FOREST CLEARANCE PROPOSAL
FOR
DADOLA FOREST AREA
In
BEAWAR BAGHANA SECTION OF NH-8 FROM KM 87.050 TO KM 88.250 IN THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
AJMER FOREST DIVISION
SUBMITTED TO
THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST & NODAL OFFICER (FCA) RAJASTHAN FOREST DEPARTMENT
GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN, VAN BHAVAN, JAIPUR
SUBMITTED BY
REGIONAL OFFICER & PROJECT DIRECTOR MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS JAIPUR
MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS (GOVERNEMNT OF INDIA)
NOVEMBER 2014
CCHHEECCKKLLIISSTT CHECK-LIST FOR PROPOSAL FOR TAKING PERMISSION FOR CONSTRUCTON AND TREE CUTTING FROM AJMER FOREST DIVISION
INDEX
Annexure Page No. of S. No. Name of the document Particulars No. No. pages Proposal is submitted for taking permission for expansion of Two Lane (with paved Shoulders) to Four Lane on existing National Highway-8 (NH-8) within existing ROW which is declared as Duly filled up Form - A for forest Protected Forest and for Tree clearance, tree cutting permission Cutting Permission within Ajmer 1 Proposal Attached 1 and for construction permission, in Forest Division (km 87.050 to km 10 7 copies. 88.250). This proposed length of about 1200 meter is passing through "Dadola Forest Area" and is within project road from Beawar (km 58.245) to Baghana (km 147.000) having total length of 88.755 km.
2 Location Map of Project Road Enclosed Annexure I 11 1
The Existing ROW is for National – Highway in the Name of President 3 Protected Forest Notification Annexure II 12 1 of India, which was subsequently notified as Protected Forest. – GT Sheet - Map showing Forest Area / Boundaries and other Annexure III 4 Enclosed 13 1 adjoining areas with their land use on 1:50000 Scale Map. – Purpose wise break up of total land Annexure - IVA 14 1 required and Strip Plan, showing Enclosed for the proposed 1200m Annexure - IVB 15 1 5 required PF area on both the sides stretch in Ajmer Forest Division. Annexure - IVC 16 1 of the road. Annexure - IVD 17 1 Certificate for the minimum use of 6 Forest land and justification for Enclosed Annexure V 18 1 locating the project on forest land – 7 Undertaking to pay the NPV Enclosed Annexure - VI 19 1 Undertaking to pay the cost of 8 Enclosed Annexure - VII 20 1 compensatory afforestation 9 Tree Cutting Details Enclosed Annexure - VIII 21 1
10 Cost of cut Trees NA Annexure Page No. of S. No. Name of the document Particulars No. No. pages Project Approval Letter from the 11 Enclosed Annexure - IX 22 1 Authority 12 Cost Benefit Analysis Enclosed Annexure X 23 7 Executive Summary of Pre 13 Information on project Annexure – XI 30 15 Feasibility Report is enclosed Clearance certificate under – Environment Protection Act Annexure XII 14 wherever necessary or copy of Enclosed 45 7
application for environment – clearance under EPA. Village Map within Ajmer district through which road is passing and showing effective area in which 15 Enclosed Annexure XIII 52 1 permission of tree cutting as well as permission of construction is – sought. 16 Status of NH-8 in Rajasthan State Enclosed Annexure XIV 53 1 Annexure XV 54 1 17 Forest Clearance Enclosed – Annexure - XVI 55 3 – 18 Affidavit Enclosed Annexure - XVII 58 2 Geo-reference boundary in shape file (kml/kmz files) and a digital Soft Copy in CD and Hard Copy 19 map along with a hardcopy duly Annexure - XVIII 60 1 Enclosed as Annexure-XVIII authenticated by competent authority
FFOORRMM--AA ((PPAARRTT II--VV)) FORM – A Form for seeking prior approval under Section 2 of the proposals by the State Governments and other authorities. PART – I (To be filled up by user agency) S.No Description Comments 1. Project Details Ministry of Road Transport & Highways (MORT&H), Government of India, has proposed to implement the development project of widening of Beawar to Baghana section of NH-8, which will be executed on Design, Build, Finance and Operation (DBFO) pattern.
Both sides of entire project road from Beawar to Baghana (section of NH-8) have been declared as Protected Forest (copy enclosed as Annexure-II).
Earlier we have proposed for forest diversion from single lane to two lane with paved shoulders for which MoEF has already granted clearance, vide letter no. 8B/U.P./08/32/2009/F.C/2425 dated 24.02.2011, for 102.612 hectare forest land for Ajmer Forest division (36.2 ha) and Rajsamand Forest division (66.412 ha). (copy of the same enclosed as Annexure-XV) Short narrative of the proposal and project/ Again, Forest Clearance has already been granted by MoEF (FC (i) scheme for which the forest Division), for diversion of 61.093 ha of forest land for Ajmer land is required. and Rajsamand Forest division, for 4 laning of Beawar to Baghana section of NH-8 from 2 lane vide letter no. F.No.8- 38/2013-FC dated 02.05.2014. (copy of the same enclosed as Annexure-XVI)
After the site inspection done by the forest officials of Ajmer Forest Division, it was concluded that road is passing through Dadola Tract which is notified Protected Forest by Government of Rajasthan, so land adjoining to the existing ROW to the proposed ROW is part of Dadola tract which could not be covered in the earlier proposal for forest clearance which was granted on 02.05.2014 and same is now taken in this proposal of land diversion for 2 lane to 4 lane. In this regard, RO, MoRT&H, has given an affidavit mentioning that a separate proposal of land diversion for this piece of forest land will be submitted separately vide letter no. RW/JAI/RJ/B-G/4-Lane/FC/20 dated 03.01.2014. (Refer Annexure-XVII)
Hence, this proposal is submitted for diversion of Dadola Forest Area from chainage km87.050 to km88.250 (1200m length), falling in the current expansion within project road from Beawar (km 58.245) to Baghana (km 147.000) having total length of 88.755 km which have already got EC and FC.
Key map (i.e. Location Plan) is enclosed as Annexure-I. Maps showing the required forestland, boundary of Map showing the forestland boundary of adjoining forest is (ii) adjoining forest on a given in Annexure-III. 1:50,000 scale map. The total estimated construction cost from km58.245 to (iii) Cost of the project km147.000 is Rs 709.50 Crore.
The proposed project is essentially a highway upgrading project and involves expansion of Two Lane (with paved Shoulders) to four lanes. Efforts have been made to keep widening within the available government land (Available RoW) from start to end of the project road section. The strip in Justification for locating the (iv) the form of notified protected forest (P.F.) exists in km 87.050 project in forest area to km 88.250 (Dadola Tract) along the project road in project Beawar-Baghana Section from km 58.245 to km 147.000 which is required for the widening. Therefore, proposal for forest clearance is submitted.
Cost benefit analysis (v) Cost benefit analysis has been enclosed as Annexure-X. (To be enclosed) – The proposed project will generate employment opportunities for the local people during the construction as well as operational phase. The construction will require approximately 200 to 300 full time workers/operators. It is Employment likely to be proposed to employ local people to the maximum extent (vi) generated. possible. In addition, future induced development of the area would result in industrialization of the region and would generate more opportunities of employment for the people of the region. Purpose Wise Break-up of Total Land Required
Existing Legal Forest chainage Length Area Status of Division (km) Forest From To (Km.) (ha) Area 1.8 Notified (LHS) Protected Purpose - wise break-up Ajmer 87.050 88.250 1.2 2. 1.8 Forest of the total land required: (RHS) Total required Protected Forest land, 3.6 (in Ha.) Bar Chart is enclosed as Annexure-IVA Strip Plan is enclosed as Annexure-IVB Typical Cross Section is enclosed as Annexure-IVC Purpose wise breakup of land as Annexure-IVD Details of displacement of 3. people due to the project if any: Total number of families (i) NIL involved in displacement Number of Schedule (ii) NIL involved in displacement caste/Schedule tribe PAP’s Rehabilitation plan. (iii) NIL (to be enclosed) Yes, Environmental Clearance has been granted by MoEF (IA- Whether clearance under III Division) for 4-laning of Beawar - Baghana section from km. Environment (Protection) 58.245 to Km 147.000 on NH-8 vide letter no. F.No.10- 4. Act, 1986 required? 42/2012-IA-III dated 21.03.2013. (Yes/No.) (Copy is enclosed as Annexure-XII)
Undertaking to bear the cost of rising and maintenance of compensatory afforestation and / or Undertaking for payment of Compensatory Afforestation has 5. penal compensatory been enclosed as Annexure-VII. afforestation as well as cost for protection and regeneration of Safety Zone, etc. as per the scheme prepared by the State Government (Undertaking to be enclosed). Details of Certificates/ Documents enclosed as 6. As per enclosed checklist. required under the instructions.
Date: Sign:
Name: PART – II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forests) State serial No. of proposal
Sr. No. Description Comments
7 Location of the project/ Scheme
(i) State / Union Territory
(ii) District
(iii) Forest Division
(iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha)
(v) Legal status of forest
(vi) Density of vegetation
(vii) Species-wise (scientific names) and diameter class wise enumeration of trees (to be enclosed. In case of irrigation – FRL-4 meter also to be enclosed.) / hydel projects enumeration at FRL… FRL... 2 meter & (viii) Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion
(ix) Approximate distance of proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest
(x) Whether forms part of National Park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, etc.
(If so, the details of the area and comments of the Chief Wild Life Warden to be annexed)
(xi) Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area if so details thereof.
(xii) Whether any protected archaeological / heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monuments is located in the area. If so, the details thereof with NOC from competent authority, if required.
8. Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency in col. 2 of Part- I is unavoidable and barest minimum for the project. If no, recommended are items-wise with details of alternatives examined.
9. Whether any work in violation of the Act has been carried out (Yes/ No). If yes, details of the same including period of work done, action taken on erring officials. Whether work in violations is still in progress.
10. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme:
(i) Details of non forest area/degraded forest are identifies for compensatory afforestation, its distance from adjoining forest, number of patches, size of each patch.
(ii) Map showing non-forest/degraded forest area identified for identified for compensatory afforestation and adjoining forest boundaries.
(iii) Detailed compensatory afforestation scheme including species to be planted, implementing agency, time schedule, cost structure, etc.
(iv) Total financial outlay for compensatory afforestation
scheme.
(v) Certificates from competent authority regarding suitability of area identified for compensatory afforestation and from management point of view. (To be signed by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest).
11 Site inspection report of the DCF (to be enclosed) especially highlighting facts asked in col. 7 (xi, xii), 8 and 9 above.
12. Division / District profile :
(i) Geographical area of the district
(ii) Forest area of the district.
(iii) Total forest area diverted since 1980 with number of
cases.
(iv) Total compensatory afforestation stipulated in the district/division since 1980 on (a) Forest land including penal compensatory afforestation. (b) Non- forest land.
(v) Progress of compensatory afforestation as on (date) ______on
(a) Forest land
(b) Non- forest land
13 Specific recommendations of the DCF for acceptance
or otherwise of the proposal with reasons.
Date:
Place:
Deputy Conservator of Forest PART – III
(To be filled by the concerned Conservator of Forests)
Sr. No. Description Comments 14. Whether site, where the forest land involved is located has been inspected by concerned Conservator of Forests agree (Yes/No) If yes, the date of inspection & observations made in form of inspection note to be enclosed. 15. Whether the concerned Conservator of Forests agree with the information given in Part – B and the recommendations of Deputy Conservator of Forests. 16. Specific recommendation of concerned Conservator of Forests for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with detailed reasons.
Date: ______
Place: Conservator of Forest
PART – IV
(To be filled in by the Nodal Officer or Principal Chief Conservator of Forests or Head of Forest department)
Sr. No. Description Comments 17. Detailed opinion and specific recommendation of the State Forest Department for acceptance of otherwise of the proposal with remarks.
Signature:
(Name)
Official Seal
Date: ______
Place:
PART – V
(To be filled in by the Secretary in charge of Forest Department or by any other authorize officer of the State Government not below the rank of an Under Secretary)
Sr. No. Description Comments 18. Recommendation of the State Government: (Adverse comments made by any officer or authority in Part B or part C or Part D
above should be specifically commented upon. – – –
Signature
(Name)
Official Seal
Date: ______
Place:
ANNEXURE
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--11 ((LLOOCCAATTIIOONN MMAAPP OOFF PPRROOJJEECCTT RROOAADD)) Project Name :Four Laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Forest Proposal :Chainage km 87.050– to km 88.250 (Dadola Forest Area)
87.050 km
Project START CH, 88.250 km BEAWAR Km 58/245
Project END CH, BAGHANA KM 147/000
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--22 ((PPRROOTTEECCTTEEDD FFOORREESSTT NNOOTTIIFFIICCAATTIIOONN))
Annexure-II
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--33 ((GGTT SSHHEEEETT))
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--44
((44AA:: BBAARR CCHHAARRTT 44BB:: SSTTRRIIPP PPLLAANN 44CC:: TTYYPPIICCAALL CCRROOSSSS SSEECCTTIIOONN 44DD:: PPUURRPPOOSSEE--WWIISSEE BBRREEAAKK UUPP OOFF LLAANNDD RREEQQUUIIRREEDD FFOORR DDIIVVEERRSSIIOONN)) Annexure-IVA
Development & Operation of Beawar to Baghana Section of NH-8 from km. 87.050 to km.88.250 into four lane in the State of Rajasthan
BAR CHART SHOWING LAND REQUIREMENT IN DADOLA FOREST AREA (PROTECTED FOREST)
BEAWAR BAGHANA KM:87.050 KM:88.250 PROPOSED ROW
15.00m 15M
07.00m
04.50m EXISTING ROW
07.00m 10M 12M 16M 30M 60M
04.50m
07.00m PROPOSED ROW
15.00m 15M
LEGEND
DIVERTED IN STAGE-1 AREA PROPOSED FOR DIVERSION DUE TO FALLING IN DADOLA TRACT
DIVERTED IN STAGE-2
OLD ROAD BEFORE NOTIFICATION Annexure-IVB
BEAWAR BAGHANA KM:87.050 KM:88.250
PROPOSED ROW PROPOSED ROW
EXISTING ROW EXISTING ROW
EXISTING ROW EXISTING ROW
PROPOSED ROW PROPOSED ROW
LEGEND
EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH
CONCENTRIC WIDENING
EXISTING ROW
ROAD SIDE PLANTATION DECLARED AS PROTECTED FOREST
CENTER LINE
PROPOSED ROW FOR FOREST CLEARANCE ONLY CLIENT: CONCESSIONAIRE: EIA CONSULTANTS: TITLE:
Department of Road Transport and Highways ITNL Road Infrastructure Development Company Limited MANTEC CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. STRIP PLAN Government of India D-36, Sector-6, Noida(U.P) KM.87.050 TO KM.88.250 DESIGN BY:
PROJECT: IL&FS Transportaion Limited DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: APPROVED BY: SCALE DATE REVISION NO. INDEPENDENT ENGINEER: Project of Development and Operation of 4-Lane SUNNY THAKUR NIRJHAR RATURI DR. V.N. SINGH NOT TO SCALE 10-09-2014 R0 Beawar-Baghana Section of National Highway No.8 Intercontinental Consultants in Rajasthan and Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. Reference Drawing:DNDA/ADV/BG-1008/2012/STRIP PLAN/04 Annexure-IVC
CENTRE LINE OF ROAD
30000
15000 7000 16000 7000 15000 (EITHER SIDE) (EITHER SIDE)
2000 1000 10000 1000 2000 CARRIAGEWAY PROPOSED FOR TWO LANE PAVED SHOULDER
PAVED PAVED SHOULDER SHOULDER EARTHEN EARTHEN 1500 1500 SHOULDER SHOULDER SELECTED EARTH SELECTED EARTH 3% 2.5% 2.5% 3%
(EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY BEFORE TWO LANING) BC DBM WMM II WMM I GSB EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY OF RIGHT EXISTING EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY OF RIGHT EXISTING PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY OF RIGHT PROPOSED SUBGRADE WAY OF RIGHT PROPOSED
G.L G.L 4500 7000 4500
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF ROAD
LEGEND Area Considered for Two lane paved shoulder :- 16.00-7.00=9.00 (4.50m. EITHER SIDE)
Area to be Considered for Four laning :- 30.00-16.00=14.00 (7.00m. EITHER SIDE) Annexure-IVD
Dadola Forest Area, Beawar-Baghana Section of NH-8 (km 87.050 to km 88.250)
Purpose-wise Breakup of Land Required for Diversion
Forest Existing Length of Exisitng Width of Width of Road Area Area Proposed Forest Land Area of Type of Legal Division Chainage Proposed ROW Road Before with Earthen Diverted Diverted ROW under Forest Land Status of Section Notification Shoulder & During During Acquisition Land Land Embankment Stage I Stage II & Proposed Required Slope Clearance Clearance for for Diversion Diversion
From To (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (ha) (km) (km)
Ajmer Notified Protected Forest 87.0588.25 1200 30 7 16 9 14 60 30 3.6 Protected Forest Divison Forest
Area of Forest Land Required for Diversion = Length of Proposed Section x Forest Land under Acquisition & Proposed for Diversion 1200 m x 30 m 36000 m2 36000 m2/10000 3.6 ha
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--55 ((CCEERRTTIIFFIICCAATTEE FFOORR MMIINNIIMMUUMM UUSSEE OOFF FFOORREESSTT LLAANNDD)) -
- ninlnum and unavoidabh due io med or widenins (evanlion ol tuo bne twnh pavcd shourdeB) b fof L'r.n sisiins NationalHigh ay.siNHS)(from kn 87060bkn 882s0) 5 b.e.enProirdBeawar,.dBashanasedionareafrllsunderAjnerFoPsDivision$36Ha i! S |USTTfiC TTOT{ FOR AREa SILECTION xiniJdy dr Rd.d rnnsnon & H ghwar (MoRr&H), Gdvernm.ntofln s rlE dalolh.nr oavrn6x NH sr.khes/.dddotr rn $. ountrr wh.E IS .Eu'.n silni cidy znd rhcE k :drv ror s{e and et rknt rh. propo!.d rrol..! ir $sc iarry a hishqay upsldrhon pbi?d,Dd S cxttins m ihycrFnsiond rwoLine (w th p:ved shouldesl6Fdn S Hishway 8 (NH 3) on horh sid6. r S hin the :v,ilabLc sovirnment land S Ar both sides or exisdns pror..t rord pa$.s through Ddola FoEn Tnd which E md i'd s pEDot.d thc Ptor..i.d Por.d by RaFnh:n cov. ror i' b n"t h. seoi.td. d$isn tldn.EB & r*\v .sp'cE or hllhwlv i3 l-R 5.nd Mlnlltrvk n.ndardt & .p.crfiedoht Th!rcror.:E ot h
Regldnal or ic.r & Projed Dlr.ctor R Mt sbv or no.d Tr:nsPot.nd lrishs.Y3 DcM, ioad, ,.lDui r.l..th2n ^jn.. trR hl'! h
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--66 ((UUNNDDEERRTTAAKKIINNGG TTOO PPAAYY TTHHEE NNPPVV)) .t prcseit v.lue for the proDo$d P dtv?n.d ror prop.sed proled would be d.po.t d as and when lne rbte 3ov.dm.nt d.mlnds th.
thE n b cenit thar r4oRT&tl, cov.nddloflndh hftbv.gres & tbide bv all rhe conditioB r.9til.r p.yndr or Nr4/ ol th. pbpoEd loE{ l.nd to b! dlved to. mn roro* putpo& a p'r rt frrr . c.{n ordd.nd rlro dwr und.dkila th.rh.!c otuDs.td evlrioi olBbr ofNr'v .F rh. dd.r otdE surBi! cout.d/o. th. ord.r of!h. cov.mn.nr t.hr wllt b. r.ld bv u, ri..ba $d .nolnr sould be deodsibd b.fore .onm.neh.nt of the :dual work dr on ddrrdotth! toEdDep, msnt
Vt R.do l ot la. r Prol.d Dlttor cov.hndr ot tdlt ilhl'ttr olaord Tdnrpod.nd sthn}' DcM, nord, ,.lD!i rt.*h.! ^1n..
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--77 ((UUNNDDEERRTTAAKKIINNGG TTOO PPAAYY TTHHEE CCOOSSTT OOFF CCOOMMPPEENNSSAATTOORRYY AAFFFFOORREESSTTAATTIIOONN)) tt h b und.rtah dat ai@rt to@r& th. cmD.erory a66tation tor lne pror6.d Pred.d F@t a@ ro he diwned for pbpGed trcI.ct wdld be d.p6ited a and rn€n li.a amnot d.h.nds r11. sn. l* I i. enit &.t l,lo!al&t. Celm.nt of lndia h.r.by .s@ to abjd. by aI $. & l!a.tdl4 D.rMt oI c@D.@toi .Foqtadoi ot tn. pDps.d Ptut cltd Erhla b L.!Frt d ld e.lor* rlr!@ a D.r rh. ord.r.ltt. Gmhmni en. tL tlc. -ld .ndnt @ld t d.p6lt d b.foE onnm.m.nr oldc..tu.1wort or o rbn ia olrh. For.$ D.D.fr.nr
i-Y ildolrr or l..ra rt#e!ff Gosllctolbd., xhr* otRddlrurpornPdrtn ryt Dcr', atn. &0.4 Frru, t lrdrr
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--88 ((TTRREEEE CCUUTTTTIINNGG DDEETTAAIILLSS)) Annexure-VIII
TREE CUTTING DETAILS
List of trees along with their diameters to be cut during widening of road from two lane to four lane on both sides of the proposed road side
Left Hand Side (LHS)
S. No. Chainage Scientific Name of Local Name Diameter (m) Distance Tree of Tree of Tree from PCL (m) 1. 87.450 km Azadirachta indica Neem 1.60 19.0 2. 87.475 km Azadirachta indica Neem 1.45 17.0 3. 87.482 km Azadirachta indica Neem 1.55 11.6 4. 87.484 km Karijya 4.10 16.2 5. 87.484 km Karijya 0.31 19.0 6. 87.484 km Karijya 0.33 19.0 7. 87.530 km Karijya 0.33 19.0 8. 87.545 km Karijya 0.30 18.5 9. 87.580 km Karijya 2.25 01.0 10. 87.585 km Karijya 0.30 04.0 11. 87.755 km Karijya 0.33 04.0 12. 87.760 km Karijya 0.37 12.0 13. 87.780 km Karijya 0.40 13.0 14. 88.000 km Karijya 0.65 13.0
Right Hand Side (RHS)
S. No. Chainage Scientific Name of Local Name Diameter (m) Distance Tree of Tree of Tree from PCL (m) 1. 87.450 km Karijya 0.31 18.0 2. 87.465 km Azadirachta indica Neem 0.34 16.0 3. 87.480 km Karijya 0.37 05.6 4. 87.505 km Karijya 0.22 08.2 5. 87.595 km Karijya 0.35 01.5 6. 87.761 km Azadirachta indica Neem 2.10 11.0 7. 88.450 km Karijya 1.10 02.0
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--99 ((PPRROOJJEECCTT AAPPPPRROOVVAALL LLEETTTTEERR FFRROOMM TTHHEE AAUUTTHHOORRIITTYY)) h r! b lndedke h.Eby rh{ GoMr.nt of lndr. ha sn.do. th. hprcwn.nt sorL (r.., .rp$rror or M tln. (wlth p.wd shoold.u) b tour rrn. or lrlrdn! rrdoMl fllshw.y-3(Nll.8)) nF adE (Lu 53ra5) to B.rt u (tE 1{7100) a.dotr of N.ddl lllrlrv.y - 0 lh lLFiL! tbr. h.ini r.d l.ndr olosrss hn tr$l.r thDuih Aln.r rnd i.tsn.id dlrtrlcr
x4con l 0f lq r Prcl*t Dlncto. Gonhnfit ot rn lr., rihkFy ot Road tnEDort Dd lllslr*.yr Dq{ ltln.r no.4 LlDut, rrllrin n
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--1100 ((CCOOSSTT BBEENNEEFFIITT AANNAALLYYSSIISS)) Annexure-X
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
1.0 Economic Analysis
1.1 General
This chapter gives Cost Benefit analysis of project road. Widening to Four lane divided carriageway of project road length, being a capital intensive project, requires to establish its economic and financial viability to ensure that the investment made would yield adequate return to the economy of a country in general and public / private investor in particular.
1.2 Methodology for Appraisal
The economic evaluation for the project has been undertaken from Beawar to Baghana Road section of NH-8 using HDM 4 software. Analysis is carried out over a period of 30 years starting from 2013 and up to year 2042. The economic evaluation has been
Benefitscarried out due for to bothcapacity Do augmentationNothing / Do Minimum of the existin andg Withroad taking Project in tosituation. consideration two alternatives as stated below are mainly by virtue of saving in vehicle operation cost, saving in travel time and other caused benefits.
Base Case: Do Minimum
With Project: Widening to 4 lane of existing road with Paved Shoulders at present
Year wise benefits accrued after deducting project cost are discounted to work out the Economic Internal Rate of Return. The financial estimates of the cost are converted to economic cost by applying a factor of 0.90.
The sensitivity analysis is carried out by varying cost and benefit as under:
a) Increase in the cost of project by 15%; b) Decrease in the benefits for the project by 15%; and c) Increase in the cost of project by 15% and decrease in the benefits by 15%.
The analysis has been done by changing the cost and benefit streams independently as well as in combination. The end results of this study have been presented in a series of EIRRs and NPVs.
1.3 Input Data for Economic Analysis
1.3.1 Road Network
It is proposed to undertake work of strengthening and widening to four lanes of existing two lane project road from Beawar to Baghana section of NH-8.
Details of Project Road
Description Length (Km)
Beawar - Bhagana (Km 58.245 to Km 147.000) 88.76
Physical characteristics data pertains to geometry i.e. rise/fall, horizontal curvature, altitude, drainage, pavement i.e. type of surface, construction and maintenance history, deflection and condition i.e. roughness, cracking, ravelling, pot holes, edge break, rut depth are derived from the field surveys and investigations, and are used in the analysis.
1.3.2 Vehicle Fleet
Vehicle fleet details have been prepared based on traffic category in classified Traffic Volume Count Survey. The basic characteristics and economic costs related to motorized vehicles used in the analysis are presented in Table below.
Annual Interest
An Economic Interest Rate of 12% has been adopted for the analysis.
Vehicle Fleet Data
Basic Characteristics Car Mini Bus Bus LCV 2-Truck 3-Truck MA-Truck A. Vehicle Characteristics Gross Vehicle Weight (t) 1.47 7.00 9.20 7.00 16.20 25.00 32.00 ESAI Factor Per Vehicle 0.10 0.20 0.50 0.20 4.60 3.80 3.80 Number of Axles 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 5.00 Number of Tyres 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 10.00 18.00 Number of Passengers 4.00 20.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B. Vehicle Utilization Data Service Life (Yr.) 12.00 12.00 10.00 12.00 10.00 10.00 12.00 Hours Driven per Yr. 1950.00 1500.00 2000.00 1600.00 2100.00 2200.00 2400.00 km Driven per Yr. 32000.00 60000.00 70000.00 60000.00 85000.00 86000.00 120000.00 Annual Interest Rate (%) 12.00 12.00 10.00 12.00 10.00 10.00 12.00 C. Economic Unit Costs New Vehicle Price (Rs.) 318,570.00 466,725.00 941,996.00 402,302.00 848,310.00 912,946.00 1,744,188.00 New Tire Price (Rs.) 1393.00 3772.00 6568.00 3773.00 7994.00 7994.00 7994.00 Maintenance Labour 20.00 25.00 30.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40 (Rs./hr.) Crew Cost (Rs./crew-hr.) 40.00 50.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 75.00 Passenger Working Time 46.00 26.00 26.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Rs./pa-hr.) Passenger Non Working 12.00 7.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Time (Rs./pa-hr.) Cargo Time (Rs./veh-hr.) 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 Petrol Price (Rs./ lt.) 38.42 Diesel Price (Rs./lt.) 33.47 Lubricants Price (Rs./kg.) 90.00
1.3.3 Construction and Maintenance Costs
Construction Cost
The cost estimate for four laning calculated based on the quantities worked out for major items of work to be executed in the project on the basis of preliminary engineering design of roads, structures and the adopted rates. A conversion factor of 0.90 has been used to convert financial cost into economic costs. Cost of land acquisition is not considered for the analysis purpose. The economic cost for four laning of Project Road is as under:
Construction Cost
Length of the Per Kilometer Construction Project Road Cost Per Kilometer Cost (Economic Cost in Rs (in Kms) (Financial) in Cost) in Rs Crores Crores Rs Crores 88.76 699 7.88 7.09
A construction period of 3 years (2013, 2014 and 2015) has been envisaged with a phasing of 30%, 45% and 25% respectively.
O&M Costs
Routine maintenance cost includes Patch Work, crack sealing, edge break and shoulder repair periodic maintenance cost include overlaying. The work items and cost for routine maintenance and periodic maintenance has been estimated and given in Table below. Operation and Maintenance Cost
Type of Maintenance/ Intervention Criteria Work Item Cost Improvement Potholes >= 5 No.s/km Patch works Rs. 90 per sqm. Wide structural cracking Cracks Sealing Rs. 90 per sqm. Routine Area >= 5% Maintenance Edge Break Area >= 5 Edge Break Rs. 100 per sqm. m2/km Repair Every 5th Year Shoulder Repair Rs. 300000 per km Thick Overlay Roughness > = 3.5 IRI 40 mm BC Rs. 375 per Sqm. Thin Overlay Roughness > = 3.5 IRI 25 mm BC Rs. 250 per Sqm.
1.3.4 Traffic
Following category of fast moving and slow moving vehicles are considered for carrying out HDM 4 Analysis.
2 Axle Truck 3 Axle Truck Multi Axle Truck LCV Bus Mini Bus Car / Jeep / Van
Percentage compositions of traffic and AADT as on year 2013 and adopted for the analysis are summarized as under:
Base Year Traffic Composition
Composition in %age AADT (in Passenger Mini Standard Multi Numbers) LCV 2-Axle 3-Axle Car Bus Bus Axle 3606 36.41 0 9.3 5.31 11.88 22.93 14.17
Traffic Diversion:
Once the project road is developed to four lane configuration then there is a possibility of Traffic Diversion from alternate road (NH-79/79A/NH-76, Kishangarh-Bhilwarda- Chittorgarh-Udaipur Section) on to NH-8 (Kishangarh-Beawar-Gomti-Udaipur) due to shorter length by around 20 KMs.
The probable traffic diversion has been estimated based on O-D surveys and diversion curve equation and presented in table below.
Diverted Traffic
Probable Traffic Diversion in the Year Vehicle Type 2016 from Alternate Road LCV 257 2-Axle Truck 118 3-Axle Truck 374 Multi Axle Vehicle 686
Traffic Growth Rates:
Traffic growth rates necessary to estimate traffic levels in future on project road are products of economic factors of the influence area and elasticity of traffic demand. The following growth rates were estimated for future traffic prediction in addition to diverted traffic. Traffic Growth Rates
Vehicle Type 2012-2016 2017-2022 2022-2027 >2027 Car Jeep 7.5 6.5 5.0 4.0 Mini Bus 4.5 4.0 3.0 2.0 Bus 4.5 4.0 3.0 2.0 LCV 7.0 6.0 4.5 3.5 2-Axle Truck 4.0 3.0 2.5 2.0 3-Axle Trucks 7.5 6.5 5.0 4.0 Multi Axle Vehicles 8.5 7.0 5.5 4.5
1.4 Results of Economic Analysis
Economic Analysis was carried out following the methodology and input data discussed in the preceding paragraphs of this chapter using HDM-4 software.
Road user cost summary per vehicle-km arrived at by running HDM-4 software for Do Minimum & with Project Scenario. . The Economic Analysis Summary with time savings is presented vide Table below
The sensitivity analysis was also conducted considering following scenarios:
Sensitivity 1: Increase in the cost of project by 15%; Sensitivity 2: Decrease in the benefits for the project by 15%; and Sensitivity 3: Increase in the cost of project by 15% and decrease in the benefits by 15%.
The EIRR and NPV at 12% discount rate as worked out with benefits due to travel time savings and sensitivity analysis results are summarized as under:
Results of Economic Analysis
NPV* @ 12% Base Economic Internal Rate of Return (%) Case (in Rs Mns) 4-Laning Sensitivity S1 Sensitivity S2 Sensitivity S3 1660.012 13.7% 12.77% 12.63% 11.75% The four laning of project road is economically viable as it yields more than 12% return (assumed interest rate for the analysis).
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--1111 ((EEXXEECCUUTTIIVVEE SSUUMMMMAARRYY OOFF PPRROOJJEECCTT)) Annexure-XI
1. Executive Summary
1.1 Introduction
Ministry of Road Transport & Highways (MORT&H), Government of India has decided to take up the development of various National Highway (NH) stretches/corridors in the country where the intensity of traffic on these highways has increased significantly and there is requirement of augmentation of capacity for safe and efficient movement of traffic. Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways has proposed to develop / implement the projects through Public Private Partnership (PPP) and accordingly taken up pre-feasibility of various sections to be executed on Design, Build, Finance and Operation (DBFO) pattern.
In pursuance of the above, ITNL Road Infrastructure Development Co. Ltd. (IRIDCL) have been appointed as Concessionaire and to prepare a pre-feasibility report for 4 laning of Beawar-Baghana section from km 58.245 to km 147.000 of NH-8 in the state of Rajasthan for Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways.
The location of the Project Road has been shown in the Key Plan.
1.2 Scope of Study
The present condition of the road is 2-lane road with paved shoulder with some 4 lane small stretches. The project road to be upgraded to 4 lane road with paved shoulder with provision of vehicular and pedestrian underpasses with junction improvement.
1.3 Project Description
The project road section lies between 73°51’32”E to 74°19’34”E longitude and 25°31’17” N to 26°04’37”N latitude. Beawar-Baghana section from km 58/245 to km 147/000 in Rajasthan is part of NH-8 from Delhi to Mumbai via Haryana, Rajasthan, Gujarat and Maharashtra. The National Highway No. 8 connects Delhi, Gurgaon, Jaipur, Ajmer, Udaipur, Ahmedabad, Vadodara and Mumbai and is about 1450 km long. The entire NH-8 highway has to be widened to 4 lane under Golden Quadrilateral Corridor of National Highway Development Project.
The climate is predominant hot and dries with 38.6OC as the mean maximum temperature and 7.8OC as minimum temperature. The maximum day temperature however sometime crosses 46OC and the minimum night temperature goes down to zero point. The average annual rainfall is 650mm. The period from December to March forms the cold season followed by hot and dry summer from April to June having transition periods monsoon period is from July to September and post- monsoon is in October and November.
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 1 – The existing carriageway is two-lane flexible pavement of 7m with 1.5m paved shoulder and 1.0m earthen shoulder at both sides except some stretches where four lane divided carriageway has been provided with 7.25m carriageway with 0.6m median and 1.0m lined drain.
As the project road connects two major cities namely Ajmer and Udaipur in the Rajasthan, all major utilities follow the road alignment. Electric and telephone lines run almost parallel to the existing road. There are few high-tension overhead power line crossings with towers located close to the existing carriageway.
Project Road Characteristics
Carria Shoulder Section Carriageway geway Type and Terrain Abutting Land Use Configuration Width Width
Plain Predominantly and agriculture land with 2 – Lane with 58/245- 147/000 rolling patches of industrial/ paved 10 m Earthen of with commercial/ built (except below) 1.0m width shoulder some up/barren/forest and hilly wild life sanctuary part area
58/000- 60/080 4 – Lane with 72/200-72/540 7.25m No earthen Predominantly carriageways shoulder. Plain/ residential/ 7.25m Only 1.0m Rolling commercial area with 74/600-75/990 both side with lined drain built-ups 0.6m median 106/600-108/400
The existing Right of Way (ROW) varies from 23 to 60.0 m width for entire length of the project road.
1.3.1 Road Junctions
The Project road has total 67 junctions including major and minor junctions with all types of crossings. Major intersections are Pali junction at km 58/400, km 64/850 and km 109/800, km 110/000, km 110/350, km 142/150 at Kamli Ghat. 1.3.2 Railway Crossings
The project road crosses Bhilwara - Pali M.G. Railway line at km 142/418. At this Railway Crossing, one span of 22.61 m (24.53 m in skew) PSC voided deck type and one span of 12.16m (13.19m in skew) RCC Solid slab is constructed. For 2 –lane ROB outer to outer width is 12 m comprising of 7.50 m carriageway, 1.5m footpath, and 0.25m for kerb and 0.5m crash barrier on outer edge of carriageway.
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 2 – The minimum vertical clearance of 7.3 m for above Railway track has been kept in view of dedicated freight corridor.
RCC circular spill through type substructure and pile foundation with 1200 mm diameter bored piles are constructed
1.3.3 Bridge & Cross Drainage Structures
There is no major bridge in Beawar – Baghana section. There are 37 minor bridges and 247 culverts provided on the project road section.
1.4 Traffic Survey Analysis and Forecast
1.4.1 Classified Continuous Volume Count Survey
The seven-day’s average classified traffic volume in terms of number of vehicles according to direction is summarized below.
Seven-Day’s Average Daily Traffic Volume ADT NOS. Vehicle Type Towards Towards Total Bhagana Beawar Car / Jeep / Van 277 341 618 etc. Local Jeep 101 118 219 Standard Bus 134 137 271 Mini Bus 5 6 11 LCV 85 113 198 2-Axle 444 477 921 3-Axle 508 403 911 Multi Axle 301 268 569 Total 3717
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 3 – 1.4.2 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) The AADT worked out after taking in to account the above seasonal factor and is presented below. Seven-Day’s Annual Average Daily Traffic Volume AADT NOS. Vehicle Type Towards Total Towards Beawar Bhagana Car / Jeep / Van 286 351 637 etc. Local Jeep 96 111 207 Standard Bus 126 129 255 Mini Bus 5 5 10 LCV 80 107 187 2-Axle 419 450 869 3-Axle 479 381 860 Multi Axle 284 252 536 Total 3561
1.4.3 Growth Rate
The Calculated growth rates for MSA estimation are given below:
Calculated Growth Rates
3 axle Year/Period Buses LCV 2 Axle Truck Truck MAV 2009 3.70 3.80 4.90 6.90 6.90
As per new circular provided by GOI, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, dated 18th January, 2008 reference no. RW/NH-37011/57/2006-PIC Minimum 5% traffic growth rate as given in approved MCA is to be considered.
Suggested Growth Rates
3 axle Year/Period Buses LCV 2 Axle Truck Truck MAV 2009-2012 5.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 7.00 2013-2017 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.50 6.50 2018-2022 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 2023-2027 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.50 5.50 2028-2030 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 4 – 1.4.4 Design Parameters – MSA Calculations
Road Name Parameter Remarks Beawar - Baghana Design Life (Years) 10 Base Year 2008 Base Year Traffic Bus LCV 2-Axle 3-Axle MAV 255 196 869 860 536 VDF Bus LCV 2-Axle 3-Axle MAV As mentioned in 0.67 0.38 4.83 2.96 1.30 DPR As mentioned in LDF 0.75 IRC: 37-2001 DDF - Design Traffic 32.40 Say 35 (CMSA)
1.5 Pavement Condition
Project road section from Beawar to Baghana of NH-8 passes through mostly plain and rolling terrain with some hilly portion from km 58/245 to km 147/000. The existing horizontal alignment and vertical alignment is to be improved at some locations. Most of the stretches of NH-8 are in good condition as the road is built recently.
1.6 Improvement Proposals:
1.6.1 Highway Design
The design speed for the project road has been proposed as 80-100 km/hour in plain and rolling terrain and 40-50 kmph in hilly terrain
1.6.2 Proposed Right of Way
The minimum right of way of 60 m width is proposed to be provided for entire length of the project road.
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 5 – 1.8.3 Horizontal and Vertical Profile
Horizontal curves to be been designed with minimum 360/400 m radius for plain/rolling terrain and 65m for mountainous terrain and vertical profile has been designed throughout the project road with maximum grade of 3.33% in plain and 5% in mountainous terrain.
1.8.4 Pavement Design
The pavement design for new pavement to be carried out as per IRC-37:2001 and overlay design as per IRC-81:1997.
The composition of profile corrective course shall be as follows as per Schedule B of Concession Agreement:
If the level difference between the undersides of total overlay thickness and existing centre line level is:
i) Up to 150 mm – PCC is by BM. ii) More than 150 mm and up to 300 mm – Dismantle the existing bituminous course and provide 75mm BM + rest with WMM as PCC. iii) More than 300 mm and up to 500 mm – Dismantle the existing bituminous course and Provide 75mm BM + 225 mm WMM + Remaining with GSB (min. 100mm) as PCC. iv) More than 500 mm – Reconstruction with new carriageway pavement thickness with dismantling of existing pavement to requisite depth. v) More than 1600mm – Reconstruction with new carriageway pavement thickness without dismantling the existing bituminous course.
1.8.5 Rigid Pavement for Toll Plaza
The rigid pavement shall be adopted at Toll plaza locations. The minimum pavement composition of the Rigid Pavement shall be, over a 500mm Subgrade of 8% CBR value for a design life of 30 years.
300 mm Pavement Quality Concrete M-40. 150 mm Dry Lean Concrete M-10. 225 mm Granular Sub-base (GSB).
The requirements given above are the minimum as per Schedule B of Concession Agreement. Any additional thickness required as per manual of specifications for four lane/IRC 58 shall be carried out in consultation with ICE. The same shall not constitute a change in scope of work.
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 6 – 1.8.6 Bus Bay/ Truck Parking Lay-bye
It is proposed to provide thickness of pavement layers same that proposed for main carriageway for bus bays and truck parking lay byes.
1.8.7 Junction Improvement
The intersections along the project road section are proposed to improve in accordance with IRC codes. The important intersections are proposed to be provided with islands and verges at centre for proper movement of diverging/ merging traffic.
In addition, improvement proposed for minor intersections is as tabulated below
List of Major Junctions
Existing Direction Major/ Type of Improvement Width S. No. Chainage Link Type Minor Junction Details (KM) (m) L/R/Cross
Channelised 1 58/400 Major Pali BT T 7 R intersection
Rajiabas- Channelised 2 64/850 Major BT + 3.32-3.50 Cross Ramgarh intersection
Jodhpur-Bhim Vehicular 3 109/800 Major BT + 3.5 Cross Village Underpass
Trimurti Channelised 4 110/000 Major BT Y 3 L Chawk intersection
5 110/350 Major Bhilwara BT T Flyover 3.5 L
6 142/150 Major Devgarh-Pali BT + Flyover 7.0-5.5 Cross
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 7 – List of Minor Junctions
Direct Existing Proposed Major Type of Sl. Improvement Widt ion Chaina Chaiange /Mino Link Junctio No. Details h (m) (L/R/ ge (Km) (Km) r ns Cross) 1 58/900 58/700 Minor Bhojpura T Left in Left out 3 R Kendriya 2 59/200 59/100 Minor T Left in Left out 3 L Vidyalaya 3 59/600 59/600 Minor Local Village T Left in Left out 3 R 4 61/100 61/000 Minor Gohana Y Left in Left out 3 L 5 61/900 61/859 Minor Local Village T Left in Left out 3 L 6 63/450 63/200 Minor Local Village T Left in Left out 3.5 R 7 63/510 63/318 Minor Bhilwara Y Left in Left out 3.5 L 8 63/700 63/552 Minor Dholadata T Left in Left out 3.5 R 9 66/950 66/572 Minor Rajiabas T Left in Left out 3 L Sarbina- 3.50- 10 68/500 68/235 Minor + Left in Left out Cross Factory 2.80 11 69/900 69/700 Minor Kabra T Left in Left out 3 R 12 72/600 72/385 Minor Sarot T Left in Left out 3 L 13 74/250 73/910 Minor Kalat Khedi T Left in Left out 3 L 14 77/300 76/900 Minor Kelok Nadi Y Left in Left out 3 R 78/815 Minor Kadaliya +stagger Left in Left out 3.5 R 15 79/200 78/900 Minor Bihar Vandota ed Left in Left out L
16 80/100 79/700 Minor Local Village T Left in Left out 3.5 L 17 80/500 80/275 Minor Local Village Y Left in Left out 3.5 R 18 81/300 80/725 Minor Local Village T Left in Left out 3.5 L Local Village- 19 81/700 81/215 Minor + Left in Left out 3 Cross Local Village 20 82/350 81/663 Minor Surajpura T Left in Left out 3.5 R 21 82/990 82/556 Minor Soniyana T Left in Left out 3.5 L 22 83/950 83/517 Minor Baglya T Left in Left out 3.5 L 23 84/450 83/866 Minor Local Village T Left in Left out 3 R 24 88/300 87/725 Minor Kukra T Left in Left out 3 L 25 91/450 89/625 Minor Kurga T Left in Left out 3 L Jassa Kheda- 26 96/300 94/153 Minor + Left in Left out 3.5 Cross Barakhand 27 100/040 97/617 Minor Local Village Y Left in Left out 3 L
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 8 – 28 102/650 100/058 Minor Togi Y Left in Left out 3 L 29 104/850 102/450 Minor Balacharat T Left in Left out 3 L 30 106/250 103/700 Minor Tribana Y Left in Left out 3.5 L 31 107/030 104/565 Minor Peladol T Left in Left out 3.5 L 32 108/400 105/675 Minor Local Village T Left in Left out 3 R 33 108/600 106/115 Minor Barakhand T Left in Left out 3.5 R 34 109/300 106/549 Minor Bhim Village Y Left in Left out 3.5 L 35 111/300 108.597 Minor Kundal T Left in Left out 3 R 36 113/950 111/260 Minor Kukar Kheda T Left in Left out 3.5 L 37 115/000 112/315 Minor Sadaran T Left in Left out 3.5 R 38 115/980 113/295 Minor Sunar kudi T Left in Left out 3.5 R 39 117/260 114/550 Minor Local Village T Left in Left out 3 L 40 117/470 114/670 Minor Devgarh T Left in Left out 3.5 L 41 119/350 116/700 Minor Village T Left in Left out 3.5 R 42 120/010 117/320 Minor Kushal Pur T Left in Left out 3.5 L 43 120/850 118/125 Minor Local Village T Left in Left out 3 R 44 122/050 119/325 Minor Atholiya T Left in Left out 3.5 L 45 122/260 119/530 Minor Tadgarh T Left in Left out 3.5 R 46 123/680 120/760 Minor Ota T Left in Left out 3.5 R 47 124/660 121/865 Minor Shakkar garh T Left in Left out 3.5 L 48 127/100 124/280 Minor Asane-Kahari + Left in Left out 3.5 Cross 49 128/500 125/550 Minor Thikarkhas T Left in Left out 3 L 50 129/960 126/940 Minor Miala Y Left in Left out 3.5 R 51 131/250 128/300 Minor Nabria T Left in Left out 3.5 R 52 133/050 130/160 Minor Raga guda T Left in Left out 3.5 R 53 134/450 131/510 Minor Juntra Y Left in Left out 3.5 L 54 136/850 133/720 Minor Baggar Y Left in Left out 3.5 L 55 137/700 134/765 Minor Pipli T Left in Left out 3.5 R 56 139/600 136/710 Minor Hempura T Left in Left out 3 L 57 140/220 137/210 Minor Temple T Left in Left out 3 L 58 141/200 138/180 Minor village T Left in Left out 3 L 59 141/980 138/975 Minor Motel Devgarh T Left in Left out 3 L Left in Left out 60 142/650 139/650 Minor Cheta T 3.5 R (Service Road) 61 146/790 143/710 Minor Motagura T Left in Left out 3.5 R
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 9 – 1.8.8 Service Road
The service road does not exist at present at any location. However eligible sections for provision of service road are proposed as presented below.
List of Proposed location for service Road
Sr. Name of Township Section (Chainage in km) No.
1. Beawar 58.245 59.000
2. Dewata 72.200 72.700
3. Pali Village 79.000 79.800
4. Surajpura 81.600 82.000
5. Jaskheda 94.000 94.800
6. Bhim 106.600 108.400
7. Barar 120.300 121.200
8. Kamblighat 140.700 142.900
1.8.9 Bus Bays
In order to improve the road user’s comfort, bus bays are proposed at various locations. The bus bays are proposed at important locations. The list of locations proposed for provision of bus bay is provided below:
Sr. Chainage Chainage Side Town Side No. (km) (km) 1. Left 66.700 Kalinagar Right 66.900 2. Left 96.500 Jassa Kheda Right 96.700 3. Left 101.400 Togi Right 101.600 4. Left 104.700 Balacharat Right 104.900 5. Left 116.400 Malya Thadi Right 116.600 6. Left 132.900 Sangawas Right 133.100 7. Left 145.100 Kaniyana Right 145.300
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 10 – 1.8.10 Truck Parking Lay byes
Truck lay byes are proposed at 2 locations in the project road section of 400m length. The locations are selected based on observations made during field surveys. The list of locations proposed for provision of truck parking laybye is as provided below:
Chainage (km/m) Side Location 143/000 Both Near Deogardh Junction 62/000 Both Near Sanwa Village
1.8.11 Wayside Amenity
In order to provide comfort to the road user, way side amenity has been proposed at km 113/500 near Bhim town. This amenity will be inclusive of space for parking, cafeteria, lodging and boarding for passenger, dormitory for truck/ vehicle drivers, recreation facilities etc.
In addition, measures have been proposed to improve traffic safety by proposing metal beam crash barrier, road signs, pavement marking and street lighting in urban areas.
1.8.12 Road Marking & Traffic Signs
Appropriate road markings are provided with stop signs, give-way signs, traffic merging and diverging signs, lane closure signs, compulsory keep left/right signs or any other signs as per IRC-67. Advance cautionary signs are proposed for sharp curves along with chevron signs at the outer edge of the curves. In hilly areas, curve- ahead signs are accompanied with appropriate delineators.
The signs will be of Super High Intensity grade micro-prismatic sheets of Type IX as per ASTM D 4956. Additional signs for toll rates etc are also provided near toll plaza as “Manual of Specifications and Standards for four laning of National Highways through Public Private Partnership”.
1.8.13 Overhead Signs
The overhead signs having width with respect to 2 lane road with paved shoulders are proposed at toll plazas only right now. The locations for overhead signs proposed are as tabulated below: Chainage Location 57.700 Near Beawar 66.000 Near Sanava village (Nr.toll plaza) 68.000 Near Sanava village(Nr.toll plaza) 135.000 Near Juntra village(Nr. Toll Plaza) 137.000 Near Juntra village(Nr. Toll Plaza)
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 11 – 1.8.14 Toll Plaza
Two Toll Plazas shall be provided as per the schedule C of concession agreement. Their location shall be at km 84.660 (proposed chainage 84.220) and km 136.430 (proposed chainage 133.500) respectively.
1.8.15 Minor Bridges
There are 37 numbers of existing Minor Bridges on the project road. All minor bridges having good condition and proposed for retention with minor repairs wherever required. One 4 lane additional minor bridge is to be constructed on Jawaja bypass.
1.8.16 Culverts
There are 247 numbers of existing culverts on the project road. Five (5) additional culverts are to be constructed on Jawaja bypass.
1.8.17 Details of Proposed Flyover, Underpass and ROB
Details of Flyover, Underpass and RoB on the corridor are as listed below.
Details of Flyover, Underpass and ROB
Sl. Proposed Span Type of Deck width Location No. Chainage configuration structure
Vehicular 1 107/958 1x11 21.11 m Bhim Village Underpass
2 107/340 2x20+1x40 2 x 10.25 m Bhim Village Flyover
3 141/715 2x20+1x40 2 x 10.25 m Kamlighat Flyover
1x34.774 4 139/401 (square) 1 x 12.0 m Kamlighat ROB 37.724 (skew)
Note:
i. Chainages referred to in this section are Design road chainages along the project road alignment. ii. Increase in spans due to change in skew angle of Proposed bridges, cross- drainage structures, flyovers, underpasses, overpasses or any other structure, shall be deemed to be included in the scope of the project.
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 12 – Other than the above two lane flyovers are proposed at start and end point of proposed Jawaja bypass, which are to be constructed as per Manual of Specification and Standards of four lane in accordance with IEC.
1.8.17 Details of Proposed Cattle/Pedestrian Underpass
The location and size of all proposed underpasses are tabulated below.
Details of Proposed Pedestrian / Non Vehicular Underpass along the Corridor
Sr. Chainage Opening Size (m) Type No. (Km)
1 79/250 4m x 2.5m Non Vehicular Underpass
2 96/600 4m x 2.5m Non Vehicular Underpass
1.8.18 Bypass
There is one proposed bypass on following location of the project road.
Jawaja Bypass deviates from NH-8 to the west at Ch. 74.800 and merges back to Ch. 77.500 of NH-8.
1.8.18 Development of Lined Drains
Lined drains are to be provided for urban and semi-urban sections where service road has been proposed.
1.9 Conclusions and Recommendations
The Beawar-Bhagana 4 laning project is a part of national highway development programme which joins two major cities, Delhi to Mumbai and Gujarat ports. The importance of up-grading the project to 4-laning is described below and shown in the map and project status table:
From Delhi to Kishangarh via Jaipur 6-lane NH-8 is nearing completion. Kishangarh to Beawar stretch via Ajmer, NH-8 is nearly in the completion stage for 6-laning. From Gomti to Udaipur NH-8 project is recently awarded for 4 laning. So the NH-8 portion between Beawar to Baghana with 2 lane and paved shoulders form a bottle- neck of traffic moving towards Gujarat and Mumbai. Also this section of national
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 13 – highway has 2-lane ghat portion of steep gradient near Udaipur. So the heavy traffic avoids this section and joins parallel NH-79 from Kishangarh towards Udaipur via Chittorgarh which is already 4 lane and awarded to concessionaire to up-grade to 6 lane road. Another parallel highway NH-14 of Beawar-Pali-Pindwara section also diverts some section of traffic as it is 4 lane and joins Beawar towards Ahmedabad.
Considering the above, it can be concluded that augmentation of Beawer-Baghana section will result in generation of socio economic benefits i.e. saving in fuel consumption, saving in travel time, reduction in accidents. This will provide boost to the rural and urban economy. Also as because the next section from Gomti to Udaipur is already awarded for up- gradation to 4 laning, the ghat portion will automatically in the verge for improvement. Project Status Table Stretch Name of NH Status A-B Jaipur - Kishangarh from Delhi (NH-8) 6 Lane Completed B-C Kishangarh-Ajmer-Beawar (NH-8) 6 Lane Nearly Completed 2 Lane with Paved C-D Beawar-Baghana-Gomti (NH-8) Shoulder D-E Gomti-Udaipur (NH-8) 4 lane Awarded Kishangarh-Chittorgarh-Udaipur B-E 6 lane Awarded (NH-79 & NH-76) C-F Beawar-Pali-Pindwara (NH-14) 4 lane in construction
Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 14 – KEYMAP Pre-Feasibility Report for 4 laning of NH 8 From Beawar to Baghana Km 58.245 to Km 147.000 Page 15 –
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--1122 ((EENNVVIIRROONNMMEENNTTAALL CCLLEEAARRAANNCCEE)) Annexure-XII
F.No. 10-42/2012-IA-III Government of India Ministry of Environment & Forests (IA-III Division) Paryavaran Bhawan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110 003
Dated: 21st March, 2013 To Regional Officer & Project Director, DCM, Ajmer Road, Jaipur – 302 019, Rajasthan
Subject: Environment Clearance for 4-laning of Beawar - Baghana section from km. 58.245 to Km 147.000 on NH-8 in the State of Rajasthan by Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, D.C.M Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan – Reg.
This has reference to your letter No. RW/JAI/RJ/2012/3767 dated 06.11.2012 seeking Environmental Clearance under the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006. The proposal has been appraised as per prescribed procedure in the light of provisions under the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 on the basis of the mandatory documents enclosed with the application viz., the Form-I, EIA, EMP, Public Hearing proceedings and the additional clarifications furnished in response to the observations of the Expert Appraisal Committee constituted by the competent authority in its meeting held 20th - 21st December, 2012.
2. It is interalia, noted that the proposal involves 4-laning of Beawar - Baghana section from km. 58.245 to Km 147.000 on NH-8 in the State of Rajasthan by MoRTH, DCM, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. The proposed section starts from km 58.245 near Beawar and ends at Km 147.000 near Baghana covering length of about 88.755 kilometers. The project road falls in Ajmer and Rajsamand districts of Rajasthan. Land use pattern of the project area is mainly agriculture and protected forest. The existing carriageway is 2- lane flexible pavement of 7m width 1.5 m paved shoulder and 1.0 m earthen shoulder at both sides and proposed is 4-lane divided with 7.25 m carriageway with 0.6 m median and 1.0 m line drain. Existing ROW varies from 23m to 60m. The proposed RoW is 60 m. Total land requirement for the project will be 330 ha. 62 ha of protected forest land need to diverted, as the existing alignment passes through road side plantation declared as protected forest. The project road does not pass through any eco-sensitive areas. There is no wild life sanctuary or National Park on the project highway. Approximately 10494 trees proposed to be felled for the 4-laning of the project road against which compensatory afforestation shall be of 31500 trees. There are 35 nos. minor bridges and 248 nos. of slab/box culvert exist on the project road. 1 No. of minor bridge 4 No. of slab culverts, 01 No. of RoB, 04 Nos. of flyover, 02 Nos. of PUP and 01 No. of VUP is proposed for construction. There are 06 major and 61 minor junctions exist on the project road. 03 major and 61minor (Out of remaining 3 major junctions, 2 provided with Flyover & 1 with VUP) junctions are proposed. The intersections along the project road section are proposed to improve in accordance with IRC codes. The important intersections are proposed to be provided with islands and verges at centre for proper movement of diverging/ merging traffic. One bypass at Taragarh from Chg 85.700 to Chg 86.700 exists on the project road. There is one proposed bypass at Jawaja, which deviates from NH-8 to the west at Ch. 74.800 and merges back to Ch. 77.500 of NH-8. The length of bypass is 3.0 km. Bus bays & shelters have been proposed at seven locations (both side). One truck lay- bye (Km 144, both sides) exist on the project road. 02 Nos. of truck lay-bye (Km 143 and Km 62, both sides) have been proposed. The average water requirement for the project is 300 KLD. The water requirement will be met through bore-well after taking the necessary permission from the authorities. However, as per Central Ground Water Authority, the project area does not fall under notified critical/ overexploited areas. The average daily traffic on project road based on traffic count at two traffic count stations is 3561 PCU. There is an Existing Two lane RoB at km 142. 418 and another 2 lane RoB is proposed adjacent to it. The Project road has total 67 junctions including major and minor junctions with all types of crossings. Major intersections are Pali junction at km 58/400, km 64/850 and km 109/800, km 110/000, km 110/350, km 142/150 at Kamli Ghat. The total civil cost of the project is Rs. 700 crores.
3. The proposal was examined by the EAC in its 113th meeting held on 4th – 5th June, 2012 and finalized the TOR for further study including conduct of Public Hearing. Public Hearing conducted on 10.10.2012 at Baghana, Rajsamand District and on 18.10.2012 at Beawar, District Ajmer.
4. The Expert Appraisal Committee, after due consideration of the relevant documents submitted by the project proponent and additional clarifications furnished in response to its observations, have recommended for the grant of Environmental Clearance for the project. Accordingly, the Ministry hereby accords necessary Environmental Clearance for the above project as per the provisions of Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and its subsequent amendments, subject to strict compliance of the terms and conditions as follows:
5. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
(i) The project involves diversion of 62 ha of protected forest land for which the proponent shall obtain the requisite FC. The proponent can execute the above project on the entire stretch located in non- forest land, provided that the proponent submits an undertaking while making application to get FC that the execution of work on non- forest land shall not be cited as a reason for grant of FC and in case FC is declined, width of the portion of road falling in the forest land will be maintained at its existing level.
(ii) It is indicated that approximately10494 trees proposed to be felled for the 4-laning of the project road against which compensatory afforestation shall be of 31500 trees. Necessary permission from competent authority shall be obtained for tree cutting. Necessary green belt shall be provided on both side of the highway with proper central verge and cost provision should be made for regular maintenance.
(iii) Fly ash shall be utilized in the project.
(iv) Explore the possibilities of using cold mix technology wherever possible particularly near wildlife sanctuary.
(v) Necessary permission shall be obtained from Competent Authority for drawal of Ground water for the project. The guidelines/criteria for ground water abstraction issued by Central Ground Water Authority shall be followed.
(vi) The natural drainage flow from the catchment area to the water bodies shall not be prevented. To ensure, proper drainage arrangement shall be provided as committed.
(vii) Rain water harvesting including oil and grease trap shall be provided. Water harvesting structures shall be located at every 500 mts along the road. Vertical drain type rainwater harvesting structures shall be set up to minimize surface runoff losses of rainwater.
(viii) R&R shall be as per the guidelines of State/Central Government.
(ix) IRC guidelines shall be followed for widening & up-gradation of road.
(x) The responses/commitments made during public hearing shall be complied with letter and spirit.
(xi) All the recommendation of the EMP shall be complied with letter and spirit. All the mitigation measures submitted in the EIA report shall be prepared in a matrix format and the compliance for each mitigation plan shall be submitted to MoEF along with half yearly compliance report to MoEF-RO.
(xii) Green belt development shall be undertaken as suggested in EMP.
(xiii) The seismic nature of the area shall be taken into account while designing the project.
(xiv) The project proponent shall obtain necessary permission from the State Irrigation Department before drawing water from the river sources for the purpose of the proposed construction activity.
(xv) Sidewalk shall be provided along the bridges.
(xvi) The drain shall be at least 1 m. away from the toe of the embankment of the road adopting IRC guidelines.
(xvii) Longitudinal drains shall be provided all along the project road to ensure proper drainage of the area. In addition, adequate number of under passes and culverts to act as cross drainage structures shall also be provided.
(xviii) The solid waste generated shall be used for rehabilitating the borrow areas.
(xix) For providing safety to the crossing animals and avoid road accidents speed breakers/rumbled strips shall be constructed at the identified locations of the animal movements. Enough hoardings and signages shall also be put up for the public and vehicles convenience.
(xx) Minimum of three times the number of trees to be cut shall be planted. It shall be ensured that the trees planted as a part of the afforestation shall be looked after by PWD, Bikaner. Tree plantation shall be of the same species/local species and survival shall be monitored. Transplantation of trees shall be carried out wherever possible. The tree plantation shall be taken up on the extreme end of the road.
(xxi) Necessary clearance from the State Government shall be obtained for extraction of sand from the rivers.
(xxii) Proper signage shall be installed at appropriate locations for the convenience of the traffic movement.
(xxiii) The embankments/slopes and the slopes left after cutting shall be provided with vegetative turning to avoid soil erosion.
(xxiv) The hot mix plant shall be located at least 500 mts. Away from habitation and on the barren land to avoid its adverse impact on the human population.
(xxv) Rehabilitation and payment of compensation to the project affected people (PAPs) shall be made as per the policy of the State Government.
(xxvi) Noise barriers shall be provided at appropriate locations particularly in the areas where the alignment passes through inhabited areas so as to ensure that the noise levels do not exceed the prescribed standards.
(xxvii) For road safety, IRC guidelines in respect of road signages, service roads, bus bays, inter-sections, pedestrians crossings, etc. shall be strictly adhered to.
6. GENERAL CONDITIONS:
(i) Adequate provision for infrastructure facilities including water supply, fuel and sanitation must be ensured for construction workers during the construction phase of the project to avoid any damage to the environment.
(ii) Appropriate measures must be taken while undertaking digging activities to avoid any likely degradation of water quality.
(iii) Borrow sites for each quarry sites for road construction material and dump sites must be identified keeping in view the following:
(a) No excavation or dumping on private property is carried out without written consent of the owner.
(b) No excavation or dumping shall be allowed on wetlands, forest areas or other ecologically valuable or sensitive locations.
(c) Excavation work shall be done in close consultation with the Soil Conservation and Watershed Development Agencies working in the area, and
(d) Construction spoils including bituminous material and other hazardous materials must not be allowed to contaminate water courses and the dump sites for such materials must be secured so that they shall not leach into the ground water.
(iv) The construction material shall be obtained only from approved quarries. In case new quarries are to be opened, specific approvals from the competent authority shall be obtained in this regard.
(v) Adequate precautions shall be taken during transportation of the construction material so that it does not affect the environment adversely.
(vi) Borrow pits and other scars created during the road construction shall be properly levelled and treated.
(vii) Adequate financial provision must be made in the project to implement the aforesaid safeguards.
(viii) The project proponent will set up separate environmental management cell for effective implementation of the stipulated environmental safeguards under the supervision of a Senior Executive.
(ix) Full support shall be extended to the officers of this Ministry/ Regional Office by the project proponent during inspection of the project for monitoring purposes by furnishing full details and action plan including action taken reports in respect of mitigation measures and other environmental protection activities.
(x) A six-Monthly monitoring report shall need to be submitted by the project proponents to the Regional Office of this Ministry regarding the implementation of the stipulated conditions.
(xi) Ministry of Environment & Forests or any other competent authority may stipulate any additional conditions or modify the existing ones, if necessary in the interest of environment and the same shall be complied with.
(xii) The Ministry reserves the right to revoke this clearance if any of the conditions stipulated are not complied with the satisfaction of the Ministry.
(xiii) In the event of a change in project profile or change in the implementation agency, a fresh reference shall be made to the Ministry of Environment and Forests.
(xiv) The project proponents shall inform the Regional Office as well as the Ministry, the date of financial closure and final approval of the project by the concerned authorities and the date of start of land development work.
(xv) A copy of the clearance letter shall be marked to concerned Panchayat/local NGO, if any, from whom any suggestion/ representation has been made received while processing the proposal.
(xvi) Safety provision such as bus bays, service roads intersection improvement etc., will be carried out by the project proponent. The project proponent shall provide adequate facilities as per IRC norms/guidelines.
(xvii) State Pollution Control Board shall display a copy of the clearance letter at the Regional Office, District Industries Center and Collector’s Office/Tehsildar’s office for 30 days.
7. These stipulations would be enforced among others under the provisions of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Public Liability (Insurance) Act, 1991 and EIA Notification 2006, including the amendments and rules made thereafter.
8. All other statutory clearances such as the approvals for storage of diesel from Chief Controller of Explosives, Fire Department, Civil Aviation Department, Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 etc. shall be obtained, as applicable by project proponents from the respective competent authorities.
9. The project proponent shall advertise in at least two local Newspapers widely circulated in the region, one of which shall be in the vernacular language informing that the project has been accorded Environmental Clearance and copies of clearance letters are available with the State Pollution Control Board and may also be seen on the website of the Ministry of Environment and Forests at http://www.envfor.nic.in. The advertisement should be made within 10 days from the date of receipt of the Clearance letter and a copy of the same should be forwarded to the Regional Office of this Ministry.
10. Any appeal against this clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under Section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
11. This Clearance is subject to final order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Goa Foundation Vs. Union of India in Writ Petition (Civil) No.460 of 2004 as may be applicable to this project.
12. Status of compliance to the various stipulated environmental conditions and environmental safeguards will be uploaded by the project proponent in its website.
13. The project proponent shall also submit six monthly reports on the status of compliance of the stipulated EC conditions including results of monitored data (both in hard copies as well as by e-mail) to the respective Regional Office of MoEF, the respective Zonal Office of CPCB and the SPCB.
14. The environmental statement for each financial year ending 31st March in Form-V as is mandated to be submitted by the project proponent to the concerned State Pollution Control Board as prescribed under the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, as amended subsequently, shall also be put on the website of the company along with the status of compliance of EC conditions and shall also be sent to the respective Regional Offices of MoEF by e-mail.
(Lalit Kapur) Director (IA-III) Copy to: 1. The Secretary, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Chairman, Central Pollution Control Board, Parivesh Bhawan, CBD- cum-Office Complex, East Arjun Nagar, Delhi – 110 032. 3. The Member Secretary, Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board, 4, Institutional Area, Jhalana Dugri, Jaipur. 4. The CCF, Regional Office, Ministry of Environment & Forests , RO(CZ), Kendriya Bhawan, 5th Floor, Sector ‘H’, Aliganj, Lucknow – 226 020. 5. IA - Division, Monitoring Cell, MOEF, New Delhi - 110003. 6. Guard file.
(Lalit Kapur) Director (IA-III)
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--1133 ((VVIILLLLAAGGEE MMAAPP WWIITTHHIINN AAJJMMEERR DDIISSTTRRIICCTT IINN WWHHIICCHH PPEERRMMIISSSSIIOONN FFOORR TTRREEEE CCUUTTTTIINNGG IISS SSOOUUGGHHTT )) Annexure-XIIIAnnexure-XIVA
REVENUE MAP OF DADOLA VILLAGE (ALONG NH-8 CHAINAGE KM.87.050 TO KM.88.250)
KM.87.050
KM.88.250
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--1144 ((SSTTAATTUUSS OOFF NNHH--88 IINN RRAAJJAASSTTHHAANN ))
Annexure - XIV
DETAILS OF STRETCHES OF NATIONAL HIGHWAY 8 (NH - 8)
The National Highway 8 (NH-8) enters in Rajasthan State from Shajapur near Baharar at km. 110.000 at Boardin– with Haryana. The details of National Highway 8 within Rajasthan are as below: –
1. State Border with Haryana to Jaipur :With NHAI 2. Jaipur to Kishangarh : Developed by NHAI 3. Kishangarh to Bewar : Under implementation with NHAI 4. Beawar to Gomti Choraha : With MoRT&H 5. Gomti Choraha to Udaipur : Under implementation with NHAI for 4 laning 6. Udaipur to State Border with Gujarat : Developed with NHAI
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--1155 ((FFOORREESSTT CCLLEEAARRAANNCCEE)) Annexure-XV
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--1166 ((FFOORREESSTT CCLLEEAARRAANNCCEE)) Annexure-XVI
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--1177 ((AAFFFFIIDDAAVVIITT)) Annexure-XVII
AANNNNEEXXUURREE--1188 ((GGEEOO--RREEFFEERREENNCCEEDD BBOOUUNNDDAARRYY OONN TTOOPPOOSSHHEEEETT)) 74°0'30"E 74°6'0"E 74°11'30"E Annexure - XVIII
Kabra ![ ![
![
Kishanpura ![ ![ Bhambipura 25°57'30"N 25°57'30"N Roopana Chiliyabar ![ ![ Kalat Khera ![
Jaliya -II Baslala Jawaja ![ ![
Jaliya-II Bas Roopa Badiya Bhau ![ ![ Jaliya II Bas Peetha ![
Jaliya II Bas Durga ![ Surajpura ![ Rawatmala ![ Lotiyana Lasani ![ ![
Naya Khera ![ Shero Ka Baala ![ Project Start Point Km 87.050
Dadola ![ 25°52'0"N 25°52'0"N
Project End Point Km 88.250
Bali ![
Jalpa Palri ![ ![
Samapa ![
Bala Charat ![ Legend Togi ![
25°46'30"N Existing Road (NH-8) 25°46'30"N Area of Proposed RoW Been ![ Declared as PF Dadola Protected Forest Scale - 1:50000 Nandawat Toposheet No - 45 K/1 ![ 74°0'30"E 74°6'0"E 74°11'30"E