• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

FERMILAB-PUB–18–008T OUTP-17-17P Inertial Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Quantum Scale Invariance 1, 2, 3, Pedro G. Ferreira, ∗ Christopher T. Hill, † and Graham G. Ross ‡ 1Astrophysics, Department of Physics University of Oxford, Keble Road Oxford OX1 3RH 2Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA 3Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, 1 Keble Road Oxford OX1 3NP (Dated: November 1, 2018) Weyl invariant theories of scalars and gravity can generate all mass scales spontaneously, initi- ated by a dynamical process of “inertial spontaneous symmetry breaking” that does not involve a potential. This is dictated by the structure of the Weyl current, Kµ, and a cosmological phase during which the universe expands and the Einstein-Hilbert effective action is formed. Maintaining exact Weyl invariance in the renormalized quantum theory is straightforward when renormalization conditions are referred back to the VEV’s of fields in the action of the theory, which implies a con- served Weyl current. We do not require scale invariant regulators. We illustrate the computation of a Weyl invariant Coleman-Weinberg potential. I. INTRODUCTION presently follow the condensed matter parlance, where spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) represents the difference between an “ordered” state from an “disor- The discovery of the Higgs boson with the appearance dered” one. Initially, we expect local fluctuations in of a fundamental, point-like, scalar field, unaccompanied fields that break scale, e.g., nonzero φ (x) or ∂φ (x), etc. by a natural custodial symmetry, has led many authors i i These are analogous to local magnetic spins in a macro- in search of new organising principles to turn to scale scopic spin system at high temperature and they do break symmetry. In particular, Weyl symmetry [1] in conjunc- scale symmetry locally, but they do not represent an or- tion with gravity may provide a modern context for fun- dered state. For that we need an “order parameter” that damental scalar fields and a foundational symmetry for evolves to become macroscopically constant in space and physics [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Scale or Weyl symmetry, like time, like the constant magnetization in the spin system many of the flavour symmetries seen in nature, must be as it cools to the groundstate. The order parameter must broken. Often this breaking is treated spontaneously, im- capture any and all symmetry breaking. plemented for scale invariant potentials via the Coleman Weinberg (CW) mechanism of dimensional transmuta- In the present paper, working in a “Jordan frame” we tion [8]. identify the conserved Weyl current Kµ. We find that in In this paper we focus on the well known Weyl current any Weyl invariant theory this current is always a deriva- which has been studied by many of the previous authors tive of a scalar quantity, Kµ = ∂µK where K is the “ker- arXiv:1801.07676v3 [hep-th] 31 Oct 2018 1 listed above (e.g. see [2]). However, we emphasise that, nel.” Owing to this structure of the conserved Weyl µ underlying these ideas there is a new way to break scale current, DµK = 0, we are guaranteed that the system symmetry that does not employ a potential. While this will dynamically evolve in an expanding universe such that scale charge density will evolve to zero, K 0. mechanism is implicit in the many approaches taken to 0 → spontaneously generating the Planck scale, it seems not This is just covariance, like the dilution of a conserved to have been codified prior to ref [7]. This mechanism is electric charge density or a magnetic field during general a direct consequence of the structure of the Weyl scale expansion. current. We call this inertial spontaneous scale symmetry It then follows that the kernel, K K, is con- breaking. stant. Essentially all short distance initial→ scale fluctu- By inertial spontaneous scale symmetry breaking, we ations are stretched out to become a constant value of ∗Electronic address: [email protected] 1 This is a theorem, and it isn’t hard to see that it holds in R2 and †Electronic address: [email protected] Weyl gravity generalizations, but the proof is beyond the scope ‡Electronic address: [email protected] of our present discussion. 2 K = K, and the scale symmetry is broken. K is the define the final theory and its symmetries. Though it order parameter of the SSB since it intimately connects may be convenient, one need not deploy a regulator that with the dynamics. At late times we have, for N-fields, is consistent with the symmetries of the renormalised the- K( φ )= K( φ ) exp(σ/f) . Here σ is the dilaton and ory. The nonexistence of a symmetry in the regulator { i} { i} K( φi ) is a constraint that reduces the N fields φi to does not imply the nonexistence of the symmetry in the N { 1} fields constrained to a locus in field space, such{ } as renormalised theory. Furthermore, physics should not the− ellipse of [2]. depend upon the choice of regulator [9]. We clearly see that K is the order parameter because In this view, Weyl symmetry is central and all mass the decay constant of the dilaton is precisely f = √2K, scales must emerge by way of random initial conditions in analogy to fπ in a chiral Lagrangian, or the VEV of the governing VEV’s (Vacuum Expectation Values) of fields Higgs in the standard model. The constraint of constant that are entirely contained within the action. Essentially K( φi ) gurantees that the dilaton fluctuation is orthog- there exist no fundamental mass scales, and the mass of onal{ in} the kinetic terms to the other N 1 constrained anything is defined only relative to field VEV’s in the fields and neatly factorizes. − theory. For this to be phenomenologically acceptable it We emphasize that this is a dynamical process. Just is necessary to explain how the spontaneous breaking of as steam can condense into water, a scale disordered Weyl symmetry can lead to a period of inflation followed phase can condense into a scale ordered one. All of this by a reheat phase and transition in the infrared to a is tracked in a single frame, which begins as a Jordan theory describing the fundamental states of matter and frame. In this view the universe is a physical system their interactions with an hierarchically large difference that starts in one phase, which has no scale ordering, between the Planck scale and the electroweak breaking and ends up in another in which the scale SSB defined scale. by K. This is treated in one set of “frame variables” Remarkably it has been shown in a simplified model with an Friedman-Roberston-Walker metric. In a sense involving two scalar fields that this structure is possible the approach of K K is just the relaxation of the dila- [2, 3, 7]. The model has a scale invariant scalar potential ton σ 0, though→ the dilaton can only be defined in the and non-minimal coupling of the scalar fields to the Ricci broken→ phase of the theory. scalar. When the fields develop VEVs the Planck scale Here we need not do the Weyl transformation along is generated spontaneously in the Brans-Dicke manner. the way and the SSB materializes dynamically. How- For a wide range of the non-minimal couplings and scalar ever, at late times the dynamically generated K can then interactions, there is an initial period of “slow-roll” in- be matched to the scale quantities, MP , Λ, etc., in an flation that can give acceptable values for the slow-roll Einstein-Hilbert action. Once these scales are identified, parameters. This is followed by a “reheat” phase and a then it is useful to make a Weyl transformation, e.g., flow of the field VEVs to an infrared fixed point at which using K, to isolate the dilaton. This guarantees that the ratio of the scalar field VEVs are determined by the the dilaton factorizes and alleviates any putative messy dimensionless couplings of the theory. Thus it is possible kinetic term mixing issues. (in fact, this permits the to arrange an hierarchically large ratio for the VEVs and, dilaton to be “eaten” by a Higgs mechanism if we in- interpreting the second scalar as modelling the Standard troduce Weyl’s photon, Aˆµ as in Section II.D, allowing Model Higgs boson, this large ratio corresponds to the the Weyl photon and dilaton to decouple as very heavy ratio between the Planck scale and the electroweak scale. states.) There does then remain a mixing issue amongst In section II we discuss the mechanism of inertial spon- the remaining N 1 constrained fields, and these must taneous symmetry breaking and conservation of the Weyl be diagonalized to− apply the low energy dynamics. current in a toy model, and general N-scalar models. As The advantage of phrasing things in terms of conserved it does not involve a potential the mechanism opens a currents is that the results are model independent. We new pathway to generating spontaneous scale symme- never have to actually construct and solve difficult non- try breaking and the associated spontaneous breaking of linear partial differential equations of motion to see this; other symmetries. As such it may be useful for novel as- this will happen automatically, and the resulting mass pects of model building. We also discuss a general feature scales, including the Planck mass, are generated sponta- of this mechanism, the origin of the dilaton and its inti- neously, controlled by the Weyl current. This mechanism mate relationship to the current, We also briefly consider, does not depend upon a potential, (though the particu- as an aside, locally Weyl invariant models in which the lar final vacuum state is dictated by a potential).

Load more

  12

Copy Link