DOCSLIB.ORG

Project 142 - CSE 4 (2Nd BG-GR Interconnector and South BG Corridor)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project 142 - CSE 4 (2Nd BG-GR Interconnector and South BG Corridor) Project 142 - CSE 4 (2nd BG-GR interconnector and South BG corridor) The project concerns the construction of a new AC 400kV interconnection between Bulgaria and Greece and new AC 400kV overhead linesat the south part of Bulgaria. This project will increase cross border transfer capacity between Bulgaria and Greece and contribute to the safe evacuation of renewable power in the area. Classification Mid-term Project Boundary North-South PCI label 3.7.11 Promoted by ESO;IPTO-SA Investments GTC Evolution Investment Contribution Substation Substation Present Commissioning since Description Evolution Driver ID 1 2 Status Date TYNDP 2014 New interconnection line Maritsa BG-GR by a 130km N.Santa Delayed due to lack of 256 100% East 1 Permitting 2021 Delayed single circuit 400kV OHL. (GR) funding. (BG) New 100km single circuit Maritsa Delayed due to difficulties 400kV OHL in parallel to Plovdiv Design & 257 100% East 1 2019 Delayed with the acquisition of the the existing one. (BG) Permitting (BG) land New 13km single circuit Maritsa Maritsa Delayed due to difficulties 400kV OHL in parallel to Design & 258 100% East 1 East 3 2017 Delayed with the acquisition of the the existing one. Permitting (BG) (BG) land New 400kV OHL. Line Maritsa Delayed due to difficulties Burgas Design & 262 length 150km. 100% East 1 2021 Delayed with the acquisition of the (BG) Permitting (BG) land Additional Information - Project website ESO (http://projects.eso.bg/maritsa-east-nea- santa/?en#PROJECT%20OF%20COMMON%20INTEREST) - Project website IPTO (http://www.admie.gr/en/transmission-system/system-development/projects-of-common- interest/project/article/2194/) Project 142 includes a new interconnection between Bulgaria and Greece and relevant reinforcements in the 400kV network at the south part of Bulgaria. The later are necessary in order to alleviate congestions in the area of south Bulgaria that are restricting power exchanges through the new interconnector. Investment needs The project 142 aims to increase the transfer capacity in the predominant North-South direction by the construction of a new interconnector between BG and GR and specific enhancements in the South part of the 400kV Bulgarian transmission system. Project will increase transmission capacity in range of 660-870 MW for dominant direction from north (RO+BG) to south (GR), or in average for 80%. GTC on the boundary considered will reach up to 1000 MW in 2030. In opposite direction, GTC increase is in range 0-400 MW, or in average for 30%. GTC on the boundary considered will reach up to 650 MW in 2030. Project 142 support market integration in mid-term, 2020EP, and brings significant benefit to SEW of near 30 MEUR. On a long-term, largest benefits on SEW appear mainly in Vision 2, as can be seen in the Figure below that depicts SeW:ΔGTC ratios for the 2030 Visions. Project Cost Benefit Analysis This project has been assessed by ENTSO-E in line with the Cost Benefit Analysis methodology, approved by the EC in February 2015. The indicators B6/B7 reflect particular technical system aspects of projects based on a summation of qualitative performance indicators, in line with the CBA methodology; these cannot be used as a proxy for the security of supply indicator. The assessment of losses variations induced by the projects improved in the TYNDP 2016 compared to the TYNDP 2014 with a comprehensive all year round computations on a wide-area model capturing all relevant flows. The results must however be considered with caution and not totally reliable due to their very high sensitivity to assumptions regarding the detailed location of generation which are not secured. General CBA Indicators Delta GTC contribution (2020) [MW] GR-RO,BG: 0 RO,BG-GR: 650 Delta GTC contribution (2030) [MW] GR-RO,BG: 400 RO,BG-GR: 850 Capex Costs 2015 (M€) 188.2 ±10 Source: Project Promoter Here are given estimated CAPEX for investments clusterd in the project 142: Investment 256: 400 kV OHL Maritsa East 1 (BG) - Nea Santa (GR) : 66.2 MEUR Investment 257: 400 kV OHL Maritsa East 1(BG) - Plovdiv (BG): 46 MEUR Investment 258: 400 kV OHL Martitsa East 1(BG)- Maritsa East 3 (BG): 11 MEUR Cost explanation Investment 262: 400 kV OHL Maritsa East 1 (BG) - Burgas (BG): 65 MEUR OPEX are not inlcuded in the listed costs. OHL costs deviate depending on terrain, while SS costs vary depending on arrangement of bubars and switchyards. Uncertainty ranges about 10% of CAPEX. S1 15-50km S2 Negligible or less than 15km B6 + B7 ++ Scenario specific CBA indicators EP2020 Vision 1 Vision 2 Vision 3 Vision 4 B1 SoS (MWh/yr) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A B2 SEW (MEuros/yr) 30 ±10 20 ±10 30 ±10 <10 10 ±10 B3 RES integration (GWh/yr) <10 <10 <10 30 ±10 80 ±20 B4 Losses (GWh/yr) 0 ±25 0 ±25 -75 ±25 -175 ±25 0 ±25 B4 Losses (Meuros/yr) 0 ±1 0 ±1 -4 ±2 -11 ±2 0 ±2 B5 CO2 Emissions (kT/year) 500 ±80 400 ±100 400 ±100 ±100 ±100 All the projects of CSE Region contribute to the reduction of generation cost in Europe that is reflected in SeW values for the examined scenarios. In EP2020, Vision 1 and Vision 2, transfer capacity increase brought by new projects, assists market integration internally in the Region and with the rest of Europe. SeW is created due to the capability to increase the generation of low cost thermal production in the Balkan peninsula with an associated increase in CO2 emissions. In Visions 3 and 4, SeW is created mainly because of the increased RES penetration brought by new projects and is accompanied by a corresponding CO2 reduction..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: BULGARIA October 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Bulgaria (Republika Bŭlgariya). Short Form: Bulgaria. Term for Citizens(s): Bulgarian(s). Capital: Sofia. Click to Enlarge Image Other Major Cities (in order of population): Plovdiv, Varna, Burgas, Ruse, Stara Zagora, Pleven, and Sliven. Independence: Bulgaria recognizes its independence day as September 22, 1908, when the Kingdom of Bulgaria declared its independence from the Ottoman Empire. Public Holidays: Bulgaria celebrates the following national holidays: New Year’s (January 1); National Day (March 3); Orthodox Easter (variable date in April or early May); Labor Day (May 1); St. George’s Day or Army Day (May 6); Education Day (May 24); Unification Day (September 6); Independence Day (September 22); Leaders of the Bulgarian Revival Day (November 1); and Christmas (December 24–26). Flag: The flag of Bulgaria has three equal horizontal stripes of white (top), green, and red. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early Settlement and Empire: According to archaeologists, present-day Bulgaria first attracted human settlement as early as the Neolithic Age, about 5000 B.C. The first known civilization in the region was that of the Thracians, whose culture reached a peak in the sixth century B.C. Because of disunity, in the ensuing centuries Thracian territory was occupied successively by the Greeks, Persians, Macedonians, and Romans. A Thracian kingdom still existed under the Roman Empire until the first century A.D., when Thrace was incorporated into the empire, and Serditsa was established as a trading center on the site of the modern Bulgarian capital, Sofia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maritsa River
    TRANSBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS Text of the intervention made by Mr. Yaşar Yakış Former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey During the INBO Conference Istanbul, 18 October 2012 TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Cooperation projects with Greece and Bulgaria ‐ Obligations under the EU acquis communautaire ‐ Need for trilateral cooperation ‐ Turkey and the Euphrates‐Tigris Basin ‐ Conclusion TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Cooperation projects with Greece and Bulgaria ‐ Obligations under the EU acquis communautaire ‐ Need for trilateral cooperation ‐ Turkey and the Euphrates‐Tigris Basin ‐ Conclusion TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Cooperation projects with Greece and Bulgaria ‐ Obligations under the EU acquis communautaire ‐ Need for trilateral cooperation ‐ Turkey and the Euphrates‐Tigris Basin ‐ Conclusion TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ 480 km long ‐ Tundzha, Arda, Ergene ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Cooperation projects with Greece and Bulgaria ‐ Obligations under the EU acquis communautaire ‐ Need for trilateral cooperation ‐ Turkey and the Euphrates‐Tigris Basin ‐ Conclusion TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Flood potential
    [Show full text]
  • Resorts; Relocation of the RES Generation Towards the Inland; Increased Transit and Loop Flows of Electricity Through the Bulgarian Electricity Transmission Network
    “Electricity System Operator” EAD State and Prospects for Development of the Bulgarian Electrical Power System Ventsislav Zahov, Head of Electrical Regimes Dept. at the National Dispatching Center The Bulgarian ELECTRICITY SYSTEM OPERATOR company performs the control of the national electrical power system, the common parallel operation with the power systems of the other ENTSO-E Member parties, provides the operation, the maintenance and the development of the electricity transmission network and administrates the electricity market 2 Electricity generation in Bulgaria during the last years Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Generation, GWh 43 093 44 831 42 573 46 260 50 700 47 195 43 649 47 408 49 233 Demand, GWh 35 555 36 390 34 842 36 647 38 589 37 510 36 381 37 069 37 958 Export, GWh 7 538 8 441 7 731 9 613 12 111 10 660 6 225 9 525 10 538 3 Share of the power plants in the electricity generation in 2015 Type of generation GWh NPP 15 381 Lignite TPP 21 736 Hard coal TPP 971 Gas TPP 1 867 Pumped storage 509 HPP 5 704 Wind farm 1 468 Photovoltaics 1 391 Biomass 206 Total: 49 233 4 Installed capacities by the end of 2015 Type of generation MW NPP 2000 Lignite TPP 4199 Hard coal TPP 708 Gas TPP 799 HPP 3198 Wind farm 702 Photovoltaics 1041 Biomass 64 Total: 12711 5 Registered limit values of the load during the last years Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 (by May) Regime Max. Min. Max.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology of Maritsa and Tundzha
    Hydrology of Maritsa and Tundzha The Maritsa/Meric River is the biggest river on the Balkan peninsular. Maritsa catchment is densely populated, highly industrialized and has intensive agriculture. The biggest cities are Plovdiv on the Bulgarian territory, with 650.000 citizens, and Edirne on the Turkish territory, with 231 000 citizens. The biggest tributaries are Tundzha and Arda Rivers, joining Maritsa at Edirne. Within Maritza and Tundja basin, a significant number of reservoirs and cascades were constructed for irrigation purposes, and for Hydro electricity production. The climatic and geographical characteristics of Maritsa and Tundja River Basins lead to specific run-off conditions: flash floods, high inter-annual variability, heavy soil erosion reducing the reservoirs' capacities through sedimentation, etc. The destructive forces of climatic hazards, manifesting themselves in the form of rainstorms, severe thunderstorms, intensive snowmelt, floods and droughts, appear to increase during recent years. After more than 20 years of relative minor floods during wet seasons, large floods started to occur more often since the end of the 90’s. Theses years of absence of large floods resulted in negligence of political action and financial investment for structural and non-structural flood mitigation measures and maintenance of the river bed and its embankments. 1 The morphology of both river systems is somewhat similar: Maritza flows between Pazarjik to Parvomay in a large flat plain where flood expansion would be very large if no dike contained the flows. However these dikes are not very well maintained out of the main cities, which actually protect them in a certain way ; In 2005 the large inundation upstream Plovdiv certainly prevented Maritza from overtopping the dikes in the city ! Downstream Parvomay, the relief becomes more hilly and the flood plains are more reduced in size until the Greek-Turkish borders where the plain becomes again wide and flat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political, Economic and Cultural Influences of Neo-Ottomanism in Post-Yugoslavian Countries
    POLSKA AKADEMIA UMIEJĘTNOŚCI TOM XXVI STUDIA ŚRODKOWOEUROPEJSKIE I BAŁKANISTYCZNE 2017 DOI 10.4467/2543733XSSB.17.026.8324 DANUTA GIBAS-KRZAK Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa THE POLITICAL, ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL INFLUENCES OF NEO-OTTOMANISM IN POST-YUGOSLAVIAN COUNTRIES. AN ANALYSIS ILLUSTRATED WITH SELECTED EXAMPLES Key words: neo-Ottomanism, Islamic terrorism, Turkish policy, post-Yugoslavian countries, religious fundamentalism, the Balkans, economic influence, Islamization. An ideology of neo-Ottomanism, which has become part of the Turkish foreign policy in the 21st century, dates back to the period of the rule of the Ottomans in the Balkans. However, it is difficult to distinguish Islamization from the influence of Turkish factors, but other Muslim countries are also active in the Balkans, for example, Saudi Arabia or Iran. In the 21st century, Muslim inspirations in many areas of life are noticed in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia (and in the strict sense in Bulgaria and Greece). The goal of this analysis was to show expansion of Turkish policy, defined as neo- -Ottomanism, in post-Yugoslavian countries, and its effect in the spheres of political, economic and cultural life. Therefore, the following question must be asked: do Turkish influences contribute to the specific culture of European Islam, of which goal, despite pre- vailing Islamophobia, is to disseminate ideals of tolerance between nations and religions? Does the Turkish capital contribute only to the economic development of post-Yugoslavi- an countries through investments? On the other hand, the reactivation of neo-Ottomanism may contribute to the development of radical tendencies, including religious fundamen- talism, which is, in many aspects, pose a threat to post-Yugoslavian countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Forecasting System for the Maritsa and Tundzha Rivers
    Flood forecasting system for the Maritsa and Tundzha Rivers Arne Roelevink1, Job Udo1, Georgy Koshinchanov2, Snezhanka Balabanova2 1HKV Consultants, Lelystad, The Netherlands 2National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology, Sofia, Bulgaria Abstract Climatic and geographical characteristics of Maritsa and Tundzha River Basins lead to specific run- off conditions, which can result in extreme floods downstream, as occurred in August 2005 and March 2006. To improve the management of flood hazards, a flood forecasting system (FFS) was set up. This paper describes a forecasting system recently developed in cooperation with the National Institute for Hydrology and Meteorology (NIHM) and the East Aegean River Basin Directorate (EARBD) for the rivers Maritsa and Tundzha. The system exits of two model concepts: i) a numerical, calibrated model consisting of a hydrological part (MIKE11-NAM) and hydraulic part (MIKE11-HD) and ii) a flood forecasting system. For some basins both meteorological and discharge measurements are available. These basins are calibrated individually. The hydraulic models are calibrated based on the 2005 and 2006 floods. The hydrological and hydraulic models are combined and calibrated again. The flood forecasting system (using MIKE-Flood Watch) uses the combined calibrated hydrological and hydraulic models and produces forecasted water levels and alerts at predefined control points. The system uses the following input: • Calculated and measured water levels; • Calculated and measured river discharges; • Measured meteorological data; • Forecasted meteorological data (based on Aladin radar grid). Depending on the available input the forecast lead-time is short but accurate, or long but less accurate. If one of the input data sources is not available the system automatically uses second or third order data, which makes it extremely robust.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrological Modeling of the High Flow in Maritza River Basin in August 2005 Analysis of the Influence of the Topolnitza Reservoir
    HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE HIGH FLOW IN MARITZA RIVER BASIN IN AUGUST 2005 ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF THE TOPOLNITZA RESERVOIR Eram Artinian National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology of Bulgaria – regional centre Plovdiv [email protected] Abstract High waters that streamed down the beds of nearly all rivers of Maritza river basin and especially down the bed of Topolnitza river from the fourth till the seventh day of August 2005 were an event of major influence upon all aspects of life in this region of Bulgaria. They were caused by the extreme amount of rainfall in the areas of Ihtiman, Kostenets, Dolna Banya etc., in the North-West part of the river basin on the fourth and the fifth day of August and in the Rhodopy and the Gornotrakiyska valley regions on the following days. The high water stream itself caused overflow of the rivers Mativir, Topolnitza and Maritza in a number of areas downstream of their river beds and caused substantial material damages and even took away a human life. In the Rhodopi region, the waters of Chepinska, Cherna, Shirokolashka and Chepelarska rivers also caused substantial disruption of their river banks. Supporting walls and other items of infrastructure were pulled down at many places. Large areas of road covering sank down. Considerable material damages were caused in the towns of Smolyan, Velingrad and Chepelare. To find the numerical expression of the approximate flow in the river network near the city of Plovdiv for the purposes of this research, the physical processes in the ground layer of the atmosphere, in the ground – under ground combination and in the river network for the period from the first till the tenth of August were simulated.
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRIBUTION and DENSITY of COYPU (MYOCASTOR COYPUS (MOLINA, 1782)) in DOWNSTREAM of MARITSA RIVER SOUTHEAST BULGARIA Abstract
    FORESTRY IDEAS, 2017, vol. 23, No 1 (53): 77–81 DISTRIBUTION AND DENSITY OF COYPU (MYOCASTOR COYPUS (MOLINA, 1782)) IN DOWNSTREAM OF MARITSA RIVER SOUTHEAST BULGARIA Gradimir Gruychev Department of Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry, University of Forestry, 10 Kliment Ohridski Blvd., 1797 Sofia, Bulgaria. E-mail: [email protected] Received: 31 March 2017 Accepted: 05 June 2017 Abstract The distribution and density of Coypu were researched in the downstream of the Maritsa River. Twenty-four new localities were found, twenty of them are situated along the Maritsa River. Three more new localities were found in ponds near the researched area. The average density was 3.4±2.3 (0–8 ind./9.6 km) – 0.35 ind./km. The average size of the social groups was 1.6±0.9 (1–4 ind.; n=42) from the Maritsa River and 2.4±0.99 (1–4 ind.; n=12) in the other three new lo- calities in the ponds. An invasion of Coypu in the downstream of the Maritsa River is observed. Key words: aquatic habitat, aquatic rodents, density, invasion species, nutria, size of social groups. Introduction 1991, Herrero and Couto 2002, Carter and Leonard 2002). During the period The Coypu (Myocastor coypus (Molina, 1948–1968 Nutria is established outside 1782)) is a large semi-aquatic rodent in farms in Greece (Aliev 1967). Subse- that lives along rivers, lakes, marshes, quently, there are numerous sights of the and other wetlands. Coypu is native in species in the wild in northern Greece South America, but is tolerant to different (Mitchell-Jones et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Falling Like an Autumn Leaf”: the Historical Visions of the Battle of the Maritsa/Meriç River and the Quest for a Place Called Sirp Sindiği
    FALLING LIKE AN AUTUMN LEAF”: THE HISTORICAL VISIONS OF THE BATTLE OF THE MARITSA/MERIÇ RIVER AND THE QUEST FOR A PLACE CALLED SIRP SINDIĞI by ALEKSANDAR ŠOPOV Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University August 2007 © Aleksandar Šopov, 2007 All Rights Reserved Во сеќавање на мојот татко Владимир Шопов и на Душанка Бојаниќ Лукач iv ABSTRACT “FALLING LIKE AN AUTUMN LEAF”: THE HISTORICAL VISIONS OF THE BATTLE OF THE MARITSA/MERIÇ RIVER AND THE QUEST FOR A PLACE CALLED SIRPSINDIĞI Aleksandar Šopov History, MA Thesis, 2006 Thesis Supervisor: Yusuf Hakan Erdem Keywords: maritsa, battle, sırpsındığı, historiography This work is centered around the accounts narrating the Battle of the Maritsa/Meriç River (1371). Also known in the Turkish historiography as the Sırpsındığı Zaferi this Ottoman victory over a coalition of South-East European rulers (King Vukašin and Despot Uglješa) in the vicinity of Edirne is referred to in the historiographies in the region as an event that initiated the Ottoman conquest of the Balkans. The following study will offer a broad discussion on the sources as well as studies referring to early Ottoman history and the Battle of the Maritsa River. My intention is to bring attention to the great variety of versions that narrate the event. I will discuss how the authors constructed all these visions on the memorable event. By comparing Ottoman, Slavic, Greek and western sources I will discuss how these accounts came into being, the chronology they use, their imagination of the battlefield etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Regions and Climate Change Policies
    Industrial regions and climate change policies ___________ Reference document for the region of Stara Zagora (Bulgaria) Author: Marcel Spatari (Syndex Consulting SRL) Industrial regions and climate change policies Methodology The present study has been drawn up on the basis of the analysis, compilation and comparison of data which are essentially in the public domain. It is supplemented by material from interviews conducted with the local and regional social and economic players. We would like to thank the representatives of the companies and trade unions who assisted us in the preparation of this report with their valuable input: Dipl. Eng. Dimitar Cholakov, Deputy Executive Director, Mini Maritsa Iztok EAD Plamen Nikolov, Msc, Deputy Operational Manager, TPP Maritsa East 2 EAD Eng. Aleksandar Zagorov, Confederal secretary, Podkrepa Confederation of Labour Dipl. eng. Valentin Valchev, President, Federation of the Independent Trade Union of Miners, KNSB – CITUB This report is drafted for the workshop in Stara Zagora on April 14, 2016. 2 Industrial regions and climate change policies Summary 1. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE REGION OF STARA ZAGORA AND PRESENTATION OF THE MARITSA IZTOK COMPLEX ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2. ECONOMY ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forth List of Projects of Common Interest with Bulgarian Participation
    Forth List of Projects of Common Interest with Bulgarian participation The projects with Bulgarian participation, included in the Forth list of projects of common interest, are part of two European priority corridors for trans-European energy infrastructure: Priority Corridor North-South Electricity Interconnections in Central Eastern and South Europe (“NSI East Electricity”) including the following: ELECTRICITY PROJECTS 3.7 Cluster Bulgaria—Greece between Maritsa East 1 and N. Santa and the necessary internal reinforcements in Bulgaria, including the following PCIs: 3.7.1 Interconnection between s/s Maritsa East 1 (BG) and s/s N. Santa (EL) TSO EAD is the promoter of the project. Updated information of the project status can be found here… 3.7.2 Internal line between s/s Maritsa East 1 and s/s Plovdiv TSO EAD is the promoter of the project. Updated information of the project status can be found here… 3.7.3 Internal line between s/s Maritsa East 1 and s/y Maritsa East 3 TSO EAD is the promoter of the project. Updated information of the project status can be found here… 3.7.4 Internal line between s/s Maritsa East 1 and s/s Burgas TSO EAD is the promoter of the project. Updated information of the project status can be found here… 3.8 Cluster Bulgaria — Romania capacity increase (currently known as “Black Sea Corridor”), including the following PCI for Bulgaria: 3.8.1 Internal line between s/s Dobrudja and s/s Burgas TSO EAD is the promoter of the project. Updated information of the project status can be found here… 3.23 Hydro-pumped electricity storage in Yadenitsa NEK EAD is the promoter of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • EIAR Non-Technical Summary
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT ON INVESTMENT PROPOSAL FOR “CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 400 KV POWER LINE FROM SUBSTATION “PLOVDIV” 400 KV TO SUBSTATION “BURGAS” 400 KV WITH A BREAK IN SUBSTATION “MARITSA EAST” 400 KV, AND A NEW POWER LINE FROM SUBSTATION “MARITSA EAST” 400 KV TO THE SWITCHYARD OF TPP “MARITSA EAST 3” Non-Technical Summary (in compliance with the Environmental Protection Act, amended SG 62 of 14 August 2015 and the Ordinance on the conditions and procedures for environmental impact assessment, amended SG 94 of 30 November 2012) Investor: Electricity System Operator ЕАD Employer: Elektroenergien Sistemen Operator EAD Sofia 2015 Contents 1. Annotation of the investment proposal for the construction, activities and technologies............3 1.1. Location ........................................................................................................................................4 1.2. Characteristics of the investment proposal..................................................................................8 1.3. Characteristics of the territory - type and way of land use .........................................................8 2. Investigated by the Employer alternatives for location (with sketches and coordinates of typical points in the established coordinate system of the country) and / or technology alternatives and the reasons for the choice of the study, given the impact on the environment, including the ''zero''alternative ...................................................................................9
    [Show full text]