A History of Marion County, South Carolina, from Its Earliest Times To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A History of Marion County, South Carolina, from Its Earliest Times To A HISTORY OF MARION COUNTY. SOUTH CAROLINA, From Its Earliest Times to the Present, 190U By W. W. SELLERS, Esq., of the Marjon Bar. Columbia, S. C. Thk R. I,. Bkyan Company, 1902. v-ll 11 1 / 1^^ Copyright, 1902, By John C. Sbi<i.BRS. : CONTENTS Chapter I. Settlement i Chapter II. Section I. Location and Boundaries 6 Section II. Its Surface and Soil, Its Rivers and Lakes, Its In- Land Swamps iS Section III. Its Soil and Productions Vj Section IV. Stock Raising 29 Chapter III. Section I. Its Educational, Political and Judicial History 33 Graduates of Colleges 50 Political History 52 Queensboro Township 78 Plat of the Welch Grant (First) 81 The Early Settlement of Marion County 104 Some Families mentioned Godbold 117 Evans 125 Giles 13s Britton, Fladger. etc 137 Crawford 142 Murfees 147 Berry 148 Saunders I57 Gibson 159 Page 162 Ayres 166 Ford 167 Hays 170 Elvington 173 Scott I7S Owens 17s Gaddy 176 Lupo and Arnett 178 Rogers 178 Perritt 183 Edwards i8s Nichols 189 Hutchinson 191 Barfield 191 Goodyear 192 Tart 193 Bryant I97 Watson 199 IV A HISTORY OF MARION COUNTY. R<>aves 206 208 Grice Roberts 209 EUerbee ^^3 218 Fore : Mace 221 Finklea 223 Haselden ^^3 Bass 22s Hamer 232 McKenzie ^35 Manning •' 238 Jones 241 Cottinghara 246 Hamilton 247 Braddy 249 Clark 252 Harrelson 255 Martin 258 Henry 261 Huggins 263 Hayes 267 Dew 271 Nicholson 275 Jackson 276 Galloway 281 Sherwood 281 Alford 282 Greenwood 284 Mclnnis 285 Stafford 287 Blue 289 Baker 290 McPriest 291 McKellar 291 McKay 292 McCormick 293 McArthur 299 Mclntyre 300 McKinly 307 McLellan 308 Sinclair 314 McDuifie 315 Campbell 320 Butler 327 Moody 330 A HISTORY OP MARION COUNTY. V Harllee 342 Woodberry 355 Stackhouse 358 Wayne 366 Legette 369 Gasque 373 Brown 373 Gilchrist 382 Easterling 384 Lane 386 Bethea 395 McMillan ; 421 Miller 425 Spencer * 427 Williamson 429 Wall 432 McEachern 435 Carmichael 437 Baker 445 Davis 448 . Stanley .. '. 455 Harrel, in Britten's Neck 456 Altman 456 Whaley 457 Richardson 457 Stevenson 462 Craven 463 Thompson 464 Kirton 464 Philips 465 Owens 466 Rowell 468 Giles 471 Coleman 472 Norton 475 Lewis 480 Fowler 483 Shooter 484 Campbell (of Maiden Down) 486 Atkinson 488 Fladger 49i Smith 492 Flowers 502 Mullins , 506 Gregg 510 Collins ' 512 VI A HISTORY OP MARION COUNTY. Wiggins, of Wahee Si" Shaw Si8 Dozier S2i Foxworth and Boatwright 5^2 White and Monroe S25 Sniipes 528 Wilcox 536 Young 537 Johnson 538 Sellers 543 The Negro 546 Towns of the County 55° Marion 551 Nichols and Mullins 553 Latta and Dillon 555 Hamer and Sellers 559 The Denominational Churches 560 Clerks of Court for Marion County, from 1800 to 1900 564 Sheriffs for Marion County from 1800 to 1900 565 Representatives in the Legislature 566 Senators from 1800 to igoo 568 Ordinaries and Probate Judges from 1800 to 1900 568 Proprietary Governors 568 Lawyers practicing at Marion from 1800 to 1900 570 Volunteers in Confederate Army 572 Company L, 21st Regiment Infantry, C. S. A : . 572 Company H, Orr's Regt. Rifles S. C. V., C. S. A 577 Company F, 4th Regt. Cav. S. C. V., C. S. A 581 Company E, Gregg's i«t Regt. S. C. V., C. S. A 585 Company I, 8th Regt. Inf. S. C. V., C. S. A 590 Company H, 8th Regt. Inf. S. C. V., C. S. A 593 Company I, ist Regt. Inf. (Hagood's) S. C. V., C. S. A. 596 Company L, loth Regt. Inf. S. C. V., C. S. A 599 Company L, 8th Regt. Inf. S. C. V., C. S. A 602 Company I, 21st Regt. Inf. S. C. V., C. S. A 605 Company E, 23d Regt. Inf. S. C. V., C. S. A 609 Company Gregg's Battery, Co. D, Manigault's Battalion Artillery S. C. V., C. S. A 613 Company H, 23d Regt. Inf. S. C. V., C. S. A. 620 Company D, loth Regt. Inf. S. C. V., C. S. A 626 Company F, loth Regt. Inf. S. C. V., C. S. A 628 Company I, 6th Regt. Cav. S. C. V., C. S. A 631 Company D, 2Sth Regt. Inf. S. C. V., C. S. A 632 Company E, 26th Reg. Inf. S. C. V., C. S. A 636 Company I, loth Regt. Inf. S. C. V., C. S. A 639 Company D, 7th Battalion S. C. Reserves 642 Company of Militia, last called into service 644 PREFACE Within the last ten or twelve years the author has been solicited to write a history of this, Marion County, and by many whose opinions and judgment he much valued ; but then being much engaged in the practice of the law, he could not find the time to engage in and complete such a work. Further- more, he felt a diffidence in his abilities to perform the task with satisfaction and credit to himself. January, 1898, he concluded to retire from the active practice of his profession, for the reason, first, that his sense of hearing became much impaired; and secondly, because of his age, then near eighty years old. He retired, and since that time has taken no new case, and confined himself only to old cases then pending in the Courts of Marion, Florence and Horry Counties; cases, too, that his junior partner had had nothing to do with and knew but little about. Those cases were in due time mostly ended. After this work in the Courts was practically accomplished, and having fair health aiid strength for one of his age, physi- cally and mentally, he determined to undertake the work, and for the last eighteen months has been engaged principally in its performance, and he herewith submits it to the people of the county, and it will be for them to say whether he has succeeded well or has failed to meet expectations. Such as it is, it is his own work. Its subject matter, the language used, the style, manner and composition are all his own. He has not borrowed from another author without giving to that other full credit by placing the language used in quotation marks, and referring to the author by name and page. He acknowledges his indebt- edness to Dr. Ramsay's History of South Carolina, to Bishop Gregg's History of the Old Cheraws, to the Lives of General VIII A HISTORY OP MARION COUNTY. Marion written by M. L. Weems, and General Horry, and the same by W. Gilmore Sims, to the Statutes at Large as pub- lished by Dr. Thomas Cooper, and to perhaps other sources. information He is further indebted to many of our citizens for as to families that he could not otherwise have obtained. It may be found that he has made mistakes. It will be a wonder if it is not so found. He expects no other. In men- is tioning families, it is mainly genealogical. All genealogy history, and he trusts that families for the next three or four generations, at least, may be able to trace their ancestry back to and including what is herein written; that it will not be then, as he has found it in his inquiries of persons, when writing this history, that some of them of superior intelligence did not know who their grands-father was. Many of the old families have become extinct by death or removal. The author may have omitted to notice some that now exist. Where that is the case, it was because the author knew nothing or but little about them, and could not ascertain anything in reference to them. He tried to get a list of the graduates of literary col- leges from Marion County, but some of them did not answer inquiries. Hence he had to depend on memory. Marion may well congratulate herself on the number and character of her young and older men of learning. She is fast coming to the front in that line, as well as in many other lines. He has furnished a list of all the Clerks of the Court, Sheriffs and Probate Judges or Ordinaries from the earliest times of her existence as a Judicial District. Also, a list of her Senators in the Legislature and Representatives. Further, a list of all the lawyers that have practiced in Marion since 1800. He has also procured and inserted a list of all the Governors of the province, proprietary and royal, while a province, and all after it became an independent State down to the present time, and last, but not least in importance and in its numbers, a list of all A HISTORY OF MARION COUNTY. IX the companies that went from Marion to the Confederate War. This list embraces West Marion, including all company officers, what became of them, killed in battle or died of disease or wounds ; whether living or dead now, so far as is known, and much other information concerning our brave boys during that momentous struggle. All of which the author trusts may be of interest to many, very many, of the present generation. The author, now in his eighty-fourth year, submits what he has done in this regard as his last work on the stage of life. It has been a labor of love, for the county in which he has spent most of his life, and for any errors, omissions and failures he asks the indulgence of its people, to wliom he herein and hereby respectfully dedicates the result of his labors.
Recommended publications
  • Fy2019givingreport.Pdf
    GLOBAL MISSIONS Fiscal Year 2019 Church Giving Report For the Period 7/1/2018 to 6/30/2019 Name Pastor(s) City State Contribution Pentecostals of Alexandria Anthony Mangun Alex LA $581,066.32 Bethel United Pentecostal Church D. D. Davis, Sr, Doyle Davis, Jr Old Westbury NY $372,979.45 Capital Community Church Raymond Woodward, John Leaman Fredericton NB $357,801.50 The First Church of Pearland Lawrence Gurley Pearland TX $313,976.61 The Pentecostals of Bossier City Jerry Dean Bossier City LA $263,073.38 Eastgate United Pentecostal Church Matthew Tuttle Vidor TX $242,324.60 Calvary Apostolic Church James Stark Westerville OH $229,991.33 First United Pentecostal Church of Toronto Timothy Pickard Toronto ON $222,956.11 United Pentecostal Church of Antioch Gerald Sawyer Ovett MS $183,861.00 Heavenview United Pentecostal Church Harold Linder Winston Salem NC $166,048.10 Calvary Gospel Church Roy Grant Madison WI $162,810.38 Atlanta West Pentecostal Church Darrell Johns Lithia Springs GA $156,756.25 Antioch, The Apostolic Church David Wright, Chester Wright Arnold MD $152,260.00 The Pentecostals of Cooper City Mark Hattabaugh Cooper City FL $151,328.04 Southern Oaks UPC Mark Parker Oklahoma City OK $150,693.98 Apostolic Restoration Church of West Monroe, Inc Nathan Thornton West Monroe LA $145,809.37 First Pentecostal Church Raymond Frazier, T. L. Craft Jackson MS $145,680.64 First Pentecostal Church of Pensacola Brian Kinsey Pensacola FL $144,008.81 The Anchor Church Aaron Bounds Zanesville OH $139,154.89 New Life Christian Center Gary Keller
    [Show full text]
  • Birth of a Colony North Carolina Guide for Educators Act IV—A New Voyage to Carolina, 1650–1710
    Birth of a Colony North Carolina Guide for Educators Act IV—A New Voyage to Carolina, 1650–1710 Birth of a Colony Guide for Educators Birth of a Colony explores the history of North Carolina from the time of European exploration through the Tuscarora War. Presented in five acts, the video combines primary sources and expert commentary to bring this period of our history to life. Use this study guide to enhance students’ understanding of the ideas and information presented in the video. The guide is organized according to five acts. Included for each act are a synopsis, a vocabulary list, discussion questions, and lesson plans. Going over the vocabulary with students before watching the video will help them better understand the film’s content. Discussion questions will encourage students to think critically about what they have viewed. Lesson plans extend the subject matter, providing more information or opportunity for reflection. The lesson plans follow the new Standard Course of Study framework that takes effect with the 2012–2013 school year. With some adjustments, most of the questions and activities can be adapted for the viewing audience. Birth of a Colony was developed by the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, in collaboration with UNC-TV and Horizon Productions. More resources are available at the website http://www.unctv.org/birthofacolony/index.php. 2 Act IV—A New Voyage to Carolina, 1650–1710 Act IV of Birth of a Colony is divided into three parts. The first part explores the development of permanent English settlements in North Carolina. For nearly 70 years after the mysterious disappearance of the Lost Colony, North Carolina remained void of European settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Church and State: a Diffusion of Reason and Religion
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2006 Separation of Church and State: A Diffusion of Reason and Religion. Patricia Annettee Greenlee East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Greenlee, Patricia Annettee, "Separation of Church and State: A Diffusion of Reason and Religion." (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2237. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2237 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Separation of Church and State: A Diffusion of Reason and Religion _________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University __________________ In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History _________________ by Patricia A. Greenlee August, 2006 _________________ Dr. Dale Schmitt, Chair Dr. Elwood Watson Dr. William Burgess Jr. Keywords: Separation of Church and State, Religious Freedom, Enlightenment ABSTRACT Separation of Church and State: A Diffusion of Reason and Religion by Patricia A.Greenlee The evolution of America’s religious liberty was birthed by a separate church and state. As America strides into the twenty first century the origin of separation of church and state continues to be a heated topic of debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodism Among Nova Scotia's Yankee Planters
    Methodism Among Nova Scotia's Yankee Planters Allen B. Robertson Queen's University During the 1770s two revivalist evangelical sects gained a following in Nova Scotia; one, Newlight Congregationalism — with both Predestinar- ian and Free Will variants — grew out of the religious and social heritage of the colony's dominant populace, the New England Planters. The other sect, Wesleyan Methodism, took root among transplanted Yorkshiremen who moved between 1772 and 1776 to the Isthmus of Chignecto region where it was initially propagated among the faithful in local prayer groups. Ordained and lay preachers of both movements promoted a series of revivals in the province which drew an increasing number of followers into the evangelical fold.1 The first of these revivals was the Newlight- dominated Great Awakening of 1776-84. In general, Newlightism's greatest appeal was in the Planter townships even though it mutated by 1800 into a Baptist polity. Methodism, which had a fluctuating number of adherents among the visiting military forces at Halifax, had its stronghold in areas settled by British-born colonists, and increased in numbers with the successive waves of Loyalists coming to the province after 1783.2 Methodism was not confined, however, to segregated geographical areas of Nova Scotia. By the early nineteenth century, there were significant Methodist congregations composed primarily of Planters located throughout the Annapolis Valley and along the province's South Shore. Interesting questions are posed for historians when we consider why New Englanders and their descendants were attracted to what appeared to be essentially a foreign hierarchical religious-cultural movement which had broken from 1 Gordon Stewart and George Rawlyk, A People Highly Favoured of God: The Nova Scotia Yankees and the American Revolution (Toronto, 1972); J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware in the American Revolution (2002)
    Delaware in the American Revolution An Exhibition from the Library and Museum Collections of The Society of the Cincinnati Delaware in the American Revolution An Exhibition from the Library and Museum Collections of The Society of the Cincinnati Anderson House Washington, D. C. October 12, 2002 - May 3, 2003 HIS catalogue has been produced in conjunction with the exhibition, Delaware in the American Revolution , on display from October 12, 2002, to May 3, 2003, at Anderson House, THeadquarters, Library and Museum of the Society of the Cincinnati, 2118 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, D. C. 20008. It is the sixth in a series of exhibitions focusing on the contributions to the American Revolution made by the original 13 he season loudly calls for the greatest efforts of every states and the French alliance. Tfriend to his Country. Generous support for this exhibition was provided by the — George Washington, Wilmington, to Caesar Rodney, Delaware State Society of the Cincinnati. August 31, 1777, calling for the assistance of the Delaware militia in rebuffing the British advance to Philadelphia. Collections of the Historical Society of Delaware Also available: Massachusetts in the American Revolution: “Let It Begin Here” (1997) New York in the American Revolution (1998) New Jersey in the American Revolution (1999) Rhode Island in the American Revolution (2000) Connecticut in the American Revolution (2001) Text by Ellen McCallister Clark and Emily L. Schulz. Front cover: Domenick D’Andrea. “The Delaware Regiment at the Battle of Long Island, August 27, 1776.” [detail] Courtesy of the National Guard Bureau. See page 11. ©2002 by The Society of the Cincinnati.
    [Show full text]
  • BROADSIDES the Programs and Catalogues of Brown
    BROADSIDES The programs and catalogues of Brown University are representative of the work of a number of Rhode Island printers, including H.H. Brown (Hugh Hale Brown), Brown and Wilson (Hugh Hale Brown, William H. WIlson), John Carter, Carter and Wilkinson (John Carter, William Wilkinson), Dunham and Hawkins (William H. Dunham, David Hawkins, Jr.), Barnum Field, Field and Maxcy (Barnum Field, Eaton W. Maxcy), Gilbert and Dean ==?== Goddard and Knowles (William G. Goddard, James D. Knowles), Goddard and Mann (William G. Goddard, William M. Mann), J.A. and R.A. Reid (James Allen Reid), Smith and Parmenter (SAmuel J. Smith, Jonathan C. Parmenter); also the Microcosism Office and the American (Rhode Island American?) Office. BR-1F: CATALOGUS Latin catalogue of graduates of the College. The first Catalogus is mentioned in Ezra Stiles' diary. Lists baccalaureate and honorary graduates by year. In later editions, graduates are listed under year alphabetically in two groups, graduates in course and honorary graduates. For the year 1772 only graduates in course appear. At the time of publication of the Historical Catalogue of Brown University, 1764-1894, no copy was known. The copy now in the Archives has been annotated in ink, changing the A.B. after names of 1769 graduates to A.M. Forenames are in Latin form, and in later editions, names of clergy men are in italics, and names of deceased are starred, with a summary at the end. Printed triennially. Second edition in 1775. Evans 16049 and 17347 describe editions of 1778 and 1781, and Alden 756 concludes that these descriptions were by conjecture from the 1775 edition on the assumption that a catalogue was issued every three years, and that no such catalogues were actually printed in those years.
    [Show full text]
  • First Baptist Church in America
    First Baptist Church in America Church Profile, 2014 75 North Main Street Providence, RI 02904 401.454.3415 www.fbcia.org Pastoral Leadership The position of Minister of FBCIA is open following the announced retirement, effective February 28, 2014, of Dr. Dan E. Ivins. Dr. Ivins officially became the 36th minister of this church on December 1, 2006. He began first as the interim minister in February of that year, and as the pastoral search committee labored to find a new settled minister, people began to ask, “Why not Dan?” His great sense of humor and his wonderful preaching captured the hearts of everyone. He was near the end of his ministerial career, having served as the interim at another church in Rhode Island before we hired him. First Baptist Church accepted him with the knowledge that he was closing out his active pastoral ministry. He had to be talked into becoming the settled minister, and he agreed to stay at least three years. He remained with us into his eighth year and has retired at age 70. We are now looking for our 37th minister in a line that runs back to Roger Williams in 1638. We are seeking a servant minister who relishes the opportunity to lead this ancient Baptist church which lives in the heart of Providence, which is not a neighborhood church and whose parish is the state. Church Organization The church staff is composed of the Minister, Associate Minister, Minister of Music, an office-manager/secretary, part-time bookkeeper, full-time sexton and, and a Sunday child-care person.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Documents of the American Revolution
    Naval Documents of The American Revolution Volume 4 AMERICAN THEATRE: Feb. 19, 1776–Apr. 17, 1776 EUROPEAN THEATRE: Feb. 1, 1776–May 25, 1776 AMERICAN THEATRE: Apr. 18, 1776–May 8, 1776 Part 7 of 7 United States Government Printing Office Washington, 1969 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2012 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. MAY 1776 1413 5 May (Sunday) JOURNAL OF H.M. SLOOPHunter, CAPTAINTHOMAS MACKENZIE May 1776 ' Remarks &c in Quebec 1776 Sunday 5 at 5 A M Arrived here his Majestys Sloop surprize at 8 the surprise & Sloop Martin with part of the 29th regt landed with their Marines Light Breezes & fair Sally'd out & drove the rebels off took at different places several pieces of Cannon some Howitzers & a Quantity of Ammunition 1. PRO, Admiralty 511466. JOURNALOF H.M.S. Surprize, CAPTAINROBERT LINZEE May 1776 Runing up the River [St. Lawrence] - Sunday 5. at 4 AM. Weigh'd and came to sail, at 9 Got the Top Chains up, and Slung the yards the Island of Coudre NEBE, & Cape Tor- ment SW1/2W. off Shore 1% Mile. At 10 Came too with the Best Bower in 11 fms. of Water, Veer'd to 1/2 a Cable. at 11 Employ'd racking the Lanyards of the Shrouds, and getting every thing ready for Action. Most part little Wind and Cloudy, Remainder Modre and hazey, at 2 [P.M.] Weigh'd and came to sail, Set Studding sails, nock'd down the Bulk Heads of the Cabbin at 8 PM Came too with the Best Bower in 13 £ms Veer'd to % of a Cable fir'd 19 Guns Signals for the Garrison of Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Constitutionalism: the Myth of Edward Coke and the Virginia Charter*
    Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers 7-2016 Charter Constitutionalism: The yM th of Edward Coke and the Virginia Charter Mary Sarah Bilder Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Legal History Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Mary Sarah Bilder. "Charter Constitutionalism: The yM th of Edward Coke and the Virginia Charter." North Carolina Law Review 94, no.5 (2016): 1545-1598. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 94 N.C. L. REV. 1545 (2016) CHARTER CONSTITUTIONALISM: THE MYTH OF EDWARD COKE AND THE VIRGINIA CHARTER* MARY SARAH BILDER** [A]ll and every the persons being our subjects . and every of their children, which shall happen to be born within . the said several colonies . shall have and enjoy all liberties, franchises and immunities . as if they had been abiding and born, within this our realm of England . .—Virginia Charter (1606)1 Magna Carta’s connection to the American constitutional tradition has been traced to Edward Coke’s insertion of English liberties in the 1606 Virginia Charter. This account curiously turns out to be unsupported by direct evidence. This Article recounts an alternative history of the origins of English liberties in American constitutionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor
    VOLUME I Executive Summary and Main Report Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation January 2004 Disclaimer: This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation solely in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof, nor does it express any opinion whatsoever on the merit or desirability of the project(s) described herein. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Any trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Note: In an effort to better inform the public, this document contains references to a number of Internet web sites. Web site locations change rapidly and, while every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of these references as of the date of publication, the references may prove to be invalid in the future. Should an FRA document prove difficult to find, readers should access the FRA web site (www.fra.dot.gov) and search by the document’s title or subject. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FRA/RDV-04/02 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2004 Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor⎯Volume I 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors: 8. Performing Organization Report No. For the engineering contractor: Michael C. Holowaty, Project Manager For the sponsoring agency: Richard U. Cogswell and Neil E. Moyer 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Pee Dee-Lumber Focus Area Conservation Plan
    Little Pee Dee-Lumber Focus Area Conservation Plan South Carolina Department of Natural Resources February 2017 Little Pee Dee-Lumber Focus Area Conservation Plan Prepared by Lorianne Riggin and Bob Perry1, and Dr. Scott Howard2 February 2017 Acknowledgements The preparers thank the following South Carolina Department of Natural Resources staff for their special expertise and contributions toward the completion of this report: Heritage Trust data base manager Julie Holling; GIS applications manager Tyler Brown for mapping and listing of protected properties; archeologist Sean Taylor for information on cultural resources; fisheries biologists Kevin Kubach, Jason Marsik, and Robert Stroud for information regarding aquatic resources; hydrologist Andy Wachob for information on hydrologic resources; and wildlife biologists James Fowler, Dean Harrigal, Sam Stokes, Jr. and Amy Tegler for information regarding wildlife resources. 1 South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Office of Environmental Programs. 2 South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey. i Little Pee Dee-Lumber Focus Area Conservation Plan The goal of this conservation plan is to provide science-based guidance for future decisions to protect natural resource, riparian corridors and traditional landscape uses such as fish and wildlife management, hunting, fishing, agriculture and forestry. Such planning is valuable in the context of protecting Waters of the United States in accordance with the Clean Water Act, particularly when the interests of economic development and protection of natural and cultural resources collide. Such planning is vital in the absence of specific watershed planning. As additional information is gathered by the focus area partners, and as further landscape-scale conservation goals are achieved, this plan will be updated accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Failure in the Anglo-North Atlantic World, 1570-1640 (2015)
    FINDLEY JR, JAMES WALTER, Ph.D. “Went to Build Castles in the Aire:” Colonial Failure in the Anglo-North Atlantic World, 1570-1640 (2015). Directed by Dr. Phyllis Whitman Hunter. 266pp. This study examines the early phases of Anglo-North American colonization from 1570 to 1640 by employing the lenses of imagination and failure. I argue that English colonial projectors envisioned a North America that existed primarily in their minds – a place filled with marketable and profitable commodities waiting to be extracted. I historicize the imagined profitability of commodities like fish and sassafras, and use the extreme example of the unicorn to highlight and contextualize the unlimited potential that America held in the minds of early-modern projectors. My research on colonial failure encompasses the failure of not just physical colonies, but also the failure to pursue profitable commodities, and the failure to develop successful theories of colonization. After roughly seventy years of experience in America, Anglo projectors reevaluated their modus operandi by studying and drawing lessons from past colonial failure. Projectors learned slowly and marginally, and in some cases, did not seem to learn anything at all. However, the lack of learning the right lessons did not diminish the importance of this early phase of colonization. By exploring the variety, impracticability, and failure of plans for early settlement, this study investigates the persistent search for usefulness of America by Anglo colonial projectors in the face of high rate of
    [Show full text]