DOCSLIB.ORG

Reynolds Opportunity Fund

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reynolds Opportunity Fund REYNOLDS FUNDS Dear Fellow Shareholders: November 3, 1999 We app re c i a te your continued confidence in the Reynolds Funds and would like to welcome our many new share- holders. The Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund was ranked #1 among Growth and Income Funds by Lipper Inc. for the five years ended September 30, 1999. The Web Site for the Reynolds Funds is www.reynoldsfunds.com. We are pleased to introduce a new investment option, the Reynolds Fund. This Fund is No-Load and is now available for investment. I am the portfolio manager of this Fund in addition to continuing to manage the four other No-Load Reynolds Funds. The Reynolds Fund is a general stock fund and is intended to be a core i nvestment holding. The Fund may own common stocks of all types and sizes and will mainly invest in common stocks of U. S. headquart e red companies. While the Fund will ge n e ra l ly invest in “grow t h companies”, it may also invest in “value stocks”. The Reynolds Blue Chip Growth and Op p o r tunity Funds had strong app re c i a tion for the twelve months ended September 30, 1999: October 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999 +48.6% +60.0% Reynolds Reynolds Blue Chip Opportunity Growth Fund Fund The Blue Chip and Opportunity Funds also The Blue Chip and Opportunity Funds also had strong appreciation for the three years ended had strong ap p re c i ation for the five ye a rs ended September 30, 1999: September 30, 1999: Average Annual Total Returns Average Annual Total Returns October 1, 1996 through September 30, 1999 October 1, 1994 through September 30, 1999 +35.5% +30.8% +31.8% +28.2% Reynolds Reynolds Reynolds Reynolds Blue Chip Opportunity Blue Chip Opportunity Growth Fund Fund Growth Fund Fund – 1 – The Blue Chip Fund has received many awards for its recent performance including: (1) America Online – Featured on Sage Online - September 8, 1999. (2) American Association of Individual Investor’s Magazine – featured in the May, 1999 issue. (3) CNBC – Featured on October 22, 1999. (4) Investor’s Business Daily – The Blue Chip Fund has received an A+ ranking from Investor’s Business Daily. Investor’s Business Daily ranks mutual funds on the basis of a moving 36-month performance. The top 5% of all mutual funds receive an A+ ranking. Investor’s Business Daily considered 4,929 mutual funds for the three years ended September 30, 1999 in determining this ranking. (5) Lipper Inc. – #1 ranking out of 347 Growth & Income funds for the five years ended September 30, 1999, ranked #2 out of 537 funds for the three years ended September 30, 1999 and ranked #2 out of 150 funds for the ten years ended September 30, 1999, and ranked #5 out of 859 funds for the one year ended September 30, 1999. (6) Mutual Funds Magazine – Chosen as the #1 growth mutual fund for 2000 in the December, 1999 edition. (7) Standard & Poor’s The Outlook – Recommended in the July 28, 1999 issue. The Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund The Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund has investments in many of the premier larger worldwide growth companies. These companies have proven management, strong financials including low debt and high return on equity, leading re s e a rch and development, and dominant wo rl dwide products with good unit growth. In addition, many of these companies are not significantly affected by economic fluctuations. The probabilities highly favor that the diversified group of industry leading companies held in the Blue Chip Fund will remain industry leaders over the long-term, continue to strongly increase their earnings, and continue to significantly increase future shareholder wealth. The Blue Chip Fund’s return was +13.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 1999. The Blue Chip F u n d ’s re t u rn was +48.6% for the one-year ended September 30, 1999, +148.9% for the three ye a rs ended September 30, 1999 and +297.8% for the five years ended September 30, 1999. These were average annual compounded rates of return of +35.5% and +31.8%, respectively. The Blue Chip Fund’s return was +407.5% for the ten years ended September 30, 1999. This was an average annual compounded rate of return of +17.6%. The Blue Chip Fund increased +512.3% since inception (August 12, 1988) through September 30, 1999. This was an average annual compounded rate of return of +17.7%. The Board of Directors declared a distribution of $0.00526 from net long-term realized gains on October 27, 1999. This distribution was paid on October 28, 1999 to shareholders of record on October 26, 1999. The Reynolds Opportunity Fund The Reynolds Opportunity Fund generally invests in medium and large size high quality companies that have proven themselves in the marketplace and are leaders in their industries. These well-managed companies usually have sales of more than $500 million and are demonstrating strong earnings growth from proprietary innovative products. A long-term investment in the Reynolds Opportunity Fund should be a good complement to a long-term i nvestment in the new Reynolds Fund and the Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund. We are making a high probability bet with the companies in the Opportunity Fund, just as we are with the companies in the Blue Chip F u n d, that the majority of the companies within a well dive rs i fied group of proven wo rl dwide leading companies will continue to be leaders and strongly increase their earnings and shareholder wealth in the future. – 2 – The Reynolds Opportunity Fund increased +20.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 1999 and +60.0% for the one-year year ended September 30, 1999. The Opportunity Fund increased +123.8% for the three years ended September 30, 1999 and increased +246.9% for the five years ended September 30, 1999. These were average annual compounded rates of return of +30.8% and 28.2%, respectively. The Opportunity Fund increased +250.1% since inception (January 30, 1992) through September 30, 1999. This was an average annual compounded rate of return of +17.8%. The Board of Directors declared a distribution of $0.01118 from net long-term realized gains and $0.09367 from net short-term realized gains on October 27, 1999. These distributions were paid on October 28, 1999 to shareholders of record on October 26, 1999. The Reynolds U.S. Government Bond Fund The Reynolds U.S. Government Bond Fund emphasizes high quality investments in U.S. Treasury Bonds, Treasury Notes and Treasury Bills of varying maturities. As of September 30, 1999, the assets were invested approximately 91% in U.S. Treasury Securities and 9% in high quality cash equivalents. The Reynolds U.S. Government Bond Fund is designed to satisfy many of the fixed income objectives of i nve s t o rs. For ex a m p l e, the Bond Fund is active ly managed and is invested in bonds of many diffe re n t maturities, which reduces the risk that a large percentage of the bonds in the Fund mature at an inopportune time for reinvestment. The Bond Fund had a dollar weighted average maturity of 1.6 years on September 30, 1999. The average maturity of the bonds in the Fund is continually reevaluated and adjusted based on short and long-term economic, inflation and interest rate forecasts. The Reynolds U. S. Gove rnment Bond Fund’s re t u rn was +3.2% for the one-year ended September 30, 1999. The Bond Fund’s return was +15.7% for the three years ended September 30, 1999 and +31.1% for the five years ended September 30, 1999. These were average annual compounded rates of return of +5.0% and +5.6%, re s p e c t ive ly. The Bond Fund’s re t u rn was +44.6% since inception (Ja nu a ry 30, 1992) thro u g h September 30, 1999. This was an average annual compounded rate of return of +4.9%. The Reynolds Money Market Fund The Reynolds Money Market Fund is designed to provide for inve s t o r ’s short - t e rm cash manage m e n t needs. For ease of redemption, the Money Market Fund offers: (1) free check writing (in amounts of $500 or more); or (2) telephone redemption where either a check is mailed to the shareholder, or money may be wired to the share h o l d e r ’s bank account ($12.00 wiring ch a rge). As of September 30, 1999, the assets of the Reynolds Money Market Fund were invested approximately 78% in high quality commercial paper and 22% in high quality cash equivalents. As of September 30, 1999, the dollar weighted average days to maturity of the Money Market Fund was 65 days. The Reynolds Money Market Fund’s yield should vary with the rate of inflation over the years. Its yield is u s u a l ly higher than infl ation and higher than or ap p rox i m at e ly the same as most bro ke rage - fi rm sponsore d money market funds. Brokerage-firm sponsored money market funds typically have higher expense structures due to their higher marketing costs. The Reynolds Money Market Fund’s yield is almost always higher than rates paid by most short-term bank accounts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amazon.Com E-Tail Customer Fulfillment Networks Pioneer
    Customer Fulfillment in the Digital Economy Amazon.com E-tail Customer Fulfillment Networks Pioneer “The logistics of distribution Scorecard are the iceberg below the 1 waterline of online bookselling.” B-web type • Aggregation (e-tail) /Agora —Jeff Bezos, (auctions, Zshops) hybrid model founder and CEO, Amazon.com KEY PARTICIPANTS “Ten years from now, no one Customers • Consumers and business buyers will remember whether Context providers • Amazon.com and online Amazon.com spent an extra merchants (Amazon.com $100,000 upgrading shipping associates, Zshops, auctions) from the West Coast to the East Content providers • Amazon.com and small online merchants (Amazon.com Coast. All that will matter is associates, Zshops, auctions) whether electronic commerce • Suppliers and b-web partners gave people a good or bad (publishers; producers [OEM]; distributors e.g. Ingram Micro, experience.”2 Baker & Taylor Books, and others) —David Risher, senior vice president for Commerce services • Amazon.com and merchants merchandising, Amazon.com participating in auctions and Zshops “This [the Amazon.com • Third party shippers (UPS & USPS) distribution warehouses and Infrastructure providers • Amazon.com Drop shippers such as Ingram CFN] is the fastest expansion of • • Technology providers such as distribution capacity in Oracle, Net Perceptions, and i2 peacetime history.”3 Technologies Third party shippers (UPS, USPS) —Jeff Bezos, • founder and CEO, Amazon.com Offering • The largest online e-tailer of books, music, videos, toys, and gifts • Recently expanded service offering to include auctions (March 1999) and Zshops (September 1999)—an aggregation of merchants on its Web site • Aspires to become a one-stop shop for merchandise on the Web CFN value proposition • “Earth’s largest selection” of merchandise at competitive prices, 360 Adelaide Street W, 4th Floor a validated product assortment, Toronto, Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • NASDAQ MLNK 2003.Pdf
    Dear Fellow Stockholder: Our fiscal year 2003 has seen the completion of an eighteen-month period of restructuring, and the focus of management’s efforts on expansion of select core businesses. CMGI has made great strides in building its long- term liquidity and improving its operating results. The focus of management’s attention continues to be on building the global supply chain management business and expanding the literature fulfillment business in the United States, both of which are operated by CMGI’s wholly owned subsidiary, SalesLink, and realizing value and liquidity from the venture capital portfolio of our venture capital affiliate, @Ventures. The restructuring of CMGI into a more focused operating company was achieved in several steps during the year: • Non-core or under performing businesses were divested. This included CMGI’s divestitures of its interests in Engage, Inc., NaviSite, Inc., Equilibrium Technologies, Inc., Signatures SNI, Inc., Tallan, Inc. and Yesmail, Inc. • uBid, Inc. sold its assets to a global leader in sourcing, selling and financing of consumer goods. • AltaVista Company, operating in the rapidly consolidating internet search industry, sold its assets to Overture Services, Inc., which was acquired by Yahoo! Inc. shortly thereafter. The divestiture of these businesses has allowed CMGI to focus its management resources on its global supply chain management and fulfillment businesses. CMGI ended fiscal year 2003 with $276 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. Cash used for operating activities from continuing operations in fiscal 2003 improved markedly from fiscal 2002. The cash balances available at year end permit CMGI to strive toward accomplishing three objectives: maintaining a liquidity reserve to protect the long-term future of the company, investing in expansion of its supply chain management and fulfillment businesses, and making selective acquisitions, either of new accounts or of companies, to expand these businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Distribution, E-Commerce and Other Computer Related Issues
    Internet Distribution, E-Commerce and Other Computer Related Issues: Current Developments in Liability On-Line, Business Methods Patents and Software Distribution, Licensing and Copyright Protection Questions Table of Contents Contents I. Liability On-Line: Copyright and Tort Risks of Providing Content, or Who’s In Charge Here? ......................................................................................................1 A. The Applicability of Multiple Laws ..........................................................................1 B. Jurisdictional Questions ..........................................................................................2 C. Determining Applicable Law .................................................................................16 D. Copyright Infringement ..........................................................................................21 E. Defamation & the Communications Decency Act ..................................................31 F. Trademark Infringement ........................................................................................36 G. Regulation of Spam ................................................................................................47 H. Spyware ..................................................................................................................54 I. Trespass .................................................................................................................55 J. Privacy ...................................................................................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Case Study
    Last updated: August 2002 Amazon.com Case Update Amazon.com Inc. (stock: AMZN) is undoubtedly the poster child for Internet retail businesses. It is the No. 1 Internet retailer of books, music, DVDs and videos, and has 26 million active customers in more than 220 countries as of first quarter 2002. In 2001, Interbrand's annual World's Most Valuable Brands survey ranked Amazon.com as the 76th most valuable brand in the world, ahead of Burger King and Shell, among others. According to MMXI Europe Audience Ratings Report, the Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.de and parent Amazon.com site are the top three online retail sites in Europe, based on reach. Amazon's founder and chairman, Jeff Bezos, was Time magazine's "Man of the Year" in 1999. Amazon.com has evolved from an online bookseller to a general merchant, and today is the largest online retailer. It claims that it has “the Earth’s biggest selection” of products in categories such as books, music, DVDs, videos, toys, electronics, software, video games, lawn and patio, kitchen and home improvement. The company has also created Web-based marketplaces, including Amazon Marketplace, Amazon.com Auctions and zShops, where businesses or individuals can sell virtually anything. The Amazon.com family of websites also includes Internet Movie Database (www.imdb.com), a comprehensive source of information on more than 300,000 movies and entertainment programs and 1 million cast and crew members dating from 1892 to the present. Amazon Anywhere (www.amazon.com/anywhere) marks the company's entrance into mobile e-commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Oc-Gl-Etv-Og-V02-091223
    OpenCable™ Guidelines Enhanced TV Operational Guidelines OC-GL-ETV-OG-V02-091223 RELEASED Notice This document is the result of a cooperative effort undertaken at the direction of Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. for the benefit of the cable industry and its customers. This document may contain references to other documents not owned or controlled by CableLabs. Use and understanding of this document may require access to such other documents. Designing, manufacturing, distributing, using, selling, or servicing products, or providing services, based on this document may require intellectual property licenses from third parties for technology referenced in the document. Neither CableLabs nor any member company is responsible to any party for any liability of any nature whatsoever resulting from or arising out of use or reliance upon this document, or any document referenced herein. This document is furnished on an "AS IS" basis and neither CableLabs nor its members provides any representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for a particular purpose of this document, or any document referenced herein. © Copyright 2006 - 2009 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. OC-GL-ETV-OG-V02-091223 OpenCable™ Guidelines Document Status Sheet Document Control Number: OC-GL-ETV-OG-V02-091223 Document Title: Enhanced TV Operational Guidelines Revision History: V01 - released 7/14/06 V02 - released 12/23/09 Date: December 23, 2009 Status: Work in Draft Released Closed Progress Distribution Restrictions: Author Only CL/Member CL/ Member/ Public Vendor Trademarks CableLabs®, DOCSIS®, EuroDOCSIS™, eDOCSIS™, M-CMTS™, PacketCable™, EuroPacketCable™, PCMM™, CableHome®, CableOffice™, OpenCable™, OCAP™, CableCARD™, M-Card™, DCAS™, tru2way™, and CablePC™ are trademarks of Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 13-0399 JBM Journal Special Issue Vol 19.Indd
    Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld 59 Steve Jobs’ Immortal Quest and the Heroic Persona Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld Yale University October 2011 was a month of historic milestones for Apple. At the end of the prior month, on Tuesday, September 27, Apple sent media invitations for a press event to be held October 4, 2011 at 10:00 am at the Cupertino Headquarters for a major announcement. Several prominent industry analysts proclaimed with hopeful optimism that the firm would announce the return of Apple founder Steve Jobs. Sadly, Steve Jobs did not appear for what turned out to be a product announcement of the iPhone 4S. In fact, Jobs had stepped down as CEO on January 17, 2011, a year and a half after returning from medical leave. He stated that Tim Cook, Apple’s Chief Operating Officer, would run day-to-day operations as he had previously done during Jobs’ 2009 medical leave. The analysts’ wishful thinking had some basis in more than cult like denial of Steve Jobs’ mortality. In fact, despite that medical leave, Jobs had returned for the iPad 2 launch on March 2 and the iCloud introduction on June 6. The analysts were among many constituents around the world who were to be tragically disappointed. Jobs actually had resigned as CEO on August 22, 2011 saying, “I have always said if there ever came a day when I could no longer meet my duties and expectations as Apple’s CEO, I would be the first to let you know. Unfortunately, that day has come” (Isaacson, 2011). Six weeks later, a day after the new iPhone press conference, he died (Isaacson, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • 2. the Advertising-Supported Internet 21 2.1 Internet Advertising Segments 2.2 the Value of the Advertising-Supported Internet 3
    Economic Value of the Advertising- Supported Internet Ecosystem June 10, 2009 Authored by Hamilton Consultants, Inc. With Dr. John Deighton, Harvard Business School, and Dr. John Quelch, Harvard Business School HAMILTON CONSULTANTS Cambridge, Massachusetts Executive Summary 1. Background 8 1.1 Purpose of the study 1.2 The Internet today 1.3 Structure of the Internet 2. The Advertising-Supported Internet 21 2.1 Internet advertising segments 2.2 The value of the advertising-supported Internet 3. Internet Companies and Employment by Internet Segment 26 3.1 Overview of Internet companies 3.2 Summary of employment 3.3 Internet service providers (ISPs) and transport 3.4 Hardware providers 3.5 Information technology consulting and solutions companies 3.6 Software companies 3.7 Web hosting and content management companies 3.8 Search engines/portals 3.9 Content sites: news, entertainment, research, information services. 3.10 Software as a service (SaaS) 3.11 Advertising agencies and ad support services 3.12 Ad networks 3.13 E-mail marketing and support 3.14 Enterprise-based Internet marketing, advertising and web design 3.15 E-commerce: e-tailing, e-brokerage, e-travel, and others 3.16 B2B e-commerce 4. Companies and Employment by Geography 50 4.1 Company headquarters and total employees by geography 4.2 Census data for Internet employees by geography 4.3 Additional company location data by geography 5. Benefits of the Ad-Supported Internet Ecosystem 54 5.1 Overview of types of benefits 5.2 Providing universal access to unlimited information 5.3 Creating employment 5.4 Providing one of the pillars of economic strength during the 2008-2009 recession 5.5 Fostering further innovation 5.6 Increasing economic productivity 5.7 Making a significant contribution to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NASD Notice to Members 99-46
    Executive Summary $250, and two or more Market NASD Effective July 1, 1999, the maximum Ma k e r s . Small Order Execution SystemSM (S O E S SM ) order sizes for 336 Nasdaq In accordance with Rule 4710, Nas- Notice to National Market® (NNM) securities daq periodically reviews the maxi- will be revised in accordance with mum SOES order size applicable to National Association of Securities each NNM security to determine if Members Dealers, Inc. (NASD®) Rule 4710(g). the trading characteristics of the issue have changed so as to warrant For more information, please contact an adjustment. Such a review was 99-46 ® Na s d a q Market Operations at conducted using data as of March (203) 378-0284. 31, 1999, pursuant to the aforemen- Maximum SOES Order tioned standards. The maximum Sizes Set To Change SOES order-size changes called for Description by this review are being implemented July 1, 1999 Under Rule 4710, the maximum with three exceptions. SOES order size for an NNM security is 1,000, 500, or 200 shares, • First, issues were not permitted to depending on the trading characteris- move more than one size level. For Suggested Routing tics of the security. The Nasdaq example, if an issue was previously ® Senior Management Workstation II (NWII) indicates the categorized in the 1,000-share maximum SOES order size for each level, it would not be permitted to Ad v e r t i s i n g NNM security. The indicator “NM10,” move to the 200-share level, even if Continuing Education “NM5,” or “NM2” displayed in NWII the formula calculated that such a corresponds to a maximum SOES move was warranted.
    [Show full text]
  • PFSWEB Annual Report 2021
    PFSWEB Annual Report 2021 Form 10-K (NASDAQ:PFSW) Published: April 30th, 2021 PDF generated by stocklight.com UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 _________________________________________ Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) _________________________________________ ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 000-28275 _________________________________________ PFSWEB, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) _________________________________________ Delaware 75-2837058 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification Number) 505 Millennium Drive, Allen, Texas 75013 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code 972-881-2900 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $.001 par value PFSW Nasdaq Capital Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None _________________________________________ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Y es ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • An Antitrust Analysis of Google's Proposed Acquisition of Doubleclick
    JOINT CENTER AEI-BROOKINGS JOINT CENTER FOR REGULATORY STUDIES An Antitrust Analysis of Google’s Proposed Acquisition of DoubleClick Robert W. Hahn and Hal J. Singer Related Publication 07-24 September 2007 An Antitrust Analysis of Google’s Proposed Acquisition of DoubleClick Robert W. Hahn† Hal J. Singer†† By serving as a key revenue source for online content providers, online advertising has been instrumental in the development of innovative websites. Continued innovation among content providers, however, depends critically on the competitive provision of online advertising. Suppliers of online advertising provide three primary inputs—(1) advertiser tools, (2) intermediation services, and (3) publisher tools. Certain suppliers such as Google provide a platform that combines the inputs into one integrated service. In this paper, we focus on the overlapping products sold to advertisers by Google and DoubleClick—namely, the supply of advertiser tools. Because the supply of advertiser tools is highly concentrated, Google’s proposed acquisition of DoubleClick raises important questions for antitrust authorities. Proponents of this acquisition argue that Google and DoubleClick do not compete—that is, buyers of search-based or contextual-based advertising (the two advertising channels in which Google participates) do not perceive graphic-based advertising (the advertising channel in which DoubleClick participates) to be substitutes. Thus, they conclude that the proposed acquisition would not lead to higher prices. In this paper, we examine economic evidence and legal precedent to help identify the relevant antitrust product market for Google’s proposed acquisition of DoubleClick. According to the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice Horizontal Merger Guidelines, product markets are defined by the response of buyers to relative changes in prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon.Com, Inc. Securities Litigation 01-CV-00358-Consolidated
    Case 2:01-cv-00358-RSL Document 30 Filed 10/05/01 Page 1 of 215 1 THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK 2 3 4 5 6 vi 7 øA1.S Al OUT 8 9 UNITE STAThS15iSTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 10 AT SEATTLE 11 MAXiNE MARCUS, et al., On Behalf of Master File No. C-01-0358-L Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, CLASS ACTION 12 Plaintiffs, CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT FOR 13 VS. VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES 14 EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AMAZON COM, INC., JEFFREY P. BEZOS, 15 WARREN C. JENSON, JOSEPH GALLI, JR., THOMAS A. ALBERG, L. JOHN DOERR, 16 MARK J BRITTO, JOEL R. SPIEGEL, SCOTT D. COOK, JOY D. COVEY, 17 'RICHARD L. DALZELL, JOHN D. RISHER, KAVITARK R. SHRIRAM, PATRICIA Q. 18 STONESIFER, JIMMY WRIGHT, ICELYN J. BRANNON, MARY E. ENGSTROM, 19 KLEJNER PERKINS CAUF1ELD & BYERS, MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER, 20 CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON, MARY MEEKER, JAMIE KIGGEN and USE BUYER, 21 Defendants. 22 In re AMAZON.COM, INC. SECURITIES 23 LITIGATION 24 This Document Relates To: 25 ALL ACTIONS 26 11111111 II 1111111111 11111 III III liii 1111111111111 111111 Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Le955 600 West Broadway, Suite 18 0 111111 11111 11111 liii III III 11111 11111111 San Diego, CA 92191 CV 01-00358 #00000030 TeIephone 619/231-058 Fax: 619/2j.23 Case 2:01-cv-00358-RSL Document 30 Filed 10/05/01 Page 2 of 215 TA L TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 4 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW I 5 JURISDICTION AND VENUE .............................36 6 THE PARTIES ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics Resource Center (2013) a Scary Headline
    If I Were Trying to Get and Keep an Ethical Culture . Prof. Marianne Jennings Emeritus W.P.Carey School of Business Arizona State University Jennings Where we are SOME SCARY SLIDES 2 Ethical Lapses . Davis-Besse . Google (3 times) . Bear Stearns . Adelphia (FENOC) . GroupOn . Berkshire Hathaway . Deloitte Touche . ADM . Hallmark Westland . Biovail . Delphi . AIG (three times) . HealthSouth . BNY . Deutsche Bank . Allergan . Body Shop . Diamond Nuts . Helig-Myers . American Apparel . Boeing . Downey Savings & . Herbalife . American Express . BP (three times) Loan . HP . Apple (twice) . Bristol-Myers . Duke Energy Squibb . HSCB . Apollo Group . DuPont . Calpers . ImClone . Arthur Andersen . Edward Jones . Cardinal Health . IndyMac . AstraZeneca . Eli Lilly . Cendant . Ernst & Young . Johnson & Johnson . AT & T . Chase . Facebook . Autonomy . Kmart . Chesapeake Energy . Fannie Mae (twice) . Avon . KPMG (twice) . Chiquita . Fidelity Investments . Bally Total Fitness . Chrysler . Krispy Kreme . Galleon Hedge Fund . Bank of America . Cintas . Lehman Brothers . General Electric . Barclays . Citigroup . Lennar Corp. GlaxoSmithKline (2) . Bayer . Columbia HCA . Lucent . BCBS . Computer . Global Crossing Associates . Madoff Investment . BCCI . Global Research Securities . Countrywide . BDO Seidman Financial . GM . Marsh & McLennan . CSFB . Goldman Sachs (2X) . McNeil (Tylenol) . CVS Ethical Lapses . Medtronic . Qwest . Mellon Bank . Razorfish . Tyco International . Mercer . RBS . UBS . Merck . Reebok . UnitedHealth Group . Refco . Merrill Lynch . Universities and . MF Global . Royal Ahold sports . Royal Shell . Microstrategy . UPS . Milberg Weiss . SAC Capital . Wachovia . Moody’s . Saks Fifth Avenue . Morgan Stanley . Sallie Mae . WaMu . Navistar International . Samsung . Wells Fargo . New Century Financial . Satyam (India) . World Bank . Shaw Group . New Orleans Saints . WorldCom . Nortel . Siemens . Xerox . Novartis . Société General . Options scandals (200 . Standard & Poor’s . Zynga companies) . Stanford Investments . Oracle . Student loan lenders .
    [Show full text]