DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Bird Damage Management EA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 Bird Damage Management EA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MANAGING DAMAGE CAUSED BY BIRDS IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY PREPARED BY: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE WILDLIFE SERVICES IN COOPERATION WITH: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY DECEMBER 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................................. iii CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION 1.1 PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 NEED FOR ACTION ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 SCOPE OF THIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 28 1.4 RELATIONSHIP OF THIS DOCUMENT TO OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS . 31 1.5 AUTHORITY OF FEDERAL AND COMMONWEALTH AGENCIES ..................................... 33 1.6 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND STATUTES ....................................................................... 35 1.7 DECISIONS TO BE MADE ......................................................................................................... 41 CHAPTER 2: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ISSUES 2.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................................................... 42 2.2 ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH BIRD DAMAGE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ................... 45 2.3 ISSUES CONSIDERED BUT NOT IN DETAIL WITH RATIONALE ...................................... 52 CHAPTER 3: ALTERNATIVES 3.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................ 58 3.2 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT NOT ANALYZED IN DETAIL .................................. 64 3.3 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR BIRD DAMAGE MANAGEMENT ............ 68 3.4 ADDITIONAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SPECIFIC TO THE ISSUES ...... 69 CHAPTER 4: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES FOR ISSUES ANALYZED IN DETAIL .................. 72 4.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION BY ISSUE .................................. 167 CHAPTER 5: LIST OF PREPARERS AND/OR PERSONS CONSULTED 5.1 LIST OF PREPARERS AND REVIEWERS .............................................................................. 174 5.2 LIST OF PERSONS CONSULTED ............................................................................................ 174 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A: LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................... A-1 APPENDIX B: METHODS AVAILABLE FOR RESOLVING OR PREVENTING BIRD DAMAGE ........................................................................................................................................ B-1 APPENDIX C: FEDERAL THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES IN KENTUCKY ......... C-1 APPENDIX D: COMMONWEALTH THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES .................... D-1 APPENDIX E: ADDITIONAL TARGET SPECIES THAT WS COULD ADDRESS ........................... E-1 ii ACRONYMS AI Avian Influenza APHIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service AQDO Aquaculture Depredation Order AVMA American Veterinary Medical Association BBS Breeding Bird Survey BCR Bird Conservation Region CBC Christmas Bird Count CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations DNC 4,4'-dinitrocarbanilide EA Environmental Assessment EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FAA Federal Aviation Administration FDA Food and Drug Administration FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act FR Federal Register FY Fiscal Year HDP 4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinal INAD Investigational New Animal Drug KDA Kentucky Department of Agriculture KDFWR Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources KAR Kentucky Administrative Regulations KRS Kentucky Revised Statutes KSNPC Kentucky State Nature Preservation Society LD Median Lethal Dose LC Median Lethal Concentration MANEM Mid Atlantic/New England/Maritime region MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MFGP Mississippi Flyway Giant Population MOU Memorandum of Understanding NASS National Agricultural Statistics Service NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NWRC National Wildlife Research Center PRDO Public Resource Depredation Order SJBP Southern James Bay Population SOP Standard Operating Procedure T&E Threatened and Endangered TVA Tennessee Valley Authority USAF United States Air Force USC United States Code USDA United States Department of Agriculture USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGS United States Geological Survey WS Wildlife Services iii CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION 1.1 PURPOSE The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Wildlife Services (WS)1 program in Kentucky continues to receive requests for assistance or anticipates receiving requests for assistance to alleviate or prevent damage occurring to agricultural resources, natural resources, and property, including threats to human safety, associated with several bird species, including the Snow Goose (Chen caerulescens), Canada Goose (Branta canadensis), Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), feral waterfowl2, Wild Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo), Double-crested Cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus), Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias), Great Egret (Ardea alba), Snowy Egret (Egretta thula), Cattle Egret (Bubulcus ibis), Black-crowned Night-Heron (Nycticorax nycticorax), Black Vulture (Coragyps atratus), Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura), Osprey (Pandion haliaetus), Mississippi Kite (Ictinia mississippiensis), Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Sharp-shinned Hawk (Accipiter striatus), Cooper’s Hawk (Accipiter cooperii), Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), Killdeer (Charadrius vociferous), Ring-billed Gull (Larus delawarensis), Herring Gull (Larus argentatus), Rock Pigeon (Columba livia), Eurasian Collared-Dove (Streptopelia decaocto), Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura), Snowy Owl (Bubo scandiacus), Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor), American Kestrel (Falco sparverius), Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus), American Crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), Cliff Swallow (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota), Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica), American Robin (Turdus migratorius), European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris), Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus), Eastern Meadowlark (Sturnella magna), Common Grackle (Quiscalus quiscula), Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), House Finch (Haemorhous mexicanus), and House Sparrow (Passer domesticus). In addition to those species, WS could also receive requests for assistance to manage damage and threats of damage associated with several other bird species, but requests for assistance associated with those species would occur infrequently and/or requests would involve a small number of individual birds of a species. Damages and threats of damages associated with those species would occur primarily at airports where individuals of those species pose a threat of aircraft strikes. Appendix E contains a list of species that WS could address in low numbers and/or infrequently when those species cause damage or pose a threat of damage. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) also continues to experience damage and threats of damage associated with birds at facilities or properties they own or manage in Kentucky. Therefore, the TVA could request the assistance of WS to manage damage or threats of damage at those facilities and properties. The goal of WS and the TVA would be to conduct a coordinated program to alleviate bird damage on properties that the TVA owns or manages in accordance with plans and objectives developed by both agencies. The plans and objectives would outline the actions of each agency. All federal actions are subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (Public Law 9-190, 42 3 USC 4321 et seq.), including the actions of WS and the TVA. The NEPA sets forth the requirement that 1 The WS program is authorized to protect agriculture and other resources from damage caused by wildlife through the Act of March 2, 1931 (46 Stat. 1468; 7 USC 426-426b) as amended, and the Act of December 22, 1987 (101 Stat. 1329-331, 7 USC 426c). 2 Free-ranging or feral domestic waterfowl refers to captive-reared, domestic, of some domestic genetic stock, or domesticated breeds of ducks, geese, and swans. Examples of domestic waterfowl include, but are not limited to, Mute Swans, Muscovy Ducks, Pekin Ducks, Rouen Ducks, Cayuga Ducks, Swedish Ducks, Chinese Geese, Toulouse Geese, Khaki Campbell Ducks, Embden Geese, and Pilgrim Geese. Feral Ducks may include a combination of Mallards, Muscovy Duck, and Mallard-Muscovy Hybrids. 3 The WS program follows the CEQ regulations implementing the NEPA (40 CFR 1500 et seq.) along with USDA (7 CFR 1b) and APHIS Implementing Guidelines (7 CFR 372) as part of the decision-making process. 1 all federal actions be evaluated in terms of their potential to significantly affect the quality of the human environment for the purpose of avoiding or, where possible, mitigating and minimizing adverse impacts. In part, the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulates federal activities affecting the physical and biological environment through regulations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moths of North Carolina - Early Draft 1
    Geometridae Lytrosis permagnaria No common name 10 9 8 n=0 7 High Mt. 6 N 5 • u 4 3 • • m 2 • b 1 e 0 r 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 • 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 NC counties: 5 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec o 10 f 9 n=2 = Sighting or Collection 8 • 7 Low Mt. High counts of: in NC since 2001 F 6 l 5 1 - Haywood - 2002-06-10 = Not seen since 2001 4 • i 3 1 - Macon - 1999-06-04 g 2 Status Rank h 1 1 - Chatham - 2014-05-21 0 NC US NC Global t 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 D Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec a 10 10 9 9 t 8 n=7 8 n=0 e 7 Pd 7 CP s 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Three periods to each month: 1-10 / 11-20 / 21-31 FAMILY: Geometridae SUBFAMILY: Ennominae TRIBE: Angeronini TAXONOMIC_COMMENTS: This strictly North American genus contains four species, all of which occur in North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometrid Larvae of the Alpi Marittime Natural Park
    Geometrid larvae of the Alpi Marittime Natural Park (district of Valdieri, Cuneo, Italy), with descriptions of the larvae of two Gnophini Pierce, 1914 (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Geometridae) Gareth Edward KING Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28069 Cantoblanco, Madrid (Spain) [email protected] Félix Javier GONZÁLEZ-ESTÉBANEZ Departamento de Biodiversidad y Gestión Ambiental, Universidad de León, 24071 León (Spain) [email protected] Published on 31 December 2015 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:36697C66-C6FF-4FC0-BD97-303C937A0BEF King G. E. & González-Estébanez F. J. 2015. — Geometrid larvae of the Alpi Marittime Natural Park (district of Valdieri, Cuneo, Italy), with descriptions of the larvae of two Gnophini Pierce, 1914 (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Geometridae), in Daugeron C., Deharveng L., Isaia M., Villemant C. & Judson M. (eds), Mercantour/Alpi Marittime All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory. Zoosystema 37 (4): 621-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2015n4a8 KEY WORDS Insecta, ABSTRACT Lepidoptera, Examination of 14 plant families in the Alpi Marittime Alps Natural Park (Valdieri, Italy) resulted in Geometridae, Gnophini, the collection of 103 larvae of 28 geometrid taxa; these belong to three subfamilies, with Ennominae Italy, Duponchel, 1845 being the most representative (13 taxa = 46.4%). Th e fi nal instar (L5) of two taxa Maritime Alps, in the tribe Gnophini Pierce, 1914, Gnophos furvata meridionalis Wehrli, 1924 and Charissa pullata larvae, morphology, ([Denis & Schiff ermüller], 1775) is described, including its chaetotaxy. Biological data and observa- chaetotaxy. tions are provided for all taxa. RÉSUMÉ Les larves de Geometridae collectées dans le Parc naturel des Alpi Marittime (district Valdieri, Cuneo, Italie), MOTS CLÉS Insecta, avec la description des larves de deux espèces de Gnophini Pierce, 1914 (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Geometridae).
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Across the Eastern Continental Divide
    Fisheries Across the Eastern Continental Divide Abstracts for oral presentations and posters, 2010 Spring Meeting of the Southern Division of the American Fisheries Society Asheville, NC 1 Contributed Paper Oral Presentation Potential for trophic competition between introduced spotted bass and native shoal bass in the Flint River Sammons, S.M.*, Auburn University. Largemouth bass, shoal bass, and spotted bass were collected from six sites over four seasons on the Flint River, Georgia to assess food habits. Diets of all three species was very broad; 10 categories of invertebrates and 15 species of fish were identified from diets. Since few large spotted bass were collected, all comparisons among species were conducted only for juvenile fish (< 200 mm) and subadult fish (200-300 mm). Juvenile largemouth bass diets were dominated by fish in all seasons, mainly sunfish. Juvenile largemouth bass rarely ate insects except in spring, when all three species consumed large numbers of insects. In contrast, juvenile shoal bass diets were dominated by insects in all seasons but winter. Juvenile spotted bass diets were more varied- highly piscivorous in the fall and winter and highly insectivorous in spring and summer. Diets of subadult largemouth bass were similar to that of juvenile fish, and heavily dominated by fish, particularly sunfish. Similar to juveniles, diets of subadult shoal bass were much less piscivorous than largemouth bass. Crayfish were important components of subadult shoal bass diets in all seasons but summer. Insects were important components of shoal bass diets in fall and summer. Diets of subadult spotted bass were generally more piscivorous than shoal bass, but less than largemouth bass.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Habitat and Bat Activity on Moth Community Composition and Seasonal Phenology Across Habitat Types
    INFLUENCE OF HABITAT AND BAT ACTIVITY ON MOTH COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND SEASONAL PHENOLOGY ACROSS HABITAT TYPES BY MATTHEW SAFFORD THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Advisor: Assistant Professor Alexandra Harmon-Threatt, Chair and Director of Research ABSTRACT Understanding the factors that influence moth diversity and abundance is important for monitoring moth biodiversity and developing conservation strategies. Studies of moth habitat use have primarily focused on access to host plants used by specific moth species. How vegetation structure influences moth communities within and between habitats and mediates the activity of insectivorous bats is understudied. Previous research into the impact of bat activity on moths has primarily focused on interactions in a single habitat type or a single moth species of interest, leaving a large knowledge gap on how habitat structure and bat activity influence the composition of moth communities across habitat types. I conducted monthly surveys at sites in two habitat types, restoration prairie and forest. Moths were collected using black light bucket traps and identified to species. Bat echolocation calls were recorded using ultrasonic detectors and classified into phonic groups to understand how moth community responds to the presence of these predators. Plant diversity and habitat structure variables, including tree diameter at breast height, ground cover, and vegetation height were measured during summer surveys to document how differences in habitat structure between and within habitats influences moth diversity. I found that moth communities vary significantly between habitat types.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened and Endangered Species List
    Effective April 15, 2009 - List is subject to revision For a complete list of Tennessee's Rare and Endangered Species, visit the Natural Areas website at http://tennessee.gov/environment/na/ Aquatic and Semi-aquatic Plants and Aquatic Animals with Protected Status State Federal Type Class Order Scientific Name Common Name Status Status Habit Amphibian Amphibia Anura Gyrinophilus gulolineatus Berry Cave Salamander T Amphibian Amphibia Anura Gyrinophilus palleucus Tennessee Cave Salamander T Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus bouchardi Big South Fork Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus cymatilis A Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus deweesae Valley Flame Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus extraneus Chickamauga Crayfish T Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus obeyensis Obey Crayfish T Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus pristinus A Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus williami "Brawley's Fork Crayfish" E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Fallicambarus hortoni Hatchie Burrowing Crayfish E Crustacean Malocostraca Decapoda Orconectes incomptus Tennessee Cave Crayfish E Crustacean Malocostraca Decapoda Orconectes shoupi Nashville Crayfish E LE Crustacean Malocostraca Decapoda Orconectes wrighti A Crayfish E Fern and Fern Ally Filicopsida Polypodiales Dryopteris carthusiana Spinulose Shield Fern T Bogs Fern and Fern Ally Filicopsida Polypodiales Dryopteris cristata Crested Shield-Fern T FACW, OBL, Bogs Fern and Fern Ally Filicopsida Polypodiales Trichomanes boschianum
    [Show full text]
  • Kyfishid[1].Pdf
    Kentucky Fishes Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources Kentucky Fish & Wildlife’s Mission To conserve, protect and enhance Kentucky’s fish and wildlife resources and provide outstanding opportunities for hunting, fishing, trapping, boating, shooting sports, wildlife viewing, and related activities. Federal Aid Project funded by your purchase of fishing equipment and motor boat fuels Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources #1 Sportsman’s Lane, Frankfort, KY 40601 1-800-858-1549 • fw.ky.gov Kentucky Fish & Wildlife’s Mission Kentucky Fishes by Matthew R. Thomas Fisheries Program Coordinator 2011 (Third edition, 2021) Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources Division of Fisheries Cover paintings by Rick Hill • Publication design by Adrienne Yancy Preface entucky is home to a total of 245 native fish species with an additional 24 that have been introduced either intentionally (i.e., for sport) or accidentally. Within Kthe United States, Kentucky’s native freshwater fish diversity is exceeded only by Alabama and Tennessee. This high diversity of native fishes corresponds to an abun- dance of water bodies and wide variety of aquatic habitats across the state – from swift upland streams to large sluggish rivers, oxbow lakes, and wetlands. Approximately 25 species are most frequently caught by anglers either for sport or food. Many of these species occur in streams and rivers statewide, while several are routinely stocked in public and private water bodies across the state, especially ponds and reservoirs. The largest proportion of Kentucky’s fish fauna (80%) includes darters, minnows, suckers, madtoms, smaller sunfishes, and other groups (e.g., lam- preys) that are rarely seen by most people.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of North America
    Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Etheostoma Maydeni) Species Status Assessment
    Redlips Darter (Etheostoma maydeni) Species Status Assessment Version 1.1 Photo courtesy of Dr. David Neely, Tennessee Aquarium Conservation Institute (East Fork Obey River, Fentress County, Tennessee, December 2017) U.S Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia May 2018 Redlips Darter SSA This document was prepared by Dr. Michael A. Floyd, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Kentucky Ecological Services Field Office, Frankfort, Kentucky. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service greatly appreciates the assistance of Tom Barbour (Kentucky Division of Mine Permits), Darrell Bernd (Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA)), Davy Black (Eastern Kentucky University), Stephanie Brandt (Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFWR)), Bart Carter (TWRA), Stephanie Chance (USFWS – Tennessee Ecological Services Field Office (TFO)), Brian Evans (USFWS – Atlanta), Mike Compton (Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission (KSNPC)), Dr. Bernie Kuhajda (Tennessee Aquarium Conservation Institute (TNACI), Pam Martin (U.S. Forest Service - Daniel Boone National Forest (DBNF)), Matt Moran (U.S. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement), Dr. Dave Neely (TNACI), Dr. Steve Powers (Roanoke College), Pat Rakes (Conservation Fisheries, Inc. (CFI)), Rebecca Schapansky (National Park Service – Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area), J.R. Shute (CFI), Jeff Simmons (Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)), Justin Spaulding (TWRA), Kurt Snider (USFWS – TFO), Dr. Matthew Thomas (KDFWR), Keith Wethington (KDFWR), David Withers (Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC)), and Brian Zimmerman (The Ohio State University), who provided helpful information and/or review of the draft document. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Redlips Darter (Etheostoma maydeni) Species Status Assessment, Version 1.1. May 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Outdoor Recreation Plan 2020-2025
    Kentucky Outdoor Recreation Plan 2020-2025 October 2019 Department for Local Government Federal Grants Division 1 Outdoor Recreation in Kentucky Assessment, Policies and Actions 2020-2025 Matt Bevin, Governor Commonwealth of Kentucky Sandy Dunahoo, Commissioner Office of the Governor Department for Local Government The Office of the Governor, Department for Local Government prohibits discrimination on the basis of age, sex, race, color, creed, religion, national origin or disability in its programs and activities. Anyone who believes he or she has been discriminated against for any of these reasons may file a complaint alleging discrimination with either the Department for Local Government or the Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240 The preparation of this plan was financed in part by a planning grant under the provisions of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578) from the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 2 Commonwealth of Kentucky OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR Matthew G. Bevin 700 Capitol Avenue Governor Suite 100 Frankfort, KY 40601 (502) 564-2611 Fax: (502) 564-2517 September 26, 2019 Mr. Robert Vogel, Regional Director National Park Service 1849 C Street, Northwest Washington, DC 20240 Dear Mr. Vogel: It is my pleasure to present the 2020 Kentucky Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP). The Kentucky Department for Local Government prepared this five-year plan with extensive input from its fifteen area development districts, several federal, state and local government agencies, and community recreational-user groups. The 2020 SCORP outlines strategies and recommendations for addressing outdoor recreation to promote healthy lifestyles, boost outdoor recreational activities and tourism in our communities.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Years of Change in the Flora of the Carolinas
    ASTERACEAE 224 Zinnia Linnaeus 1759 (Zinnia) A genus of about 17 species, herbs, of sw. North America south to South America. References: Smith in FNA (2006c); Cronquist (1980)=SE. 1 Achenes wingless; receptacular bracts (chaff) toothed or erose on the lip..............................................................Z. peruviana 1 Achenes winged; receptacular bracts (chaff) with a differentiated fimbriate lip........................................................Z. violacea * Zinnia peruviana (Linnaeus) Linnaeus, Zinnia. Cp (GA, NC, SC): disturbed areas; rare (commonly cultivated), introduced from the New World tropics. May-November. [= FNA, K, SE; ? Z. pauciflora Linnaeus – S] * Zinnia violacea Cavanilles, Garden Zinnia. Cp (GA, NC, SC): disturbed areas; rare (commonly cultivated), introduced from the New World tropics. May-November. [= FNA, K; ? Z. elegans Jacquin – S, SE] BALSAMINACEAE A. Richard 1822 (Touch-me-not Family) A family of 2 genera and 850-1000 species, primarily of the Old World tropics. References: Fischer in Kubitzki (2004). Impatiens Linnaeus (Jewelweed, Touch-me-not, Snapweed, Balsam) A genus of 850-1000 species, herbs and subshrubs, primarily tropical and north temperate Old World. References: Fischer in Kubitzki (2004). 1 Corolla purple, pink, or white; plants 3-6 (-8) dm tall; stems puberulent or glabrous; [cultivated alien, rarely escaped]. 2 Sepal spur strongly recurved; stems puberulent..............................................................................................I. balsamina 2 Sepal spur slightly
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Presentations
    Organizing Societies American Elasmobranch Society 33rd Annual Meeting President: Dean Grubbs Treasurer: Cathy Walsh Secretary: Jennifer Wyffels Editor and Webmaster: David Shiffman Immediate Past President: Chris Lowe American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists 97th Annual Meeting President: Carole Baldwin President Elect: Brian Crother Past President: Maureen A. Donnelly Prior Past President: Larry G. Allen Treasurer: F. Douglas Martin Secretary: Prosanta Chakrabarty Editor: Christopher Beachy Herpetologists’ League 75th Annual Meeting President: David M. Green Immediate Past President: James Spotila Vice-President: David Sever Treasurer: Laurie Mauger Secretary: Renata Platenburg Publications Secretary: Ken Cabarle Communications Secretary: Wendy Palin Herpetologica Editor: Stephen Mullin Herpetological Monographs Editor: Michael Harvey Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles 60th Annual Meeting President: Richard Shine President-Elect: Marty Crump Immediate Past-President: Aaron Bauer Secretary: Marion R. Preest Treasurer: Kim Lovich Publications Secretary: Cari-Ann Hickerson Thank you to our generous sponsor We would like to thank the following: Local Hosts David Hillis, University of Texas at Austin, LHC Chair Dean Hendrickson, University of Texas at Austin Becca Tarvin, University of Texas at Austin Anne Chambers, University of Texas at Austin Christopher Peterson, University of Texas at Austin Volunteers We wish to thank the following volunteers who have helped make the Joint Meeting of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
    [Show full text]