DOCSLIB.ORG

SEP-HCP Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SEP-HCP Conservation Plan FINAL FINAL NOVEMBER 13, 2015 BOWMAN PROJECT NO. 005520-01-001 SOUTHERN EDWARDS PLATEAU HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN PREPARED FOR COUNTY OF BEXAR INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT 233 N. PECOS, SUITE 420 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78207 PREPARED BY BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD. 3101 BEE CAVE ROAD, SUITE 100 AUSTIN, TX 78746 WITH JACKSON WALKER LLP ZARA ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC WENDELL DAVIS AND ASSOCIATES M.E. ALLISON & ASSOCIATES FINAL SOUTHERN EDWARDS PLATEAU HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN BOWMAN © 2015 PROJECT NO. 005520-01-001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WHAT IS THE SOUTHERN EDWARDS PLATEAU HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN? The Southern Edwards Plateau Habitat Conservation Plan (“SEP-HCP” or the “Plan”) is a way for Bexar County and the City of San Antonio (the “Permittees”) to assist with compliance of the Endangered Species Act. These compliance issues threaten the economic growth of the greater San Antonio region. The purposes of the SEP-HCP are to: (1) Promote regional conservation; (2) Provide support for Camp Bullis; (3) Involve local stakeholders in conservation planning; (4) Streamline endangered species permitting; (5) Implement locally appropriate and cost-effective permitting and conservation strategies; and (6) Leverage available resources. Upon approval of the SEP-HCP by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (the “Service”), a 30-year Incidental Take Permit (ITP) under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) would be issued. The Permit would authorize a limited amount of “incidental taking” of nine federally listed endangered species (the “Covered Species”) within the jurisdictions of Bexar County and the City of San Antonio. In return, the SEP-HCP will promote the conservation of the Covered Species and related natural resources in Bexar County and other counties of the Southern Edwards Plateau. This 7-county region is the SEP-HCP “Plan Area.” WHAT SPECIES ARE ADDRESSED BY THE SEP-HCP? The Covered Species include the following nine federally listed endangered species: Golden-cheeked Warbler1 (Setophaga chrysoparia, “GCW”) Black-capped Vireo (Vireo atricapilla, “BCV”) Covered Karst Invertebrates: o Government Canyon Bat Cave Spider (Neoleptoneta microps) o Madla Cave Meshweaver (Cicurina madla) o Braken Cave Meshweaver (Cicurina venii) o Government Canyon Bat Cave Meshweaver (Cicurina vespera) o Rhadine exilis (a beetle with no common name) o Rhadine infernalis (a beetle with no common name) o Helotes Mold Beetle (Batrisodes venyivi) HOW MUCH IMPACT TO THE COVERED SPECIES WOULD BE AUTHORIZED? Future land use changes over the next 30 years, such as development or construction activities, are expected to cause the loss and/or degradation of habitat for the Covered Species. The SEP-HCP is designed to offset the impacts associated with up to 9,371 acres of GCW habitat loss, 2,640 acres of BCV habitat loss, and 21,086 acres of development activity over potential habitat for the Covered Karst Invertebrates (i.e., the level of requested incidental take authorization). 1 The North American Checklist Committee of the American Ornithologist’s Union (AOU) published a change to the scientific name of the GCW in the 52nd Supplement to the AOU Checklist of North American Birds (Chesser et al. 2011). The scientific name for the GCW was changed from Dendroica chrysoparia to Setophaga chrysoparia. FINAL 11/13/2015 PAGE i FINAL SOUTHERN EDWARDS PLATEAU HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN BOWMAN © 2015 PROJECT NO. 005520-01-001 This level of incidental take authorization represents approximately 50 percent of the projected habitat losses for the GCW and BCV and approximately 20 percent of the projected impacts to potential habitat for the Covered Karst Invertebrates within Bexar County or the City of San Antonio for the next 30 years. WHO MAY USE THE SEP-HCP? Landowners, developers, Bexar County, the City of San Antonio, and others conducting non- federal activities within the jurisdictions of Bexar County or the City of San Antonio (excluding any portion of Comal County) may be eligible to achieve ESA compliance through the Plan. Those that complete the enrollment process become SEP-HCP “Participants.” Participation in the SEP-HCP will be a completely voluntary process and other options for ESA compliance are available. Potential Participants (or “Applicants”) wishing to obtain ESA compliance through the SEP-HCP submit an application to the Permittees. The application requires the submittal of biological information pertaining to the Covered Species within, and to the extent reasonably available, adjacent to the Applicant’s project area (the “Enrolled Property”). The SEP-HCP will apply a pre-determined set of impact and mitigation formulas to determine the fees needed to offset anticipated direct and indirect impacts to the Covered Species. Applicants that provide the assessed fees (or provide acceptable preserve land in lieu of fees), complete the enrollment process, and abide by the terms and conditions of their Participation Agreements may rely on the regulatory assurances provided by the SEP-HCP’s ITP. WHAT ARE THE MINIMIZATION AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GCW AND BCV? Direct Impacts are generally assumed to apply to all areas of GCW or BCV habitat within the boundaries of an Enrolled Property and will be assessed two acres of mitigation for each acre of impact (a 2:1 mitigation ratio) (see Section 3.2.3 for additional information). Indirect Impacts are generally assumed to apply to all areas of GCW or BCV habitat within 300 feet outside of the boundaries of an Enrolled Property and will be assessed one-half acre of mitigation for each acre of impact (a 0.5:1 mitigation ratio) (see Section 3.2.3 for additional information). Initial mitigation fee is anticipated to be $4,000 per acre of mitigation (i.e., $8,000 per acre of direct impact) or, under certain circumstances, may provide acceptable preserve land in lieu of fees. Fees are subject to change with appropriate notice by the Permittees. Enrolled Participants will also be required to comply with seasonal clearing and construction limitations and oak wilt prevention measures within their Enrolled Property. WHAT ARE THE MINIMIZATION AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COVERED KARST INVERTEBRATES? Avoidance of occupied karst features by establishing a 750-ft no-disturbance buffer generally2 around the feature entrance (approximately 40 acres; the “Occupied Cave Zone”) until certain 2 The Permittees will work with willing Participants in designing the Occupied Cave Zone to minimize impacts and maximize conservation of the karst feature(s). FINAL 11/13/2015 PAGE ii FINAL SOUTHERN EDWARDS PLATEAU HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN BOWMAN © 2015 PROJECT NO. 005520-01-001 Conservation Baselines are achieved. The Conservation Baselines are derived from the Service’s recovery standards for downlisting each of the Covered Karst Invertebrates. The SEP-HCP will not offer karst Participation Agreements until the Permittees have secured some level of up-front mitigation for each of the Covered Karst Invertebrates (see Section 4.5.3 for more details). The level and type of mitigation obtained for each species will likely vary (see Section 7.0 for more detail). The Permittees will work with the Service in determining when the appropriate level of up-front mitigation has occurred. Avoidance of Service-designated Critical Habitat unless the Service determines, on a case-by- case basis, that Applicant activities will not adversely modify such habitat. If access to an Occupied Cave Zone is allowed, Applicants will be assessed a flat fee to conduct activities within the zone. Initial mitigation fee is anticipated to be as follows: - Occupied Cave Zone B (750 – 345 ft from entrance) = $40,000 - Occupied Cave Zone A (345 – 0 ft from entrance) = $400,000 - Applicants may also provide acceptable preserve land in lieu of fees - Fees are subject to change with appropriate notice by the Permittees. Within an Enrolled Property, impacts to Covered Species within karst features discovered during construction will be automatically covered for incidental take if certain procedures are followed. Participants will not be required to provide any additional mitigation or engage in any additional consultation with the Permittees or the Service. WHAT CONSERVATION MEASURES WILL THE SEP-HCP IMPLEMENT? The Permittees will use collected mitigation fees, available non-federal grants, and public funds to acquire lands or perpetual conservation easements on properties within the 7-county Plan Area that meet certain design criteria and help achieve the biological goals and objectives of the Plan. The acquisitions of these real property interests will only be from willing landowners that voluntarily agree to convey such interests. Conservation actions must be completed before a corresponding amount of participation can be allowed to occur through the Plan. At full implementation, the SEP-HCP preserve system would include: A minimum of 23,430 acres of GCW preserve lands; A minimum of 6,600 acres of BCV preserve lands; and A minimum of 1,000 acres of preserve lands for the Covered Karst Invertebrates. The SEP-HCP includes measures for adaptive management and monitoring of the preserve lands in perpetuity. The SEP-HCP also provides for research on the Covered Species and includes education and outreach programs. The SEP-HCP conservation program also seeks to improve the status of several other “Voluntarily Conserved Species” that may share similar habitats as the Covered Species. HOW MUCH WILL THE SEP-HCP COST AND HOW WILL THESE COSTS BE COVERED? The total estimated cost to implement the SEP-HCP over 30 years, assuming the Plan is fully implemented at an even rate and costs inflate by 3 percent per year, is approximately $299.5 million. FINAL 11/13/2015 PAGE iii FINAL SOUTHERN EDWARDS PLATEAU HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN BOWMAN © 2015 PROJECT NO. 005520-01-001 Approximately 57 percent of the costs are related to the purchase of the preserve system and another 38 percent of the costs are related to the management and monitoring of the preserve system (including the creation of a non-wasting management endowment).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden
    Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden George Retseck Objectives • Learn about Spiders as Animals • Learn to recognize common spiders to family • Learn about spider ecology • Learn to Collect and Preserve Spiders Kingdom - Animalia Phylum - Arthropoda Subphyla - Mandibulata Chelicerata Class - Arachnida Orders - Acari Opiliones Pseudoscorpiones Araneae Spiders Arachnids of Illinois • Order Acari: Mites and Ticks • Order Opiliones: Harvestmen • Order Pseudoscorpiones: Pseudoscorpions • Order Araneae: Spiders! Acari - Soil Mites Characteriscs of Spiders • Usually four pairs of simple eyes although some species may have less • Six pair of appendages: one pair of fangs (instead of mandibles), one pair of pedipalps, and four pair of walking legs • Spinnerets at the end of the abdomen, which are used for spinning silk threads for a variety of purposes, such as the construction of webs, snares, and retreats in which to live or to wrap prey • 1 pair of sensory palps (often much larger in males) between the first pair of legs and the chelicerae used for sperm transfer, prey manipulation, and detection of smells and vibrations • 1 to 2 pairs of book-lungs on the underside of abdomen • Primitively, 2 body regions: Cephalothorax, Abdomen Spider Life Cycle • Eggs in batches (egg sacs) • Hatch inside the egg sac • molt to spiderlings which leave from the egg sac • grows during several more molts (instars) • at final molt, becomes adult – Some long-lived mygalomorphs (tarantulas) molt after adulthood Phenology • Most temperate
    [Show full text]
  • Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan
    Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan March 2008 Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan BEXAR COUNTY KARST INVERTEBRATES DRAFT RECOVERY PLAN Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico March 2008 Approved: ___DRAFT_______________________________________ Regional Director, Southwest Region Date U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Concur: __DRAFT____________________________________________ Executive Director Date Texas Parks and Wildlife Department ii Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that the best available science indicates are necessary to recover or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), but are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans are guidance and planning documents only. Identification of an action to be implemented by any private or public party does not create a legal obligation beyond existing legal requirements. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement that any Federal agency obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act (U.S.C. 1341) or any other law or regulation. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the Service. They represent the official position of the Service only after the plan has been signed by the Regional Director as approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnida: Araneae) from the Middle Eocene Messel Maar, Germany
    Palaeoentomology 002 (6): 596–601 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ Short PALAEOENTOMOLOGY Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Communication ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) PE https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.6.10 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7F92F14-A680-4D30-8CF5-2B27C5AED0AB A new spider (Arachnida: Araneae) from the Middle Eocene Messel Maar, Germany PAUL A. SELDEN1, 2, * & torsten wappler3 1Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 1475 Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA. 2Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. 3Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, Friedensplatz 1, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] The Fossil-Lagerstätte of Grube Messel, Germany, has Thomisidae and Salticidae (Schawaller & Ono, 1979; produced some of the most spectacular fossils of the Wunderlich, 1986). The Pliocene lake of Willershausen, Paleogene (Schaal & Ziegler, 1992; Gruber & Micklich, produced by solution of evaporites and subsequent collapse, 2007; Selden & Nudds, 2012; Schaal et al., 2018). However, has produced some remarkably preserved arthropod fossils few arachnids have been discovered or described from this (Briggs et al., 1998), including numerous spider families: World Heritage Site. An araneid spider was reported by Dysderidae, Lycosidae, Thomisidae and Salticidae (Straus, Wunderlich (1986). Wedmann (2018) reported that 160 1967; Schawaller, 1982). All of these localities are much spider specimens were known from Messel although, sadly, younger than Messel. few are well preserved. She figured the araneid mentioned by Wunderlich (1986) and a nicely preserved hersiliid (Wedmann, 2018: figs 7.8–7.9, respectively). Wedmann Material and methods (2018) mentioned six opilionids yet to be described, and figured one (Wedmann, 2018: fig.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NATURAL HISTORY and TAXONOMY O F CICURINA BRYANTAE EXLINE (ARANEAE, AGELENIDAE ) R. G. Bennett
    Bennett, R. G. 1985. The natural history and taxonomy of Cicurina bryantae Exline (Araneae, Agelen- idae). J. Arachnol ., 13 :87-96 . THE NATURAL HISTORY AND TAXONOMY O F CICURINA BRYANTAE EXLINE (ARANEAE, AGELENIDAE ) R. G. Bennett Department of Biolog y Western Carolina University Cullowhee, North Carolina 28723 ABSTRACT Since its description in 1936 Cicurina bryantae Exline has been rarely collected . The recen t discovery of the microhabitat preference of this spider has allowed the observation and collection o f substantial numbers of specimens . The following account is compiled from these data . The natural history of the species is discussed (including the interesting tubular retreat constructs inhabited by immatures and adults) . Both sexes are described and figured (the male for the first time) . INTRODUCTION In 1936 Harriet Exline described a new species in the genus Cicurina Menge, 1869 on the basis of female specimens collected at Newfound Gap on the Tennessee-North Caro- lina border in 1930 by Nathan Banks . She named the species bryantae in honor of Eliza- beth Bangs Bryant who was at that time working at the Museum of Comparative Zoology where the specimens were deposited . Since that date, Cicurina bryantae has rarely been collected, its behavior and life history have not been recorded, and the male has not been described . Chamberlin and Ivie (1940) redescribed the female and mentioned two more female s captured by Ivie in 1933 in East Tennessee . Apparently no other specimens were col- lected until 1972 when J. O. Howell found an undescribed Cicurina male in a pitfall trap set in Union County, Georgia .
    [Show full text]
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List
    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).
    [Show full text]
  • Karst Invertebrates Taxonomy
    Endangered Karst Invertebrate Taxonomy of Central Texas U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Rd. Suite #200 Austin, TX 78758 Original date: July 28, 2011 Revised on: April 4, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 ENDANGERED KARST INVERTEBRATE TAXONOMY ................................................. 1 2.1 Batrisodes texanus (Coffin Cave mold beetle) ......................................................................... 2 2.2 Batrisodes venyivi (Helotes mold beetle) .................................................................................. 3 2.3 Cicurina baronia (Robber Baron Cave meshweaver) ............................................................... 4 2.4 Cicurina madla (Madla Cave meshweaver) .............................................................................. 5 2.5 Cicurina venii (Braken Bat Cave meshweaver) ........................................................................ 6 2.6 Cicurina vespera (Government Canyon Bat Cave meshweaver) ............................................. 7 2.7 Neoleptoneta microps (Government Canyon Bat Cave spider) ................................................ 8 2.8 Neoleptoneta myopica (Tooth Cave spider) .............................................................................. 9 2.9 Rhadine exilis (no common name) .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae (Spider) Photos
    Araneae (Spider) Photos Araneae (Spiders) About Information on: Spider Photos of Links to WWW Spiders Spiders of North America Relationships Spider Groups Spider Resources -- An Identification Manual About Spiders As in the other arachnid orders, appendage specialization is very important in the evolution of spiders. In spiders the five pairs of appendages of the prosoma (one of the two main body sections) that follow the chelicerae are the pedipalps followed by four pairs of walking legs. The pedipalps are modified to serve as mating organs by mature male spiders. These modifications are often very complicated and differences in their structure are important characteristics used by araneologists in the classification of spiders. Pedipalps in female spiders are structurally much simpler and are used for sensing, manipulating food and sometimes in locomotion. It is relatively easy to tell mature or nearly mature males from female spiders (at least in most groups) by looking at the pedipalps -- in females they look like functional but small legs while in males the ends tend to be enlarged, often greatly so. In young spiders these differences are not evident. There are also appendages on the opisthosoma (the rear body section, the one with no walking legs) the best known being the spinnerets. In the first spiders there were four pairs of spinnerets. Living spiders may have four e.g., (liphistiomorph spiders) or three pairs (e.g., mygalomorph and ecribellate araneomorphs) or three paris of spinnerets and a silk spinning plate called a cribellum (the earliest and many extant araneomorph spiders). Spinnerets' history as appendages is suggested in part by their being projections away from the opisthosoma and the fact that they may retain muscles for movement Much of the success of spiders traces directly to their extensive use of silk and poison.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Spider of the Genus Cicurina from a Limestone Cave on Minami-Daito-Jima Island, Okinawa, Japan
    Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. A, 43(2), pp. 81–86, May 22, 2017 A new spider of the genus Cicurina from a limestone cave on Minami-daito-jima Island, Okinawa, Japan 1Matsuei Shimojana and 2Hirotsugu Ono 1 2–21–1, Jitchaku, Urasoe-shi, Okinawa 901–2122, Japan (previously at Faculty of Education, Ryukyu University) 2 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4–1–1, Amakubo, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki 305–0005, Japan E-mail: [email protected] (Received 17 March 2017; accepted 22 March 2017) Abstract A new species of the genus Cicurina Menge, 1871 (Araneae, Cicurininae) is described from Hoshino-do Cave on Minami-daito-jima Island, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan, under the name of Cicurina hoshinonoana sp. nov. The new species is closely related to Cicurina maculifera Yaginuma, 1979 known from Katano-do Cave, Shibushi-cho, Kagoshima Prefecture, southern Kyushu, but differs from the latter by the shape of the male palpal organ and the structure of female genitalia. Eyes of males of the new spider show degeneration. Key words: Araneae, Cicurininae, new species, Hoshino-do Cave, Okinawa, Japan. Minami-daito-jima is an oceanic island in the Islands (Shimojana, 1977). western Pacific 360 km east of Okinawajima Cicurina spiders weave small sheet webs with Island, Japan. The island is small with an area of a tubular retreat in fallen leaves or in crevices on 30 square kilometers and very flat, with the high- the ground as well as in caves. The genus is com- est point only 75 m above sea level. The Daito posed of 129 species distributed in the Northern Islands, to which Minami-daito-jima belongs, are Hemisphere (WSC, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Reprint Covers
    TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM Speleological Monographs, Number 7 Studies on the CAVE AND ENDOGEAN FAUNA of North America Part V Edited by James C. Cokendolpher and James R. Reddell TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM SPELEOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, NUMBER 7 STUDIES ON THE CAVE AND ENDOGEAN FAUNA OF NORTH AMERICA, PART V Edited by James C. Cokendolpher Invertebrate Zoology, Natural Science Research Laboratory Museum of Texas Tech University, 3301 4th Street Lubbock, Texas 79409 U.S.A. Email: [email protected] and James R. Reddell Texas Natural Science Center The University of Texas at Austin, PRC 176, 10100 Burnet Austin, Texas 78758 U.S.A. Email: [email protected] March 2009 TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM and the TEXAS NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78705 Copyright 2009 by the Texas Natural Science Center The University of Texas at Austin All rights rereserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including electronic storage and retrival systems, except by explict, prior written permission of the publisher Printed in the United States of America Cover, The first troglobitic weevil in North America, Lymantes Illustration by Nadine Dupérré Layout and design by James C. Cokendolpher Printed by the Texas Natural Science Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas PREFACE This is the fifth volume in a series devoted to the cavernicole and endogean fauna of the Americas. Previous volumes have been limited to North and Central America. Most of the species described herein are from Texas and Mexico, but one new troglophilic spider is from Colorado (U.S.A.) and a remarkable new eyeless endogean scorpion is described from Colombia, South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Meso-Mammal Cave Use and North American Porcupine
    MESO-MAMMAL CAVE USE AND NORTH AMERICAN PORCUPINE HABITAT USE IN CENTRAL TEXAS A Dissertation by ANDREA ELISA MONTALVO Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Roel R. Lopez Committee Members, Nova J. Silvy Susan M. Cooper Rusty A. Feagin Head of Department, Michael P. Masser May 2017 Major Subject: Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Copyright 2017 Andrea Elisa Montalvo ABSTRACT Meso-mammals are frequent cave visitors whose role in cave ecology is poorly understood. Understanding meso-mammal cave use is essential because caves are often managed for United States federally endangered, cave-obligate arthropods. My objectives for this study were to quantify annual meso-mammal cave visitation, determine behaviors of meso-mammals while in the caves, to develop multinomial regression to determine which variables best differentiate caves use by each species, and to determine how North American porcupines incorporate caves into their home range and habitat use. North American porcupines (Erethizon dorsatum) were the most common cave visitor (64%), followed by raccoons (Procyon lotor; 14%) and Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana; 10%). These results are noteworthy because central Texas caves were historically associated with raccoons and the additional nutrient inputs of North American porcupines could facilitate replacement of cave-obligate species by more competitive, or predatory, terrestrial species. Videos recorded in cave passages showed North American porcupines used caves for denning and grooming, while Virginia opossums used caves for feeding. The strongest multinomial model showed that, compared to North American porcupine, raccoons and Virginia opossums had greater odds of using caves with gates (2.36, 4.10, respectively) and pit entrances (6.11, 2.23, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Designation of Critical Habitat for Nine Bexar County, Texas, Invertebrate Species; Proposed Rule
    Tuesday, August 27, 2002 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Nine Bexar County, Texas, Invertebrate Species; Proposed Rule VerDate Aug<23>2002 14:34 Aug 26, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\27AUP2.SGM 27AUP2 55064 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 27, 2002 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR You may also hand-deliver written movement, and loss of eyes, possibly as comments to our U.S. Fish and Wildlife an energy-saving trade-off (Howarth Fish and Wildlife Service Service’s Austin Ecological Services 1983). They may be able to survive from Field Office at the address given above. months to years existing on little or no 50 CFR Part 17 You may view comments and food (Howarth 1983). Adult Cicurina materials received, as well as supporting spiders have survived in captivity RIN 1018–AI47 documentation used in the preparation without food for about 4 months (James Endangered and Threatened Wildlife of this proposed rule, by appointment, Cokendolpher, pers. comm., 2002). and Plants; Designation of Critical during normal business hours in the While the life span of listed Texas Habitat for Nine Bexar County, Texas, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Austin troglobitic invertebrates is unknown, Invertebrate Species Ecological Services Field Office at the they are believed to live more than a above address. year based, in part, on the amount of AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill time some juveniles have been kept in Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Rbxieticanjuscum
    RbXietican1ovitatesJuscum PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N. Y. 10024 NUMBER 2539 APRIL 24, I974 Revision of Rhadine LeConte (Coleoptera, Carabidae) I. The subterranea Group BY THOMAS C. BARR, JR.1 ABSTRACT The subterranea group of Rhadine LeConte includes 11 species, five of which are regarded as polytypic. The group is restricted to limestone caves in central Texas, and all its species are troglobites. Species and subspecies treated are: subterranea subterranea (Van Dyke), new status; subterranea mitchelli, new subspecies; russelli, new species; noctivaga, new species; austinica, new species; speca speca (Barr), new status; speca gentilis, new subspecies; speca crinicollis, new subspecies; exilis (Barr and Lawrence); persephone, new species; tenebrosa tenebrosa (Barr), new status; tenebrosa mckenziei, new subspecies; insolita, new species; infernalis infernalis (Barr and Lawrence); infernalis ewersi (Barr); koepkei koepkei (Barr), new status; koepkei privata, new subspecies. Keys are provided for determining (a) species groups of Rhadine and (b) species and subspecies of the subterranea group. Rhadine LeConte includes approximately 60 species, all but three of which occur from the Great Plains westward to California and south to Oaxaca, Mexico. Members of this exclusively North American genus inhabit caves, cellars, mammal burrows, and crevices in rock piles. Eleven species are microphthalmous, cave obligate (troglobitic) forms found in the Balcones escarpment region of central Texas. These constitute an 1 Research Associate, Department of Entomology, the American Museum of Natural History; Professor of Biological Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington. ISSN 0003-0082 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 2539 apparently monophyletic assemblage, the subterranea group, which is the subject of the present paper.
    [Show full text]