Promoting a More Transparent and Accountable NATO

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Promoting a More Transparent and Accountable NATO Issue 55: January 2021 Promoting a more transparent and accountable NATO www.natowatch.org NATO Watch Observatory In this edition: No. 55 (September-December NATO Watch Essay: 3 2020) Meet the new boss, same as the old boss? NATO and Joe Biden News, Commentary & Reports: Published by - Arctic Security 6 NATO Watch - Arms Control and Disarmament: Gairloch, Scotland Open Skies Treaty and New START 6 IV212DS - Belarus Crisis 8 - China-NATO relations 8 - Climate Change 8 Editor: Dr. Ian Davis - Collective Defence 9 - COVID-19 and Resilience 9 - Cyber Security, Information Warfare Welcome to NATO Watch’s quarterly Observatory: the only online publication & Hybrid Threats 11 dedicated entirely to news and independent - Defence Budgets, Procurement & commentary on NATO policy-making and Burden Sharing 12 operational activities. The clips are drawn - Energy Security 13 from a wide range of subscriptions, feeds - Enlargement & Partnerships 14 and alerts covering a substantial part of the - Bosnia Herzegovina; Colombia; EU-NATO major English language newspapers and relations; Georgia; Serbia; South Korea; Sweden; Ukraine other periodicals worldwide. - Intra-NATO conflict in the Eastern Mediterranean 17 NATO Watch - Maritime Security 19 conducts independent monitoring and - Military Exercises 20 analysis of NATO and aims to increase - Missile Defence 20 transparency, stimulate parliamentary - Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict 20 engagement and broaden public awareness - NATO 2030 Reflection Group 21 and participation in a progressive reform - NATO Defence Ministers Meeting - agenda within NATO. October 2020 23 - NATO Foreign Ministers Meeting – December 2020 24 - NATO Military Committee 25 - NATO Parliamentary Assembly 26 - Nuclear Weapons and the TPNW 26 - Operations and Missions 29 - Afghanistan; Iraq; Kosovo - Russia-NATO Relations 33 - Special Forces 35 - Space Policy 35 - Transatlantic Cooperation 36 - Transparency and Accountability 38 - Women, Peace and Security 38 Security News from NATO Member States 39 - Albania; Bulgaria; Canada; Croatia; Copyright © NATO Watch, 2021. Some rights Czech Republic; Denmark; Estonia; reserved. This publication is made available under a Creative France; Germany; Greece; Iceland; Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 licence, which allows copy Italy; Latvia; Lithuania; Montenegro; and distribution for non-profit use, provided the Netherlands; North Macedonia; authors and NATO Watch are attributed properly and Norway; Poland; Romania; Turkey; UK; the text is not altered in any way. All citations must be credited to NATO Watch and/or the original sources. USA 2 NATO Watch Essay: On the positive side of the ledger are also pledges from the President-elect to re-join the Paris Agreement on climate Meet the new boss, same change, the Iran nuclear deal (if Tehran as the old boss? also complies) and the World Health Organization. However, with threat NATO and Joe Biden perceptions differing markedly across the alliance, especially in relation to 2020 was a year like no recent other: Russia and China, democratic the worst pandemic for a hundred backsliding among several NATO years, the worst economic contraction members, allied warships facing off in since the Second World War and the the Eastern Mediterranean and final year of arguably the worst differences about how quickly to exit president to ever set foot in the White Afghanistan, the new president’s House. If the three COVID-19 vaccines honeymoon period is likely to be short. undergoing authorization for use was the main feelgood event at the close of Moreover, under Trump’s ‘America the year, the election of Joe Biden to the First’ agenda NATO emerged relatively White House ran a close second, unscathed. Despite some troop especially within NATO circles. But just movements out of Germany the US as the vaccines will do little to address military presence in Europe continued the economic turmoil caused by the to grow—the European Deterrence pandemic (and especially the pre- Initiative increased during Trump’s existing societal weaknesses and presidency from $3.4 billion in the last inequalities), the new leadership in the year of the Obama administration to United States is unlikely to provide the $4.5 billion in the 2021 military budget inspiration and new thinking that is request. Moreover, Trump’s complaints needed to prioritise non-traditional about defence burden-sharing were security threats, such as climate nothing new, even if his approach was change, irregular migration and far grainier. Similarly, while he also pandemics, or address the twin spread anxiety about the solidity of the elephants in NATO HQ: US US commitment to collective defence exceptionalism and militarism. under Article V and even hinted at times about leaving NATO, both were Certainly, there will a presidential outlier positions in the broader US body bounce effect with a return to some politic. So, what can we expect from elements of Pre-Trump NATO unity. Biden in relation to some of NATO’s During a conversation with the NATO core concerns? Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg, on 23 November President-elect Joe Biden Relations with Europe: underscored the importance of NATO Biden will seek to patch-up relations to US and European security. In a with Germany and France, as part of a statement the US transition team reinvigorated approach to Europe. For highlighted a “desire to engage in example, he is likely to review and consultations with allies on the full probably reverse the US troop range of transatlantic security issues” movements out of Germany (despite a and “to ensure NATO has the strategic strong argument that fewer US troops orientation and capabilities it needs to are needed in Europe to sustain the strengthen deterrence and to counter core NATO objective). However, since a new and emerging threats, including Biden presidency alone will not reset climate change and global health America’s image as a reliable ally security”. interest in European strategic autonomy—either as a distinct pillar within NATO or under EU leadership— 3 is unlikely to disappear. France (and the to adopt a very different tone but may EU) in particular will continue to seek a still make some moves towards longer-term hedge against an building a rapprochement with Russia unpredictable United States and the on some issues. However, this is spectre of a future return to Trumpism. unlikely to involve a radical departure Since Europe does not face any major from ‘deterrence and dialogue’ (but external security threat remotely on par with an overwhelming emphasis on with the former Soviet Union, European deterrence) that has been the core of strategic autonomy can be achieved NATO’s approach for at least the last without the huge hikes in military decade. spending that are being encouraged within NATO. Despite Russia being a diminished power that poses no threat of large- Military spending: scale territorial expansion across Some areas of friction with Europe will Europe, Biden’s traditionalism means persist as Biden’s administration that he will be content for NATO to treat continues the emphasis on fairer Russia in almost the same way it burden sharing. While this will mean treated the Soviet Union fifty years ago. continued calls for increased European While it would be naïve to see Russia in military spending, it is less clear 2021 as an ally, it is equally misplaced whether it will involve his own to treat almost everything that Moscow administration addressing the says and does with resentment. By ‘pandemic of Pentagon spending’. The maintaining traditional strategic latest US defence bill, approved despite alliances and adversarial divisions, a President Trump’s efforts to veto it, Biden presidency is likely to miss earmarks $740 billion—$2,235 for opportunities for new engagement and each American woman, man and policy innovation towards Russia. child—to the Pentagon, and is more China: than the defence budgets of the next ten biggest-spending countries Biden views China as “the greatest combined. strategic challenge to the United States and our allies in Asia and in Europe” Since most of Biden’s ‘transition team’ making this one of the few areas in for the Pentagon come from the which he and Trump are in agreement. hawkish Washington think tanks and It also chimes with the new NATO eight of them come from organisations, Expert Group report, ‘NATO 2030: think tanks or companies with links to United for a New Era’, which concludes the weapons industry, it is likely to be that the rise of China is the single business as usual. Biden has said that biggest, most consequential change in Trump “abandoned all fiscal discipline NATO's strategic environment. Whether when it comes to defence spending”, Europe also sees China as a strategic but this is unlikely to mean major US competitor remains an open question, defence cuts. Instead, Biden has said he although the outlook for transatlantic would shift investments from “legacy alignment is likely to be better with a systems that won’t be relevant” to Biden administration. But his “get “smart investments in technologies and tough with China” message is likely to innovations”. This focus on unmanned return NATO to precarious Cold War-era capacity, cyber and IT could even mean communist containment strategies that an increase in spending. will alienate Beijing and heighten tensions. Russia: While Trump boasted about having a NATO’s mission in Afghanistan: good relationship with the Russian Under Biden the war in Afghanistan will President Vladimir Putin, Biden is likely transition to a fourth US administration 4 over almost 20 years of conflict. While new low-yield W76-2 warheads, Biden (like Trump) has vowed to bring although production is now reported to US combat troops home from be complete. However, Biden is unlikely Afghanistan, he is likely to leave to drop plans to build a new nuclear residual counterterrorism forces and intercontinental ballistic missile force will look to coordinate the withdrawal to replace the Minuteman III fleet (if it happens) with NATO allies.
Recommended publications
  • First Wave COVID-19 Pandemics in Greece Anastasiou E., Duquenne M-N
    First wave COVID-19 pandemics in Greece Anastasiou E., Duquenne M-N. The role of demographic, social and geographical factors In life satisfaction during the lockdown Preprint: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23684.55689 First wave COVID-19 pandemics in Greece: The role of demographic, social and geographical factors in life satisfaction during the lockdown Evgenia Anastasiou, Marie-Noelle Duquenne Laboratory of Demographic and Social Analyses (LDSA) Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract The onset of the coronavirus pandemic led to profound changes in populations' everyday lives. The main purpose of this research is to investigate the factors that affected life satisfaction during the first lockdown wave in Greece. A web-based survey was developed, and 4,305 questionnaires were completed corresponding to all Greek regional units. Statistical modeling (Multivariate Logistic Regression) was performed to evaluate in which extent significant geographical attributes and socioeconomic characteristics are likely to influence life satisfaction during the lockdown due to the pandemic. In the course of the present work, key findings emerge: Social distancing and confinement measures affected mostly men in relation to women. There is a strong positive association between life satisfaction and age, especially as regards older population. The change in the employment status, the increase in psychosomatic disorders and the increased usage of social media are also likely to impact negatively people’s life satisfaction. On the contrary, trust in government and the media and limited health concerns seem to have a strong association with subjective well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Issn 2654-1823
    SAFEGREECE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS ISSN 2654-1823 14-17.10 proceedings SafeGreece 2020 – 7th International Conference on Civil Protection & New Technologies 14‐16 October, on‐line | www.safegreece.gr/safegreece2020 | [email protected] Publisher: SafeGreece [www.safegreece.org] Editing, paging: Katerina – Navsika Katsetsiadou Title: SafeGreece 2020 on‐line Proceedings Copyright © 2020 SafeGreece SafeGreece Proceedings ISSN 2654‐1823 SafeGreece 2020 on-line Proceedings | ISSN 2654-1823 index About 1 Committees 2 Topics 5 Thanks to 6 Agenda 7 Extended Abstracts (Oral Presentations) 21 New Challenges for Multi – Hazard Emergency Management in the COVID-19 Era in Greece Evi Georgiadou, Hellenic Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (ELINYAE) 23 An Innovative Emergency Medical Regulation Model in Natural and Manmade Disasters Chih-Long Pan, National Yunlin University of Science and technology, Taiwan 27 Fragility Analysis of Bridges in a Multiple Hazard Environment Sotiria Stefanidou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 31 Nature-Based Solutions: an Innovative (Though Not New) Approach to Deal with Immense Societal Challenges Thanos Giannakakis, WWF Hellas 35 Coastal Inundation due to Storm Surges on a Mediterranean Deltaic Area under the Effects of Climate Change Yannis Krestenitis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 39 Optimization Model of the Mountainous Forest Areas Opening up in Order to Prevent and Suppress Potential Forest Fires Georgios Tasionas, Democritus University of Thrace 43 We and the lightning Konstantinos Kokolakis,
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Communism, Neoliberalisation, Fascism by Bozhin Stiliyanov
    Post-Socialist Blues Within Real Existing Capitalism: Anti-Communism, Neoliberalisation, Fascism by Bozhin Stiliyanov Traykov A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology University of Alberta © Bozhin Stiliyanov Traykov, 2020 Abstract This project draws on Alex William’s (2020) contribution to Gramscian studies with the concept of complex hegemony as an emergent, dynamic and fragile process of acquiring power in socio- political economic systems. It examines anti-communism as an ideological element of neoliberal complex hegemony in Bulgaria. By employing a Gramcian politico-historical analysis I explore examples of material and discursive ideological practices of anti-communism. I show that in Bulgaria, anti-communism strives to operate as hegemonic, common-sensual ideology through legislative acts, production of historiography, cultural and educational texts, and newly invented traditions. The project examines the process of rehabilitation of fascist figures and rise of extreme nationalism, together with discrediting of the anti-fascist struggle and demonizing of the welfare state within the totalitarian framework of anti-communism. Historians Enzo Traverso (2016, 2019), Domenico Losurdo (2011) and Ishay Landa (2010, 2016) have traced the undemocratic roots of economic liberalism and its (now silenced) support of fascism against the “Bolshevik threat.” They have shown that, whether enunciated by fascist regimes or by (neo)liberal intellectuals, anti-communism is deeply undemocratic and shares deep mass-phobic disdain for political organizing of the majority. In this dissertation I argue that, in Bulgaria, anti- communism has not only opened the ideological space for extreme right and fascist politics, it has demoralized left political organizing by attacking any attempts for a politics of socio- economic justice as tyrannical.
    [Show full text]
  • GREECE © Gettyimages, Poike
    GREECE © gettyimages, Poike The Environmental Implementation Review 2019 COUNTRY REPORT GREECE Environment EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.4.2019 SWD(2019) 138 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT The EU Environmental Implementation Review 2019 Country Report - GREECE Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Environmental Implementation Review 2019: A Europe that protects its citizens and enhances their quality of life {COM(2019) 149 final} - {SWD(2019) 111 final} - {SWD(2019) 112 final} - {SWD(2019) 113 final} - {SWD(2019) 114 final} - {SWD(2019) 115 final} - {SWD(2019) 116 final} - {SWD(2019) 117 final} - {SWD(2019) 118 final} - {SWD(2019) 119 final} - {SWD(2019) 120 final} - {SWD(2019) 121 final} - {SWD(2019) 122 final} - {SWD(2019) 123 final} - {SWD(2019) 124 final} - {SWD(2019) 125 final} - {SWD(2019) 126 final} - {SWD(2019) 127 final} - {SWD(2019) 128 final} - {SWD(2019) 129 final} - {SWD(2019) 130 final} - {SWD(2019) 131 final} - {SWD(2019) 132 final} - {SWD(2019) 133 final} - {SWD(2019) 134 final} - {SWD(2019) 135 final} - {SWD(2019) 136 final} - {SWD(2019) 137 final} - {SWD(2019) 139 final} EN EN This report has been written by the staff of the Directorate-General for Environment, European Commission. Comments are welcome, please send them to [email protected] More information on the European Union is available at http://europa.eu. Photographs: p. 11 — ©iStock/Poike; p. 14 — ©iStock/SHansche; p. 16 — ©iStock/saiko3p; p. 20 — ©iStock/marchello74; p. 29 — © iStock/alexandr6868 For reproduction or use of these photos, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • Commissioner Ylva Johansson (Migration
    Committee on Budgetary Control 2019 Discharge to the Commission WRITTEN QUESTIONS TO COMMISSIONER JOHANSSON Hearing on 30 November 2020 Questions concerning general issues 1. Are there programs affected by decommitment rule in 2019? What is the forecast for decommitment level at the end of the programming period and what measures does the Commission undertake to assist Member States to avoid decommitments? Commission’s answer: Programmes affected by the decommitment rule In 2019, the first decommitment exercise concerning the financial year 2016 was launched for the three Member States whose declaration of expenditure was substantially below the committed amounts in the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) (Portugal with € 0.4 million, Czechia with € 11.1 million and Hungary with € 0.002 million). In 2020 for the financial year 2017, the amounts were higher given the overall higher budgetary commitments. For the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the affected Member States are: Czechia € 2.2 million, Hungary € 2.7 million, Ireland € 7.1 million, Luxemburg € 0.19 million, Poland € 0.52 million, Slovakia € 1.2 million and Bulgaria € 0.002 million. Under the Internal Security Fund (ISF)-Police, France is affected by € 2.4 million. Forecast decommitment level The programme implementation of the national programmes under the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund and the Internal Security Fund is at cruising speed and we are carefully monitoring this promising progress. The cumulative disbursement to the Member States since the beginning of the Funds’ implementation amounts to: - Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund: € 2.5 billion - Internal Security Fund: € 1.6 billion These figures confirm a rising trend of absorption and we expect reduced risks of decommitment at the end of the eligibility period (December 2022).
    [Show full text]
  • European Security and Defence
    Berlin BSC Security Conference 17th Congress on European Security and Defence European Security and Defence – remaining Transatlantic, acting more European 27 – 28 November 2018 About the Congress: » One of the largest yearly events on European Security and Defence Vienna House Andel’s Berlin » Meeting place for up to 1 000 participants from more than Landsberger Allee 106 50 countries D-10369 Berlin » International forum for members of parliament, politicians and representatives of the armed forces, security organisations and www.euro-defence.eu industry » Partner in 2018: The Netherlands » Former Partners: Russia, United Kingdom, Turkey, USA, France, Sweden » Exhibition with companies from Europe and abroad » Organised by the – Germany’s leading independent Newspaper for the Civil and Military Services Advisory Board Prof Ioan Mircea Pa s¸ cu Niels Annen Michel Barnier Wolfgang Hellmich MEP, Vice-President of the European Parliament, MP, Minister of State, Chief Negotiator, Head of MP, Chairman of former Defence Minister of Romania, Congress German Federal Foreign Task Force under Article the Defence Committee, President BSC 2018 Office 50 TEU with UK, former German Bundestag Advisor of President Juncker on Security and Defence, European Commission Dr Hans-Gert Pöttering Ambassador Ji r˘ í S˘ ediv´y Dr Peter Tauber Dr Karl von Wogau Robert Walter former President of the Permanent Represen- MP, Parliamentary State Secretary General of President of the European Parliament, tative of the Czech Secretary, German Federal the Kangaroo Group,
    [Show full text]
  • The Nation of the Educated, American College in Greece
    “THE NATION OF THE EDUCATED” JON WESTLING President, Boston University I am very pleased to be here today. I come partly as an emissary of the New World, the “America” inscribed in the name of the American College of Greece, and partly as a fellow collegian. For though I am not a graduate of Deree College, I join you today as a fellow reader of worthy books, fellow examiner of important ideas, and fellow seeker of such truth as may be gained by means of disciplined intellectual inquiry and respect for evidence--as a fellow collegian in the fullest sense of that word. Customarily, emissaries present their hosts with gifts. I offer only a gift of words. I hope to give you something worth keeping, but I know that words of advice are among the rare presents that are preferred in very small quantities. When our national poet, Walt Whitman, proposed to speak for America, he proclaimed, “I am large, I contain multitudes.” What makes America multitudinous is not the great number of our people. There are nations larger in sheer population. Whitman’s multitude is the multitude of origins and variety: America as a place of immigrants from everywhere, and America as a place of vast, multitudinous mingling. 2 In this sense, since its founding, the United States has provided a continuing commentary on the idea of nationhood. Other nations, comprised in actuality of people from many origins, nonetheless cling to the myth that they share an ancient common origin. The United States stands as a living refutation of that idea of nationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Migrants, Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Greece in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Comparative Cultural Studies: European and Latin American Perspectives 10: 39-58, 2020 DOI: 10.13128/ccselap-12297 | ISSN 2531-9884 (online) Article Migrants, asylum seekers and refugees in Greece in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic THEODOROS FOUSKAS Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. COVID-19 cases detected in accommodation centers in mainland Greece, while thousands of asylum seekers, refugees, and migrants are living under unsafe and degrading conditions at the camps on the Aegean islands and others in the main- land. They live mostly in overcrowded Reception and Identification Centers (RICs) and accommodation centers under deplorable conditions, the lack of proper shelter, the extremely unhygienic living conditions. Migrants, asylum seekers and refugees liv- ing in the RICs faced multiple challenges and vulnerabilities that must be considered when responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Keywords: migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, health, COVID-19, Greece. Riassunto. Alcuni casi di COVID-19 sono stati individuati nei centri di accoglienza della terraferma della Grecia, mentre migliaia di richiedenti asilo, profughi e migranti continuano a vivere in condizioni non salutari e degradanti nei campi delle isole egee e altri nella terraferma. Per lo più, essi vivono nei sovraffollati Centri di Identificazio- ne e di Recezione (RIC) e in centri di accoglienza in condizioni deplorevoli, senza un vero e proprio rifugio, in condizioni di vita estremamente non igieniche. I migranti, i richiedenti asilo e i profughi che vivono nei RIC devono far fronte a diverse sfide e vulnerabilità che devono essere prese in considerazione nel momento di affrontare la pandemia del COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkanologie, Vol. 15 N° 1 | 2020 Chasing the Past on the Margins of Greece 2
    Balkanologie Revue d'études pluridisciplinaires Vol. 15 n° 1 | 2020 Mémoires performatives : faire des passés et des présents Chasing the Past on the Margins of Greece Pierre Sintès, Chasing the Past: Geopolitics of Memory on the Margins of Modern Greece, Liverpool, Provence University Press and Liverpool University Press, 2019. Russell King Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/balkanologie/2554 DOI: 10.4000/balkanologie.2554 ISSN: 1965-0582 Publisher Association française d'études sur les Balkans (Afebalk) Electronic reference Russell King, “Chasing the Past on the Margins of Greece”, Balkanologie [Online], Vol. 15 n° 1 | 2020, Online since 01 June 2020, connection on 05 August 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ balkanologie/2554 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/balkanologie.2554 This text was automatically generated on 5 August 2021. © Tous droits réservés Chasing the Past on the Margins of Greece 1 Chasing the Past on the Margins of Greece Pierre Sintès, Chasing the Past: Geopolitics of Memory on the Margins of Modern Greece, Liverpool, Provence University Press and Liverpool University Press, 2019. Russell King REFERENCES Sintès, Pierre, 2019, Chasing the Past: Geopolitics of Memory on the Margins of Modern Greece, Liverpool, Provence University Press and Liverpool University Press, 236 pages, ISBN 978-1-78694-089-6 1 This is a tour de force of historical geography and contemporary ethnography of migrant communities in Greece. Translated from French by Jenny Money, the author graciously acknowledges the translator’s skill and patience in making the English version “a clearer and more understandable text than the original” (p.9) – the gold-standard achievement of a brilliant translator.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Nikos Dendias Minister of Foreign Affairs 1St Vas. Sofias Av. 106 71 Athens, Greece
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.01.2021 C(2021) 170 final In the published version of this decision, PUBLIC VERSION some information has been omitted, pursuant to articles 30 and 31 of Council This document is made available for Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 information purposes only. laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, concerning non-disclosure of information covered by professional secrecy. The omissions are shown thus […] Subject: State Aid SA.54273 (2019/N) and SA.58386 (2020/FC) – Greece E65 Motorway concession – Trikala-Egnatia (North section) Excellency, 1. PROCEDURE (1) On 6 February 2019, Greece pre-notified to the Commission investment aid, for the construction of the North section of the E65 Motorway, and operating aid, for the operation and maintenance of the same motorway section. The Commission registered this pre-notification under the case number SA.53438 (2019/PN). On 12 February 2019, a meeting took place between the Commission services and the Greek authorities. (2) On 2 May 2019, the Greek authorities notified to the Commission aid in favour of Odos Kentrikis Elladas S.A. (“Kentriki Odos S.A.” or “the concessionaire”) for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Trikala-Egnatia section (“the North section”) of the E65 Motorway. (3) On 26 June 2019, after an initial examination, the Commission services sent a first request for information, to which the Greek authorities replied, after obtaining an extension of the deadline, with letters of 27 August 2019 and 13 September 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgarian Case: from Polarisation to Hegemonisation
    Hyperpoliticisation of asylum and responsibility: The Bulgarian case: from polarisation to hegemonisation Anna Krasteva Chemnitz, November 2018 CEASEVAL RESEARCH ON THE COMMON EUROPEAN ASYLUM SYSTEM; Nr. 15 CEASEVAL Research on the Common European Asylum System publishes results of empirical research conducted for the H2020 Project “CEASEVAL” (Evaluation of the Commom European Asylum System). CEASEVAL received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 770037. Herausgeberschaft: Prof. Birgit Glorius and Dr. Melanie Kintz Technische Universität Chemnitz Institut für Europäische Studien Humangeographie mit Schwerpunkt Europäische Migrationsforschung 09107 Chemnitz http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/phil/europastudien/geographie Alle Rechte vorbehalten, Chemnitz 2018 ISSN 2627-339X Anna Krasteva CERMES, New Bulgarian University [email protected] Hyperpoliticisation of asylum and responsibility: The Bulgarian case: from polarisation to hegemonisation Abstract This analysis serves a two-fold purpose: theoretical and empirical. Its theoretical part reconstructs the concept of politicisation and develops it. The empirical part examines its applicability to the Bulgarian case analysing three types of discorses: political, media, intellectual. The text is structured in three parts. The first part elaborates the theoretical foundation of the analysis, building upon Wilde’s notion of politicisation and extending it in three directions: from politicisation to hyperpoliticisation; from polarisation
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Europe at a Glance
    ISSN: 2654-0304 1 ΜΑΥ 06 - 12, 2019 – VOL. 2 - ISSUE 29 SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE AT A GLANCE SOUTHEAST EUROPE DIRECTORATE PROVIDING KNOWLEDGE TO THOSE WHO SHAPE THE FUTURE “SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE AT A GLANCE” (ISSN: 2654-0304) is a weekly review of the most significant current political, economic, energy, defense, and security news of Southeastern Europe. It covers 14 countries; Albania, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Kosovo, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, and Turkey. However Greece enjoys its own weekly review for a more detailed presentation of its current affairs (GREECE AT A GLANCE). This ambitious newsletter aspires to become an informative “tool” for anyone who is interested in the region and wishes to have knowledge of the non-stop current developments and challenges. “HERMES” Institute is not a news agency and it is not one of its ambitions to become one but it is strongly believed that today’s events provide the necessary material to understand the future and to analyze situations that may affect in peace, stability, and growth of the region. “HERMES” I.I.A.S.GE “HERMES” Institute of International Affairs, Security & Geoeconomy (“HERMES” I.I.A.S.GE) is an independent, non – governmental, non – profit organization, consisting of scholars dedicated in the research and analysis of international affairs in regional and global level. The Institute aims at providing objective, scientific, and reliable research analysis through a variety of studies contributing effectively and constructively in the public dialogue and the evolution of scientific knowledge. Copyright © 2019 “HERMES” Institute for Foreign Affairs, Security & Geoeconomy All rights reserved ISSN: 2654-0304 1 compromises.
    [Show full text]