Aquinian Christian Science with Unitarians, and Pentecostal Leanings 4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aquinian Christian Science with Unitarians, and Pentecostal Leanings 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I 1. Introduction 2. The Pure Logic of Theology 3. Theological Background - Aquinian Christian Science with Unitarians, and Pentecostal Leanings 4. Unitarians 5. Enter Pope Francis 6. The Substance of the Email I Sent on Muslims a. Apostate Europe b. Lessons from Francis c. Lessons from St. Dominic d. Muslims as the Blessed of Ishmael e. Lessons from Jews for Jesus f. Regarding Theological Divergence g. Note on Neopaganism 7. French Pears 8. An Ecumenical Rosetta Stone 9. Speaking of Ecumenism, My Parents 10. My Christian Ethos 11. The Christian Science Church, Not a Cult, but Who Cares? 12. Innovation? or Willful Naïveté? 13. Mary Baker Eddy’s Contribution, Christus Viktor 14. Eugenic Pseudo Science 15. Two Mary Baker Eddies, the Legend and the Church Lady 16. Where Am I Going with All This? 17. The Viewpoint Problem in Explanation 1 | Ecumenism, T rinity, Unity, Christian Science Reed Troutman 18. Theology, What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You 19. Was Mary Baker Eddy a Heretic? 20. The Ambitious Mary Baker Eddy 21. Mary Baker Eddy’s Sola Scriptura 22. Historical Pendula in Intellectual Christianity 23. Pendula in Nominal Change 24. I Am a Heretic Too 25. Editorial Bias 26. Working Backwards from Calvin 27. Theological Update Needed in the Christian Science Church, like in the Muslim Faith 28. All Seriousness Aside, My Great Disappointment 29. Spiritualizing Them Bones, Christian Scientists Versus Jehovah’s Witnesses 30. Updates for the Christian Science Church Part II 1. But Seriously, Does Belief in the Trinity Make us Christian? 2. Trinitarianism and Unitarianism in the Doctrine of the Trinity - An Alternate History of the Doctrine and the Unitarian Church 3. WWJD, Freedom of Conscience and Epistemology in the Enlightenment 4. Free Churches 5. Bonhoeffer’s “god who could Be Proved” 6. The Christian Scientists as a Free Church 7. “Unitarian Trinitarianism” a Free Choice, like in 12 Step Programs 8. The Doctrine of No Doctrines 9. The Doctrine of No Doctrines in Practice 10. Revival of Parts of Apostolic Tradition and Monastic Practices 11. What is the Straight Gate? 2 | Ecumenism, T rinity, Unity, Christian Science Reed Troutman 12. Submission to God and No One Else, Neither Bowing before the Crown, Nor Kissing the Ring 13. Adolph Von Harnack on Catholicism 14. Freedom qua Authenticity in Religion 15. Arminianism vs. Calvinism, Remonstrants vs. the Dutch Reformed Church, Wesley, vs. Whitfield, Mary Baker Eddy Vs. Calvin, Unitarian vs. Calvinist, NeoCalvinism vs. Billy Graham, Old Calvinism vs. New Calvinism 16. The Mischief Rule Hermeneutic 17. Old Calvinist TULIP vs. NeoCalvinist Evangelical-TULIP 18. Again, All Seriousness Aside: Spicy Ketchup 19. Protestant Christology and Catholic Mariology 20. Water Baptism 21. Who Decides which Churches Are Trinitarian? 22. Christian Science Marriages 23. Hyper-Egalitarian Trinitarianists In-Depth 24. Popery in the Christian Science Church 25. Two Bits of Theology, Census and Pain-Free Birth of Jesus 26. Mark Twain’s Criticism, as Endorsed by Val Kilmer 27. CS Lewis’ Literary Sola Scriptura 28. The Emperor Has No Clothes, but You Will Be Beaten if You Say So 29. Oppression and Scapegoating in the Christian Church 30. Two More Associated Problems, the Missing Christians and the Disturbed 31. The Status of Christians as the Status of Persons 32. Pragmatism in Theology 33. Phillip Yancey on Eastern Reaction to Jesus’ Crucifixion 34. The Safest Place on Earth, Mary’s Crypt 35. Peter Kreeft, a Modern Thomist's Example, and Bonhoeffer 36. Athanasius and the Athanasian Heresy 3 | Ecumenism, T rinity, Unity, Christian Science Reed Troutman 37. John Henry Newman’s Criticism of Protestant Trinitarianism 38. Heresy’s Etymology 39. First Century Christianity According to St. Peter and Harnack 40. Textual Criticism of the Koran, Embellishment vs. Simplification 41. The Psychological Angle - Please Understand Me II 42. The Five Love Languages of Gary Chapman 43. Feminist Literature's Standpoint Epistemology 44. Jesus the “Mass Man” According to Atheists and Popular Science 45. Mary the “Mass Woman” According to Protestants 46. Heuristic Theology 47. The Ecumenical Lesson of My Father 48. Theological Mistakes, Failures 49. Missing the Joke 50. God is Silly, Taking Giddiness Back 51. But All Seriousness Aside, Blaise Pascal 4 | Ecumenism, T rinity, Unity, Christian Science Reed Troutman Reed Troutman January 14, 2016 (Back to Top) Part I Introduction What got me thinking seriously about ecumenism was an email I sent to a friend on my view of the Christian mission to Muslims. I sent it a couple months ago while thinking about Muslim- Christian ecumenism and it got some wheels turning in my head over what needs to be said in general about ecumenism within the Christian community. I am glad the topic occurred to me a couple months earlier, as I was able to get my thoughts on Muslims out without the cognitive dissonance of watching the escalation of the refugee crisis in Europe and the violence of the Paris attacks in France, which now we Californians have seen erupt in San Bernardino as well. Of course, as a Christian I see some major issues where the Koran needs to be reconciled with the Christian faith. The most important of these is that they see it as blasphemy to say that Jesus is God, but I think there is a functional equivalent between the Christian view of the docetic heresy, and the Muslim view that the statement “Jesus is God” is blasphemous, because Muslims fail to understand what is meant by unity of “essence” rather than “persons” of the Trinity. So I think it is a reconcilable point. Some might wonder about the sagacity of studying ecumenism at this time though, in the context of so much religious extremism in the news, and I would counter that this is the perfect time to be studying ecumenism. Though ecumenism and religious violence need not be studied together, the ecumenical impulse can be viewed as a polar opposite of the impulse to religious violence and is a way of circumventing religious hostility. Ecumenism is animated by ongoing give-and- take engagement, while religious violence issues from a place of judgment where we dare to place ourselves alongside God in deciding ultimate questions for others. The religiously motivated violence that we see emanating from extremist Muslims or anti-abortion activists, is a problem that contrasts with ecumenism and may be amenable to the philosophical/theological dialogue, making this discussion timely considering the urgency of dialogue that is increased by crises of violence. And now we see Professor Larycia Hawkins has her tenured teaching position at Wheaton put in jeopardy for being an ecumenical Christian who dares to agree with Pope Francis in her understanding of God, as both the monotheistic God of Abraham and Muhammad, and as being the same as the Christian deity, which makes her doctrinally a theologically misspoken evangelical in Wheaton’s eyes. Incidentally, when Muslims say we are all people of the Book, they are referring to Moses’ Book of the Law, that we are people of the Torah, which Jesus said He came to uphold rather than abolish. So in quoting the Jewish and Muslim way of identifying with God’s law, Professor Hawkins was not necessarily being un-Christian, and while the 5 | Ecumenism, T rinity, Unity, Christian Science Reed Troutman question of whether we worship the same God as Muslims is slightly more complicated, many think she is correct on this point too. Her understanding may not be going against the majority view within Christianity, but against a specific version of protestant orthodoxy. By saying that there is only One God that Christians and Muslims both worship, and from Whom we are blessed with our universal human dignity by being created in the image of God, she may be only starting from a different point in understanding of the Trinity than Wheaton college is, resulting in mere terminological difference. We could joke that starting from a different theological angle is too much popery for Wheaton. But we should actually admire Wheaton for sticking to their theological guns and making an issue out of theology, which people too often think of as a dead letter and throw out the window in favor of go-along to get-along attitudes about what are actually the most important questions in the intellectual side of religion. Though we hope they will be receptive to Professor Hawkins’ desire for reconciliation as well. This is a great chance for Professor Hawkins and Wheaton to give the world an example of theological debate and reconciliation. As Dietrich Bonhoeffer says, the gospel makes room for itself on earth, even and precisely when no such opportunity is offered to it, and in her suspension we see both Professor Hawkins and the theological decision makers at Wheaton carrying their crosses. As a discreet theological question, one of them has to be correct. Either Christians and Muslims worship God or they don’t. Understanding Jesus divinity correctly is either required as a precondition of God’s hearing our prayers, or it isn’t. But rather than a novel question, this is one that has plagued Christians for our entire history. Who is a Christian, who is saved? Oftentimes in history the question has revolved, as at Wheaton, around how the Godhead is defined. Wheaton and Professor Hawkins are now set to rehash the same arguments that divided Arians from Athanasians during the council of Nicaea, and which remain controverted among various Christian groups, not to mention among Muslims, Jewish, and secular groups. Perhaps the examination shared here of differing conceptions of the Trinity within Christendom can be helpful to anyone trying to understand the conflict at Wheaton, in history and as a matter of ecclesiology.
Recommended publications
  • Soteriology 1 Soteriology
    Soteriology 1 Soteriology OVERVIEW 2 Sin and Salvation 2 The Gospel 3 Three broad aspects 4 Justification 4 Sanctification 5 Glorification 6 ATONEMENT 6 General Results 6 Old Testament Background 6 Sacrifice of Jesus 7 Atonement Theories 9 Extent of the Atonement 10 Synthesis 11 FAITH AND GRACE 13 Types of Faith 13 Christian concept of Faith 14 Rev. J. Wesley Evans Soteriology 2 Grace 15 Nature of Grace 15 Types of Grace 15 Sufficient and Efficacious 15 General effects of Grace (acc. to Aquinas II.I.111.3) 16 THE SALVATION PROCESS 16 Overview Sin and Salvation General Principal: The nature of the problem determines the nature of the solution Problem (Sin related issues) Solution (Salvation) Broken relationship with God Reconciliation and Adoption Death of the Soul (Original Sin) Soul regenerated, allowing the will to seek God Humans under God’s judgment Promise of forgiveness and mercy Corruption of the world, broken Future New Creation relationship with the natural world Evil and unjust human systems Future inauguration of the Kingdom of God Temptation of Satan and fallen angels Future judgment on evil The list above of the sacraments is my own speculation, it seems to “fit” at this point. Rev. J. Wesley Evans Soteriology 3 The Gospel Mark 1:1 The beginning of the good news [ euvaggeli,ou ] of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. Luke 9:6 They departed and went through the villages, bringing the good news [euvaggelizo,menoi ] and curing diseases everywhere. Acts 5:42 And every day in the temple and at home they did not cease to teach and proclaim [ euvaggelizo,menoi ] Jesus as the Messiah.
    [Show full text]
  • De La Conversion À La Guérison Puritanisme, Psychothérapies, Développement Personnel
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenGrey Repository Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense École doctorale Économie, Organisations, Société Laboratoire Sophiapol De la conversion à la guérison Puritanisme, psychothérapies, développement personnel Thèse Pour obtenir le grade de Docteur en sciences humaines et sociales, mention sociologie Soutenue le 29 mai 2013 par Pierre Prades Sous la direction d’Alain Caillé, professeur des uni@versités, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense Jury M. Hubert BOST, directeur de recherche, École Pratique des Hautes Études M. Alain CAILLÉ, professeur émérite, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense Mme Jacqueline CARROY, directeur d’études, École des Hautes Études en Sciences sociales M. Stéphane HABER, professeur des universités, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense Mme Roberte HAMAYON, directeur d’études, École Pratique des Hautes Études De la conversion à la guérison. Puritanisme, psychothérapies, développement personnel II De la conversion à la guérison. Puritanisme, psychothérapies, développement personnel Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense École doctorale Économie, Organisations, Société Laboratoire Sophiapol De la conversion à la guérison Puritanisme, psychothérapies, développement personnel Pierre Prades 29 mai 2013 III De la conversion à la guérison. Puritanisme, psychothérapies, développement personnel IV De la conversion à la guérison. Puritanisme, psychothérapies, développement personnel À Brigitte, généreuse et patiente mécène, dont l’indulgente bienveillance m’a soutenu durant de si longues années, et sans laquelle je n’aurais pu ni entreprendre ni réaliser ce projet, À Jeanne, lectrice attentive et critique éclairée, À Louis, pour l’émulation, À mon père, avec le regret d’avoir tant tardé, et à ma mère, qui a attendu avec confiance.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Religion and the Courts 1790-1947 Leslie C. Griffin When the Framers
    Religion and the Courts 1790-1947 Leslie C. Griffin* When the Framers drafted the United States Constitution in 1787, the only mention of religion was the remarkable text of Article VI, which states “no Religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” That groundbreaking language marked a shift from prior practice in Europe and the states. At the time of the Constitution’s drafting, most states had religious qualifications for government officials, following the pattern in Britain, where the monarch was required to be a member of the Church of England. In Europe the guiding principle was cuius regio, eius religio: the religion of the people is determined by the religion of the ruler. Many of the Framers, especially James Madison, believed that the new Constitution protected liberty of conscience by creating a government of enumerated and separate powers that gave Congress no authority over religion. During the ratification process, however, constitutional critics demanded greater protection of individuals from the power of the government. In order to secure the Constitution’s ratification, the new Congress drafted a Bill of Rights that protected religious freedom in the following language: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Upon ratification by the states in 1791, the language about religion became the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.1 The two Religion Clauses of the First Amendment are known as the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. Although Madison suggested that the standard protecting liberty of conscience should apply to state as well as federal governments, the language of the First Amendment—“Congress 1 shall”—applied only to the federal government.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Bibliography of American History Through Biography
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 088 763 SO 007 145 AUTHOR Fustukjian, Samuel, Comp. TITLE Selected Bibliography of American History through Biography. PUB DATE Aug 71 NOTE 101p.; Represents holdings in the Penfold Library, State University of New York, College at Oswego EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-$5.40 DESCRIPTORS *American Culture; *American Studies; Architects; Bibliographies; *Biographies; Business; Education; Lawyers; Literature; Medicine; Military Personnel; Politics; Presidents; Religion; Scientists; Social Work; *United States History ABSTRACT The books included in this bibliography were written by or about notable Americans from the 16th century to the present and were selected from the moldings of the Penfield Library, State University of New York, Oswego, on the basis of the individual's contribution in his field. The division irto subject groups is borrowed from the biographical section of the "Encyclopedia of American History" with the addition of "Presidents" and includes fields in science, social science, arts and humanities, and public life. A person versatile in more than one field is categorized under the field which reflects his greatest achievement. Scientists who were more effective in the diffusion of knowledge than in original and creative work, appear in the tables as "Educators." Each bibliographic entry includes author, title, publisher, place and data of publication, and Library of Congress classification. An index of names and list of selected reference tools containing biographies concludes the bibliography. (JH) U S DEPARTMENT Of NIA1.114, EDUCATIONaWELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OP EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO DUCED ExAC ICY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATIONORIGIN ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILYREPRE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY PREFACE American History, through biograRhies is a bibliography of books written about 1, notable Americans, found in Penfield Library at S.U.N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • And Then God Created Kansas--The Evolution/Creationism Debate In
    COMMENTS AND THEN GOD CREATED KANSAS? THE EVOLUTION/CREATIONISM DEBATE IN AMERICA'S PUBLIC SCHOOLS MARJORIE GEORGE' "For most Kansans, there really is no conflict between science and religion. Our churches have helped us search for spiritual truth, and our schools have helped us understand the natural world." -Brad Williamson, biology teacher at Olathe East High School in Olathe, Kansas.' INTRODUCTION Kansas has recently become embroiled in a fierce debate over the minds of the state's children, specifically regarding what those children will learn in their public school science classrooms. At first glance, a science curriculum does not seem like a subject of great controversy, but it continues to be one in Kansas and other communities across the country. The controversy hinges specifically on the role evolution should play in science classrooms, but also reflects the broader debate over what role schools should play in students' moral development. Today many parents are worried about sending their children to t BA. 1993, Washington University; J.D. Candidate 2001, University of Pennsylania. Thank you to Sarah Barringer Gordon for her initial advice and editorial comments, and Tracey George for her always helpful comments, as well as her thirty years of encouragement and inspiration. A very special thanks to Jonathan Petty tor alwa)s believing in me and providing unwavering support for my decision to attend law school and of my numerous pursuits during law school. Finally, thank you to all of the Penn Law Review editors for their hard work on this and every article. I Brad Williamson, I Teach, Therefore I IVor7, in Kansas, WASH.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Universalist Churches—United States—History—18Th Century
    The Universalist Movement in America 1770–1880 Recent titles in religion in america series Harry S. Stout, General Editor Saints in Exile Our Lady of the Exile The Holiness-Pentecostal Experience in Diasporic Religion at a Cuban Catholic African American Religion and Culture Shrine in Miami Cheryl J. Sanders Thomas A. Tweed Democratic Religion Taking Heaven by Storm Freedom, Authority, and Church Discipline Methodism and the Rise of Popular in the Baptist South, 1785–1900 Christianity in America Gregory A. Willis John H. Wigger The Soul of Development Encounters with God Biblical Christianity and Economic An Approach to the Theology of Transformation in Guatemala Jonathan Edwards Amy L. Sherman Michael J. McClymond The Viper on the Hearth Evangelicals and Science in Mormons, Myths, and the Historical Perspective Construction of Heresy Edited by David N. Livingstone, Terryl L. Givens D. G. Hart, and Mark A. Noll Sacred Companies Methodism and the Southern Mind, Organizational Aspects of Religion and 1770–1810 Religious Aspects of Organizations Cynthia Lynn Lyerly Edited by N. J. Demerath III, Princeton in the Nation’s Service Peter Dobkin Hall, Terry Schmitt, Religious Ideals and Educational Practice, and Rhys H. Williams 1868–1928 Mary Lyon and the Mount Holyoke P. C. Kemeny Missionaries Church People in the Struggle Amanda Porterfield The National Council of Churches and the Being There Black Freedom Movement, 1950–1970 Culture and Formation in Two James F. Findlay, Jr. Theological Schools Tenacious of Their Liberties Jackson W. Carroll, Barbara G. Wheeler, The Congregationalists in Daniel O. Aleshire, and Colonial Massachusetts Penny Long Marler James F.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Scientists in the Courts
    Christianity Case Study – Minority in America 2018 Christian Scientists in the Courts Since independence, Christians have always been a majority of the US population, so it may seem curious to call American Christians a minority. However, some Christians have been rejected by the wider US Christian community and are thus “minoritized”—meaning they are treated as if they do not belong to the majority. Christians from such groups have often claimed they face persecution or hardships. One of these groups is the Christian Scientists. This American born The Mother Church of the Church of Christ, religion began in 1879 in Massachusetts, with Scientist, in Boston, Massachusetts. Photo by Rizka, teachings of Mary Baker Eddy, who wrote a book July 15, 2014. Wikimedia Commons: called Science and Health, which became a holy http://bit.ly/2s6MpcU. text to Christian Scientists along with the Bible. Note on this Case Study: The text describes the material world as an 1 illusion, and the real world as totally spiritual. Religions are embedded in culture, and are deeply impacted by questions of power. While Based in this belief, Christian Scientists generally reading this case study about Christianity and view disease and illness as a mental error, not a life as a member of a minority religion in America, think about who is in power and who physical problem. Thus, to heal ailments, they lacks power. Is someone being oppressed? Is usually rely on prayer rather than medical care. someone acting as an oppressor? How might When members get sick, they call for a “Christian religious people respond differently when they Science Practitioner”—a person certified by the are in a position of authority or in a position of Church, but with no medical credentials—to pray oppression? over them for healing in what believers call a As always, when thinking about religion and “treatment.” They usually refuse to vaccinate power, focus on how religion is internally their children, take medicine of any kind, or see a diverse, always evolving and changing, and doctor, even for emergencies.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2021 Change
    July 2021 In This Issue: President's Message Send Your Information Affiliate Activities We Remember Notable Birthdays Calendar of Events Change. After the past year and a half, most likely all of us have a new perspective on change and everything it connotes. Change can be frightening, uncomfortable and heartbreaking. It also can be rejuvenating, uplifting and necessary. One of the biggest changes NFPW found it necessary to make during the COVID-19 pandemic was to shift the 2021 conference from an in-person meeting to a virtual event. It was a tremendous leap of faith. How would members respond? How would potential speakers respond? Could we make the technology work? What resulted was rejuvenating and uplifting, due in no small measure to the efforts of the conference host affiliate—Arkansas Press Women—and their commitment to what turned out to be a two-year odyssey to get from Baton Rouge in 2019 to Little Rock in 2021. And what a conference it turned out to be! The sessions were interesting, engaging and moving. We heard from such remarkable women as Michelle Duster, the great- granddaughter of African-American journalist and activist Ida B. Wells, and Elizabeth Eckford, one of nine African-American students who integrated Little Rock’s Central High School in 1957. I hope those of you who heard them speak were as inspired as I was. We also had a chance to learn the latest about drones, podcasting, social media strategies, writing memoirs, being a food and travel writer, and misinformation on the Internet—all relevant and important topics in today’s rapidly changing media world.
    [Show full text]
  • Separate Prayers
    VOLUME SIX, NUMBER SIX NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 1981 Publi~:ker/Editor PETER BERGER PEGGY FLETCHER CONTEMPORARY 38 THE DILEMMAS OF PLURALISM Mana,gin,~ Editor ISSUES Need we fear the religious uncertainty of modernity? SUSAN STAKER OMAN Associate Editor MORMON WOMEN AND THE STRUGGLE FOR LORIE WINDER DEFINITION Assistant Editor. An evening with the B.H. Roberts Society NICOLE HOFFMAN Ar~~ Director 7 The Nineteenth Century Church CAROL CORNWALL MADSEN WARREN ARCHER II 12 Contemporary Women LAVINA FIELDING ANDERSON Drl,arl,u’,t Editors DENNIS CLARK, POETRY 17 What is the Church? FRANCINE RUSSELL BENNION ANNE THIEME, ONE FOLD SCRIPTURAL COMMENTARY, STEVEN F. CHRISTENSEN HISTORY 44 GROWING UP IN EARLY UTAH: THE WASATCH Staff LITERARY ASSOCIATION, 1874-1878 RONALD W. WALKER KERRY WJLLIAM BATE A jaunty forerunner of the MIA LOUISE BROWN PAUL BROWN 21 ZION: THE STRUCTURE OF A THEOLOGICAL SUSAIN KEENE REVOLUTION STEVEN L. OLSEN L. JOHN LEWIS CHRIS THOMAS History of an LDS idea MARK THOMAS 55 THE MORMON PAST: REVEALED OR REVISITED? JAN SHIPPS FINETTE WALKER Circulation/Promotion Distinguishing between sacred and ordinary history REBECCAH T. HARRIS RENEE HEPWORTH MARK JARDINE RELIGION 52 FINITIST THEOLOGY AND THE PROBLEM OF Business Manager BRUCE BENNETT EVIL PETER C. APPLEBY Financial Assistants A lucid analysis of a knotty issue TOD K. CHRISTENSEN SHAWN GARCIA SCHOW 27 WHAT IS MORAL OBLIGATION WITHIN National Correspondents MORMON THEOLOGY? KIM MCCALL James W. Lucas, New York City; Searching for the source of ethical behavior George D. Smith, San Francisco; Bonnie M. Bodet and Charlotte. Johnson, Berkel~; Joel C Peterson, Dal|a$; FICTION 32 SEPARATE PRAYERS ANN EDWARDS-CANNON Anne Castleton Busath, Houston; Kris Cassity and Irene Bates, Los Ansel~$; Susan Sessions Rugh, Chicaso; Janna Daniels Haynie, Denver; POETRY 58 Sanctuary DAWN BAKER BRIMLEY Allen Palmer, Two Poems on Entanglement DALE BJORK Anne Carroll P.
    [Show full text]
  • From Nominal to Radical Discipleship: One Church’S Approach to Disciple Making
    FROM NOMINAL TO RADICAL DISCIPLESHIP: ONE CHURCH’S APPROACH TO DISCIPLE MAKING WAYNE BERK WALTERS A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Ph.D. in Leadership & Change Program of Antioch University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May, 2011 Signature Page This is to certify that the dissertation entitled: FROM NOMINAL TO RADICAL DISCIPLESHIP: ONE CHURCH’S APPROACH TO DISCIPLE MAKING prepared by Wayne Berk Walters is approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Leadership and Change. Approved by: __________________________________________________ __________________ Carolyn Kenny, Ph.D., Chair date __________________________________________________ __________________ Philomena Essed, Ph.D., Committee Member date __________________________________________________ __________________ Joel Green, Ph.D., Committee Member date __________________________________________________ __________________ Donald Polkinghorne, Ph.D., External Reader date Copyright 2011 Wayne Walters All rights reserved Acknowledgements I wish to thank my chairperson, Dr. Carolyn Kenny, who guided me with gentle but instructive help along the journey of research and writing my dissertation. I also wish to thank my committee members, Dr. Philomena Essed, Dr. Joel Green, and Dr. Don Polkinghorne for their suggestions for improvements and for their support in this part of my journey in both this degree program and as I seek to continually better understand my role as a Christian and as a pastor. Most of all I wish to thank my wife, Christine Walters, for her consistent support and encouragement, and my children, Brenna, Christopher, Eric, and Joshua who found ways to take care of themselves as I had my head in books or was writing yet another chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Baker Eddy Incoming Correspondence Index, Alphabetical
    Incoming Correspondence of Mary Baker Eddy (Formerly Chestnut Hill File) Collection Description Correspondence, c. 1880–1910 This collection consists mainly of letters received by Mary Baker Eddy and members of her household from c. 1880–1910. A small quantity of correspondence also predates and postdates this time span. Comments, notations, and responses by Eddy or her staff also appear on some documents. Correspondents include family, students, employees, Christian Scientists, the general public, and a few notable figures such as journalist Arthur Brisbane and suffragist Susan B. Anthony. There are approximately 6,700 correspondent files, many consisting of one letter (see finding aid for complete list). It is likely that her personal secretary, Calvin A. Frye, organized this file with assistance from other secretaries in later years. The name Chestnut Hill File derives from Mary Baker Eddy’s last home in Chestnut Hill, MA, where the file was located until it was moved to The First Church of Christ, Scientist sometime after 1915. Because of confusion about the scope and content of the file–it is not correspondence only from the time Eddy lived at Chestnut Hill, nor is it material about Chestnut Hill or the home located there–the file has been renamed to reflect what the file does contain, Eddy’s incoming correspondence. Size of collection: 38.3 linear feet Date opened: large portions on September 29, 2002 and December 23, 2002 Access: Some material is open. Remaining material will be processed upon request. See finding aid for a complete list of files and their status. 200 Massachusetts Avenue Boston, MA 02115 888-222-3711 www.marybakereddylibrary.org Provenance The Chestnut Hill File was transferred to the archives of The First Church of Christ, Scientist, sometime after the conveyance of Eddy’s personal property from the Trustees Under the Will of Mary Baker Eddy to the church.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christian Science Hymnal, with Five Hymns Written by Reverend Mary Baker Eddy
    The Christian Science hymnal, with five hymns written by Reverend Mary Baker Eddy. Boston, Mass., The Christian Science Publishing Society [1909 i.e. 1910] https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015056375143 Public Domain, Google-digitized http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google We have determined this work to be in the public domain, meaning that it is not subject to copyright. Users are free to copy, use, and redistribute the work in part or in whole. It is possible that current copyright holders, heirs or the estate of the authors of individual portions of the work, such as illustrations or photographs, assert copyrights over these portions. Depending on the nature of subsequent use that is made, additional rights may need to be obtained independently of anything we can address. The digital images and OCR of this work were produced by Google, Inc. (indicated by a watermark on each page in the PageTurner). Google requests that the images and OCR not be re-hosted, redistributed or used commercially. The images are provided for educational, scholarly, non-commercial purposes. CHRISTIAN SCIENCE HYMNAL Y THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE HYMNAL WITH FIVE HYMNS WRITTEN BY REVEREND MARY BAKER EDDY DISCOVERER AND FOUNDER OS CHRISTIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHEDBY THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING SOCIETY FALMOUTH AND ST. PAUL STREETS BOSTON, U.S.A. Copyright, 1898, 1903, 1905 and 1909 by The Christian Science Board of Directors" BOSTON, MASS. All rights reserved. (Printed in U. S. A.) PREFACE TO THE 1910 EDITION OF THE HYMNAL. In presenting the 19 10 edition of the Hymnal, the Committee does not claim that all the hymns therein are strictly scientific, as the selection had to be made very largely from the writings of authors who were unacquainted with the teachings of Christian Science.
    [Show full text]