DOCSLIB.ORG

The NATO Parliamentary Assembly and UK Delegations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP 8951, 5 November 2020 The NATO Parliamentary By Nigel Walker Assembly and UK delegations Contents: 1. Summary 2. UK delegations 3. Appendix 1: Alphabetical list of UK delegates 1955-present www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The NATO Parliamentary Assembly and UK delegations Contents 1. Summary 3 1.1 NATO Parliamentary Assembly in brief 3 1.2 The UK Delegation 6 2. UK delegations 8 2.1 2019-2024 Parliament 9 2.2 2017-2019 Parliament 10 2.3 2015-2017 Parliament 11 2.4 2010-2015 Parliament 12 2.5 2005-2010 Parliament 13 2.6 2001-2005 Parliament 14 2.7 1997-2001 Parliament 15 2.8 1992-1997 Parliament 16 2.9 1987-1992 Parliament 17 2.10 1983-1987 Parliament 18 2.11 1979-1983 Parliament 19 2.12 Oct1974-1979 Parliament 20 2.13 Feb-Oct 1974 Parliament 21 2.14 1970- Feb1974 Parliament 22 2.15 1966-1970 Parliament 23 2.16 1964-1966 Parliament 24 2.17 1959-1964 Parliament 25 2.18 1955-1959 Parliament 26 3. Appendix 1: Alphabetical list of UK delegates 1955- present 28 Cover page image copyright: Image 15116584265_f2355b15bb_o, NATO Parliamentary Assembly Pre-Summit Conference in London, 2 September 2014 by Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) – Flickr home page. Licensed by Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) license/ image cropped. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 5 November 2020 1. Summary Since being formed in 1965, the NATO Parliamentary Assembly has provided a forum for parliamentarians from the NATO Member States to promote debate on key security challenges, facilitate mutual understanding and support national parliamentary oversight of defence matters. The Assembly also helps to strengthen the transatlantic relationship and provides many opportunities for North American and European parliamentarians to discuss their concerns, interests and differences. 1.1 NATO Parliamentary Assembly in brief Background 65 years ago – on the 18 July 1955 – 158 parliamentarians from 14 NATO nations attended a six-day meeting at NATO headquarters in Paris. This first “Conference of Members of Parliament from the NATO Countries” soon became the “NATO Parliamentarians’ Conference”. In 1966 delegates at the 12th Conference unanimously agreed to rename the organisation the “North Atlantic Assembly”. Meanwhile, with France withdrawing from NATO’s military structure that year, NATO moved its headquarters from Paris to Brussels. The Assembly headquarters moved to Brussels two years later. The North Atlantic Assembly was renamed the “NATO Parliamentary Assembly” (NATO PA) in 1999. That NATO PA website has detailed information on the Assembly’s history. Membership The NATO Parliamentary Assembly consists of 269 delegates from the 30 NATO Member States. Each delegation is based on the country’s size and the UK has 18 seats in the Assembly. In addition to delegations from NATO Member States, delegates from associate countries and parliamentary observer delegations take part in Assembly activities and bring the total number of delegates to approximately 360. Structure The Assembly’s government body is the Standing Committee, which is comprised of the Head of each member delegation, the President and Vice-Presidents of the NATO PA, the Treasurer and the Secretary General. Seven UK delegates have served as President since the organisation was founded. 4 The NATO Parliamentary Assembly and UK delegations UK delegates who served as NATO PA Presidents Madeleine Moon 2018-19 Hugh Bayley 2012-14 Dr Patrick Duffy 1988-90 Maj. Sir Patrick Wall 1983-85 Sir Geoffrey de Freitas 1977-79 John Peel 1972-73 Lord Crathorne 1962-63 Note: A complete list of Presidents from 1955-2019 is available online.1 The Assembly has five Committees – the Committee on the Civil Dimension of Security; Defence and Security Committee; Economics and Security Committee; Political Committee; and the Science and Technology Committee – and eight sub-committees. Much of the Assembly’s work is carried out by these committees, whose remit is to examine the major security and policy challenges confronting the Alliance. The Sub-committees explore policy issues in more detail. The Secretary-General leads the International Secretariat, responsible for all of the Assembly’s administration and the majority of research and analysis that supports the Assembly’s Committees, Sub-Committees and other groups. Note: See the NATO Parliamentary Assembly website for further information.2 Assembly activities The Assembly meets as a whole twice a year: a Spring Session and an Annual Session in the autumn. There are some 40 other activities held each year, with most of the Assembly’s substantive work carried out by its five committees and eight sub-committees. These committees produce reports on critical issues affecting the Alliance and, to inform their discussions, receive briefings from experts and senior officials from government and international organisations, as well as attending fact-finding missions. 1 The NATO Parliamentary Assembly website has a complete list of Presidents from 1955-2019 2 The NATO Parliamentary Assembly website has a complete list and further information on the Secretary General and the International Secretariat. 5 Commons Library Briefing, 5 November 2020 The NATO PA also has an extensive outreach programme with non- member parliaments and activities such as election monitoring. Relations with NATO Although institutionally separate from NATO, the Assembly is an essential link between NATO and the parliaments of NATO Member States. The Assembly’s decision-making body – the Standing Committee – holds annual meetings at NATO headquarters with NATO’s Secretary General and the Permanent Representatives to the North Atlantic Council. The NATO Secretary General addresses members of the Assembly at the Spring and Annual Sessions and the NATO PA President addresses Summit meetings of NATO Heads of State and Government. One of the more visible synergies between NATO and the Assembly’s work is the NATO Secretary General providing a written response to the committee reports endorsed by the Assembly at its Annual Session. 6 The NATO Parliamentary Assembly and UK delegations 1.2 The UK Delegation The NATO Parliamentary Assembly is one of three interparliamentary assemblies to which the UK Parliament sends delegations.3 The UK has 18 seats in the NATO PA and delegation members are formally appointed in a Written Statement by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. One member is also appointed to be leader of the UK delegation. Leaders of UK delegations Rt Hon Alec Shelbrooke MP 2020- Rt Hon Richard Benyon MP 2015-2019 Rt Hon Sir Menzies Campbell CBE QC MP 2010-2015 Rt Hon Bruce George MP 2005-2010 Rt Hon Lord Clark of Windermere 2001-2005 Rt Hon Donald Anderson MP 1997-2001 Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Johnson Smith MP 1987-1997 Maj. Sir Patrick Wall MC VRD MP 1979-1987 Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey de Freitas MP 1974-1979 Sir John Peel MP 1970-1974 Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey de Freitas MP 1969 Robert Edwards MP 1967-1968 Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey de Freitas MP 1964-1966 Rt Hon Lord Crathorne(a) 1958-1964 Col. Rt Hon Walter Elliot CH MC MP 1955-1957 a) Lord Crathorne led the UK Delegation as a Member of the House of Commons (Rt Hon Sir Thomas Dugdale MP) in 1958 and as a Member of the House of Lords 1959-64. The delegation is cross-party and filled with members from both Houses of Parliament, with membership reflecting the political party balance in the House of Commons at the time of the most recent General Election. Delegates must be backbenchers and, consequently, some have gaps in their service to the Assembly as they held Ministerial posts in the interim. One UK delegate – Harold Wilson MP – later went on to be the Prime Minister and five delegates have served on the Assembly from both Houses of Parliament. 3 The UK Parliament sends delegations to three interparliamentary assemblies: the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe; the NATO Parliamentary Assembly; and the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe Parliamentary Assembly. 7 Commons Library Briefing, 5 November 2020 Box 1: Delegates serving from both Chambers There are five delegates who have represented the UK from both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, with Lord Anderson, Lord Campbell and Lord Jopling currently delegates: Rt Hon Donald Anderson PC DL MP – Rt Hon Lord Anderson of Swansea PC DL Rt Hon Sir Menzies Campbell CBE PC QC MP – Rt Hon Lord Campbell of Pittenweem CH CBE PC QC Dr David Clark MP – Rt Hon Lord Clark of Windermere PC Rt Hon Sir Thomas Dugdale Bt PC TD MP – Rt Hon Lord Crathorne Bt PC TD Rt Hon Michael Jopling PC DL MP – Rt Hon Lord Jopling PC DL The UK delegation represents the UK Parliament, not the Government, and plays an active role in the activities of the Assembly, through membership of its Committees and groups and participation in plenary meetings. The UK has hosted several sessions of the NATO PA, most recently welcoming the Assembly for its 2019 Annual Session that took place in London during October of that year. On occasions where the UK hosts sessions, members of both Houses have opportunities to attend some meetings while not official delegates, but as members of relevant Select Committees, for example. The UK has experienced delegations, with five Members and Peers having served more than 20 years on the Assembly, including two current delegates. a) Current delegates 8 The NATO Parliamentary Assembly and UK delegations 2. UK delegations Members and Peers are appointed for the duration of a Parliament, although they may inform their Chief Whip if they no longer wish to serve on the delegation. Members remain as Delegation members for up to six months following the date of a General Election or until a new delegation is appointed.
Recommended publications
  • Crime at Work Increasing the Risk for Offenders Volume II

    Crime at Work Increasing the Risk for Offenders Volume II

    Crime at Work Increasing the Risk for Offenders Volume II Edited by Martin Gill © Perpetuity Press Ltd 1998 Except chapter 12 by Sheridan Morris which is © Crown copyright 1997. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policy of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, the Home Office or any other government department. * All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Totten ham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published in 1998 by Perpetuity Press Ltd Published by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin's Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries.
  • Western Europe

    Western Europe

    Western Europe GREAT BRITAIN ix years of Socialist rule came to an end at the General Election of Octo- S ber 25, 1951. Britain, however, expressed only a narrow preferment for the Conservative Party and Prime Minister Winston Churchill's administra- tion had a lead of only sixteen seats in the House of Commons, as compared with Labor's rule during the preceding twenty months with a majority of six. Political commentators had foretold a landslide for the Conservative Party but Labor retained a plurality of the total votes cast. As in previous years, domestic issues were most persistent in the campaign; but while the cost of living and the housing problem were the dominant issues, the loss of prestige suffered by Britain in the Middle East as a result of the dispute with Iran and the denunciation by Egypt of its 1936 treaty with Great Britain were undoubtedly factors in terminating the Socialist regime. In its attitude to Germany and Western Europe, Conservative policy did not radically vary from its predecessor's, promising only limited participation in any scheme for European unity. The Labor Party voted against ratification of the Contrac- tual Agreement with the Bonn Government in July 1952 on the grounds that this agreement was premature, offering Germany rearmament that would per- manently divide the country and sharpen divisions with Russia before all possibilities of German unification had been explored. Nor was the Labor Party satisfied that Chancellor Konrad Adenauer had the full backing of the West German people. Issues affecting the Jews were absent from the 1951 election, and only a few minor anti-Semitic manifestations occurred during the campaign.
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To

    'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To

    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
  • MPS-0746712/1 the GUARDIAN 18.3.68 Police Repel Anti—War Mob

    MPS-0746712/1 the GUARDIAN 18.3.68 Police Repel Anti—War Mob

    MPS-0746712/1 THE GUARDIAN 18.3.68 Police repel anti—war mob at US embassy BY OUR OWN REPORTERS Britain's biggest anti-Vietnam war demonstration ended in London yesterday with an estimated 300 arrests: 86 people were treated by the St John Ambulance Brigade for injuries and 50, including 25 policemen, one with serious spine injury, were taken to hospital. Demonstrators and police—mounted and on foot—engaged in a protracted battle, throwing stones, earth, firecrackers and smoke bombs. Plastic blood, an innovation, added a touch of vicarious brutality. It was only after considerable provocation that police tempers began to fray and truncheons were used, and then only for a short time. The demonstrators seemed determined to stay until they had provoked a violent response of some sort from the police. This intention became paramount once they entered Grosvenor Square. Mr Peter Jackson, Labour MP for High Peak, said last night that he would put down a question in the Commons today about "unnecessary violence by police." Earlier in the afternoon, members of the Monday Club, including two MPs, Mr Patrick Wall and Mr John Biggs- Davison, handed in letters expressing support to the United States and South Vietnamese embassies More than 1,000 police were waiting for the demonstrators in Grosvenor Square. They gathered in front of the embassy while diagonal lines stood shoulder to shoulder to cordon off the corners of the square closest to the building. About 10 coaches filled with constables waited in the space to rush wherever they were needed and a dozen mounted police rode into the square about a quarter of an hour before the demonstrators arrived.
  • OIL and SANCTIONS the Times, London, May 9, 1966 The

    OIL and SANCTIONS the Times, London, May 9, 1966 The

    SOUTHERN AFRICA NEWS BULLETIN Committee on Southern Africa, National Student Christian Federation, 475 Riverside Drive, New York, N. Y., 10027. Room 754. RHODESIA NEWS SUMv4ARY Weekof May 5 -ll EDITORIALS AND PERSONAL COMMEM The Economist - May 7, 1966 Letter to the Editor from Patrick Wall, House of Commons. "I wonder if your article "Talks about Talks" (April 30) has really struck the right balance. The implication is that Rhodesia's economy is being rapidly eroded by sanctions and that the South Africans are not prepared to offer them long-term support. As far as one can ascertain it would seem that Rhodesia's economy has remained remarkably buoyant after nearly sic months of sanctions. It is true that the policy of sanctions may have made Rhodesians more amenable to negotiations but surely this is also true of the British economy. The total cost of the Rhodes ian campaign in visibles and invisibles has been estimated at some 1200 million in a full year and it must now be clar to Mr. Wilson that whether he likes it or not the next step will be the imposition of mandatory sanctions by the United Nations not only on Rhodesia but also on Scuth Africa and the Portuguese territories. The first and major victim of this step would be the British economy--deprived of our third best trade partner the blow might be mortal. I believe that these factors together with the ,strongly expressed views of the Governor and the Chief Justice must be foremost in Mr. Wilson's mind and it is surely he, rather than Mr.
  • Academies Face Council Scrutiny

    Academies Face Council Scrutiny

    Free schools: pensions: elin de zoete: why are they support staff how to do pr waiting? scheme deficits as a school Page 4 Page 5 Page 18 SCHOOLSWEEK.CO.UK FRIDAY, OCT 7, 2016 | EDITION 79 Conservative PA/WIRE conference round-up page 2 Academies face council scrutiny Local boards may summon CEOs of vulnerable trusts Too many chains at the bottom of the tables, says Laws P16 FREDDIE WHITTAKER trusts that run them. It follows warnings from union leaders that @FCDWHITTAKER Investigates councils are powerless to intervene when they LIBBY NICHOLAS Councils could soon have scrutiny powers over hear about educational underperformance and academies similar to those they already have for poor attendance in academies, and after MPs SUPERMARKETS AND health bodies as the government seeks to boost questioned the accountability of the government’s mechanisms for intervention in schools. network of schools commissioners. SCHOOLS ARE NOT Schools Week understands that the Department Existing scrutiny boards or committees allow for Education (DfE) is in talks about replicating the councils to hold local health bodies to account. THAT DIFFERENT work of council “health scrutiny boards” to address They can interrogate those responsible for health fears about the quality of some academies and the services in their area Continues on page 3 The nation’s biggest and FREE careers and training event THE • Education •Training SKILLS SkillsShow • Apprenticeships • Job opportunities SHOW Find out more at theskillsshow.com 17-19 NOVEMBER BIRMINGHAM NEC 2 @SCHOOLSWEEK
  • 8984 the LONDON GAZETTE, Isra OCTOBER 1974

    8984 the LONDON GAZETTE, Isra OCTOBER 1974

    8984 THE LONDON GAZETTE, ISra OCTOBER 1974 19. Wokingham County Constituency 51. Truro County Constituency William Radcliffe van STRAUBENZEE, Esquire, M.B.E. David Charles PENHALIGON, Esquire. 20. Eton and Slough Borough Constituency Miss Joan1 LESTOR. ' CUMBRIA 21. Reading North Borough Constituency 52. Penrith and The Border County Constituency Robert Anthony Bevis DURANT, Esquire. The Rt. Hon. William Stephen Ian WHITELAW, C.H., M.C. BUCKINGHAMSHIRE 53. Westmorland County Constituency 22. Aylesbury County Constituency Thomas Michael JOPLING, Esquire. Timothy Hugh Francis RAISON, Esquire. 54. Whitehaven County Constituency 23. Beaconsfield County Constituency John Anderson CUNNINGHAM, Esquire. Ronald McMillan BELL, Esquire, Q.C. 55. Workington County Constituency 24. Buckingham County Constituency The Rt. Hon. Thomas Frederick PEART. William Richard BENYON, Esquire. 56. Barrow-in-Furness, Borough Constituency 25. Chesham and Amersham County Constituency Albert Edward BOOTH, Esquire. The Rt. Hon. Ian Hedworth John Little GILMOUR. 57. Carlisle Borough Constituency 26. Wycombe County Constituency Ronald Howard LEWIS. Esquire. Sir John HALL, Knight, O.B.E., T.D. DERBYSHIRE CAMBRIDGESHIRE 58. Helper County Constituency 27. Cambridgeshire County Constituency Roderick Lemonde MACFARQUHAR, Esquire. The Rt. Hon. Francis Leslie PYM, M.C. 59. Bolsover County Constituency 28. Huntingdonshire County Constituency Dennis Edward SKINNER, Esquire. The Rt. Hon. Sir David Lockhart-Mure RENTON, K.B.E., 60. High Peak County Constituency T.D., Q.C. Spencer LE MARCHANT, Esquire. 29. Isle of Ely County Constituency 61. Ilkeston County Constituency Clement Raphael FREUD, Esquire. Raymond FLETCHER, Esquire. 30. Cambridge Borough Constituency 62. North East Derbyshire County Constituency David William Stennis Stuart LANE, Esquire. Thomas Henry SWAIN, Esquire. 31.
  • By-Election Results: Revised November 2003 1987-92

    By-Election Results: Revised November 2003 1987-92

    Factsheet M12 House of Commons Information Office Members Series By-election results: Revised November 2003 1987-92 Contents There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Summary 2 Parliament. Of these by-elections, eight resulted Notes 3 Tables 3 in a change in winning party compared with the Constituency results 9 1987 General Election. The Conservatives lost Contact information 20 seven seats of which four went to the Liberal Feedback form 21 Democrats and three to Labour. Twenty of the by- elections were caused by the death of the sitting Member of Parliament, while three were due to resignations. This Factsheet is available on the internet through: http://www.parliament.uk/factsheets November 2003 FS No.M12 Ed 3.1 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2003 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 By-election results: 1987-92 House of Commons Information Office Factsheet M12 Summary There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Parliament. This introduction gives some of the key facts about the results. The tables on pages 4 to 9 summarise the results and pages 10 to 17 give results for each constituency. Eight seats changed hands in the 1987 Parliament at by-elections. The Conservatives lost four seats to Labour and three to the Liberal Democrats. Labour lost Glasgow, Govan to the SNP. The merger of the Liberal Party and Social Democratic Party took place in March 1988 with the party named the Social and Liberal Democrats. This was changed to Liberal Democrats in 1989.
  • SEVEN HUNDRED and ELEVENTH MEETING Minutes of the Meeting of the Trustees Held at the National Portrait Gallery on Thursday 20 February 2003

    SEVEN HUNDRED and ELEVENTH MEETING Minutes of the Meeting of the Trustees Held at the National Portrait Gallery on Thursday 20 February 2003

    SEVEN HUNDRED AND ELEVENTH MEETING Minutes of the Meeting of the Trustees held at the National Portrait Gallery on Thursday 20 February 2003 Present: Sir David Scholey (Chairman) Professor David Cannadine Ms Flora Fraser Professor Ludmilla Jordanova Mr Tom Phillips Ms Sara Selwood Miss Alexandra Shulman Sir John Weston Baroness Willoughby In attendance: Mr Sandy Nairne Mr Jacob Simon 1. Apologies for Absence Apologies were received from the Rt Hon. Robin Cook, Ms Amelia Fawcett, Sir Max Hastings, Professor Phillip King, Dr Christopher Ondaatje and Professor the Earl Russell. 2. Trustees The Chairman thanked Flora Fraser for her service as Vice Chairman. • THE TRUSTEES agreed to the appointment of David Cannadine as her successor as Vice Chairman. 3. Minutes of the Last Meeting The minutes of the meeting held on 21 November 2002 were approved. 4. Matters Arising The Director reported that the Management Statement/Financial Memorandum, the framework agreement between the Gallery and the DCMS, had now been signed, subject to a letter being appended to the document, with the agreement of the DCMS, clarifying the fact that the document could not be taken to override the Gallery's status as an exempt charity.Trustees would be sent a copy of the agreement and appended letter. 5. Director's Report The Director reported that it is proposed to bring the drawing of Lucian Freud, currently in David Hockney's exhibition at Annely Juda, to the May meeting of Trustees. The innovationof circulating a selection of press cuttings to Trustees was generally welcomed. There was a discussion of our expectations of the Americans and the JuliaMargaret Cameron exhibitions and the Trustees complimented Hazel Sutherland on her achievement in obtaining such extensive coverage for Cameron.
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell

    Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell

    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
  • Love Letters Between Lady Susan Hay and Lord James Ramsay 1835

    Love Letters Between Lady Susan Hay and Lord James Ramsay 1835

    LOVE LETTERS BETWEEN LADY SUSAN HAY AND LORD JAMES RAMSAY 1835 Edited by Elizabeth Olson with an introduction by Fran Woodrow in association with The John Gray Centre, Haddington I II Contents Acknowledgements iv Editing v Maps vi Family Trees viii Illustrations xvi Introduction xxx Letters 1 Appendix 102 Further Reading 103 III Acknowledgements he editor and the EERC are grateful to East Lothian Council Archives Tand Ludovic Broun-Lindsay for permission to reproduce copies of the correspondence. Thanks are due in particular to Fran Woodrow of the John Gray Centre not only for providing the editor with electronic copies of the original letters and generously supplying transcriptions she had previously made of some of them, but also for writing the introduction. IV Editing he letters have been presented in a standardised format. Headers provide Tthe name of the sender and of the recipient, and a number by which each letter can be identified. The salutations and valedictions have been reproduced as they appear in the originals, but the dates when the letters were sent have been standardised and placed immediately after the headers. Due to the time it took for letters from England to reach Scotland, Lord James Ramsay had already sent Lady Susan Hay three before she joined the correspondence. This time lapse, and the fact that thereafter they started writing to each other on a more or less daily basis, makes it impossible to arrange the letters sensibly in order of reply. They have instead been arranged chronologically, with the number of the reply (where it can be identified) added to the notes appended to each letter.
  • Download Publication

    Download Publication

    ARTS COUNCIL CONTENTS C hairina;,'~ Introduction 4 The Arts Council of Great Britain, as a 5 publicly accountable body, publishes an Sui kA• 1r. -C;eneral's Preface 8 Annual Report to provide Parliament and Departmental Report s 14 the general public with an overview of th e Scotland year's work and to record ail grants an d Wales 15 guarantees offered in support of the arts . Council 16 Membership of Council and Staff 17 A description of the highlights of th e Advisory Panels and Committee s 18 Council's work and discussion of its policie s Staff 23 appear in the newspaper Arts in Action Annual Accounts 25 which is published in conjunction with thi s Funds, Exhibitions, SchewsandAuvrd~ Report and can be obtained, free of charge , from the Arts Council Shop, 8 Long Acre , London WC2 and arts outlets throughou t the country . The objects for which the Arts Council of Great Britain is established are : I To develop and improve the knowledge , understanding and practice of the arts ; 2 To increase the accessibility of the arts to the public throughout Great Britain ; 3 To co-operate with governmen t departments, local authorities and othe r bodies to achieve these objects. CHAIRMAN'S INTRODUCTION and performing artists and of helping t o wherever possible both Mth local build up the audiences which must be th e authorities and with private sponsors. real support for the arts . It is the actua l event, the coming together of artist an d The Arts Council is very conscious that th e audience, which matters .