Sources for Studying Politicians and Political Parties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sources for Studying Politicians and Political Parties Politicians and Political Parties A Guide to Materials at Hull History Centre Worship Street Hull, HU2 8BG Introduction Hull History Centre holds over 2000 collections which cover a huge range of subjects. Finding your way through this to identify material that interests you can be daunting. The following is a guide to materials held at Hull History Centre on the subject of Politicians and Political Parties. The guide is intended to aid the researcher in the identification of archival collections for use in research projects, dissertations and theses. Entries in this guide provide brief summaries of individual collection titles, covering dates, and content. More detailed descriptions of content can be found on the History Centre’s online catalogue, where you can also download PDF versions of individual catalogues. The online catalogue can be accessed at catalogue.historycentrecatalogue.org.uk. Materials listed in this guide are not exhaustive and so you should also use the History Centre’s online catalogue to search for terms specific to your research topic. The History Centre’s website contains further guides to our collections which might also be of use to researchers looking to identify resources. The website can be accessed at www.hullhistorycentre.org.uk. Should you require any further advice, this guide has been prepared by the Hull University Archives team who are happy to help in any way they can. Questions should be directed to HUA staff at [email protected] by marking enquiries ‘FAO HUA Archives Staff’ in the subject line. Hints and Tips In addition to the below collections, there may be other material relating to politicians and political parties amongst the holdings of Hull History Centre. You can identify this material by using the online catalogue (link above). Try key words such as an individual’s name, the name of a party, political positions such as ‘Communist’, ‘Conservative’, ‘Labour’, ‘Socialist’ etc. Searches such as these might turn up individual items such as letters, reports, newspaper articles etc. hidden within seemingly unrelated collections. Updated 2017/18 © H u l l H i s t o r y C e n t r e P a g e | 1 Hull University Archives Collections Reference Collection Description Covering Dates U DSD Social Democratic Party Minutes, subject files, 1974-1990 (Beverley and Haltemprice campaign literature, press Branch) cuttings, accounts, newsletters, rules, pamphlets U DX217 Hull Fabian Society Annual reports, lists of 1943-1948 subscribers and members, notices of meetings, press cuttings, rules U DX142 Labour Party (Public Health Article, minutes, notes, 1941-1965 Advisory Committee) booklet U DX222 Yorkshire Regional Council of the Minutes, financial 1973-1991 Labour Party (and Campaign for statements, annual Labour Party Democracy) reports, constitution, agenda, pamphlets, correspondence U DX124 Hull Labour Party Correspondence, 1955-1973 campaign material, pamphlets U DLP Hull Labour Party Uncatalogued 20th cent. U DX78 Social Democratic Federation Letters, speech transcript, 1886-1948 (J.E. Barlas) pamphlet U DMG International Marxist Group Bulletins, reports, minutes, 1955-1976 constitution, circulars, newsletters U DCP Communist Party of Great Britain Minutes, banner, 1970-1989 (Hull Branch) correspondence, conference papers U DP201 Workers International League Photograph 1942 U DX211 Revolutionary Communist Party Issues of journal ‘Militant’ 1944-1947 U DX202 Trotskyism Dissertation 1990 U DX306 Patrick Wall Article 2006 U DX237 Daniel Chater Autobiography 1951 U DX112 Robert Arthur Taylor Diary 1928 U DX327 Barry Sheerman Correspondence, research 1910-1990s papers, parliamentary papers U DAAJ Alan Johnson Subject files containing 1970s-2017 speeches, notes, papers, correspondence, press cuttings U DBP Benjamin Theaker Parkin Correspondence, subject 1918-1975 files, press cuttings, speeches, photographs, pamphlets U DCS Clive Soley Press cuttings, subject 1973-2004 files, draft of book U DFL Bernard Floud Correspondence, subject 1923-1969 files, press cuttings, memoranda, photographs, school reports U DHY Robin Maxwell-Hyslop Press cuttings, speeches, 1966-1999 correspondence U DJJ James Johnson Correspondence, press 1940s-1980s cuttings, photographs, publications U DLS Hastings Bertrand Lees-Smith Correspondence, notes, 1909-1990 speeches, reports, articles, press cuttings Updated 2017/18 © H u l l H i s t o r y C e n t r e P a g e | 2 U DMC J. Kevin McNamara Subject files, 1947-2005 correspondence U DME John Ellis Constituency case files, 1964-1979 subject files, desk diaries, press cuttings U DMH Frank Hooley Correspondence, case 1948-1970 files, subject files U DMJ Peter Jackson Correspondence, reports, 1966-1970 campaign material U DMK Anne Patricia Kerr Correspondence, diary 1952-1973 sheets, subject files, press cuttings U DML Eric Lubbock Subject files, case files 1962-2014 U DMM Austin Mitchell Subject files, case files, 1954-2002 correspondence U DMN Charles George Ammon Correspondence, diaries 1886-1971 and journals, press cuttings, photographs, writings, papers on various subjects U DMO Will Howie Case files, subject files 1950-1970 U DMP Christopher Price Correspondence, subject 1947-2000 files, reports, press cuttings U DMR John Prescott Correspondence, subject 1966-2001 files, photographs U DMU Chris Mullin Subject files, articles, 1970-2010 press cuttings, drafts of writings, diaries, reports, speeches U DMW David Winnick Correspondence, notes, 1966-1990 subject files, diaries, press cuttings U DMY Elliot Morley Correspondence files 1988-1994 U DPK Patrick Cormack Correspondence files, 1990s-2000s subject files U DPU Harry Pursey Correspondence files, 1917-1971 subject files, press cuttings U DPW Patrick Wall Diaries, case files, 1890-1992 correspondence files, subject files, writings, publications, military papers, accounts U DRH Roy Sydney Hattersley Correspondence, cassette 1970s-1997 recordings, speeches, articles, press cuttings, photographs U DSH Somerville Hastings Notebooks, photographs, 1860-1965 letters U DX327 Barry Sheerman Research papers, 1910-1990s parliamentary papers U DX112 Robert Arthur Taylor Diary 1928 Updated 2017/18 © H u l l H i s t o r y C e n t r e P a g e | 3 City Archives and Local Studies Collections Reference Collection Description Covering Dates C DFX/9/4 Hull Labour Party Diary 1936 C DIAA Alderman John Atkinson Magazines, reports, 1929-1999 minutes C DIPD/2 Hull Labour Party Municipal Poster, leaflet c.1933 Campaign C DJC/1/24 Hull Labour Friends of Israel Programmes 1979 C DJC/1/28/1/1 Trades Advisory Council Minutes 1944-1951 C DPM/30/1 East Hull Industrial Labour Party Survey plan for 117 Abbey 1912 Street C TCUE/4/4/3 West Hull Independent Labour Letter c.1890 Party L WH Winifred Holtby Letters 20th cent. C DFX/55/7 Hull Cooperative Society Letter 7 Jan 1959 C DIKC/2 Hull Cooperative Society Photographs, speech 1943-1945 programme, rules, membership card, report C DMX/230 Central Branch of the Hull Co- Scrapbook 1925-1940s operative Women’s Guild L 334.5 Cooperative Movement in Hull Book n.d. Lp.352/2 Cooperative Society Illustration of Jameson c.1930 Street property Lp.334.5/1 Cooperative Society Illustration of Jameson c.1930 Street property C WM/82 Cooperative Movement in Hull Minutes, resolutions, 1857 petition C DBHM/16/56 Cooperative Movement in Hull Book 1951 C DSCG/1 Cooperative Movement in Hull Scrapbook of photographs 1976-1977 and postcards C TCCH/3/35 Hull Cooperative Society Letter, resolution 15 Nov 1899 C DPV/2/3/5336, Hull Cooperative Society Property valuations 1913-1915 9948, 10650, C DPV/2/4/1032 C TYR ARP Personnel Cards Cards names, occupations 1939-1945 and places of work of individuals undertaking ARP service Updated 2017/18 © H u l l H i s t o r y C e n t r e P a g e | 4 .
Recommended publications
  • The House of Lords in 2005: a More Representative and Assertive Chamber?
    The House of Lords in 2005: A More Representative and Assertive Chamber? By Meg Russell and Maria Sciara February 2006 ISBN: 1 903 903 47 5 Published by The Constitution Unit School of Public Policy UCL (University College London) 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU Tel: 020 7679 4977 Fax: 020 7679 4978 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/ ©The Constitution Unit, UCL 2006 This report is sold subject to the condition that is shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. First Published February 2006 2 Contents Preface............................................................................................................................................................1 Summary of key points................................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................5 Lords reform doesn’t happen (again)........................................................................................................5 Changing composition: a more representative chamber? ......................................................................7 The Prevention of Terrorism
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • MPS-0746712/1 the GUARDIAN 18.3.68 Police Repel Anti—War Mob
    MPS-0746712/1 THE GUARDIAN 18.3.68 Police repel anti—war mob at US embassy BY OUR OWN REPORTERS Britain's biggest anti-Vietnam war demonstration ended in London yesterday with an estimated 300 arrests: 86 people were treated by the St John Ambulance Brigade for injuries and 50, including 25 policemen, one with serious spine injury, were taken to hospital. Demonstrators and police—mounted and on foot—engaged in a protracted battle, throwing stones, earth, firecrackers and smoke bombs. Plastic blood, an innovation, added a touch of vicarious brutality. It was only after considerable provocation that police tempers began to fray and truncheons were used, and then only for a short time. The demonstrators seemed determined to stay until they had provoked a violent response of some sort from the police. This intention became paramount once they entered Grosvenor Square. Mr Peter Jackson, Labour MP for High Peak, said last night that he would put down a question in the Commons today about "unnecessary violence by police." Earlier in the afternoon, members of the Monday Club, including two MPs, Mr Patrick Wall and Mr John Biggs- Davison, handed in letters expressing support to the United States and South Vietnamese embassies More than 1,000 police were waiting for the demonstrators in Grosvenor Square. They gathered in front of the embassy while diagonal lines stood shoulder to shoulder to cordon off the corners of the square closest to the building. About 10 coaches filled with constables waited in the space to rush wherever they were needed and a dozen mounted police rode into the square about a quarter of an hour before the demonstrators arrived.
    [Show full text]
  • OIL and SANCTIONS the Times, London, May 9, 1966 The
    SOUTHERN AFRICA NEWS BULLETIN Committee on Southern Africa, National Student Christian Federation, 475 Riverside Drive, New York, N. Y., 10027. Room 754. RHODESIA NEWS SUMv4ARY Weekof May 5 -ll EDITORIALS AND PERSONAL COMMEM The Economist - May 7, 1966 Letter to the Editor from Patrick Wall, House of Commons. "I wonder if your article "Talks about Talks" (April 30) has really struck the right balance. The implication is that Rhodesia's economy is being rapidly eroded by sanctions and that the South Africans are not prepared to offer them long-term support. As far as one can ascertain it would seem that Rhodesia's economy has remained remarkably buoyant after nearly sic months of sanctions. It is true that the policy of sanctions may have made Rhodesians more amenable to negotiations but surely this is also true of the British economy. The total cost of the Rhodes ian campaign in visibles and invisibles has been estimated at some 1200 million in a full year and it must now be clar to Mr. Wilson that whether he likes it or not the next step will be the imposition of mandatory sanctions by the United Nations not only on Rhodesia but also on Scuth Africa and the Portuguese territories. The first and major victim of this step would be the British economy--deprived of our third best trade partner the blow might be mortal. I believe that these factors together with the ,strongly expressed views of the Governor and the Chief Justice must be foremost in Mr. Wilson's mind and it is surely he, rather than Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • By-Election Results: Revised November 2003 1987-92
    Factsheet M12 House of Commons Information Office Members Series By-election results: Revised November 2003 1987-92 Contents There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Summary 2 Parliament. Of these by-elections, eight resulted Notes 3 Tables 3 in a change in winning party compared with the Constituency results 9 1987 General Election. The Conservatives lost Contact information 20 seven seats of which four went to the Liberal Feedback form 21 Democrats and three to Labour. Twenty of the by- elections were caused by the death of the sitting Member of Parliament, while three were due to resignations. This Factsheet is available on the internet through: http://www.parliament.uk/factsheets November 2003 FS No.M12 Ed 3.1 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2003 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 By-election results: 1987-92 House of Commons Information Office Factsheet M12 Summary There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Parliament. This introduction gives some of the key facts about the results. The tables on pages 4 to 9 summarise the results and pages 10 to 17 give results for each constituency. Eight seats changed hands in the 1987 Parliament at by-elections. The Conservatives lost four seats to Labour and three to the Liberal Democrats. Labour lost Glasgow, Govan to the SNP. The merger of the Liberal Party and Social Democratic Party took place in March 1988 with the party named the Social and Liberal Democrats. This was changed to Liberal Democrats in 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • "No Return to 1961 in Rhodesia" (299)
    SOUTHERN AFRICA NEWS BULLETIN Committee on Southern Africa, National Student Christian Federation, 475 Riverside Drive, New York, N.Y., 10027. Room 754 RHODESIA NEWS SUMMARY Week of June 16-22, 1966 EDITORIALS AND PERSONAL COMMENTS The Times, London - June 21 "The farmers are now thought to see that if a settlement is not reached soon they will have to abandon next year's crop (tobacco) after heavy losses on this year's. Their reaction will be the acid test. If they prefer to abandon tobacco for subsistence farming rather than press Mr. Smith to a compromise - which their friends in business already urge - then Britain and Africa generally must sit down to besiege Rhodesia until it is received, or the world concert on sanctions breaks down. Neither result is desirable in British or African interests. It is right therefore for the officials to work over every formula that embodies Britaints basic principles on African constitu tional advancement and African consent to the final settlement." Manchester Guardian Weekly - June 16 Edftorial:' "No return to 1961 in Rhodesia" Perhaps the talks have already turned into negotiations, and if so Mr. Wilson should explain what they are about. Three factors can be considered in turn: sanctions, relations with Zambia, and Britain's aims in the Salisbury talks. Last week the President of the Rhodesian Associated Chambers of Commerce warned that many firms were struggling for existence. Dwindling stocks, import licenses, and the exchange control have been taking their toll for weeks, but this is the first public statement from business. The government has clearly been disguising the effect of sanctions; the petrol entering the country has to be paid for.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Labour League of Youth
    University of Huddersfield Repository Webb, Michelle The rise and fall of the Labour league of youth Original Citation Webb, Michelle (2007) The rise and fall of the Labour league of youth. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/761/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ THE RISE AND FALL OF THE LABOUR LEAGUE OF YOUTH Michelle Webb A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Huddersfield July 2007 The Rise and Fall of the Labour League of Youth Abstract This thesis charts the rise and fall of the Labour Party’s first and most enduring youth organisation, the Labour League of Youth.
    [Show full text]
  • E-News for Somatosensory Rehabilitation Ronald Melzack’S Special Issue
    e-News for Somatosensory Rehabilitation Ronald Melzack’s special issue Powered by : www.neuropain.ch Ronald MELZACK’s Special issue Canada Canada H MERSKEY M ZAFFRAN TL PACKHAM Israel M DEVOR USA CJ WOOLF United Kingdom Switzerland C McCABE A ROEDER Argentina Australia S FRIGERI GL MOSELEY Editorial Claude J SPICHER BSc OT p4 Foreword Ronald MELZACK OC, OQ, FRSC, PhD p5 1 Article Harold MERSKEY DM, FRCPC Canada p6 2 Article G Lorimer MOSELEY PhD, FACP Australia p7 3 Article Candida S McCABE PhD, RGN United-Kingdom p9 4 Article Clifford J WOOLF MB, BCh, PhD USA p11 5 Article Marshall DEVOR PhD Israel p12 6 Article Sandra B FRIGERI OT Argentina p17 7 Article Tara L PACKHAM MSc, OT Reg Ont Canada p18 8 Article Marc ZAFFRANMD Canada p19 9 Article Angie ROEDERPT Switzerland p20 1 e-News for Somatosensory Rehabilitation Ronald Melzack’s special issue France Belgium V SORIOT B MORLION USA Netherlands SW STRALKA RSGM PEREZ Switzerland P SPICHER United Kingdom M FITZGERALD Lebanon H ABU-SAAD HUIJER South Africa Brazil Spain TLB LE ROUX S de ANDRADE R GÁLVEZ L PRINGLE 10 Article Pascale SPICHER PhD Switzerland p22 11 Article Roberto SGM PEREZ PT, PhD Netherlands p25 12 Article Vincent SORIOTMD France p27 13 Article Theo LB LE ROUX MD South Africa p28 14 Article Maria FITZGERALD BA, PhD, FMedSci United-Kingdom p29 15 Article Bart MORLIONMD Belgium p31 16 Article Sibele de ANDRADE MELO PT, PhD Brazil p32 17 Article Lynne PRINGLE OT, BA Psych South Africa p33 18 Article Susan W STRALKA PT, DPT, MS USA p34 19 Article Rafael GÁLVEZ MD Spain p35 20 Article Huda ABU-SAAD HUIJER RN, PhD, FEANS, FAAN Lebanon p36 Powered by : www.NoSpe.ch 2 e-News for Somatosensory Rehabilitation Ronald Melzack’s special issue Ronald MELZACK’s Special issue chosen by Claude J.
    [Show full text]
  • Polls Reveal Public .Lic and Political Support for Access'55 to Personal Fill
    Newspaper of the Campaign for Freedom of Information Number 10 Number 10 Polls reveal public .lic and political support for access '55 to personal fill 146 MP's say I yes' to 65 % of public say I yt Private Member's Bill to right to know Close to two-thirds of tbe Britisb public helieve that Britain I Two polls conducted on behalf of the Campaign for Freedom of Freedom of Information Act. Information, one an opinion poll of the public (see story op­ A major opinion poll carried out for tbe Campaign for Free posite), and one a surveyof backbench Members of Parliament, Information of a representative sample of 1909 people hy th reveal overwhelming support for legislation to allow individuals Organization produced tbe following result: to have access to files held on them by the authorities. Would you favour or oppose a Freedom ofInformation Ac right of access to information collected by public authorities, The chances of success for a Private Members Bill in the to adequate saf eguards for national security, crime preventi. autumn are high, for 146 Members of Parliament have personal privacy? indicated that they support the bill in principle, including Favour 65 per cent 54 Conservatives. Oppose 23 per cent Many have indicated theywill personally introduce the Billif Sir Frank Cooper, formek Cooper, former Perma­ Do n't kn ow/no opinion 11 per cent. nent Secretary at the Miretary at the Ministry of Of particular no te to tbe Prime Minister is that 69'70 of Cons. they come high in the Private Members Ballot.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Annual Report 2019
    Labour Party | Annual Report 2019 LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Treasurers’ Responsibilities . 54 Foreword from Jeremy Corbyn . 5 Independent Auditor’s Report Introduction from Tom Watson . 7 to the members of the Labour Party . 55 Introduction from the General Secretary . 9 Consolidated income and expenditure account 2018/2019 National Executive Committee . 10 for the year ended 31 December 2018 . 57 NEC Committees . 12 Statements of comprehensive income Obituaries . 13 and changes in equity for the year ended NEC aims and objectives for 2019 . 14 31 December 2018 . 58 Consolidated balance sheet BY-ELECTIONS . 15 at 31 December 2018 . 59 Peterborough . 16 Consolidated cash flow statement for the year Newport West . 17 ended 31 December 2018 . 60 ELECTIONS 2019 . 19 Notes to Financial Statements . 61 Analysis . 20 APPENDICES . 75 Local Government Report . 23 Members of Shadow Cabinet LOOKING AHEAD: 2020 ELECTIONS . 25 and Opposition Frontbench . 76 The year ahead in Scotland . 26 Parliamentary Labour Party . 80 The year ahead in Wales . 27 Members of the Scottish Parliament. 87 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 29 Members of the Welsh Assembly . 88 Members and Supporters Members of the European Parliament . 89 Renewing our party and building an active Directly Elected Mayors . 90 membership and supporters network . 30 Members of the London Assembly . 91 Equalities . 31 Leaders of Labour Groups . 92 Labour Peers . 100 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 35 Labour Police and Crime Commissioners . 103 National Policy Forum Parliamentary Candidates endorsed NPF Report . 36 by the NEC at time of publication . 104 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 39 NEC Disputes . 107 International NCC Cases .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
    Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • The NATO Parliamentary Assembly and UK Delegations
    BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP 8951, 5 November 2020 The NATO Parliamentary By Nigel Walker Assembly and UK delegations Contents: 1. Summary 2. UK delegations 3. Appendix 1: Alphabetical list of UK delegates 1955-present www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The NATO Parliamentary Assembly and UK delegations Contents 1. Summary 3 1.1 NATO Parliamentary Assembly in brief 3 1.2 The UK Delegation 6 2. UK delegations 8 2.1 2019-2024 Parliament 9 2.2 2017-2019 Parliament 10 2.3 2015-2017 Parliament 11 2.4 2010-2015 Parliament 12 2.5 2005-2010 Parliament 13 2.6 2001-2005 Parliament 14 2.7 1997-2001 Parliament 15 2.8 1992-1997 Parliament 16 2.9 1987-1992 Parliament 17 2.10 1983-1987 Parliament 18 2.11 1979-1983 Parliament 19 2.12 Oct1974-1979 Parliament 20 2.13 Feb-Oct 1974 Parliament 21 2.14 1970- Feb1974 Parliament 22 2.15 1966-1970 Parliament 23 2.16 1964-1966 Parliament 24 2.17 1959-1964 Parliament 25 2.18 1955-1959 Parliament 26 3. Appendix 1: Alphabetical list of UK delegates 1955- present 28 Cover page image copyright: Image 15116584265_f2355b15bb_o, NATO Parliamentary Assembly Pre-Summit Conference in London, 2 September 2014 by Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) – Flickr home page. Licensed by Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) license/ image cropped. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 5 November 2020 1. Summary Since being formed in 1965, the NATO Parliamentary Assembly has provided a forum for parliamentarians from the NATO Member States to promote debate on key security challenges, facilitate mutual understanding and support national parliamentary oversight of defence matters.
    [Show full text]