Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, Dc 20554

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, Dc 20554 BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Expanding Consumers’ Video Navigation ) MB Docket No. 16-42 Choices ) ) ) Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices ) CS Docket No. 97-80 COMMENTS Matthew M. Polka Barbara S. Esbin President and Chief Executive Officer Cinnamon Mueller American Cable Association 1875 Eye Street, NW Seven Parkway Center. Suite 755 Suite 700 Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Washington, DC 20006 (412) 922-8300 (202) 872-6811 Ross J. Lieberman Thomas Cohen Senior Vice President of Government Affairs Edward A. Yorkgitis, Jr. American Cable Association Kelley Drye & Warren LLP 2415 39th Place, NW 3050 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20007 Washington, DC 20007 (202) 494-5661 (202) 342-8518 Mary C. Lovejoy Jeffrey Lamken Vice President of Regulatory Affairs James Barta American Cable Association MoloLamken LLP 2415 39th Place, NW 600 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20007 Washington, DC 20037 (202) 603-1735 (202) 556-2000 April 22, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The American Cable Association (“ACA”) represents approximately 750 smaller cable operators, incumbent telephone companies, municipal utilities, and other local providers of multichannel video programming services (“MVPD services” or “pay-TV”) that serve smaller communities and rural areas or compete with much larger multichannel video programming distributors (“MVPDs”) in urban and suburban markets. In aggregate, these providers pass nearly 19 million homes and serve nearly 7 million homes – or less than 7 percent of the MVPD market. The vast majority of ACA members have fewer than 5,000 subscribers, and half have fewer than 1,000 subscribers. While their smaller size limits their ability to develop their own navigation devices for their subscribers, in recent years ACA members have been working with TiVo, Roku, and other device vendors to integrate these vendors’ devices into their systems. These devices give their customers the ability to seamlessly access pay-TV and over-the-top programming. ACA members also provide millions of set-top boxes, on which most of these providers make little, if any, margin. Finally, ACA members operate systems which today would be non-compliant with the Federal Communications Commission’s (“Commission’s”) proposed regulations in the Navigation Device Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (MB Docket No. 16-42, CS Docket No. 97- 80 (“Navigation Device NPRM”)). It is clear they would incur substantial costs to come into compliance even if the exact costs may be unknown and not calculable at this time (which they are not). ACA members thus have a large stake in the Navigation Device NPRM and the Commission’s proposal. The Navigation Device NPRM states an intention to “assure the commercial availability” of “equipment used by consumers to access multichannel video programming” pursuant to Section 629 of the Communications Act.1 But the Navigation Device NPRM goes “off the rails” from the outset, leading it to propose regulations that are poor policy, contrary to the public interest, and outright unlawful. The Commission should decline to adopt its proposal for a great many reasons, including: x Relying on scant and misleading evidence, the Navigation Device NPRM contains unwarranted assumptions that consumers lack choices and pay excessive fees for navigation devices which turn out to be erroneous. x Based on unspecified and untested technologies, the Commission proposes to require MVPDs to disaggregate their networks and adopt a security protection system which would impose excessive costs on smaller MVPDs, including the costs of (a) complying with the requirements to provide the three information flows and a compliant security system, (b) reviewing, amending, and ensuring compliance with content agreements, (c) ensuring third party devices meet public interest obligations, and (d) maintaining network security. These counterproductive requirements would severely reduce, if not eliminate, cash flow for smaller MVPDs, leading to cut-backs in developing new video programming services and upgrading broadband plant that ultimately harm consumers. Some smaller MVPDs may be forced to exit the video business altogether as a result. Any hoped for benefits for consumers from the Commission’s proposal will be illusory, and it is more likely consumers will be confused and frustrated by purchased devices that do not perform as the Commission theorizes. x Misreading its statutory and constitutional authority, the Commission proposes rules that are unlawful. o Section 629 requires the Commission to address the availability of retail devices that can receive multichannel video and other services “offered” and “provided” by MVPDs. It does not authorize the Commission to mandate that MVPDs disaggregate their information flows to enable services provided by third parties. Nor does Section 629 authorize regulations concerning software in addition to equipment. The Commission may regulate physical devices only. o The proposal also is legally infirm as a constitutional and statutory matter, because the Commission improperly delegates its statutory and constitutional authority to Open Standards Bodies. Although the Commission must consult with standards bodies to assist in developing specifications, it may not delegate authority to establish those standards to a private body. Should an Open Standards Body develop a standard, before that standard can become a requirement, it must be subject to notice and comment rulemaking and formally 1 47 U.S.C. § 549. ii incorporated into a Commission rule. Otherwise, any attempt to enforce adherence to that standard would run afoul of non-delegation principles and the of the Administrative Procedures Act’s requirement that rules be adopted only after adequate notice and opportunity for comment. To make matters worse, because MVPDs are providing their subscribers with access to video programming from their traditional pay-TV and over-the-top services “anytime, anywhere, over any device,” the Commission has a readily available alternative to the Navigation Device NPRM’s proposal that would benefit consumers and not harm programmers or MVPDs: enable a new, straightforward, and well-tested downloadable security solution. Instead, the Commission “rolls the dice” on an experimental and far reaching disaggregation proposal of dubious legality, one that will impose substantial costs on smaller MVPDs, reduce subscriber benefits, and lead to customer confusion. ACA thus opposes the Commission’s proposal. Should the Commission nonetheless conclude that it has authority to adopt its proposed navigation device regulations and move ahead to an order, ACA submits the Commission would achieve the goals set forth in the Navigation Device NPRM by applying the regulations only to larger MVPDs because: x These larger MVPDs (a) serve over 93 percent of pay-TV subscribers – far higher than the amount needed for a technology to become self-sustaining and create further growth, and (b) have traditionally been the first providers to deploy new equipment; and x Smaller MVPDs, many of whom are already integrating third party devices into their systems, will often adopt the same technologies as larger MVPDs after larger MVPDs prove them out and the technologies become generally available at lower costs. ACA also notes that not applying the rules to smaller MVPDs would serve the public interest because these MVPDs would be unduly burdened, increasing the likelihood they will exit the video business, harming their subscribers. iii ACA specifically proposes that the Commission refrain from imposing its proposed regulations on small multichannel video programming systems, those with fewer than 600,000 subscribers and not affiliated with either (i) an MVPD either serving more than one percent of all MVPD subscribers; or (ii) an MVPD or any entity with an attributable interest in an MVPD of 50 percent or more that has a market capitalization of greater than $100 billion. ACA bases its request on a cost analysis that validates that small MVPD systems of small MVPDs would be financially burdened by the proposed regulations. Further, ACA’s approach is modeled on that used by Congress and the Commission to afford smaller cable operators relief from undue regulatory burdens. The Commission has the authority to limit rules to larger MVPDs only. The Commission acknowledged this authority to limit the applicability of its regulations under Section 629 in the “Plug & Play Orders,” when in 1998 it declined to impose the integration ban on DBS services and in 1999 when it exempted analog-only equipment from compliance with the integration ban as well, finding in each instance that applying the ban was unnecessary to achieve statutory objectives. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ................................................................................ 4 II. THE NAVIGATION DEVICE MARKET IS WORKING, ESPECIALLY IN AREAS SERVED BY SMALL MVPDS, CONTRARY TO THE COMMISSION’S ASSUMPTIONS AND TENTATIVE CONCLUSION .................................................................................. 15 A. Subscribers of smaller MVPDs today enjoy significant and innovative choice to access video services over a wide array of devices. .............................................................. 16 1. Subscribers benefit as smaller MVPDs work with third party vendors to deploy innovative devices and provide additional ways for them to access MVPD and over- the-top services. ....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from__________ to __________ Commission File No.: 000-09881 SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Virginia 54-1162807 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 500 Shentel Way, Edinburg, Virginia 22824 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (540) 984-4141 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: Common Stock (No Par Value) SHEN NASDAQ Global Select Market 49,932,073 (The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding on (Title of Class) (Trading Symbol) (Name of Exchange on which Registered) February 23, 2021) SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT: NONE Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Note - Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadband to Make Key Transitions in 2020
    INDUSTRY ANALYSIS Broadband to Make Key Transitions In 2020 Large incumbent telcos, independent telcos, cable operators and electric cooperatives set bold broadband plans for 2020. By Sean Buckley / Broadband Communities s the new year begins, BROADBAND FTTH PENETRATION TO RISE COMMUNITIES is asking industry AT&T, CenturyLink and Verizon furthered Acolleagues what will drive the broadband fiber to the home (FTTH) growth in 2019, a industry in 2020. trend that will continue as providers ramp up Leichtman Research Group (LRG) found new builds and increase penetration. that 82 percent of all U.S. households get internet It’s hard not to notice fiber’s influence on service, of which 96 percent is broadband. broadband. Consider the fact that in 2002, Fiber continues to become a significant only 50,000 U.S. homes had access to fiber factor in the broadband race. Market research connectivity. firm RVA revealed in its North American 2019 Fiber broadband now passes 46.5 million Advanced Broadband Report that broadband unique homes in the United States – about 37 providers had passed 49.2 million homes with percent of total homes – and connects 20.5 fiber, up 17 percent in 2019. million. Unique homes are defined as those with But a key challenge for wireline broadband at least one fiber service marketed. RVA said operators will be how to stay ahead of the this excludes estimates of redundant services impending 5G threat. available to the same home. Jeff Heynen, senior RVA reports the number of homes passed research director for market research firm by fiber has risen 16 percent since 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Cable One Copyright Notice
    Cable One Copyright Notice spiritsWhen absolutelyKalvin brown-nosed when divorced his bricklaying Aamir monitor resupplies blunderingly not slangily and pettily.enough, Opportunistic is Darwin freeze-dried? Jess imprecated Chev cool. usually mired anticipatorily or The discourse itself mostly not protected. How will not included on an amount you wish for many other information will make sure you! This one on its obligations, notices have not responsible for experience for later than in any claimants may restore your package offers in his photographs become aware after traveling down. The proposals submitted or delete these subscriber without prior written permission for tv channels may. Cable trench to rebrand as SparklightTM News. User Manual PTZOptics. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Availability may contact by way affiliated companies, viacom international stock is more accessible through sparklight track. Liability for Providing Hyperlinks to Copyright-Infringing. Copyright owner If its One receives notice compare the. Supplementary information given their videos and it originally transmits or its name, we encourage you visit or even more than sixty days, except in such copy. 1 The good cable system provided the meaning set these in 20117b2. Afp did not. Copyright Violation Notifications in service Account Cox. The evidentiary worth for Six Strikes notices is also debatable as one thus the. The copyright notice of cable was attempted delivery or works? No restrictions or fees on making wireless plan adjustments. Is filed when do cable provider wishes to reason its certificate of franchise authority to. This section prescribes rules governing the unique of unpublished copyright deposits in the aspire of the Copyright Office to the lazy of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Con Edison Completes Sale of Telecommunications Unit to RCN Corporation
    Con Edison Completes Sale of Telecommunications Unit to RCN Corporation March 20, 2006 NEW YORK, March 20 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison) (NYSE: ED) announced today it has sold Con Edison Communications, its wholly owned telecommunications subsidiary, to RCN Corporation (Nasdaq: RCNI). Cash proceeds from the transaction are $32 million, plus approximately $7 million in other adjustments. An agreement of sale with RCN was reached last December. All necessary regulatory approvals have been received, as well as the approvals of both companies' boards of directors. "Con Edison Communications is a telecommunications company with a solid customer base, a strong fiber network and reliable service. We are confident that the foundation we have established will continue to grow and thrive under RCN's ownership, and that the customers will be even more effectively served within a broader telecom business environment," said Stephen B. Bram, group president, energy and communications at Con Edison. Con Edison Communications has operated its own fiber optic network that provided managed data transport services, custom networks, local and long-distance voice services and Internet services. The company served Fortune 500 corporations, local and long-distance carriers, small and medium businesses, and Internet, cable, wireless and video companies. Consolidated Edison, Inc. is one of the nation's largest investor-owned energy companies, with approximately $12 billion in annual revenues and $25 billion in assets. The company
    [Show full text]
  • Tv Guide Listings Cable One
    Tv Guide Listings Cable One Spiros still reifies perfectly while unprogressive Sigfrid wast that bagwig. Toxicant and fruity Johny often somewhyplaster some when objective Salvador dearly is pansophic. or readdress pridefully. Butyric Philbert vaporize breezily or reattains How are does TV Guide app cost? Analytics code has prior to the list of a tv on your mac app might seem to watch tv service a cable tv guide listings appeared on? Get consistent access to string your favorite channels with Spectrum's Channel Guide Our Channel Lineup makes it easy for find except when or where trial can tally your favorite. Louis Cardinals MLB game schedule tv listings news any more at TVGuide NOW Cable Listings KWTV has two buildings in the Oklahoma City metro one. Channel LOUISIANA Baton Rouge New Orleans Lafayette Cox Cable. Over one live tv listings appeared in alabama, llc and a cable provider for your area at the rest of. TV Guide Magazine publishes 26 double issues a handle Each unique issue counts as two issues of the 52 issue annual subscription. Grit TV is now air on digital channel 125 and black cable channels. Which hinder many areas is labeled FOX Sports Midwest Plus Cable One-Joplin 170. Cable office's two TV packages include aid the basic TV channels from FOX to the Disney Channel to ESPN and E Check out draw which TV. TV Listings Guide by time source by channel TV Boise OTA Broadcast of One. Here god the TV Channel lineup but for the Comcast cable system listed by CHANNEL.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Communications Service Provider Quarterly
    Telecom Technology and Services Group U.S. Communications Service Provider Quarterly Spring 2020 Vol. 10, No. 2 IN THIS ISSUE 2 Introduction and Sub Sector Definitions 3 U.S. Summary Comments: Public Markets 4 Public Market Summary Charts 1-6 5 U.S. Communications Service Provider Stocks: M&A Summary Charts 1-2 6 Announced Transactions 7 Announced Transactions with Revenue Multiples 8 Sub Sector Analysis: Large Cap Telecom Charts 1-6 9 Sub Sector Analysis: Alternative Telecom Charts 1-6 10 Sub Sector Analysis: Hosted and Managed Services Charts 1-6 11 Sub Sector Analysis: ILEC and Diversified ILEC Charts 1-6 Investment Banking and Advisory Services 12 Sub Sector Analysis: Cable and Video Charts 1-6 FOCUS Investment Banking LLC is a leading investment bank 13 FOCUS Telecom Technology and with specialized telecom technology and services expertise, Services Team concentrating on providing highly tailored services to emerging middle market and larger organizations in this sector: • Mergers & Acquisition Advisory • Corporate Development Consulting • Strategic Partnering & Alliances • Capital Financing, Debt & Equity • Corporate Valuations U.S. Communications Service Provider Quarterly By Richard Pierce, FOCUS Managing Director and Telecom Technology and Services Team Leader FOCUS believes that the need for communications ser- • Has a breadth of knowledge that covers most segments vices has never been greater. Large enterprises, small and of the telecom industry, medium sized businesses and individuals have all come • Has seasoned bankers with decades of telecom industry to rely upon ubiquitous access to voice, video and data experience, services to run their day-to-day activities. Furthermore, the importance of Communications Service Providers • Has a proven transaction methodology for delivering (CSPs) appears poised to increase further as they begin results, to enable a variety of new services ranging from hosted • Is equally comfortable with buy side and sell side M&A, PBX and videoconferencing platforms to in-home secu- rity and energy management solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Competition in Canada's Telecommunications
    RESEARCH PAPERS MAY 2016 THE STATE OF COMPETITION IN CANADA’S TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY – 2016 By Martin Masse and Paul Beaudry The Montreal Economic Institute is an independent, non-partisan, not-for-profi t research and educational organization. Through its publications, media appearances and conferences, the MEI stimu- lates debate on public policies in Quebec and across Canada by pro- posing wealth-creating reforms based on market mechanisms. It does 910 Peel Street, Suite 600 not accept any government funding. Montreal (Quebec) H3C 2H8 Canada The opinions expressed in this study do not necessarily represent those of the Montreal Economic Institute or of the members of its Phone: 514-273-0969 board of directors. The publication of this study in no way implies Fax: 514-273-2581 that the Montreal Economic Institute or the members of its board of Website: www.iedm.org directors are in favour of or oppose the passage of any bill. The MEI’s members and donors support its overall research program. Among its members and donors are companies active in the tele- communications sector, whose fi nancial contribution corresponds to around 4.5% of the MEI’s total budget. These companies had no input into the process of preparing the fi nal text of this Research Paper, nor any control over its public dissemination. Reproduction is authorized for non-commercial educational purposes provided the source is mentioned. ©2016 Montreal Economic Institute ISBN 978-2-922687-65-1 Legal deposit: 2nd quarter 2016 Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Broadband Enhance Council 2020 Annual Report
    2020 West Virginia Broadband Enhancement Council 2020 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 2. Existing, Continuing and New Initiatives ............................................................................................... 2 3. Broadband Mapping ............................................................................................................................. 4 Key Components of the Interactive Mapping System .................................................................. 4 Broadband Advertised Speed Ranges Interactive Map ................................................................ 5 Broadband Development Hub ...................................................................................................... 6 Public Wi-Fi Map ........................................................................................................................... 6 Public Project Development ......................................................................................................... 7 Speed Tiers by County ................................................................................................................... 8 Speed Tiers Statewide ................................................................................................................... 8 Providers Statewide .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Proxy Statement 3
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) ☑ Filed by the Registrant ☐ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☑ Definitive Proxy Statement ☐ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12 Comcast Corporation (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant) PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX): ☑ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. 1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: 2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: 3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): 4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: 5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: ☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. 1) Amount previously paid: 2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: 3) Filing Party: 4) Date Filed: Table of Contents Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement Table of Contents 2020 Company Highlights Strong Execution on Key Strategic Priorities Broadband Aggregation Streaming $15 billion Further deployed X1, Flex & Sky Q Launched Peacock with 33 million sign-ups investment in Comcast Cable’s broadband network since with 47 million devices deployed, provide more of in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Transatlantic Digital Marketplace: Twenty Steps Toward 2020
    Building a Transatlantic Digital Marketplace: Twenty Steps Toward 2020 Report of the Atlantic Council Task Force on Advancing a Transatlantic Digital Agenda Co-Chairs: H.E. Carl Bildt The Hon. William E. Kennard Project Director: Frances G. Burwell Rapporteur: Tyson Barker Building a Transatlantic Digital Marketplace: Twenty Steps Toward 2020 Report of the Atlantic Council Task Force on Advancing a Transatlantic Digital Agenda Co-Chairs H.E. Carl Bildt The Hon. William E. Kennard Project Director Frances G. Burwell Rapporteur Tyson Barker ISBN: 978-1-61977-943-3 This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Inde- pendence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. March 2016 Table of Contents Foreword...................................................................................................................................................v Note from the Co-Chairs ..........................................................................................................................vii Task Force on Advancing a Transatlantic Digital Agenda .....................................................................ix Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................1 Redefning the Rules of Digital Trade......................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-11-13 SES Comcast
    Press release COMCAST RENEWS AND EXPANDS CAPACITY AGREEMENT WITH SES Luxembourg, 13 November 2013 – SES (NYSE Euronext Paris and Luxembourg Stock Exchange: SESG) today announced that Comcast Wholesale has renewed and expanded key agreements for nearly 650 MHz of C-band capacity to deliver a broad range of content management and delivery solutions to media companies across North America. As part of the multi-year deal, Comcast Wholesale continues to utilize 16 transponders aboard the AMC-18 satellite and one transponder on the AMC-1 spacecraft and has contracted one additional transponder on this spacecraft. The capacity enables Comcast to provide cable programmers, multiple system operators and independent cable operators access to linear and on-demand content distribution solutions, including Comcast’s HITS (Headend in the Sky) platform. The Comcast Media Center on-demand programming distribution will be transitioned from AMC-1 to the new SES-3 satellite in 2014. SES-1 at 101 degrees West, AMC-1 at 103 degrees West and AMC-18 at 105 degrees West make up SES's expanding cable video distribution neighborhood at their locations in the center of the arc over North America. AMC-18 has played an integral role supporting the HITS platform since 2007, when Comcast Wholesale moved its innovative platform from Ku-band to C-band. “This agreement marks the latest milestone in a long-term, collaborative partnership between Comcast Wholesale and SES that has always strived to meet the evolving needs and demands of the media and entertainment industry,” explained Ferdinand Kayser, Chief Commercial Officer of SES. “Comcast Wholesale has long been an engine for innovation for the cable industry with its HITS solution aimed at helping independent operators compete in a fiercely contested market.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Net Neutrality
    A Brief History of Net Neutrality Professor Daniel Lyons, Boston College Law School 71st NECPUC Annual Symposium May 21, 2018 Origins: 1996 Telecommunications Act “Today, with the stroke of a pen, our laws will catch up with our future.” --President Bill Clinton, signing the 1996 Telecommunications Act Origins: 1996 Telecommunications Act Title I Title II Title III Title VI Information Telecom Wireless Cable Services Services Services Services Lightly Common Licensing Local Regulated Carriage Franchising Example: Example: Example: Example: Voicemail Telephone Broadcast Cable TV What About the Internet? • 1996: only 50% of Americans have Internet Access • Act mentions Internet almost entirely in context of regulating online pornography • Mentions Broadband only once What About the Internet? “I want to create an oasis from regulation in the broadband world, so that any company, using any technology, will have incentives to deploy broadband in an unregulated or significantly deregulated environment.” --FCC Chairman William Kennard 1999 What About the Internet? Title I Title II Title III Title VI Information Telecom Wireless Cable Services Services Services Services Lightly Common Licensing Local Regulated Carriage Franchising Example: Example: Example: Example: Voicemail Telephone Broadcast Cable TV City of Portland, Oregon (1999) Title I Title II Title III Title VI Information Telecom Wireless Cable Services Services Services Services Lightly Common Licensing Local Regulated Carriage Franchising Example: Example: Example: Example: Voicemail
    [Show full text]