[ 2003 ] Part 1 Chapter 6 Middle East
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Occupied Palestinian Territory (Opt) OPT 20 December 2002
9 – 18 December 2002 OCHA occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) OPT 20 December 2002 OCHA oPt, INSIDE www.reliefweb.int/hic-opt Phone/Fax +972 2 589 0459 Overview [email protected] Curfews & Closure c/o UNRWA, West Bank House & Land Destruction PO Box 19149 Jerusalem Humanitarian Access Labour Children Overview Health The newly-established Humanitarian and Emergency Policy Food Assistance Group (HEPG) in the oPt (EU/EC Chair: Norway/UNSCO; Water vice-chair: USAID/US/World Bank) held its inaugural meeting on Thursday 12 December. The objectives of the HEPG are to develop and update a coherent donor strategy for the current emergency and consider relevant policy options. The HEPG will report to the Local Aid Coordinating Committee (LACC) members on its findings and will meet fortnightly. UNRWA held a memorial at its West Bank field office on 13 December, in memory of the UNRWA staff who have lost their lives during the current conflict. In all, six UNRWA staff members have been killed by the IDF in 2002. Two staff members were shot on duty: Kamal Salem while driving in a well lit and marked UN ambulance in Tulkarm; and Iain Hook who was inside the UNRWA compound in Jenin refugee camp. In a meeting with Israeli Defence Minister Shaul Mofaz in New York on 16 December, the United Nations Secretary-General, Kofi Annan reiterated that he expected a thorough investigation of Mr. Hook's killing from the Israeli government, and that the United Nations would be provided with a written report. A draft UN Security Council resolution sponsored by Syria, which condemned recent Israeli actions in the oPt, including the killings of UN staff, was defeated on 20 December by the United States casting a no vote and effectively vetoing the text. -
Working Against Racism from White Subject Positions: White Anti-Racism, New Abolitionism & Intersectional Anti-White Irish Diasporic Nationalism
Working Against Racism from White Subject Positions: White Anti-Racism, New Abolitionism & Intersectional Anti-White Irish Diasporic Nationalism By Matthew W. Horton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Dr. Na’ilah Nasir, Chair Dr. Daniel Perlstein Dr. Keith Feldman Summer 2019 Working Against Racism from White Subject Positions Matthew W. Horton 2019 ABSTRACT Working Against Racism from White Subject Positions: White Anti-Racism, New Abolitionism & Intersectional Anti-White Irish Diasporic Nationalism by Matthew W. Horton Doctor of Philosophy in Education and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory University of California, Berkeley Professor Na’ilah Nasir, Chair This dissertation is an intervention into Critical Whiteness Studies, an ‘additional movement’ to Ethnic Studies and Critical Race Theory. It systematically analyzes key contradictions in working against racism from a white subject positions under post-Civil Rights Movement liberal color-blind white hegemony and "Black Power" counter-hegemony through a critical assessment of two major competing projects in theory and practice: white anti-racism [Part 1] and New Abolitionism [Part 2]. I argue that while white anti-racism is eminently practical, its efforts to hegemonically rearticulate white are overly optimistic, tend toward renaturalizing whiteness, and are problematically dependent on collaboration with people of color. I further argue that while New Abolitionism has popularized and advanced an alternative approach to whiteness which understands whiteness as ‘nothing but oppressive and false’ and seeks to ‘abolish the white race’, its ultimately class-centered conceptualization of race and idealization of militant nonconformity has failed to realize effective practice. -
Building a Protective Wall Around Terrorists
Fordham International Law Journal Volume 28, Issue 3 2004 Article 10 Building a Protective Wall Around Terrorists – How the International Court of Justice’s Ruling in The Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Made the World Safer for Terrorists and More Dangerous for Member States of the United Nations Rebecca Kahan∗ ∗ Copyright c 2004 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj Building a Protective Wall Around Terrorists – How the International Court of Justice’s Ruling in The Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Made the World Safer for Terrorists and More Dangerous for Member States of the United Nations Rebecca Kahan Abstract Part I of this Note will examine two recent actions in the war against international terror- ism: the Israeli plan to build a separation barrier between Israel and the OPT, and the invasion of Afghanistan during Operation Enduring Freedom. Part II will discuss two important deviations by the ICJ from past interpretation of international law that were announced in the advisory proceed- ings against Israel: a new elucidation by the ICJ regarding principles of judicial propriety and a new analysis of the abilities of States to act in self-defense under Article 51 of the U.N. Charter. Part III will address the impact on the international community’s fight against terrorism, and the role of the ICJ as an international entity. BUILDING A PROTECTIVE WALL AROUND TERRORISTS HOW THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE'S RULING IN THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WALL IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY MADE THE WORLD SAFER FOR TERRORISTS AND MORE DANGEROUS FOR MEMBER STATES OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rebecca Kahan* INTRODUCTION The nature of the threats posed to States has changed since the adoption of the U.N. -
A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH
HUMAN RIGHTS A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution Copyright © 2021 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-900-1 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org APRIL 2021 ISBN: 978-1-62313-900-1 A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution Map .................................................................................................................................. i Summary ......................................................................................................................... 2 Definitions of Apartheid and Persecution ................................................................................. -
The Wall's Impact in the Occupied West Bank: a Bayesian Approach To
econometrics Article The Wall’s Impact in the Occupied West Bank: A Bayesian Approach to Poverty Dynamics Using Repeated Cross-Sections Tareq Sadeq 1,2 and Michel Lubrano 2* ID 1 Department of Economics, Birzeit University, Birzeit, West Bank 627, Palestine; [email protected] 2 Aix-Marseille Univ., CNRS, EHESS, Centrale Marseille, AMSE, Ilot Bernard Dubois, 5 Bd Maurice Bourdet, 13001 Marseille, France * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-413-55-25-57 Received: 3 December 2017; Accepted: 22 May 2018; Published: 30 May 2018 Abstract: In 2002, the Israeli government decided to build a wall inside the occupied West Bank. The wall had a marked effect on the access to land and water resources as well as to the Israeli labour market. It is difficult to include the effect of the wall in an econometric model explaining poverty dynamics as the wall was built in the richer region of the West Bank. So a diff-in-diff strategy is needed. Using a Bayesian approach, we treat our two-period repeated cross-section data set as an incomplete data problem, explaining the income-to-needs ratio as a function of time invariant exogenous variables. This allows us to provide inference results on poverty dynamics. We then build a conditional regression model including a wall variable and state dependence to see how the wall modified the initial results on poverty dynamics. We find that the wall has increased the probability of poverty persistence by 58 percentage points and the probability of poverty entry by 18 percentage points. Keywords: Bayesian inference; pseudo panels; data augmentation; walls; poverty dynamics JEL Classification: C11; C33; I32; O15 1. -
Shot in the Head
If Americans Knew Gabrielle Giffords, Tom Hurndall and Palestinian Children Shot in the Head By Alison Weir, Executive Director of If Americans Knew, January 14, 2011 here is something particularly horrifying when someone house. Yaser, 11, died of head wounds from an IDF rubber-coat- is shot in the head. Perhaps it’s the gruesome image, the ed bullet fired at close range during a demonstration…1 Tdestruction of the brain, the clear intent to kill. The Imagine if these names were Bobby… Michael… Susan... recent shooting of Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords Melissa… Jimmy… and that the foreign troops killing them is made even more nightmarish by the location of her devastat- were invading Arizona, Connecticut, Ohio... ing injury. I remember seeing one little brain-dead boy when I was in Those of us who focus on Israel-Palestine are acutely aware Gaza in February of 2001; long before any rockets had been of this horror. fired out of this already assaulted enclave. It’s not a sight you Several years ago, I was researching the cause of death of forget, regardless of the name or nationality. Palestinian children killed by Israeli forces during the first A 2009 article in the UK Telegraph entitled “Bullets in the months of the Second Intifadah, the Palestinian uprising against brain, shrapnel in the spine: the terrible injuries suffered by chil- Israeli occupation. As I counted up the numbers, I was chilled dren of Gaza,” investigated a situation in which doctors at a to discover that the single most frequent cause of death in those hospital near Gaza were “almost overwhelmed by the number beginning months was “gunfire to the head.” of Palestinian children needing treatment for bullet wounds to In the past 10 years Israeli forces have killed at least 255 their heads.”2 Palestinian minors by fire to the head, and the number may The article began: “On just one day last week staff at the El- actually be greater, since in many instances the specific bodily Arish hospital in Sinai were called to perform sophisticated location of the lethal trauma is unlisted. -
Delegation of the European Union
European Union UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL 17th Session (30 May - 17 June 2011) ______ Item 7 ______ Statement by H.E. Ambassador András DÉKÁNY Permanent Representative of Hungary to the United Nations Office in Geneva on behalf of the European Union Geneva, 14 June 2011 Check against delivery Geneva, 14 June 2011 UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL 17th Session (30 May – 17 June 2011) EU Statement General Debate Item 7 Mr President, I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union. The fundamental changes across the Arab world have made the need for progress on the Middle East Peace Process all the more urgent. Recent events have indeed shown the necessity of heeding the legitimate aspirations of peoples in the region, including those of Palestinians for statehood, and of Israelis for security. Within the context of its ongoing engagement, the EU is deeply concerned about the continuing stalemate in the Peace Process and calls for the urgent resumption of direct negotiations leading to a comprehensive solution on all tracks. Our goal remains a just and lasting resolution to the Israeli- Palestinian conflict, with the State of Israel and an independent, democratic, contiguous, sovereign and viable State of Palestine, living side by side in peace and security and mutual recognition. A way must be found through negotiations to resolve the status of Jerusalem as the future capital of two States. Recalling the Berlin Declaration, the EU reiterates its readiness to recognize a Palestinian State when appropriate. Justice, rule of law and respect for international human rights and international humanitarian law are the cornerstones of peace and security. -
Peace Wall Or Separation Barrier?
KS3 Citizenship and politics – Difference and diversity Peace Wall or Separation Barrier? Aim: Looking Deeper • Growing trust and respect to overcome fear and hatred Peace walls At various times in very recent history, right up to the present day, ‘Peace Fences’ or ‘Separation Barriers’ or ‘Apartheid Walls’ have Introduction been erected in different parts of the world. Many are not very far from England! Alexandra Park You may want to illustrate this assembly with The Berlin Wall was built in 1961 by the photos of the various ‘separation walls and German Democratic Republic (also known in fences’ mentioned in the outline. Pictures of all the UK as East Germany, belonging to the of them are freely available on the internet. Soviet block after World War II). In West Imagine the scene in Alexandra Park in Germany, it was known as the ‘Wall of Shame’. It was built ostensibly ‘to protect the people’ Belfast; a three metre high fence divides the from the Western influences which were grass, gardens and play areas in two. corrupting them and preventing the Catholic children playing in one part of the establishment of a socialist state. The Berlin Park can see through the fence to where Wall was a massive concrete barrier, nearly four their Protestant neighbours play in a metres high (imagine that!) stretching for different part of the Park. On one side is the nearly 100 miles, with armed guards in towers at intervals along it. This ‘Iron Curtain’ as it was mainly Catholic area of Antrim Road, and on also known, cut the city of Berlin into two the other is the mainly Protestant area of parts. -
•'1!; MOV ?52002 Jli,1;
'Xj! " ~ "; •'1!; MOV ?52002 jli,1; LETTER TO UK Please find attached the draft of a letter from the Secretary-General to_ Foreign Minister Jack Straw concerning the death of the UNRWA staff memberj)fUK nationality. eran Prendergast November 2002 2fe^ /Y/A1 - // NOV 2 7 r? r . UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES POSTAL ADDRESS - ADRESSE POSTALE UNITED NATIONS. N.Y 10017 CABLE ADDRESS - AORESSE TELEGRAPHIQUE: UNATIONS NEWYORK EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL CAB NET DU SECRETAIRE GENERAL REFERENCE: 22 November 2002 Excellency, I would be grateful if you could kindly forward the enclosed letter to His Excellency The Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, MP, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. A copy of the letter is attached for your information. Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration. S. Iqbal Riza Chef de Cabinet His Excellency Sir Jeremy Greenstock, KCMG Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom to the United Nations New York ' THE SECRETARY-GENERAL 22 November 2002 Excellency, I write to convey my deep sadness on the untimely death of Mr. Iain Hook, the project manager of the Jenin rehabilitation project of United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), who was killed earlier today during Israeli Defence Forces' (IDF) operations in the Jenin refugee camp. I issued a statement on this tragedy earlier today which I attach. Please convey these sentiments to Mr. Hook's family. Though the full circumstances surrounding this tragic incident have not yet been established, I am especially concerned that IDF soldiers denied immediate access for the ambulance summoned by UNRWA to evacuate Mr. -
Security Council Provisional Fifty-Eighth Year
United Nations S/PV.4685 Security Council Provisional Fifty-eighth year 4685th meeting Thursday, 16 January 2003, 10 a.m. New York President: Mr. De La Sablière ................................. (France) Members: Angola .......................................... Mr. Gaspar Martins Bulgaria ......................................... Mr. Tafrov Cameroon ........................................ Mr. Mana Chile ........................................... Mr. Valdés China ........................................... Mr. Chen Xu Germany ........................................ Mr. Pleuger Guinea .......................................... Mr. Traoré Mexico .......................................... Mrs. Arce de Jeannet Pakistan ......................................... Mr. Mahmood Russian Federation ................................. Mr. Konuzin Spain ........................................... Mr. Arias Syrian Arab Republic ............................... Mr. Wehbe United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ..... Mr. Thomson United States of America ............................ Mr. Williamson Agenda The situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the interpretation of speeches delivered in the other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of a member of -
The UN, the ICJ, the Separation Barrier
THE UN, THE ICJ AND THE SEPARATION BARRIER: WAR BY OTHER MEANS Gerald M. Steinberg* This article compares the Hobbesian realist and Kantian idealist analyses of international law and organizations with respect to the UN General Assembly resolutions and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) advisory opinion on Israel’s separation barrier. From the realist perspective, this case highlights the exploitation of moral claims in support of a particularist political agenda. In contrast, the idealist approach interprets the advisory opinion and resolutions as important normative expressions in the developing global system of governance based on universal human rights principles and treaty obligations. The analysis begins with a detailed comparison of the ideological and intellectual foundations of these core approaches to international law and organizations, the evolution of this debate in the post Cold War international system, and the impact on protracted ethno-national conflicts. This provides the basis for examining the impact of both schools in the context of the Arab-Israeli conflict. The specific case of the UN and ICJ’s involvement in the question of Israel’s separation barrier is then analyzed in detail from both the realist and idealist perspectives. The implications of this debate are of major importance, not only with respect to the specific challenges posed by terrorism and the necessary responses, but also in the wider context of the crisis in the international system at the beginning of the 21st century. The analysis concludes by noting the degree to which this case illustrates a wider process in which international legal principles are manipulated in a manner that contributes to conflict and justification of violence, conforming to the realist interpretation. -
Table of Contents Children and Terrorism
Arna’s Children A Study Guide Compiled by Roberta McNair for the California Film Institute A Place in the World Table of Contents Children and terrorism .................................................................................................. 3 Objective .................................................................................................................... 3 An allegory for the Israeli-Palestinian question ......................................................... 3 About the Film .............................................................................................................. 4 Arna’s Children: How the children of a Palestinian theater group got involved in the Intifadah ............................................................................................................... 4 Subjects for Discussion and Research ........................................................................ 4 About the Directors ...................................................................................................... 6 Subjects for Discussion and Research ........................................................................ 7 Background on Jenin ..................................................................................................... 8 Subjects for Discussion and Research ...................................................................... 11 The “Battle of Jenin” ................................................................................................... 12 The Battle ................................................................................................................