DOCSLIB.ORG

H. R. 3684 [Report No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
H. R. 3684 [Report No IB Union Calendar No. 49 117TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION H. R. 3684 [Report No. 117–70] To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JUNE 4, 2021 Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. PAYNE) introduced the fol- lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure JUNE 22, 2021 Additional sponsors: Mr. GARAMENDI, Ms. WILSON of Florida, and Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia JUNE 22, 2021 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 4, 2021] VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:05 Jun 23, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6652 E:\BILLS\H3684.RH H3684 kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS 2 A BILL To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. •HR 3684 RH VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:05 Jun 23, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6652 E:\BILLS\H3684.RH H3684 kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS 3 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investing in a New Vi- 5 sion for the Environment and Surface Transportation in 6 America Act’’ or the ‘‘INVEST in America Act’’. 7 SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS. 8 The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title. Sec. 2. Table of contents. Sec. 3. References. DIVISION A—FEDERAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022 Sec. 101. Definitions. Sec. 102. Extension of Federal Surface Transportation programs. Sec. 103. Additional amounts for the Federal-aid highway program and member designated projects. Sec. 104. Federal Transit Administration. Sec. 105. National highway traffic safety administration. Sec. 106. Federal motor carrier safety administration. Sec. 107. Member designated project authorizations. DIVISION B—SURFACE TRANSPORTATION Sec. 1001. Applicability of division. TITLE I—FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS Subtitle A—Authorizations and Program Conditions Sec. 1101. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 1102. Obligation limitation. Sec. 1103. Definitions and declaration of policy. Sec. 1104. Apportionment. Sec. 1105. Additional deposits into Highway Trust Fund. Sec. 1106. Transparency. Sec. 1107. Complete and context sensitive street design. Sec. 1108. Innovative project delivery Federal share. Sec. 1109. Transferability of Federal-aid highway funds. Sec. 1110. Tolling. Sec. 1111. HOV facilities. Sec. 1112. Buy America. Sec. 1113. Federal-aid highway project requirements. Sec. 1114. State assumption of responsibility for categorical exclusions. Sec. 1115. Surface transportation project delivery program written agreements. •HR 3684 RH VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:05 Jun 23, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6213 E:\BILLS\H3684.RH H3684 kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS 4 Sec. 1116. Corrosion prevention for bridges. Sec. 1117. Sense of Congress. Sec. 1118. Accommodation of certain facilities in right-of-way. Sec. 1119. Federal grants for pedestrian and bike safety improvements. Subtitle B—Programmatic Infrastructure Investment Sec. 1201. National highway performance program. Sec. 1202. Increasing the resilience of transportation assets. Sec. 1203. Emergency relief. Sec. 1204. Railway crossings. Sec. 1205. Surface transportation program. Sec. 1206. Transportation alternatives program. Sec. 1207. Bridge investment. Sec. 1208. Construction of ferry boats and ferry terminal facilities. Sec. 1209. Highway safety improvement program. Sec. 1210. Congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program. Sec. 1211. Electric vehicle charging stations. Sec. 1212. National highway freight program. Sec. 1213. Carbon pollution reduction. Sec. 1214. Recreational trails. Sec. 1215. Safe routes to school program. Sec. 1216. Bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways. Sec. 1217. Noise barriers. Sec. 1218. Safe streets for all. Sec. 1219. Youth service and conservation corps. Subtitle C—Project-Level Investments Sec. 1301. Projects of national and regional significance. Sec. 1302. Community transportation investment grant program. Sec. 1303. Clean corridors program. Sec. 1304. Community climate innovation grants. Sec. 1305. Metro performance program. Sec. 1306. Gridlock reduction grant program. Sec. 1307. Rebuild rural bridges program. Sec. 1308. Parking for commercial motor vehicles. Sec. 1309. Active connected transportation grant program. Sec. 1310. Wildlife crossings program. Sec. 1311. Reconnecting neighborhoods program. Sec. 1312. Apprenticeship utilization. Subtitle D—Planning, Performance Management, and Asset Management Sec. 1401. Metropolitan transportation planning. Sec. 1402. Statewide and nonmetropolitan transportation planning. Sec. 1403. National goals and performance management measures. Sec. 1404. Transportation demand data and modeling study. Sec. 1405. Fiscal constraint on long-range transportation plans. Subtitle E—Federal Lands, Tribes, and Territories Sec. 1501. Territorial and Puerto Rico highway program. Sec. 1502. Tribal transportation program. Sec. 1503. Tribal High Priority Projects program. Sec. 1504. Federal lands transportation program. Sec. 1505. Federal lands and Tribal major projects program. •HR 3684 RH VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:05 Jun 23, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6213 E:\BILLS\H3684.RH H3684 kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS 5 Sec. 1506. Office of Tribal Government Affairs. Sec. 1507. Alternative contracting methods. Sec. 1508. Divestiture of federally owned bridges. Sec. 1509. Study on Federal funding available to Indian Tribes. Sec. 1510. GAO study. Sec. 1511. Federal lands access program. Subtitle F—Additional Provisions Sec. 1601. Vision zero. Sec. 1602. Speed limits. Sec. 1603. Dig Once for broadband infrastructure deployment. Sec. 1604. Stormwater best management practices. Sec. 1605. Pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way. Sec. 1606. Highway formula modernization report. Sec. 1607. Consolidation of programs. Sec. 1608. Student outreach report to Congress. Sec. 1609. Task force on developing a 21st century surface transportation work- force. Sec. 1610. On-the-job training and supportive services. Sec. 1611. Appalachian development highway system funding flexibility. Sec. 1612. Transportation education development program. Sec. 1613. Working group on construction resources. Sec. 1614. Numbering system of highway interchanges. Sec. 1615. Toll credits. Sec. 1616. Transportation construction materials procurement. Sec. 1617. Nationwide road safety assessment. Sec. 1618. Climate resilient transportation infrastructure study. Sec. 1619. Natural gas, electric battery, and zero emission vehicles. Sec. 1620. Guidance on evacuation routes. Sec. 1621. High priority corridors on National Highway System. Sec. 1622. Guidance on inundated and submerged roads. Sec. 1623. Dry bulk weight tolerance. Sec. 1624. Highway use tax evasion projects. Sec. 1625. Labor standards. Sec. 1626. Climate resiliency report by GAO. Sec. 1627. Designation of John R. Lewis Voting Rights Highway. Sec. 1628. GAO study on capital needs of public ferries. Sec. 1629. Use of modeling and simulation technology. Sec. 1630. GAO study on per-mile user fee equity. Sec. 1631. GAO review of equity considerations at State DOTs. Sec. 1632. Study on effectiveness of suicide prevention nets and barriers for struc- tures other than bridges. Sec. 1633. Transportation planning activities. Sec. 1634. Better Utilizing Infrastructure for Lasting Development of Veterans Businesses Act. Sec. 1635. Vehicle weight limitations. Sec. 1636. Roadway worker protection working group. Sec. 1637. GAO study on nature-based solutions for coastal highway resilience. Sec. 1638. Prohibition on the use of civil penalties for campaign finance. Sec. 1639. Repeal of pilot program. Sec. 1640. Technical corrections. •HR 3684 RH VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:05 Jun 23, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6213 E:\BILLS\H3684.RH H3684 kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS 6 TITLE II—PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Subtitle A—Federal Transit Administration Sec. 2101. Authorizations. Sec. 2102. Chapter 53 definitions. Sec. 2103. General provisions. Sec. 2104. Miscellaneous provisions. Sec. 2105. Policies and purposes. Sec. 2106. Fiscal years 2022 and 2023 formulas. Sec. 2107. Metropolitan transportation planning. Sec. 2108. Statewide and nonmetropolitan transportation planning. Sec. 2109. Obligation limitation. Sec. 2110. Public transportation emergency relief funds. Sec. 2111. Certification requirements. Sec. 2112. Hold harmless. Sec. 2113. Study on accessibility of public transportation. Subtitle B—Improving Frequency and Ridership Sec. 2201. Multi-jurisdictional bus frequency and ridership competitive grants. Sec. 2202. Incentivizing frequency in the urban formula. Sec. 2203. Mobility innovation. Sec. 2204. Formula grants for rural areas. Sec. 2205. One-stop paratransit program. Subtitle C—Buy America and Other Procurement Reforms Sec. 2301. Buy America. Sec. 2302. Bus procurement streamlining. Sec. 2303. Bus testing facility. Sec. 2304. Repayment requirement. Sec. 2305. Definition of urbanized areas following a major disaster. Sec. 2306. Special rule for certain rolling stock procurements. Sec. 2307. Spare ratio waiver.
Load more

  1398
Copy Link
Recommended publications
  • Railway Employee Records for Colorado Volume Iii
    RAILWAY EMPLOYEE RECORDS FOR COLORADO VOLUME III By Gerald E. Sherard (2005) When Denver’s Union Station opened in 1881, it saw 88 trains a day during its gold-rush peak. When passenger trains were a popular way to travel, Union Station regularly saw sixty to eighty daily arrivals and departures and as many as a million passengers a year. Many freight trains also passed through the area. In the early 1900s, there were 2.25 million railroad workers in America. After World War II the popularity and frequency of train travel began to wane. The first railroad line to be completed in Colorado was in 1871 and was the Denver and Rio Grande Railroad line between Denver and Colorado Springs. A question we often hear is: “My father used to work for the railroad. How can I get information on Him?” Most railroad historical societies have no records on employees. Most employment records are owned today by the surviving railroad companies and the Railroad Retirement Board. For example, most such records for the Union Pacific Railroad are in storage in Hutchinson, Kansas salt mines, off limits to all but the lawyers. The Union Pacific currently declines to help with former employee genealogy requests. However, if you are looking for railroad employee records for early Colorado railroads, you may have some success. The Colorado Railroad Museum Library currently has 11,368 employee personnel records. These Colorado employee records are primarily for the following railroads which are not longer operating. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (AT&SF) Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad employee records of employment are recorded in a bound ledger book (record number 736) and box numbers 766 and 1287 for the years 1883 through 1939 for the joint line from Denver to Pueblo.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk Downs Redevelopment
    SUFFOLK DOWN S REDEVELOPMENT Additional Information Document SEPTEMBER 16, 2019 PREPARED BY SUBMITTED TO IN ASSOCIATION WITH Boston Planning & DLA Piper Development Agency CBT Architects Beals and Thomas, Inc. Stoss Landscape Urbanism PROPONENT ARUP The McClellan Highway AKF Development Company, LLC SourceOne c/o The HYM Investment Group, LLC Vertex Haley & Aldrich Boston, MA 02114 Additional Information Document Suffolk Downs Redevelopment Boston, Massachusetts SUBMITTED TO Boston Redevelopment Authority, d/b/a Boston Planning and Development Agency One City Hall Square, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02201 PROPONENT The McClellan Highway Development Company, LLC c/o The HYM Investment Group, LLC One Congress Street, 11th floor Boston, MA 02114 PREPARED BY VHB 99 High Street, 10th Floor Boston, MA 02110 In association with: DLA Piper ARUP CBT Architects SourceOne Beals and Thomas, Inc. Vertex Stoss Landscape Urbanism Haley & Aldrich AKF September 16, 2019 Suffolk Downs Redevelopment Additional Information Document Table of Contents Additional Information Document 1.1 Summary of BPDA Review Process .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Master Plan Project Refinements Since Previous Filings ..................................................................... 2 1.3 PDA Master Plan Document Structure ....................................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Proposed Development Framework ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront
    RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DEP Bulletin, 07/25/01
    TABLE OF CONTENTS July 25, 2001 Volume 25 Issue 14 Application Codes and Permit Descriptions Pg. 2 General Application Milestone Codes Specific Decision Application Codes Permit Descriptions General Information Pg. 3 DEP Public Notices, Hearings and Events of Interest (Water Quality Pg. 8-13) Pg.4 - 13 Administrative Hearings and Appeals None at this time Environmental Impact Statement and Assessments (EIS and EA) Pg. 14 Permit Applications Filed or Acted Upon: Land Use Regulation Program CAFRA Permit Application Pg. 15 Freshwater Wetlands General Permit Pg. 17 Freshwater Wetlands Individual Permit Pg. 20 Freshwater Wetlands Letter of Interpretation Pg. 20 Freshwater Wetlands Transition Waiver Pg. 24 Stream Encroachment Pg. 26 Waterfront Development Pg. 29 Waterfront Development General Permit Pg. 32 Division of Water Quality Treatment Works Approval (TWA) Pg. 34 DEP Permit Liaisons and Other Governmental Contacts Inside Back Cover Acting Governor Donald T. DiFrancesco, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Robert C. Shinn, Jr., Commissioner General Application Milestone Codes Application Approved F = Complete for Filing M = Permit Modification Application Denied H = Public Hearing Date P = Permit Decision Date Application Withdrawal I = Additional Information Requested R = Complete for Review C = Cancelled L = Legal Appeal of Permit Decision T = Additional Information Received Specific Decision Application Codes AVE PLAN = Averaging Plan PA/SOW = Presence/Absence/State Open Waters Only FP/A = Footprint/Absence of Wet., Waters & Transition Area PA/T = Presence/Absence/Transition Area Only F/F = Farming/Forestry/Silviculture Exemption R = Reductions FP/P = Footprint/Wetlands Present REG = HMDC/Pinelands Exemption FP/SOW = Footprint/State Open Waters Present Only SPEC ACTIVITY = Special Activity (Linear Dev.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Depot Tower Interlocking Plant
    Union Depot Tower Union Depot Tower (U.D. Tower) was completed in 1914 as part of a municipal project to improve rail transportation through Joliet, which included track elevation of all four railroad lines that went through downtown Joliet and the construction of a new passenger station to consolidate the four existing passenger stations into one. A result of this overall project was the above-grade intersection of 4 north-south lines with 4 east-west lines. The crossing of these rail lines required sixteen track diamonds. A diamond is a fixed intersection between two tracks. The purpose of UD Tower was to ensure and coordinate the safe and timely movement of trains through this critical intersection of east-west and north-south rail travel. UD Tower housed the mechanisms for controlling the various rail switches at the intersection, also known as an interlocking plant. Interlocking Plant Interlocking plants consisted of the signaling appliances and tracks at the intersections of major rail lines that required a method of control to prevent collisions and provide for the efficient movement of trains. Most interlocking plants had elevated structures that housed mechanisms for controlling the various rail switches at the intersection. Union Depot Tower is such an elevated structure. Source: Museum of the American Railroad Frisco Texas CSX Train 1513 moves east through the interlocking. July 25, 1997. Photo courtesy of Tim Frey Ownership of Union Depot Tower Upon the completion of Union Depot Tower in 1914, U.D. Tower was owned and operated by the four rail companies with lines that came through downtown Joliet.
    [Show full text]
  • TO: Interested Parties FROM: Tom Ennis SUBJECT: 18 Neptune Road MOA with Massachusetts Historical Commission DATE: April 29
    TO: Interested Parties FROM: Tom Ennis SUBJECT: 18 Neptune Road MOA with Massachusetts Historical Commission DATE: April 29, 2008 Massport requests the opportunity to consult with the Massachuselts Historical Commission ("MHC") and, following an appropriate consultation process, to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement ("MOW) with the MHC with respect to 18 Neptune Road. To facilitate further public comment. Massport has submitted the draft MOA for publication in the Environmental Monitor on April 23,2008. The Environmental Monitor notice will provide for a 20 day public review and comment period ending on May 13,2008. All comments are to be sent to my attention. Thomas W. Ennis Senior Project Manager1 Senior Planner Massport One Harborside Drive East Boston, MA 02128 tennis@,mass~ort.com 617.568.3546 (direct) 617.568.31 15 (fax) At the conclusion of the public comment period, Massport will respond to all comments received and distribute the comments and Massport's response to comments to MHC, Boston Landmarks Commission. and all commenters. DRAFT 2.14.2008 Memorandum of Agreement between the Massachusetts Port Authority and the Massachusetts Historical Commission Regarding 18 Neptune Road East Boston, Massachusetts WHEREAS, the Massachusetts His~oricalCommission (MHC) has determined that the proposed project of the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) to improve safety at Logan by demolishing 18 Neptune Road, a 3-decker house, in East Boston, Massachusetts will have an adverse effect upon 18 Neptune Road pursuant to 950 CMR 71.05(a), a property that meet the criteria ofeligibility for listing in ihe National Register of Historic Places undcr Criteria A, B, and C at the local, state.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR train time schedule & line map CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR Chicago Union Station View In Website Mode Amtrak The CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR train line (Chicago Union Station Amtrak) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Chicago Union Station Amtrak: 11:10 AM (2) Emeryville Amtrak: 2:00 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR train arriving. Direction: Chicago Union Station Amtrak CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR train Time Schedule 35 stops Chicago Union Station Amtrak Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 11:10 AM Monday 11:10 AM Emeryville Amtrak 5885 Horton St, Emeryville Tuesday 11:10 AM Richmond Transit Station Amtrak Wednesday 11:10 AM 1534 Nevin Plz, Richmond Thursday 11:10 AM Martinez Amtrak Friday 11:10 AM 601 Marina Vista Ave, Martinez Saturday 11:10 AM Davis Amtrak 840 Second Street, Davis Sacramento Amtrak 401 I Street, Sacramento CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR train Info Direction: Chicago Union Station Amtrak Roseville Amtrak Stops: 35 201 Paciƒc St, Roseville Trip Duration: 3100 min Line Summary: Emeryville Amtrak, Richmond Transit Colfax Amtrak Station Amtrak, Martinez Amtrak, Davis Amtrak, 99 Railroad Ave, Colfax Sacramento Amtrak, Roseville Amtrak, Colfax Amtrak, Truckee Amtrak, Reno Amtrak, Winnemucca Truckee Amtrak Amtrak, Elko Amtrak, Salt Lake City Amtrak, Provo 10065 Donner Pass Road, Truckee Amtrak, Helper Amtrak, Green River Amtrak, Grand Junction Amtrak, Glenwood Springs Amtrak, Granby Reno Amtrak Amtrak, Fraser-Winter
    [Show full text]
  • Art Camps & Classes
    IMPORTANT NOTES JOSLYN ART SCHOOL ART CLASSES Joslyn Members: $200; General Public: $230 Registration & Refunds (Payment plans available.) AGES 3-5 (with an adult) TEENS & ADULTS Advance registration and full payment is required for all classes except Art Adventures. Instructors: To be determined Art Adventures Drawing & Painting: Glazing in Layers Classes are subject to minimum and maximum enrollment, so please register early. Register Fridays: June 1-August 17; 10:30-11:30 am Watercolor @ Lauritzen Gardens online at www.joslyn.org or call (402) 661-3839. Joslyn’s refund policy is as follows: 50% Weeks of September 10-December 3, 2012, Sundays, June 3, 10, 17, 24; 1-3:30 pm Drop by with your preschooler to see artworks in the galleries Joslyn Members: $70; General Public: $80 Mondays: July 9, 16, 23, 30; 6-8 pm refund for cancellations made up to two weeks prior to the class start date; no refunds for continuing January 7-April 1, 2013 and to do a simple art-making activity. It’s a great way for Create several small paintings as you learn to combine drawing Joslyn & Lauritzen Members: $56; General Public: $64 cancellations made less than two weeks before a class begins. Materials are provided. This 24-week visual arts program introduces students to Joslyn’s collections and young artists to have their first Museum experiences before and painting techniques. Students will use water-soluble Explore Lauritzen’s many beautiful gardens while learning exhibitions with sequential art instruction in six media – drawing, painting, coming to art classes on their own. Student Art Display pencils on gesso to create value and mass before applying basic watercolor techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Omaha Awareness Tours: the En Ar South Side Center for Public Affairs Research (CPAR) University of Nebraska at Omaha
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Publications Archives, 1963-2000 Center for Public Affairs Research 1979 Omaha Awareness Tours: The eN ar South Side Center for Public Affairs Research (CPAR) University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cparpubarchives Part of the Demography, Population, and Ecology Commons, and the Public Affairs Commons Recommended Citation (CPAR), Center for Public Affairs Research, "Omaha Awareness Tours: The eN ar South Side" (1979). Publications Archives, 1963-2000. 107. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cparpubarchives/107 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Public Affairs Research at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications Archives, 1963-2000 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 The Near south Side Tour 1 JACKSON I -- r;;;;f BEGIN ~ JONES - v \\\ ~ LEAVENWORTH ~ ~ •2 I j MARCY -=" ::::;._ ~ n MASON :.......!.. ~'~ ~ ~ ~ So o~o.35o ;~ PACIFIC 36e Be •7 .. J ... 9• ... 37° aB as• •40 1 •10 ~ 12o oll PIERCE ...,n. ~ 13• END •72~ 42° n 43• ®"'i~ 68 .. ~ @ 34• ~~ ~ ~ ,. ~ - ..85 + 6656 :J ® •16 ~D. • + 32• :"·:. ~ WILLIAM .:! 58 57155 31° 17• 59 30• 19o Wolllworth Ave lt18 "~ 54 :J 20• ~hiogton •S1 • PINE " 29° ® .. It®~ v,t "E " M 4~ •44 "'\: \ J 28o 22o HICKORY )' 27• •23 Wau1u1 .. It ~ ,. ,;; \ J CENTER -5 ,;; ~ ~ ,;; ,;; vi vi ~ ,;; '"" -5 -5 -5 ·S -5 -5 C•w; il® \ ~ N g ~ ~ ~ .. ~ " J •47 DORCAS 26o 4~ J 25• - MARTHA @ ,----- ~ ~ ~ I ~ ,. ~ CASTELAR @ I I •I ARBOR I :J "@ VINTON •£1- - - - ;:I 4 .
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Part 2 – Union Station
    NW Corridor Transit Planning Project Part 2 – Union Station Planning Final Report Capitol Region Council of Governments April, 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation (including its participating agencies) and the Connecticut Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the Capitol Region Council of Governments and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Connecticut Department of Transportation and/or the U.S. Department of Transportation. Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Future Scenarios and Alternatives ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Recommended Alternatives...................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Next Steps ................................................................................................................................................ 1-3 2.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Goals and Objectives
    [Show full text]
  • Payne & for Rent
    2--0 1L1E OMAHA kl NDAY BEL; Kb.BlUAliY 122, 1914. BUSINESS CHANCES OFFERED FOR KENT. OFFERED FOR RENT. OFFERED FOR RENT. OFFERED FOR RENT. OFFERED FOR It EXT. REAL ESTATE IA7AXS ESTABLISHED Manufacturer wants Apnrtnenln lUtt manager. High clnsa artlcir; should Apnrtmrnta nnd Flnts. Apartment and Flats. nnil Flnts. Houses nnd Cottnors. Stores nnit Ufflvrs. OMAHA homes. East Nebraska forms. pay $10,000 annually; $WU to $1,000 capital; 105-- . you are Farnam St. flats, modern HOUSES AND COTTAGES. 1016 OMAHA NATIONAL. Douglas 2715. will pay .expenses to Chicago If L-B- House MCflpt heat; each, $tt. T CHANCE TO TAICB ADVAN- Ware for Rent . t ere. wa Rlchardson,-Ol- ..n,,. ... 1. , rit -J. It.- man want References. UW-- m Ho. 16th flats, TAGE 1,111 unu i ti ill nii", ,i, v Colony Bldg.. Chicago St. modern OF REDUCED RENTS. S. E. twjto except heat; each, MO. Partly Modern. Corner 10th and Farnam uumoni rnrniiiii, miinif. NEW, valuable money earning proposi- 185 Grace St and 2012 No. 18th St, 10 r., 161S aork, very close In; $12,50. Streets. HARRISON & MORTON, 916 Om. Nat tion, cood feller, thousands In use. small THE ANGELUS rooms, modern; eaeh, $S.f. MODERN EXCEPT HJ3AT. Far-na- ( capital required. Call Monday, 1391 W. FARNAM. SMITH & CO., 6'T., 3400 Maple, first-clas- s condition; $15. Building formerly occupied by Allen REAL ESTATE AVANTEp. l'arnam Bt 2640 Chicago St., bargain at $18. Brothers Company, wholesale grocers; C - 4KK $15. stories nnd basement; latxltt foet; 120.00? I1ST your house with Osborno Realty L1VK partner with money to manage, 25th Ave.
    [Show full text]