DOCSLIB.ORG

Amazon.Com E-Tail Customer Fulfillment Networks Pioneer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amazon.Com E-Tail Customer Fulfillment Networks Pioneer Customer Fulfillment in the Digital Economy Amazon.com E-tail Customer Fulfillment Networks Pioneer “The logistics of distribution Scorecard are the iceberg below the 1 waterline of online bookselling.” B-web type • Aggregation (e-tail) /Agora —Jeff Bezos, (auctions, Zshops) hybrid model founder and CEO, Amazon.com KEY PARTICIPANTS “Ten years from now, no one Customers • Consumers and business buyers will remember whether Context providers • Amazon.com and online Amazon.com spent an extra merchants (Amazon.com $100,000 upgrading shipping associates, Zshops, auctions) from the West Coast to the East Content providers • Amazon.com and small online merchants (Amazon.com Coast. All that will matter is associates, Zshops, auctions) whether electronic commerce • Suppliers and b-web partners gave people a good or bad (publishers; producers [OEM]; distributors e.g. Ingram Micro, experience.”2 Baker & Taylor Books, and others) —David Risher, senior vice president for Commerce services • Amazon.com and merchants merchandising, Amazon.com participating in auctions and Zshops “This [the Amazon.com • Third party shippers (UPS & USPS) distribution warehouses and Infrastructure providers • Amazon.com Drop shippers such as Ingram CFN] is the fastest expansion of • • Technology providers such as distribution capacity in Oracle, Net Perceptions, and i2 peacetime history.”3 Technologies Third party shippers (UPS, USPS) —Jeff Bezos, • founder and CEO, Amazon.com Offering • The largest online e-tailer of books, music, videos, toys, and gifts • Recently expanded service offering to include auctions (March 1999) and Zshops (September 1999)—an aggregation of merchants on its Web site • Aspires to become a one-stop shop for merchandise on the Web CFN value proposition • “Earth’s largest selection” of merchandise at competitive prices, 360 Adelaide Street W, 4th Floor a validated product assortment, Toronto, Ontario. Canada M5V 1R7 and consistent customer service Tel 416.979.7899. Fax 416.979-7616 from “home page to home www.digital4sight.com delivery”–24/7 URL • http://www.amazon.com © 2000 Digital 4Sight Corp. Reproduction by any means, or disclosure to parties who are not employees of Digital 4Sight member organizations is prohibited. Thank you for your cooperation. 1.1 Customer Fulfillment in the Digital Economy Amazon.com few barriers to entry—but one of those barriers is Amazon.com customer fulfillment. In 1996–97, Amazon.com was largely alone in the e-tailing business. Now the Web is Founder Jeff Bezos wants to transform Amazon.com into teeming with e-tailers like buy.com (which aggressively the largest and most customer-friendly one-stop shop on undercuts everyone else, including Amazon.com), the Web. Already the largest online e-tailer of books, CDNow, and barnesandnoble.com. There are also Web music, and videos, the company has expanded its portal-run malls, many of which are copying and product offering to include toys, gifts, and electronics, offering features (like the renowned “one-click and in September 1999 launched “Zshops,” a new shopping”) that have thus far differentiated initiative (online flea market on Amazon.com’s Web site) Amazon.com. Yahoo’s online mall offers 7,000 stores which offers customers “universal selection.”4 Zshops with over four million items and walmart.com’s planned empower small merchants and customers to set up debut in 2000 poses a significant threat. Amazon.com’s online stores on the Amazon.com Web site for a monthly first mover advantage, e-brand equity, and initial cost fee of $10, and a transaction fee of 1–5% of every sale. advantages (stemming from lack of investments in prime real estate for storefronts) are gradually eroding. With a market capitalization of approximately $31.4 Its margins are falling, while operating expenses from billion (as of November 1999), 12 million loyal mergers and acquisitions are increasing. As of the end of customers, 18 million items on sale, projected 1999 sales 1999, Amazon.com expected to post approximately $600 of $1.4 billion, and the most recognized brand name on million in losses for the year, at a time when growth in the Internet,5 Amazon.com aspires to become the book sales is falling (from about 800% in 1997 to a little supermall of choice for online shoppers. Its recipe over 100% in 1999). On the plus side, customer includes innovation driven by “customer obsession” and retention rates exceeded 72% in the third quarter of the ability to provide a secure, enjoyable shopping 1999.8 But average revenue per customer in 1998 was experience online, but its dominance is due to a $98.4, while average selling, general and administrative customer fulfillment process that delivers. (SG&A) and distribution costs per customer (excluding cost of goods sold) were about $71.30, leading to an A carefully orchestrated and adroitly executed “sell all, average net earnings loss of around 21%.9 carry few” strategy explains Amazon.com’s success with e-tail customer fulfillment. Its business web How has Amazon.com responded to these formidable (b-web) (for books) includes Ingram Book Group and challenges? Baker & Taylor, the two largest book wholesalers in the US, as well as dozens of others. In 1998, Amazon.com First, to increase revenue per customer, Amazon.com obtained 60% of its books through Ingram, which added product lines or capabilities practically every six operates seven strategically located US warehouses. weeks in 1999. In February, the company bought 46% of Amazon.com pays Ingram a wholesale markup a few drugstore.com. The following month, it launched online percentage points above the publisher’s price for its auctions. It bought a 35% stake in homegrocer.com in drop shipping services.6 May, 54% of pets.com in June, and 49% of gear.com in July. The Zshops and All Product Search (a “search the In 1999, Amazon.com opened five new automated Web” service) initiatives have moved it even closer to its distribution centers of its own in the US (this is in goal of providing “earth’s largest selection.” For addition to two centers already operational in Seattle Amazon.com, the Zshops initiative is 80–90% gross- and Delaware). The intent is to improve declining margin rich, since its marginal costs for providing margins in a cutthroat business (e.g. by sourcing books one-click shopping and credit card collection on Zshops directly from publishers), lessen dependence on Ingram is nearly zero. and other distributors, and extend and control its online fulfillment process to enhance competitive advantage. Second, its customer fulfillment networking (CFN) Amazon.com now offers its customers same to next day strategy is designed to increase gross margins by shipping (in the US) on most items. In the 1999 holiday sourcing directly from publishers and other season, the company sent more packages—perhaps in producers, rather than from wholesalers (e.g. excess of 15 million—to more people than any other distributors like Ingram) who provide drop shipping e-tailer or mail-order retailer in the country.7 for a premium. Amazon.com will also reduce costs Amazon.com’s leadership in customer fulfillment per sale by cross-docking orders (books, electronics, networking (CFN) will be critical to its success as the and toys all in one order) at the warehouse closest to landlord of the largest shopping mall on the Web. the customer through state-of-the-art demand forecasting and optimization solutions from i2 Business context Technologies.10 E-tailing is fast becoming a crowded marketplace with © 2000 Digital 4Sight Corp. Reproduction by any means, or disclosure to parties who are not employees of Digital 4Sight member organizations is prohibited. Thank you for your cooperation. 1.2 Customer Fulfillment in the Digital Economy Amazon.com Third, its strategy of providing hassle-free, same or next HighE-BRAND AS BARRIER TO ENTRY Less compelling day fulfillment on most items will enhance customer AMAZON.COM (Circa 2001) satisfaction and loyalty, driving repeat business, High • Landlord of largest Web referrals, and increased market share. supermall • Universal selection, one-stop shopping, and same day customer Amazon.com’s business model consists of two different fulfillment = competitive but complementary revenue, pricing, and profit models. advantage • Revenues: $2.7 Billion (est.) In the case of auctions and Zshops, relatively small • Registered Customers: 19.5 MM topline revenues (at least as of the end of 1999) • Items Offered: >18 MM contribute high gross and operating margins. In contrast, for the traditional e-tailing model, lower gross 11 AMAZON.COM (1998) and operating margins offset high topline revenues. • Book E-tailer The company wants to utilize both models: cross-sell • Investment in brand building the high margin Zshops/auctions offering to its • Customer fulfillment largely outsourced to Ingram and registered e-tailing customers (immediately enhancing Baker & Taylor E-CUSTOMER EXPECTATIONS both revenue and profits per customer), and cut the cost ONLINE PRODUCT ASSORTMENT • Revenues: $610 MM • Registered Customers: 12 MM of sales and operating expenses through efficient • Books Offered: 2.5 MM customer fulfillment. Low This strategic shift (figure 1) makes sense because Simple Complex* Low CUSTOMER FULFILLMENT AS CORE-COMPETENCE High Amazon.com’s e-brand will be a less compelling barrier * Complexity of product assortment implies both high breadth and depth of product lines offered. to entry beyond 2000, compared to its customized, collaborative, and integrated online fulfillment Figure 1. Amazon.com’s strategic shift: from book e-tailer to landlord of capability for “orders of one.” According to Andrew N. Web super mall.12 Westland, Amazon.com’s vice president of warehousing, transportation and engineering, it would risk losing its Value proposition competitive advantage from its pioneering and Amazon.com’s value proposition is “earth’s largest innovative one-to-one customer fulfillment excellence if selection—24/7, at a competitive price.” The world’s it hired another company to handle distribution.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Should We Measure the Digital Economy? 2
    Hutchins Center Working Paper #5 7 January 2020 How Should We Measure the Digital Economy? Erik Brynjolfsson MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy MIT Sloan School of Management Avinash Collis MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy MIT Sloan School of Management A BSTRACT Over the past 40 years, we’ve seen an explosion of digital goods and services: Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Skype, Wikipedia, online courses, maps, messaging, music, and all the other apps on your smartphone. Because many internet services are free, they largely go uncounted in official measures of economic activity such as GDP and Productivity (which is simply GDP/hours worked). If we want to understand how the internet is contributing to our economy, we need better ways to measure free services like Facebook, Google and Wikipedia. We developed techniques with Felix Eggers of University of Groningen that allow us to estimate the internet’s contribution to the economy. Our research suggests that there has been a substantial increase in well-being that is missed by traditional metrics like GDP, or productivity. The authors did not receive financial support from any firm or person for this article or from any firm or person with a financial or political interest in this article. Neither is currently an officer, director, or board member of any organization with an interest in this article. ________________________________________________________________________ THIS PAPER IS ONLINE AT https://www.brookings.edu/research/how- should-we-measure-the-digital-economy 1. Introduction How much would we have to pay you to give up Google search for one month? $10? $100? $1,000? How about Wikipedia? Perhaps you don’t use Google or Wikipedia at all, and so your reply is $0.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Digital Economy and Development
    UNCTAD UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT THE «NEW» DIGITAL ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT UNCTAD Technical Notes on ICT for Development N˚8 UNITED NATIONS UNCTAD, DIVISION ON TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS SCIENCE , TECHNOLOGY AND ICT BRANCH ICT POLICY SECTION TECHNICAL NOTE NO8 UNEDITED TN/UNCTAD/ICT4D/08 OCTOBER 2017 The ‘New’ Digital Economy and Development 1 Abstract : This technical note frames the ‘New’ Digital Economy (NDE) as including, most prominently: 1) advanced manufacturing, robotics and factory automation, 2) new sources of data from mobile and ubiquitous Internet connectivity, 3) cloud computing, 4) big data analytics, and 5) artificial intelligence. The main driver of the NDE is the continued exponential improvement in the cost-performance of information and communications technology (ICT), mainly microelectronics, following Moore’s Law. This is not new. The digitization of design, advanced manufacturing, robotics, communications, and distributed computer networking (e.g. the Internet) have been altering innovation processes, the content of tasks, and the possibilities for the relocation of work for decades. However, three features of the NDE are relatively novel. First, new sources of data, from smart phones to factory sensors, are sending vast quantities of data into the “cloud,” where they can be analysed to generate new insights, products, and services. Second, new business models based on technology and product platforms — platform innovation, platform ownership, and platform complimenting — are significantly altering the organization of industries and the terms of competition in a range of leading-edge industries and product categories. Third, the performance of ICT hardware and software has advanced to the point where artificial intelligence and machine learning applications are proliferating.
    [Show full text]
  • Rtcaptcha: a Real-Time CAPTCHA Based Liveness Detection System
    rtCaptcha: A Real-Time CAPTCHA Based Liveness Detection System Erkam Uzun, Simon Pak Ho Chung, Irfan Essa and Wenke Lee Department of Computer Science Georgia Institute of Technology, USA Defense Threat Threat Sec. of Current Proposed User Sec. of Proposed Background Cloud Services Attacks Conclusion Methods Model Example Systems System Study System 1 Face Authentication Systems Background rtCaptcha: A Real-Time CAPTCHA Based Liveness Detection System, NDSS 2018 2 Defense Threat Threat Sec. of Current Proposed User Sec. of Proposed Background Cloud Services Attacks Conclusion Methods Model Example Systems System Study System Deep Learning Outperforms rtCaptcha: A Real-Time CAPTCHA Based Liveness Detection System, NDSS 2018 3 Defense Threat Threat Sec. of Current Proposed User Sec. of Proposed Background Cloud Services Attacks Conclusion Methods Model Example Systems System Study System Deployed by Major Companies Face Verification Cloud Services ◉ Microsoft Cognitive Services [3] ◉ Amazon Rekognition [4] ◉ Face++ [5] ◉ Kairos Human Analytics [6] rtCaptcha: A Real-Time CAPTCHA Based Liveness Detection System, NDSS 2018 4 Defense Threat Threat Sec. of Current Proposed User Sec. of Proposed Background Cloud Services Attacks Conclusion Methods Model Example Systems System Study System Attack Channels of Biometric Authentication rtCaptcha: A Real-Time CAPTCHA Based Liveness Detection System, NDSS 2018 5 Defense Threat Threat Sec. of Current Proposed User Sec. of Proposed Background Cloud Services Attacks Conclusion Methods Model Example Systems System Study System Adversarial Models vs Defense Systems 3D Face Still Video 3D Mask Model, Image Replay Attack DL-Based Attack Attack Attacks CHpa CHpa CHpa CHca Motion Extra Blink, consist., H/W, e.g., Smile… Texture, ? IR, Depth Reflect.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Case Study
    Last updated: August 2002 Amazon.com Case Update Amazon.com Inc. (stock: AMZN) is undoubtedly the poster child for Internet retail businesses. It is the No. 1 Internet retailer of books, music, DVDs and videos, and has 26 million active customers in more than 220 countries as of first quarter 2002. In 2001, Interbrand's annual World's Most Valuable Brands survey ranked Amazon.com as the 76th most valuable brand in the world, ahead of Burger King and Shell, among others. According to MMXI Europe Audience Ratings Report, the Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.de and parent Amazon.com site are the top three online retail sites in Europe, based on reach. Amazon's founder and chairman, Jeff Bezos, was Time magazine's "Man of the Year" in 1999. Amazon.com has evolved from an online bookseller to a general merchant, and today is the largest online retailer. It claims that it has “the Earth’s biggest selection” of products in categories such as books, music, DVDs, videos, toys, electronics, software, video games, lawn and patio, kitchen and home improvement. The company has also created Web-based marketplaces, including Amazon Marketplace, Amazon.com Auctions and zShops, where businesses or individuals can sell virtually anything. The Amazon.com family of websites also includes Internet Movie Database (www.imdb.com), a comprehensive source of information on more than 300,000 movies and entertainment programs and 1 million cast and crew members dating from 1892 to the present. Amazon Anywhere (www.amazon.com/anywhere) marks the company's entrance into mobile e-commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • A Common Framework for Measuring the Digital Economy
    www.oecd.org/going-digital-toolkit www.oecd.org/SDD A ROADMAP TOWARD A COMMON FRAMEWORK @OECDinnovation @OECD_STAT FOR MEASURING THE [email protected] DIGITAL ECONOMY [email protected] Report for the G20 Digital Economy Task Force SAUDI ARABIA, 2020 A roadmap toward a common framework for measuring the Digital Economy This document was prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) and Statistics and Data Directorate (SDD), as an input for the discussions in the G20 Digital Economy Task Force in 2020, under the auspices of the G20 Saudi Arabia Presidency in 2020. It benefits from input from the European Commission, ITU, ILO, IMF, UNCTAD, and UNSD as well as from DETF participants. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily represent the official views of the member countries of the OECD or the G20. Acknowledgements: This report was drafted by Louise Hatem, Daniel Ker, and John Mitchell of the OECD, under the direction of Dirk Pilat, Deputy Director for Science, Technology, and Innovation. Contributions were gratefully received from collaborating International Organisations: Antonio Amores, Ales Capek, Magdalena Kaminska, Balazs Zorenyi, and Silvia Viceconte, European Commission; Martin Schaaper and Daniel Vertesy, ITU; Olga Strietska-Ilina, ILO; Marshall Reinsdorf, IMF; Torbjorn Fredriksson, Pilar Fajarnes, and Scarlett Fondeur Gil, UNCTAD; and Ilaria Di Matteo, UNSD. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taking Economy: Uber, Information, and Power
    ESSAY THE TAKING ECONOMY: UBER, INFORMATION, AND POWER Ryan Calo∗ & Alex Rosenblat∗∗ Sharing economy firms such as Uber and Airbnb facilitate trusted transactions between strangers on digital platforms. This creates eco- nomic and other value but raises concerns around racial bias, safety, and fairness to competitors and workers that legal scholarship has begun to address. Missing from the literature, however, is a fundamen- tal critique of the sharing economy grounded in asymmetries of infor- mation and power. This Essay, coauthored by a law professor and a technology ethnographer who studies work, labor, and technology, furnishes such a critique and proposes a meaningful response through updates to consumer protection law. ∗. Lane Powell and D. Wayne Gittinger Assistant Professor of Law, University of Washington School of Law. ∗∗. Researcher and Technical Writer, Data & Society Research Institute. The authors would like to thank Christo Wilson, Yan Shvartzshnaider, and Michelle Miller at Coworker.org; Nayantara Mehta and Rebecca Smith at the National Employment Law Project; participants in the Berkeley Law Privacy Law Scholars Conference; participants in the Loyola Law School faculty workshop; participants in the University of Pennsylvania IP colloquium; and danah boyd, Stacy Abder, Shana Kimball, Janet Haven, Julia Ticona, Alexandra Mateescu, Caroline Jack, and Shannon McCormack for thoughtful insights, comments, and feedback. The Uber Policy Team also provided helpful comments, which we try to address throughout the paper. Madeline Lamo, the librarians at Gallagher Law Library, and Patrick Davidson provided excellent research and editing. Rosenblat’s ongoing qualitative research on ride-hail drivers from 2014–2017 is vari- ously funded by Microsoft Research (FUSE grant–Peer Economy, 2014); the MacArthur Foundation (Intelligent & Autonomy Grant, 2014–2016); Open Society Foundations (Future of Work, 2014); and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Mapping Inequalities in the On-Demand Economy, 2017–2018).
    [Show full text]
  • New Strategies for the Platform Economy
    SPECIAL COLLECTION STRATEGY New Strategies for the Platform Economy To reap the rewards and avoid the risks, companies exploring a platform business model must look carefully at their partnerships and growth strategy. Brought to you by: SPRING 2021 NEW STRATEGIES FOR THE PLATFORM ECONOMY SPECIAL REPORT 1 9 17 Competing on How Healthy Is Your Platform Scaling, Platforms Business Ecosystem? Fast and Slow THE DOMINANT DIGITAL PLATFORMS are now among the world’s most phases. At each stage, there are specific early valuable — and most powerful — companies, leaving a huge swath of organizations forced indicators to look for that point to potential to play by their rules. In this new competitive environment, businesses need new ways to failure. Tracking the appropriate metrics gain advantage despite platforms’ constraints and market clout. And businesses seeking to for each stage and being alert to red flags create successful platform ecosystems find that while the rewards can be great, the helps businesses pivot to a new approach or likelihood of failure is high. This special report examines the challenges faced by both limit their losses. platform owners and participants. Platforms aiming for market dominance have typically prioritized rapid growth. The asymmetries in power and infor- attention from U.S. and European regulators, However, Max Büge and Pinar Ozcan have mation between platform owners and the whose scrutiny of dominant platforms’ found that scaling quickly is not the right businesses reliant on them have implications practices may lead to shifts in the prevailing strategy in all circumstances: Pursuing fast for the traditional levers of competitive balance of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Remarks Here
    More than a year ago, this Subcommittee launched an investigation into digital markets. Our two objectives have been to document competition problems in the digital economy, and to evaluate whether the current antitrust framework is able to properly address them. In September 2019, the Chairman and Ranking Members of the Full Committee and the Subcommittee issued sweeping, bipartisan requests for information to the four firms that will testify at today’s hearing. Since then, we have received millions of pages of evidence from these firms, as well as documents and submissions from more than 100 market participants. We also conducted hundreds of hours of interviews. As part of this investigation, we have held five hearings to examine the effects of online market power on innovation and entrepreneurship; data privacy; a free and diverse press; and independent businesses in the online marketplace. We have held 17 briefings and roundtables with over 35 experts and stakeholders in support of our work. This investigation has been bipartisan from the start. It has been an honor to work alongside my colleague, Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner, the Subcommittee’s Ranking Member, as well as the former Ranking Member of the Full Committee, Congressman Doug Collins. We worked closely with all the Members of the Subcommittee, who have taken this work seriously and studied these issues closely. As my colleague Congressman Ken Buck recently commented, “This is the most bipartisan effort that I have been involved with in five and a half years of Congress.” The purpose of today’s hearing is to examine the dominance of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google.
    [Show full text]
  • The Essential Guide to Telecommunications, Sixth Edition
    PRAISE FOR THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS, SIXTH EDITION “Dodd’s The Essential Guide to Telecommunications provides the history and context that make a fundamental underpinning of modern business more accessible to technologists and businesspeople alike. This new edition of her primer is an essential reference in the continuously evolving communica- tions landscape.” —Tom Hopcroft, President and CEO, Mass Technology Leadership Council “Annabel Dodd’s book is a clear guide and big-picture view of technologies and industries. It is an up-to-date guide for anyone who wants to be familiar with important innovations and key technologies. This is truly an industry bible for mobile, Internet, and networking services.” —Hiawatha Bray, Technology Reporter, The Boston Globe “Ms. Dodd’s aptly titled The Essential Guide to Telecommunications has been my bible for all things telecom since my days as an AT&T transmission network engineer nearly twenty years ago. Exhaus- tively and meticulously researched, concisely written for lay folks and techs/engineers alike, this book aids me in my current role as an IT Support Technician II when discussing new technology with our telecommunications department. Thank you to Ms. Dodd for keeping us all current!” —Todd Garbarini, IT Support Technician II Commvault Systems, Inc. “The Essential Guide to Telecommunications is probably one of the most useful and well-written books on our telecom bookshelf. Annabel Z. Dodd does a great job of capturing a snapshot of the current telecom industry. Even those with little or no technical training should be able to understand the text. This is the perfect book for salespeople who want to learn more about the products and services they are selling, or for those who just want to keep up to date on the latest in telecom technology.” —William Van Hefner, President, Vantek Communications, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Attendee Guide for Oil & Gas Professionals
    oil & gas Interactive attendee guide for Oil & Gas Professionals Hello, On behalf of the entire AWS Worldwide Oil & Gas team, welcome to re:Invent 2018! This year’s conference is going to be our Welcome. biggest yet, with 50,000+ attendees and more than 2,000 technical sessions. To get the most out of re:Invent, we encourage you to take advantage of the resources outlined in this document, including our “How to re:Invent” video series. Keep in mind that reserved seating goes live on October 11. You can start planning your schedule at any time by logging into your account, visiting the session catalog, and marking sessions of interest. Although re:Invent is a big conference, the strength of the Oil & Gas community makes it feel much smaller. We look forward to seeing you in Vegas! Arno van den Haak Business Development, AWS Worldwide Oil & Gas © 2018 | Amazon Web Services. All rights reserved. Table of contents What to expect in 2018 » Let’s get started. re:Invent agenda » Oil & Gas sessions » This guide is designed to help attendees of AWS re:Invent 2018 plan their experience and identify breakout sessions and events of interest. It is intended to complement the re:Invent app, Other recommended sessions » which will help attendees navigate the conference on-site. Networking opportunities » Click on the links to navigate this guide. Executive Summit overview » Event venues and logistics » AWS Oil & Gas contacts » © 2018 | Amazon Web Services. All rights reserved. What to expect Networking re:Invent Agenda Oil & Gas Other Recommended Executive Summit Event Venue AWS Oil & Gas in 2018 Sessions Sessions Opportunities Overview and Logistics Expert Contacts What Where AWS re:Invent is a learning conference hosted by Amazon Web We are taking over Las Vegas--with events at the ARIA, Vdara, Services (AWS) for the global cloud computing community.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Officials Pitched Their Facial Recognition Software to ICE 24 October 2018, by Matt Day, the Seattle Times
    Amazon officials pitched their facial recognition software to ICE 24 October 2018, by Matt Day, The Seattle Times Amazon officials earlier this year pitched the employee sent to someone at ICE containing a link company's controversial facial recognition software to an Amazon blog post questioning the ACLU's to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement methodology in its experiment on members of agency, according to documents uncovered by the Congress and sticking up for Rekognition's utility. Project on Government Oversight. The link "may be of interest given your ongoing efforts," the sales employee wrote. The disclosure comes as Amazon's product and similar tools built by other companies come under The second email, also from an AWS sales scrutiny from civil-liberties groups, legislators and employee, referred to an apparent meeting in June even some of their own employees because of the between AWS employees and a representative of technology's potential for misuse. ICE's Homeland Security Investigations team at the Redwood City, Calif., offices of consulting giant The relationship between high-tech firms and ICE McKinsey & Co. Included on a list of follow-up has also been a flashpoint since the outcry over items was a bullet point about Rekognition's the agency's enforcement of a Trump capabilities. "Thanks again for your interest in AWS administration policy of separating migrant parents to support ICE and the HSI mission," the email and children arriving at the U.S. border. Employee concluded. groups at Microsoft, Google and Amazon have all raised concerns about their companies' Matthew Bourke, a spokesman for ICE, said in an relationship with ICE or Defense Department emailed statement that the agency doesn't have a projects.
    [Show full text]
  • John Benjamin Schafer
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA This is to certify that I have examined this bound copy of a doctoral thesis by John Benjamin Schafer and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Joseph A. Konstan _______________________________________________________ Name of Faculty Advisor _______________________________________________________ Signature of Faculty Advisor _______________________________________________________ Date John T. Riedl _______________________________________________________ Name of Faculty Advisor _______________________________________________________ Signature of Faculty Advisor _______________________________________________________ Date GRADUATE SCHOOL MetaLens: A Framework for Multi-source Recommendations A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY John Benjamin Schafer IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July 2001 John Benjamin Schafer 2001 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis was possible thanks to the help and support of many people. Thank you to my colleagues in the GroupLens research project and our predecessors. Specifically, thank you to Jon Herlocker for being the student leadership the group needed for so many years. Thank you to Dan Cosley, Nathan Good, Tony Lam, Sean McNee, and Badrul Sarwar for your support of and contributions to this research. Thank you to my co-advisors, mentors, and, yes, friends, Professors Joseph Konstan and John Riedl. Both in and out of the classroom, you have demonstrated that teaching and learning go hand-in-hand and can occur when you least expect it. As I continue my career, I will always remember the many lessons that you have taught. Thank you to the original Dr. Schafer – my father, John.
    [Show full text]