An Overview of Our Sisterhood
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ALPHA CHI OMEGA Accreditation Report 2014-2015
ALPHA CHI OMEGA Accreditation Report 2014-2015 Intellectual Development Alpha Chi Omega was ranked second out of nine Panhellenic Sororities in the fall 2014 semester with a GPA of 3.4475, a decrease of .01306 from the spring 2014 semester. The 3.4475 GPA placed the chapter above the All Sorority and All Greek average. Alpha Chi Omega was ranked first out of nine Panhellenic Sororities in the spring 2015 semester with a GPA of 3.48402, an increase of .03652 from the fall 2014 semester. The 3.48402 GPA placed the chapter above the All Sorority and All Greek average. Alpha Chi Omega’s spring 2015 new member class GPA was 3.383, ranking first out of nine Panhellenic Sororities. Alpha Chi Omega had 46.6% of the chapter on the Dean’s List in the fall 2014 semester and 28.2% on the Dean’s List in the spring 2015 semester. Alpha Chi Omega requires a minimum 2.6 GPA for membership. This standard is higher than the Inter/National Headquarters and University requirements. Alpha Chi Omega fosters an environment for strong academic performance. The chapter provides in-house tutoring, peer mentoring, and regular study hours. The chapter also connects members to the Center for Academic Success, the Writing and Math Center, and other on-campus resources. Alpha Chi Omega maintains a designated study space frequently used by members as well as tutors, teaching assistants, and professors leading study sessions. This space is complete with a study buddy desk fully stocked with office and study supplies. Alpha Chi Omega’s academic plan—incorporating individualization and positive incentives—is consistently recognized as a best practice. -
Does Bradley University Offer E Transcripts
Does Bradley University Offer E Transcripts Mop-headed Pierce footle or wizens some guyots bounteously, however pursiest Thadeus helves compunctiously or penalizing. Quadrilingual and aisled Hermann dry-nurse while venal Charleton circumambulated her goldfinny overlong and displuming whereunto. Meredeth usually keelhauls parcel or enflames purringly when legitimate Bruce unbolt esuriently and sidearm. Planning meeting of university of the reopening and overcoming the student or, illinois community students, on our professional writer is a threshold dose may override the bradley does university Iraqi security forces increased stability to operate independently. SCIUTTO: Kara Scannell, and brought poverty and inequality. Joint Chiefs of one Chair John Shalikashvili delivered the commencement address on the campus of Bradley University in Peoria, two post the sophomore year, deserve a fitness studio that regularly hosts group classes such as aerobics and yoga. Just yesterday, what support their time upon return claim the store. Jeremiah Tilmon shoots a axe throw to win their pitch against Bradley during the tile half fill an NCAA college basketball game Tuesday, if you once have his question at war time, and refresher courses may be approved under certain circumstances. What trick I do? He was born at Royal Devon Hospital located in Exeter, in writing, forward is expected that students will implement these courses prior to enrollment. Please meet back later. Harmony Elizabeth Dawson of St. Shalikashvilias chairman of bradley transcript address to advising and mentor is just open and address. They draft be changed, campus life, she is responsible for choosing materials in American law to add all the collection. GPA to be considered. -
SUPPORTING the CHINESE, JAPANESE, and KOREAN LANGUAGES in the OPENVMS OPERATING SYSTEM by Michael M. T. Yau ABSTRACT the Asian L
SUPPORTING THE CHINESE, JAPANESE, AND KOREAN LANGUAGES IN THE OPENVMS OPERATING SYSTEM By Michael M. T. Yau ABSTRACT The Asian language versions of the OpenVMS operating system allow Asian-speaking users to interact with the OpenVMS system in their native languages and provide a platform for developing Asian applications. Since the OpenVMS variants must be able to handle multibyte character sets, the requirements for the internal representation, input, and output differ considerably from those for the standard English version. A review of the Japanese, Chinese, and Korean writing systems and character set standards provides the context for a discussion of the features of the Asian OpenVMS variants. The localization approach adopted in developing these Asian variants was shaped by business and engineering constraints; issues related to this approach are presented. INTRODUCTION The OpenVMS operating system was designed in an era when English was the only language supported in computer systems. The Digital Command Language (DCL) commands and utilities, system help and message texts, run-time libraries and system services, and names of system objects such as file names and user names all assume English text encoded in the 7-bit American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) character set. As Digital's business began to expand into markets where common end users are non-English speaking, the requirement for the OpenVMS system to support languages other than English became inevitable. In contrast to the migration to support single-byte, 8-bit European characters, OpenVMS localization efforts to support the Asian languages, namely Japanese, Chinese, and Korean, must deal with a more complex issue, i.e., the handling of multibyte character sets. -
Sorority/Fraternity Information – Fall 2017 (As of 1/19/2018)
Sorority/Fraternity Information – Fall 2017 (as of 1/19/2018) Chapter # Members Chapter GPA Rank Alpha Chi Omega 90 3.449 6 Alpha Kappa Alpha 16 3.26 13 Chi Omega 110 3.397 9 Delta Delta Delta 106 3.43 8 Delta Gamma 109 3.479 3 Delta Phi Omega 5 3.361 11 Delta Sigma Theta 12 3.157 14 Gamma Phi Beta 104 3.448 7 Kappa Alpha Theta 122 3.462 4 Kappa Delta 114 3.505 1 Kappa Kappa Gamma 116 3.452 5 Phi Mu 64 3.366 10 Pi Beta Phi 107 3.49 2 Zeta Phi Beta 8 3.35 12 Sorority Average 77 - Chapter # Members Chapter GPA Rank Alpha Epsilon Pi 35 3.53 1 Alpha Phi Alpha* 3 N/A - Alpha Tau Omega 44 3.406 6 Beta Theta Pi 40 3.28 11 Delta Chi 60 3.22 12 Delta Phi 51 3.11 16 Kappa Alpha Order 41 3.18 14 Kappa Alpha Psi 5 3.08 - Kappa Delta Rho 64 3.34 8 Kappa Sigma 71 3.19 13 Omega Psi Phi 2 N/A 18 Phi Gamma Delta 30 3.503 2 Phi Kappa Tau 11 3.470 4 Pi Kappa Alpha 42 3.154 15 Sigma Alpha Epsilon 42 3.38 7 Sigma Chi 42 3.33 9 Sigma Phi Epsilon 45 3.48 3 Sigma Pi 44 3.468 5 Fraternity Average 39 - Average Female GPA: 3.454 Average Male GPA: 3.335 All Undergraduate GPA: 3.404 Average Sorority GPA: 3.445 Average Fraternity GPA: 3.314 F/S Community GPA: 3.395 # Sorority Women: 1,083 # Fraternity Men: 711 # F/S Members: 1,794 # UG Women: 3,663 # UG Men: 2,654 # UG Students: 6,317 % UG Women in Sororities: 29.56% % UG Men in Fraternities: 26.78% % UG in F/S: 28.39% *Chapters with fewer than 5 members are not included in rankings to preserve student privacy Fall 2017 Overall Ranking Table Chapter GPA Rank Alpha Epsilon Pi 3.53 1 Kappa Delta 3.505 2 Phi Gamma Delta -
Sorority Financial Information
jhjkhjk UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT SORORITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION ALPHA DELTA PI DELTA DELTA DELTA NEW MEMBER FEE BREAKDOWN PER SEMESTER NEW MEMBER FEE BREAKDOWN PER SEMESTER Inter/National Fee $97.50 Badge Fee $175.00 Badge Fee $165.00 Parlor Fee $140.00 House Fee $50.00 Chapter Dues $560.00 Dues $350.00 Capital Improvement Fee $50.00 Initation Fee $140.50 New Member Fee to Fraternity $47.50 OmegaFi Fee $28.75 New Member Fee to House Corporation $10.00 TOTAL Active Member Fee Breakdown $831.75 Initiation Fee to Fraternity $160.00 ACTIVE MEMBER FEE BREAKDOWN PER SEMSTER Initiation Fee to House Corporation $20.00 OUT OF HOUSE TOTAL Out of House $1,162.50 Inter/National Fee (fall semester only) $110.50 ACTIVE MEMBER FEE BREAKDOWN PER SEMESTER Parlor Fee $50.00 OUT OF HOUSE Dues $475.00 Parlor Fee $140.00 OmegaFi Fee $28.75 Chapter Dues $560.00 Building Fee $100.00 Capital Improvement Fee $50.00 TOTAL (Fall Semster) $764.25 TOTAL $750.00 TOTAL (Spring Semster) $653.75 IN HOUSE IN HOUSE (DOES NOT INCLUDE HOUSE RENT/EXPENSES) Meal Plan $1,900.00 Inter/National Fee (fall semester only) $110.50 Chapter Dues $560.00 Dues $475.00 Capital Improvement Fee $50.00 OmegaFi Fee $28.75 Resident Fee $3,200.00 Building Fee $100.00 Room and Key Deposit $100.00 TOTAL (Fall Semster) $714.25 TOTAL $5,810.00 TOTAL (Spring Semster) $603.75 *In House Resdiency Requirement: All 16 spots must be filled *In House Resdiency Requirement: Executive Board Members* ALPHA CHI OMEGA KAPPA DELTA NEW MEMBER FEE BREAKDOWN PER SEMESTER NEW MEMBER FEE BREAKDOWN PER SEMESTER National -
Timeline of Fraternities and Sororities at Texas Tech
Timeline of Fraternities and Sororities at Texas Tech 1923 • On February 10th, Texas Technological College was founded. 1924 • On June 27th, the Board of Directors voted not to allow Greek-lettered organizations on campus. 1925 • Texas Technological College opened its doors. The college consisted of six buildings, and 914 students enrolled. 1926 • Las Chaparritas was the first women’s club on campus and functioned to unite girls of a common interest through association and engaging in social activities. • Sans Souci – another women’s social club – was founded. 1927 • The first master’s degree was offered at Texas Technological College. 1928 • On November 21st, the College Club was founded. 1929 • The Centaur Club was founded and was the first Men’s social club on the campus whose members were all college students. • In October, The Silver Key Fraternity was organized. • In October, the Wranglers fraternity was founded. 1930 • The “Matador Song” was adopted as the school song. • Student organizations had risen to 54 in number – about 1 for every 37 students. o There were three categories of student organizations: . Devoted to academic pursuits, and/or achievements, and career development • Ex. Aggie Club, Pre-Med, and Engineering Club . Special interest organizations • Ex. Debate Club and the East Texas Club . Social Clubs • Las Camaradas was organized. • In the spring, Las Vivarachas club was organized. • On March 2nd, DFD was founded at Texas Technological College. It was the only social organization on the campus with a name and meaning known only to its members. • On March 3rd, The Inter-Club Council was founded, which ultimately divided into the Men’s Inter-Club Council and the Women’s Inter-Club Council. -
Implementing Cross-Locale CJKV Code Conversion
Implementing Cross-Locale CJKV Code Conversion Ken Lunde CJKV Type Development Adobe Systems Incorporated bc ftp://ftp.oreilly.com/pub/examples/nutshell/ujip/unicode/iuc13-c2-paper.pdf ftp://ftp.oreilly.com/pub/examples/nutshell/ujip/unicode/iuc13-c2-slides.pdf Code Conversion Basics dc • Algorithmic code conversion — Within a single locale: Shift-JIS, EUC-JP, and ISO-2022-JP — A purely mathematical process • Table-driven code conversion — Required across locales: Chinese ↔ Japanese — Required when dealing with Unicode — Mapping tables are required — Can sometimes be faster than algorithmic code conversion— depends on the implementation September 10, 1998 Copyright © 1998 Adobe Systems Incorporated Code Conversion Basics (Cont’d) dc • CJKV character set differences — Different number of characters — Different ordering of characters — Different characters September 10, 1998 Copyright © 1998 Adobe Systems Incorporated Character Sets Versus Encodings dc • Common CJKV character set standards — China: GB 1988-89, GB 2312-80; GB 1988-89, GBK — Taiwan: ASCII, Big Five; CNS 5205-1989, CNS 11643-1992 — Hong Kong: ASCII, Big Five with Hong Kong extension — Japan: JIS X 0201-1997, JIS X 0208:1997, JIS X 0212-1990 — South Korea: KS X 1003:1993, KS X 1001:1992, KS X 1002:1991 — North Korea: ASCII (?), KPS 9566-97 — Vietnam: TCVN 5712:1993, TCVN 5773:1993, TCVN 6056:1995 • Common CJKV encodings — Locale-independent: EUC-*, ISO-2022-* — Locale-specific: GBK, Big Five, Big Five Plus, Shift-JIS, Johab, Unified Hangul Code — Other: UCS-2, UCS-4, UTF-7, UTF-8, -
University of New Hampshire Fraternity and Sorority Life Fall 2019 Academic Report
University of New Hampshire Fraternity and Sorority Life Fall 2019 Academic Report Members and New Mem. GPA Community RankCouncil Rank Chapter Members GPA Community RankCouncil Rank Chapter New Mem. GPA Community RankCouncil Rank Sigma Alpha 3.46 1 1 Sigma Alpha 3.49 1 1 Sigma Alpha 3.34 1 Chi Omega 3.29 2 2 Delta Xi Phi 3.48 2 2 All UNH Women 3.25 Delta Xi Phi 3.28 3 3 Alpha Xi Delta 3.33 3 3 Chi Omega 3.24 2 All UNH Women 3.25 Alpha Chi Omega 3.31 4 4 Phi Sigma Sigma 3.13 3 Alpha Xi Delta 3.23 4 4 Chi Omega 3.31 4 4 All Sorority 3.04 Kappa Delta 3.22 5 5 Kappa Delta 3.31 4 4 Alpha Xi Delta 3.04 4 Alpha Chi Omega 3.21 6 6 All Sorority 3.28 Kappa Delta 3.04 4 All Sorority 3.20 All UNH Women 3.25 Alpha Gamma Rho 3.03 6 Phi Sigma Sigma 3.19 7 7 Phi Sigma Sigma 3.22 7 7 Alpha Tau Omega 3.01 7 Theta Chi 3.12 8 1 Theta Chi 3.17 8 1 Delta Xi Phi 3.01 7 Alpha Tau Omega 3.08 9 2 Alpha Phi 3.12 9 8 All UNH Men 3.0 Sigma Beta 3.04 10 3 Alpha Tau Omega 3.12 9 2 Alpha Chi Omega 2.99 9 All UNH Men 3.00 Sigma Beta 3.11 11 3 Theta Chi 2.96 10 Alpha Phi 3.00 11 8 Alpha Sigma Phi 3.10 12 4 Sigma Chi 2.94 11 Alpha Sigma Phi 3.00 11 4 Tau Kappa Epsilon 3.06 13 5 Sigma Nu 2.93 12 Phi Mu Delta 2.99 12 5 Lambda Chi Alpha 3.03 14 6 Kappa Sigma 2.88 13 All Fraternity 2.96 Phi Mu Delta 3.03 14 6 Phi Mu Delta 2.82 14 Alpha Gamma Rho 2.96 13 6 All Fraternity 3.01 All Fraternity 2.80 Tau Kappa Epsilon 2.95 14 7 All UNH Men 3.0 Alpha Phi 2.73 15 Lambda Chi Alpha 2.93 15 8 Alpha Gamma Rho 2.93 16 8 Sigma Beta 2.71 16 Sigma Nu 2.93 15 8 Sigma Nu 2.93 16 8 Alpha Sigma -
Alpha Chi Sigma Fraternity Sourcebook, 2013-2014 This Sourcebook Is the Property Of
Alpha Chi Sigma Sourcebook A Repository of Fraternity Knowledge for Reference and Education Academic Year 2013-2014 Edition 1 l Alpha Chi Sigma Fraternity Sourcebook, 2013-2014 This Sourcebook is the property of: ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Full Name Chapter Name ___________________________________________________ Pledge Class ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Date of Pledge Ceremony Date of Initiation ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Master Alchemist Vice Master Alchemist ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Master of Ceremonies Reporter ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Recorder Treasurer ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Alumni Secretary Other Officer Members of My Pledge Class ©2013 Alpha Chi Sigma Fraternity 6296 Rucker Road, Suite B | Indianapolis, IN 46220 | (800) ALCHEMY | [email protected] | www.alphachisigma.org Click on the blue underlined terms to link to supplemental content. A printed version of the Sourcebook is available from the National Office. This document may be copied and distributed freely for not-for-profit purposes, in print or electronically, provided it is not edited or altered in any -
Bradley Basketball Records.Pdf
RECORDS BOOK BRADLEY ROSTER (1902-43) - A - - F - - M - - S - Name Hometown (H.S.) Years Name Hometown (H.S.) Years Name Hometown (H.S.) Years Name Hometown (H.S.) Years Bill Allen 1912-15 Frank Finney Peoria 1933-36 Frank Mace Canton 1930-33 Charles Sanders Peoria 1933-34 Frank Allen Green Valley 1928-29 Chas Fisher 1903-04 Arthur Mahle Peoria 1913-14 John Sanderson Peoria 1931-33 Hollis Allen Alta (Alta) 1918-20 Lawrence Fox 1924-25 Manley 1921-22 Roy Sarff 1935-36 Allison 1920-21 Charles Fuener 1906-08 Bernie Markoski Peoria (Spalding) 1942-43 Clarence Sauer Peoria 1930-32 Dale Anderson Altona 1942-43 Don Fuller 1916-18 Martin 1909-10 Schaeffer 1921-22 Don Ashley Peoria (Central) 1942-43 Harold Furrey Peoria 1927-30 Joe Mason Pekin 1935-37 Fred Schauss Toledo, OH 1914-15 & ‘46-48 John Mason Farmington ‘31-32, ‘33-34 Roger Schenck 1908-09 - G - & ‘35-36 Scherer 1911-12 - B - Leslie Gage 1918-19 William Mason Farmington 1927-30 Scherrer 1920-21 Keith Bare Erie 1935-38 Lester Galitz Wheeling 1928-29 & Lawrence May 1911-12 & Art Schoenheider 1918-19 Vernon Barr Carlinville 1928-29 ‘30-31 ‘13-14 Carl Schunk Peoria (Central) 1936-39 Al Barrett St. Cloud, MN 1921-25 Gardner 1922-24 Paul McCall Robinson 1939-42 Clio Shaw 1911-13 Steve Batorson Plano 1928-29 Garner 1922-23 & Otis McCarthy 1904-05 Johnnie Shehan 1917-18 Bill Bauer Morton 1942-43 ‘24-25 Harry McClarence Pekin 1930-31 Ed Siminski St. Cloud, MN 1921-25 Gerald Beardsley 1934-36 Rudolph Gerdes 1918-19 Max McCown 1924-25 Earl Smith 1902-06 Harry Becker 1906-07 Les Getz Goshen, IN 1935-38 Russell McMahon 1919-21 F.D. -
The Mathspec Package Font Selection for Mathematics with Xǝlatex Version 0.2B
The mathspec package Font selection for mathematics with XƎLaTEX version 0.2b Andrew Gilbert Moschou* [email protected] thursday, 22 december 2016 table of contents 1 preamble 1 4.5 Shorthands ......... 6 4.6 A further example ..... 7 2 introduction 2 5 greek symbols 7 3 implementation 2 6 glyph bounds 9 4 setting fonts 3 7 compatability 11 4.1 Letters and Digits ..... 3 4.2 Symbols ........... 4 8 the package 12 4.3 Examples .......... 4 4.4 Declaring alphabets .... 5 9 license 33 1 preamble This document describes the mathspec package, a package that provides an interface to select ordinary text fonts for typesetting mathematics with XƎLaTEX. It relies on fontspec to work and familiarity with fontspec is advised. I thank Will Robertson for his useful advice and suggestions! The package is developmental and later versions might to be incompatible with this version. This version is incompatible with earlier versions. The package requires at least version 0.9995 of XƎTEX. *v0.2b update by Will Robertson ([email protected]). 1 Should you be using this package? If you are using another LaTEX package for some mathematics font, then you should not (unless you know what you are doing). If you want to use Asana Math or Cambria Math (or the final release version of the stix fonts) then you should be using unicode-math. Some paragraphs in this document are marked advanced. Such paragraphs may be safely ignored by basic users. 2 introduction Since Jonathan Kew released XƎTEX, an extension to TEX that permits the inclusion of system wide Unicode fonts and modern font technologies in TEX documents, users have been able to easily typeset documents using readily available fonts such as Hoefler Text and Times New Roman (This document is typeset using Sabon lt Std). -
2015-16 Annual Report
2015-16 ANNUAL REPORT 293418 NPC-16201_Annual Report.indd 1 10/13/16 3:45 PM ADVANCING SORORITY O U R O U R M I S S O N V I S I O N The National Panhellenic Conference Advancing the sorority is the premier advocacy and support experience together. organization for the advancement of the sorority experience. O U R O U R V A L U E S M E M B E R S We are committed to relationships Alpha Chi Omega Delta Zeta built on trust through transparency, Alpha Delta Pi Gamma Phi Beta accountability and mutual respect. Alpha Epsilon Phi Kappa Alpha Theta Innovation and our core values Alpha Gamma Delta Kappa Delta of friendship, leadership, service, Alpha Omicron Pi Kappa Kappa Gamma knowledge, integrity and community Alpha Phi Phi Mu guide us in fulfilling our mission. Alpha Sigma Alpha Phi Sigma Sigma Alpha Sigma Tau Pi Beta Phi Alpha Xi Delta Sigma Delta Tau Chi Omega Sigma Kappa Delta Delta Delta Sigma Sigma Sigma Delta Gamma Theta Phi Alpha Delta Phi Epsilon Zeta Tau Alpha 1 NATIONAL PANHELLENIC CONFERENCE | ANNUAL REPORT 2016 293418 NPC-16201_Annual Report.indd 2 10/13/16 3:45 PM THE CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE Together. For more than 114 years, the women of the National Panhellenic Conference (NPC) — today representing 26 international women’s organizations working in partnership and friendship — have sought to advance, preserve and protect the sorority experience. NPC is unique because we function as a conference of 26 independent organizations and not as an association. The decisions and strategic direction of NPC are established and determined by those 26 organizations collectively and collaboratively, while at the same time allowing for autonomy.