NO. 16-273 In the Supreme Court of the United States GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Petitioner, v. G.G., BY HIS NEXT FRIEND AND MOTHER, DEIRDRE GRIMM, Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE 8,914 STUDENTS, PARENTS, GRANDPARENTS, AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS, ET AL., IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER Kristen K. Waggoner David A. Cortman Counsel of Record J. Matthew Sharp Gary S. McCaleb Rory T. Gray Alliance Defending Freedom Alliance Defending Freedom 15100 N. 90th Street 1000 Hurricane Shoals Rd. Scottsdale, AZ 85260 N.E., Ste. D-1100
[email protected] Lawrenceville, GA 30043 (480) 444-0020 (770) 339-0774 Counsel for Amici Curiae i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ...................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ............................................. 2 ARGUMENT .................................................................. 3 I. Title IX Does Not Require Schools to Violate Bodily Privacy Rights By Allowing Students to Use Locker Rooms, Showers, and Restrooms of the Opposite Sex. .................................................. 5 II. Students’ Bodily Privacy Rights Bar the School Board From Opening Sex-Specific Locker Room, Shower, and Restroom Facilities to Members of the Opposite Sex. ........................ 12 III.Exposing Individuals to Members of the Opposite Sex in Places Where Personal Privacy is Expected is Forbidden by the Constitutional Right of Bodily Privacy. ............. 14 IV. Bodily Privacy Rights Preclude Opening Even Certain Sex-Specific Places of Public Accommodation to Members of the Opposite Sex. ...................................................................... 18 V. Even in the Prison Context, the Constitutional Right of Bodily Privacy Forbids Regularly Exposing Unclothed Inmates to the View of Opposite-Sex Guards, and Students Have Much More Robust Privacy Rights.