DOCSLIB.ORG

Key Insights from PISA 2018 for the United Kingdom What Is PISA?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Key Insights from PISA 2018 for the United Kingdom What Is PISA? NFER Education Briefings Key insights from PISA 2018 for the United Kingdom What is PISA? The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is an important worldwide research study involving schools and pupils from 79 participating countries and economies. It is run by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and takes place every three years. PISA is designed to examine how 15-year-olds can apply what they have learned in school to real life situations. Pupils are asked to use their skills of reasoning, interpretation and problem solving rather than simply remembering facts. Each cycle of PISA has a different focus. The main focus in PISA 2018 was reading, but it also included questions on mathematics and science1. PISA also gathers extensive background information about pupils’ home and school learning environments and experiences. This information can provide powerful insights into how well education systems are functioning, and how teaching and learning can be improved for all pupils in the UK and around the world. Who is NFER? What can PISA tell us about The lives of children and young people reading, mathematics and worldwide are inextricably linked to science in the UK? the amount and quality of education they receive. At NFER, our mission is to PISA is designed to assess pupils’ skills in improve outcomes for future generations reading, mathematics and science. everywhere and to support positive change across education systems. It allows us to draw comparisons with a large number of other countries from We do this by: around the world and, more importantly, to • creating and sharing research evidence monitor education in our own countries over and insights on education policy and time in a global context. practice PISA provides information to support • informing policymakers and other key improvements to education systems decision-makers worldwide and all four UK countries • providing insights, resources and support participate. to strengthen practice in the classroom. Making a positive impact on children’s and young people’s experience of education, their outcomes and on teaching and learning is at the heart of everything we do. In the majority of countries that participated in PISA, pupils who saw themselves as competitive scored higher in reading than pupils who perceived themselves as less competitive (OECD, 2019). Pupils in all UK countries expressed a high degree of disapproval of bullying behaviours (Sizmur et al, 2019). Internationally, the results from PISA 2018 showed that the more anti-bullying attitudes there were in a pupil’s school, the less likely they were to be bullied 1 (OECD, 2019). Some pupils in Scotland also answered questions on global competence. Interpreting the results It is important that the PISA results are interpreted appropriately, as a simplistic view can be misleading. The following points should, therefore, be borne in mind. Comparisons between countries Rather than focussing on the rankings of countries, it is more important to know whether countries are statistically similar or different. For example, a country may have an improved score in a particular subject, but may have fallen in the rankings due to the improved performance of other countries, or just the mix of countries in any given cycle. Changes over time An increase or decrease in score from one cycle to the next does not necessarily indicate that national achievement has improved or declined. It is crucial to consider whether a score is statistically different from previous scores and that changes have not arisen solely by chance. Moreover, any change in scores may not necessarily be attributed directly to national education policies, as it may take many years to understand the full picture. Further analysis is often needed to follow up initial headline findings. Variations in pupil achievement A simple average score does not provide a full picture of a particular country. For this reason, PISA also looks at the range of pupil achievement within countries. It examines the differences between the highest and lowest scores and the proportions of pupils working at high, medium and low international benchmarks, known as proficiency levels. For example, two countries could have the same overall mean score but one might have all its pupils demonstrating similar ‘average’ performance, while the other has high proportions of pupils achieving very high scores, but also high proportions with very low scores, perhaps not even reaching basic proficiency levels. This would suggest less equity across pupils. This kind of evidence can be used to identify particular groups of pupils where resources can be targeted most effectively. Comparisons with national exams PISA assessments are not curriculum based and use different methods from national examinations, as they have different goals and outputs. PISA is designed to look at the performance of education systems, not of individual pupils. Comparisons with national exams should be interpreted with some caution. Education policy PISA provides in-depth information about education systems, schools and pupils. It explores the relationship between contextual background factors and pupil achievement. This information can help countries to make evidence-based decisions, using PISA results alongside other sources of evidence to develop and adapt education policy. For more information visit www.nfer.ac.uk/international 3 • England • Northern Ireland How do the results compare across the UK? • Scotland • Wales Reading was the main Reading focus of the OECD 505 504 PISA study in 2018. scores 501 PISA conceives of reading as a broad set of competencies that allows readers to engage OECD average (487) with written information, 483 presented in one or Pupils in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland scored more texts, for a specific significantly higher than the average score across the OECD. The purpose. average score in Wales was similar to the OECD average but significantly lower than England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Achievement gap in reading Proportions of low and PISA shows some variation in the size of the achievement high performers in reading gap in different countries. In reading, the gap between highest and lowest achievers was largest in England and smallest in Scotland. 17% England 12% Lowest (10th percentile) Highest (90th percentile) 372 262 634 Northern 368 255 623 18% 9% Ireland 383 244 627 15% 10% 359 250 608 Scotland 354 260 614 300 700 22% Wales 7% Reading trends over time Reading in Scotland has improved since 2015 23% OECD 9% while the trend is stable in other parts of the UK. average 506 505 504 Lowest Top performers: 500 500 500 499 performers: Pupils reaching Below Level 2 Levels 5 and 6 501 499 which is defined in reading are 496 498 497 by OECD as basic considered to be 495 495 proficiency. ‘top performers’ in 493 493* the global context. 491 490 487 486 England had the largest proportion 483 of high-scoring pupils (significantly 481 476 477 higher than the OECD average). 480 Scotland had the smallest proportion of pupils working at 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 the lowest levels (below basic *The mean score of that year is was statistically proficiency). 4 different from the mean score in 2018. Pupils in England scored significantly higher Science Science in PISA 2018 than the other UK nations and the OECD Northern is defined by three scores average for science. Pupils’ scores in Ireland, Scotland and Wales were statistically competencies of similar to each other and to the OECD average. explaining phenomena 507 scientifically; evaluating and designing scientific enquiry; and 491 interpreting data and 490 evidence scientifically. OECD average 488 (489) Achievement gap in science Proportions of low and In science, the gap between highest and lowest achievers high performers in science was largest in England and smallest in Wales. 17% 10% Lowest (10th percentile) Highest (90th percentile) England 375 260 635 370 239 609 19% Northern 5% Ireland 366 251 617 371 232 603 21% Scotland 7% 365 244 609 300 700 20% Wales 5% Science trends over time OECD 22% 7% The trend in science was downwards in Northern Ireland, average Wales and Scotland while England has remained stable. 516 516 515 Lowest Top performers: 512 performers: Pupils reaching 515* 514* 513* Below Level 2 Levels 5 and 6 507 which is defined in science are 511* 508* by OECD as basic considered to be 507* proficiency. ‘top performers’ in 505* 500 the global context. 498* 498* 497 England had the largest proportion 495 496 491 of high-scoring pupils (significantly 490 higher than the OECD). Wales had 491 491 489 a significantly smaller proportion of 485 488 high-achieving pupils than across the OECD. England also had the 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 smallest proportion of low-scoring pupils (significantly lower than the *The mean score of that year was statistically OECD) while other UK countries different from the mean score in 2018. were similar to the OECD average. 5 The highest attainment for mathematics was in The construct of Mathematics England, where scores were significantly higher mathematical literacy scores than other UK countries and higher than the used in PISA 2018 OECD average. Scotland, Wales and Northern describes the capacities Ireland were not significantly different from each other or from the OECD average. of individuals to reason 504 mathematically and use mathematical concepts, procedures, facts and tools to describe, 492 explain and predict OECD average 489 487 phenomena. (489) Achievement gap in mathematics Proportions of low and high In mathematics, the gap between highest and lowest performers in mathematics achievers was largest in Scotland and smallest in Wales. Lowest (10th percentile) Highest (90th percentile) 19% England 14% 383 240 623 377 223 600 20% Northern 8% Ireland 367 243 610 381 211 592 23% Scotland 11% 370 235 605 300 700 21% Wales 7% Mathematics trends over time England and Wales have improved their maths score OECD Scotland Northern Ireland 24% 11% over time, has declined and average has remained stable.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elementary and Grammar Education in Late Medieval France
    KNOWLEDGE COMMUNITIES Lynch Education in Late Medieval France Elementary and Grammar Sarah B. Lynch Elementary and Grammar Education in Late Medieval France Lyon, 1285-1530 Elementary and Grammar Education in Late Medieval France Knowledge Communities This series focuses on innovative scholarship in the areas of intellectual history and the history of ideas, particularly as they relate to the communication of knowledge within and among diverse scholarly, literary, religious, and social communities across Western Europe. Interdisciplinary in nature, the series especially encourages new methodological outlooks that draw on the disciplines of philosophy, theology, musicology, anthropology, paleography, and codicology. Knowledge Communities addresses the myriad ways in which knowledge was expressed and inculcated, not only focusing upon scholarly texts from the period but also emphasizing the importance of emotions, ritual, performance, images, and gestures as modalities that communicate and acculturate ideas. The series publishes cutting-edge work that explores the nexus between ideas, communities and individuals in medieval and early modern Europe. Series Editor Clare Monagle, Macquarie University Editorial Board Mette Bruun, University of Copenhagen Babette Hellemans, University of Groningen Severin Kitanov, Salem State University Alex Novikoff, Fordham University Willemien Otten, University of Chicago Divinity School Elementary and Grammar Education in Late Medieval France Lyon, 1285-1530 Sarah B. Lynch Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: Aristotle Teaching in Aristotle’s Politiques, Poitiers, 1480-90. Paris, BnF, ms fr 22500, f. 248 r. Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 90 8964 986 7 e-isbn 978 90 4852 902 5 (pdf) doi 10.5117/9789089649867 nur 684 © Sarah B.
    [Show full text]
  • Eisteddfod Branding
    The National Eisteddfod The National Eisteddfod is Wales’ largest festival, held alternately in north and south Wales, celebrating the Welsh language and culture of Wales. Its history can be traced back to the court of the Lord Rhys in 1176, with the modern day Eisteddfod held every year bar one since 1861. The festival has evolved and developed greatly over the past ten years, with over 1,000 events held across the Maes (site) during the eight-day festival. The Eisteddfod also plays host to over 200 competitions, with many of these held in the main Pavilion during the week. The other events are held across the Maes, some in semi- permanent buildings and others in attractive tents and yurts, such as Tŷ Gwerin and Caffi Maes B. We know the Eisteddfod and the community project are unique. Our brand needs to celebrate and embrace this uniqueness. Information on the festival and all events can be found online, www.eisteddfod.wales The project The Eisteddfod is looking to rebrand the festival and the organisation over the next year. The Eisteddfod festival is an iconic brand, the word itself is known across the world, and our brand needs to reflect this, with the word playing a central part in any graphic. Typography is very important to us. With so many events and activities held during the week and the community project, the typography must be strong and instantly recognisable – emphasising the uniqueness of the festival and the project and its central place in the culture of Wales. The successful agency will need to deliver a brand which overcomes a number of challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Height of Its Womanhood': Women and Genderin Welsh Nationalism, 1847-1945
    'The height of its womanhood': Women and genderin Welsh nationalism, 1847-1945 Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Kreider, Jodie Alysa Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 09/10/2021 04:59:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/280621 'THE HEIGHT OF ITS WOMANHOOD': WOMEN AND GENDER IN WELSH NATIONALISM, 1847-1945 by Jodie Alysa Kreider Copyright © Jodie Alysa Kreider 2004 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partia' Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2004 UMI Number: 3145085 Copyright 2004 by Kreider, Jodie Alysa All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform 3145085 Copyright 2004 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrangement Between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the States of Guernsey (The
    ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE STATES OF GUERNSEY (THE GOVERNMENT OF GUERNSEY) CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM-CROWN DEPENDENCIES CUSTOMS UNION The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of Guernsey (together “the Governments”), ACKNOWLEDGING that the United Kingdom continues to be responsible for the international relations of Guernsey in international law and that this Arrangement cannot therefore create obligations which are binding under international law and is not intended to alter or affect the constitutional relationship between Guernsey and the United Kingdom, DESIRING to enter into a customs union covering all trade in goods involving the elimination between its members of customs duty on imports and exports and of any charges having equivalent effect, and the adoption of a common customs tariff in their relations with third countries, ACKNOWLEDGING that this Arrangement is without prejudice to the imposition of import value added tax (hereinafter referred to as “import VAT”) or excise duty, or any charges having equivalent effect to import VAT or excise duty, on goods imported into the United Kingdom from Guernsey or into Guernsey from the United Kingdom, RECOGNISING the importance of delivering a safe and fiscally secure customs regime, RECOGNISING the importance of cooperation in delivering such a regime, HAVE DECIDED as follows: PARAGRAPH 1 Object 1. This Arrangement concerns the establishment and operation of the United Kingdom- Crown Dependencies Customs Union (hereinafter referred to as “the Customs Union”), the members of which are the United Kingdom, Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man.
    [Show full text]
  • H 955 Great Britain
    Great Britain H 955 BACKGROUND: The heading Great Britain is used in both descriptive and subject cataloging as the conventional form for the United Kingdom, which comprises England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. This instruction sheet describes the usage of Great Britain, in contrast to England, as a subject heading. It also describes the usage of Great Britain, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales as geographic subdivisions. 1. Great Britain vs. England as a subject heading. In general assign the subject heading Great Britain, with topical and/or form subdivisions, as appropriate, to works about the United Kingdom as a whole. Assign England, with appropriate subdivision(s), to works limited to that country. Exception: Do not use the subdivisions BHistory or BPolitics and government under England. For a work on the history, politics, or government of England, assign the heading Great Britain, subdivided as required for the work. References in the subject authority file reflect this practice. Use the subdivision BForeign relations under England only in the restricted sense described in the scope note under EnglandBForeign relations in the subject authority file. 2. Geographic subdivision. a. Great Britain. Assign Great Britain directly after topics for works that discuss the topic in relation to Great Britain as a whole. Example: Title: History of the British theatre. 650 #0 $a Theater $z Great Britain $x History. b. England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales. Assign England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, or Wales directly after topics for works that limit their discussion to the topic in relation to one of the four constituent countries of Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Four Health Systems of the United Kingdom: How Do They Compare?
    The four health systems of the United Kingdom: how do they compare? Gwyn Bevan, Marina Karanikolos, Jo Exley, Ellen Nolte, Sheelah Connolly and Nicholas Mays Source report April 2014 About this research This report is the fourth in a series dating back to 1999 which looks at how the publicly financed health care systems in the four countries of the UK have fared before and after devolution. The report was commissioned jointly by The Health Foundation and the Nuffield Trust. The research team was led by Nicholas Mays at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The research looks at how the four national health systems compare and how they have performed in terms of quality and productivity before and after devolution. The research also examines performance in North East England, which is acknowledged to be the region that is most comparable to Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland in terms of socioeconomic and other indicators. This report, along with an accompanying summary report, data appendices, digital outputs and a short report on the history of devolution (to be published later in 2014), are available to download free of charge at www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/compare-uk-health www.health.org.uk/compareUKhealth. Acknowledgements We are grateful: to government statisticians in the four countries for guidance on sources of data, highlighting problems of comparability and for checking the data we have used; for comments on the draft report from anonymous referees and from Vernon Bogdanor, Alec Morton and Laura Schang; and for guidance on national clinical audits from Nick Black and on nursing data from Jim Buchan.
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom’S DST, and Supports Findings OFFICE of the UNITED STATES I
    30364 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices HTSUS subheading Product description 7019.90.50 ................. Glass fibers (including glass wool), nesoi, and articles thereof, nesoi. 7403.29.01 ................. Copper alloys (o/than copper-zinc, copper-tin alloys), unwrought nesoi. 8418.10.00 ................. Combined refrigerator-freezers, fitted with separate external doors, electric or other. 9003.11.00 ................. Frames and mountings, of plastics, for spectacles, goggles or the like. 9005.10.00 ................. Binoculars. 9005.80.40 ................. Optical telescopes, including monoculars. 9005.80.60 ................. Monoculars and astronomical instruments other than binoculars and optical telescopes but not including instruments for radio-astronomy. 9010.60.00 ................. Projection screens. 9012.10.00 ................. Microscopes other than optical microscopes; diffraction apparatus. 9015.40.80 ................. Photogrammetrical surveying instruments and appliances, other than electrical. 9015.80.20 ................. Optical surveying, hydrographic, oceanographic, hydrological, meteorological or geophysical instruments and appliances, nesoi. 9027.50.80 ................. Nonelectrical instruments and apparatus using optical radiations (ultraviolet, visible, infrared), nesoi. [FR Doc. 2021–11856 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am] implementation of additional duties on investigations/section-301- BILLING CODE 3290–F1–P products, contact [email protected]. digitalservices-taxes. The report
    [Show full text]
  • Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States
    The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States Updated April 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33105 SUMMARY RL33105 The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and April 16, 2021 Relations with the United States Derek E. Mix Many U.S. officials and Members of Congress view the United Kingdom (UK) as the United Specialist in European States’ closest and most reliable ally. This perception stems from a combination of factors, Affairs including a sense of shared history, values, and culture; a large and mutually beneficial economic relationship; and extensive cooperation on foreign policy and security issues. The UK’s January 2020 withdrawal from the European Union (EU), often referred to as Brexit, is likely to change its international role and outlook in ways that affect U.S.-UK relations. Conservative Party Leads UK Government The government of the UK is led by Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the Conservative Party. Brexit has dominated UK domestic politics since the 2016 referendum on whether to leave the EU. In an early election held in December 2019—called in order to break a political deadlock over how and when the UK would exit the EU—the Conservative Party secured a sizeable parliamentary majority, winning 365 seats in the 650-seat House of Commons. The election results paved the way for Parliament’s approval of a withdrawal agreement negotiated between Johnson’s government and the EU. UK Is Out of the EU, Concludes Trade and Cooperation Agreement On January 31, 2020, the UK’s 47-year EU membership came to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study of the English Early Childhood Education and Care System
    e Early h l Case Studies na of E A atio ar Trn ly d te Ch In il dh v o o d a E d u n c a t io t n a a n d g C a r e e S y s t e m s EvolvingResponsive a HarmonizedIntegrated Policymaking and Hybrid andUniversal Implementation:System of ECEC: Maintaining the Reform Momentum RespectingEarlyAFrom Careful Childhood Equality Children Balancing to Services:and Equity ActFamilies Using Data for Improvement HongSingaporeAustraliaEnglandFinland Kong Integrated and Universal Early Childhood Services: Using Data for Improvement A Case Study of the English Early Childhood Education and Care System Professor Kathy Sylva, Grace Murkett, and Beatriz Melendro October 5, 2018 CopyrightÓ 2018 Teachers College All rights reserved International Case Studies of Innovative Early Childhood Systems: England Contents Executive Summary 1 Part 1 Introduction 11 Chapter 1: Study Overview .......................................................................................................... 12 Rationale and Goals ................................................................................................................... 12 Study Architecture ..................................................................................................................... 14 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 20 Data Collection, Analysis, and Validation................................................................................ 24 Definitions and Abbreviations
    [Show full text]
  • Who Identifies As Welsh? National
    November 2014 DYNAMICS OF DIVERSITY: EVIDENCE FROM THE 2011 CENSUS ESRC Centre on Dynamics of Ethnicity (CoDE) Who identifies asWelsh? National identities and ethnicity in Wales Summary • In Wales, 1.8 million people identify only as Welsh (58% of • People born in Wales are more likely to report only a Welsh the population) and 218,000 identify as Welsh and British national identity (76%). People born in Oceania and North (7% of the population). America and the Caribbean are more likely to report only a Welsh national identity (14% and 10% respectively) than • Mixed ethnic groups are more likely to identify with only people born in England (8%). a Welsh national identity than all other ethnic minority groups, with the highest proportion being amongst the White and Black Caribbean (59%) group. Introduction Since devolution, the Welsh Government has sought to • Mixed groups are more likely to identify only as Welsh support a common Welsh national identity through the ‘One (47%) than mixed groups in England (46%) and Scotland Wales’ strategy. This has included, for example, strengthening (37%) identify as English or Scottish only. the place of ‘Wales in the World’ and continued support for 1 • The ethnic groups in Wales most likely to identify only as the Welsh language. The inclusion of a question on national British are Bangladeshi (64%), Pakistani (56%) and Black identity in the 2011 Census provides us with an opportunity Caribbean (41%). to examine how people living in Wales describe themselves. The Census shows that 58% of people living in Wales identify • Welsh only national identity is reported more for younger only as Welsh and a further 7% identify as Welsh and British.2 people aged 0 to 17 than those aged 18 or older.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Education in the Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries in England and Wales: a Study of Attitudes and Practi Ce
    FEMALE EDUCATION IN THE LATE SIXTEENTH AND EARLY SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES IN ENGLAND AND WALES: A STUDY OF ATTITUDES AND PRACTI CE Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy: January 1996 Caroline Mary Kynaston Bowden Institute of Education, University of London \ 2 ABSTRACT OF THESIS This thesis provides a study of attitudes and practice in respect of female education in England and Wales in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. It begins with a review of primary and secondary sources, and throughout draws substantially upon personal documents consulted in collections of family papers covering a wide geographical area. These documents, it is argued are broadly representative of gentry families. Chapter Two examines the education of daughters; Chapter Three the role of women in marriage; Chapter Four motherhood. Each of these chapters examines the links between education and the roles girls and women fulfilled. Throughout these three chapters, contrasts and comparisons are drawn between prescriptive advice and practice. Chapter Five considers the difficult issue of standards in the education of girls and women, while the final chapter examines some of the outcomes of education in terms of women as intermediaries in informal power networks, estate and farm managers and educational benefactors and founders. The thesis draws conclusions in respect of the importance of education in permitting the developing role of women in both private and public spheres and examines the reasons for such changes. It also challenges existing theories regarding the differences between Catholic and Protestant attitudes to girls' education. A substantial appendix listing some 870 educated and literate women of the period is provided, both to demonstrate the major sources for this study and to provide a basis for future research.
    [Show full text]