Interconversion Between Active and Inactive TATA-Binding Protein
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1446–1459 Nucleic Acids Research, 2012, Vol. 40, No. 4 Published online 19 October 2011 doi:10.1093/nar/gkr802 Interconversion between active and inactive TATA-binding protein transcription complexes in the mouse genome Mohamed-Amin Choukrallah, Dominique Kobi1, Igor Martianov1, W. W. M. Pim Pijnappel2,4, Nikolai Mischerikow2,3, Tao Ye1, Albert J. R. Heck3,4,5, H. Th. Marc Timmers2,4 and Irwin Davidson1,* 1Institut de Ge´ ne´ tique et de Biologie Mole´ culaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/ULP, 1 Rue Laurent Fries, 67404 Illkirch Ce´ dex, France, 2Molecular Cancer Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, 4Netherlands Proteomics Centre and 5Centre for Biomedical Genetics, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands Received June 10, 2011; Revised September 12, 2011; Accepted September 13, 2011 ABSTRACT preinitiation complex comprising B-TFIID that primes the promoter for productive preinitiation The TATA binding protein (TBP) plays a pivotal role complex formation in mammalian cells. in RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription through incorporation into the TFIID and B-TFIID complexes. The role of mammalian B-TFIID composed of TBP INTRODUCTION and B-TAF1 is poorly understood. Using a com- Accurate initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase plementation system in genetically modified mouse II (Pol II) requires the assembly of the multiprotein cells where endogenous TBP can be condi- preinitiation complex (PIC) on the core promoter around tionally inactivated and replaced by exogenous the mRNA start site (1–3). Amongst the basal transcrip- mutant TBP coupled to tandem affinity purification tion factors in this process is the TFIID complex com- and mass spectrometry, we identify two TBP prising the TATA binding protein (TBP) and a set of 13–14 TBP-associated factors (TAFs) (4–7). Two add- mutations, R188E and K243E, that disrupt the TBP– itional TBP-containing complexes involved in Pol II tran- BTAF1 interaction and B-TFIID complex formation. scription have been described, the B-TFIID complex, Transcriptome and ChIP-seq analyses show that where TBP is associated with BTAF1 and TAC, a loss of B-TFIID does not generally alter gene ex- complex found in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells, pression or genomic distribution of TBP, but posi- where TBP is associated with an unprocessed form of tively or negatively affects TBP and/or Pol II basal transcription factor TFIIA (8). BTAF1 and its recruitment to a subset of promoters. We identify yeast orthologue Mot1p belong to the SNF2 superfamily promoters where wild-type TBP assembles a of ATPases and they can dissociate TBP from DNA in an partial inactive preinitiation complex comprising ATP-dependent manner (9–12). While it was first proposed B-TFIID, TFIIB and Mediator complex, but lacking that Mot1p may be a transcriptional repressor, genome- TFIID, TFIIE and Pol II. Exchange of B-TFIID in wide studies show that it is associated with active pro- moters where it may use ATP hydrolysis to promote a wild-type cells for TFIID in R188E and K243E dynamic equilibrium of promoter occupancy between a mutant cells at these primed promoters completes transcriptionally inactive Mot1p–TBP–NC2 complex and preinitiation complex formation and recruits Pol II to an active TFIID complex (13–15). activate their expression. We propose a novel regu- The highly conserved TBP C-terminal core domain latory mechanism involving formation of a partial binds DNA and interacts with basal transcription *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33 3 88 65 34 40 (45); Fax: +33 3 88 65 32 01; Email: [email protected] Present address: Mohamed-Amin Choukrallah, Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Maulbeerstrasse 66, 4058 Basel, Switzerland The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors. ß The Author(s) 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nucleic Acids Research, 2012, Vol. 40, No. 4 1447 factors and a host of other regulatory proteins (16). The and TBP expression verified by immunoblot. Cell prolif- structure of TBP bound to TATA-containing DNA, as eration analysis, Affymetrix microarrays, qPCR and well as with the basal transcription factors TFIIA, immunoblot were all performed by standard methods TFIIB, NC2, BRF and the N-terminal domain of TAF1 as previously described (28). TBP was detected using have all been described (17–21). Surfaces involved in these the 3G3 antibody that recognizes an epitope at the interactions have been mutated as part of a systematic extreme N-terminus shared between mouse and human mutagenesis of all solvent-exposed residues (22–25). The TBP (29). properties of the mutant TBPs have been evaluated in vitro with respect to transcription using various Pol II and Pol III promoters, binding to DNA, interaction with co- Chromatin immunoprecipitation -sequencing factors and the ability to form higher-order DNA Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and ChIP-seq ex- complexes in vitro with its partners, and their ability to periments were performed according to standard proto- support activated transcription in transfected mammalian cells (22,26). cols as previously described (30,31). Briefly, ChIP-seq While previous studies provided considerable insight was performed using an Illumina GAIIx sequencer and into the structure–function relationships of TBP in mam- the raw data analysed by the Illumina Eland pipeline malian cells, their scope has been limited to in vitro assays V1.6. Peak detection was performed using the MACS or transfections with artificial promoters that may not re- software (http://liulab.dfci.harvard.edu/MACS/) (32) produce the complexity of the in vivo situation with the under settings where the GFP ChIP was used as a diversity of promoters in mammalian cells. We have de- negative control. Peaks were then annotated using veloped a unique approach to study TBP function in vivo GPAT [(33), http://bips.u-strasbg.fr/GPAT/Gpat_home using mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) where one .html] using a window of Æ10 kb with respect to the co- allele of the TBP gene has been inactivated and the ordinates of the beginning and end of RefSeq transcripts. other has been floxed such that endogenous TBP can be Global clustering analysis and quantitative comparisons inactivated by Cre-recombinase. We have performed com- were performed using seqMINER [(34) (http://bips.u- plementation assays showing that TBP mutations affect- strasbg.fr/seqminer/]. Further details are provided in the ing critical interactions in vitro can complement loss of Supplementary Data. ChIP was performed with the fol- endogenous TBP, but lead to impaired cell proliferation. lowing antibodies; TBP (Abcam, AB28175), Pol II, We identify TBP mutations which disrupt the TBP– MED6, XPB, TFIIB (Santa Cruz SC-9001, SC-9434, BTAF1 interaction and show that loss of B-TFIID C18-CS225, respectively), H3K4me3 (Upstate 07-473). complex formation does not affect the global genomic dis- The TAF1 antibody was a kind gift from Dr. L. Tora. tribution of TBP, but positively or negatively affects PIC formation and Pol II recruitment at a selected set of promoters. Proteomics analysis MEF cell nuclear extracts were prepared as previously MATERIALS AND METHODS described and subjected to tandem Flag-HA affinity immunopurification using Flag M2 beads, epitope peptide lox/À Isolation of the Tbp MEFs elution followed by reprecipitation with HA-beads as pre- Mouse ES cells with a null allele of TBP (27) were re- viously described (35). The precipitated proteins were targeted with a second vector to introduce LoxP sites digested with trypsin, and the tryptic peptides separated around exon III of the Tbp gene. These ES cells were by tandem strong cation exchange. Peptides were then used to generate mice with the corresponding genotype. analysed by nanoflow-LC coupled to an LTQ-FTICR MEFs were derived from E10.5 embryos by standard pro- mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Spectra cedures and immortalized using large T antigen from were processed with Bioworks (version 3.1, Thermo SV40. Fisher Scientific) and the subsequent data analysis was carried out using Mascot (version 2.2.1, Matrix Science). Generation and characterization of cells expressing Mascot results files were filtered to contain only pep- mutant TBPs tides above a Mascot ion score of 15 using in-house Tbplox/À MEFs were first infected with pBABE retro- written software. Scaffold (version 2.01.02, Proteome viruses expressing WT or mutant N-terminal Flag-HA Software) was used to validate protein identifications. tagged TBP. After puromycin selection, cell extracts Protein identifications were accepted if they could be es- were prepared and expression of the exogenous TBP tablished at >99.9% probability and contained at least verified by immunoblot. Cells were reinfected with a two identified peptides. Human TBP and its variants second retrovirus vector expressing the tamoxifen indu- were identified following essentially the same procedure, cible Cre-ERT2. After blasticidine selection, cells were but using