Ticf Kkddv KERALA GAZETTE B[Nimcniambn {]Kn≤S∏Spøp∂Xv PUBLISHED by AUTHORITY

2014 \hw-_¿ 4 Xncph\¥]pcw, hmeyw 3 4th November 2014 \º¿ sNm∆ 1190 Xpemw 18 18th Thulam 1190 43 Vol. III } Thiruvananthapuram, No. } 1936 Im¿ØnIw 13 Tuesday 13th Karthika 1936

PART I Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Skills Department the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour and Skills (A) Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months. ORDERS ANNEXURE (1) Whether the termination of Services of Sri Vincent Raj, delivery boy of Fathima Gas G. O. (Rt.) No. 1332/2014/LBR. Service, Kovalam by its management is Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. justifiable? If not what are the reliefs he is entitled to ? Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Proprietor, Fathima (2) Gas Service (Hindustan Petrolium), Fathima Building, G. O. (Rt.) No. 1333/2014/LBR. Vizhinjam Road, Kovalam Junction, Thiruvananthapuram- Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. 695 527 and the workman of the above referred establishment Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Sri Vincent Raj, M. J., Rajsadan, K. S. Road, Kovalam industrial dispute exists between (1) The Managing represented by Sri N. Sivakumar, Secretary, Director, Muthoot Fin. Corp., Muthoot Centre, Punnan Thiruvananthapuram District Cooking Gas Workers Union, Road, Thiruvananthapuram, (2) Sri Santhosh Kumar Kaithamukku, Thiruvananthapuram-695 024 in respect of (Managing Director), Global Detective and Security matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; Services, Opposite Army Officers Enclove, Pangod, Thirumala P. O., Thiruvananthapuram, (3) the Branch And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Manager, Muthoot Fin. Corp., Ambalappuzha, Alappuzha necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; District and the workman of the above referred Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by establishment Sri G. Radhakrishnan, Mulakkapparambil, Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Punnapra P. O., Alappuzha in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that 4th NOV. 2014] KERALA GAZETTE 156

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The Industrial to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months. months. ANNEXURE ANNEXURE Whether the denial of employment to Whether the denial of employment of Sri Benni, V. J., Sri G. Radhakrishnan, Security Staff in Global Security Staff in Raven Air Security Agency, Detective and Security Services, Opposite Army Avalookunnu P. O., Alappuzha by its Officers Enclove, Pangod, Thirumala P. O., management is justifiable? If not what relief Thiruvananthapuram by its management is he is entitled to ? justifiable? If not what relief he is entitled to ? (5) (3) G. O. (Rt.) No. 1336/2014/LBR. G. O. (Rt.) No. 1334/2014/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. Whereas, the Government are of opinion that Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an an industrial dispute exists between the Managing industrial dispute exists between Sri S. Gauthaman, Director, IAL India Limited, 6th Floor, Metroplaza, Director, QRS Retail Limited, Box No. 162, M. G. Road, Market Road, Kochi-682 014 and the workman of the Trivandrum-695 001 and the workman of the above above referred establishment Sri Lee Gopinathan, K., referred establishment Sri Jobin, C. K., Kuzhivila Veedu, Muthenvila Veedu, Palayamkunnu P. O., Varkala, Nallila P. O., Kollam-691 515 in respect of matters Pin-695 146 in respect of matters mentioned in mentioned in the annexure to this order; the annexure to this order; And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; adjudication; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will the award within a period of three months. pass the award within a period of three months. ANNEXURE ANNEXURE Whether the dismissal of Sri Jobin, C. K., Salesman, Sony World Exclusive Showroom, Whether the dismissal of Sri Lee Gopinathan, K. Kollam a branch of QRS Retail Limited vide by the management of IAL India Limited is office order dated 3-9-2013 by the management justifiable ? If not, what reliefs he is entitled to ? is justifiable or not? If not what relief he is (6) entitled to get ? (4) G. O. (Rt.) No. 1337/2014/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. G. O. (Rt.) No. 1335/2014/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Retired Colonel St. Antony’s Public School, Kizhakkambalam P. O.-683 562 Ramakrishnan Nair Ravi, Raven Air Security Agency, and the workman of the above referred establishment Ayilet, AMCV/3, Kottamkulangara Ward, Avalookunnu Sri M. R. Jose, Muttamthottil Veedu, Thuruthukara, P. O., Alappuzha-688 006 and the workman of the above Kizhakkambalam P. O. in respect of matters mentioned referred establishment Sri Benni, V. J., s/o George, P. V., in the annexure to this order; Bennison Villa, Chadanappally P. O., Pathanamthitta-689 And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is 648 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for this order; adjudication; 8 4th NOV. 2014] KERALA GAZETTE 157

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct adjudication; that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 pass the award within a period of three months. (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication ANNEXURE to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months. Whether the denial of employment to Sri M. R. Jose by the management of St. Antony’s Public ANNEXURE School, Kizhakkambalam P. O.-683 562 is Whether the denial of employment to justifiable or not ? If not, what are the reliefs Sri P. N. Sadasivan, Puthenpurayil, Vallicode P. O., he is entitled to ? Kaippattoor and Smt. Retnamma, Niliyath Veedu, (7) Iymali, Omalloor P. O., by Sri C. C. John (Chairman), St. Johns College, Priyadarshini Hills, Prakkanam G. O. (Rt.) No. 1338/2014/LBR. is justifiable or not ? If not what are the reliefs Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. the workers are entitled to ? (9) Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Unit Head, G. O. (Rt.) No. 1340/2014/LBR. Traco Cable Company, Irimpanam, Thirupunithura, Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. Ernakulam-682 309 and the workmen of the above Whereas, the Government are of opinion that referred establishment represented by the General an industrial dispute exists between the Proprietor, Secretary, Traco Cable Company Employees Union, Manna Cashew Company, Premier Building, Anjili Road, Irimpanam, Thirupunithura-682 309 in respect of Shankers Hospital Junction, Kollam-691 001 and the matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; workmen of the above referred establishment represented by Sri V. Sathyaseelan, State President, Kerala Kasu-Andi And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Thozhilali Congress, Rajeev Bhavan, INTUC Office, necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Ezhukone P. O., Kollam in respect of matters mentioned adjudication; in the annexure to this order; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct adjudication; that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 pass the award within a period of three months. (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication ANNEXURE to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass Whether the claim of the Traco Cable Company the award within a period of three months. Employee’s Union, Irimpanam, Thirupunithura ANNEXURE to amend the date of birth of its member T. K. Kishore, in view of the G.O.(P) No. 45/91/ Whether the dismissal of Smt. Parisha, Peeling Worker (Card No. 193) from the Service of P&ARD dated, 30-12-1991 is maintainable or not ? Manna Cashew Company, Kannanalloor If maintainable what are the reliefs he is entitled to? Branch w.e.f. 30-5-2014 by the management (8) is justifiable ? If not what are the reliefs the worker is entitled to ? G. O. (Rt.) No. 1339/2014/LBR. (10) Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. G. O. (Rt.) No. 1341/2014/LBR. Whereas, the Government are of opinion that Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. an industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri C. C. John Whereas, the Government are of opinion that (Chairman), St. Johns College, Priyadarshini an industrial dispute exists between the General Manager, Hills, Prakkanam P. O., Pathanamthitta-689 643 Torry Harris Seafoods Private Limited, Eramalloor P. O., (2) Sri Mercy Cheriyan (Secretary), St. Johns College, Alappuzha and the workmen of the above referred Priyadarshini Hills, Prakkanam P. O., Pathanamthitta- establishment represented by the General Secretary, 689 643 and the workmen of the above referred Kerala Malsya Samskarana Thozhilali Union (KMSTU) establishment (1) Sri P. N. Sadasivan, Puthenpurayil, H. O. The Centre, Ambalapuzha in respect of matters Vallicode P. O., Kaippattoor-689 659 (2) Smt. Retnamma, mentioned in the annexure to this order; w/o Raghunathan Nair, Niliyath Veedu, Iymali, And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Omalloor P. O.-689 647 in respect of matters mentioned necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for in the annexure to this order; adjudication;

9 4th NOV. 2014] KERALA GAZETTE 158

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by ANNEXURE Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Whether the denial of employment to Sri. Sreekumar, (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Sreenilayam, Aikkad, Kodumon P. O., that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Pathanamthitta by Smt. Suseela Rajendranath, to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass Registered Owner of M.K.K. Bus, Bus the award within a period of three months. No. KL-26-5310 is justifiable or not ? If not what ANNEXURE are the reliefs the workman is entitled to ? Whether the denial of various privileges and benefits (13) to the employees designated as Supervisors in G. O. (Rt.) No. 1344/2014/LBR. Torry Harris Seafoods Private Limited, Eramalloor, Cherthala on the contention that they are Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. not coming within the ambit of ‘workmen’ is Whereas, the Government are of opinion that justifiable or not ? If not what are the benefits an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, they are entitled to ? Wallardi Estate, Vandiperiyar P. O., Idukki District and (11) the worker of the above referred establishment Smt. Anna Mary (CR No. 2625), Wallardi Estate, G. O. (Rt.) No. 1342/2014/LBR. Diemukku P. O., Vandiperiyar, Idukki District, Pin-685 533 Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Administrative And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Officer, Somervell Memorial C.S.I. Medical College and necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; Hospital, Karakonam, Thiruvananthapuram and the worker of the above referred establishment Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Smt. Saroja Russel, Russel Saroja Daire, Anavoor P. O., Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Alathoor, Neyyattinkara in respect of matters mentioned (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct in the annexure to this order; that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for three months. adjudication; ANNEXURE Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Whether the dismissal of Smt. Anna Mary Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (CR No. 2625) Worker of Wallardi Estate, (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Vandiperiyar is justifiable or not ? If not, what that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication relief she is entitled to? to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months. By order of the Governor, ANNEXURE RAJANIKANT R. BALIGA, Under Secretary to Government. Whether the termination of services Smt. Saroja Russel, Nursing Assistant/Attender of Dr. S.M.C.S.I. Medical College, Karakonam by its management is justifiable ? If not what are the reliefs she is entitled to? (12) G. O. (Rt.) No. 1343/2014/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2014. Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Smt. Suseela Rajendranath, Chakkanattu House, Parakode P. O., Adoor-691 554 and the workman of the above referred Bus Owner Sri. Sreekumar, Sreenilayam, Aikkad, Kodumon P. O., Pathanamthitta-691 555 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months. 10