DOCSLIB.ORG

Sally Hemings, and Was Sired on Her by Thomas Jefferson, but There Is an Absence of DNA Evidence to Demonstrate Either That He Was Or That He Wasn’T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sally Hemings, and Was Sired on Her by Thomas Jefferson, but There Is an Absence of DNA Evidence to Demonstrate Either That He Was Or That He Wasn’T “DASHING SALLY” AND THE “PHILOSOPHIC COCK” THOMAS JEFFERSON Thomas Woodson’s descendents claim he was a son of Sally Hemings, and was sired on her by Thomas Jefferson, but there is an absence of DNA evidence to demonstrate either that he was or that he wasn’t. Absence of evidence is not evidence of anything, but not only are there no plantation records suggesting that Hemings was Woodson’s mother but also the oral testimony of Woodson’s descendents is directly contradicted by the oral testimony of Sally’s son Madison Hemings.1 DO I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION? GOOD. 1. Gordon-Reed, Annette. THOMAS JEFFERSON AND SALLY HEMINGS. Pages 67-75 HDT WHAT? INDEX MONTICELLO SALLY HEMINGS 1647 Just when and how the economic logic of slave ownership took shape is a fascinating question. One wonders what analogies slave owners used as they considered the implications of owning female slaves AND the offspring of these females. Clearly, this logic was different from that entailed by servitude, for in general the masters of servants in early America struggled not to get them to reproduce themselves but instead to prevent them from engaging in any sexual relations (with each other, at least). In general they did not want their female servants either to marry or to get pregnant, because either of these would of course diminish the amount of labor the master could extract from the distracted servant. The most obvious analogy is between the ownership of black slaves and the ownership of ordinary livestock. As early as the 1640s, Virginia planters were selling and bequeathing female “Negroes” using language that resembled the wording of similar deeds for the transfer of livestock. In a document dating to this year in the county court records of Northampton County VA, a slavemaster, Stephen Charlton, gave to one of his daughters some livestock and “a Negro girle named Sisley aged about foure or five yeares, to injoye them and their increase both male & female for ever.” The word “them” in this document clearly referred not only to the bequested livestock but also to the bequested “Negro girle.” His daughter was to “injoye” not only the “Negro girle” Sisley but also Sisley’s “increase both male & female for ever.” This of course is fifteen years before a statute, in 1662, would direct that the status of the child followed that of the mother — Virginia planter slavemasters already had were acting as if there were no question whatsoever about this. The handling of human slaves clearly was quite a bit more delicate than the handling of livestock. One should resist any temptation to equate slave reproduction with the breeding of farm animals. Discussion of the “breeding” issue tends sometimes to be one-dimensional. What is missing is the slaves’ perspective, or more precisely their actions and choices with respect to reproduction. If they had children, and they did, surely it was not solely because owners wished to produce new laborers. Female and male slaves, like other humans, desired to have sexual relations, desired to have children, desired to form families, and they did so, albeit within a system that imposed constraints that were often horrific. For instance, who among us is going to fault Sally Hemings for forming the ignoble alliance which she formed with a well endowed white man? She was bred, but not exactly like a farm animal. Perhaps she would have preferred to marry someone, had more alternatives been available to her. Perhaps she would have appreciated it if Jefferson had at some point after fucking her, after producing children in her, set her free, something which he never would get around to doing, even at his death. We can trust, however, that this breeding relationship was something more complicated than a white rape of a black woman. “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project Monticello HDT WHAT? INDEX SALLY HEMINGS MONTICELLO 1773 In Virginia, a close-to-white child was born in this year, and was given the name Sally Hemings. This close- to-white child with straight hair was “dashing” but she had been gotten upon the slave Elizabeth (Betty) Hemings (1735-1807) by her owner John Wayles (1715-1773) and was therefore of course herself a slave. The mother Betty herself had been the daughter of a Captain Hemings upon an African-born woman, and Wayles would get upon her two other slave daughters and three slave sons (in addition this half-white slave Betty would bear eight other children sired by three other men, for a grand total of four white masters siring upon her fourteen near-white but enslaved offspring). When her white, free half-sister Martha Wayles would get married with Thomas Jefferson, Sally would constitute a part of her white, free half-sister’s wedding dowry, what fun! I wonder where Betty is buried. I wonder where Dashing Sally is buried. There is nothing like this in the Jefferson graveyard at Monticello, anywhere in the vicinity of Jefferson’s lamented good ’ol HDT WHAT? INDEX MONTICELLO SALLY HEMINGS buddy Dabney Carr’s gravestone. BOUGHT AND PAID FOR The Monticello graveyard was laid out in this year by Jefferson (since it has continued to be reserved as the family burial ground for his descendants, supposedly now it would be available for the burial of descendants of color! – what a shame that it is not. :-). He first would inter his close friend Dabney Carr there, in fulfillment of a pledge that whichever of them died first would be buried by the other under their favorite oak tree. Tom was such a romantic — it is indeed a pity that he didn’t have any romanticism left over, that would have HDT WHAT? INDEX SALLY HEMINGS MONTICELLO generated enough personal energy for him to have taught his mulatto slave offspring to read and write! “The United States of America had human slavery for almost one hundred years before that custom was recognized as a social disease and people began to fight it. Imagine that. Wasn’t that a match for Auschwitz? What a beacon of liberty we were to the rest of the world when it was perfectly acceptable here to own other human beings and treat them as we treated cattle. Who told you we were a beacon of liberty from the very beginning? Why would they lie like that? Thomas Jefferson owned slaves, and not many people found that odd. It was as though he had an infected growth on the end of his nose the size of a walnut, and everybody thought that was perfectly OK.” – Kurt Vonnegut, FATES WORSE THAN DEATH, page 84 THOMAS JEFFERSON CHANGE IS ETERNITY, STASIS A FIGMENT Monticello “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX MONTICELLO SALLY HEMINGS 1774 New Hampshire made itself the 1st state to declare itself independent from England. The ladies of Edenton, North Carolina, led by Mistress Penelope Barker, confronted British rule by putting away their teapots — this would become known as the “Edenton Tea Party.” “Thanks, but no thanks.” During this year one of the Virginia slaveholders, Thomas Jefferson, was preparing an anonymous tract SUMMARY VIEW OF THE RIGHTS OF BRITISH AMERICA, by which of course he meant the rights of white men of property and of proper English culture in the British colonies of North America. All and only white. All and only men. All and only propertied. All and only of proper English culture. –No others need apply. Jefferson had not been asked to draft these instructions — he had a way of producing documents in the hope they might be adopted, which in this case did not happen. His friends nevertheless published his text. A list of some of the slaves that our hero-of-freedom TJ was holding on his plantation Monticello is shown on the following screen, as a way graphically to illustrate the sad fact that indeed he did mean, and only mean, the rights of white men of property and of proper English culture in the British colonies of North America. All HDT WHAT? INDEX SALLY HEMINGS MONTICELLO and only white. All and only men. All and only propertied. All and only of proper English culture. –No others need apply. (You will search in vain on this list for the name of dashing Sally Hemings, although she had been born a slave in the previous year.2) We say that in this year Jefferson unsuccessfully planted olive cuttings at Monticello — we do not mean to imply by that, however, that he ever had or ever would hold a spade or hoe in his own hand. (Unaware that the Padres who had established missions along the coast of California were already cultivating olives there by 1769, in 1791 he would have several hundred cuttings sent from France to South Carolina, only to be disappointed when they wouldn’t bring in a lot of money.) PLANTS Word that he was the author of such a treatise would be spread by the Virginia legislature, and the reputation which he would achieve in this manner would help him, in a few years, gain appointment to the drafting committee of the Continental Congress for the writing of a Declaration of Independence. Samuel Ward, representative from Rhode Island to the convention, would describe Jefferson, on the basis of this pamphlet, as “a very sensible spirited fine Fellow,” and one may suppose that indeed he was a very sensible spirited fine Fellow —he certainly did possess the ability and energy to beget slave children, offspring with whom he then was too busy about our nation’s business to spend very much of his quality time with.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enslaved African Americans at the University of Virginia Walking Tour
    ENSLAVED AFRICAN AMERICANS C arrs 3 Henry Martin H il ad at the University of Virginia l R Ro | 1 d Rugby UVA Walking Tour According to oral history, Henry Martin was born Rd N comb at Monticello on July 4, 1826—the day Jefferson n ew Lane Enslaved African Americans at the University N died. He was sold to the Carr family at on Jefferson’s estate sale in 1827 and until 1847 Un adis ive M t29B rsity The University of Virginia utilized the labor of enslaved Av remained enslaved at a property in Albemarle R enu Alderman LIbrary e / African Americans from the earliest days of its County. In 1847, the Carrs hired out Mr. Martin Rt 250B et St / UVA Chapel to Mrs. Dabney Carr, who ran a boarding m m construction in 1817 until the end of the American E house just north of the University. Until the Civil War. Most of the University’s first enslaved general emancipation in 1865, Martin hauled coal, delivered wood, 3 laborers were rented from local slave-owners and and worked as a domestic laborer at her boarding house. In freedom, P he took a job with the University as janitor and bell ringer, which he worked alongside whites and free blacks in all the wrote about in a letter to College Topics, a student publication that 4 Hotel A tasks associated with constructing the Academical asked to report on his life story. Martin routinely awoke at 4 a.m. to 5 tend to his responsibilities. It was Martin who rang the bell to spread M Rotunda Village.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson's Failed Anti-Slavery Priviso of 1784 and the Nascence of Free Soil Constitutionalism
    MERKEL_FINAL 4/3/2008 9:41:47 AM Jefferson’s Failed Anti-Slavery Proviso of 1784 and the Nascence of Free Soil Constitutionalism William G. Merkel∗ ABSTRACT Despite his severe racism and inextricable personal commit- ments to slavery, Thomas Jefferson made profoundly significant con- tributions to the rise of anti-slavery constitutionalism. This Article examines the narrowly defeated anti-slavery plank in the Territorial Governance Act drafted by Jefferson and ratified by Congress in 1784. The provision would have prohibited slavery in all new states carved out of the western territories ceded to the national government estab- lished under the Articles of Confederation. The Act set out the prin- ciple that new states would be admitted to the Union on equal terms with existing members, and provided the blueprint for the Republi- can Guarantee Clause and prohibitions against titles of nobility in the United States Constitution of 1788. The defeated anti-slavery plank inspired the anti-slavery proviso successfully passed into law with the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. Unlike that Ordinance’s famous anti- slavery clause, Jefferson’s defeated provision would have applied south as well as north of the Ohio River. ∗ Associate Professor of Law, Washburn University; D. Phil., University of Ox- ford, (History); J.D., Columbia University. Thanks to Sarah Barringer Gordon, Thomas Grey, and Larry Kramer for insightful comment and critique at the Yale/Stanford Junior Faculty Forum in June 2006. The paper benefited greatly from probing questions by members of the University of Kansas and Washburn Law facul- ties at faculty lunches. Colin Bonwick, Richard Carwardine, Michael Dorf, Daniel W.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Sheet United States Department of the Interior National Park Service ^National Register of Historic Places Z** Inventory -- Nomination Form
    Form No, 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) DATA SHEET UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ^NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Z** INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS I NAME HISTORIC Eh^Thomas^Carr 'District AND/OR COMMON LOCATION /u STREET & NUMBER Near fcke* inter section of ~4*&gfawa-y 150 and - * • -- ^^u—£***eM^:**"a^WJC%t:S1-furc>"" *• *w**%» _ NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN , ; - - - - CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT : Thomson - 2L VICINITY OF 10th - Robert; G. Stephens, Jr, • - STATE, .CODE .... COUNTY - ; . CODE Georgia 13 - McDuff ie 189 HCLASSIFI CATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X_D'ISTRICT ^.PUBLIC X-OCCUPIED • " _ AGRICULTURE _ MUSEUM . — BUJLDING(S) . ^.PRIVATE ^-UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL "—PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS ' —EDUCATIONAL X-PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE ; . PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT ^RELIGIOUS •—OBJECT ._ IN PROCESS X-YES: RESTRICTED - • - —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL - —TRANSPORTATION " • : ; —NO —MILITARY ^ - —OTHER: WNER OF PROPERTY NAME Multiple owners STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE Thomson X_ VICINITY OF . Georgia COURTHOUSE. ' " REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC. County Courthouse STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE • ' Thomson Georgia I REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE None : DATE —FEDERAL ; _STATE —COUNTY : —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED X.ORIGINALSITE X-GOOD —RUINS X.ALTERED —MOVED DATE- —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Within the Thomas Carr District, a part of the original late eighteenth and early nineteenth century Carr Plantation, are the Simpson House, the Bonier house, the E. V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy Report of the Scholars Commission
    turner 00 fmt auto cx 3 3/17/11 10:54 AM Page iii The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy Report of the Scholars Commission Edited by Robert F. Turner Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina turner 00 fmt auto cx 3 4/15/11 5:36 AM Page iv Copyright © 2001, 2011 Robert F. Turner All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scholars Commission on the Jefferson-Hemings Matter. The Jefferson-Hemings controversy : report of the Scholars Commission / edited by Robert F. Turner. p. cm. ISBN 978-0-89089-085-1 (alk. paper) 1. Jefferson, Thomas, 1743–1826--Relations with women. 2. Hemings, Sally. 3. Jef- ferson, Thomas, 1743–1826--Relations with slaves. 4. Jefferson, Thomas, 1743–1826-- Family. I. Turner, Robert F. II. Title. E332.2.S35 2010 973.4'6092--dc22 2010031551 Carolina Academic Press 700 Kent Street Durham, NC 27701 Telephone (919) 489-7486 Fax (919) 493-5668 www.cap-press.com Printed in the United States of America turner 00 fmt auto cx 3 3/17/11 10:54 AM Page v This book is dedicated to the memory of our beloved colleagues Professor Lance Banning Hallam Professor of History University of Kentucky (January 24, 1942–January 31, 2006) and Professor Alf J. Mapp, Jr. Eminent Scholar, Emeritus and Louis I. Jaffe Professor of History, Emeritus Old Dominion University (February 17, 1925–January 23, 2011) turner 00 fmt auto cx 3 3/17/11 10:54 AM Page vii Contents Preface xiii Acknowledgments xv Members of the Scholars Commission xvii Scholars Commission on The Jefferson-Hemings Matter, Report 12 April 2001 3 Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Article a Visit to Vermont from Historic Roots Magazine About
    I HISTORIC ROOTS HISTORIC ROOTS Ann E. Cooper, Editor Deborah P. Clifford, Associate Editor ADVISORY BOARD Sally Anderson Nancy Chard Marianne Doe Mary Leahy Robert Lucenti Caroline L. Morse Meg Ostrum Michael Sherman Marshall True Catherine Wood Publication of Historic Roots is made possible in part by grants from the A.D. Henderson Foundation and Vermont-NEA. A Magazine of Vermont History Vol. 4 August 1999 No. 2 A VISIT TO VERMONT By SYDNEY N. STOKES, JR. In 1791, the United States was a new country. The battle for independence was over. A constitution had been drafted and adopted. A new government was at work in the nation's capital, Philadelphia. George Washington was president. It was not easy, running the new country. In Congress, members from individual states and from the north and the south disagreed fiercely. They disagreed about how the new government should work. They differed on how to admit new states and on trade policies. Members of the president's cabinet' argued about whether there should be a strong, centralized government or a looser organization of states. They debated whether business or farming should be the focus of economic life. The new government also had to Thomas Jefferson in 1791. develop ways of dealing with foreign countries, especially Britain and France. As Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson was 1 A cabinet is a group of people who serve as advisors to a country's leader. 4 5 A VISIT TO VERMONT take a trip to find out what people were thinking away from the capital city.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Biography, Through Biography, Toward an Integrated History
    Beyond Biography, Through Biography, Toward an Integrated DavidHistory Waldstreicher Reviews in American History, Volume 37, Number 2, June 2009, pp. 161-167 (Review) Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: 10.1353/rah.0.0102 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/rah/summary/v037/37.2.waldstreicher.html Access Provided by Sam Houston State University at 07/16/10 5:26PM GMT BEYOND BIOGRAPHY, THROUGH BIOGRAPHY, TOWARD AN INTEGRATED HISTORY David Waldstreicher Annette Gordon-Reed. The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family. New York: Norton, 2008. 800 pp. $35.00. To comprehend the nature and existence of Annette Gordon-Reed’s much- heralded, exquisitely crafted, triumphant history of Sally Hemings and her family, it helps to look back a decade, to a set of developments in public his- tory and scholarship that Gordon-Reed herself helped initiate. In Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: An American Controversy (1997), Gordon-Reed carefully evaluated the evidence for Jefferson’s paternity of some or all of Hemings’s children, beginning with that testimony first put into print publicly by James Thomas Callendar in 1802 and later confirmed in published interviews by Hemings’s descendants. She admitted the hearsay nature of the positive evidence and made her best case by undermining the other side’s arguments, showing that it amounted to far less than “proof” of Jefferson’s nonpaternity. The testimonies relied upon by Virginius Dabney, John C. Miller, Merrill Peterson, Douglass Adair, et al. derived from Jefferson’s family and partisan supporters. Indeed, nineteenth-century defenders of Jefferson had more reasons to dissemble or even destroy evidence, but their words had been taken at face value well into the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • SP Bencoolynfarm D9.Pdf
    THOMAS JEFFERSON APRIL 9, 1797 View of Ben Coolyn Farm from main residence looking northwest towards vineyard and Southwest Mountains. THE FIRST EUROPEAN AND AFRICAN-AMERICAN SETTLERS arrived at the Chestnut or Little Mountains in the 1730s, gradually establishing small farms and dwellings in what was then western Goochland County, Virginia. Known today as the Southwest Mountains, an approximately 45-mile chain of northeast to southwest oriented peaks extending from Orange County on the north to the Rivanna River on the south, this geographic landmark is the easternmost BEN COOLYN ridge of the Appalachian Mountains in central Virginia. The eastern slope of the Southwest Mountains attracted many early settlers due to its fertile and well-drained soils, as well as the abundance of natural resources. In 1797 Thomas Jefferson, whose Monticello residence is located in the Carter’s Mountain ridge of the same chain, described the Southwest Mountains as “the Eden of the United States for soil, climate, navigation and health.” An area rich in heritage, this part of Albemarle County possesses numerous historic homes surrounded by agricultural landscapes. The Southwest Mountains district still retains a landscape characteristic of its agricultural past with forested mountains, rolling hills, numerous drainages and open fields, one which its original settlers would still recognize today. Many of the region’s cultural and natural place names present in the mid-eighteenth century still survive today and provide a tangible link to the past. Ben Coolyn is one of several prominent estates that occupy the foothills of the Southwest Mountains. Its siting on a low ridge with a 360-degree view make it one of the most beautiful situations in Albemarle County.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File
    Tis pamphlet is a reprint of the executive summary of Te Jeferson-Hemings Controversy: Report of the Scholars Commission, the defnitive 412-page inquiry into the Jeferson- Hemings issue conducted by 12 distinguished scholars in 2001 under the leadership of Professor Robert F. Turner and published in book form by the Carolina Academic Press, ISBN-13: 978-0890890851. Te Scholars’ individual conclusions, with the exception of one member, ranged from “serious skepticism about the charge to a conviction that it is almost certainly false”. Reprinted with the permission of Professor Robert F. Turner, the Tomas Jeferson Heritage Society, and the Carolina Academic Press. July 4, 2016 Preface For more than two centuries there have been rumors and allegations that Thomas Jef- ferson had a long-term sexual relationship with an enslaved woman named Sally Hem- ings. They originated from the pen of a disreputable journalist named James Thomson Callender in October 1802 and were picked up by Federalist editors and abolitionists in the United States and abroad. Most serious Jefferson scholars and many of Jefferson’s po- litical enemies dismissed them, in part because the notorious Callender lacked credibil- ity and in part because the charge seemed so out of character for Jefferson. But the story resurfaced with the 1974 publication of Fawn Brodie’s Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate Bi- ography and became more believable in the 1997 book by Annette Gordon-Reed, Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings. Perhaps the most decisive development in the case was the publication in the prestigious British science journal Nature in November 1998 of results of a DNA study linking Sally Hemings’ youngest son to a Jeferson father.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Rights in John Marshall's Virginia: the Case of Crenshaw and Crenshaw V
    UIC Law Review Volume 33 Issue 4 Article 22 Summer 2000 Property Rights in John Marshall's Virginia: The Case of Crenshaw and Crenshaw v. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000) J. Gordon Hylton Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Judges Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Legal History Commons, Legal Profession Commons, Legal Writing and Research Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation J. Gordon Hylton, Property Rights in John Marshall's Virginia: The Case of Crenshaw and Crenshaw v. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol33/iss4/22 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PROPERTY RIGHTS IN JOHN MARSHALL'S VIRGINIA: THE CASE OF CRENSHAW AND CRENSHAW V. SLATE RIVER COMPANY J. GORDON HYLTON* As Jim Ely has reminded us, historians have long associated John Marshall with the twin causes of constitutional nationalism and the protection of property rights.! However, it would be a mistake to assume that these two concepts were inseparable or that it was Marshall's embrace of both that set him apart from his opponents. Nowhere is the severability of the two propositions more apparent than with Marshall's critics in his home state of Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Yes, Jefferson Owned Slaves
    Yes, Jefferson Owned Slaves. When he inherited slaves upon the deaths of his father and father-in-law, it was illegal to free them. In 1769 Jefferson wrote the statute that when later enacted permitted the manumission of Virginia slaves. He later authored the law that prohibited the importation of new slaves into Virginia; and his 1776 draft Virginia constitution provided: “No person hereafter coming into this country shall be held within the same in slavery under any pretext whatever.”1 In his draft of the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson charged King George III had “waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither.”2 Sadly the language was deleted when South Carolina and Georgia threatened to walk out of the convention.3 Writing for a British abolitionist newspaper in 1843, former President John Quincy Adams praised Jefferson’s struggle against slavery, contending that his draft Declaration stood as “an unanswerable testimonial to posterity, that on the roll of American abolitionists, first and foremost after the name of George Washington, is that of Thomas Jefferson.4 More than a century later, Philip Foner, editor of The Complete Writings of Thomas Paine, argued that the frequent characterization of Paine as “the first American abolitionist” was inaccurate because of Jefferson’s 1769 effort to legalize
    [Show full text]
  • The Room Where It Happened.” Negotiated the Compromise That Is Now and Frequent — Dinner Parties
    RETHINKING JEFFERSON’S PRIVATE SUITE PAGE 6 FALL/WINTER 2016 monticello.org VOLUME 27, NUMBER 2 THE ROOM WHERE IT H PPENED GAYLE JESSUP WHITE Known in history as the Great Compromise of 1790, Jefferson’s most Community Engagement Officer famous power dinner happened when the United States was a young and fragile Thomas Jefferson’s tombstone listed union of 13 states that, in spite of the the achievements for which he wanted recent signing of the U.S. Constitution, to be remembered — author of the was decidedly un-united. Adding to Declaration of Independence and the the turmoil, the founders had radically Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, different visions for America’s future, and father of the University of Virginia. threatening the nation’s very survival. But the Sage of Monticello probably The stakes were high in June 1790 wouldn’t have imagined that 190 when Jefferson invited Treasury years after his death he would also Secretary Alexander Hamilton and be celebrated as one of America’s first Virginia Congressman and future “foodies,” popularizing delicacies he president James Madison to dine at his imported from Europe, like ice cream home in New York City, then the nation’s and macaroni. Now, thanks to the temporary capital. Jefferson hoped success of the Broadway sensation that the dinner would help solve the Hamilton: An American Musical, many legislative gridlock about the new federal are learning that Jefferson also hosted government’s role and scope. America’s most famous “power dinner,” “The Room Where It Happens,” the hip- Even the threat of bankruptcy didn’t a probable precursor to today’s “power After enjoying copious French wine and a meal prepared by the enslaved hop interpretation of how the founders stop Jefferson from hosting elaborate — lunch,” in “the room where it happened.” negotiated the compromise that is now and frequent — dinner parties.
    [Show full text]
  • HIS 100: Introduction to Historical Methods: the World of Thomas Jefferson Fall 2010 Professor T. Slaughter Tuesday and Thursday
    HIS 100: Introduction to Historical Methods: The World of Thomas Jefferson Fall 2010 Professor T. Slaughter Tuesday and Thursday RR Library 456, 9:40-10:55. Office hours: Tuesday and Thursday 11-noon, and by appointment. 369B RR; 273-2799 [email protected] Thomas Jefferson is an ideal focus for discussions of the range of subjects that fascinated him, from gardening to food, wine, women, education, politics, philosophy, architecture, and plantation management. He provides an exquisite example of Enlightenment culture during the age of revolutions, and of a Founding Father who, as Secretary of State, Vice President, and President attempted to implement the revolutionary and constitutional principles on which the United States was founded. His private correspondence and public papers, his published writings and private musings, give access to Jefferson’s inner landscape as well as the world in which he lived. Through films, non-fiction and fiction, and primary source documents relating to case studies—The Declaration of Independence and its contrast to Thomas Paine’s Common Sense; the Burr Conspiracy; and Jefferson’s relationship with his slave Sally Hemings—we will explore historical research and interpretation, both our own and that of other historians. In particular, we will look at some of the ways that historical research can go wrong, and how historical writing is always a reflection of perspectives rather than of gathered facts, of interpretations rather than recovery, of creativity rather than objective engagement with sources. Your grades will be based on attendance; active, knowledgeable participation in class discussions; and three papers that you will re-write after the first drafts are returned to you.
    [Show full text]