<<

3 Radiolarians, Radiolarites, and Mesozoic Paleogeography of the Circum-Mediterranean Alpine Belts

Patrick De Wever

Overview pearance of all the radiolarites in the Uppermost may be attributed to a drastic change in cir­ Radiolarites are of great importance as bathymetric culation from gyres producing in the indicators for paleogeographic reconstructions and Tethyan basin, to latitudinal, east-to-west circula­ geodynamic models. Only recently have we been tion through Central America which broke down the able to date radiolarites and many age dates are scat­ upwelling regime in much of the tethyan area. tered through the specialized geologic literature. The inventory ofavailable data from the Mesozoic of the circum-Mediterranean Alpine fold belts reveals Introduction two general periods of 'radiolarite , both associated with sedimentary and ophiolitic Radiolarites (rhythmically centimeter-bedded sequences: one period occurred during alternating with millimeter-bedded shale) are of and/or Liassic time, the other during Dogger and/or great importance for paleogeographic reconstruc­ MaIm time. The Triassic-Liassic sections are alloch­ tions and geodynamic models because of their bath­ tonous. Radiolarites associated with extrusive rocks ymetric significance and their frequent association are considered to be the sedimentary cover of an with . They are a very good marker for the , either of an open ocean, back-arc study of margin formation, subsidence, and evolu­ basin or small ocean basin. Radiolarites intercalated tion and are important for dating the oceanic crust. with other sedimentary rocks belong to nappes with However, direct dating of radiolarite was not pos­ unknown basement rocks, probably of thinned con­ sible until recently, since these sedimentary rocks do tinental crust. Radiolarites deposited during Dogger not bear the commonly used for stratigraphy and MaIm time are of three types and characterize (e.g., foraminifers, nannofossils). Locally they had three environments whose common attribute is a been indirectly dated by reworked microfauna basal diachronism and a synchronous top. Radio­ included in rare beds of microbreccia (i.e., in the larites intercalated with sedimentary sequences Pindos-Olonos zone, Greece- Dercourt et al., 1973; occurred in basins that received deposits since Trias­ Thiebault et aI., 1981; De Wever and Thiebault, sic time (i.e., Lagonegro, Pindos-Olonos zone) or in 1981). Moreover, the petrographic composition of regions newly invaded by water masses (i.e., Austro­ these rocks did not permit use of the usual etching Alpine zone). Detailed local studies suggest deposi­ techniques for extracting fossils. In the 1970s, this tion on faulted blocks of a rifting margin. Although difficulty was overcome by the discovery of Dumi­ the base of radiolarites is not synchronous in differ­ trica (1970). His etching technique has been des­ ent units, it nevertheless starts around the Dogger cribed and improved by several authors (Pessagno and the maximum development was generally dur­ and Newport, 1972; De Wever et aI., 1979a; De ing Oxfordian time. The base of radiolarites asso­ Wever, 1982). Radiolarites of circum-Alpine oro­ ciated with ophiolites is everywhere dated as MaIm genic belts have since been analyzed paleontologi­ but the bases are not exactly synchronous; data are cally (Baumgartner et al., 1980; Baumgartner, 1984; still too few to analyze the details. The sudden disap- Kocher, 1981; Thiebault et aI., 1981; De Wever and 32 Patrick De Wever

6 6 ~ FIGURE 3.1. Synthesis of radiolarites sensu !:: .- c stricto (level 3b of Radiolarite Formation in .5! c c 0' Fleury, 1980) age dates. From left to right: syn­ N C C C c C CD o "~ ~ 0 0 o a ~ "~ c QI thetic lithologic column, radiolarite formation. V "; 'E C ~ c o 0 QI 0 .r; o o E 0 .... .r; 3a: Pelites de Kasteli member; 3b: radiolarite )( "~ 0 0 0 '0 o ~ ..... ~ CD CD u o ~ member (= radiolarites s.s.); 3c: Calcaires aCal­ pionelles member. Age assignments: thick Ir----.-.----\ 3 c horizontal line represents the well-documented age range; thin horizontal line represents the less well documented age range. The narrow age range for each sample is joined to its neighbor (thin line, stippled area); the same is done for wide age ranges (thick line, blank area). a: Age assign­ ments of Dercourt et al. (1973) on the basis of Lucasella cayeuxi (Lucas). Time scale is from Odin and Kennedy (1982). Sedimentation rates (of lithified , equivalent to the sedimen­

tation rate of the silica component-Si02 representing 95-99% of the total rock). Lower part: 35 m120 Ma = 1.7 m/Ma. Middle part: 10 mil8 Ma = 0.5 m/Ma. Upper part: 18 m/8 Ma = 2.2 m/Ma. Average: 65 m/46 Ma = 1.4 m/Ma.

30

Caby, 1981; De Wever and Thiebault, 1981; De blages in a sequence about 60 m thick (Fig. 3.1) Wever, 1982, 1984; De Wever and Origlia-Devos, representing to . Age determi­ 1982a,b; Dumitrica and Mello, 1982; Origilia­ nations in different sections allow calculation of Devos, 1983; Baumgartner, 1984; EI Kadiri, 1984; the average sedimentation rate (for lithified sedi­ De Wever and Miconnet, 1985; De Wever et al., ment) for the entire formation (1.4 m/Ma). The 1985, 1986b; De Wever and Cordey, 1986.) As this lower part ofthe Radiolarite Formation shows a rela­ list of references reveals, age information is recent tively high sedimentation rate of 3 m/Ma; the upper and dispersed throughout the specialized scientific part reveals a lower rate. Therefore, using radiolar­ literature. ians, variation in the sedimentation rate is detect­ able in a sequence. Calculation of sedimentation rates assumes that the sedimentary environment Age-Dating Capabilities with remained closed to the input or release of silica dur­ Radiolarians and Determination ing diagenetic processes. The sedimentation rates determined with radio­ ofSedimentation Rates ofRadiolarite larians for the Pindos-Olonos zone are compatible with rates proposed by other authors for other Mes­ During the 1980s, our knowledge of Mesozoic radi­ ozoic bedded sections: olarian stratigraphy increased a great deal, espe­ cially with respect to low-latitude belts. Radiolarian 2 m/Ma for Franciscan chert (S. Karl, unpublished stratigraphy now permits precise dating ofotherwise data in Hein and Karl, 1983) unfossiliferous siliceous rocks. 4 m/Ma as average for different Tethyan radiolarites As an example, in the Pindos-Olonos zone according to Bernoulli (in Garrision and Fischer, (Greece) (Fig. 3.1), it is possible to record 18 assem- 1969) 3. Radiolarites, Circum-Mediterranean Alpine Belts 33

0.7 to 1.0 m/Ma for East Alpine radiolarite (Garri­ silica, and dissolution of the silica tests), Barrett son and Fischer, 1969) (1981) found it more meaningful to report the 1.0 to 5.3 m/Ma (McBride and Thompson, 1970) for number of events (turbidites) per time unit. If we partially lithified chert ( from ) accept that a bed represents one turbidite, this calcu­ 3 to 9 m/Ma for East Alpine radiolarite (Schlager lation reveals an average of47 events per Ma (thick­ and Schlager, 1973) ness ofthe series is 60 m, average bed thickness is 4 27 to 34 m/Ma for radiolarite in (Iijima et al., cm, duration is 32 Ma) for the Pindos-Olonos series 1978) (Greece) in contrast to the 100 to 400 events cal­ 2.8 m/Ma for bedded cherts from Inuyama region, culated by Barrett for Ligurian cherts of northern Japan (Matsuda et al., 1980) Italy. One cycle in the Greek Radiolarite Formation 3.3 to 6.2 m/Ma for radiolarite in Northern Italy represents around 21,000 years. This cyclicity cor­ (Kocher, 1981) responds well to the period of precession in the 7.5 m/Ma in the Chichibu Chert Formation in Japan Milankovitch theory ofclimate variation (De Wever, (Matsumoto and Iijima, 1983) for the chert beds 1987). Alternatively, it has been proposed that the and 40 m/Ma for the shale partings bedding results from . This is suggested by the observation that diatomites that are massive These rates are approximate, because they were when they are still -A acquired a pronounced not determined with the same chronostratigraphic rhythmic bedding when they underwent diagenesis scale. Different time length variations used for the (transformed in opal-CT) (Pisciotto and Garrison, Jurassic are as follows: Van Hinte (1976), 20 Ma; 1981, pIll). The origin ofthe bedding is not always Odin and Kennedy (1982), 28 Ma; Harland et al. clear, and both primary and diagenetic bedding no (1982), 25 Ma; Kent and Gradstein (1985), 25 Ma; doubt occur. The bedding in the rhythmically bed­ Westermann (1984), 24 Ma. The maximum differ­ ded Mesozoic cherts of are clearly primary ence represents 40 %, and the proposed sedimenta­ (Vescei et al., this volume). One would not expect tion rates have to be considered to be within a 40% the bedding in diatomaceous and radiolarian-rich range. deposits to be the same because of the different More recent (unconsolidated) have high hydrodynamic properties of the two microfossil rates of sedimentation; for example, siliceous sedi­ groups (Hein and Karl, 1983). ments (carbonate-free) found in Antarctic zones show rates of up to 4.8 m/Ma (Brewster, 1980). Some quoted sedimentation rates are up to 40 to 50 Ages of Tethyan Radiolarite m/Ma in the east Pacific and even 90 to 235 m/Ma in diatomaceous sediment from the of Japan The inventory of available data from Tethyan radio­ (Iijima et al., 1982; Matsumoto and Iijima, 1983), larites reveals, in general, two periods of pro­ but these correspond to the bulk sedimentation rate nounced biosiliceous sedimentation, one during (all phases) and not to the sedimentation rate ofonly Triassic and/or Liassic time, the other during Dog­ the silica phase. ger and/or MaIm time (Fig. 3.2). Both time intervals According to studies of the variation of porosity contain radiolarites associated with sedimentary and density in diatomaceous rocks (Isaacs et al., and sequences. I will now present a brief 1983), a compaction of 60% was proposed. lithologic description and ages of the Alpine belts Studying a silicified wood within radiolarite ofthe where radiolarites have been dated. Adoyama Chert Formation (Honshu, Japan), Iijima et al. (this volume) also proposed a compaction of Triassic-Liassic Radiolarite 60 %. If we apply this factor to the radiolarites of the Pindos-Olonos zone, the uncompacted rate Radiolarite Interbedded would range from 3.5 to 7.5 m/Ma (average 6.2 with Sedimentary Rocks m/Ma). This rate is the same as the average rate pro­ Pindos-Olonos Zone, Greece posed for the Adoyama Chert Formation (6 m/Ma; Iijima et al., this volume) and to 7.5 m/Ma proposed In the Pindos-Olonos zone (one of the external by Matsumoto and Iijima (1983) for the Chichibu Hellenides nappes, Greece) there exist two series of Chert Formation. radiolarites. The best known is ofJurassic age and is Because many factors influence the original sed­ several tens of meters thick. The other one, only a imentation rate (turbidites, redeposition, input of few meters thick, belongs to the Drimos St>l NltIH.lA::>c; 6Cl NltlSINIt w +::- NltlNIOltl -f 6ll :IJ

NltINl:lltJ > (J) Oll (J) ()

Nltll:lON

Nltl.l3ltHl:l y' 1901-om: I t>Ol ( Wl ) _~!,.!..~_N'y!.:!:~.H__

Nltll:lnV

NltiJorlt8 c... c ------t-IOH :IJ > (J) NltlNOH.llt8 (J)

BS~ o

NVl/\OllltJ

S~-lv~ os~

NVIOl:lO::lXO

ot>~ Nltl~OIl:l3WWI>l (S£~) ------NltlNOH.ll.l ~-Ll~ I oc~ NltISltll:ll:l38 9U 00 ~ mr~ -n~lf)- l/l :;~b n ;0 ~~~~ ~~S:~=i~~S'~ > o Ie$:;>; l/l::: ""0 CD lJl >::l 0 C ;0 S' cu' C s: 01 l/lOl=:OCUnn>I;o0 C C ~. ., c 3 Ie - >->IS: i;f 01 CDIC'> CDII ~ ~.g 1}'" ~ .., tO~: m- til -< -::l-, n Z 8' m lJl n ;~ ~» ~' ~ N 01 ""0 ::l ; II ~. ~. n r -- ~ ~ g o~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~. ~.::. ~ ~ ~ -<::l" o g o >' ~ n .., -< d ~ ~ .., ro z:::Oo ~ ~ --1~Vl ~ -OC VI ~ ~ C'l~. ~ c~ ~ ~.§= ~ ~~ ~ o """i OJ m:J OJ ~ » ""0:; C)~ ~ lJl3 n I ro U m A ;0 ~ ~. C'D ""0 _0' N ~ -, z o C ~ ~]:~ ~~'~Q~'~ m > ""0 nn ~ ~ N v v -i~, ~ - 01 :;; o C l/l"Tl ::l Vl ~QJ ~. ~ ""O~ ;>; -£ (l) m?I vv r' ;:; , >01 ~I;o n ::l l7J "';olJl ""0 m r- o ::l .., :g m "', > > l/l ~ ...., 0 '" < cOl/l Cl>~ 0= -< r ro vr - s: lJl $:'" C)O 01 l o ~. o z > > s: }> < C) Z ~00 > ~~ ~~ ~ > > :;; z m C ;>; ;0 > n -< ~ iii' "'"l 0' • :;>0:;'" FIGURE 3.2. Summary table of radiolarite ages based on radiolarian for radiolarite directly overlying ophiolites. (4) Hatching represents V (1l data presented in this paper. (1) Paleontological data for radiolarite an uncertainty about the age either due to a lack of precision of the ~ associated only with sedimentary sequences. (2) Paleontological paleontological data or due to the structural and/or lithostratigraphic <: (1l data for chert from interpillow lava spaces. (3) Paleontological data relations. "'"l 3. Radiolarites, Circum-Mediterranean Alpine Belts 35

Formation (Dercourt et al., 1973; Fleury, 1980). It sic: latest Anisian or early Ladinian; Dumitrica and has long been considered to be Triassic but has Mello, 1982) and (Kozur and Mock, recently been dated as Liassic (De Wever and 1973). Origlia-Devos, 1982b) Hawasina Nappes () Budva Zone (Yugoslavia) In the Hamrat Dum Group, the Wahra Formation This zone in Yugoslavia is equivalent to the Pindos­ and the Lower Zulla and Upper Sid'r Formations all Olonos zone in Greece and contains the same two contain thick sequences of radiolarian-bearing chert levels of radiolarites. The Budva radiolarite-bearing interbedded with clastic sedimentary rocks. Sam­ sequences have recently been dated as Liassic ples from AI Jil cherts (= lower part of the Zulla for­ (Obradovic and Gorican, this volume; Gorican, mation in Glennie et al., 1974) yielded radiolarian 1987). fauna denoting late Murghabian and Late Triassic (Carnian-) ages (Bourdillon et al., 1987; De Maliac Series (Greece) Wever, unpublished data). Additional chert samples This sequence (one of the internal Hellenides from the Matbat Formation (upper part of the Zulla nappes, Greece) has an unknown basement (pre­ + lower part of Guwayza in Glennie et al., 1974) sently subducted under the internal zones). Triassic indicate an Early Jurassic age (Bourdillon et al. chert has been dated from different sections. Some 1987; De Wever, unpublished data). Several dates are associated with only sedimentary rocks (Logis­ mentioned by Blome et al. (1983) are well in accor­ tion series, lower Ladinian-Carnian; Ferriere, dance with those given here. However, the precise 1982). According to Vrielynck (1982), the Maliac lithostratigraphic position of their samples was not series may be considered to have been deposited on given, so it is impossible to ascertain whether they the lower part of the Pelagonian margin facing actually correspond to the formations listed here. toward the Neo-Tethyan ocean. These data are cur­ rently the only paleontological evidence of an Radiolarites Overlying Ophiolites oceanic area existing in Triassic time between Eura­ (Triassic-Liassic) sia and Africa-Arabia. Darno Series (Hungary) Antalya Nappe Series () In the Lower Austro-AIpine unit, chert associated In the Isparta-c;ay series, radiolarite-bearing inter­ with ophiolite pillow basalt has been dated as Middle vals are interbedded with limestone yielding halo­ Triassic (De Wever, 1984). bians, conodonts (Poisson, 1977), and radiolarians Rarau Series (Romania) (De Wever et al., 1979; De Wever, 1982) ofLate Tri­ assic (Norian) age. In transylvanian nappes (Rarau and Persani Moun­ tains, eastern Carpathian Mountains, Romania), Lagonegro Series (Italy) radiolarite has been dated as Middle Triassic (Ladin­ In southern Italy (Lucany, Lagonegro region), radi­ ian; Dumitrica and Mello, 1982). olarite overlies a cherty limestone sequence (Trias­ Diabase-Chert Unit (Yugoslavia) sic) which is in turn overlain by the clastic Galestri Formation (Neocomian). The first deposition of In the Diabase-Chert Formation from Serbia (Yu­ these cherts is diachronous, from Triassic to the goslavia), radiolarian chert (near pillow basalts) south (Lagonegro unit) to Upper Jurassic to the has been dated as Late Triassic (Carnian-Norian) north (San Fele unit) (De Wever and Miconnet, (Obradovic and Gorican, this volume; Gorican, 1985) (Fig. 3.3). 1986).

Meliata Unit (Czechoslovakia) Porphyrite-Chert Unit (Yugoslavia) The Meliata unit (Czechoslovakia) belongs to the In the Porphyrite-Chert Unit from Serbia (Yugo­ Slovac edifice. It is an extension of the Bukk unit slavia), radiolarian cherts near volcanic rocks have (Hungary) and represents the termination of the been dated as Middle Triassic (Anisian-Carnian) Vardar zone (Dercourt et al., 1985a,b). It has been (Obradovic and Gorican, this volume; Gorican, dated as Triassic using radiolarians (Middle Trias- 1986). 36 Patrick De Wever

N San Fele U. s

~~~n:::~~~~===------pjQr~Abric;i~~------'-iii=--IOII. Pignola - Abriola Unit Sasso di Castaldo Unit - -lOOOm Armizzone Unit Lagonegro Unit --2000m

o, 30km

FIGURE 3.3. Reconstruction ofLagonegro (southern Italy) level). (E-G) Calcaires a Silex Formation (cherty lime­ for Norian time (from De Wever and Miconnet, 1985). stone). E-San Fele Unit, massive dolomite; F-Pignola­ (A) Hypothetical rock basement (partly provided detritus Abriola Unit, bedded dolomite and dolomitic limestone; to the basin). (B) Basement cover and Scythian platform. G-Sasso di Castalda, Armizzone and Lagonegro Units. (C) Primary dolomite (partly provided detritus to the (H) Radiolarite belonging to Armizzone and Lagonegro basin). (D) Monte Facito Formation (probable thrusting (and Sasso di Castalda ?) Units.

Maliac Series (Greece) older in basinal deposits (from Bajocian or Batho­ nian, Lombardy Basin, Umbria) and younger on Triassic cherts associated with basalts from the plateau deposits (mid-Oxfordian, Trento plateau) Maliac series (internal Hellenides nappes, Greece) (Baumgartner et al., 1980; Kocher, 1981; Baumgart­ have unknown basement rocks (presently sub­ ner, 1984; Conti et al., 1985; Conti, 1986). Radi­ ducted under the inner zones). Chert occurs between olarites are synchronously capped by Maiolica pillow lavas and has been dated as Late Triassic limestone (Govi, 1965; Luthi, 1973). (Tourla series, Norian; De Wever, 1982; Ferriere, 1982). Lagonegro Series (Lucany, Italy) As noted above (Fig. 3.3), these series have a Mid-Upper Jurassic Radiolarites diachronous base (from Triassic to Oxfordian), but During this time period, radiolarite is common. As their top is synchronous (Before Neocomian time) in the previous examples, it is associated with sedi­ (De Wever and Miconnet, 1985). mentary and volcanic sequences. Sciacca Series (, Italy)

Radiolarites Within Sedimentary Sequences The base of this series is unknown, because it is cut by an overthrust fault, but the top has been precisely "Chaines Calcaires" (Rif, Morocco) dated with ammonites, calpionellids, nannofossils, The base of this formation is diachronous based on and radiolarians as the exact boundary between radiolarian dates, from Bajocian or Bathonian to Kimmeridgian and Tithonian (De Wever et al., or Oxfordian within different structural 1986b). units (Fig. 3.4), the oldest being to the south (exter­ Pindos-Olonos Series (Greece) nal zones) (De Wever et al., 1985). The top of this chert formation is synchronous in all structural Radiolarite has been studied in several sections from units, Kimmeridgian or early Tithonian. northern and southern Greece (Fig. 3.1). The bases of the sections are dated as Bajocian or Bathonian Southern (Lombardy, Tuscany, (Thiebault et al., 1981; De Wever and Thiebault, and Umbria, Italy) 1981; De Wever and Cordey, 1986), and the top is Radiolarite sections are well known in northern Tithonian (De Wever and Origlia-Devos, 1982a; De Italy, where their bases are diachronous. Bases are Wever and Cordey, 1986) except in southernmost 3. Radiolarites, Circum-Mediterranean Alpine Belts 37

Outer s " Dorsole Colcoire" N INNER PART OUTER PART ==== unit 1 ======~ unit 2 ~~======unit 3 ======MALM ® .Ie 0 m 000 ~ 6 .2 n~iJ 3

l---~~I 4 6 5 !f±J 6 @) DOGGER 7 e Om-- 0 ~8 000 000 9

i'o \ I D_O_M_E_R_IA_N_-_T_O_A_R_C_IA_N;-- \"---'=""'e 0 m __

--::=:::=x:~~~\,3! \ \ '4 000

SINEMURIAN-CARIXIAN ® Ie, Om--

HETTANGIAN CD * Om--

FIGURE 3.4. Paleogeographic evolution of the Chrafate filaments"; (4) black shale; (5) Ammonitico Rosso; (6) klippes and the external "Dorsale Calcaire" (Rif, cherty limestone; (7) massive limestone; (8) dolomitic Morocco) zone during Jurassic time (from De Wever et massive limestone; (9) horizontal grading. al., 1985). (1) Turbidite; (2) radiolarites; (3) "calcaires a 38 Patrick De Wever

Peloponnesus, where a few outer units contain radio­ (Lokut and Tata Hills), but in other places radiolarite larites as young as the Late . However, persists to the Kimmeridgian (Cszernye Hills) or during Tithonian time, some thick, coarse clastic even to the Kimmeridgian-Tithonian boundary intervals are interbedded (Thiebault et aI., 1981; De (Margit Hill-De Wever, unpublished data). Wever and Thiebault, 1981). Upper Austro-Alpine Series Budva Series (Yugoslavia) Czechoslovakia (Silica Nappe) A series equivalent to the Pindos-Olonos series Radiolarite (equivalent to the series of the Slovak exists in Montenegro (Yugoslavia), where it has Karst) is dated as Callovian or Oxfordian (Dumitrica been dated as Middle Jurassic to Late Jurassic and Mello, 1982). (Obradovic and Gorican, this volume; Gorican, 1987). Hawasina Nappes (Oman) In the Hamrat Duru Group, the Wahra Formation, Pelagonian Series (Internal Hellenides, the Lower Zulla and Upper Sid'r Formations all con­ Strimbes, Greece) tain thick sequences of radiolarian-bearing chert Radiolarites from Pelagonian series (Othrys, con­ interbedded with clastic sedimentary rocks (turbi­ tinental Greece) have been dated as Kimmeridgian­ dites). Radiolarian fauna obtained from the Sid'r Tithonian with radiolarians (det. Origlia-Devos in chert indicate a Late Jurassic to Neocomian age Ferriere, 1982, p 930) (Bourdillon et aI., 1987; De Wever, unpublished data). Several dates have been mentioned by Blome Pelagonian Series (Asklepeion Nappe, et aL (1983) and by Baumgartner (1984,) for the Al Angelokastron Cherts, Internal Aridh Formation. Their dates are in accordance Hellenides, Greece) with those given here. However, they did not pro­ Radiolarites have been dated in the Peloponnesus. vide precise lithostratigraphic positions for their Their first occurrence is Bathonian (Asklepeion samples, so it is impossible to ascertain whether they Nappe-Baumgartner, 1984) or late Oxfordian (An­ correspond to the stratigraphic levels analyzed here. gelokastron Chert and Ayios Nikolaos Formation­ Baumgartner, 1984; they correspond to the Epidaure Autochtonous Unit (Oman) zone and Trapezona zone ofVrielynck, 1978, 1980, Overlying the Sahtan Group (shallow-water Jurassic 1982 at this time period). limestone) is the Kahmah Group, which yielded radiolarians in chert at the base of the section Pelagonian Series (Evvoia, Greece) interbedded with limestone (with Calpionellids). Radiolarite from northern Evvoia has been dated The chert was dated as late Tithonian or early Berri­ with radiolarians as Oxfordian or Kimmeridgian, asian (Bourdillon et al., 1987; De Wever, unpub­ except the latest Kimmeridgian (Baumgartner, lished data). 1984; Ferriere et aI., 1986). This radiolarite was dated as MaIm or Neocomian (Baumgartner and Radiolarite Overlying Oceanic Crust Bernoulli, 1976), but more recent information per­ mits us to restrict the age as mentioned above. Good outcrops of ophiolite-hosted radiolarite are rare because of metamorphism. Nevertheless, some Upper Austro-Alpine Series in Hungary significant data already exist. (Bakony and Gerecze Nappes) Series of the Ligurian Ophiolitic Nappe (Queyras In the upper Austro-Alpine nappes of Hungary and Corsica, ; and Elba, Italy) (Bakony and Gerecze Hills), the base of the radi­ olarite section is late Bajocian or Bathonian (in The metaradiolarite, which overlies the ophiolite Kozoskut, Lokut, Bakonycsernye sections - FUlop, and ophiolitic breccia of the Chabriere series (base 1969, 1976; De Wever, unpublished data) but else­ ofthe "Schistes Lustres"), has been dated in sections where is Bathonian (Gyenespuszta-Galacz, 1970, from France as late Oxfordian or early Kimmer­ 1976, 1980; De Wever, unpublished data). The idgian (De Wever and Caby, 1981) and on rocks radiolarite-bearing formation is overlain in some from Italy (Traversiera) as middle-upper Callovian places by a coarse clastic section of Oxfordian age (De Wever et aI., 1987a). 3. Radiolarites, Circum-Mediterranean Alpine Belts 39

Nonmetamorphosed radiolarite from Elba overly­ Bukk Ophiolitic Nappe (Bukk Massif, Hungary) ing pillow lava (Monte Campannelo-Nisporta, Vol­ The Bukk may be considered as a Neo-Tethyan sphe­ terraio) or ophicalcite (San Felo Namia) has been nochasm between Apulia and Europe (Dercourt et dated as middle Oxfordian or early Kimmeridgian aI., 1984a,b, 1985a,b). A Bajocian and/or Batho­ (Baumgartner, 1984; Conti and Marcucci, 1986). nian age was obtained (Kozur, 1984) for the upper This age is the same as that determined in other part of the radiolarite occurring in the wildflysch sections (Murlo, Southern Toscany-Conti and overlying ophiolites in the Bukk Massif (northeast Marcucci, 1986; San Colombano and kIn 59, Hungary) (Geyssant and Lepvrier, 1984). Corsica- De Wever et aI., 1987b). The shale between ophicalcite and radiolarite has been dated Bucovinian Nappe (Romania) at Rocchetta di Vara (eastern Ligurides) (Baum­ gartner, 1984) as middle Callovian or basal Oxford­ Pojorim radiolarite (crystalline Mesozoic zone of ian, and the basal part ofthe chert sequences is dated southeastern Carpathian Mountains) has long been as late Oxfordian or early Kimmeridgian (Conti considered to be ofMiddle Triassic age (Bancila and et aI., 1985; Conti and Marcucci, 1986). In the Papiu, 1953) but is now known to be of Callovian section at II Conventino (Monti Rignosi, eastern and/or Oxfordian age (Mutihac, 1968; Cioflica et Tuscany), the radiolarian assemblage gives a late aI., 1981; Dumitrica, unpublished data), as are most Callovian or early Kimmeridgian age (Conti and radiolarites of this zone. Marcucci, 1986). The onset of deposition of the Metalliferous Mountains (Southern Apuseni Monte Alpe Chert gives an upper age limit for basalt Mountains, Romania) extrusion in each section. The age of sedimentation overlying Ligurian ocean crust was therefore not The Dro<;ea-Cris Unit (of the Cris Nappe) contains synchronous. radiolarite dated as Oxfordian (Dumitrica in Bleahu et aI., 1981) overlying basalt. The Curechiu-Smnija Subpelagonian Nappe Series (Migdhalitsa unit has radiolarite dated as Oxfordian-Tithonian Unit, Argolis, Greece) (Dumitrica in Bleahu et aI., 1981) overlying ophio­ lite and tuffs. Radiolarite from the Migdhalitsa unit (Baumgartner, The Capllnas-Techereu Nappe (well developed in 1984; Fanary Wildflysch ofVrielynck, 1982) overly­ Metalliferous Mountains) has radiolarite dated as ing pillow basalt of the Ophiolite Suite (Akros Hill) late Callovian to late MaIm (Dumitrica, unpublished is dated near its contact with basalt as middle Callo­ data) interlayered with volcanic rocks, both ofwhich vian or early Oxfordian (Baumgartner, 1984) overlie ophiolite with a radiometric age of 180 Ma. This ophiolite volcanism was thus probably active Subpelagonian Nappe Series (Evvoia, Greece) before the Jurassic until the Callovian. Chert samples from interpillow space ofthe ophiolite Marmaros Unit (Klippen Zone, USSR) in northern Evvoia are dated as Oxfordian (Baum­ gartner, 1984; Ferriere et aI., 1986). Radiolarite from the Marmaros unit associated with ophiolites of the northeast Eastern Carpathians has Subpelagonian Nappe Series (Thessaly, Greece) been dated as Oxfordian and Kimmeridgian (Tik­ homirova, 1983, 1984). Oxfordian and/or Tithonian age was obtained for ra­ diolarite overlying ophiolite at Theopetra (De Wever in Ardaens, 1978; Ferriere, 1982), but the rocks Summary dated were not from the base of the section. All Triassic and Liassic radiolarite sections associ­ Diabase-Chert Formation, Serbian Units ated with sedimentary rocks are parts of allochto­ (Internal Dinarides, Yugoslavia) nous sequences. These radiolarites belong to nappes with unknown basement rocks, probably thinned In the Diabase-Chert Formation from western Ser­ continental crust (Dercourt et aI., 1985a,b; Ricou et bia (Yugoslavia), Upper Jurassic chert (Callovian aI., 1985)(Fig. 3.5). and/or early Kimmeridgian) containing radiolarians Radiolarite interbedded with sedimentary se­ has been identified (Obradovic and Gorican, this quences exists in basins that have received deposits volume; Gorican, 1986, p 58). since Triassic time (Lagonegro, Pindos-Olonos ~

.~ A '90" ---<--- ... •B U 6 ~7 = 2 DB 2->< '52' 3 ,/ j ..... 4 0 9 :' i ::::::: 10 \ '.' 5 i :7-.:;':';-'; 11 " " _.-;:.//",\ ~HaWaSinri Liassic ~(~H\" ~ '"1 FIGURE 3.5. Location ofradiolarite outcrops that were dated by olarite; (3) limestone; (4) flysch; (5) breccia; (6) emergent land n' :><;" radiolarian assemblages. Paleogeographic map from Dercourt (on any type of crust); (7) oceanic crust; (8) thin continental u et al. (1985a) map No.1 (Pliensbachian) is used for this report. crust (basin); (9) thick continental crust (platform); (10) active (l> (A) Radiolarite associated with sedimentary sequences; (B) spreading ridge; (11) spreading ridge when dying out. ~ <: (l> radiolarite associated with ophiolites. (1) Volcanism; (2) radi- '"1 3. Radiolarites, Circum-Mediterranean Alpine Belts 41 zone, ...) or in regions newly invaded by major Diachronism/synchronism transgressive water masses (Le., Austro-Alpine of Radiolarites zone, Inner Maghrebides). Detailed local studies (Rif, Morocco; Lagonegro, southern Italy; southern Diachronism characterized the earliest radiolarite Alps, northern Italy) suggest deposition on faulted sedimentation, whereas synchronism characterizes blocks of a rifting margin. Although the base of the the latest radiolarite sedimentation. In early studies radiolarite is not synchronous in different units, it of radiolarites, it appeared that the main radiolarite nevertheless generally starts around the Dogger. The sequences belonged to the Jurassic, confirming the maximum development of biosiliceous sedimenta­ classic hypothesis on the age of these deposits. Suc­ tion occurred during Oxfordian time. Their disap­ ceeding work dated the base and the top of radio­ pearance occurs synchronously near the Tithonian larite sections more precisely and revealed that the (Fig. 3.6). bases were not always of the same age. Detailed All allochtonous radiolarites associated with vol­ studies of the Dogger and MaIm radiolarites in canic rocks have been presumed to be the sedimen­ different regions documented a diachronism for the tary cover of oceanic crust, either of an open-ocean earliest radiolarite sedimentation and a synchronism basin crust or of a smaller ocean basin. for the top of the sections. The base ofradiolarite-bearing sequences (exclud­ The age variations correspond to different tilted ing mudstone locally known as umbers in blocks of a continental margin. In some places, age and Oman) associated with ophiolite is everywhere variations correspond to a stretching from the ocean dated as MaIm, but it is not exactly synchronous; toward the craton (Rif, Morocco; Lagonegro, Italy). data are still too few for a precise analysis. Such a margin may have corresponded to the The above descriptions consider only true radio­ development of a transform fault zone (Lemoine, larites, as defined in the Introduction. Other radio­ 1985; Dercourt et al., 1984a, b) between the open­ larian dates have recently been obtained from chert ing Atlantic Ocean and the subducting Neo-Tethys to nodules in circum-Mediterranean Alpine fold belts the south of the Alboran-Kabyly-Calabria block (De but are not considered in this paper because radio­ Wever et al., 1985). Radiolarite basins in northern larians were extracted from rock types other than Morocco migrated northward during Middle to Late radiolarite sensu stricto. Two sets of results are nev­ Jurassic time, suggesting sedimentation on tilted ertheless mentioned because of their geodynamic fault blocks (Fig. 3.4) with progressive northward implications. They are as follows: radiolarian­ formation of listric faults (Lemoine, 1982, 1985; bearing rocks associated with the Samail ophiolite, Lemoine et al., 1981; De Wever et al., 1985). Oman, and the Troodos ophiolite, Cyprus, yielded a The diachronism ofthe first radiolarite deposits in radiolarian fauna dated as Cretaceous: Turonian in Lagonegro (De Wever and Miconnet, 1985) and Cyprus (Blome and Irwin, 1985): in Argolis (Baumgartner, 1985) represent the same Oman (Schaaf and Thomas, 1986; De Wever et al., kind ofphenomenon-deposition on tilted blocks of 1988); and Albian-Cenomanian, Cenomanian­ an actively forming margin. Turonian, and Santonian-Campanian in Oman In other places, age variations correspond to the (Beurrier et al., 1987; Bourdillon et al., 1987). difference noted between basins and plateaus or sea­ Dated rocks are red mudstone or umbers (not radio­ mounts such as the Lombardian basin and Trento larite). plateau, northern Italy (Baumgartner, 1984) and Work is in progress on the radiolarian stratigra­ Bakony Hills, Hungary (Galacz, 1984; Galacz et al., phy of other regions: (1) to the east in the Sam­ 1985; De Wever, unpublished data). The first radio­ khet Karabagh (Lesser Caucasus, Georgia, USSR), larite deposits are not synchronous, but their maxi­ where the Jurassic Lesser Caucasus radiolarite mum extent of development is generally during the sequences have been dated as Callovian (to Bar­ Oxfordian. remian?) with the Kimmeridgian missing (Vishnev­ skaya, 1984), and (2) in the Klippen Belt of the Pienninnic sequences of the Csorstyn and Kysuca Disappearance of Radiolarites regions (Birkenmayer, 1977). With these new data it will be possible to date the distension of this It is now accepted that most radiolarites were not margin. deposited in wide-open basins or on continental -+:>. ? 40_ N

".~ l

\ \

'90,",,0' ~

""""'" "'<""';;"

A ~ •B D6 ~7 """""'2~ (' (' D8 )~)"", ~ 3 '0. /' / 4 D9 \ i :::::: 10 \~ '.' 5 i i ';-:7:';-: 11 i / ----!.~ / i i ' t- I ~ Maim (S.""1 ;;>:;" o FIGURE 3.6. Location ofradiolarite outcrops that were dated by this report. (A) Radiolarite associated with sedimentary ~ ~ their radiolarian assemblage as MaIm. Paleogeographic map sequences; (B) radiolarite associated with ophiolites. Legend is <: ~ from Dercourt et al. (l985a) map No.2 (Callovian) is used for same as for Figure 3.5. ""1 3. Radiolarites, Circum-Mediterranean Alpine Belts 43 slopes but in elongate basins (gutters) or small basins biophysical changes in the seas can produce strong with restricted oceanic circulation (Steinberg et aI., modifications in the planktonic life (see EI Nino 1977; Marcoux and Ricou, 1979; Jenkyns and Win­ effects; 5- to 20-fold reduction of primary produc­ terer, 1982; Iijima and Utada, 1983). These rela­ tivity-McGowan, 1984; Barber and Chavez, 1983; tively confined basins represent gulfs rich in organic Pisias et al., 1986), and because slight changes in matter such as in the modern GulfofCalifornia (Cal­ production of silica have an exaggerated result in sil­ vert, 1966; Nelson and Goering, 1978; Schrader et ica sedimentation (Fig. 3.7) (Renz, 1976; De Wever, aI., 1980; De Wever and Thiebault, 1981), Red Sea 1982). (Goll, 1969), and marginal seas such as the Sea of This abrupt change in sedimentation may have Japan (Steinberg et aI., 1977), Sea of Okhotsk, and occurred worldwide, but outside Tethys (Japan, Cal­ Bering Sea (Jenkyns and Winterer, 1982). ifornia, Mexico), radiolarite sedimentation gradu­ Areas of intense upwelling provide three condi­ ally gave way to terrigenous clastic sedimentation. tions which enhance the deposition and preservation Modifications in oceanic circulation could have ofradiolarian-rich sediments: (1) high nutrient levels resulted from tectonism associated with the Inner in upwelling regimes promote higher phytoplankton Hellenide zones (De Wever and Thiebault, 1981), productivity, in turn causing higher rates of radiolar­ but this mountain range did not totally close the ian productivity and deposition of radiolarian-rich Tethyan triangular basin. Moreover, such a closure deposits. Increased rates of radiolarian deposition would have increased the quantity of anoxic sedi­ decrease the rate ofdissolution ofsiliceous skeletons ment, which is not found; rather, anoxic deposits on burial: (2) increased rates of production of accumulated in isolated basins (Valaisan, Caucasus) organic matter beneath upwelling zones elevate the since the MaIm. In any case, there were shallow CCD, which removes organisms that seas in this region from Triassic time. This tec­ dilute the radiolarian-rich sediment: and (3) high tonism was probably not extensive enough to mod­ organic content prevents the dissolution of silica by ify the oceanographic conditions as far away as coating the tests (Kastner, Scripps Institution of Morocco. Oceanography, personal communication, 1986). Several characteristics we know about the Tethys The general geometry of the Tethys during Juras­ help to explain the disappearance of radiolarite sed­ sic time (an eastwardly open triangle) promoted imentation. upwelling on the western side and led to the develop­ ment of a clockwise gyre (De Wever and Thiebault, The Tethys opened in a westward direction since Tri­ 1981; Thiebault et aI., 1986). This triangular basin assic time (Aubouin and Tardy, 1980). was present from the creation of the neo-Tethys in East-west exchanges of waters occurred between Triassic time. During the Jurassic, the basin opened North and South America from Calloviantime, as and enlarged or spread to the west. This basin evolu­ is attested to by the migration of ammonites (Rein­ tion fits well with the progressive onset ofradiolarite eckeidae from Pacific to Tethys-Cariou, 1984; sedimentation from east to west from Triassic to Cariou et aI., 1985; or Parasenia from Tethys Jurassic time. In addition to the cause cited by to Pacific-Enay and Mangold, 1982). These Jenkyns and Winterer (1982), the absence of radio­ exchanges involved surface water masses, never larites in the Atlantic can be explained by the lack of deep water masses. upwelling in this basin and the large distance of this In the Latest Jurassic, a new current formed in the basin from areas of upwelling. Atlantic, as is evidenced by the arrival of Pygope In Tithonian times, radiolarian sedimentation in Greenland (Enay, 1980). suddenly stopped and was replaced by carbonate Oceanic conditions existed from Pamir to Mexico sedimentation (e.g., Oberalm in Northern Alps, (Dercourt et aI., 1984a, 1985a). Maiolica in Southern Alps (Lombardian zone), The exchange of deep water masses began during Biancona in Venetian Alps, Calpionellids Limestone Tithonian or Berriasian time somewhere between in Elba, Calcare Rupestre in Appennines (Umbria, North and South America (Berggren and Hol­ Marches), Vigla limestone in Greece (Ionian zone), lister, 1974; Thiede, 1979; Kennett, 1982). An "Calcaires aCalpionelles" in Greece (Pindos-Olonos oceanic communication has been illustrated by zone), Lattimusa in Sicily). Pindell (1985) between Tethys and Pacific Although this change was widespread, its cause (between the Yucatan block and Mexico) which need not have been a major one, because only slight significantly affected circulation. 44 Patrick De Wever

.... ~ r

1000000

800000

600000

Ql U 400000 c:: o 66 ." c:: ::J 200000 .Q ex 19 21 23 23 10 33 3327 8.11.30

Number of species

FIGURE 3.7. Comparison between biocenosis and than­ dredged on the sea floor in the same localities. The shift of tocenosis. (A) Radiolarian fauna caught on both sides of the maximum abundance is a result of equatorial gyres. the equator in the Pacific Ocean. (B) Radiolarian fauna

The sudden disappearance of all the radiolarites in deepening could have resulted from a "flush" effect the Latest Jurassic could be explained by a drastic at the beginning of the latitudinal current. In Japan, change in circulation due to a latitudinal flow being farther east, where radiolarites were not through Central America. Such a new communica­ diluted by clastic sedimentation, this modification tion drastically changed the current pattern from a in currents had no effect, and radiolarite sedimenta­ gyre in the Tethyan triangular basin (and its asso­ tion persisted until Neocomian time. ciated upwelling) to a latitudinal current and can The new circulation pattern affected most of the therefore explain the disappearance of radiolarite zones: the oldest rifted platforms (Austro-Alpine, sedimentation (De Wever et al., 1986a). This latitu­ southern Alps) as well as the troughs (Lagonegro, dinal current could have, at least locally, flowed from Pindos-Olonos zone, Budva zone). We have there­ east to west, as suggested by Thiebault et al. (1986). fore to interpret the paleogeography and/or paleo­ This hypothesis accords well with the long dura­ bathymetry ofthe areas where radiolarite deposition tion of radiolarite sedimentation of the east Arabian persisted after the installation of latitudinal currents margin of the Tethys Sea (Oman). In Oman, radio­ (i.e., southernmost Pindos zone, Greece) as con­ larite sedimentation continued until the Late Creta­ fined basins. The regions where radiolarites existed ceous, because this area remained under the influ­ through the Cretaceous were regions sheltered from ence of the upwelling conditions (De Wever and the new latitudinal current (Oman, Japan). Bourdillon, 1987; De Wever et al., 1988; De Wever, unpublished data). When the current pattern Acknowledgments. This work has been supported by changed to latitudinal circulation rather than a gyre, the CNRS (UA 319, ATP GGO No. 98 1039) and there was a sudden deepening of the basin recorded UNESCO lUGS (project IGCP 187). I am indebted in the sedimentary rocks of the Autochtonous Unit to A. Kemp (University of Southampton, U.K.) and in Oman. Sedimentation became progressively shal­ 1. Tauxe for their help with the English and to R. lower again during Neocomian time. This initial Garrison (University of at Santa Cruz), 1. 3. Radiolarites, Circum-Mediterranean Alpine Belts 45

Dercourt (University of Paris), J. Obradovic (Uni­ Samail (Sultanat d'Oman): Consequences tectogene­ versity of Belgrade and J.R. Hein (USGS, Menlo tiques. Comptes Rendus de 11\.cademie des Sciences, Park, CA) for reading the manuscript. Paris 304:907-910. Birkenmayer K (1977) Jurassic and Cretaceous lithostrati­ graphic units of the Carpathians, References Poland. Studia Geologica Polonica, Wydawnictwa Geo­ logiczne, Varsovie, XLV:2-115. Ardaens E (1978) Geologie de la chaine du Vardoussia, Bleahu M, Lupu M, Patrulius D, Bordea S, Stefan A, comparaison avec Ie Massif du Koziakas (Grece contin­ Panin S (1981) The structure of the Apuseni Mountains. nentale). These 3e cycle, Lille, France, 234 pp. Institut de Geologie et Geophysique, Guidebook Series, Aubouin J, Tardy M (1980) L'Amerique alpine: Le Bucharest, 23, 107 pp. domaine Caraibe et ses liaisons avec les cordilleres nord Blome CD Irwin WP (1985) Equivalent radiolarian ages et sud americaines: Introduction. In: Geologie des from ophiolitic terranes of Cyprus and Oman. Geology Chaines Alpines Issues qe la Tethys, Colloque C5, 13: 401-404. 26eme Congres Geologique International, Paris, pp Blome CD, Tippit P, Garrison RE, Bernoulli D, Smew­ 14-17. ing D (1983) Radiolarian Biostratigraphy of Hawasina Bancila I, Papiu VC (1953) Jaspurile triasice de la Pojor­ Complex, Northern Oman. American Association of ita. Academia Republicii Popular Romine, Buletin Stii­ Petroleum Geologists, abstracts of Annual Convention, nific Sectia de Stiinte Biologice, Agronomice, Dallas, p. 37. Geologice si Geografice, Bucharest, 54:665-694. Bourdillon- de Grissac C, De Wever P, Bechennec F Barber RT, Chavez FP (1983) Biological consequences of (1987) Nouvelles donnees biostratigraphiques des Mon­ El Nino. Science 222: 1203-1210. tagnes d'Oman du Permien au Cretace, a partir des Radi­ Barrett TJ (1981) Stratigraphy and sedimentology of olaires et Foraminiferes. Seance special. Societe Jurassic bedded chert overlying ophiolites in the north Geologique de France, Paris. "Geologie de rOman", Appennines, Italy. Sedimentology 29:353-373. Paris, abstracts, p 10. Bassoullet JP, Fourcade E, Peybernes B (1985) Paleobio­ Brewster NA (1980) biogenic silica sedimenta­ geographie des "grands" Foraminiferes benthiques des tion in the Antarctic Ocean. Bulletin of the Geological marges neotethysiennes au Jurassique et au Cretace Society of America, Boulder, Part 1, 91:337-347. inferieur. Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France, Calvert SE (1966) Accumulation of diatomaceous silica in Paris, 8:699-713. the sediments of the Gulf of California. Bulletin of the Baumgartner PO (1984) A middle Jurassic-early Creta­ Geological Society of America, Boulder, 77:569-596. ceous low-lattitude radiolarian zonation based on uni­ Cariou E (1984) Les Reineckeiidae (Ammonitina, Callo­ tary associations and age of Tethyan radiolarites. vien) de la Tethys occidentale: Systematique, dimor­ Eclogae Geologicae Helveticae, Bale, 77(3) :729-837. phisme et evolution. Etude a partir des gisements de Baumgartner PO (1985) Jurassic Sedimentary Evolution Centre-Ouest de la France. Documents du Laboratoire and Nappe Emplacement in the Argolis Peninsula de Geologie, Lyon, France, h.s. 8, 559 pp. (Peloponnesus, Greece). Memoire de la Societe Helve­ Cariou E, Contini D, Domrnergues JL, Enay R, Geyssant tique des Sciences Naturelles, 99, Bale, 111 pp. JR, Mangold C, Thierry J (1985) Biogeographie des Baumgartner PO, Bernoulli D (1976) Stratigraphy and Ammonites et evolution structurale de la Tethys au radiolarian fauna in a late Jurassic-early Cretaceous cours du Jurassique. Bulletin de la Societe Geologique section near Achladi (Evvoia, eastern Greece). Eclogae de France, Paris, 8:679-697. Geologicae Helveticae, 69(3): 1027-1061. Cioflica G, Savu H, Nicolae I, Lupu M, Vlad S (1981) Baumgartner PO, De Wever P, Kocher RN (1980) Correla­ Alpine Ophiolitic Complexes in South Carpathians and tion of Tethyan late Jurassic-early Cretaceous events. South Apuseni Mountains. Institut de Geologie et Cahiers de Micropaleontologie, Paris, 2:23-85. Geophysique, Guidebook Series, Bucharest, 18, 80 pp. Berggren WA, Hollister CD (1974) Paleogeography, Conti M (1986) New data on the biostratigraphy of the paleobiogeography and the history of the circulation in Tuscan cherts at Monte Cetona (southern Tuscany, the Atlantic Ocean. In: Hay WW (ed) Studies in Paleo­ Italy). In: De Wever P (ed), Eurorad IV, Marine Oceanography. Section of Economic Paleontologists Micropaleontology, Amsterdam, Vol 11, No. 1-3, and Mineralogists, Tulsa, OK, 20: 126-186. pp.107-112. Bertrand J, Delaloye M (1976) Datation par la methode Conti M, Marcucci M (1986) The onset of radiolarian K-Ar de diverses ophiolites du flysch des Gets (Haute deposition in the ophiolite sequences of the northern Savoie, France). Eclogae Geologicae Helveticae, Bale, Apennines. In: De Wever P (ed) Eurorad IV, Marine Mi­ 69:335-341 cropaleontology, Amsterdam, Vol 11, No. 1-3, pp Beurrier M, Bourdillon-de Grissac C, De Wever, P 129-138. Lescuyer JL (1987) Biostratigraphie des radiolarites Conti M, Marcucci M, Passerini P (1985) Radiolarian associees aux volcanites ophiolitiques de la nappe de cherts and ophiolites in the northern Apennine and Cor- 46 Patrick De Wever

sica: Age, correlations and tectonic frame of siliceous fordien superieur-Kimmeridgien moyen) dans les Alpes deposition. Ofioliti (Florence) 10(2/3):203-224. Cottiennes (Saint Veran, France). Comptes Rendus de Danelian T, De Wever P, Cordey F, Kito N (1987) Radi­ ll\cademie des Sciences, (Paris) 292(2):467-472. olaires jurassiques de Corse (France). Geobios (Lyon) De Wever P, Cordey F (1986) Datation directe par les (submitted). radiolaires de la base et de la pertie mediane des radiolar­ Dercourt J, Flament JM, Fleury JJ, Meilliez F (1973) ites s.s. de la serie du Pinde-Olonos (en Grece continen­ Stratigraphie des couches situees sous les Radiolarites tale). In: De Wever P (ed) Eurorad IV. Marine Micro­ de la zone du Pinde-Olonos (Grece): Le Trias superieur paleontology, Amsterdam, Vol 11, nl-3, pp 113-127. et Ie Jurassique inferieur. Annales Geologiques des Pays De Wever P, Dercourt J (1985) Les radiolaires triassico­ Helleniques (Athenes) XXV:397-406. jurassiques marqueurs stratigraphiques et paleogeograp­ Dercourt J, Geyssant J, Lepvrier C, Bergerat F, Bignot G, hiques dans les chaines alpines perimediterraneennes: Cros P, De Wever P, Geczy B, Guernet C, Lachkar G une revue. Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France, (1984a) Hungarian mountains in Alpine framework. Paris, 8:653-662. Acta Geologica Hungarica, Akademia Kiado Budapest De Wever P, Miconnet P (1985) Datations directes des 3-4:213-221. radiolarites du Bassin du Lagonegro (Lucanie, Italie Dercourt J, Ricou LE, Le Pichon X, Boulin J, Biju-Duval Meridionale). Implications et consequences. Revista B, Lepvrier C, Geyssant J, Zonenshain LP, Kazwin VG, Espanola de Micropaleontologia, (Madrid) XXll(3): Knipper AL, Sborshchikov 1M, Sorokhtin OG (1984b) 373-402. Geologic evolution ofthe Tethys convergence zone from De Wever P, Origlia-Devos I (1982a) Datations nouvelles Liassic to present between the Atlantic and Pamir. par les radiolaires de la serie des radiolarites s.1. du 27eme Congres Geologique International, Moscow, Pinde-Olonos, Grece. Comptes Rendus de ll\cademie (1984),204pp. des Sciences, (Paris) 294(2):399-404. Dercourt J, Zonenshain LP, Ricou LE, Kazmin VG, Le De Wever P, Origlia-Devos I (1982b) Datation par les Pichon X, Knipper A, Grandjacquet C, Sorocktin 0, radiolaires des niveaux siliceux du Lias de la serie du Geyssant J, Lepvrier C, Sborshchikov IV, Boulin J, Biju­ Pinde-Onolos (Formation de Drimos, Peloponnese et Duval B, Sibuet JC, Savostin, Westphal M, Lauer JP Grece continentale). Comptes Rendus de ll\cademie des (1985a) Presentation de 9 cartes paleogeographiques au Sciences, (Paris) 294(2): 1191-1198 1/20,000,000 s'etendant de ll\tlantique au Pamir pour la De Wever P, Thiebault F (1981) Les radiolaires d'age periode du Lias al'actuel. Bulletin de la Societe Geolo­ Jurassique superieur aCretace superieur dans les radio­ gique de France, Paris, 8:637-652. larites du Pinde-Olonos (Presqu'ile de Koroni, Pelopon­ Dercourt J, Zonenshain LP, Ricou LE, Kazmin VG, Le nese meridional, Grece). Geobios (Lyon) 14(5): Pichon X, Knipper A, Grandjacquet C, Sborshchikov 577-609. 1M, Geyssant J, Lepvrier C, Pechersky DH, Boulin J, De Wever P, Riedel WR, et al. (1979a) Eurorad 1978: Sibuet JC, Savostin, Sorocktin 0, Westphal M, Baz­ Recherches actuelles sur les radiolaires en Europe. henov ML, Lauer JP, Biju-Duval B (1985b) Geological Annales de la Societe Geologique du Nord (Lille) evolution of the Tethys belt from the Atlantic to the XVCIll(4): 205- 222. Pamirs since the Lias. Tectonophysics (Amsterdam) De Wever P, Sanfilippo A, Riedel WR, Gruber B (1979b) 123:241-315. Triassic radiolarians from Greece, Sicily, and Turkey. De Wever P (1982) Radiolaires du Trias et du Lias de la Micropaleontology 25(1):75-110. Tethys (Systematique, Stratigraphie). Societe Geolo­ De Wever P, Duee G, EI Kadiri KH (1985) Les series gique du Nord, Lille, Publication 7, 599 pp. stratigraphiques des klippes de Chrafate (Rif septen­ De Wever P (1984) Triassic radiolarians from the Darno trional , Maroc). Temoins d'une marge continentale sub­ area, Hungary. Acta Geologica Hungarica, Akademia sidente au cours du Jurassique-Cretace. Bulletin de la Kiado (Budapest) 3-4:295-306. Societe Geologique de France, Paris, 8:363-379. De Wever P (1987) Radiolarites rubanees et variations de De Wever P, Fourcade E, Ricou LE (1986a) La disparition l'orbite terrestre. Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de des radiolarites tethysiennes au Jurassique terminal: France, Paris, 8(III) :5, pp 957-960. L'effet d'un bouleversement de la circulation oceanique. De Wever P, Bourdillon-de Grissac C (1987) Nouvelles Comptes Rendus de ll\cademie des Sciences, (Paris) donnees biostratigraphiques des Montagnes d'Oman, du 302:665-670. Permien au Cretace, apartir des Radiolaires et Foramin­ De Wever P, Geyssant JR, Azema J, Devos I, Duee G, ireres. Seance Specialisee de la Societe Geologique de Manivit H, Vrielynck B (1986b) La coupe de Santa France, "Oman", Paris, abstract, p. 10. Anna (zone de Sciacca, Sicile): Une synthese biostra­ De Wever P, Bourdillon-de Grissac C, Beurrier M (1988) tigraphique des apports des macro-, micro-, et nannofos­ Radiolaires Senoniens de la Nappe de Samail (Oman). siles du Jurassique superieur et Cretace inferieur. Revue Revue de Micropaleontologie, Paris, (In press). de Micropaleontologie, (Paris) 29(3):141-186. De Wever P, Caby R (1981) Datation de la base des schis­ De Wever P, Baumgartner PO, Polino R (1987a) Datations tes lustres postophiolithiques par des radiolaires (Ox- des metaradiolarites des Schistes Lustres (Alpes 3. Radiolarites, Circum-Mediterranean Alpine Belts 47

Occidentales). Implications. Comptes Rendus de l~ca­ des Sciences de Rolando E6tv6s; Section Geologie demie des Sciences (Paris) 305:487-491. (Budapest) XVIII: 177-191. De Wever P, Danelian T, Durand Delga M, Cordey F, Kito Ga1

Iijima A, Tada R, Matsumoto R (1982) Sedimentary pet­ Luthi S (1973) Stratigraphie und Sedimentologie des Mte rographic study ofthe Neogene System in Hokkaido. In: Nudo Beckens (Vol I). Unpublished Diplomarbeit, Eid­ Tanai T (ed) Biostratigraphy of the Neogene System in genoessischen Technische Hochschule, Zurich.., Hokkaido. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo, pp Marcoux J, Ricou LE (1979) Classification des ophiolites 67-74. et radiolarites alpino-mediterraneennes d'apres leur Iijima A, Kakuwa Y, Matsuda H (1988) Silicified wood contexte paleogeographique et structural. Implications from the Adoyama Chert, Kuzuh, Central Honshu and sur leur signification geodynamique. Bulletin de la its bearing on compaction and depositional environ­ Societe Geologique de France, Paris, 7:643-652. ment of radiolarian bedded chert. In: Hein JR, Obra­ Matsuda T, Isozaki Y, Yao A (1980) Stratigraphic relation dovie J (eds) Siliceous Deposits ofthe Tethys and Pacific of Triassic-Jurassic system in Inuyama district, Mino Regions, Springer-Verlag, New York. Belt. Abstract Paper, 87th Annual Meeting of the Geo­ Isaacs CM, Pisciotto KA, Garrison RE (1983) and logical Society of Japan, p. 105. diagenesis of the Miocene Monterey Formation, Cali­ Matsumoto R, Iijima A (1983) Chemical sedimentology fornia: A summary. In: Iijima A, Hein JR, Siever R (eds) of some Permo-Jurassic and Tertiary bedded cherts in Siliceous Deposits in the Pacific Region. Developments Central Honshu, Japan. In: Iijima A, Hein JR, Siever R in Sedimentology, 36, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 247­ (eds) Siliceous Deposits in the Pacific Region. Develop­ 282. ments in Sedimentology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Vol 36, Jenkyns HG, Winterer EL (1982) Palaeoceanography of pp 175-191. Mesozoic ribbon radiolarites. Earth and Planetary Sci­ Me Bride EF, Thompson A (1970) The Caballos Novacu­ ences Letters, (Amsterdam) 60:351-375. lite, Marathon Region, Texas. Geological Society of Kennett J (1982) Marine Geology. Prentice-Hall, London America, Boulder, Special Paper 122, 129 pp. 813 pp. McGowan JA (1984) The California El Nino 1983. Kent DV, Gradstein FM (1985) A Cretaceous and Jurassic Oceanus (Woods Hole) 27(2)48-51. geochronology. Geological Society of American Bulle­ Mutihac V (1968) Structura Geologica a Compartimen­ tin, (Boulder) 96:1419-1427. tului Nordic din Sinclinalul Marginal Extern (Carpatii Kocher RN (1981) Biochronostratigraphische untersu­ Orientali). Edition Academiei, Bucharest, 127 pp. chungen oberjurassischer radiolarienfuehrender ges­ Nelson DM, Goering 11 (1978) Assimilation ofsilicic acid teine, insbesondere der sudalpen. Dissertation of Eid­ by phytoplankton in the Baja California and northwest genoessischen Technische Hochschule Nr 6809, Africa upwelling systems. Limnology and Oceanogra­ Zurich, 185pp. phy, (Lawrence) 23(3):508-517. Kozur H (1984) Jurassic radiolarians from the Bukk Odin SG, Kennedy WJ (1982) Mise ajour de l'echelle des Mountains and some remarks on the tectonic position of temps mesozo"iques. Comptes Rendus de ll\cademie des the area. Acta Geologica Hungarica Akademia Kaido Sciences, Paris, 294(II):383-386. (Budapest) 3-4:307-319. Obradovie J, Gorican S (1988) Siliceous deposits in Yugo­ Kozur H, Mock R (1973) Zum Alter und zur tektonischen slavia: Occurrences, types and ages. In: Hein JR, Obra­ Stellung der Meliata-Serie des Slowakischen Karstes. dovie J (eds) Siliceous Deposits ofthe Tethys and Pacific Geologicky Zbornik Geologica Carpathica (Bratislava) Regions. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 51-64. 24(2):365-374. Origlia-Devos I (1983) Radiolaires du Jurassique super­ Lemoine M (1982) Rifting and early drifting: Mesozoic ieur-Cretace inferieur: Taxonomie et revision strati­ central Atlantic and Ligurian Tethys. In: Sheridan RE, graphique (Zone du Pinde-Olonos, Grece; Zone de Gradstein FM, et aI., (eds) Initial Reports of the Deep Sciacca, Italie; Complexe de Nicoya, Costa Rica, et Sea Drilling Project 76. U.S. Government Printing Forages du DSDP). These 3eme cycle, Paris, 83-53, Office, Washington, pp 885-894. 328 pp. Lemoine M (1985) Structuration jurassique des Alpes Pessagno EA Jr, Newport RL (1972) A new technique for occidentales et palinspastique de la Tethys ligure. Bulle­ extracting radiolaria from radiolarian cherts. Micro­ tin de la Societe Geologique de France, Paris, paleontology 18(2):231-234. 8(1):127-138. Pichon JF (1977) Une transversale dans la zone pela­ Lemoine M, Gidon M, Barfety JC (1981) Les massifs gonienne, depuis les collines de Krapa (SW) jusqu'au cristallins externes des Alpes occidentales: D'anciens massif du Vermion (NE). Les premieres series trans­ blocs bascules nes au Lias lors du rifting tethysien. gressives sur les ophiolites. VIeme Colloquium on the Comptes Rendus de ll\cademie des Sciences, (Paris) Geology of the Aegean Region, Athenes (1977), Vol 1, 292(II):917-920. pp 163-171. Lemoine M, Bas T, Arnaud-Vanneau A, Arnaud H, Pindell JL (1985) Alleghenian reconstruction and subse­ Dumont T, Gidon M, Bourbon M, Graciansky (de) PC, quent evolution of the Gulf of Mexico, Bahamas and Rudkiewicz JL, Megard-Galli J, Tricart P (1986) The proto-Caribbean. Tectonics (Amsterdam) 4(1): 1-39. continental margin of the Mesozoic Tethys in the west­ Pisciotto KA, Garrison RE (1981) Lithofacies and deposi­ ern Alps. Marine and Petroleum Geologists, 3: 179-199. tional environments of the Monterey Formation, Cal- 3. Radiolarites, Circum-Mediterranean Alpine Belts 49

ifornia. In: Garrison RE et al. (eds) The Monterey Thiebault F, De Wever P, Raoult JF (1986) Marqueurs Formation and Related Siliceous Rocks of California. mineralogiques et geochimiques au passage Jurassique­ Pacific Section of the Society of Economic Paleon­ Cretace dans la serie du Pinde-Olonos en Peloponnese togists and Mineralogists, Tulsa, OK, pp 97-122. meridional (Grece). Revue de Geologie Dynamique et Pisias NG, Murray DW, Roelofs AK (1986) Radiolarian de Geographie Physique, (Paris) 27(5):351-362. and silicoflagellate response to oceanographic changes Thiede J (1979) Paleogeography and paleobathymetry of associated with the 1983 El Nino. Nature 320:259-262. the Mesozoic and Cenozoic North Atlantic Ocean. Poisson A (1977) Recherches geologiques dans les Taurides Geojournal (Wiesbaden) 3(3):263-272. occidentales (Turquie). These, Orsay, France, 795 pp. Tikhomirova LB (1983) Pozdneyurskiye-rannemelovyie Renz OW (1976) The distribution and ecology ofradiolaria radiolyarii Karpat (na territorii SSSR). Voprosy Mikro­ in the Central Pacific and surface sediments. paleontologii, (Moscow) 26:72-86. Bulletin ofScripps Institution ofOceanography, La Jolla, Tikhomirova LB (1984) The upper Jurassic and Creta­ University of California Press, Berkeley, 22, 267 pp. ceous radiolarian of the Mediterranean paleogeography Ricou LE, Zonenshain LP, Dercourt J, Kazmin VG, Le region (the Carpathians and the Lesser Caucasus). Mor­ Pichon X, Knipper AL, Grandjacquet C, Sborshchikov fologii, Ekologii i Evolutioni Radiolarii, Eurorad IV. 1M, Geyssant J, Lepvrier C, Pechersky DM, Boulin J, Academia Nauk SSR, Leningrad, pp 159-171. Sibuet JC, Savostin LA, Sorokhtin 0, Westphal M, Baz­ Tippit PR, Pessagno EA Jr, Smewing JD (1983) The bio­ henov ML, Lauer JP, Biju-Duval B (1985) Methodes stratigraphy of sediments in the volcanic unit of the pour l'etablissement de neuf cartes paleogeographiques Semail ophiolites. Journal of Geophysical Research, de l}\tlantique au Pamir depuis Ie Lias. Bulletin de la 86(B4):2756-2762. Societe Geologique de France, Paris, 8:625-635. Van Hinte JE (1976) Jurassic time scale. Bulletin ofAmer­ Ricou LE, Dercourt J, Geyssant J, Grandjacquet C, Lep­ ican Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, 60: vrier C, Biju-Duval B (1986) Geological constraints on 489-497. the Alpine evolution of the Mediterranean Tethys. Tec­ Vecsei A, Frisch W, Pirzer M, Wetzel A (1988) Origin and tonophysics (Amsterdam) 123:83-122. tectonic significance of radiolarian chert in the Aus­ Schaaf A, Thomas V (1986) Les radiolaires campaniens troalpine rifted continental margin. In: Hein JR, Obra­ du Wadi Ragmi (nappe de Semail, Oman): Un nouveau dovie J (eds) Siliceous Deposits ofthe Tethys and Pacific repere chronologique de l'obduction omanaise. Com­ Regions. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 65-80. ptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, Vishnevskaya V (1984) Radiolariti kak Analogy Sovre­ 303(11): 1593-1598. menih Radiolarievih Ilov. Nauka, Moscow, 120 pp. Schlager W, Schlager M (1973) Clastic sediments associ­ Vrielynck B (1978) Donnees nouvelles sur les zones ated with radiolarites (Tauglboden-Schichten, upper internes du peloponnese. Grece. Les massifs al'est de la Jurassic, eastern Alps). Sedimentology (Amsterdam) plaine d}\rgos. These 3e Cycle, Lille, 134 pp. 20:65-89. Vrielynck B (1980) Donnees nouvelles sur les zones Schrader HW, Kelts K, Curray J, Moore D (1980) Lami­ internes du peloponnese. Les massifs al'est de la plaine nated diatomaceous sediments from the Guayamas d}\rgos; Grece. Annales Geologiques des Pays Helle­ Basin slope (Central Gulf of California): 250,000 year niques (Athenes) XXIX:440-462. climatic record. Science 207:1207-1209. Vrielynck B (1982) Evolution paleogeographique et struc­ Steinberg M, Desprairies A, Fogelgesang JF, Martin A, turale de la presqu'ile d}\rgolide (Grece) Revue de Caron D, Blanchet R (1977) Radiolarites et sediments Geologie Dynamique et de Geographie Physique, hypersiliceux oceaniques: Une comparaison. Sedimen­ (Paris) 23:277-288. tology (Amsterdam) 24(4):547-563. Westermann GE (1984) Gauging the duration of stages: A Thiebault F, De Wever P, Fleury JJ, Bassoullet JP (1981) new approach for the Jurassic. Episodes (Ottawa) 7:2, Precisions sur la serie stratigraphique de la nappe du 26-28. Pinde de la presqu'ile de Koroni (Peloponnese meridi­ Yugoslav Committee for IGCP 86 Guide-Book with onale, Grece): Vage des radiolarites (Dogger-Cretace Abstracts for the Third International Conference on superieur). Annales de la Societe Geologique du Nord Siliceous Deposits, IGCP 187, Belgrade, Yugoslavia, (Lille) C:91-105. 112 pp.