DOCSLIB.ORG

West Tamar Draft LPS Representation 57

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Tamar Draft LPS Representation 57 Department of State Growth 4 Salamanca Place, Hobart TAS 7000 GPO Box 536, Hobart TAS 7001 Australia Ph 1800 030 688 Fax (03) 6233 5800 Email [email protected] Web www.stategrowth.tas.gov.au Mr Rolph Vos General Manager West Tamar Council PO Box 16 RIVERSIDE TAS 7250 By email: [email protected]; [email protected] Tasmanian Planning Scheme – draft West Tamar Local Provisions Schedule Dear Mr Vos Thank you for your invitation to comment on the draft West Tamar Council Local Provisions Schedule (LPS). The Department of State Growth (State Growth) has reviewed the draft LPS, supporting mapping and overlay information and believes it largely reflects a sound translation from the West Tamar Interim Planning Scheme 2013 in accordance with the Tasmanian Planning Commission’s Guideline No. 1 Local Provisions Schedule (LPS): zone and code application. A detailed review has however highlighted a small number of issues that will require rectification or further discussion with Council officers and the Tasmanian Planning Commission. I have outlined each of the issues in the attached document for your consideration. Please do not hesitate to contact Patrick Carroll, Principal Land Use Planning Analyst at [email protected] or on 03 6166 4472 who can arrange for relevant officers to respond to the matters raised in this submission. Yours sincerely Martin Blake CEO Infrastructure Tasmania 30 April 2021 Attachment 1 – State Growth Comments Attachment 1. State Growth comments - draft West Tamar Local Provisions Schedule State Road Network Zoning of the State Road Network UZ 1 of Guideline No. 1 – Local Provisions Schedule (LPS): zone and code application (the ‘Guidelines’)1 states: The Utilities Zone should be applied to land that is used, or intended to be used, for major utilities infrastructure, including: (a) category 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 roads as defined in the Tasmanian State Road Hierarchy published by the Tasmanian Department of State Growth; (b) any listed major local roads; (c) future road corridors for major local and all State roads; (d) energy production facilities, such as power stations, and major electricity substation facilities; (e) waste water treatment plants; or (f) rail corridors. Consistent with UZ 1, all State Roads should be zoned Utilities and based on the State Road Casement layer published on the LIST. This layer was developed to assist Councils in drafting their LPSs, with the intent to clearly identify land forming part of the State road network for inclusion within the Utilities Zone. State Growth can advise that it is satisfied with Council’s application of the State Road Casement. State Roads support Council’s application of the Road and Railway Code provisions, rather than relying on overlay mapping. This will also ensure consistency with other approved LPSs (Brighton, Meander Valley, Burnie and Devonport). West Tamar Highway near Craythorne Road CT 151920/3 is Crown Land, specifically Acquired Road. This parcel is highlighted in Figure 1, below. The land is currently zoned as Rural Resource under the Interim Scheme, and is proposed to be zoned Agriculture under the draft LPS. State Growth advises that this parcel forms part of the State Road network. At a minimum, to provide adequate sight distance to the West Tamar Highway/Craythorne Road intersection, State Growth requests that the land to the south of the yellow line in Figure 1 be zoned Utilities. 1 Tasmanian Planning Commission (2018) Guideline No. 1 – Local Provisions Schedule (LPS): zone and code application. Version 2.0. https://www.planning.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/583854/Section-8A-Guideline-No.-1-Local-Provisions-Schedule-LPS- zone-and-code-application-version-2.pdf Page 2 of 8 Figure 1. CT 151920/3 is highlighted in blue. The yellow line demonstrates sight distance from the West Tamar Highway to the Craythorne Road intersection. Natural Assets Code There are several instances where the Natural Assets Code overlay maps Future Coastal Refugia Areas over the existing carriageway of the State Road Network. As per Table NAC 1 of the Guidelines, the Utilities Zone is a case-by-case zone. NAC 6 of the Guidelines relevantly states: The future coastal refugia area overlay should be derived from the guidance map, with the following considerations: (a) … (b) … (c) the future coastal refugia area overlay may be applied to land that is currently within a case-by- case consideration zone if: (i) the application of the future coastal refugia area overlay is compatible with the purpose of the zone; or (ii) the application of the future coastal refugia area overlay will not significantly impact on the existing development on the land. (d) … Consistent with NAC 6 (c) of the Guidelines, it is requested that - unless sufficient justification can be provided to the Tasmanian Planning Commission - the Natural Assets Code Overlay Maps be reviewed to ensure that Future Coastal Refugia Areas do not overlap with any State Roads, which are to be zoned Utilities. This is because the application of such an overlay to the State Road Network has the potential to constrain future use and development of major infrastructure. There are also several instances where the Natural Assets Code overlay maps Priority Vegetation Areas over the existing carriageway of the State Road Network. It is recommended that the draft Natural Assets Code overlay maps are removed from the State Road parcels. Page 3 of 8 Passenger Transport A new Specific Area Plan (SAP) has been introduced for the Low Density Residential Zone for the areas in Beaconsfield, Beauty Point, Blackwall, Rosevears, Deviot, Exeter, Gravelly Beach, Grindelwald, Legana (north and south), Riverside and Swan Point. The SAP aims to retain the existing settlement structure and it is unlikely that the density of development will significantly increase, due to limitations in providing on-site wastewater treatment for those properties. There are no immediate negative consequences to the provision of passenger transport if this SAP were to be introduced. Overall, the draft LPS appears to be largely a direct translation of the existing Interim Planning Scheme, with some minor exceptions, and there are no obvious increases in densities or changes to zoning that would affect the provision of passenger transport. Port and Marine There are a number of properties proposed to be zoned Ports and Marine: • Garden Island, 171, 173 & 175 Bevic Road, Clarence Point, owned by the Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd. • Inspection Head Wharf, 200 Flinders Street, Beauty Point is owned by the Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd. • 112 Flinders Street, Beauty Point, owned by the Australian Maritime College. • Wharf Road, Beauty Point, which is Crown Land. The proposed zoning under the LPS is a direct translation of the existing Interim Scheme zoning. State Growth supports the proposed zoning of these properties. Forestry The draft LPS has applied the Agriculture Zone to a number of Private Timber Reserves (PTR) across the municipality that are currently zoned Rural Resource under the Interim Scheme. Section 20.1 of the State Planning Provisions (SPPs) provides for the Zone Purpose for the Rural Zone: The purpose of the Rural Zone is: 20.1.1 To provide for a range of use or development in a rural location: (a) where agricultural use is limited or marginal due to topographical, environmental or other site or regional characteristics; (b) that requires a rural location for operational reasons; (c) is compatible with agricultural use if occurring on agricultural land; Page 4 of 8 (d) minimises adverse impacts on surrounding uses. 20.1.2 To minimise conversion of agricultural land for non-agricultural use. 20.1.3 To ensure that use or development is of a scale and intensity that is appropriate for a rural location and does not compromise the function of surrounding settlements. Section 21.1 of the SPPs provides for the Zone Purpose of the Agriculture Zone: The purpose of the Agriculture Zone is: 21.1.1 To provide for the use or development of land for agricultural use. 21.1.2 To protect land for the use or development of agricultural use by minimising: (a) conflict with or interference from non-agricultural uses; (b) non-agricultural use or development that precludes the return of the land to agricultural use; and (c) use of land for non-agricultural use in irrigation districts. 21.1.3 To provide for use or development that supports the use of the land for agricultural use. AZ 6 of the Guidelines relevantly states: Land identified in the ‘Land Potentially Suitable for Agriculture Zone’ layer may be considered for alternate zoning if: (a) … (b) for the identification and protection of a strategically important naturally occurring resource which requires an alternate zoning; (c) … (d) for the identification, provision or protection of strategically important uses that require an alternate zone; or (e) … Further, RZ 1 of the Guidelines states: The Rural Zone should be applied to land in non-urban areas with limited or no potential for agriculture as a consequence of topographical, environmental or other characteristics of the area, and which is not more appropriately included within the Landscape Conservation Zone or Environmental Management Zone for the protection of specific values. RZ 3 of the Guidelines relevantly states: The Rural Zone may be applied to land identified in the ‘Land Potentially Suitable for Agriculture Zone’ layer, if: (a) … (b) … Page 5 of 8 (c) the land is identified for the protection
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Legislative Council Thursday 25 March 2021
    PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL REPORT OF DEBATES Thursday 25 March 2021 REVISED EDITION Thursday 25 March 2021 The President, Mr Farrell, took the Chair at 11 a.m., acknowledged the Traditional People and read Prayers. JUSTICE MISCELLANEOUS (COMMISSIONS OF INQUIRY) BILL 2021 (No. 6) Third Reading Bill read the third time. WORKPLACES (PROTECTION FROM PROTESTERS) AMENDMENT BILL 2019 (No. 54) Second Reading Continued from 24 March 2021 (page 56). [11.05 a.m.] Ms RATTRAY (McIntyre) - Mr President, I mentioned when I moved the adjournment last night that I might well think of something else to add. I do have a very brief offering. I will not take up too much time of the House and the members. Just as I concluded my contribution I received an email from Danny Carney. I do not know if Danny Carney is a Tasmanian citizen, but I assume he is and I want to thank him for contacting me. I replied to Mr Carney earlier today. He asked whether I have any evidence to back up my statement about protesters coming into Tasmania - that they are paid to come to our state and perhaps use funds they are provided with to protest in and around the state for various things. I have provided Mr Carney with some names I was able to source overnight. I was going to talk about those, but I have decided that might not be terribly advantageous, because I do not want to be in conflict with anyone. It is not what I am about and it is not my nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Road Futures
    TASMANIAN ROAD FUTURES FUNDING PRIORITIES 2019 & BEYOND Road Funding Commitments Funding Total Funding Total Funding Total from cost from cost from cost 2019 2019 2019 Greater Hobart Traffic Solution $72.1M $93.8M Includes: East Tamar Highway $6M $7M Northern Road Upgrades State and Federal $44.9M $54.2M State and Federal – Mowbray Connector Midland Highway 10 year plan Control of Macquarie and Davey streets Includes: West Tamar Highway $11.2M $12M Bass Highway – Deloraine to Latrobe Southern Outlet fifth lane Traffic Solution: Pedestrian crossing Campbell Town River Derwent ferry service Gravelly Beach Road to Rosevears Drive Tasman Highway at Myrtle Park Traffic incident response Atkinsons Road and Waldhorn Drive Dorset Roads Package and transport access points Overtaking opportunities between Exeter Bus priorities and active transport initiatives and Batman Highway junction Tomahawk to Gladstone Northern suburbs light rail Resealing and widening north of Batman Prossers Road Highway intersection to Lightwood Hills Road Underground bus transit centre Esk Main Road Left turn lane Motor Road/West Greater Hobart master plan Tamar Highway junction Airport to Evandale Road Improved Hadspen access Urban Congestion Fund State $24M State and Federal $84.7M $0.4m Federal $58.7M State $58M State Bridgewater Bridge $576M Midland Highway 10 year plan $325M Hobart Congestion Package (linked to Federal $236M Federal $111.4M projects in Greater Hobart Traffic Solution) Roads of Strategic Importance: Bass State $25.8M North West Road Upgrades State and Federal $35.7M $50.1M Tasman Highway Intelligent Transport Systems Highway (Wynyard to Marrawah), $606M Hobart to Sorell corridor, Birralee Federal $205M Bass Highway (West of Wynyard), including South East Traffic Solution State and Federal $25.9M $27M Main Road, Old Surry Road/Massey- Brittons Swamp, Wynyard to Smithton passing Greene Drive, Murchison Highway, lanes, access to Boat Harbour Primary School Tasman Highway near Tasmania Golf Club Lyell Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Freight Survey 2008-09 – Data Summary Page 1 of 38
    Tasmanian Freight Survey 2008-09 – Data Summary Page 1 of 38 Tasmanian Freight Survey Data Summary 2013 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Tasmanian Freight Survey 2008-09 – Data Summary Page 2 of 38 Tasmanian Freight Survey Data Summary 2013 Introduction The Tasmanian Freight Survey is undertaken by the Infrastructure Strategy Division of the Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources (DIER) to inform planning for Tasmania’s future freight transport system. The 2011-12 Survey is the fourth time that the survey has been conducted, with previous surveys held in 2002-03, 2005-06 and 2008-09. Around 150 interviews were conducted, allowing DIER to capture data from many businesses across Tasmania; to understand freight movements to and from businesses; the frequency of trips; and the types of vehicles used. Survey results can be compared to previous years’ results to better understand changes in freight demanding industries, such as the recent decline in the forestry task, and major structural changes to the freight system such as the withdrawal of a direct international shipping service from the Port of Launceston (Bell Bay). The Survey provides a summary of large freight movements across the major parts of Tasmania’s land transport network. The Survey provides information on: • the location of freight trips, including: o movements between and through major sea and air ports; and o between industrial areas and across network segments (road and rail). • freight tonnage; • commodity type; and • mode and vehicle type. Data from the Survey is used for a number of different purposes, including: • detailed freight movement analysis and modelling for projects including funding submissions and State transport policies; • developing the State Road Hierarchy; • developing regional integrated transport plans, including the o Southern Integrated Transport Plan; o Northern Integrated Transport Plan; and o Cradle Coast Integrated Transport Plan • assessing the potential impact of road development proposals on freight movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Launceston Traffic Review Transport Issues Paper
    Launceston Traffic Review Transport Issues Paper November 2012 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Contents Executive Summary 3 Terms and Definitions 7 1. Introduction and background 8 1.1. Background 8 1.2. Study Area 8 1.3. Transport Network 10 1.3.1. State Road Network 10 1.3.2. Local Road Network 12 1.4. Review of Previous Reports 14 1.4.1. Launceston Area Transportation Study (1968) 14 1.4.2. Launceston Traffic Model (1999, 2007) 15 1.4.3. Northern Tasmanian Integrated Transport Plan (2003) 16 1.4.4. Pulp Mill Transport Impact Assessment (2007) 16 1.4.5. Bell Bay Pulp Mill Launceston Traffic Study (2012) 17 1.4.6. Goderich Street/ Lindsay Street Intersection Modelling (2012) 18 1.4.7. Charles Street/ Esplanade Intersection Assessment (2012) 18 1.4.8. Traffic Management Options Study, Kings Meadows (2012) 19 1.4.9. Stakeholder Concerns 19 2. Traffic Volumes 21 2.1. Existing Traffic Volumes 21 2.2. Council Cordon Movement Data 23 2.3. Impact of Proposed Developments 24 3. Road Safety Performance 25 3.1. Overall Crash Trends 25 3.2. Intersection Crashes 28 3.3. Mid-Block Crashes 32 4. Travel Time Analysis 34 4.1. Travel Time Reliability 34 4.2. Travel Time Surveys 34 5. SCATS Congested Minutes Analysis 55 5.1. Introduction 55 5.2. SCATS Congested Minutes 55 5.3. Methodology 56 5.4. Results and Analysis 57 6. Freight Demand 67 6.1. Overview 67 6.2. Freight Routes 67 6.3. Freight Road Safety Analysis 70 7.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA RELEASE Saturday, 30 January 2021
    MEDIA RELEASE Saturday, 30 January 2021 RACT member survey reveals Tassie’s worst roads RACT members are calling for major investments into Tasmania’s worst roads. RACT’s Chief Member Experience Officer, Stacey Pennicott, said 200,000 members were invited to have their say on Tasmania’s roads. “We asked our 200,000 members to tell us what roads weren’t up to scratch and the results were clear,” Ms Pennicott said. “The Tasman Highway is by far Tasmania’s worst road, according to our members with nearly 40 per cent of those responding saying it needs urgent upgrades. “The Tasman Highway runs for 410 kilometres between Launceston and Hobart, covering the north- east, east coast and Hobart’s eastern shore. As visitor numbers begin to pick up and as the population served by the Tasman continues to grow, this Highway is going to become more and more important. Unfortunately, it has not received anywhere near the investment required to keep up with demand. Ms Pennicott said that the Midland Highway was rated Tasmania’s second worst road, with a third of RACT members surveyed saying more needs to be done. “We have seen significant upgrades on the Midland Highway in recent years and the State and Federal Governments deserve credit for that. However, there is still a lot of work to be done to bring the full length of the Highway up to scratch. “Hobart’s Southern Outlet was ranked as Tasmania’s third worst road due to persistent problems with delays. We encourage the Government to get on with its plans to improve access by developing park and ride facilities in Kingston to take the pressure off and help avoid the daily bottlenecks at peak times.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Speed Zoning Guidelines
    Tasmanian Speed Zoning Guidelines Document title 1 Contents Copyright notice and disclaimer ................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................2 Speed Limits in Tasmania ...........................................................................................................................2 Tasmanian Road Safety Strategy ...............................................................................................................2 Speed zoning principles ...............................................................................................................................3 Key factors in setting speed limits ..............................................................................................................3 Types of speed limits ...................................................................................................................................5 Notes on typical applications ......................................................................................................................5 Lengths of speed limits ................................................................................................................................8 Signing of speed limits ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • West Tamar Highway, Cormiston Road to Legana (Legana Park Drive), Highway Duplication
    2004 (No. ) 2004 _______________ PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA _______________ PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS West Tamar Highway, Cormiston Road to Legana (Legana Park Drive), Highway Duplication ______________ Presented to His Excellency the Governor pursuant to the provisions of the Public Works Committee Act 1914. ______________ MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY Mr Harriss (Chairman) Mr Best Mr Hall Mrs Napier Mr Sturges By Authority: Government Printer, Tasmania 00000 INTRODUCTION To His Excellency Mr Richard William Butler, Companion of the Order of Australia, Governor in and over the State of Tasmania and its Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR EXCELLENCY The Committee has investigated the following proposal: - West Tamar Highway, Cormiston Road to Legana (Legana Park Drive), Highway Duplication and now has the honour to present the Report to Your Excellency in accordance with the Public Works Committee Act 1914. Background The planning for the construction of a dual carriageway on the West Tamar Highway from the end of the existing dual carriageway at Cormiston Creek to Legana commenced in the mid 1980’s. In 1992 the Committee gave approval for the first stage of the works to construct a dual carriageway from Cormiston Creek to Danbury Drive (South). Construction works on the first stage of the works (from Cormiston Creek to Danbury Drive (South)) were delayed due to continuing consolidation of the soft sediments on which the dual carriageway was to be built. The consolidation of the soft sediments has been monitored on a continuing basis to determine when the first stage works can be commenced.
    [Show full text]
  • 12511713-SHEG-FINAL West Tamar Highway Corridor Study
    West Tamar Highway – Launceston to Legana – Interim Community Corridor Study August 2020 Consultation and Feedback Report Document title 1 Contents Interim Community Consultation and Feedback Report ........................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Project overview ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Related projects .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Consultation objectives ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Change in consultation strategy due to COVID-19............................................................................................................. 34 Project Working Group ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 Project location ..............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rebuilding Tasmania Infrastructure Investment
    Rebuilding Tasmania Infrastructure Investment June 2020 Housing 1,000 Social Housing Dwellings - $100 million The Government will invest an additional $100 million under new agreements with Community Housing Providers to deliver up to an additional 1,000 new social houses. This investment complements, but is additional to, targets and actions in the Affordable Housing Action Plan 2019 – 2023. Construction Value (est) $300 million Fast-tracking 220 Affordable Houses - $24 million The Government will bring forward funding of $14 million and provide new funding of $10 million to deliver 220 new social houses by 2022 – a year earlier than planned. These homes are part of a 300 home Community Housing Grants program funded by savings from the Commonwealth Housing Debt Waiver Agreement, with additional funds to enable early delivery. This investment complements, but is additional to, targets and actions in the Affordable Housing Action Plan 2019 – 2023. Construction Value (est) $66 million Expanded HomeShare Program - $9.3 million HomeShare reduces the initial cost of buying a house and the monthly cost of owning it. The Scheme opens the door to home ownership for those who have enough income to make the step but need a helping hand. Eligibility for HomeShare is based on income and asset limits and includes all existing Housing Tasmanian tenants. To stimulate a greater take-up of HomeShare, the Government will revise the eligibility thresholds for HomeShare. Income eligibility limits will be increased by up to 15 per cent and the maximum financial asset limit will also be increased to $100,000 to increase the number of households who can use HomeShare.
    [Show full text]
  • About RACT Have Your Say: “The RACT Stands Ready to Work with the Government on Identifying the Most Appropriate Spending Prio
    “The RACT stands ready to work with the government on identifying the most appropriate spending priorities ...” Harvey Lennon RACT CEO About RACT Have your say: The RACT enjoys a trusted position and extensive market penetration in the community with more than Phone: 13 27 22 190,000 Tasmanians as members. Email: [email protected] The RACT employs between 420-500 Tasmanians (subject to seasonal requirements) in its core functions of roadside assist, hotel and accommodation services, insurance, travel and its statewide retail network. Social: #KeepTasmaniaMoving It is the largest and strongest member organisation in Tasmania. Formed in 1923, the RACT is an apolitical Member Hub: hub.ract.com.au and independent transport infrastructure, road safety, tourism and mobility advocate. It is committed to supporting and furthering the interests of Tasmanians and does this through a comprehensive program of consultation, education, awareness and public advocacy. TASMANIAN ROAD FUTURES FUNDING PRIORITIES 2018 & BEYOND Road Funding Commitments Road Funding Priorities 2018 2018 Bass Highway 10 Year Plan State Funding State Funding onwards onwards 1 Christmas Hills Greater Hobart Traffic Vision $30.8M Exeter and Batman highway overtaking 2 Parramatta Creek Inner Hobart improvements, incident response & feasibility Batman Highway widening studies 3 Upgraded Wynyard intersections Motor Road improvement Launceston Traffic Vision $35.1M 4 Wynyard to Marrawah South East Traffic $21M Invermay, Batman Highway, Launceston Couplet, Goderich/ Greater Hobart
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetted High Productivity Vehicle Network Strategy
    Gazetted High Productivity Vehicle Network Strategy Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Tasmanian Gazetted HPV Network Strategy DIER has recently reviewed Tasmania’s High Productivity Vehicle Network in line with a recently developed set of guidelines for road geometry for High Productivity Vehicle routes. The results of this review are presented in the Review of the Gazetted High Productivity Vehicle Network report. This Strategy accompanies the network review, and outlines how the Tasmanian Government will manage the Gazetted HPV Network (as described in Schedule 1 of the Vehicle Operations Notice 2010). 1. Role of High Productivity Vehicles in moving freight across Tasmania The High Productivity Vehicle network is an important part of Tasmania’s transport system. A transport system that facilitates efficient freight movement is vital for Tasmania, as business and industry is reliant on efficient road and rail linkages to ports to access larger interstate and international markets. Due to the Tasmania’s physical separation from external markets via Bass Strait, Tasmania’s exporters and importers alike must use multiple transport modes. This makes the time and cost of freight movement critical to their ability to compete in an increasingly competitive global marketplace. Since their introduction to Tasmania in 1993, the use of High Productivity Vehicles has contributed greatly to reducing freight costs for Tasmanian businesses, by enabling the movement of larger quantities of freight per vehicle which in turn has reduced factors such as fuel consumption, driver demand, road impact, vehicle emissions and truck trips. What are High Productivity Vehicles? Heavy vehicles that use Tasmania’s road network come in a wide range of vehicle types and trailer combinations.
    [Show full text]
  • West Tamar Highway: Launceston to Legana Corridor Study
    West Tamar Highway: Launceston to Legana Corridor Study RACT Submission to Department of State Growth May 2020 The Royal Automobile Club of Tasmania RACT enjoys a trusted position and extensive market penetration in the community. More than 200,000 Tasmanians are RACT members. Formed in 1923, RACT is an apolitical and independent transport, infrastructure, road safety, tourism and mobility advocate. It is committed to supporting and furthering the interests of Tasmanians and does this through a comprehensive program of consultation, education, awareness and public advocacy. RACT is represented in a number of stakeholder reference organisations in Tasmania and undertakes liaison with government and other groups. It also has three regional advocacy committees which are made up of local volunteers and other relevant stakeholders. RACT’s advocacy activity is defined by a series of public policy documents developed and endorsed by RACT’s Advocacy Committee and Board. These policies have been informed by history, experience, statistical analysis, consultation, industry knowledge and, most importantly, our members. Nationally, RACT is a constituent member of the Australian Automobile Association (AAA) which represents some 8 million Australian motorists. Internationally, RACT has joined with other Australian motoring organisations as a member of the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA) to work on road safety and related issues at a global level. West Tamar Highway: Launceston to Legana Corridor Study RACT’s Mobility Strategy The RACT Mobility Strategy contains three key pillars, which include road safety, future mobility and sustainability, with an underlying theme of representing Tasmanian road users. Within each key pillar sits RACT’s vision statements.
    [Show full text]