DOCSLIB.ORG

Mount Hope Project Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mount Hope Project Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-B010-2017-0031-EIS August 2019 MOUNT HOPE PROJECT FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT File Numbers: NVN-082096 | NVN-084632 U.S. Bureau of Land Management Mount Lewis Field Office 50 Bastian Road Battle Mountain, Nevada 89820 The estimated lead agency total costs associated with developing and producing this Draft SEIS are $132,000.00. The estimated proponent total costs associated with developing and producing this Draft SEIS are $214,561.00. MOUNT HOPE PROJECT FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Lead Agency: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Mount Lewis Field Office Cooperating Agencies: Eureka County Project Location: Eureka County, Nevada FSEIS Number: DOI-BLM-NV-B010-2017-0031-EIS Plans of Operation Numbers: NVN-082096 NVN-084632 Correspondence on this FSEIS Kevin Hurrell Should be Directed to: Planning and Environmental Coordinator Bureau of Land Management Battle Mountain District 50 Bastian Road Battle Mountain, Nevada 89820 (775) 635-4000 ABSTRACT The Bureau of Land Management Mount Lewis Field Office authorized the Mount Hope Project Record of Decision, Plan of Operations Approval, and Approval of Issuance of Right-of-Way Grants on November 16, 2012. The Mount Hope Project (Project) is located in Eureka County, Nevada, approximately 23 miles northwest of the town of Eureka, Nevada, and consists of a proposed molybdenum mine including a power transmission line, a water well field, and all associated facilities to be located on public land administered by the BLM Mount Lewis Field Office and on private land controlled by Eureka Moly, LLC. The Project will utilize an open pit mining method and will process the mined ore using a flotation and roasting process. When completed, a total of 8,618 acres of disturbance would occur within the 23,065-acre Project area. Of the 8,618 acres, 8,359 acres are on public land and 259 acres are on private land. The BLM has prepared this Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) as a response to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit remand decision for further action on issues identified in its December 28, 2016 decision. This FSEIS includes the following: 1) an explanation of the usage of baseline values of zero for several air pollutants; 2) a quantitative cumulative air quality impacts analysis; and 3) a clarification of the status of certain springs and water holes under Executive Order Public Water Reserve No. 107. Authorized Officer for FSEIS: Jon D. Sherve Field Manager Mount Lewis Field Office i MOUNT HOPE PROJECT FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Overview ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Status of the Mount Hope Project .......................................................................... 4 1.4 Purpose and Need for Action .................................................................................. 4 1.5 Authorized Officer ................................................................................................... 4 1.6 Organization of the FSEIS ...................................................................................... 4 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ............... 7 2.1 Comparative Analysis of Alternatives ................................................................... 7 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES .... 10 3.2 Water Resources – Water Quantity ..................................................................... 10 3.2.2 Affected Environment .............................................................................. 10 3.6 Air and Atmospheric Values ................................................................................. 24 4 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND IRREVERSIBLE/IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES ............................................................................. 36 4.1.1 Air Resources ............................................................................................ 36 5 CONSULTATION, COORDINATION, PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT, AND THE LIST OF PREPARERS FOR PREPARATION OF THE FSEIS .............................. 38 5.1 Public Scoping ........................................................................................................ 38 5.2 Native American Consultation.............................................................................. 38 5.3 List of Preparers .................................................................................................... 38 5.3.1 Bureau of Land Management FSEIS Team ........................................... 38 5.3.2 Third Party Contractors .......................................................................... 38 5.3.3 Partner Agencies ....................................................................................... 38 6 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 39 ii EUREKA MOLY, LLC MOUNT HOPE PROJECT FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1-1: Impact Summary and Comparison of the Approved Project and Other Alternatives ........................................................................................................ 7 Table 3.2-1: Springs that May be Affected by Project Activities ..................................... 16 Table 3.2-2: Springs Evaluated for PWR Status ............................................................... 22 Table 3.6-1: BAPC-Recommended Background Values for Criteria Pollutants ........... 24 Table 3.6-2: CO, NO2, and SO2 Monitoring Stations in Nevada ..................................... 29 Table 3.6-3: Rural CO, NO2, and SO2 Monitoring Stations in Neighboring States ....... 32 Table 3.6-4: Yosemite and White Mountain Monitored Concentrations ....................... 34 Table 4.1-1: Mount Hope Project Cumulative Modeling Analysis (µg/m3) .................... 37 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.3.1: Year 44 (Life-of-Mine) Proposed Disturbance ............................................... 6 Figure 3.2.1: Project Simulated Ten-Foot Water Table Drawdown Contours During 400 Years of Post-Mining Recovery ..................................................................... 19 Figure 3.2.2: Water Rights within the Proposed Action Simulated Maximum Extent of Ten-Foot Water Table Drawdown ................................................................ 20 Figure 3.2.3: Potentially Impacted Springs and PWR Filings in the Project Area ......... 21 Figure 3.6.1: CO, NO2, and SO2 Monitoring Stations in Nevada ..................................... 28 Figure 3.6.2: Rural CO, NO2, and SO2 Ambient Monitoring Stations in Neighboring States ................................................................................................................ 33 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Photographs of PWR 107 Springs Appendix B: BLM Checklists for PWR 107 Springs Appendix C: Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Correspondence Regarding Background Concentrations for Air Dispersion Modeling Appendix D: Public Comments and Responses iii EUREKA MOLY, LLC MOUNT HOPE PROJECT FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS µg/m3 microgram per cubic meter afy acre feet per year amsl above mean sea level BAPC Bureau of Air Pollution Control BAQP Bureau of Air Quality Planning BLM Bureau of Land Management CESA cumulative effect study area CFR Code of Federal Regulations CO carbon monoxide CR County Road DEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement DSEIS Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement EA Environmental Assessment EML Eureka Moly, LLC EO Executive Order EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement FR Federal Register FSEIS Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement gpm gallons per minute I-15 Interstate 15 KVCWF Kobeh Valley Central Well Field MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NDEP Nevada Division of Environmental Protection NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NDWR Nevada Division of Water Resources NO2 nitrogen dioxide NOA Notice of Availability NOI Notice of Intent OLM Ozone Limiting Method Pb lead Plan Mount Hope Project Plan of Operations Plan Mount Hope Project Plan of Operations Amendment and Application for Amendment Reclamation Permit Modification PM10 particulate matter less than ten micrometers in aerodynamic diameter PM2.5 particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in aerodynamic diameter ppb parts per billion iv EUREKA MOLY, LLC MOUNT HOPE PROJECT FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Project Mount Hope Project PWR 107 Public Water Reserve No. 107 RFFAs reasonably foreseeable future actions Mount Hope Project Record of Decision, Plan of Operations Approval, and ROD Approval of Issuance of Right-of-Way Grants SEIS Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement SER Significant Emission Rates SO2 sulfur dioxide SR State Route SRK SRK Consulting tpy tons per year US
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mount Hope Nurseries, Three Superb Hardy Roses
    Mount Hope Nurseries, Three Superb Hardy Roses. Attention is directed to the colored illustration on back of cover. PRICE OF F>I_HNTS: No. I. Mrs. John Laing (see page 151) ©ach 75c No. 2. Earl of Dufferin (see page 148) - " 75c No. 3. Marshall P. Wilder (see page 150) " 5°c THE SET FOR $1.50. For New and Rare Fruits, and Ornamental Trees and Shrub*, see Index pages 157 and 158. TKBLB OF5 CONTENTS. Advice to Correspondents 6 Articles by mail 6 Brief suggestions to Planters - 47 Bulbs, Miscellaneous 129 Bulbs, Summer and Autumn Flowering 128 Business Announcement 4 Cannas - 180 Catalogues 160 Chrysant hemums - 130 Clematis 106 Climbing and Trailing Shrubs -- 106 Conifer® 75 Dahlias 130 Deciduous Trees -- 49 " " flowering 74 " " having bright colored bark in winter 74 " " possessing remarkable characteristics of foliage 73 " " producing ornamental fruit 74 " select assortments at reduced prices 74 " Weeping... 72 Deciduous Shrubs... 81 " " producing ornamental fruit 103 " select assortments at reduced prices 103 " " with variegated foliage 102 Esculent Roots 45 Evergreen Shrubs 105 Evergreen Trees _ 75 Fruit Department 7 Hardy Herbaceous Flowering Plants 114 Hedge Plants 109 Hints on Transplanting . 7 Hollyhocks 114 Index, General 159 Index to New and Rare Trees and Shrubs, to which especial attention is requested 157 Miscellaneous Fruits 45 Ornamental Department 47 Packing Season 6 Pajonies, Herbaceous 110 Tree 110 Phloxes 113 Rose Department. _ 131 Roses, New Varieties 134 Scions 45 Special attention is invited to our select assortments of Deciduous Trees and Shrubs at reduced prices, pages 74 and 103. NOTE: The illustrations in this Catalogue are mostly from specimens in our collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyses of Rocks and Minerals
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director / rf Bulletin 878 ANALYSES OF ROCKS AND MINERALS FROM THE LABORATORY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1914-36 TABULATED BY ROGER C. WELLS Chief Chemist UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1937 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. ------ Price 15 cents V CONTENTS Page Introduction._____________________________________________________ 1 The elements and their relative abundance.__________________________ 3 Abbreviations used._______________________________________________ 5 Classification.___________________________________________________ 5 Analyses of igneous and crystalline rocks____-_________.._____________ 6 Alaska._____-_____-__________---_-_--___-____-_____-_________ 6 \ Central Alaska________________________________________ 6 Southeastern Alaska___________-_--________________________ 7 Arizona._________--____-_---_-------___-_--------_----_______ 8 Ajo district.-_--_.____---------______--_-_--__---_______ 8 Oatman district____________-___-_-________________________ 9 Miscellaneous rocks....-._...._-............_......_._.... 10 Arkansas.____________________________________________________ 11 Austria._____________________________________________________ 11 California.__,_______________--_-_----______-_-_-_-___________ 11 T ' Ivanpah quadrangle.____-_----__--_____----_--_--__.______ 11 Lassen Peak__________________ ___________________________ 12 Mount Whitney quadrangle________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Hope 43-101 Feasibility Study 2013
    M3‐PN130154 Effective Date: January 15, 2014 Issue Date: January 15, 2014 Mount Hope Project Form 43-101F1 Technical Report Feasibility Study Eureka, Nevada REVISION 0 Prepared For: Qualified Persons: Conrad E. Huss, P.E., Ph.D. Robert Davidson, P.E. Art S. Ibrado, Ph.D. Daniel Roth, P.E. John M. Marek, P.E. M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation ● 2051 West Sunset Road, Tucson, AZ 85704 ● 520.293.1488 MOUNT HOPE PROJECT FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT DATE AND SIGNATURES PAGE The issue date of this Report is January 15, 2014. The effective date of this Report is January 15, 2014. The effective date of the Mineral Reserve estimate is December 14, 2013. See Appendix A, Feasibility Study Contributors and Professional Qualifications, for certificates of Qualified Persons. These certificates are considered the date and signature of this Report in accordance with Form 43-101F1. (Signed) “Conrad E. Huss” January 15, 2014 Conrad E. Huss, P.E., Ph.D. Date (Signed) “Robert Davidson” January 15, 2014 Robert Davidson, P.E. Date (Signed) “Art S. Ibrado” January 15, 2014 Art S. Ibrado, Ph.D. Date (Signed) “Daniel Roth” January 15, 2014 Daniel Roth, P.E. Date (Signed) “John Marek” January 15, 2014 John Marek, P.E. Date M3-PN130154 15 January 2014 Revision 0 i MOUNT HOPE PROJECT FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT MOUNT HOPE PROJECT FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT FEASIBILITY STUDY EUREKA, NEVADA TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE DATE AND SIGNATURES PAGE ..................................................................................................... I TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Topographic Branch (Division)
    History of the Topographic Branch (Division) Circular 1341 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Rodman holding stadia rod for topographer George S. Druhot near Job, W. Va., 1921. 2 Report Title John F. Steward, a member of the Powell Survey, in Glen Canyon, Colorado River. Shown with field equipment including gun, pick, map case, and canteen. Kane County, Utah, 1872. Photographs We have included these photographs as a separate section to illustrate some of the ideas and provide portraits of some of the people discussed. These photographs were not a part of the original document and are not the complete set that would be required to appropriately rep- resent the manuscript; rather, they are a sample of those available from the time period and history discussed. Figure 1. The Aneroid barometer was used to measure differences in elevation. It was more convenient than the mercurial or Figure 2. The Odometer was used to measure distance traveled by counting the cistern barometer but less reliable. revolutions of a wheel (1871). Figure 3. The Berger theodolite was a precision instrument used Figure 4. Clarence King, the first Director of the U.S. Geological for measuring horizontal and vertical angles. Manufactured by Survey (1879–81). C.L. Berger & Sons, Boston (circa 1901). Figure 6. A U.S. Geological Survey pack train carries men and equipment up a steep slope while mapping the Mount Goddard, California, Quadrangle (circa 1907). Figure 5. John Wesley Powell, the second Director of the U.S. Geological Survey (1881–94). Figure 8. Copper plate engraving of topographic maps provided a permanent record.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of the Weminuche Wilderness
    Weminuche Wilderness Trip Planning Resources, and Map Backpackers pause to take in the views on the Continental Divide Trail, Weminuche Wilderness, Colorado The Weminuche Wilderness Wilderness Rules With nearly 500 thousand of federally protected wilderness and Regulations peaks, forests, and alpine tundra, the Weminuche is the largest wilderness area in Colorado. Capped with snowy peaks that feed Group size: the tributaries of the Colorado River, the San Juan mountains that Maximum group size is 15 people per group, with a maxi- mum combination of people and stock not to exceed 25. form the heart of the wilderness are as rugged as the Colorado Rockies ever get. Every year, climbers scale its craggy peaks and Travel and Equipment: outdoorsmen and women pitch their tents in it’s green alpine -- Possession of motorized equipment and mechanized valleys, and anglers try their luck in its cold mountain streams. means of transport are not permitted. Use of motor vehicles, bicycles, wagons, hang gliders, carts, chainsaws, or other motorized equipment is not permitted. The Weminuche wilderness area is located near the towns of -- To lessen erosion, shortcutting of switchbacks is pro- Durango, Pagosa Springs, Creede, and Silverton in southwest- hibited. ern Colorado. The wilderness contains popular Chicago Basin, -- Use of aircraft to land or drop people or materials is prohibited, with the exception of agency-approved with it’s three fourteeners Mt. Eolus, Sunlight and Windom Peak administrative use or emergency search-and-rescue as well as scenic points such as The Window, Pigeon and Tur- operations. ret Peaks and portions of the rugged Colorado and Continental Divide Trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle's View of San Juan Mountains
    Eagle’s View of San Juan Mountains Aerial Photographs with Mountain Descriptions of the most attractive places of Colorado’s San Juan Mountains Wojtek Rychlik Ⓒ 2014 Wojtek Rychlik, Pikes Peak Photo Published by Mother's House Publishing 6180 Lehman, Suite 104 Colorado Springs CO 80918 719-266-0437 / 800-266-0999 info@mothershousepublishing.com www.mothershousepublishing.com ISBN 978-1-61888-085-7 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced without permission in writing from the copyright owner. Printed by Mother’s House Publishing, Colorado Springs, CO, U.S.A. Wojtek Rychlik www.PikesPeakPhoto.com Title page photo: Lizard Head and Sunshine Mountain southwest of Telluride. Front cover photo: Mount Sneffels and Yankee Boy Basin viewed from west. Acknowledgement 1. Aerial photography was made possible thanks to the courtesy of Jack Wojdyla, owner and pilot of Cessna 182S airplane. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Section NE: The Northeast, La Garita Mountains and Mountains East of Hwy 149 5 San Luis Peak 13 3. Section N: North San Juan Mountains; Northeast of Silverton & West of Lake City 21 Uncompahgre & Wetterhorn Peaks 24 Redcloud & Sunshine Peaks 35 Handies Peak 41 4. Section NW: The Northwest, Mount Sneffels and Lizard Head Wildernesses 59 Mount Sneffels 69 Wilson & El Diente Peaks, Mount Wilson 75 5. Section SW: The Southwest, Mountains West of Animas River and South of Ophir 93 6. Section S: South San Juan Mountains, between Animas and Piedra Rivers 108 Mount Eolus & North Eolus 126 Windom, Sunlight Peaks & Sunlight Spire 137 7. Section SE: The Southeast, Mountains East of Trout Creek and South of Rio Grande 165 9.
    [Show full text]
  • A Route for the Overland Stage
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All USU Press Publications USU Press 2008 A Route for the Overland Stage Jesse G. Petersen Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs Part of the Creative Writing Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Petersen, J. G. (2008). A route for the overland stage: James H. Simpson's 1859 trail across the Great Basin. Logan: Utah State University Press. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact digitalcommons@usu.edu. 6693-6_OverlandStageCVR.ai93-6_OverlandStageCVR.ai 5/20/085/20/08 10:49:4010:49:40 AMAM C M Y CM MY CY CMY K A Route for the Overland Stage Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division. Colonel James H. Simpson shown during his Civil War service as an offi cer of the Fourth New Jersey infantry. A Route for the Overland Stage James H. Simpson’s 1859 Trail Across the Great Basin Jesse G. Petersen Foreword by David L. Bigler Utah State University Press Logan, Utah Copyright ©2008 Utah State University Press All rights reserved Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84322-7800 www.usu.edu/usupress Manufactured in the United States of America Printed on recycled, acid-free paper ISBN: 978-0-87421-693-6 (paper) ISBN: 978-0-87421-694-3 (e-book) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Petersen, Jesse G.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Hope and Buffalo Bill Cody
    MOUNT HOPE AND largest newspaper chain; Myron Holley, the BUFFALO BILL CODY constructor of the Erie Canal; Lewis Henry Morgan, founder of the science of By Milos Andjelic anthropology; Col. Nathaniel Rochester, founder of the city; Hiram Sibley, who Having the first of the great American founded Western Union and persuaded Czar Municipal Victorian cemeteries in the Alexander to sell Alaska to the U.S.; Margaret neighborhood gives an excellent opportunity Woodbury Strong, and many others. for examining gravestones and funerary architecture. With the current size of 196 acres What surprised me and attracted my attention and 14-and-a-half miles of road winding was the fact that Buffalo Bill’s children are through its unique and picturesque burial buried in Mount Hope Cemetery. How did it ground, Mount Hope is one of the most come to be that three children of the western beautiful and enchanting cemeteries in showman are buried there? The story begins America. When all the available plots in the Portrait of the young Buffalo Bill Cody, signed on February 26, 1846, in LeClaire, Iowa, old Buffalo Street burying ground were taken “Yours Truly, W. F. Cody, Buffalo Bill”. where William F. Cody was born. His family after a cholera epidemic in Rochester in 1832, soon moved west. In Fort Laramie, Wyoming, the city acquired 54 acres of thick woods and Buffalo Bill and his Wild West Show 12-year-old William met the Indian scouts Kit inaccessible hills and valleys one-and-a-half complement of Indians in full dress on both Carson and Jim Bridger.
    [Show full text]
  • "G" S Circle 243 Elrod Dr Goose Creek Sc 29445 $5.34
    Unclaimed/Abandoned Property FullName Address City State Zip Amount "G" S CIRCLE 243 ELROD DR GOOSE CREEK SC 29445 $5.34 & D BC C/O MICHAEL A DEHLENDORF 2300 COMMONWEALTH PARK N COLUMBUS OH 43209 $94.95 & D CUMMINGS 4245 MW 1020 FOXCROFT RD GRAND ISLAND NY 14072 $19.54 & F BARNETT PO BOX 838 ANDERSON SC 29622 $44.16 & H COLEMAN PO BOX 185 PAMPLICO SC 29583 $1.77 & H FARM 827 SAVANNAH HWY CHARLESTON SC 29407 $158.85 & H HATCHER PO BOX 35 JOHNS ISLAND SC 29457 $5.25 & MCMILLAN MIDDLETON C/O MIDDLETON/MCMILLAN 227 W TRADE ST STE 2250 CHARLOTTE NC 28202 $123.69 & S COLLINS RT 8 BOX 178 SUMMERVILLE SC 29483 $59.17 & S RAST RT 1 BOX 441 99999 $9.07 127 BLUE HERON POND LP 28 ANACAPA ST STE B SANTA BARBARA CA 93101 $3.08 176 JUNKYARD 1514 STATE RD SUMMERVILLE SC 29483 $8.21 263 RECORDS INC 2680 TILLMAN ST N CHARLESTON SC 29405 $1.75 3 E COMPANY INC PO BOX 1148 GOOSE CREEK SC 29445 $91.73 A & M BROKERAGE 214 CAMPBELL RD RIDGEVILLE SC 29472 $6.59 A B ALEXANDER JR 46 LAKE FOREST DR SPARTANBURG SC 29302 $36.46 A B SOLOMON 1 POSTON RD CHARLESTON SC 29407 $43.38 A C CARSON 55 SURFSONG RD JOHNS ISLAND SC 29455 $96.12 A C CHANDLER 256 CANNON TRAIL RD LEXINGTON SC 29073 $76.19 A C DEHAY RT 1 BOX 13 99999 $0.02 A C FLOOD C/O NORMA F HANCOCK 1604 BOONE HALL DR CHARLESTON SC 29407 $85.63 A C THOMPSON PO BOX 47 NEW YORK NY 10047 $47.55 A D WARNER ACCOUNT FOR 437 GOLFSHORE 26 E RIDGEWAY DR CENTERVILLE OH 45459 $43.35 A E JOHNSON PO BOX 1234 % BECI MONCKS CORNER SC 29461 $0.43 A E KNIGHT RT 1 BOX 661 99999 $18.00 A E MARTIN 24 PHANTOM DR DAYTON OH 45431 $50.95
    [Show full text]
  • Svbordinate Lodges, I.O.O.F
    DIRECTORY OF SVBORDINATE LODGES, I.O.O.F. Class HS5ia. Book . T^S Copyright N° COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF THOMAS WILDEY THE FOUNDER OF THE NDEPENDENT ORDER OF ODD FELLOWS ON THE CONTINENT OF NORTH AMERICA PRICE, $1.SO NET ^5?is^-^^^ DIRECTORY Subordinate lodges OF THE INDEPENDENT ORDER OF ODD FELLOWS ON THE CONTINENT OF NORTH AMERICA COMPILED AND, PUBLISHED BY GEORGE H. FULLER. GRAND SECRETARY. OF MASSACHUSETTS. THE GRAND LODGe! I. O. O. FM S15 TREMONT STREET. BOSTON 1913 Copyright. 1913. by George H. Fuller THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Caustic-Claflin Company, Printers harvard Square Cambridge, Massachusetts ©CJ.A347588 It PREFACE THIS book contains the name, number and location of approximately 17,500 Subordinate Lodges of the Independent Order of Odd Fellows on the Conti- nent of North America, revised to March 20, 1913. The copy was furnished by the Grand Secretaries of the fifty- six Grand Lodges in the United States of America and Dominion of Canada. It is the purpose of the Directory to aid lodges in com- municating one with another. A message transmitted by mail as first-class matter, bearing the name, number and location of any lodge, will be delivered without additional address on the part of the writer. For example, a letter addressed to California Lodge, No. 1, I.O.O.F., San Fran- cisco, California, will be delivered to said lodge, the Post- master at San Francisco supplying the necessary informa- tion as to post-office box or street address of the lodge or Recording Secretary thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranger District Leadville National Forest San
    ied t esDparm to grculture u ric Ag of nt rtme a Dep s te Sta d U nite 370000 380000 390000 400000 R82W 106°30'0"W R81W 106°22'30"W R80W 106°15'0"W R79W 106°7'30"W Forest Service Forest PURPOSE AND CONTENTS OPERATOR R78W Eagle River H M 19 u 21 a CO LO RADO 2016 RADO LO CO 20 24 22 m OF THIS MAP k reek y Crystal Peak W e C f b ) e h ct l hit ra o u RESPONSIBILITIES ney C r lc ata C C w g Father Dyer Peak 23 re 23 e u Mount Powell e ak G e C ) k t Tenmile Creek r 24 s r 19 21 24 r 19 20 e e ) 20 22 C e Operating amotor vehicle onNational Forest 21 20 22 om d r 19 e 21 The designations shown onthis motor vehicle travel 24 19 20 o Ranch Creek23 ulch e k H Y 24 Kok G e Systemroads, National Forest System trails, and in Lime Creek omo k map(MV Twere M) made by the responsible official 21 22 Gulch 23 Pacific Peak heep Cross Creek East Fork Eagle River S areasonNational Forest System lands carries a fic Cre ) pursuanttoareCFR36 212.51; effective as ofthe date aci e Slim Jim Gulch F P k r greaterresponsibility than operating that vehicle ain e SUMMIT COUNTY onthe front cover ofthis MV Tandremain M; will effectin n ch untilsuperseded by the nex year's t MV T M.
    [Show full text]