules and Statements

On February 4, 2019, Mr. Pitsicalis filed his schedules and statements [1:19- bk-10062-VK, doc. 30]. In his schedule A/B, Mr. Pitsicalis indicated that he does not own any interest in real property. He represented that he owns 7.5 million shares of GRCU, valued at $37,500.00, that the value of his equity interest in Rockin is $250,000.00, and that the value of his equity interest in PH Properties is $375,000.00.

In his schedule E/F, Mr. Pitsicalis listed the Franchise Tax Board and the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") as priority unsecured creditors. Id. Mr. Pitsicalis listed the amount of each of their claims as "unknown."

In his schedule E/F, Mr. Pitsicalis listed nonpriority general unsecured claims totaling $553,916.00, which included a $500,000.00 disputed claim of Movants. Mr. Pitsicalis also listed a $7,500.00 nonpriority general unsecured claim of Mike Mclain and a $10,500.00 nonpriority general unsecured claim of William Pitsicalis; these claims are described as arising from personal loans.

In his schedule I, Mr. Pitsicalis indicated that, for four years, he has been employed as the President of PH Properties, and is paid $5,000.00 per month. In comparison, in his statement of financial affairs ("SOFA"), Mr. Pitsicalis stated that his gross income from operating a business from January 1, 2019 to the petition date and in 2018 and

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 5 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM CONT... Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11 2017 was "unknown."

D. Entity Debtors’ Schedules

1. Rockin’s Schedules and Statements

On January 23, 2019, Rockin filed its schedules and statements [1:19-bk-10051-VK, doc. 28]. In its schedule A/B, Rockin indicated that owns the real property located at 8221 Sedona Sunrise Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 (the "Las Vegas Property"). Rockin valued the Las Vegas Property at $400,000.00. In schedule D, Rockin represented that the Las Vegas Property is encumbered by a mortgage in the amount of $288,873.96. Rockin did not list an interest in any other real property.

In its schedule A/B, Rockin indicated that it holds an interest in various intangibles or intellectual property rights, including, royalty contracts, licensing agreements and copyrights. Rockin indicated that the value of its interests in intellectual property is "unknown." Rockin also represented that it has unused net operating losses for various tax years; Rockin described the value of those net operating losses as "unknown."

In its List of Creditors Who Have the 20 Largest Unsecured Claims and Are Not Insiders, filed on January 23, 2019, Rockin identified 13 creditors and stated that each of the unsecured claims of these creditors is disputed, subject to setoff and $0.00 in amount, or "unknown." In its schedule E/F, Rockin listed the IRS as a priority unsecured creditor and listed the amount of the IRS claim as "unknown." Rockin also listed fourteen nonpriority general unsecured claims. Rockin indicated that each of the fourteen claims, including those of Movants, relate to pending litigation and is disputed.

In Part 1 of its SOFA, Rockin indicated that its gross revenue from business for January 1, 2019 to the petition date, and in 2018 and 2017 was "unknown" and "Amount TBD."

Rockin scheduled a "potential claim for avoidance of a fraudulent conveyance of real property located at 410 Upper Lake Road, Lake Sherwood, California" to Purple Haze Designs. Rockin represented that this property (the "Lake Sherwood Property") has a value of $2,900,000.00, and is encumbered by $2,600,000.00 in secured debt.

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 6 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM CONT... Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11

In Part 2 of its SOFA, item 4, Rockin represented that on or around June 18, 2019, the Lake Sherwood Property was transferred to Melissa Lemcke, and described Ms. Lemcke as Mr. Pitsicalis’ fiancée [spelled "Financee"] and mother of his daughters. According to Rockin's SOFA, the Lake Sherwood Property "would have been lost if the Lake Sherwood Property was not refinanced and transferred," and that Mr. Pitsicalis, the CEO of Rockin, "is the guarantor under the loan."

In Part 2 of its SOFA, item 4, Rockin indicated that it would supplement its response as to whether other payments or transfers of property, that benefitted an insider, were made within one year of filing its petition. In the meantime, Rockin described the value of any such transfers, excluding the transfer of the Lake Sherwood Property, as $0.00.

2. PH Properties’ Schedules and Statements

On January 23, 2019, PH Properties filed its schedules and statements [1:19- bk-10052-VK, doc. 22]. In its schedule A/B, PH Properties indicated that it has leasehold interests in two real properties, including the Lake Sherwood Property. PH Properties identified the value of these leasehold interests as "unknown."

In its schedule A/B, PH Properties indicated that it holds an interest in various intangibles or intellectual property rights, including, among others, royalty contracts and licensing agreements. PH Properties indicated that the value of its interest in its intellectual property is "unknown." PH Properties indicated that it also has an interest in unused net operating losses for various tax years, with a value described as "unknown."

As additional assets, PH Properties listed a $5,197.14 lease deposit for the lease of real property located in Woodland Hills, California, $5,762.00 in accounts receivable and "3 million shares in GRCU (Green Cures Botanical)," valued at $12,000.00.

In its schedule E/F, PH Properties listed the IRS as a priority unsecured creditor and listed the amount of the claim as "unknown." Like Rockin, PH Properties listed various nonpriority general unsecured claims, in an "unknown" value, from pending litigation. However, PH Properties also listed, among others, the following

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 7 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM CONT... Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11 nonpriority general unsecured claims: (1) $69,000.00 in favor of Ms. Lemcke for rent pursuant to a lease; (2) $7,500.00 in favor of Mike Mclain for amounts owed for a loan; and (3) $10,500.00 in favor of William Pitsicalis for money borrowed and royalty commissions. The amounts allegedly owed to Mr. Mclain and William Pitsicalis are the same as the amounts that Mr. Pitsicalis allegedly owes to these individuals.

In its schedule G, PH Properties indicated that it leases the Lake Sherwood Property, that the base rent is $20,000.00 per month and that the lease ends in April 2021. Schedule G states that Purple Haze Designs, LLC holds title to the Lake Sherwood Property.

According to its schedule G, PH Properties also leases nonresidential real property in Woodland Hills, California; the lease, which ends in February 2021, provides for a base rent of $4,898.80 per month.

Like Rockin, in its SOFA, PH Properties indicated that its gross revenue from January 1, 2019 to the petition date, and in 2018 and 2017 was "unknown." PH Properties also indicated that it would need to supplement whether any payments or transfers of property were made, within one year of it filing its petition, to insiders. Id.

On January 15, 2019, Movants filed a motion, in each of Debtors’ bankruptcy cases, to appoint a chapter 11 trustee or to convert the case to one under chapter 7 (the "Motions") [1:19-bk-10062-VK, doc .8; 1:19-bk-10051-VK, doc. 9; 1:19-bk-10052- VK, doc. 7]. On January 28, 2019, Entity Debtors filed an opposition to the Motions [1:19-bk-10051-VK, doc. 18], and Mr. Pitsicalis filed a joinder [1:19-bk-10062-VK, doc. 26] in that opposition (the "Oppositions"). On February 4, 2019, Movants filed a reply to the Oppositions (the "Replies") [1:19-bk-10051-VK, doc. 43; 1:19-bk-10062- VK, doc. 28].

On February 6, 2019, Ms. Lemcke, Mr. Mclain and William Pitsicalis each filed a declaration in opposition to the Motions (the "Creditor Declarations") [1:19- bk-10051-VK, docs. 47, 48, 49]. In the Creditor Declarations, each individual states that he or she is a creditor of Entity Debtors and Mr. Pitsicalis, and that it is not in the best interest of creditors to appoint a chapter 11 trustee or to convert the cases to cases under chapter 7. In Ms. Lemcke’s declaration, she states that she is "CEO of Purple

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 8 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM CONT... Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11 Haze Designs" [doc. 49]. In William Pitsicalis’ declaration, he states that he is "CEO of GRCU" [doc. 47].

II. DISCUSSION

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1104—

(a) At any time after the commencement of the case but before confirmation of a plan, on request of a party in interest or the United States trustee, and after notice and a hearing, the court shall order the appointment of a trustee—

(1) for cause, including fraud, dishonesty, incompetence, or gross mismanagement of the affairs of the debtor by current management, either before or after the commencement of the case, or similar cause, but not including the number of holders of securities of the debtor or the amount of assets or liabilities of the debtor; or

(2) if such appointment is in the interests of creditors, any equity security holders, and other interests of the estate, without regard to the number of holders of securities of the debtor or the amount of assets or liabilities of the debtor.

"Cause and best interest of creditors and other parties are separate and independent bases for granting a motion to appoint a trustee under 11 U.S.C. § 1104(a)." In re Corona Care Convalescent Corp., 527 B.R. 379, 384 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2015). "The list of the enumerated ‘causes’ under Section 1104(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C., is nonexhaustive." In re Pasadena Adult Residential Care, Inc., 2015 WL 6443216, at *14 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2015) (citing In re Bellevue Place Assocs., 171 B.R. 615, 622-623 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1994)).

"A debtor in possession has the fiduciary duty to preserve assests for the benefits of creditors. When a debtor in possession is incapable of performing these duties a trustee is properly appointed." In re Nautilus of New Mexico, Inc., 83 B.R. 784, 789 (Bankr. D. N.M. 1998).

"The parties seeking appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee under 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b)

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 9 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM CONT... Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11 (1) and/or 1104(a) have the burden of proving appropriate grounds exist for such appointment by the preponderance of the evidence."Corona Care Convalescent Corp., 527 B.R. at 384.

Here, there is cause to order the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee because of Debtors' prepetition wrongful conduct and the gross mismanagement of Entity Debtors' affairs, by Mr. Pitsicalis. Furthermore, appointment of a chapter 11 trustee is in the best interests of creditors.

Debtors' prepetition violations of the Charging Order and intentional spoliation of substantive evidence constitute cause to order the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee. In the California Action, eight days before Mr. Pitsicalis filed his chapter 11 petition, after presentation of evidence, the district court held Mr. Pitsicalis in civil contempt for violating the Charging Order. Strabo Decl., Exh. 3. Among other things, Mr. Pitsicalis failed to secure the receiver’s approval for Entity Debtors’ expenditures and failed to turn over Entity Debtors’ books and records to the receiver, as required by the Charging Order. Id. In the New York Action, Mr. Pitsicalis and Entity Debtors were found, after an evidentiary hearing, to have breached their duty, intentionally and repeatedly, to locate and produce relevant evidence. Strabo Decl., Exh. 9.

Mr. Pitsicalis’ prepetition gross mismanagement of Entity Debtors also constitutes cause for the Court to order the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee. In the California Action, after the presentation of evidence, the district court made specific findings regarding Mr. Pitsicalis’ misuse of corporate assets and gross mismanagement of Entity Debtors, including failure to maintain corporate formalities and keep business records and failure to file tax returns. Strabo Decl., Exh. 1. The court also made a finding that there was a probability of fraudulent conduct and a danger that access to Mr. Pitsicalis’ assets was in imminent danger. Id.

Debtors' transactions regarding the Las Vegas Property and the Lake Sherwood Property may constitute fraudulent transfers. Further, according to the relevant schedules, PH Properties is leasing the Lake Sherwood Property, in which Mr. Pitsicalis and Ms. Lemcke reside [FN3], at a base rent of $20,000.00 per month. The lessor is Purple Haze Designs, i.e., the entity for which Ms. Lemcke states that she is the CEO. See 1:19-bk-10051-VK, doc. 49. The economic legitimacy of this leasing arrangement is questionable, at best.

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 10 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM CONT... Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11

An objective chapter 11 trustee is necessary to investigate such insider transactions, transfers and relationships, and to file avoidance actions, if warranted.

Finally, Debtors have not provided the Court with a complete or accurate picture of their respective estates. Debtors scheduled their income from operation of their businesses for the last three years as "unknown." Entity Debtors also scheduled the value of their interests in significiant assets – their intellectual property – as "unknown." The majority of Debtors' scheduled claims concern pending litigation, and are scheduled in amount as "unknown." The appointment of a chapter 11 trustee is in the best interest of creditors, as the chapter 11 trustee will be able to investigate and assess the assets, income and liabilities of Debtors and, given the conduct of Mr. Pitsicalis, heighten the prospect of a return to creditors.

In the Oppositions, Debtors argue that they have administered their chapter 11 cases effectively, including by filing an application to employ Force 10 Partners as their investment banker [doc. 26] and by identifying a potential buyer of Entity Debtors’ assets. Mr. Pitsicalis also states that he has "brought in" an individual to assist Entity Debtors in completing all outstanding tax returns. Pitsicalis Decl., ¶ 22.

These actions do not eliminate the immediate need for the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee. It appears that Entity Debtors’ current management, Mr. Pitsicalis, who is the managing member, CEO and sole employee of Entity Debtors [Pitsicalis Decl., ¶ 6], is not capable of performing his fiduciary duties to creditors and has grossly mismanaged Entity Debtors.

Regarding the Creditor Declarations, one of the creditors is Mr. Pitsicalis’ fiancée. Supplemental Declaration of Jason D. Strabo, doc. 43, Exh. 17. Another is a relative of Mr. Pitsicalis. Strabo. Decl., Exh. 9, p. 7. As such, these creditors' preferences that Mr. Pitsicalis stay in control of Entity Debtors are suspect and not demonstrative of the needs of non-insider creditors. In light of the above, Movants have met their burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Court should order the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee.

III. CONCLUSION

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 11 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM CONT... Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11 For the reasons discussed above, the Court will order the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee in Debtors' respective cases.

Movants must submit the order within seven (7) days.

FOOTNOTES

1. The district court defined "Judgment Debtors" as Mr. Pitsicalis and HendixLicening.com, Ltd. HendixLicening.com, Ltd. was an entity that was owned by Mr. Pitsicalis. [Supplemental Declaration of Jason D. Strabo, doc. 43, Exh. 16]. 2. The district court defined "Charged Entities" as Rockin and PH Properties. 3. 1:19-bk-10062-VK, doc. 1, p. 2; see also Charging Order, p. 4; Declaration of Jason D. Strabo, doc. 53, Exh. 23, pp. 4-5.

Evidentiary Objections

Tentative ruling regarding the evidentiary objections to the identified paragraphs in the Declarations set forth below:

Movants’ Objections to Declaration of Andrew Pitsicalis

para. 20: overruled

paras. 2, 10, 12 and 13: sustained

para. 14: sustained as to "Undeterred by the district court’s ruling in the Foundation Lawsuit," overrule as to the balance of the paragraph

para. 15: sustained as to "Having largely been unsuccessful in the Washington Cases (and any appeals thereof" and as to "Despite the fact that the New York Lawsuit was pending, Janie engaged in malicious tactics to interfere with the Debtors’ licensing

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 12 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM CONT... Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11 contracts related to their Intellectual Property Rights," overrule as to the balance of the paragraph

Party Information Debtor(s): Rockin Artwork, LLC Represented By David B Golubchik Jeffrey S Kwong

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 13 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM 1:19-10052 Purple Haze Properties, LLC Chapter 11

#2.00 Hendrix creditors' motion for order appointing chapter 11 trustee pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 1104(a) or converting debtor's case to chapter 7 pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 1112

Docket 7

Tentative Ruling: See calendar no. 1. Party Information Debtor(s): Purple Haze Properties, LLC Represented By David B Golubchik Jeffrey S Kwong

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 14 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM 1:19-10062 Andrew Marc Pitsicalis Chapter 11

#3.00 Hendrix creditors' motion for order appointing chapter 11 trustee pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 1104(a) or converting debtor's case to chapter 7 pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 1112

Docket 8

Tentative Ruling: See calendar no. 1. Party Information Debtor(s): Andrew Marc Pitsicalis Pro Se

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 15 of 16 United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California San Fernando Valley Judge Victoria Kaufman, Presiding Courtroom 301 Calendar

Monday, February 11, 2019 Hearing Room 301

2:00 PM 1:19-10051 Rockin Artwork, LLC Chapter 11

#4.00 Motion To Strike "Supplemental Declaration [Of] Jason D. Strabo In Support Of Hendrix Creditors' Reply In Support Of Motion For Order Appointing Chapter 11 Trustee Pursuant To Bankruptcy Code Section 1104(A) Or Converting Debtor's Case To Bankruptcy Code Section 1112"

Docket 54

Tentative Ruling: Deny.

Party Information Debtor(s): Rockin Artwork, LLC Represented By David B Golubchik Jeffrey S Kwong

2/11/2019 11:13:41 AM Page 16 of 16